MIGO : System propose in unrestricted Instead of QC.

Hi,
SAP Gurus,
I have maintain following setting
Material master -
QM View -
Inspection setup----
Inspection type 01 & 08 Active with Tick mark on Post to inspection stock & Tick on automatic UD.
Process: STOu2026..Deliveryu2026.PGIu2026u2026u2026GR through MIGO (Goods received against Outbound delivery)
Here I am facing problem: My requirement is "as QM view is maintain" The system should propose GR in quality (instead of Unrestricted ) But it is not happening System propose unrestricted only
Plz help
Best Regards,
Parag Save

Thanks for replay
I have made same setting so many times but same reply (Martial is proposed in unrestricted instead of Quality)
I think there might be plant specific QC setting .
Is it ?
Best Regards,
Parag Save.

Similar Messages

Very urgent - System proposes monday as delivery date on weekends

Dear Experts,
I am facing a problem where the client whenever he makes a sales order on a week end i.e. saturday or sunday, the system automatically proposes monday as the day of delivery and the schedule line is also prepared for monday (inspite of the unrestricted stock being available). In the SO Type and the material master, the lead time is 0, the factory calendar for the shipping point and the plant has already been set to 7 days working.
However, on entering the date manually, the system takes the date as requested.
We can check this situation only on a saturday or a sunday as the system works absolutely fine on other weekdays.
Kindly suggest a solution so that the system proposes the delivery date as the present date.
Regards
Vineet Jain

Check Factory Calender setting for Plant & Shipping Point.
Also Check the following things
1) In sales doc type OR check LEAD TIME IN DAYS , if LEAD TIME IN DAYS is maintained , make it zero (T.Code: VOV8)
2) In the shipping point check weather PICK TIME and PACK TIME are maintained or not, if they are maintained , remove them. (IMG -> Enterprise Structure -> Definition -> Logistics Execution -> Define, copy, delete, check shipping point)
3) for the material , go to that particual MMR and check the RLT feild is maintained or not in sales gen/ plant view (T.Code: MM02)
4) For the material , check weather any Inhouse production , is maintained in MMR or not in MRP1 view (T.Code: MM02)
if you make zero all these things the delivery date will be the sales order creation date.
Regards,
Rajesh Banka
Reward suitable points.
How to give points: Mark your thread as a question while creating it. In the answers you get, you can assign the points by clicking on the stars to the left. You also get a point yourself for rewarding (one per thread).

System proposing wrong quantity while doing Place in storage(305)

hi gurus'
Am having a issue.
I have removed 100 units of material X from plant Y using movement type 303.(transfer posting).
Then i did movement type 305(place in storage) in plant Y for 75 units refering the earlier document.
After that when am trying to do the place in storage again for 100 units( when the system should allow only remaining 25 units), the document is getting posted without even an error message.
Any solution for dis so that system proposes the correct quantity??
Plz help me guruz. Its URGENT!!!!!!
Thanks in advance.Points will be awarded if the solution is helpful.

Hi
It comes from Message Class M7 022 numbered message..
I guess the message in your system is a warning message (W) most probably,
so you should make it an error message (E), to that the above is not allowed.
You can do the customization via following:
SPRO>Materials Management>Inventory Management and Physical Inventory>Define Attributes of System Messages>Settings for System Messages
Change mode
and
Version:00
Area:M7
Message:022
Change The Message category from W warning to E Error
Best Regards
Hope this helps
Please reward if found useful

While doing MIGO system giving error massage "No account was specified for account type "D" in item "0000000001"

Hello,
While doing MIGO system showing error " No account was specified for account type "D" in item "0000000001"
Kindly help me to resolve this issue.
Regards,
Abhijit

Hi,
Your issue seems to be an issue in FI. Refer the similar thread: MIGO error for UNBW material and the note: 1027645 - Message F5670: Account not specified in item X
Found a similar issue in J1IS as explained in the KBA: 1932095 - Error : F5670 - ' No account is specified in item 0000000002 ' - in transaction J1IS
Regards,
AKPT

Can system consider the unrestricted stock when planned with MD50???

Hi,
We have scinerio where FERT with Strategy 20 (MTO Process) is planned with MD50 against the sale oder. Every time Dependent items stock needs to be posted with Movement type 412E against that sale order or else dependent items stock though available in unrestricted is shown as unable against that sale order no. Enitre cost of the FERT material is accounted against sale order number.
Can we avoid posting of sales order stock?? can we make system to consider the unrestricted stock when planned with MD50.
Thanks in advance,
Regards,
John

if u want to consume the unrestricted stock, why u implemented MTO??
what was the requirement to implement MTO, when u r asking such question in support............
check first requirement of the client.......if u think they need to consume unresc stock...i will say...implentation was very poor,
regards,
Pravin M

To Unrestricted instead of Blocked stock.

Hi Gurus,
I am having a Non-Valuated material.
when i do GR for a plant it is going to Unrestricted stock.for another plant the same material it is going to blocked stock.i want that,the smae shud go to Unrestricted stock only.please advice customisings to be done for this.
Thanks and Regards,
Senthil Kumar.

Hi,
The requirement can be met with the following ways.
1.You can maintain the setting post to unrestricted at MIGO in the personnel settings for the movement type.
2.You can set this in the delivery tab of PO.
3.Do not check the box 'post to inspection stock ' in the MMR.
4.Or while posting at MIGO post to unrestricted stock.
Regards,

Source system changed to BI instead of R/3 after system copy

Hi All,
We have done system copy of R/3 and BW from production to test.
After doing the post process the R/3 test source system in BI become as business ware house system and showing under the tree of BI.
Due to that all data sources are not active. Could any one help me in this case.
Thanks & Regards
Srini

Dear Srinivas,
You have to restore the Source system connection in BI. There are few steps you have to do before that.
you have to make both R/3 and BI system as modifiable and do the procedures as mentioned in the SAP Notes 1087980.
Once these both steps were done, please right click on your source system connection in BI.
please validate all the passwords there and it will navigate to R/3 SM59 RFC connection. There you have to check all the credentials whether it is correct or not. once it done. plz save it and get back to BI source system connection.
Replicate the meta data and activate the data sources and transfer structures.
After all these steps, right click once again on your source system connection and click Check.
Here source system connection will be OK.
Hope this would give you clear pic on your issue.
Edited by: Mohan Kumar on Jun 25, 2009 10:52 AM

From where the systeme proposes the Delivery date in the PO

Dear All,
Please let me know from where the Delivery date gets proposed in the PO?
It is not releated to the MRP views parameters, isn't it?
Regards
Ahmad

yes it is right its in MRP but can be used for both external and internal procurement. but if that material is not subjected to MRP then you can also define the planned delivery time in vendor master purcahsing view.
regards,
qsm sap

[KDE] amarok system tray icon opens instead in window

Apologies if this has been answered; I really wasn't sure the correct search terms to use, which is really the most important part in solving any problem.
So, I'm a six-month Kubuntu (and Linux) user switching to Arch because, well, I wanted more control over what I had installed on my system. That, and the fact that the *buntu distro maintainers won't update the NVIDIA driver, even though the one in there doesn't work with the kernel shipped with Hardy... anyways.
I always have amarok open, but when I boot up, I get the amarok icon in the top-left corner (looking like this), rather than in the system tray. Usually closing and reopening will produce the desired effect.
However, I would like for this to work properly without having to close and reopen, since that negates the benefit of having it start automatically. I'm thinking that perhaps I should write a script that will close it on logout and open on login?

Not a solution but a workarround, i don't use saved sessions in kde and have a script in ~/.kde/Autostart with things I want to start, might as well try that

Unrestricted stock with Migo for quality-inspect materials

Dear MM Gurus,
We have a case, for some vendors(between cross company sales) we want to have the materials posted to the unrestricted stock.
We have changes the stock type form quality inspect stock to unrestricted stock during purchase order creation with MM badi purchase_custom.Now it's ok and when go to migo, it seems also unrestricted stock.After saving the migo screen, checked the material document, it seems again quality inspect stock.
What happens seems that, the system before saving checks the material master and sees the quality inspect type there selected.
What we need here is to deactivate this during migo also.Could you please suggest us a userexit-badi to deactivate the quality data of the material so that the stock type is unrestricted.
Thanx in advance
Best regards
Jack Black

Hi,
I suggest as per the scenario as if want to go for particular vendors with material combination for quality inspection and for other vendors with material combination for stock type unrestricted.
I suggest not to go for any user exits.
You have two options
1. While creating purchase you can change the stock type in item detail in delivery tab pag e by selecting the desired stocktype for the vendor material combination. For this you need to uncheck the tick mark for quality inspecion for the material in the materila master record.
2. You can tick the material subject to quality inspection in materila master as it is which willbe defaulted and appear as read only while craeting purchase order for all your vendors. After doing the goods reciept you can tranfer the stock from quality inspection to unrestricted with movement type 343.
Regards,
Tushar Patankar

Subcon PO: Can system change the qty proposed for backflush during GR?

Scenario:
We have a Subassy A (qty=1) which requires Component A (qty =8). We have component scrap maintained as 25% in the BOM.
When we create the PO with qty as shown below, the following qty is proposed for the component A (80*1.25 = 100) due to component scrap.
Subcontract PO with item cat L - Subassy A : qty = 10
Component proposed is - Component A : 100
During GR we (101) the Subaasy A: qty = 10
We backflush (543) the Component A qty =80 (system proposes qty =100 but we change it to 80.00)
In subsquent adjustment, MB04 we consume/backflush (543) the additional issued components.
Problem:
IS it possible to have the system propose the component A qty as per the BOM ie (80 for 10 Subassy A parts)
so that inventory control does not have to change the proposed qty during GR.
Thank you in advance.

Hi,
You should try this.
Create an entry sheet in which planned services are defaulted from the purchase order. You can determine the quantities suggested from the PO by specifying percentages (Entry sheet -> Create -> With planned services).
Cheers !

Cost Center code proposed by system

Hi Friends,
Is there any option that system propose sequential internal code at the time of cost center creation?
Now you are aware if you create cost center through KS01 you can put anything for cost center code. Do you don't think some control should be there like GL master creation?
Regards,
DJ.

Hi
If you are usng BW - better develop the report from there... Else, ABAP is the only solution
Note that there is no correlation between Plant & Cost center except work center... Hence, Plant as an Input parameter in a cost center report is not possible.... Thats why, people prefer to have a cost center nomenclature that reflects the Plant No as well i.e. say 1st 4 chars of a Cost center name can resemble plant
br, Ajay M

Change SU proposed by the system in the TO confirmation.

Hi gurus...
I have the following problem.Scenario: I am doing the picking in two steps, I have activated the SUs management in the intermediate warehouse type of the picking in two steps.
Issue: When I create the TO, the system assigns a destination SU, nonetheless, I need to assign that SU (external) in the confirmation (because in that moment I stick the pre-printed label in the pallet.) I do not see the way to modify the SU DESTINATION that the system proposes.
I also thought of using the assignation of HUs, but it is not possible in the first step of the picking in two steps (movement 850), it is only possible in the movement 916.
Please I apreciated your help!!!!
Thanks in advance
Gloria

Still I can't understand your business process...
What I may understand is that you want to pack the goods when they are removed from normal storage type into 2-step picking interim storage type.
I think you should give up to force this thing with your current settings. I'm saying this because based on your description, for your WH (or more exactly for you storage location(s) which is (are) assigned to your WH) HUM requirement is not set.
That's why there's no connection between WM and HUM and you cannot manage the packing within WM.
If you use WM with HUM your problem will be solved automatically. When confirming the withdrawal TO (which removes the goods from normal storage type to storage type 200) you can pack the goods into HUs (whether you create the HUs in advance or at the time of confirmation).
So, I suggest that you should give up what you are doing now (set SUM for interim storage type 200...) and test the whole process with WM&HUM whether it suits your requirment
Edited by: Csaba Szommer on Apr 12, 2011 11:08 PM

System is not receiving partial quantity in MIGO.

Hi Everyone
During receiving the partial quantity in MIGo,system gives me following error.
Deficit of PU Ordered quantity 5 BAG : 2000380 1000 1002 GREEN TIP
Can u please tell me to get rid of this error so that the system could receive the partial quantity against PO in MIGo
Regards:Vijay

Hi,
Check on it:-
partial gr quantity can be cancelled or reversed
SAP MIGO Partial Goods Receipt of a PO then after close PO
pherasath

Changing of Proposed SLED in MIGO

Dear all,
I have defined SLED in days in the material master for a particular FG. When I try to do a GI/GR for that specific material, system proposed a date for the SLED field. If I try to change the proposed SLED, system issues a warning message, saying that it will change back the date to the original. If I dont mind the warning and change it back to my desired date, upon posting of that batch, it automatically gets the system proposed date, even if I have already changed it. Where can I configure this so that I can input a date of my own, which is different from the system proposal?

There is no config or standard setting to do this. you have to go for your custom code. Use user exit:EXIT_SAPVBMD_001
Basically, you have to supress the re calculation of expiration date if it's entered by the user, calculate if no expiration date is entered.
Your logic should be as follows:
1.If an Expiration Date is entered, use the entered date and suppress re-calculation
2.Issue a warning message if the calculated date does not match the entered date (standard stuff)
3.If no Expiration Date is not entered, Calculate one based on Date Of Manufacture and Material Master SLED data (per standard function)
Hope it helps.
Thanks,
Ram

MIGO : System propose in unrestricted Instead of QC.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for