Migration objects from 3.5 to 7.0

Hello experts,
if in an upgrade scenario I decide to mantain in 3.5 version some objects (infosources, update rules, etc.), when I decide to migrate them to BI 7.0 version, and I do it in development environment, there is the possibility to transport this "switch" with a change request or I must do the same operation in target environment (quality and/or production)?
Thanls in advance.
Regards.

Hi,
You dont have to perform the same operation in QA or production .. .SAP recomands to transport the changes rather than doing it all over again..You should transport the changes ..
Regards,
Viren.

Similar Messages

Migrate objects from ALUI 6.0 to WCI 10g?

Is it possible to use the migration tool to export objects from an ALUI 6.0 portal and import them into a WCI 10g portal?

No, migration needs to happen between same versions. You'll need to upgrade your first 6.0 instance to 10g then migrate objects from there to your other 10g instance.

Error while migrating object from PI 7.0 to pi 7.1

Hi All,
I am migrating IR and ID object from PI 7.0 to PI 7.1 using file system.
IR oject got imported sucessfully in ESR but ID after importing when i tried to activate the objects in change list i am facing the following error. Does anyone have any idea about the error.
Internal error while checking object Communication Channel: | XIXREF_C | File_FileXref_Sender_XrefFlat_CC; see details++
Attempt to access the 1 requested objects on 1 failed
Detailed information:
com.sap.aii.ib.core.roa.RoaObjectAccessException:
Attempt to read object Adapter Metadata File | http://sap.com/xi/XI/System,
type AdapterMetaData from application REPOSITORY on++
system REPOSITORY failed. Object does not exist. Detailed
informatio n: Software component version with key ID:
b38bcd00e47111d7afacde420a1145a5 not found (ROA_MOA_NOTCOMPLETED)
Thanks
Kasturika Phukan

Hi Kasturika,
Check whether the metadata for the particular adapter in the BASIS SWCV exists or not.
I hope you are refering to the following guide while transferring from PI 7.0 to PI 7.1
[Move Scenarios from 7.0 to 7.1|http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/index?rid=/library/uuid/90baf3dd-dbf9-2b10-47aa-ac5f56bb5030]
Regards,
Gautam Purohit

Migrating objects from PS8.0 to PS9.0

If I want to migrate some of my objects from PS8.0 to PS 9.0 what would be or what alternatives are there to make this happen?
Would I have to recreate my objects in 9.0 from scratch or is there an easier way to migrate?

1. If the objects are created by developers then it is better to migrate the objects as it as to higher versions.
2. It is always better to upgrade project by project, take for an example you have a project XYZ in 8.0 version with 10 objects.
a. If 2 objects are newly created by developers then those need to be migrated to 9.0
as it is.
b. If the objects are delivered objects then first you need to compare two applications
and generate compare report.
c. After generating the reports, you need to analyze the report and based on your
analysis you need to retrofit the customizations according to your requirements.
Jayaprakash Tedla

Migrating objects from BO 4.0 to Bo 4.1

Hi,
We are getting problem in migrating the contents from BO 4.0 to Bo 4.1 as the old environment has BODS
and the new environment doesn’t have it. We are using promtion management and export/import LCMBIAR file.
If securiuty is selected we get an error.
SAP has suggested the below note:
1918080 - When trying to import an LCMBIAR file from Production to Test server it fails with
"AjaxRequestThrowsError :True"
Could you please let us know your views on the doing the below options to resolve the error.
Uninstall BODS from BO 4.0 and install it as a separate CMS.
OR
Add BODS in BO 4.1also.
Thanks,
Rajiv

Hi,
While migrating using promotion management, you can select manually which applications you need. One option is to avoid including DS while doing the promotion. Have you tried that?
Do you need BODS? If so, Instead of uninstalling BODS in 4.0, it would be ideal to install BODS 4.1 in CMS.
Arun

Migration tool for migrate MII objects from 11.5 to 12.1

Hi All,
We can use any of the tools SP01/02/03/04 for migrate MII objects from 11.5 to 12.0.
Our requirement is to migrate MII objects from 11.5 to 12.1.
Can we use the same tool to accomplish our requiremnt ? Or is there any other tool for this?
Please suggest me on this.Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Manisha

Thanks Jamie.I got it.upgrade guides located at http://service.sap.com/instguides -> SAP Business Suite Applications -> SAP Manufacturing -> SAP MII.
Thanks,
Manisha

Migrate JOB objects from datastore to another

Hi all,
Please, how can I migrate JOB objects from datastore to another ???
Edited by: omar.elid on Dec 6, 2011 12:29 PM

If you are talking about changing the connection / source target database in multiple environments, you can have multiple data store configurations.
You can right click a data store, Edit , Advanaced , Edit. At the top, you have Duplicate configuration / Create New configuration.
Create multiple configurations as per multiple environments and set the Default to "Yes" as per your environment.
For migrating jobs from one repository to another.
In Designer, go to Tools>Export
In to the "Objects to Export" window, drag and drop the objects that you want to export from the "Local Object Library".
Right click on the export window and choose Export. Give the database credentials of the Target Repository (repository into which you want to export the objects). Click Next, change the Target status of the dependent objects to "Exclude" if you do not want to migrate them.
Regards,
Suneer

How to get BW Objects not optmized for HANA on just migrated System from ORA to HANA?

http://www.saphana.com/servlet/JiveServlet/previewBody/1363-102-2-1810/SDN_HANA_opt_InfoCube%20FINAL.PDF
HI .....HANA Experts
We are early birds for HANA Technology !!!
The above link is showing how to convert and limitations etc.
We just migrated BW from Oracle to HANA.
Our experts converted some BW Obejcts to HANA Optimized , some still open.
Q1) In this juncture, to take the current stcok, Do we have any report which extract directly list of BW objects which are still not optimized for HANA.
Q2) How to get list of tables not yet fully loaded into Memory [or] How to get list of Infocubes & DSO's not yet fully loaded into main memeory
Q3) When we optimize objects - The size in memeory & persistance store - Size is increasing - Is it normal behaviour ?
Rgds
PR
PR Srinivas

Hi,
PR Srinivas wrote:
We just migrated BW from Oracle to HANA.
Our experts converted some BW Obejcts to HANA Optimized , some still open.
---- DSOs should not be converted. If you still want to please check RSODSO Table and check the column IMOFL (HANA Optimized setting for the DSO).
For the InfoCubes, please refer to RSDCUBE table and CUBESUBTYPE column with value F for HANA optimized setting.
Q1) In this juncture, to take the current stcok, Do we have any report which extract directly list of BW objects which are still not optimized for HANA.
Q2) How to get list of tables not yet fully loaded into Memory [or] How to get list of Infocubes & DSO's not yet fully loaded into main memeory
Please check m_cs_tables to know which tables are loaded to memory and which are not.(Refer to LOADED column).
Q3) When we optimize objects - The size in memeory & persistance store - Size is increasing - Is it normal behaviour ?
Please check the Delta memory and perform Delta Merge. Please search on SCN to get the details on the same.
Rgds
PR
PR Srinivas

Migrating ODI objects from one environment to another

Hi,
This is for the first time that i am trying to migrate odi objects from one environment to another. I am facing issue and requesting help.
The odi installation is the part of ASCP module of JDEdwards where some standard objects (interfaces/packages) are already created. I have developed some custom interfaces and want to migrate the same to QA environment.
I exported the specific folder (including children) to an xml file and then trying to import the same in the QA environment.
When i choose "Synonym Insert_Update" option to import is prompts error :
You are importing an object from another repository with same identifier. This is forbidden
This is completely new folder which do not exist on target. If I import using Duplication option, it successfully import and assigns new internal ID to object (which is as expected). But how will I update the newly created object in future ?
What should be followed to migrate objects ?

user8628169 wrote:
Hi,
This is for the first time that i am trying to migrate odi objects from one environment to another. I am facing issue and requesting help.
The odi installation is the part of ASCP module of JDEdwards where some standard objects (interfaces/packages) are already created. I have developed some custom interfaces and want to migrate the same to QA environment.
I exported the specific folder (including children) to an xml file and then trying to import the same in the QA environment.
When i choose "Synonym Insert_Update" option to import is prompts error :
You are importing an object from another repository with same identifier. This is forbidden
recreate your OA repository with repository id different from your DEV repository.
Then you should not get this problem.
This is completely new folder which do not exist on target. If I import using Duplication option, it successfully import and assigns new internal ID to object (which is as expected). But how will I update the newly created object in future ?
What should be followed to migrate objects ?

Migration tool to migrate xmii objects from 11.5 to 12.0

Hi All,
I am looking for the migration tool to migrate xmii objects from 11.5 to 12.0.
There are many downlodable for migration tool MII 12.0 like " XMII 12.0 Migration Tool SP04/03/02...".
Can you please suggest which one to use for .
I am having MII12.0.2 build 88 .
Thanks in advance
Ketan

Hi Ketan,
You can use any of the tools SP1/2/3/4 for migrate xmii objects from 11.5 to 12.0.
Thanks,
Manisha

Migrating Content from a Custom ASP Page to a SharePoint Page Layout. Includes object tags to flash CSS images

Hi Guys,
I'm currently getting issues when trying to migrate content from ASP Pages used in a custom intranet developed by a client to SharePoint Pages.
My current strategy to do so is as per below:
a. Create ASPX Pages in Page Library with SharePoint Designer
b. Copy all common resource files needed by the pages within the Pages library. Includes folders for Javascript, CSS, images etc. This way relative address of resources in pages will pick up pages library as default folder
for resources.
c. Copy Source Code of Page from Browser by right-clicking ‘View Page Source’/ Copy code from .asp file
d. Clean the code to remove unnecessary codes from SharePoint Pages.
At this point page renders without SharePoint Branding.
However if I apply SharePoint Master Page onto the ASPX page by using Style > Attach > Default Master Page, this generates an Error when the page renders.
What is missing in this approach or what would be the best approach to migrate the page to SharePoint without code solution?
Grateful if you could help.
Thanks
Rhyan.

Hi Rhyan,
As I understand, you want to create a custom application page in SharePoint 2013.
If you copy the code in the asp page to aspx page, it cannot work. You should write the new code that can work in the asp file for the SharePoint aspx page.
There is a similar case:
https://social.technet.microsoft.com/forums/sharepoint/en-US/0a97820a-59b9-4430-a98c-d2941803c38e/classic-asp-pages-to-sharepoint-pages-migration
You can create a web application page in the visual studio. You also can explicitly change which master page is used by the application page by setting the MasterPageFile attribute of the application Page element. (For example: MasterPageFile="~/_layouts/applicationv4.master").
The articles below are about creating application Pages for SharePoint.
https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee231581.aspx
http://nikpatel.net/2012/01/20/custom-sharepoint-pages-site-pages-vs-application-pages/
Best regards,
Sara Fan
TechNet Community Support
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help, and unmark the answers if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact
[email protected]

Copying objects from Illustrator CS3 to FreeHand 11.0.2

Working on a Mac in OSX 10.4.11, I was able to select and copy objects in an open Illustrator CS2 file and paste them into an open FreeHand 11.0.2 file, where they would be fully editable. After migrating to OSX 10.6.2 and upgrading to CS3, this no longer works - the objects selected and copied from Illustrator either do not appear (only corner indicators are visible) or a pale version appears as an uneditable low-rez image with funny colors....
Because there are so many missing features in Illustrator, it's important for me to be able to work back and forth between the two apps. Has anyone been able to achieve this (formerly) simple interactivity?

I got the following post from Danny Haas:
If you go to Edit>Special>Paste Special and then select AI/EPS from the list
it should paste just fine. It works well for me.
Worked for me too, although text was not imported as editable text. To do
that had to special paste the text separately as unformatted text, and then
reformat in FH.
From: Judy_Arndt <[email protected]>
Reply-To: <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 17:19:27 -0700
To: PETER AGOOS <[email protected]>
Subject: Copying objects from Illustrator CS3 to FreeHand 11.0.2
I skipped AICS3, but now use AICS4 for some tasks.
The only solution I've found is to save the AI CS4 file as AI 8, open that
in FHMX and copy from there.

Migrating portal from 10g to 11g

Hi,
We are in the process of upgrading oracle mid tier from 10gAS to OFMW 11g and also migrating it from Solaris to Linux.
With regard the portal migration from OAS 10g to OFMW 11g
1) Is it possible to migrate portal objects from 10g (solaris) to a new install of OFMW portal 11g(linux) directly OR do we have to upgrade the existing OAS 10g to OFMW portal 11g (on Solaris) and then migrate the portal objects to OFMW Portal 11g (on Linux)
I am new to portal migration. Any suggestions and additional details would be appreciated.
Thanks
RB

Migration + upgrade in one shot is do-able, because upgrade will require a sequence of processes but they will be mostly based on repository upgrade, and hence will be transparent to the OS you are using.
However, in practice, the standard rule-of-thumb is that you avoid dealing with multiple layers of complications in a single shot. That means, you break complications in such steps where you could recognize the sources of any later errors/problems you encounter.
hope that helps!
AMN

How to only migrate data from SQL Server 2008 to Oracle 11?

According to our requirement, We need to only migrate data from a SQL Server database to an existed
Oracle database user.
1) I tried to do it with SQL Developer 3.0.04 Migration Wizard, But find an issue.
My SQL Server database name is SCDS41P2, and my Oracle database user name is CDS41P2;
When I used SQL Developer to do offline move data by Migration Wizard, I found all oracle user
name in movedata files which gotten by run Migration Wizard
is dbo_SCDS41P2. If the Oracle user name is not the same as my existed Oracle user name,
the data can't be moved to my existed Oracle user when I run oracle_ctl.bat in command line window.
So I had to modify the Oracle user name in all movedata files, but it's difficult to modify them because there are many tables in
databases. So could you please tell me how to get the movedata files which the oracle user name in them is my
expected Oracle user name?
2) I also tried to use the 'copy to Oracle' function to copy the SQL Server database tables data
to the existed Oracle database user. When clicked 'copy to Oracle', I selected 'Include Data' and 'Replace' option
But I found some tables can't be copied, the error info is as below:
Table SPSSCMOR_CONTROLTABLE Failed. Message: ORA-00955: name is already used by an existing object
Could you please tell me how to deal with this kind of error?
Thanks!
Edited by: 870587 on Jul 6, 2011 2:57 AM

Hi,
Thanks for you replying. But the 'copy to oracle' function still can't be work well. I will give some info about the table. I also search 'SPSSCMOR_CONTROLTABLE' in the target schema, and only find one object. So why say 'name is already used by an existing object'? Could you please give me some advice? Thanks!
What is the 'Build' version of your SQL*Developer ?
[Answer]:
3.0.04
- what does describe show for the SPSSCMOR_CONTROLTABLE in SQL*Server ?
[Answer]:
USE [SCDS41P2]
GO
/****** Object: Table [dbo].[SPSSCMOR_CONTROLTABLE] Script Date: 07/18/2011 01:25:05 ******/
SET ANSI_NULLS ON
GO
SET QUOTED_IDENTIFIER ON
GO
CREATE TABLE [dbo].[SPSSCMOR_CONTROLTABLE](
     [tablename] [nvarchar](128) NOT NULL,
PRIMARY KEY CLUSTERED
     [tablename] ASC
)WITH (PAD_INDEX = OFF, STATISTICS_NORECOMPUTE = OFF, IGNORE_DUP_KEY = OFF, ALLOW_ROW_LOCKS = ON, ALLOW_PAGE_LOCKS = ON) ON [PRIMARY]
) ON [PRIMARY]
GO
- what does describe show for the SPSSCMOR_CONTROLTABLE in Oracle ?
[Answer]:
-- File created - Monday-July-18-2011
-- DDL for Table SPSSCMOR_CONTROLTABLE
CREATE TABLE "CDS41P2"."SPSSCMOR_CONTROLTABLE"
(     "TABLENAME" NVARCHAR2(128)
) PCTFREE 10 PCTUSED 40 INITRANS 1 MAXTRANS 255 NOCOMPRESS LOGGING
STORAGE(INITIAL 65536 NEXT 1048576 MINEXTENTS 1 MAXEXTENTS 2147483645
PCTINCREASE 0 FREELISTS 1 FREELIST GROUPS 1 BUFFER_POOL DEFAULT)
TABLESPACE "USERS" ;
-- DDL for Index SYS_C009547
CREATE UNIQUE INDEX "CDS41P2"."SYS_C009547" ON "CDS41P2"."SPSSCMOR_CONTROLTABLE" ("TABLENAME")
PCTFREE 10 INITRANS 2 MAXTRANS 255 COMPUTE STATISTICS
STORAGE(INITIAL 65536 NEXT 1048576 MINEXTENTS 1 MAXEXTENTS 2147483645
PCTINCREASE 0 FREELISTS 1 FREELIST GROUPS 1 BUFFER_POOL DEFAULT)
TABLESPACE "USERS" ;
-- Constraints for Table SPSSCMOR_CONTROLTABLE
ALTER TABLE "CDS41P2"."SPSSCMOR_CONTROLTABLE" MODIFY ("TABLENAME" NOT NULL ENABLE);
ALTER TABLE "CDS41P2"."SPSSCMOR_CONTROLTABLE" ADD PRIMARY KEY ("TABLENAME")
USING INDEX PCTFREE 10 INITRANS 2 MAXTRANS 255 COMPUTE STATISTICS
STORAGE(INITIAL 65536 NEXT 1048576 MINEXTENTS 1 MAXEXTENTS 2147483645
PCTINCREASE 0 FREELISTS 1 FREELIST GROUPS 1 BUFFER_POOL DEFAULT)
TABLESPACE "USERS" ENABLE;
Edited by: 870587 on Jul 18, 2011 1:42 AM

Reasons Adobe should write a migration manual from FH to AI

what my friend wrote me...
About FHMX, how about educating people why Freehand is so
much better than
ill, and publishing a migration guide from ill to Freehand.
Maybe you and I
can join Adobe and implement this program! As a matter of
fact I've already
written the introduction to the guide.
Top reasons why I love using Freehand MX over Illustrator for
the work we
do. Try it, and you'll like it too.
•Gouping and ungrouping is time consuming in ill. If an
object on the bottom
is grouped, the whole group is selected. Selecting the bottom
object is
useless unless you ungroup all. Very time consuming.
Freehand can select one element even if it's part of a group.
• It is common in ill & FHMX to hold down shift
while clicking on objects to
select several at a time. ill has a tendency to 'pick up'
& move those
objects as your moving from one to the other. Which means
having to back up
your last step and then continue.
•• ill select/same/stroke colour, fill colour
etc. VS FHMX 'find & replace'
In ill available only 'document wide' which forces you to
take the selection
and place it in a new document (usually a temporary measure
ill forces upon
you).
All this copying takes extra time when the art is complex.
Since changing colours is often the goal, opening a new
document means
having to drag into the new doc, all the colours you'll be
needing to
change.
Also when choosing same fill & stroke colour, ill doesn't
catch everything,
so you have to try several times to get everything.
FHMXs 'find & replace' runs on whatever you select,
without requiring
copying
the info to a new document, so there is no waiting like in
ill. And it
catches everything all in one shot. Wham, bam thank you maam.
FHMXs 'find &
replace' light years ahead of ill.
• Multiple page documents
FHMX multi page documents can be of different sizes and
orientation within a
single document. Ill must have the same size and orientation.
Ill allows only one page size & page format while FHMX
permits you to use
any combo within the same document, all with the click of a
button. Job's
done.
ill: go into doc setup and calculate new overall width.
"let's see I need 5 pages of 8.5x11 so that's 8.5" x 5 pages
=42.5" width.
If you add a page, all the doc info gets shifted off center.
Ill requires
you to select all, (make sure nothing is locked!) and
recenter all the
pages. All time consuming and unnecessary in FHMX.
Ill can't handle multiple pages when it come time to print
them all. In
order to be able to print an 8 page document with simple
vector art (without
any linked files) in illustrator, it was necessary to convert
the document
to 8 single page documents. Each page took 5 minutes , 40 min
total.
FHMX prints multiple page documents with no hesitation.
••ill has no collect for output. This is
ridiculous. FHMX enables you to
enjoy creating freely without having to think of where that
tiff you just
imported came from. When the art is finished in FH, click
'collect for
output' and in under 5 seconds a complete folder is created
of everything
you need to backup that artwork.
Never spend one second looking for anything again when
opening a freehand
document. Not today, not tomorrow, or in three months.
In ill, after the art is done, you need to spend the time
looking for those
linked files, to gather them into a folder. And when a
deadline is so
important, will you actually take the time? NO! So days,
weeks, or months
later, when you need to open the file and the tiff is
missing, well, I hope
you like treasure hunts, because with time tiffs can be moved
or go missing.
With this one feature, FH saves hours of time per year over
ill.
•Pathfinder/combine in ill is slow ad often crashes the
program. (See next
point) Freehand unite is Fast!. ill requires you to ungroup
all elements
before using the filter. FHMX doesn't.
••Paste inside.
FHMX enables you to use garment sketches without modifying
shapes to
accommodate a tiff pasted inside. Tons less work over ill.
'Paste inside' in
FHMX is fast & effortless, encouraging you to paste
inside each individual
shape of the garment. (Ex. Belt loops, waistband, pockets,
body. All get
their own tiff pasted inside.) This gives the artist freedom
over each
individual tiff. Changes can be applied in light/dark or
angle to each tiff
seperatly from one another.
Ill cannot do this without a massive investment in time, it
doesn't even
compare with the ease of FHMX. ill method is also a pain to
work with ,
requiring you to lock/unlock items as the masks bounding box
is often in the
way. This requires you to lock nearby elements in order
select. Very
annoying. This work around is so time consuming it
discourages you to paste
inside individual shapes. In fact it's impractical to do so.
You're forced
to combine all shapes and paste one tiff into this one
overall shape, which
is time consuming because it increase your workload to
achieve a lesser
result.
Ill requires you to draw a duplicate shape which must lie in
perfect
register with the shape underneath it. Shapes are often
composed of highly
complex components (ex:text) that need to be united into one
overall shape,
to paste into. Often these complex shapes crash illustrators
unite filter,
making the job time consuming or impossible. FHMX requires
none of this
workaround, because FHMX enables you to past into individual
shapes.
FHMX can even paste inside a paste inside, and in easily
accesible layers,
creating realistic effects. Don't even dream of doing this in
ill.
•ill toolbox. The 'Venus' girl at the top of the box is
often clicked in
error resulting in an annoying 'Adobe online' dialogue box
appearing. So
annoying! Bury this feature elsewhere, or at least move it
away from the two
arrow tools, the two most used tools of the whole program!
Stop interrupting
workflow!
•Ill locking unlocking frenzy
You'd like to add a point to a path. In FHMX, select the path
and click on
it
with the pen tool. You're done.
In ill, select the path and click on it with the pen tool +.
But ill adds
the point to the path in front, even though you selected the
one in back!
Ill forces you to lock the front path to get to the rear
path. If your
artwork has many layered paths, get ready to go on the usual
locking frenzy
until you get to the path you need. All this just to add a
point.
As an added bonus, ill often throws the "Can't add an anchor
point. Please
use the add anchor point tool on a segment of a path"
dialogue box in your
face, as if you can't aim a point on a path.
Paste inside
• Because paste inside in ill is so complicated, a
common workaround is to
create a pattern swatch to achieve the same ease as in FHMX.
However pattern
swatches are simple vector paths that can't match the
subtlety of a tiff.
When opening a new document, swatches have to be brought in
to the new
document to be used.. When changing a pattern colour, a new
swatch has to be
created, which is more time consuming than changing the tiff
colour in FHMX.
5 seconds vs. 5 minutes
• The arrow+ tool in Ill selects in increments of one
group at a time. FHMX
selects in increments of one element at a time, giving the
user greater
control over elements within groups.
• In Ill before using Pathfinder/Unite, you should
save, because pathfinder
tool often crashes the program. Since large documents take
time to save,
waiting time in Ill multiplies. FHMX doesn't crash when using
the pathfinder
tool so much time and frustration is saved.
Sometimes Pathfinder in Ill just won't work the way it's
expected to. I wind
up importing the art into FHMX where it works fine and
instantly.

I think what Morty said needs to be reminded here:
quote:
quote:
Should we read anything into Adobe putting out the Freehand
to
Illustrator migration guide you posted about?
No, that's something that Adobe has planned for quite some
time. I hinted to its release several months back when we were all
discussing how Adobe should produce such a document. This "rumor"
that I refer to is something that surprised me as well. I have yet
to confirm it though...
Mordy
Since Adobe was planning this for some time, let's not jump
to conclusions. Mordy did confirm to us that there is indeed a
Product Manager for FreeHand. Also, it's interesting to note that
Adobe has a different situation on their hands than they did with
Pagemaker. What we have is two competing (?) programs, FH and Illy,
they are both truly loved by their devoted users. Adobe probably
realizes that they gave to keep both because the users of either
program have been devoted for years. Neither Illy or FH users would
be happy about migrating. Adobe I'm sure will keep both programs
(at least I'm hoping they are smart enough to). When Adobe migrated
Pagemaker users to InDesign, InDesign was a new tool. Illy is old
like FH...you ca't force a migration to a tool that is just as old
as the one your migrating from.

Migration objects from 3.5 to 7.0

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for