Migration of BUPAs and business agreements

Hello,
Its my first thread and my English is not so good but i hope you can understand my problem.
We have to migrate BUPAs from an NON-SAP system to an SAP CRM 7.0.
We use the LSMW for this with IDOC Basic type CRMXIF_PARTNER_SAVE01.
This is okay and works good.
But we also have to create an business agreement for each of this migrate BUPA and this is a little bit tricky.
So i know that there also an IDOC type for this but i want to link this creation to the migration of the BUPAs.
That means i want to migrate one BUPA and after a successful migration of one BUPA i want to create his business agreement and so on.
So how can i do this?
Thx for help

No Idea? Or is my english to bad to understand?
Br,
Silvio

Similar Messages

Error: Contract object and business agreement do not match

Dear Friends,
I get this error on the service order.
Contract object and business agreement do not match
Any assistance would be appreciated.
Thanks and regards,
Aershid

Thanks Experts...
Sany.

To Get Busines Agreement Class and Business Agreement Number

Hi Experts
We need to find out Business Agreement Class and Businees Agreement number from Business Partner.
we have CRM Contract, CRM contract can have different line items which is stored in crmd_orderadm_i table. How can I use Product Guid to find out business agreement class and business agrement number.
Thanks & Regards
Sandeep

Hi
U can find these in the Master Table
CRMM_BUAG Master table for Business Agreement
CRMM_BUAG_H Header Data for Business Agreement such as Tax Category, Tax Characteristic, Form key, Business Agreement Class. Data in this table correspond to ISU
Regards
Manohar

Crm middleware : R/3-ISU to CRM Business agreements and Contract accounts

Hi Guys
We are Downloading BP data from R/3 ISU system to CRM system and I did the relevant customizations using setup and load guide, along with the BP data it is required to download <b>Business agreements and contract accounts (BDOC buag_main) also for this download I don't have any idea about what customizations to do</b> to download BUAG_MAIN does any one have the document which specifies the required custmizations for downloading Business partner agreements.
My id : [email protected]
Thanks in advance
Warm regards
Rajasekhar

Hi Madhu,
Contract Account on ISU is Business Agreement on CRM. Please refer the following path to get the load guide for contract account.
The SAP Service Marketplace, http://service.sap.com/utilities => Product Information => mySAP CRM for Utilities => Cookbooks & Guidelines => IS-U Specific Set-Up and Load Guide for Business Agreement / Contract Account.
<b>Reward points if it helps.</b>

Parties, Business Systems and Business Services

Hi guys,
I've read a lot about items in subject, but have some doubts about applying them to my scenario. I have to integrate SAP system and web service.
As far as I understand concepts, this is B2B communication, so I have to use parties. To represent SAP system I use Business System, as it's described ins SLD, and for Web service I use Business Service... just as we use business services for web services
--- Am I right here? Will it work ok in reciever determination, agreement?
Thank you.

Hi,
You are doing the usage of business systems and services in proper way.
The scenario will difinately work with combination of business system and service.
It will be fine for all other configurations such as Receiver Determination, Sender/receiver agreements and interface determination etc.
Please see below the importance of Parties, Business Systems and Business Services
A communication party
A communication party (party for short) represents a larger unit, which is involved in a collaborative process. Using a communication party, you generally address a company within a cross-company process.
You can assign a communication party one or more services to address it as the sender or receiver of messages.
A business system
If you want to address a particular business system as the sender or receiver of messages, choose this service type.
A business system is an actual application system in a system landscape. A business system (service) comprises information about the inbound and outbound interfaces and the software component versions of the business system.
You usually use business system services when configuring internal company processes.
A business service
If you want to address an abstract business entity as the sender or receiver of messages, choose this service type.
Using a business service, you can define the technical or business subunits of the companies involved and then assign them the relevant interfaces.
You usually use business services when configuring cross-company processes. In this case, you only make your interfaces known to the business partners involved and either do not make any details about your own system landscape available, or only specific details.
For example, you can define RosettaNet Partner Interface Processes (PIPs) as business services.
Thanks
Swarup

Office 2013 Home and Business OEM First Run screen

Hi There
We are starting to roll out office 2013 oem Home and Business our users are reporting that the first run screen get coming up every time there open an office application.
In Group Policy I've disable the First Run Movie and Office First run on application boot however the users are still getting to first run screen this is every annoying.
Any help with would be great?
Cheers,
Brett

The policy setting should work: it correctly adds bootedrtm=1 value to HKCU\Software\Policies\Microsoft\office\15.0\firstrun. But for some reason Office apps ignore it. I tried disabling the entire policy, then go through the welcome screen. After finishing
with it, office created the same value, but in another place (HKCU\Software\Microsoft\Office\15.0\FirstRun), and the screen never appeared anymore.
So to make the setting work, you have to manually create registry setting (via GPO preference) with the following data:.
[HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Office\15.0\FirstRun]
"BootedRTM"=dword:00000001
P.S. this was pretty easy, but did anyone look at disabling the EULA prompt? The acceptance is marked by creating a registry key for each user, but the path contains computer name :)) Therefore if all users of the PC have accepted the agreement, and you
renamed the computer, the popup comes back again. And of course group policy is impossible with such path.

MS Office 2010 upgrade Home and Student to Home and Business

Hello,
I have to change Office versions on a couple of computers from Home and Student to Home and Business. I intend to uninstall the current versions then install the new ones. Presumably the license keys "liberated" can be reused on other computers. Is that
correct?
As far as I can tell, MS provides no way to recover a key. There are several utilities on the net that claim to do that. How reliable are they?
Thanks in advance
Philippe

Hi,
For a preloaded Office version you can locate the product key on you computer.
If you purchased a Product Key Card, please locate the key on it.
http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/products/find-your-office-2010-product-key-HA101832538.aspx
If you lost the product key, try this:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/823570?wa=wsignin1.0
More information about licenses usage:
Q:Can I install Office Home and Business 2010 and Office Professional 2010 on more than one PC?
A:It depends on what you purchase—a Traditional Disc or Product Key Card. If you purchase a Traditional Disc retail license of Office Home and Business 2010 or Office Professional 2010, the retail license terms allow you to install, activate, and use Office
Home and Business 2010 or Office Professional 2010 on your primary PC and your portable device such as your laptop. This license is for your use exclusively.
If you purchase an Office 2010 Product Key Card, you can only activate and use the suite on one PC or device. For more information on the license you have purchased and to obtain an overview of your licensing agreement, visit the
Microsoft Software License Terms (MSLT)
http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/products/office-2010-frequently-asked-questions-HA101674631.aspx
Best regards,
Rex Zhang
TechNet Community Support
A new Office has arrived, try it now.
A beautiful Start. It begins here. Windows 8 and Windows RT.
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help.

Error while creating Business Agreement from IC web Client

Dear Experts,
I am working on IC Web Client ( CRM 7.0) & ISU (ECC 6).
I was able to create the Business Agreement & sucessfully replicate the same to ISU as a COntract Account.
But when I Try to create the Business Agreement from ICWebClient I am gwtting following Error.
"No Business Agreement Class for Channel ICW, Usage 01 and Risk Class"
I have done the settings for ,Allocate Business Agreement Class as ;
Channel :- ICW ,
Usage :-Std Payment Data,
Risk CLass :- B,
Business Agreement CLass:- 01
But still I am Getting this error.
Can any one please help me in this

Hi,
Try maintaining an entry with blank risk class.
Regards
Prasenjit

Error While Creating Business Agreement via IC Web CLient

Dear Experts,
I am working on IC Web Client ( CRM 7.0) & ISU (ECC 6).
I was able to create the Business Agreement & successfully replicate the same
to ISU as a Contract Account.
But when I Try to create the Business Agreement from ICWebClient I am
getting following Error.
"No Business Agreement Class for Channel ICW, Usage 01 and Risk Class"
I have done the settings for ,Allocate Business Agreement Class as ;
Channel :- ICW ,
Usage :-Std Payment Data,
Risk CLass :- B,
Business Agreement CLass:- 01
But still I am Getting this error.
Can any one please help me in this

Problem solved mainatain Risk Class as " "

CRM orders with error "Do not enter a business agreement for sold-to party"

Dear SDN'ler,
after creating orders in SAP CRM via ISA (CRM 4.0) and uploading them to R/3 all orders are created successfully in R/3 but an error message is sent back to SAP CRM in case of ALL orders.
Error message is the following:
"Do not enter a business agreement for sold-to party xyz"
Message no. CRM_BILLING011
Diagnosis
The field "FI-CA active" is not selected for the sold-to party 6000201 in the business master record. Since the business agreement is used in the component FI-CA, excluding the control of processes, it makes sense to enter a business agreement.
Procedure
Delete the entered business agreement.
==> Could someone please give me some more information about the mentioned "business agreement"? Where do I find field "FI-CA active" (in R/3 or CRM customer master data?)?
==> And how can I eliminate this error message for CRM orders in SAP CRM?
Thanks a lot.
Best Regards,
Rainer Gryschka

Please check the customising setting under following path:
SPRO --> Customer Relationship Management --> Master Data --> Business Partner -- > Business Agreement --> Define Basic Settings
Alternatively you may also check following customisation table using SM30 --> CRMC_BUAG_ACTV

Business Agreement Creation Error

Hi All,
Thanks to you all for giving prompt responses to my questions.
Today we are getting some error while creating a Business Agreement in CRM Web UI.
We are using CRM 2007 and ISU as a back end.
I am using IC agent as a business role and while creating a business agreement, I m getting an error message as "Edit payment conditions in Customizing".
Has anybody faced this type of error message?
Helpful response will be definately awarded.
Cheers,
Raj

Hi Denis,
Thank you for your provided link.
Further question according to this setup guide, the template for contract account for Replication mapping table. I have below questions:
1. What is the contract account no should I put in the table TFK_BUAG_REF?
2. We do not required to replicate the account determination ID (Contract account) to tax determination ID (CRM). Do we still need to maintain table TFK_MAP_KOFIZ_SD?
Appreciate if you can further help on these.
Thanks a lot.
Best Regards,
Catherine

CRM 7.0 / IS-U: adding custom fields to Business agreement for replication

Hello Experts!
We're working on replication of custom fields from IS-U to CRM 7.0.
Can you help me with clarification of my understanding of these questions..?
1) CRM/IS-U mapping tables for buag_main:
Business Agreement(BUAG_MAIN) is a BO in CRM that corresponds to CRM table CRMM_BUAG and to Contract account in IS-U table FKKVKP.
Table FKKVKP were enhanced with some z-fields,
so we are going to enhance corresponding CRM table CRMM_BUAG (or CRMM_BUAG_H) with that new fields..
But we see that these CRM and IS-U tables have far not the same field structures..
So, the question: Which crm and is-u tables i should look, enhance and replicate for Business agreement?
2) Access to Business agreement with possibility to add custom field:
I couldn't find in Web UI where i can directly edit profile of Business Agreement..
I've found just access to assignment block "Business agreement" on Account's profile overview page..(Role ServicePRO; Account details).
There I used AET to add custom field..but I faced with problem when the 1st popup appeared: there was no enhanced object "Business Agreement"..
Also in role "Utilities IC Agent" i've found "business agreement" profile but there I don't see buttons for adding custom fields..
So, the question is: Where I can access Business agreement profile to enhance it with custom fields for replication with IS-U?
3) CRM/IS-U data exchange functions:
I tend to use tcode CRMC_BUT_CALL_FU:
for CRM inbound event of BUAG object - FM CRM_BUAG_MWX_PROCESS_EXT_STRUC..(as template).
Question: Am I right that it fits my requirement to replicate custom fields from IS-U to CRM?
Please tell me if you need more information..
Looking forward to your answers.
Thank you a lot in advance!
Kind regards,
Evgenia

Hi Gobi,
Thank you for advice. But:
I've created fields not by using AET - I used documentation that Nicolas suggested me above.
I've enhanced tables and structures that were mentioned there with my z-fields for both sides (CRM and ERP).
Also I looked CRMC_BUT_CALL_FU for CRM Inbound BUAG_MAIN - corresponding standard FMs are marked for call.
Any ideas?
Thanks in advance.
BR,
Evgenia

Initial Load of BUAG_MAIN (Business Agreements) IS-U = CRM

Hello. We are integrating ISU to SAP CRM 7.0.
We have been replicating Business Partners between the two systems for a couple of years, and now wish to begin replication the Business Agreements <=> Contract acconts objects (BUAG_MAIN)
In our development system, in order to successfully process the initial load of BUAG_MAIN, I had to RE-run an inital load of BUPA_MAIN. I am really unconfortable having to do this in our productive systems!
My question to you experts:
Is there a way to run an initial load of a dependent object (BUAG_MAIN) without having to re-run an initial load of the parent object? Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated!

Hello Pratik,
- There are no dumps in ST22
- There are no errors in SMW01
- No. range settings are set as following:
CRM: Master Data-> Business Agreement-> Define Number Range for Business Agreement:
No.     From number         To number          Ext.
01       000100000000       000199999999     X
02       000200000000       000299999999
ERP/IS-U: Financial Accounting (New)-> Contract Accounts Receivable and Payable-> Basic Functions->Contract Accounts->Number Ranges and Contract Account Categories
No.     From number         To number          Ext.
01       000100000000       000199999999
02       000200000000       000299999999     X
But before inital download we have set all no. ranges to External as prescribed in the set-up and load guide for business agreements and contract accounts.
(There is just one Business Agreement Class and one contract account category)
Hope to hear from you soon.
Kind Regards
Saima

Few questions about OWB migration 10g---- 11g and UIODs

I am curretly migrating OWB repository from 10g to 11g.
Both repositories are on the same database.
We just have one single Project in our Repository. It is actually(preinstalled) MY_PROJECT renamed into something else. So it has the UOID of the "default" MY_PROJECT but of course, physical and business names are different.
Because we renamed MY_PROJECT, complications occured when we first tried to do the repository upgrade the recommended way, with repository assistant. During the upgrade processes , the error came that the objects with same UOIDs but different names exist.
Obviously, MY_PROJECT from the 10g repository collided with the new, preinstalled, MY_PROJECT in the (almost) empty 11g repository/workspace.
Also, MY_PROJECT in 11g workspace has exactly the same UOID as the one created in 10g repository.
I was told by Oracle support that this was a bug-but they do not see it as high priority, so we had to do workaround --the migration of the repository on 11g.
Now my first Question: Was it completely insane to use MY_PROJECT for your actual ongoing Project? We never had any other problem with this constallation.I also noticed in forums that people indeed use MY_PROJECT for their work.
The second question: Has anybody , ever, seen the same problem, when trying to upgrade to 11g ?
The migration procedure is as follows:
-install 11g Workspace with Repository Assistant
-Export locations and data from 10g repository
-Import locations and data in 11g repository- thé update option -matching on UOID..so we do not get problem with MY_PROJECT
-register locations in11g repository
-deploy all mappings and workflows
Now, this all works fine..and our new 11g repository runs without problem..
I am still puzzled by few things :
New 11g repository is almost empty apart from MY_PROJECT and DEFAULT_CONFIGURATION. Now, MY_PROJECT in 11g has the same UOID as in oracle 10. But DAFAULT_CONFIGURATION in 11g has different UOID from DAFAULT_CONFIGURATION in 10g. It is always the same UIOD for every new 11g installation (I've upgraded repository on many databases).
Now 3rd question: Is there any particular reason why DEFAULT_CONFIGURATION has different UOID in 11g and MY_PROJECT hast the same UOID ? Is there any logic behind it -that I fail to grasp ?
Another thing. I said that I am importing complete Project in the new repository with update option with matching on UIOD. I should get a problem with DAFAULT_CONFIGURATION, I thought, since it is in the full export of the Project and DEFAULT_CONFIGURATION has different UOID than in 11g repository.
But I did not get the problem at all.Default Configuration was simply skipped during the import - visible from the import log.
Therefore 4th question : Why didnät OWB try to import DEAFULT_CONFIG? Is it "internal" object and as such cant't be changed ?
The reason I am so obsessed with UOIDs is that we have automated release procedure (between development, test and production repositores) which is based on comparing UOIDs.
Therefore a s slight trace of concearn on my side, because the DEAFULT CONFIG now has different UOIDs than before. But on the other side, we just propagate mappings and workflows between repositories - I do not see why the default config should matter here .
Thank very much in advance for any answers/suggestions/ideas and comments!
Edited by: Reggy on 27.01.2012 07:12
Edited by: Reggy on 27.01.2012 07:12

I am curretly migrating OWB repository from 10g to 11g.
Both repositories are on the same database.
We just have one single Project in our Repository. It is actually(preinstalled) MY_PROJECT renamed into something else. So it has the UOID of the "default" MY_PROJECT but of course, physical and business names are different.
Because we renamed MY_PROJECT, complications occured when we first tried to do the repository upgrade the recommended way, with repository assistant. During the upgrade processes , the error came that the objects with same UOIDs but different names exist.
Obviously, MY_PROJECT from the 10g repository collided with the new, preinstalled, MY_PROJECT in the (almost) empty 11g repository/workspace.
Also, MY_PROJECT in 11g workspace has exactly the same UOID as the one created in 10g repository.
I was told by Oracle support that this was a bug-but they do not see it as high priority, so we had to do workaround --the migration of the repository on 11g.
Now my first Question: Was it completely insane to use MY_PROJECT for your actual ongoing Project? We never had any other problem with this constallation.I also noticed in forums that people indeed use MY_PROJECT for their work.
The second question: Has anybody , ever, seen the same problem, when trying to upgrade to 11g ?
The migration procedure is as follows:
-install 11g Workspace with Repository Assistant
-Export locations and data from 10g repository
-Import locations and data in 11g repository- thé update option -matching on UOID..so we do not get problem with MY_PROJECT
-register locations in11g repository
-deploy all mappings and workflows
Now, this all works fine..and our new 11g repository runs without problem..
I am still puzzled by few things :
New 11g repository is almost empty apart from MY_PROJECT and DEFAULT_CONFIGURATION. Now, MY_PROJECT in 11g has the same UOID as in oracle 10. But DAFAULT_CONFIGURATION in 11g has different UOID from DAFAULT_CONFIGURATION in 10g. It is always the same UIOD for every new 11g installation (I've upgraded repository on many databases).
Now 3rd question: Is there any particular reason why DEFAULT_CONFIGURATION has different UOID in 11g and MY_PROJECT hast the same UOID ? Is there any logic behind it -that I fail to grasp ?
Another thing. I said that I am importing complete Project in the new repository with update option with matching on UIOD. I should get a problem with DAFAULT_CONFIGURATION, I thought, since it is in the full export of the Project and DEFAULT_CONFIGURATION has different UOID than in 11g repository.
But I did not get the problem at all.Default Configuration was simply skipped during the import - visible from the import log.
Therefore 4th question : Why didnät OWB try to import DEAFULT_CONFIG? Is it "internal" object and as such cant't be changed ?
The reason I am so obsessed with UOIDs is that we have automated release procedure (between development, test and production repositores) which is based on comparing UOIDs.
Therefore a s slight trace of concearn on my side, because the DEAFULT CONFIG now has different UOIDs than before. But on the other side, we just propagate mappings and workflows between repositories - I do not see why the default config should matter here .
Thank very much in advance for any answers/suggestions/ideas and comments!
Edited by: Reggy on 27.01.2012 07:12
Edited by: Reggy on 27.01.2012 07:12

Contract account as Business Agreement not updated till baug_main reloaded

Contract Acount is replicated as business agreement only after i re-load the baug_main object. I have to re-load this object each time i create a contract account and want to see in as business agreement in CRM.
Does Anyone know a way around this problem.
I will very grateful for any help or clue.
Regards,
Nasreen

Hi,
Please do the configuration at the below place.
Your problem will be solved.
IMG>Financial Accounting>Contract Account>Integration>Customer Relationship Management>Business Agreement>Determine Template for Contract Account Replication.
Warm regards,
Rahul

Migration of BUPAs and business agreements

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for