Migration question - 64bit to 32bit

Hello All,
I am currently running a 64 bit 11.1.0.7 db on redhat 5.4 OS. I created a 32bit 11.1.0.7 on Redhat 5.4 32 bit, same file structure as
my 64 bit host. I did a cold copy of my .dbf files from the 64 bit to the 32 bit host, db starts all looks fine. However, when I attempt to drop
a user or object (any user) on my newly built 32 bit db/host, the following message appears:
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-00604: error occurred at recursive SQL level 1
ORA-06553: PLS-801: internal error [56319]
Since I went from a 64 bit to 32 bit, is this causing me an issue? The only files that were copied to the 32 bit host from the 64 bit host were the .dbf files,
and they initially came from a 32 bot host a while back. Do I need to do anything possibly in Migrate mode?
Thanks in advance for your help..
RB
Edited by: ronthe11gdba on Dec 11, 2009 4:32 PM
Edited by: ronthe11gdba on Dec 11, 2009 4:36 PM

As noted above, you simply cannot copy a database created by 64bit software and expect it to work with 32bit software. Pl see MOS Doc 62290.1 (Changing between 32-bit and 64-bit Word Sizes)
HTH
Srini

Similar Messages

Change 64bit to 32bit

How do you Change 64bit to 32bit ?
Because i downloaded the file which took ages and now it wont work help ?

Your question isn't clear, but I'll make a guess at what you're asking.
After Effects CS5 is a 64-bit application. It requires a 64-bit operating system and 64-bit processor. There is no 32-bit version of After Effects CS5.
After Effects CS4 is a 32-bit application.
CS5 Production Premium & Master Collection (Windows) include Premiere Pro CS4 & After Effects CS4: http://bit.ly/bS5O8P

Install PhotoCD Plugin under Photoshop CS4 (64bit and 32bit) under Windows 7.

Install PhotoCD Plugin under Photoshop CS4 (64bit and 32bit) under Windows 7.

And that question is supposed to mean what....? Sorry, you need to explain what you are having difficulty with, not just spit out random text fragments.
Mylenium

Analysis Authorization Migration Question

Analysis Authorization Migration Question
This is detail Question
1) I am testing Analysis Authorization Migration in NW2004s SP9 and have applied all OSS notes that are relevant to SP09 and are coming in SP10.
2) We have 2 Info object flagged as Authorization relevant 0COMP_CODE and 0COSTCENTER
3) We have Object level security set-up in BW 3.x system and for a role we have specified values like 0COMP_CODE has value 1000, 1800. :. In the same role we have specified 0COSTCENTER value 130001 to 180001, : and hierarchy node.
4) When we migrate to Analysis Authorizations, using RSEC_MIGRATION, this program creates 2 Authorizations ZCOCODE00 & ZCOSTCTRH00. Both of them have 0COMP_CODE and 0COST_CENTER Objects.
5) ZCOCODE00 authorization gets value 0COMP_CODE values 1000, 1800. : and 0COSTCENTER Value :.
6) On the same line ZCOSTCTRH00 gets value 130001 to 180001, : and 0COMP_CODE :.
1st Question:
1) Why does it create 2 Authorizations?
2) During Checking it does not pass the authorizations, because it seems to me that it fails in Optimization process.
3) I manually merge the authorizations in ONE object then authorization check passes. In other word if I combine ZCOSTCTRH00 & ZCOCODE00 then Query authorization check passes.
Any one is struggling on this.
Please note, I am doing Migration so that it updates existing Profiles (Roles now from SP9).
Any comments will be very help full.
Pankaj Gupta

Hello Pankaj
There are some basic misunderstandings on your side.
Let me try to clarify:
First we should distinguish between migration of authorizations and of what a query does with them.
You had 2 auth objects before migration (in 3.x).
Of course, they must be migrated to 2 new analysis auths.
There is no general possibility to combine authorizations to a single one as the may appear in different roles and users. Moreover this would kill performance and finally, nobody would recognize the origin.
Only in very restricted cases one could think of a combination of auths which come out of migration. But, then people loose overview about what goes on.
Before the corrections in note "Migration IV" the : had not been inserted but now it is for good reasons.
Now, accept for the moment that you receive 2 auths.
Then, you cannnot (must not) combine the 2 resulting authorizations!
Authorization 1
COMP_CODE : 1000, 1300, :
Cost Center : :
Authorizations 2
Comp_Code :
Cost Center : 3100001-31999999; : plus a Hierarchy Node.
This means that e.g. combination
COMP_CODE 1000
COST_CENTER 3100001-31999999
is not allowed!!! Therefore, they must not be combined!
Also, the query and its optimization is comepletely independent of the migration. And here, during query run time the auths cannot be combined. It is no failure!
Moreover, the merging optimization is just a performance optimizaiton and has nothing to do with whether the query result is authorized or not.
If you combine them manually you have authorized different combinations.
Well, now you may wonder why you get 2 auths at all which leads to a "no auth" result in the query execution.
The reason is, that in 3.x where you got a result with your 2 auth objects the modeling was wrong.
If you want to authorize any combination of characteristic values, you should combine these characteritics together in one auth object, not in 2!
(In BI7.0 it works like that but not in 3.x)
But you defined 2 which may be valid even in several other InfoProviders independently and not even at the same time. Moreover, the auth objects may come from different roles and may be assigend to different users which then have completely different auth content. In general it is not possible to combine different auth objects or to find out those special situations which nevertheless allow for such optimizations. If you re-do a migration with more objects and users you could even receive different results which is also not satisfying.
Therefore, instead, the mechanism was introduced to insert a : auth to those characteristics that are auth relevant (and checked now with 7.0) but not in the currently processed auth object.
In you special case it may have made sense to combine them but not in general. And a migration can only try to work as general as possible.
For your application you may combine the 2 auths manually if you want to allow also the crossover combinations
COMP_CODE 1000
COST_CENTER 3100001-31999999
Best regards
Peter John
BI Development

What are the advantages/disadvantages of using PS/CS5 in 64bit over 32bit please?

What are the advantages/disadvantages of using PS/CS5 in 64bit over 32bit please?

From a practical perspective, besides the 64 bit version being a bit faster at just about everything, limitations on document size are lifted in the 64 bit version. Essentially, how much can do is limited only by how much RAM you have installed in your system. You can do things like have larger documents, deeper history, etc. and have it all work quickly.
On the other hand, many 3rd party plug-ins, especially older ones, only provide 32 bit versions, which will only run in 32 bit Photoshop.
Both 32 and 64 bit versions are installed by default. It's important to note that most of the preferences are separate between the two, so you can have two slightly different setups that might help with specialty operations you might need. This gets pretty subtle, but for example I keep the 32 bit version configured with only 1 cache level, so all previews of high bit depth images are always composited in high bit depth. This aids me with some aspects of astroimage processing. It's slower, but more accurate. By contrast I have more cache levels configured for my 64 bit version, so that's faster for general photography work.
-Noel

ODI Studio on Windows 7 64bit or 32bit mode?

Hello,
Anyone know anything about running ODI studio on Windows 7 64bit or 32bit mode? Are there certification for this OS in either mode? What are the certification plans?
Thanks,

Have a read of the certification matrix for 11G :- http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/oracle-data-integrator/oracle_odi_11gr1_(11.1.1.x)_certification_matrix.xls
Cheers
John
http://john-goodwin.blogspot.com/

Installation CS6 64bit and 32bit

When I installed the downloaded Photoshop CS6 software, the application offered to install BOTH 64bit AND 32bit versions.
Never seen that before, usually software looks at system and installs the correct version (or you choose before downloading).
I have Windows 7 64bit system.
Is there a reason to install BOTH? Is there a problem to have both installed?
Thanks,

PS CS 6 on 64 bit machnie offers you both the options 32 bit as well as 64 bit.
Its your choice to install both or any one of it.
64 bit Photoshop can utilize more RAM installed on your machine and will respond better to larger files as compared to 32 bit
On 32 bit OS , there is no choice given because the only option left out is 32 bit photoshop.
If you install both the versions, there will be "NO PROBLEM AT ALL"

Java download 64bit vs 32bit

Hi, I am reading http://java.com/en/download/faq/java_win64bit.xml. I just installed windows 7 64-bit. I checked I have default IE8 (no 64bit edition). I never knew browser will be a factor for java version, so I was thinking of downloading 64-bit JDK, but by reading it, should I really stay 32bit JDK? My final goal is to install weblogic portal. Weblogic portal has 32 bit download for most OS including eclipse already. It only has one generic binary for 64 bit for all OS, so I need to download JDK, eclipse separately. So before I go too far, I need to decide 64bit or 32bit. Thanks!

Your windows 64 bit has also the 64 bit IE. You can use IE 32 or 64 as you please, although by default, the 32 bit browser is launched. I guess the reason is that, for now, there are more plug-ins for it. Your best bet is to install both 32 and 64 bit Java. It works for me fine in the browser and outside. Of course, when you type java in a command prompt, Windows has to know which one to use, so just play with your path.

Exchange 2013 Migration Questions

Exchange 2013 SP1 to a new server. I just realized that I have been asking migration questions on the "general" forum. Here's the deal:
We just want to move to a newer server and reuse the "old" server as a DAG member. We have a production exchange 2013 SP1 server and I found that the DB is not on a RAID'ed drive. So, we purchased a server. I installed 2012 R2 and all windows updates.
Then installed exchange 2013 SP1. Then got our AS/AV software installed. When I boot the new server up and login to ECP, it sees all the exchange users, DB and info. So, I followed:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd876926(v=exchg.150).aspx
to migrate users and current email to the new DB. However, when users logged in their current email was not there. I also tried to use the ECP migration option and this resulted in the same, users old email was not in their inbox. So I had to perform that
same process on the old DB to get users old email back. I then tried to use the migration option in the ECP->same issue. So as of now, we are on the old DB and things are working fine.
According to:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa997006(v=exchg.65).aspx
When moving from server to server, the DB filename must be the same. The non-production server does not have the same DB filename. Could this be the problem? Could someone point me to documentation on migrating from server to server

So I ran Get-Mailbox -Database “Source Database Name” " -ResultSize Unlimited | New-MoveRequest -TargetDatabase “Target Database Name” and moved all the user mailboxes. Then moved the system mailboxes, public folders and
OAB. Adjusted send connector to reflect new server. Log in as a user, all email is there. Great! Dismount the old DB. Wait a few minutes and user email is still there. Woohoo! Shut down the old exchange server and a few minutes later, all email is gone. Boo!
Boot the old server back up and mount the old DB, all email is back in user inbox. How do I use only the new DB in exchange 2013?
So I just dismounted the old DB and all email stays in users inbox?! So it must be something with the old server that did not get moved over but for the life of me I cant figure out what

Any performance/resource utilisation advantage of using 64bit vs 32bit Office 2013 for virtualization?

any performance/resource utilisation advantage of using 64bit vs 32bit Office 2013 for virtualization?
"When you hit a wrong note it's the next note that makes it good or bad". Miles Davis

MS' recomm still is to use the 32 bit version of office unless your users have really large (excel) files that would benefit from x64: http://technet.microsoft.com/library/ee681792(v=office.15).aspx
Falko
Twitter
@kirk_tn   |   Blog
kirxblog   |   Web
kirx.org   |   Fireside
appvbook.com

Should I install both the 64bit and 32bit install of Photoshop CS6

Should I install both the 64bit and 32bit install of Photoshop CS6?

you probably will want to install both: http://forums.adobe.com/message/4635420

Iprint migration question

We had to back out of a migration last week because of issues with edir version on Netware. I've updated that and TSA, but another question just came up. I'm migrating iPrint from a cluster, plus doing transfer ID. If I choose cluster resource on the source server in miggui, I only get the consolidate option. Does that mean I need to first run a consolidation job just for iprint and then go back and run the transfer ID? Or will the consolidation screw up a transfer ID?

$(UService migrations based on cluster resources and Transfer ID are separated in Migration Tools (miggui). You need to execute Cluster based iPrint migration in one project and Transfer ID migration in another project.
Perform all service consolidation migrations and make sure they are all completed/synced and working before attempting Transfer ID.
>>>
From:
zenking<[email protected]>
To:
novell.support.open-enterprise-server.migration
Date:
07/22/2010 02:26 AM
Subject:
iprint migration question
We had to back out of a migration last week because of issues with edir
version on Netware. I've updated that and TSA, but another question just
came up. I'm migrating iPrint from a cluster, plus doing transfer ID.
If I choose cluster resource on the source server in miggui, I only get
the consolidate option. Does that mean I need to first run a
consolidation job just for iprint and then go back and run the transfer
ID? Or will the consolidation screw up a transfer ID?
zenking
zenking's Profile: http://forums.novell.com/member.php?userid=2813
View this thread: http://forums.novell.com/showthread.php?t=416302

64Bit版ODAC と 32Bit版ODAC

以下の環境で動作する64Bitアプリケーション（バッチプログラム）の開発を考えております。
・サーバーOS　・・・　Windows2008R2（64Bit）
・データベース　・・・　Oracle 11g Release 2 Standard Edition x64
・開発ツール　・・・　Microsoft Visual Studio 2010
・開発言語　・・・　VB.NET
・DBアクセスミドル・・・Oracle Data Provider for .NET 4 11.2.0.2.0
ここで、開発するのは64Bitアプリであるため、
開発クライアントのOSもWindow7の64Bit、ODP.NETも64Bitとしたいのですが、
諸事情から、開発クライアントのOSを64Bitにすることが出来ないため
開発はWindow7の32Bit、ODP.NETも32BitのPCで行い、
それとは別に、ビルドするための64Bitマシンを用意しようと考えております。
この方法（32Bit環境で開発したソースをそのまま64Bit環境に持っていってビルドするだけ）で、
64Bitアプリは問題なく動作するでしょうか？
以上、同様の経験をお持ちである方がいらっしゃいましたら、ご指導をお願いします。

WOW64にて運用することは検討されましたでしょうか?
http://www.atmarkit.co.jp/fwin2k/special/win64_02/win64_02_01.html
当方は下記環境ですが、32bitでコンパイルしたアプリケーション(バッチ)をWOW64で実行しています。
・サーバーOS　・・・　Windows2008（64Bit） RAM:8GB
・データベース　・・・　Oracle 11g (11.1.0.7.0) Standard Edition One x64
・開発ツール　・・・　Microsoft Visual Studio 2008
・開発言語　・・・　VB.NET
[理由1] 64bit版の開発環境を準備できなかった。
[理由2] バッチアプリケーションをクライアントPC(32bit版)でも実行する要件があった。
[留意点1] サーバーへはOracle Client(32bit版)をインストールする。
[留意点2] VB.NETからサードパーティ製コンポーネント(Crystal Reportsなど)を呼び出す場合、
いずれも32bit版をインストールする。
[留意点3] VB.NETのコンパイルオプションでTargetCPU:x86 を指定する。(AnyCPUではダメ)
以上、参考になれば幸いです。

Migration SAP-System from 32bit-server to 64bit- server

We want to change our SAP SOLMAN EHP1-system , which running
on LINUX SLES9 32bit ( with MAXDB 7.7 ) to a new target server with LINUX SLES10 64bit ( as well MAXDB 7.7 ).
We have also the same OS Linux but differents releases.
My question: Can I perform this change with the tool "homogene
Systemcopy" or is there any other solution for this problem ??

A Solution Manager is a combined ABAP + Java system. You can do a database copy approach but you must use sapinst to migrate the Java part (it's all included in sapinst).
Keep in mind that your JDK changes, for 32bit Linux you must use the Sun JDK, for x86_64 you must use the IBM JDK. The migration may fail on initial attempt since the parameter for the Sun JDK are different to those for the IBM JDK. You'd then have to adapt the parameters using configtool before you can continue.
Apart from that it should be smooth.
Markus

Migration from linux intel 32bit to linux AMD_Opteron 64bit

Hi,
I'm trying to duplicate an instance from a 10.2.0.2 intel 32 server to an opteron 64bit (10.2.0.3).
Which are the options?
If I take an Rman Backup and I try the Restore I can't open the destination db.
If I issue a startup migrate and then I run the catupgrd.sql script I get the error
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION version_script
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-06544: PL/SQL: internal error, arguments: [56319], [], [], [], [], [], [],
ORA-06553: PLS-801: internal error [56319]
If this depends from the platform migration, maybe the only option is to use export/import?
Thanks.

Hi, the OS is RedHat3 on the source database and RedHat5 on the destination database.
I would have preferred to use the backup/restore but, since I have found several issues on the migration from 32bit to 64bit, I think I will use the export/import path to move data.
Regards,
k

Migration question - 64bit to 32bit

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for