"MIMO Cable link did not lock within alloted time" error in USRP 2922

Hi,
I am running Prof Heath courseware experiments, specifically lab 2.1, on USRP 2922 and I have come through this error:
"niUSRP Initiate.vi<ERR>The MIMO cable link did not lock within the alloted time." with error code "-1074118624". I don't understand the error and don't know what to do noting that I'm not using anything related to MIMO and I don't have a MIMO cable in the first place.
Can someone help me with that? Thanks!
Solved!
Go to Solution.

Here I am attaching screenshots for the top_rx.vi (1.jpg and 2.jpg) showing the hardware parameters and the modulation parameters respectively and a screenshot for the receiver.vi (the subvi, 3.jpg) where the problem occurs.
And yes, I've been able to run other examples: the vi for the first experiment ran smoothly.
Attachments:
1.JPG ‏235 KB
2.JPG ‏263 KB
3.JPG ‏246 KB

Similar Messages

  • Alamouti 2x2 using USRP- PPL did not lock within the allotted time

    Hello.
    I've been trying to use the following example VI:
    http://www.ni.com/white-paper/13878/en/
    I can't understand how to connect the two USRPs 
    What clock source should I use? How should I connect it?
    right now I have my USRPs connected with a MIMO cable, and both are connected to my laptop with a gigabit switch.
    currently, when I'm tring to run the VI without the clock source, there is this error:
    niUSRP initiate.vi<ERR>The reference clock PPL did not lock within the alloted time.
    Thank you in advance.

    Sorry for the late reply, I did not have access to the lab over the weekend. 
    Yes I am uing HW configuration 1.  i set my IPs for the Txs and Rxs (4 NI 2921 boards), set the symbol rate, and appropriate IQ sampling rate. I then set the Tx element 1 Ref Frequency Source and timbase clock to internal. and for element 2 to be MIMO. I do the same for the Rx element 1 and element 2 as mentioned in the white paper. I set an appropriate carrier freq according to my machine (shown in snapshot below)
    I then run the code, and the error shown in the picture shows up. Apparently, the error code is not recognized. I also show a picture of the error recorded on the front panel (which is the actual error, that needs to looked at). I then re-wire the error out in the block diagram to be connected to the last block in the chain 'Calculate BER VI' (shown in the 3rd picture below) which was previously not the case. Now i rerun the VI, and the error showing up in the block diagram is gone but the error mentioned on the front panel is still there (which is normal becuase i have not changed anything important in the block diagram). 
    I look up this error 'Error -107411864 - A stream command was issued in the past' and find this NI-known issues document: http://www.ni.com/product-documentation/52445/en/ 
    And I see this error there. ID number 467209 (corresponding to the above error) . In this it states:
    This error occurs when you set Timebase Clock Source to PpsIn and do not provide a timebase clock source to the PPS IN port.
    If you set Timebase Clock Source to PpsIn and do not provide a timebase clock source to PPS IN, the USRP device will revert back to its internal timebase clock source. This may result in error -1074118649 "A stream command was issued in the past."
    Since I have not even setup the configuration on the front panel using the Ref_in and PPS_in (i have actually set them to internal) why am i still getting this error. 
    I also looked at the ID number '466351' in the same list (right below the prev one) and find out that also seems to be fine since not all of the follwing conditions are being met:
    The slave device has a GPSDO.
    The niUSRP Set Time VI is called only on the master.
    The timestamp is applied immediately.
    as mentioned in the description. 
    And since, there is a clear conflict between the white paper configuration designed for this 2x2 scheme (HW configuration 1) and the actual HW configuration corresponding to this same white paper (HW configuration 2), how can i expect the code to run without the Refi_in and PPS_in for all 4 devices (for sync between Transmitters and Recievers) which seems to important for this code to run properly. 
    I do not understand this error either 'A stream command was issued in the past' since i have not found a soultion to it online. 
    Now can you elaborate on what seems to be a conflict and elaborate on this error, which has been reported on other threads as well but the NI people do not seem to bother to respond as to why this is so.

  • 2.0 - 0x803d0006 - The Operation Did not complete within the time allotted

    I integrated MBAM 2.0 into ConfMgr 2012 SP1 on Srv2008R2 & SQL 2008R2 box. All MBAM components lying on the same server. Network is encrypted, using https, clients and server have certificates from inside PKI.
    - Manual encryption attempt with MBAM client fails ends with "An error has occurred". During this, there is no error codes anywhere.
    - During automatic triggering of MBAM client, 0x803d0006 comes up into event viewer.
    - Laptops are partitioned with extra Bitlocker partition as they should be
    - Laptops are able to communicate with
    MBAMRecoveryAndHardwareService/CoreService.svc
    - Group Policies are applied with necassary MBAM settings. Reporting point is disabled because ConfMgr integration takes care of that.
    - During the error on a client side, I don´t see any logs in event viewer on a server side

    I solved this By creating GPO policies only via MBAM node. Previously I had a mixup with policies, because I had configured Bitlocker Encryption policies also. With MBAM, only MBAM´s own policies should be configured.
    So this error massage is occured only because of GPO conflict. I also noticed, that you can easily mix up things with MBAM´s policies also, if configuring different encryption settings and causing conflict between them (like encryption package, keys etc).
    So if you don´t know, what you are doing (like me, hehe), leave encryption polices as default.
     

  • Error: Device\Ide\iaStor0, did not respond within the timeout period.

    Hello,
    In last few months, I began getting the error:
    The device, \Device\Ide\iaStor0, did not respond within the timeout period.
    My system hangs and slows to a crawl.  Error seems to be well-known, and solution is to install the latest version of Intel Matrix Manager, which is 8.6.   I've done this, I reinstalled my OS, and I've reinitialized my hard Raid1 array.  None of this has helped.
    http://www.intel.com/support/chipsets/imsm/sb/cs-025783.htm
    Any suggestions?
    Thx.
    Scott

    Quote
    Have you tested HDD's with Seagate diagnostic utility?
    Going by the link you have provided I assume you are using Vista?
    Yes, I am using Vista and I did also use Sea Tools; no issue identified.  I'd love to hear more suggestions.  Things I've done:
    1.  Reformat / reinstall.  Helped, but problem not eliminated.
    2.  Ran SeaTools Disk Diagnostic.  No issue.
    3.  Installed Intel Matrix STorage, most recent version 8.6.  Should've fix prob, but didn't. 
    4.  Upgraded Bios from 7.5 to 7.9.
    Seems like the upgrade to Intel Matrix Storage Manager should've fixed this issue, but it didn't.   Any particular drive identified in the error message in the original post? 
    It is also not clear what changed to have introduced this error.  My system has been stable for 2 years and from the errors looks like I've had problems for the last 3 months, but they got notably worse in the last 2 weeks.  Reformatting / reinstall helped, but didn't eliminate these issues.  Any insight would be appreciated.

  • J2ee connection error, "The Message Server did not respond within 60 sec"

    Hi,
    I am facing the error "The Message Server did not respond within 60 sec. Please check if the message server is running.." when connecting to J2ee through NWDS.
    I am able to reach the index page via http://<ip address>:53500/index.html but yet unable to reach through NWDS.
    I have tried various combinations of host and port names like:
    Message Server Host : <ip address>, <host name>
    Message Server Port : 3636, 3936
    but still no luck.
    I've also cross checked the value of message server port by navigating to http://<IP address>:53500/monitoring/SystemInfo too, it is 3636.
    The telnet test (telnet <ip address> <port Number>) draws a blank window.
    I know this problem has been posted again and again, but then I am unable to understand what is the solution to this.
    Can someone please help me in resolving this issue?
    Note: [link 1|Unable to Connect to the J2EE Server from Netweaver Developer Studio; & [link 2|Developer Studio:Exception:The message server did not respond within 60 sec; are already checked.

    Hi Robin,
    Although I still haven't received any info from my colleagues regarding the central instance..
    Just a quick query, if we have NW04 we use 36** and if it is NW04S then we use 39** , is this the only difference for message server port?
    If that is the case, as I mentioned earlier, I have tried both, and one gave me N/A(3936) while the other gave me 'message server did not respond' error(3636).
    I have the message server host name & port , Enqueue Server Host name & Port and SDM PID and Port details with me..
    Can this be anyway useful in establishing a connection?
    Waiting for your inputs...
    Best Regards,
    Vinay

  • Recently did upgrade from OS 10.6.8 and to Mainstage 2.2.2 and have lost lights on my Gio pedal only in Mainstage - still have them with Logic.  Tried holding button and replugging USB cable, but did not fix it.

    Recently did upgrade from OS 10.6.8 and to Mainstage 2.2.2 and have lost lights on my Gio pedal only in Mainstage - still have them with Logic.  Tried holding button and replugging USB cable, but did not fix it.

    Hi
    Chamie7 wrote:
    Recently did upgrade from OS 10.6.8 and to Mainstage 2.2.2 and have lost lights on my Gio pedal only in Mainstage - still have them with Logic. 
    I presume that you mean that the switches do not light up as appropriate when you select a Patch in MS?
    If so, in Layout Mode, select each of the buttons in turn, and check that they are a) Assigned to the correct MIDI CC number etc, and b) that "Send Value to" has the correct Port selected.
    CCT

  • Developer Studio:Exception:The message server did not respond within 60 sec

    Folks,
    I am getting this error in Developer Studio ( J2EE Engine Preference) , Can anyone please tell me what is the issue.
    Exception: The message server did not respond within 60 sec.Please check if the message server is running and if the socket connection has been established
    Thanks,
    Manish

    If the system information page is showing 3900, you should use 3900 in your studio settings.
    39xx is the new default for 2004s. It was 36xx with 2004. And xx is the instance number.
    Regards,
    Christophe
    Message was edited by:
            Christophe Benoit

  • Process 000004 did not confirm within the permitted time period

    Hi
    The process chain failed while activating the ODS with an error message :Process 000004 did not confirm within the permitted time period" . When repeated the failed step it went successufull. but want to know what can be the cause and steps to be taken in order to avoide this issue further.
    Thanks
    Ratan

    Hi,
    Whenever ODS activation goes there'll be some batch processes you can say as parallel processes running along with main job. Due to unavailability of resources i.e either bkgd or dialog processes soemtimes gets delayed and they gets canceled which leads to the failure of main ODS activation job...
    may be in ur scenario the same thing might have happened, so when you had repeated the step if the resources are free it will be successful.
    once chk in your system for canceled jobs, ther might be some job which relates to your process.
    rgds,

  • Java.sql.SQLException: Io exception: A remote host did not respond within t

    Hi All,
    I am using SUN ONE Webserver 6 on AIX with Oracle 8i. Every now and then I get this error
    java.sql.SQLException: Io exception: A remote host did not respond within the timeout period.
    I am not able to unterstand this. Some one please help...
    Thanks

    Are you able to connect to the database server from the same machine where you are running SJS Web Server using JDBC?
    Are the driver and the Database using compatible drivers?
    Does it normally work? Is the error accompanied by other symptoms like application failure or unusually slow responses?

  • Exception:The messege server did not respond within 60 sec.

    When I am deploying my application it is aborted and displaying the Error as
    'Deployment exception : Cannot determine sdm host (is empty). Please configure your engine/sdm correctly !'
    In Preferences >> SAP J2EE Engine I have specified a messege server host and its port.
    When I go to the Perspective J2EE Engine there I can see an error i.e.
    'Exception:The messege server did not respond within 60 sec.Please check if the messege server is running and if the socket connection is established'
    How to resolve this?

    Hi,
    I think the connection data is somehow not right.
    What is your message server host and port  being configured?
    I think the default message server port is 3601
    Regards,
    Vincent

  • Exception: The message server did not respond within 60 sec.

    Folks,
    I am getting this error in Developer Studio ( J2EE Engine Preference) , Can anyone please tell me what is the issue.
    <i><b>Exception: The message server did not respond within 60 sec.Please check if the message server is running and if the socket connection has been established</b></i>
    Thanks,
    Manish

    Hi,
    I think the connection data is somehow not right.
    What is your message server host and port  being configured?
    I think the default message server port is 3601
    Regards,
    Vincent

  • A remote server did not respond within timeout period

    HI
    I have a opened in servlet which is not closed.My servlet uses it for various checks.When a request comes after long time, my servlet tries to make a database call and that time I am getting following error.
    java.sql.SQLException:IO Exception A remote host did not respond within the timeout period.
    Please guide.
    Thanks in advance.

    I am using the same connection again.
    The db server is up and running and the query fetches hardly any data.
    when i stop and restart the servlet, everything becomes normal.

  • This item could not be crawled because the repository did not respond within the specified timeout period. Try to crawl the repository at a later time, or increase the timeout value on the Proxy and Timeout page in search administration. You might also wa

    HI,
    I got the error message in the crawl log as below after performing the Full Crawl
    This item could not be crawled because the repository did not respond within the specified timeout period. Try to crawl the repository at a later time, or increase
    the timeout value on the Proxy and Timeout page in search administration. You might also want to crawl this repository during off-peak usage times.
    To overcome the above error,many forums have suggested me to increase the time out which is under Farm level settings.But if time out gets increased,performance impacts as well.
    So please suggest me to overcome this error without increasing the timeout.Thanks in advance
    Regards,
    Sudheer
    Thanks & Regards, Sudheer

    Hi,
    I understand that you get the error message when performing a full crawl. I have seen similar cases caused by IE proxy settings. You can try to edit the Internet Options>Connections>LAN settings. Uncheck ‘Automatically detect settings’.
    For more information, please refer to this site:
    Search error: crawler could not connect to the repository:
    http://social.technet.microsoft.com/forums/en-US/sharepointadminprevious/thread/c230ab36-8d0b-4c25-bf86-33136d17642b/
    Thanks,
    Entan Ming
    Entan Ming
    TechNet Community Support

  • Who is able to reset a registraton after pc-crash, German operations did not answer within 2 months.

    who is able to reset a registraton after pc-crash, German operations did not answer within 2 months.

    Only activation support can do that, but you should be able to start a chat session right now if you go here:
    http://www.adobe.com/products/activation/

  • The embedded controller (EC) did not respond within the specified timeout period - Flex 15D

    Hello,
    I have an IdeaPad Flex 15D, and I have had several problems (mostly processor-related) in the time I have been using it. I contacted Customer Support twice, and finally did a system reset a few days ago after being told by Lenovo Support that my choices for fixing the problem were 1) Reset, or 2) Pay for a premium service to diagnose the problem. Needless to say (again), I went with option 1. So far I have not had any noticible problems with the processors, but there is a certain error showing up in the Event Viewer that I am concerned about. Lenovo Support has been next-to-useless troubleshooting my problems thus far, so I'm taking them here. The error is as follows:
    (Event ID 13)
    The embedded controller (EC) did not respond within the specified timeout period. This may indicate that there is an error in the EC hardware or firmware or that the BIOS is accessing the EC incorrectly. You should check with your computer manufacturer for an upgraded BIOS. In some situations, this error may cause the computer to function incorrectly.
    Sounds like the BIOS needs an update, right? Well, I went straight to the Flex 15D drivers page, and guess what? I quote the drivers page: Bios update is not required for this product. Not required? So, Lenovo ships a broken BIOS and then refuses to support it? I don't know if Lenovo employees ever read this forum, so this might not be the best way to get their attention, but I am so fed up with Customer Support and I want this issue to be known to more than just a few unhelpful 'tech support' people. The Flex 15D isn't one of the more popular laptops out there, so I can't expect anyone reading this to be able to duplicate this problem or really provide any support, but if you have any suggestions whatsover, please reply to this thread. Like I said, I want people to know, and hopefully we can get Lenovo's attention so they can fix this problem.
    Best regards,
    Owen Dugmore

    Hi,
    I understand that you get the error message when performing a full crawl. I have seen similar cases caused by IE proxy settings. You can try to edit the Internet Options>Connections>LAN settings. Uncheck ‘Automatically detect settings’.
    For more information, please refer to this site:
    Search error: crawler could not connect to the repository:
    http://social.technet.microsoft.com/forums/en-US/sharepointadminprevious/thread/c230ab36-8d0b-4c25-bf86-33136d17642b/
    Thanks,
    Entan Ming
    Entan Ming
    TechNet Community Support

Maybe you are looking for