Minimum screen resolution for safari 3 (mac)

Hi i recently updated to 10.4.11 and noticed that safari does not work corretly any more if you use screen resolutions below ??? X 768.
In my case my girlfriend is very shortsite, nearly blind, and she used 1024x640 on our 24" iMac. Now after we updated to 10.4.11 safari only display "garbage" in this screen resolution.
so she currently uses firefox... is there any way to make safari work again?

i have an update on this problem. i tried to recreate this symptom on my macbook pro 1.8 GHZ with 10.5.1. i was able to run safari using 1024x640. so i thought it is worth a try doing some housekeeping on my iMac, i used ONYX to clean the system and after this checked the HDD and permissions using the installation DVD. No change. So i reinstalled combo update for 10.4.11 and still the same behaviour. Any help is highly welcome.

Similar Messages

Minimum Screen Resolution for Premiere Pro CS3

I want to be able to run the package on my laptop when out and about, but the
screen resolution is only 1024 x 768. Can anyone tell me whether it will run under said resolution, but with a crowded screen or will it simply not work. I have not yet bought the product yet, and this could be a deciding factor.
Thanks in advance for any help.
Maurice

That's what I am running and it has been awesome over the last two days with the only exception being a "Desktop Display Mode has been reset because the video card returned an error." I thought I had this problem licked until I got it again this afternoon and now it won't go away.
- Matt

Minimum screen resolution for firfox for android ?

I know ARM6 builds are not very well tested and supported. But knowing minimum color depth and resolution will help buying me a Android phone :) I am planning to buy a low cost Android for myself :)

Firefox is currently designed for phones with WVGA (800*480) or higher resolution.
We plan to improve the Firefox UI for lower-resolution phones, in a future version.

After the last up date for Safari (Mac OS X 10.8.5 in a iMac mid 2011 21.5 inch 2.8GHz Intel Core i7) The window don't open or they are there and only in an outline, kind of like they're behind the screen. I have also done a system update and then a syst

After the last up date for Safari (Mac OS X 10.8.5 in a iMac mid 2011 21.5 inch 2.8GHz Intel Core i7)
The window don't open or they are there and only in an outline, kind of like they're behind the screen.
I have also done a system update and then a system reinstall.
What now? incident nr, 526941222.

After the last up date for Safari (Mac OS X 10.8.5 in a iMac mid 2011 21.5 inch 2.8GHz Intel Core i7)
The window don't open or they are there and only in an outline, kind of like they're behind the screen.
I have also done a system update and then a system reinstall.
What now? incident nr, 526941222.

NetBook Screen Resolution for Media Manager

I have an LG x120 Netbook. As a net book, the screen is small, so the max screen resolution is something like 1024 x 566. This si below the minimum screen resolution required for even opening up the Media Manager.
Needless to say, THIS SUCKS, how do I get round this stupid requirement?
Jonathan O'Halloran
www.quantumdx.com

Hi and Welcome to the Forums!
Sorry, but basically, you don't...as you stated, the software has a minimum screen resolution requirement. Simple as that. If your system does not meet that, then the software won't work. You can read this KB for more information, including a workaround.
Good luck!
Occam's Razor nearly always applies when troubleshooting technology issues!
If anyone has been helpful to you, please show your appreciation by clicking the button inside of their post. Please click here and read, along with the threads to which it links, for helpful information to guide you as you proceed. I always recommend that you treat your BlackBerry like any other computing device, including using a regular backup schedule...click here for an article with instructions.
Join our BBM Channels
BSCF General Channel
PIN: C0001B7B4 Display/Scan Bar Code
Knowledge Base Updates
PIN: C0005A9AA Display/Scan Bar Code

Screen resolution for Fusion Applications?

We are in process to set screen resolution standard for our ADF applications. We are much interested to know about supported screen resolution in fusion applications. Can any body let us know what is minimum required resolution for fusion applications? And what is recommended resolution?

It is 1280*1024 as per
Standard Screen Resolution for Fusion Apps

FCS 3: minimum screen resolution requirement

I have just upgraded from FCS2 to FCS3. I am still using 2 CRT monitors which I will be replacing later this summer. However, because my current monitors are set to 1024x768 85 Hz resolution, the first time I tried to start up the new FCS3 application it said that my monitors did not meet the minimum screen resolution of 1280x800...and that software results/performance could not be guaranteed.
Would it be relatively safe to forge ahead and ignore the cautionary notice? I will be doing primarily some editing in HD in Pro Res 1080 p...and did a trial run on this on my older version of FCS2 and with the older CRTs and the same 1024x768 resolution and it all seemed to work fine.
I do not plan on using Color...at least not for quite some time.
Once I get my newer LCD displays, I will be at the higher resolution levels...but can I make a go of it for now?
Thanks for any advice...John

Worse comes to worse you can export to XML and edit in Final Cut 6/FS2. Also If FCS2 does what you need, you could just continue on with that until you get the new monitors unless there is something in FCS3.
If this is stuff you must have working perfectly without a doubt because of deadlines, well you could play it safe and stick with FS2. If you are just working with it now to learn the new package, no real downside.

What is "native resolution" for my mac mini G4?

I'm going to buy a 22" Samsung monitor with 1920 x 1080 resolution specs for the mac mini, PPC G4 model. I realize the resolution can be adjusted on the computer, and I need the refresh rate lower than the specified 154mhz limit for "cohesive" monitors. That aside, I remember a term "native resolution for the Mac" and I'm thinking this is, for comparison sake, where the mac should display to make text on a word processing document look 1:1 life size. Also, it will make 1" of graphics appear on 1" of the screen. Am I correct?
I'm wondering because when I run the Samsung monitor at 1920 x 1080, will I end up with tiny, scaled-down graphics and text? And, if so, will there be an ideal resolution to adjust the monitor to?
Hope I'm not too clueless on this.... I haven't used a large monitor in some time and don't remember where my 19" CRT used to be set!
Thanks much for help!

cocteau3,
You may be confusing native with default. The G3 desktop would default to 640 by 480 if you zapped the PRAM. You then went into monitors and sound to increase the resolution to what ever the monitor would support and the onboard video port would support.
Before the days of multi-sync monitors, the resolution was fixed for each monitor. Until the Mac II, you had a fixed resolution monitor built in. With the introduction of the NUBUS card, you could buy a card with support for a larger display that was also a fixed resolution.
The Mac IIcx had no onboard video. You bought a NUBUS card for what ever monitor size you wanted. The card and monitor usually came together. With the Mac IIci, in an almost identical case, you had an onboard video port plus the option to add up to three nubus video cards. Native for that onboard video port was now based on the maximum number of pixels that could be supported at thousands of colors or millions of colors. If you wanted millions of colors, you had to add more VRAM or reduce the matrix from 1024 by 748 to 640 by 480. Some games had to be at 256 colors because that is how they were programmed. If you wanted 1024 by 768, you had to settle for thousands of colors, or less color depth than millions. It was simply math. How much math could the computer video port handle?
At our store, in 1999, we had a Quadra 950 set up with five displays. The onboard video would only support 640 by 480 if you wanted millions of colors. That was the native size. Increase the image area (or monitor size) and you decreased the image size. By having four NUBUS cards installed, you could have five monitors connected at once. It was very easy to demonstrate that a 20" monitor could display 640 by 480 and have large text - viewable by the visually impared. A second 20" monitor was set for 1152 by 870 and the text was tiny. Also displayed was a 17" multi-sync that could change resolution.
With the advent of muti-resolution monitors, the idea of 'native resolution' has been replaced by 'supported resolutions.' A monitor may have a default setting but if it is multi-sync, there is no such thing as native. Just factory default. Set any size and frequency you like, so long as that frequency is supported.
This is the best historical link I found:
http://www.proaxis.com/~ferris/docs/dpi-monitor.html
Note that 72dpi was convertable to typesetting because of that long forgotten concept of desktop publishing.
Finally, you can have a large display set at 1600 x 1200 to display many windows and have one window zoomed in to show text at 200%. So many variables that native is not as useful as twenty years ago.
Ji~m

What is the optimum screen resolution for Macbook Pro 15 inch?

Hi, can anyone please provide advice on the optimum screen resolution for a 15 inch MacBook Pro?

Natively you'll get a resolution of 1440 x 900 or you can pay for an upgrade to 1680 x 1050(current models).

24"iMAC optimal screen resolution for photo processing

I have a 24" iMAC (matte) and do mostly photo editing. What is the optimal screen resolution for photo processing work?
thanks
a/d/

All Screens are 72 dpi (dots per inch- in reference to pixels) no matter what screen resolution you use. The only difference the screen resolution will make is the size of the photo when you are viewing. Higher resolution means the picture will take up less space in you work area, but you will most likely have to zoom in to edit finer areas. Lower resolution will cause the picture you are editing to take up more of your work space and to see multiple photos side by side you will have to zoom out of fron the photos. So, really the choice is up to you.
When creating the original document, this is where you need to monitor the dpi. The higher the dpi, the clearer your photo will look in print. A high dpi also means more disk space is being taken up by the photo. Generally a good dpi for print is 300 dpi. Anything that is only purposed for a screen based project (i.e. internet logos) should be saved at 72 dpi. Why use disk space and cause your pages to take longer load if no one will be able to tell the difference on screen between 72 and 300 dpi?
Hope this helps!

Resizing Screen Resolution for Specific Apps?

Hello team,
Is it possible to resize screen resolution for specific applications? Most of my apps look fine at 1024x768, but there are a couple of older OS 9 apps that I need to run (talking school computers here) which are a bit on the small side when viewed at that resolution. Can I somehow set things so that when those applications are launched, the resolution changes to 800x600, and then reverts to 1024x768 when they're quit again? Any and all details about this will be most appreciated, and I thank you in advance for your help!
Electronically yours,
Erik D. Dahlin
School-based Technology Specialist

LCD panels must be used at their native resolution. Whatever it is for you monitor is what you must set it to.
Bob

Screen Resolution for CS4 apps?

I'm finding my 22" screen distorts my files. What are some tips for the best screen resolution for the following:
PhotoShop
Illustrator
InDesign
Dreamweaver
This is Windows XP Pro.
Thanks for your help.

LCD panels must be used at their native resolution. Whatever it is for you monitor is what you must set it to.
Bob

Here is how to enable full screen mode for AIR Mac Desktop Apps

I just discovered that with a very simple native extension method, I can enable full screen mode for AIR Mac Desktop Applications.
This gets you the full screen icon in the top right, and it works perfectly with no changes to my code. (Obviously only works on Lion and above, since this is a Lion feature)
Enjoy.
Here's the code:
    FREObject _EnableFullScreenMode(FREContext ctx, void* functionData, uint32_t argc, FREObject argv[])
        //We should be okay to do this, even on 10.6, according to this post:
        //http://www.cocoabuilder.com/archive/cocoa/311124-implementing-full-screen-for-10-7-but-app-should-also-run-on-10-6.html
        //We can't use [NSApp mainWindow] - didn't appear to work
        //This seems to though:
        NSArray * allWindows = [NSApp windows];
        if (allWindows.count > 0)
            NSWindow *mainWindow = [allWindows objectAtIndex: 0];
            NSWindowCollectionBehavior behavior = [mainWindow collectionBehavior];
            behavior |= NSWindowCollectionBehaviorFullScreenPrimary;
            [mainWindow setCollectionBehavior:behavior];
        //TODO: Return a boolean instead depending on if we found the main window
        return NULL;

Press Control + Command + F on your keyboard to enter or exit full screen mode.

How we will maintain screen resolution for tmaintaining able control in BDC

how we will maintain screen resolution for tmaintaining able control in BDC. can you give the code or how we have to set it

Hi,
You need to use the CTU_PARAM options with the call transaction method.This is used if you would like to do a commit work once call trnasaction is done. This has also got very important property, for example if your Screen resolution is different from others then the screen (Application) will be different that is you'll be having say 5 lines in your screen where as your friend will be having 8 or 10 so your program might fail in this case. If you set variable DEFSIZE as 'X' it will always use the default screen size and hence avoids error.
Use CALL TRANSACTION 'XXX' OPTIONS FROM w_ctu_params.( type CTU_PARAMS)
This structure contains the follwing.
DISMODE : Display mode (like the MODE addition)
UPDMODE: Update mode (like the UPDATE addition)
CATTMODE: CATT mode (controls a CATT)
CATT mode can have the following values:
' ' No CATT active
'N' CATT without single-screen control
'A' CATT with single-screen control
DEFSIZE : Use default window size (Here we are handling those transaction by giving default window size)
RACOMMIT: Do not end transaction at COMMIT WORK
NOBINPT : No batch input mode (that is, SY-BINPT = SPACE)
NOBIEND : No batch input mode after the end of BDC data.
The components DEFSIZE , RACOMMIT, NOBINPT, and NOBIEND always take the following values:
'X' Yes
This might help u in better understanding...
Re: regarding bdc
Re: ctu_params
Regards
Sudheer

11gr1 - Handling different screen resolutions for an enterprise app.

Hi,
We are developing an enterprise application that will be deployed at different clients with different hardware.
We are confused about how to handle different screen resolutions and wonder how others are handling this.
We have some fixed size areas in our screens and liquid areas for content that may expand. The problem is say that you have a table with 6 columns. This table will be rendered nicely at 1280X800 but not at 1650X1050 or 800X600.
At higher resolutions we will either end up having some blank space or expand one of the columns of the table , but can't expand every column proportionally and this will look ugly.
For lower resolutions same problem in a different way will come into picture, we will not able to resize the columns and end up with scroll bars etc ...
What is the best practice with handling different screen resolutions for components like table,panel splitter etc ?
Thanks

Hi Muhammed,
I don't think that any better solution exists, you already use liquid layouts and define widths & heights with percentages etc. In my opinion using blank column at the end of table columns makes table's looking better. Additionally creating custom skin for table and defining column heights & widths with % or em may help you to stretch columns?

Minimum screen resolution for safari 3 (mac)

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for