Minimum Trusted RFC's for productive system

Hi!
We have very strict requirements dealing with set up of Trusted RFC for productive system for ChaRM approach in SOLMAN.
Can some one tell me which Trusted RFC's and users for the productive system do I need?
a) Trusted RFC is not mandatory for the productive system
b) Trusted RFC only in productive system, client: 000, users: 1 communication user and 1Dialog user
c) Trusted RFC in productive system for each client with users...
Thank you very much!
H. Thomasson

Create the function modules in SE37 and set the remote-enabled flag in the attributes section. Then import them into XI.
Create a custom Z table through SE11 on each system to store any data, and the code in each function module would reference it. (Either that or just hard-code everything)
In short yes it can be done through SE37, no you don't need SE38.
I think you're talking about function groups which is a container for the function module. You can do everything through SE37 if you use the Goto->Function Groups-> Create Group option and give it the same name as your Function Module.

Similar Messages

Support message and change requests only for production system

Hi guys,
I would like to connect the solman helpesk with CHARM ( CHARM is still running ).
In CHARM I have to create a CR only for production system. ( don't know why - but works as designed).
In SAP helpdesk I can create support messages for every kind of system type but if I want to connect both (HD and CR) , the source system (ibase component) of the issue will copied to the CR and runs in error because of the rule (only p-system) of CHARM.
Of course I can change the ibase to production system manually in SDCR but it seems a very error-prone method.
Now my question: is it possible to change the ibase component due to the creation of CR by copy rule or something like this?
Kind regards
Rayko

Hi Rayko,
We do not have this option.
Once in ChaRM, we assume that the changes will always correct an issue in the PROD system.
I would recommend to open the tickets directly with the PROD system IBase, once the issue is also happening there.
Best Regards,
Fernando

Restrict print out of Purchase order only for Production system

Hi,
I want to restrict print out of Purchase order only for Production system, don't want to take it in devep or quality.
is there any identifier to find the system is production or development.
can anyone tell me how to restrict it,
is there any function module, not based on client system.
Thanx in advance
Kesav

Hi Kesavarathinam Vaidyalingam ,
yes, I also use thomas' suggestion using
t000-cccategory = 'P'.
to determine productive client.
Just one small hint: I found this condition as true in a test system: The admin had done a system copy to create a fresh test client - but forgot (or did not see a good reason) to change t000-cccategory = 'P. to t000-cccategory = 'T'.
Regards,
Clemens

Content Server config for production system - oac0

Hi all
We are setting up content server for our ERP 2005 system, and I am wondering what best practice is for our scenario.
We have one content server (CST) for development and test systems on host A, and one content server (CSP) for production system on host B. The Archive link configuration in dev and test points to CST. When this is transported to production, it will point to the wrong content server and I will have to reconfigure the archivelink in production to point to the correct content server (CSP).
What is the best way to set up the production system to point to the content server CSP on host B? Should I define a new content repository in t-code oac0 in dev, and transport this to production? Should I define the new repository directly in production system??
Please advise.
Best Regards,
Thomas

Hello,
I had the same problem a few years ago with R/3 4.7.
I don't think there is a perfect solution but here is what I did :
In the DEV system, in OAC0, I created 2 content repositories, one for the test sytem and one for the production. I transported these 2 content repositories in the production system.
In the DEV system, in OAC3, I created temporary links from my business objects to my production content repository. I released the request order.
Then I deleted these links which are wrong in the DEV system. I transported the order in the R/3 production system where these links are right.
In the DEV system, in OAC3, I then created the links from my business objects to my TEST content repository. I released the second request order.
So my config is now OK in my test and my production system.
When we refresh the DEV system by a database copy from the production system. We just have to reimport the test request order to switch the links to be OK on the DEV system. We don't have to recreate the test content repository as it was defined als oi nthe production system.
I am not sure that this is clear but this works for us with no problems since 2002.
I hope this helps.
Olivier

Project Management Question - timelines for Production system deployment

Hi
I need an expert advice on setting up timelines for establishing an Oracle Apps Production environment. We are implementing Oracle HR & Payroll at an organization.
Our system architecture is a 2-node application tier and 2-node DB tier (RAC). RAC is configured by another party and we only have to prepare the application tier (2 nodes)
We would be installing Oracle Apps R11i (11.5.10) with jserv load balancing on the 2-nodes
Can anyone suggest how much time this should take to install/configure & patching of the application tier (on 2 nodes)?
Regards
Saira

Duplicate post (check your other thread):
Project Management Question - timelines for Production system deployment
Re: Project Management Question - timelines for Production system deployment

Steps to configure BPM report from Solman 7.00 for productive system ECC6.0

Hi all,
Please given me the steps to configure Buisness process Monitoring reports from Solman 7.0 for productive system( ECC6.0, windows & database oracle 10.2),
I wanted to create the Reports of monitoring the buisness.
Regards,
Akash Basis consultant.

Thanks for replying Volker von Gloeden,
This thread is my first one in SDN & I am very glad that someone has given the answer ,
I will take a look for solution you have provided & will inform you.
Thanks again.

Creating RFC Destination For UNICODE system From NON-UNICODE system

hi
how can i create RFC Destination For UNICODE system( XI ) From NON-UNICODE (R/3) system.
thanks and regards
Mithlesh Kumar Jha

Hi,
Check these blogs , Hope u would be getting some idea
<b>/people/thomas.jung3/blog/2004/06/24/bsp-150-a-developer146s-journal-part-v-xml-for-rfcs
/people/thomas.jung3/blog/2004/11/15/bsp-150-a-developer146s-journal-part-xiii-developing-abap-webservices
/people/sap.user72/blog/2004/06/19/how-i-started-with-sap-web-development</b>
Regards,
Sridhar Reddy

MaxDB support for production systems

Hi,
I have a DMS with MaxDB version 7.6.00.18.
I opened OSS message regarding an issue. I got a solution, however I was told that '7.6.00.18 is very outdated and no longer supported for productive systems'.
I can install the latest patch but how do I know when MaxDB version is no longer supported for productive system.
Can someone refer me to a note/article?
Thanks,
Omri

here is the details i found
Especially make sure to check in the Product Availability Matrix (PAM) http://service.sap.com/pam that the MaxDB / SAP DB version you plan to use is released for your specific SAP product!
Note 1178367 - SAP MaxDB: End of Support Dates
Cheers,
-Sunil

Log frequence for productive system

Hello!
We use SAP DB (version 7.7) and use auto log function.
We configured the redo log frequence so, that every 10 minutes a new redolog will be written to hardware drive.
Question:
How does this setting (log frequence of 10 minutes) affect the performance of the SAP system?
And which setting (every 10, 20, 30 minutes) should be set for productive system?
kind regards

> My question is about the log settings. Untill today the redo logs were written to the drive, when the max. size of redo log (appr. 1 GB) has been reached.
> Now I changed this settng, so I have every 10 minutes a new redolog file on the hardware drive.
So again my question: Why did you change that? What was the reason to do so?
> The questions:
> Does this frequence (10 minutes) affect the performance of the server (network, SAP system, DB)?
The default max time between database savepoints is 600 seconds - so 10 minutes.
> What is the recommended setting to redolog setting for productive systems?
There is no recommended setting for that, it all depends on what you are trying do. If you want e. g. a shadow database running "after" the production database for 10 minutes, then you use that 10 minutes setup. If you want an hour you configure an hour etc.
It's all based on your setup and what you want to do.
Markus

RFC User for satellite systems

Hello Gurus,
I just wanted to ask about one issue. We are a SAP partner and using Solution Manager in VARs scenario. There are many systems of our customers connected to our Solution Manager..
Now I want to ask about RFC user(s). As I see, in our Solution Manager there are many users(communications type C) with Synthax SOLMAN<system id> or something like that. It means basically, that we have for every particular customerS system one SOLMAN user for RFC(cust_scout) in our Solution Manager. My question is if we can replace all of these users with only one RFC user for all the systems and customers?
Many thanks in advance for your help
Miloslav Pudil
IDS Scheer
Prague
Czech Republic

>
Miloslav Pudil wrote:
> I just wanted to ask about one issue. We are a SAP partner and using Solution Manager in VARs scenario. There are many systems of our customers connected to our Solution Manager..
> Now I want to ask about RFC user(s). As I see, in our Solution Manager there are many users(communications type C) with Synthax SOLMAN<system id> or something like that. It means basically, that we have for every particular customerS system one SOLMAN user for RFC(cust_scout) in our Solution Manager. My question is if we can replace all of these users with only one RFC user for all the systems and customers?
Hi Miloslav,
Technically, it will work that you define one common RFC user in your SolMan for communication (RFC BACK destination) from all connected managed systems.
BUT, I would never recommend it.
Once a managed system cause issues in your SolMan, you are not able (or at least it's much more difficult) to identify the managed system. Same happens, if a invalid password in the BACK destination leads to a locked user.
My recommendation: Spend the extra effort in creating a user per managed system. Operation will be much easier later.
See also this guide:
[Activating EarlyWatch Alert [EWA] in End Customeru2019s System |http://service.sap.com/~form/sapnet?_SHORTKEY=00200797470000089947&_OBJECT=011000358700000567342009E]
Best regards,
Ruediger

Trusted RFC: "jumping to PRD system from DEV via SOLMAN"

Hallo!
I have the following question regarding the Trusted RFC generally in SOLMAN area and better especially within ChaRM.
We have SOLMAN and 3 satellite systems DEV, QAS and PRD.
When we generate Trusted RFC connections from SOLMAN to these satellite systems, we become scared about the following scenario:
A user accesses to DEV system and goes via Trusted RFC to SOLMAN.
From SOLMAN he chooses the Trusted RFC to PRD system and goes into PRD system.
The question:
How can this identification gap/problem be solved?
Thank you very much indeed!
H. Thomasson

Hi Thomasson,
You can restrict the access of your solman system from your DEV system.
Disable the trusted relationship in the RFC that points to Solman from Dev system.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Kiran.

Trusted RFC: "jumping to PRD system from DEV"

Hallo!
I have the following question regarding the Trusted RFC generally in SOLMAN area and better especially within ChaRM.
We have SOLMAN and 3 satellite systems DEV, QAS and PRD.
When we generate Trusted RFC connections from SOLMAN to these satellite systems, we become scared about the following scenario:
A user accesses to DEV system and goes via Trusted RFC to SOLMAN.
From SOLMAN he chooses the Trusted RFC to PRD system and goes into PRD system.
The question:
How can this identification gap/problem be solved?
Thank you very much indeed!
H. Thomasson

Holger,
First of all the user that tries to launch the TRUSTED RFC needs to have an active user in the satellite system he/she tries to reach.
Secondly, this user needs to have the authorization object S_RFCACL assigned to its user.
You can manually change this TRUSTED RFC to 'Logon Screen' if you like.
Roel

Logical System Change for Production System

Hi experts
We have new CRM and BI project. Logical System name of our ERP production system is not in naming standart. So we want to change logical system name and run BDLS in production system.
Is there any risk about this prosedure?
Best Regards...

Hi,
It is not advisable to change the logical system in production client once its assigned.
Regards,
Nisit

RFC destination for Sender System in R/3 4.6c

Hi All,
I am trying create a RFC destination in R/3 4.6 system which will be used as sender RFC communication channel in Xi scenario. However i dont seem to have all the options such as activation type,gateway host and service which used to be there in SAP Enterprise or mySAP ERP systems. Can some one guide me to create an RFC destination in 4.6 system that will be used as a sender RFC system?

Hi Arul,
One more important point u have missed.
Program ID,
When ur configuring sender service from RFC,The most important point is Program ID.
Use some name and create it.Use the same name in SM59.
s such its very crucial .Activate them .make sure the destination for that programID is what u expect.
Reghards
chandra shekar

Backup and Recovery procedures for production system

I am trying to decide and test a best backup/recovery approach for our DBXML database in the production environment. Right now I am trying to go through the documentation.
http://www.oracle.com/technology/documentation/berkeley-db/db/gsg_txn/CXX/filemanagement.html
What is the best option among offline, hot and incremental backups?
I am thinking of implementing incremental backups.
What are the constraints in implementing incremental backups? Is there a detailed step by step example to do this?
Can I test the backup and recovery procedures by copying the db files and log files from Linux (production) environment to my local machine (Windows XP)? I see only one log.00000000xx file in production and staging environments. It is of same size 52428800 in all our environments (both production and staging) at this point of time.
What is __db.001 file? What is the significance of this file in backup and recovery procedures?
A detailed input with example is greatly appreciated.
Thanks in advancs

Raghu,
A couple of points, up front:
1. the __db* files are the environment (cache, locks, various shared memory regions), and are not part of backup, other than the fact that you need to checkpoint or otherwise flush your cache to your database(s) for a full backup.
2. log files are not architecture-neutral. That is you can't use a log file created on linux and just use it safely on another hardware platform. It's OK to copy them around, but they can only be used on the same architecture that created them. Database files (containers) are entirely portable among hardware and operating system platforms.
I don't know of a step-by-step cookbook for backups. This is because of the variations among application needs. However, the procedures described on this page are pretty straightforward:
http://www.oracle.com/technology/documentation/berkeley-db/db/gsg_txn/CXX/backuprestore.html
I'm not sure what you mean by "constraints" on incremental backups. The only constraint is that you need to have a full backup first, or you won't be able to recover properly. Based on what I said above, the other constraint is that you'll only be able to recover on a machine of the same architecture as the one that created the log files.
As for testing, you can certainly copy your database and log files to your Windows machine, treating Windows as an offline backup. If you want to test recovery, you need to copy the files back to Linux. You'll start seeing additional log files when your log data starts to exceed the configured log file size.
Let me know if you need more clarification,
Regards,
George

Minimum Trusted RFC's for productive system

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for