MIRO Equivalent of MIGO exit_saplie01_007 (FG XQSM Inc ZXQSMU06)
In MIGO, there is an exit (exit_saplie01_007) that lets you pop custom screens, etc. after the user hits POST and before the MIGO update task is called. IOW, this exit fires "within" the dialog process of MIGO, not the update task.
Does any one know "right-off" if there is an equivalent exit for MIRO?
Hello David
In thread
how to activate or deactivate a user-exit based a specific condition
I have described a general strategy for implementing CMOD/SMOD exits. In your case, I would create a function group <b>ZXQSM</b> having two function modules:
- <b>Z_EXIT_SAPLIE01_007</b> (= copy of EXIT_SAPLIE01_007) => calls the following fm
- <b>Z_EXIT_SAPLIE01_007_SPEC</b> (-> specific exit that is executed only if certain conditions are fulfilled
All you implementations for you editable ALV grid belong into your customer function group ZXQSM.
Regards
Uwe
Similar Messages
-
In the MIGO update task, you can do custom stuff using the exit "exit_saplmbmb_001" (FG XMBC, Include ZXMBCO01) or the BAdI "MB_DOCUMENT_BADI".
Does anyone know "right-off" the MIRO equivalent of this exit and/or the MIRO equivalent of this BAdI?Hi,
Please find below the BADI's for MIRO Transaction,
BAdI MRM_HEADER_DEFAULT to prepopulate various header fields
BAdI MRM_PAYMENT_TERMS to set terms of payment
BAdI MRM_UDC_DISTRIBUTE to distribute unplanned delivery costs. You can distribute unplanned delivery costs according to your own rules, for example, under...
BAdI MRM_TRANSACT_DEFAULT to prepopulate various transaction fields
BAdI MRM_WT_SPLIT_UPDATE to change the withholding tax data and the data during a vendor split
BAdI MRM_TOLERANCE_GROUP to set vendor-specific tolerance groups
Other BAdIs:
BAdI MRM_RELEASE_CHECK for additional checks before invoices are released, in other words, you can restrict the list of invoices to be released by defining your own criteria.
BAdI MRM_MRIS_HDAT_MODIFY to change document header data in invoicing plans
BAdI MRM_MRKO_HDAT_MODIFY to change document header data in consignment settlement
Thanks,
Krishna -
Internal Order - carryforward MIRO Invoice against MIGO receipt
Hi,
I have created an internal order (TCode KO04 & KO21 )
Allocated full budget for year 2007
Then I have linked it to an asset.
A Purchase Order is made with link to the asset.
A Goods receipt (MIGO) entry also was created against the PO
All these transactions are done in F.year 2007
At this point, the year-end procedure has completed.
For the internal order, when I try to do KOCO , zero amount is shown in the carryforward
because the actuals are posted by GRN.
When I do KOCF, there is no commitments to be carried forward to 2008.
Now I want to post the MIRO invoice agaist the above PO in period 01 of fyear 2008.
The system gives error - " The internal Order has no budget in 2008"
Since the GRN was done in 2007, I thought the Invoice should go through.
Now why the system is checking for budget in 2008 and giving the error ?
Help from anyone would be appreciated.Hi William,
You did the following steps:
A Purchase Order is made with link to the asset. not the internal order???
A Goods receipt (MIGO) entry also was created against the PO
All these transactions are done in F.year 2007
I think the proces is now completed
The PO create the commitment (the budget is used)
The MIRO place the commitment on 0 an post actual values. (the budget is still used)
Result
No values for carryforward Budget and commitments
Now I want to post the MIRO invoice agaist the above PO in period 01 of fyear 2008
Is this second time that you make the same posting???
There is no budget you used it already in 2007 and you get the error The internal Order has no budget in 2008
I think when I follow your process the system is working perferc and make it impossible to go over budget with your second invoice -
ADC for Domestic Purchase not flowing in MIRO for particular MIGO Document
Hello Experts,
We've a scenario in which we pay ADC to domestic vendor. The procedure we follow is as below:
1. Condition record for JAOP with 0% rate maintained in FV12.
2. PO created with JMOP 10%, 2% ECS, 1% SECS & 4% VAT.
3. During MIGO (also excise invoice capture), AED value is maintained
4. After J1IEX, at the time of MIRO this ADC along with other duties flows in simulation
Now in my case, there are number of GR documents for which MIRO is performed, but for particular GR, ADC is not flowing in MIRO and also excise duty is incorrect, it's not flowing from GR.
So what is the probable solution for this, I've already checked MIGO & excise invoice documents & found to be ok.
Thanks in advance
AmitHi,
Have you maintained material price including AED price??
If yes then check whether you have maintained JAX1-100% or not?
I think this should be treated as a dealer purchase as you are maintaining 0% amount for JAOP.
Regards,
Piyush -
Custom Miro Popup in MIGO.
At the time of preparing 105 MIGO of local purchase. We get field of Custom MIRO in local purchases. In previous same transaction we did not get such field of custom MIRO.How this popup of custom MIRO comes?
Edited by: Pritesh kumar on Aug 17, 2010 4:17 PMHI,
Go to XK02 in vendor change, after that in purchase view, check there....
in Schema grp that vendor has the import schema grp or not ?
if yes...then change to local schema grp..
Hope Help U !
Regards,
Pardeep malik -
After Excise MIRO transec,in MIGO Basic custm & Add.custm not captured
HI GURUS,
In the import process after doing Excise MIRO transection,i am doing MIGO but in this onely Basic coustom duty(JCV1) & Add.coustom duty(JADC) etc are not geting captured by default,But Ecess (JECV) & HCess (J1CV) values are captured by default from the system. So we need your help which is highly appreciated.
Best Regards
V.rajHi
last check
open PO in ME23N select your condition and click on details and check following point is there or not
Condition class A Discount or surcharge
statical
Calculat.type A Percentage
accrual
Condit.category B Delivery costs
Manual tick
Cond.control C Changed manually
Condit.origin A Automatic pricing
let em know it look like exact there
Regards
Kailas Ugale
Edited by: kailasugale on Dec 8, 2011 4:03 PM
Edited by: kailasugale on Dec 8, 2011 4:04 PM -
Hi Friends,
My client requirement is like this:
During Return Delivery (MIGO - M.type:122), system should post Vendor Debit (MIRO) postings also. They don't want to do it in two steps.
Any user exist available in MIGO to activate MIRO postings.
I couldn't convince my client. Please throw some light.
Regards,
KarthiThank you for your reply.
I got a hint from SAP library which may address my requirement. (Manual LIV & Automatic Debit during return delivery)
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2005/helpdata/en/4c/92aa38ac576d1be10000009b38f8cf/frameset.htm
But the problem is, I couldn't found the field "Auto. debit" in vendor master.
Can you help me in this.
Karthi -
MIRO - Error of 2 MIRO for 1 MIGO
Dear Friends,
At the time of the creation of a MIRO document, the amount and the quantity are automatically populated on entering the PO number. Once the MIRO is done the entry is posted debiting the GR/IR account and crediting the vendor.
If I once again go to MIRO and give the PO reference, a line appears but without the amount and the quantity. Here the user is able to enter some amount and some quantity and is able to once again save the entry. Is there any way of avoiding this double entry in MIRO stage. Can we set any error message telling that since there is no MIGO, MIRO cannot be done.
regards
VenkateshHi,
Pls check the vendor master data, payment transactions account view (T_code XK02).In this view, there is check box as check double invoice where in u can set for avoiding double entry in MIRO.
May it help to u.
Best regards,
Goraksh Dhikale. -
Dear Gurus,
I have a specific requirement pertaining to MIRO. Normally we do MIGO & then come to MIRO & do invoice postings.
My requirement is when MIGO is done system has to automatically create MIRO & keep it in hold position. Is it possible in SAP to create MIRO automatically based on MIGO creation.
Please guide me this regard.Hi,
go for ERS follow the steps:-
in vendor master tcode xk02
mark the check box AUTO EVAL. AND SUBSEQUENT SETTLEMENT.
mark the check box GR BASED IV
tcode me11
check NO ERS should not be marked in purchasing data 1 screen
tcode me21n
unmark the invoice reciept check box and mark the gr based ive check box
go to tcode MRRL
and execute
and for more details check this link.
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/20c57f75-d26f-2910-c3aa-dee124530121
Reward points if helpful,
Regards,
Archit -
Dear Gurus,
while creating PO,we are giving tax code and it will calculate tax amount.This will show separate line item in MIRO but i want to calculate this tax amount added to landed cost of a material.
is it possible to do that??
thx in adv.........Dear Zafar,
I have changed VST to non deductable in OBCN.then i add 5% to VST in FTXP.while creating PO i gave 1 qty for 1000rs and gave tax code V1.but the tax amount not showing in NET RATE.
can u tel me how to do that??
thx in adv.................. -
BAPI for posting equivalent of MIGO GR (101) for OUTBOUND DELIVERY (R05)
Hi everyone
I am looking for a BAPI or function module to do the above; it is the second leg of an STO posting between plants, the first leg being where the goods issue is posted against the outbound delivery into in-transit stock (IM movement 641), with the second being to GR this stock with a 101, which will take it out of in-transit and into unrestricted stock at the destination plant.
I have tried BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE from every angle but have come to the conclusion it does not cater for this. I also tried to do the GR against the STO (P/O) from which the delivery was created, but this does not work as the follow-on documents for the delivery will not be updated.
Any suggestions?
Thanks
Andrewhi,
i try to doing posting goods issue for outbound delivery out fo the regular progression.
the posting is automaticly as part of outside program.
thanks alot, -
Will MIRO exits generally fire in MR8M also?
In this thread here:
MIRO equivalent of MIGO exit_saplmbmb_001 (or MB_DOCUMENT_BADI)
Krishna Reddygari was kind enough to provide a list of exits and BAdIs related to MIRO.
My question now is:
is it usualy the case that if an exit fires in MIRO, it will also fire in MR8M?
The reason I'm asking is as follows.
Regardless of whether the customer uses MIRO or MR8M, I have to update two custom fields in EKPO line items.
So I'm hoping that the exit or BAdI that I choose for MIRO will also fire in MR8M.No prob with the points.
If you end up using it, have in mind two things which are not so visible in the documentation:
Note that you must not send any system messages in the methods. One exception to this is the method CHANGE_AT_SAVE. In this method, you can issue a system messages if the exception ERROR_WITH_MESSAGE is triggered simultaneously.
Note: only for non-exit commands: you can check the command type in the SAPLMR1M GUI statuses - DELE for preliminar document deletion is one example - or else you get a dump
The statement Commit Work must not be performed, since this leads to data inconsistencies in the database.
Good luck.
Regards -
MIRO(Invoice Verification) posting date is lesser than MIGO(Goods Receipt)
MIRO(Invoice Verification) posting date is lesser than MIGO(Goods Receipt) posting date.
Explanation:
Miro sholud be posted after the GRN has posted. It means that the Posting date of Miro should be greater than or equal to the Posting date of Migo. But I am facing the issue that I can able to post the Miro before the Migo date..
For example: I have posted the Migo(Goods receipt) document with the posting date u2013 10.8.09 and at the same time I can also able to post the Miro(Invoice Verification) posting date as u2013 5.08.09. This is should not be allowed . Kindly give me the solution. Is there any options in SAP standards to restrict this type of Postings(without using user exit).
regards
VaradharajHi
you need to use BADi for this INVOICE_UPDATE
you can give logic as whil;e MIRO system will compare posting date with MIGO doc , then create a Z error msg in se91 nad assign it in that badi
take help of ABAPer, check following link
[LINK |GR date lesser than the PO date, the system should show an error message.; -
HI All,
Can you please tell me in third party sales can we do MIRO with out MIGO, if so please tell the process, and wat are all positives and negatives that we will have if we do the same.
Thanks in Advance..
RamkiHi,
Everything is just a matter of controlling how you want, via Schedule Line Category in SD.
SPRO> Sales and Distribution>Sales>Schedule Lines>Define Schedule Line Categories
First findout which schedule line category you are using (or system is calling, from one of the related Sales Orders already you created and are concerned about now)
For that schedule line category in the above configuration, just make changes accordingly in the field values for Item category and account assignment category.
In Item category, for example, enter 9 - Service and Account Assignment category say C- Sales Order or M - MTO ...that must be told to you by FI/CO folks.
Once you do this, you are all set. This will create a PReq in MM automatically to procure services from vendor. You will not do GR but, sap does it automatically for you once you post service entry sheet for the PO thus created from PR, when customer confirms about the services renderd by your vendor. You may still tweak it if you don't want to enter services....For this, again you have to follow what I mentioned in the previous posting about account assignment category configuration.
Regards -
Can I do MIRO before a MIGO. How do we justify it.
If I do MIRO before MIGO what will be its implications.
If I do MIRO in March 2006 and its MIGO in April 2006; is it possible? if not then how to solve the problem if it has been done.
Regards
VSHi ,
Its possible to do MIRO ahead of MIGO. This is the case especially when you are doing procurement with Forign trade , and your imports have to be custom cleared before you receive the goods.In such case , we do the MIRO , issue payment for the delivery costs (Transport and customs duty etc) , clear the goods from customs. Then do the MIGO , and , MIRO for the payment/ Clearing the payments for the GOODS received.
How ever , to be able to do this you will have to carefully check the options in the PO in the Invoice tab : You should not select the option " GR based Invoice verification". This check box is detrimental on how you can process the invoce.
Do few simulations using these controls and you can understand them better.
Except this explicit setting in which we intend to do the invoice verification before MIGO , in other cases system will not allow you to post the invoice,you can at the best park / hold the invoice.
Hope this information helps.
Regards
raghuramam.
Maybe you are looking for
-
How can I Create a exe file were a tab control on it work`s
I have a VI with many controls and indicators,these are spread on a tab control.This tab control works with out any problems but if i create a exe file then the tab control is fixed. How can I create a exe file so that the tab control on it work´s ?"
-
Using toUpperCase variable in an If Statement
Hi all, I am monitoring a user's input in my command-line program, and by converting their input to upper case, I can easily check whether they've input the correct string. However when I use the String in an If statement, it doesn't like it. Here's
-
Will the Apple Digital AV adapter work for the DISH Remote Access app?
I have a Sling adapter hooked up to my 722K DISH receiver, and the DISH Remote Access app installed on an iPad 2. Great app, btw. What I'd like to know is if I'll be able to use this AV adapter to watch my recorded shows on a TV. Hotel room situation
-
Intel KMS... Finaly useful
After the 2.6.31 kernel and xf86-video-intel 2.9 kms performance is finaly on par with performace of xf86-video-intel 2.7 with EXA on GEM kernel. And also the system is much more stable, no more hardlocks, it's intel's finaly done something 'bout tho
-
Errors occured when compile the bpel process
Errors occurred when compile the bpel process using bpel designer for Eclipse: (com.oracle.bpel.designer_0.9.13) using PM: bpel_jboss_101200 More error infomation following: Buildfile: E:\OraBpelDEclipse3.2\workspace\AboutTest\build.xml main: [bpelc]