MIRO, field "Assignement".

Hi,
how can I set in MIRO the field "Assignement" so that will be hidden?
Best regards

Hi,
Path: SPRO - IMG - SAP NETWEAVER - GENERAL SEETINGS - Field Display Characteristics - Configure Application Transaction Fields
1. Enter T.Code: MIRO
Create Transaction and Screen Variants
Select the Assignement as required.
or
Go to T.Code SHD0
With regards,
B.Ravindranath

Similar Messages

Message No F5808 Field Assign. is a required field for G/L Account.

Hi Guys,
I have a problem when releasing a cancel credit memo billing document.
It shows the following error message:
Field Assign. is a required field for G/L Account.
Message No. F5808
Diagnosis,
The value field "Assign." in the interface to Financial Accounting is an initial value but you are required to make an entry in the field selection for G/L Account XXXX in company code XXXX linked to the field selection for posting key "50".
System Response
Error
Procedure
It might be an error in the configuration of the G/L account field selection. The initial application, used to call up the interface must otherwise define a value for field "Assign.". If this is the case, contact the consultant responsible for the application.

Hi,
The Assignment Number BSEG-ZUONR (I suppose "Assign." means it here.) field status for posting key and GL is optional and mandatory.
I think the GL Account SORT KEY in FS00 is the assignment selection for Billing to FI doc. Say if the SORT KEY is Posting Date, the assignment from Billing to FI Doc would be the date of posting.
But if the SORT KEY is blank ( This is case for my G/L account), the system will select the assignment written in Billing document header (VBRK-ZUONR).
I checked other billing documents, which are not in the same billing type as the one with error, and found it follow the above logic.
So how come this time it shows the above error? Really confused.
Emma
Edited by: qun yang on Sep 22, 2011 9:12 AM

ICR field assignment process 003 debits/credits indicator

Hello experts,
I'm currently implementing ICR processes 001 - 003 for a client. For process 002, I defined a special field assignment using the SL-funtionality. For process 003 no field assignment has to be configured, nevertheless I'm missing the values for field DRCRK which I thought would get them from SHKZG. DRCRK is part of the field catalog for process 003. Can anyone help me on that?
Regards,
Maria Noack

Hello Maria,
Please check with the customer and make sure that they really want to use process 001 as well as 003. Usually they will want to have GL open items as well as subledger open items in the same process so the documents from both sources can be reconciled against each other.
Regarding your question: During data selection the amounts are converted according to their debit/credit indicator before they are transferred to the reconciliation system. Therefore the debit/credit indicator is not transferred to the reconciliation system.
Example:
In the original system you have a document with the following values:
DOCNR: 1234
SHKZG: H
WRBTR: 1.000,00
During data transfer this is converted as follows:
DOCNR: 1234
DRCRK: [SPACE]
TSL: -1.000,00
If DRCRK contained 'H' you could not be sure what amount you are acutally dealing with here...
Some customers added SHKZG to their line items table to have this information available as well.
Hope this explains the implementation of the standard logic.
Ralph

FB01: "Posting with ref." slould I modify the field 'Assignment' by hand?

Hi All,
I'd like to post a document by t.code FB01 and using the function "post with reference".
When i save the new document, it takes the field 'Assignment' from the reference-document i've put in.
Should I modify it by hand before saving it?
Or ther's the way to obtain it in the right way automatically?
Thanks
Gandalf

Hi,
You need to change the required fields manually, before actually posting a document with a reference document.
More over, its better to simulate a document before saving(posting).
Regards,
Praisty

Concatenating data for field assignment in Dynamic Action

In a dynamic action I am creating a record in a custom infotype. In one of the custom infotype fields I need to assign a value of the number 28 concatenated with the personnel number. The line in the dynamic action is
W P9007-Z_INS_EE_PK = '28'&Pernr but the problem is I cannot get a concatenation to work. How do you go about concatenating data together in a field assignment?

Hi David,
For this, you will have to write a small routine in a program and then call it in the dynamic action. Consult your technical team on this. Get them to write a routine which would concatenate the value and pass it to field RP50D-FIELD1. You would then call the routine and default the fields as shown below:
F ZPROGRAM(Z_CONCATENATE)
I INS,9007,,,
W P9007-Z_INS_EE_PK=RP50D-FIELD1
Here, ZPROGRAM is the name of the program and Z_CONCATENATE is the routine which would contain the logic to populate field RP50D-FIELD1 with concatenated value.
Donnie

PA Value Field Assignment

Hello,
Can you please what PA Value Field Assignment is and how it is configured?
Thank you very much.

Hi Salman,
Please refer notes: 52849 - INFO: Transfer of conditions with +/- signs
Hope this helps

Value field assigned to value category

HI ALL,
WHILE DOING GR I AM GETTING ERROR "Value field assigned to value category".
PLEASE HELP
THANKS IN ADVANCE
SRIDHAR

HI ALL
Message no. ZK001
THANKS,
SRIDHAR

MIRO: Field Status control per GL master for non-goods receipt invoices

When posting incoming invoices in FI using FB60, the combination of GL account and CO account assignment are validated and checked against Field Status Group (FSTAG). Such controls are also in place in MM for purchase requisition (ME51N) and purchase order (ME21N), in addition to checking the account assignment category.
But there is problem in posting non-goods receipt (2-way match) invoices in MIRO u2013 system checks GL account and account assignment object according to account assignment category in PO, but not the field status based on GL account. GL account and acct assignment object are proposed by purchase order. However they can be overwritten by users with no validation, often resulting in incorrect posting. Wonder how other manage this issues in their companies.
I would like and need help in implementing a validation or user exit in MIRO which will check GL account against its CO account assignment for cost centre, order or WBS, based on the field status group of the GL master.
Q1, Where is the user-exit or validation maintained that checks the field status group in FB60 and ME21N (not in OB28 or GGB0)?
Q2. If purchase requisition and purchase order check field status group based on GL account, how can we make such controls available in MIRO?
Q3. What is the transaction code for developing a validation for MIRO? (MM MIRO not appeared in the application area of GGB0.)
Appreciated any help

Hi
Th evalidation should be at the source is the Purchase Order. I beleive it is standard SAP Config to put the validation there. So once the PO has been created with the correct account assignments the GR and IR will be correct.

T-Code MIRO with assigned screen variants

Dear Experts,
We are using a BDC recording to call MIRO and send it to an agent via workflow using a z-table.
The customer wants the baseline date on this recording grey'ed out and the business area field required.
The baseline date is on the "PAYMENT" tab of MIRO and Business Area on the "DETAILS" tab.
I assigned three screen variants to a transaction variant and activated it. When I post via MIRO outside the BDC recording, everything works perfect.
However, with the BDC a SAP standard transaction with assigned screen variants doesnu2019t work?
How can I do it via BDC?
Transnet Freight Rail

Hi Suresh,
FI user tell me, when she entry the incoming ivoice by T-Code MIRO,
she typed $1882 (TWD) amount in "Basic datea Tab", and typed Item amount $1882(TWD) (System Default Where User Entry Delivery Note),
but when she clicked clisimulate button,
the system procedure FI Document as below :
Debit : Accrued Accounts Payable : $1883 (TWD) <-- GR/IR Account
Credit : AP - Vendor 1 : $1882 (TWD)
Credit : Price difference-direct material $1 (TWD)
I have already checked that invoice data. The invoice amount is $1882(TWD),
but when user post fi document, the GR/IR Account Amount is $1883(TWD),
How did I know the GR/IR Account $1883(TWD) is how to produce?
Best regards,

Line Item Field "Assignment" not populating

I am posting a KR doc. The assignment field in the line item is not populating with the date on the document is being posted in either of the line items, posting key 31 posting to Vendor and posting key 40 posting to an expense G/L account. The assignment field remains empty. I have checked some documents in the other company codes where this field is being populated with the date in the yyyymmdd.
Please let me know what controls this and how can I make this field populate.

Th Sory key for the GL for that company code should have the document date as the sort key.... check in FS00

Error in MIRO Field Cost Ctr required Message No F5808

Hi SAP Gurus,
Kindly help and advise me on what needs to be done. I encountered an error while doing miro for asset. Error is as follows:
Field Cost Ctr is a required field for G/L account 1200 161200
Message no. F5808
Diagnosis
The value for field "Cost Ctr" in the interface to Financial Accounting is an initial value but you are required to make an entry in the field selection for G/L account "161200" in company code "1200" linked to the field selection for posting key "70".
Please advise on any setup required to correct the error above. I will give full points to those who will help.
Thank you very much in advance...
Thanks and regards,
Jodette

The FSG of the gl accounts does not really require a cost center. However, the asset master data already have a cost center attached to it.
I can not do a depreciation run as well as MIRO.
Please help and advise what needs to be done.
Thanks in advance
Regards,
Jodette

Value Fields assignment. urgent!!!!!

< MODERATOR: Message locked. Please read the [Rules of Engagement|https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/wiki?path=/display/home/rulesofEngagement] before posting next time. >
hi gurus,
we use costing based COPA. i have created a new value field and assign it to a SD condition. but when billing, there is error, i check the system and found this value field has been actived but can not displayed in my operating concern. i want to transfer the value field to operating data structure with T-code KEA0. but failed. because it is actived in the column "Copy from". it is in our production system. very urgent. the following is the error message.
Operating concern 6000 does not contain value field VV150
Message no. KE891
Diagnosis
Value field VV150 is not found in operating concern 6000. This value field is nevertheless assigned to condition type ZD69.
System Response
The billing document cannot be posted to Profitability Analysis.
Procedure
Delete the assignment to condition type ZD69 for operating concern 6000. You do this in Customizing for Profitability Analysis underFlows of Actual Values -> Transfer of Billing Documents -> Assign Value Fields.
your valuable point will be assigned.
thanks in advance.
Ivan

You have to declare the l_lotno and l_batno as global variables.
here they are local variables and their scope is withing the block in which they are defined.
Declare them outside the blocks(Performs etc)
Regards,
Ravi

Sap Query custom field assigned to wrong field group (in extract)

Hello,
I want to add an extra field to InfoSet /SAPQUERY/MEBANF at EBAN level. I added a field in a normal way:
I fill it with a constant value. I adapted Sap Query:
In result, I got the value in new column but only for certain rows:
The value is there only for EBAN rows which have EBKN entries related.
I checked the program, and my new field is added to field group %fg07 with some other fields from table EBKN (not EBAN):
Fields from field group %fg07 are inserted to extract only in event get EBKN, so if there is no entries in EBKN, my field will not be inserted into extract:
I tried a lot of things (assigning my field to new field group in InfoSource, adding a field on EBKN level). I can say that every extra field created by me was assigned to field group &fg07.
Am I doing something wrong?
The target is to add new field in the document overview panel in ME2xN transaction. I know that there is user-exit EXIT_SAPLMEQUERY_002 where I can specify a Z* query. But this solution requires a copy of InfoSet and query to Z*. Adding a new field to standard Sap query is the fastest way.
Message was edited by: Rafal Matuszewski
Now I tried to append EBAN table with my Z* field. I regenerated InfoSet and query but the result is still wrong:
insert EBAN-GSFRG into %fg06.
insert EBAN-ZUGBA into %fg06.
insert EBKN-VBELN into %fg07.
insert EBKN-AUFNR into %fg07.
insert EBKN-KOSTL into %fg07.
insert EBAN-ZZDELIV_DATE_MRP into %fg07. <-- here again the Z* field is assigned to field group related to EBKN table

Thanks Sandra

R/3 fields assignment to communication structure.

Hi all,
Is there a one place(easy way) where I can get a complete list of communcation structure infoobjects and to what R/3 source fields are these infoobjects assigned instead of checking in infosource because it takes a lot of time.
please let me know.
thanks,
Sabrina.

Hello Sabrina,
as a rule of thumb the name of the transfer structure normally is the name of the dataSource in the source-system plus two characters, which define the source system.
e.g. DataSoruce 0co_area_attr
Name of transfer structure for system 1 0co_area_attr_AB
Name of transfer structure for system 2 0co_area_attr_CD
The same goes for dataSources defined using RSO2.
The exact mapping between name of datasource and name of transfer structure is in table RSDSTS.

TF20015: The field 'Assigned To' contains the value 'xyz' that is not in the list of supported values.

When creating a new work item, a list of valid users is populated in the 'assigned to' drop down list. When I select one of the listed domain user values, the drop down color changes to yellow and the error 'TF20015...' is shown.
When selecting the user 'Team Foundation Server Service user' instead of one of the domain users, another error is shown. The 'Assigned By' seams to be valid but the 'Changed by' property, which contains my current domain user 'xyz', seams
to be an invalid value.
Error occurs in Team Explorer for VS2008/2010 and Team Web Explorer
Environment: TFS 2010 RC
Does anyone have some tips where to look at?

This is the case by default (see below)
<FIELD name="Assigned To"
refname="System.AssignedTo" type="String"
syncnamechanges="true">
<HELPTEXT>The person currently working on this task</HELPTEXT>
<ALLOWEXISTINGVALUE
/>
<ALLOWEDVALUES expanditems="true"
filteritems="excludegroups">
<LISTITEM
value="[project]\Contributors" />
</ALLOWEDVALUES>
</FIELD>

MIRO, field "Assignement".

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for