MIRO Not Allowing Partial Quantity To Be Invoiced

In MIRO a user can enter 313.00kg or 314.00kg as the invoiced quantity, but not 313.60kg as is on the paper invoice we received. The system gives the error message: "order price quantity cannot be determined automatically."
How can I go about solving this. Thanks - points will be rewarded.

Dear,
Let me know, Any good receipt or service entry sheet created for material because if you have create service entry sheet or good receipt for material so system take reference of good receipt material quantity and if you give manualy quantity for material in miro so system give "quantity mismatch error"
If any other problem please explan me.
If it is useful please revert back.
Regards,
Mahesh Wagh

Similar Messages

  • System not allowing to post parked vendor invoice

    Hi gurus,
    Why system not allowing to post parked vendor invoice when workflow is used for gl document?????
    It is saying not released and no one is allowed to post???
    Thank you

    Hi Mohit,
    Post can be possible to next authorized level. Check settings or else go to FBV3 ,enter document number ,company code and year > Enter > where you can see the workflow tab > Click on that where you came to know how may release levels are assigned.
    In same view > Click on system in menu bar > services for object > Click on workflow icon > where you came to know who is the next approver.
    Regards
    Mani

  • Cannot preview SSRS report in Visual Studio 2012 - assembly does not allow partially trusted callers

    Hi,
    I have an SSRS report that works fine in Visual Studio 2008 BIDS.  This report references a .Net assembly namely:
    System.Web, Version=2.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b03f5f7f11d50a3a
    I use this assembly in some simple Code functions in the report. e.g.
    System.Web.HttpUtility.UrlEncode(inURL).ToString
    I have converted the SSRS project to 2012 and am trying to preview the report.  However, I get an error relating to: "That assembly does not allow partially trusted callers".  If i deploy the rdl to my local SSRS it renders fine, but
    how do I fix Visual Studio to preview the report without error? This is highly annoying.
    My Visual Studio version is:
    Microsoft Visual Studio Professional 2012
    Version 11.0.61030.00 Update 4
    Microsoft .NET Framework
    Version 4.5.51641
    SQL Server Reporting Services  
    Microsoft SQL Server Reporting Services Designers
    Version 11.0.3402.0
    Any help is appreciated on this one.
    Regards,
    MrHH

    Hi MrHappyHead,
    According to your description, you used custom assembly in the report, when you run the report in Visual Studio 2008, the report works fine. When you run the report in Visual Studio 2012, the error message occurred: "That assembly does not allow partially
    trusted callers".  But the report works fine after you deployed it to report manager.
    Only applications that are fully trusted by the runtime code access security system are allowed to access a shared managed code assembly that is not explicitly marked with the System.Security.AllowPartiallyTrustedCallers attribute. A partially trusted assembly
    (one that is registered in SQL Server with the SAFE or EXTERNAL_ACCESS permission set) that attempts to access a strong-name signed assembly without this attribute causes a System.Security.SecurityException to be thrown. To troubleshoot the problem, please
    refer to the following steps:
    Add namespace system.security to AssemblyInfo.cs file
    Add [assembly:allowpartiallytrustedcaller] to the file.
    Set trust level to "Full" in web.config file
    For more information, please refer to the following document:
    http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2869522/en-us
    If you have any more questions, please feel free to ask.
    Thanks,
    Wendy Fu

  • That assembly does not allow partially trusted callers

    Post Author: Guya
    CA Forum: .NET
    Hi there,
    I am trying to view a report by using crystalreportviewer version 10.0.3300.0 on  asp.net 2.0. but I got That assembly does not allow partially trusted callers. Although I don't want to have full trust on the server but when I change trust level of my web site from midle trust to full trust again I got the same issue.
    Any idea how can I get around the issue?
    Thanks in advance

    Hi VK, looks like these threads should resolve your problem:
    Assembly does not allow partially trusted
    callers                        
    "That assembly
    does not allow partially trusted callers."                        
    That assembly does not allow
    partially trusted callers                        
    Assembly does not allow partially
    trusted callers.                        
    WPF Assembly does not allow
    partially trusted callers
    cameron rautmann

  • System is not receiving partial quantity in MIGO.

    Hi Everyone
    During receiving the partial quantity in MIGo,system gives me following error.
    Deficit of PU Ordered quantity 5 BAG : 2000380 1000 1002 GREEN TIP
    Can u please tell me to get rid of this error so that the system could receive the partial quantity against PO in MIGo
    Regards:Vijay

    Hi,
    Check on it:-
    partial gr quantity can be cancelled or reversed
    SAP MIGO Partial Goods Receipt of a PO then after close PO
    pherasath

  • Allow partial quantity billing for billing plans - VOFM - SAP Note 726039

    Hi Gurus,
    I got one task, telling that copy that routine 23 into customized ex: 902 in VOFM. Then change the copying requirement for the corresponding item category in the copying control (Transaction VTFA).
    reruirement is that the customer is paying cash in advance. Goods are partially delivered.
    ex:
    Order 10001206 creates a downpayment request for 10EA.  A delivery is created for 2EA.
    First clearing invoice 70700001 is created with billing quantity A in the copy control: A Order quantity less invoiced quantity. Hence the whole order quantity is considered for billing.
    For the second clearing invoice 70700003 (the first was cancelled) billing quantity B is used in the coy control: B Delivery quantity less invoiced quantity. Hence 2EA are considered as billing quantity. For an item that has zero delivery quantity an invoice with zero billing quantity will be created ( the behavior we see).
    Billing type        : ZBAC
    SalesDoc Type : ZSC
    Item Category  : zsak, zszs, zsao etc.
    They are telling the Solution like this.
    the quantity to be billed is calculated from delivery quantity minus the already billed quantity during the billing of a billing plan date
    Pls help me, I never used VOFM for enchancement.
    As an abaper what we have to do for this task,
    Thanks in advance.
    Kiran.
    Edited by: ACC10583516 on Jun 11, 2010 6:54 AM
    Edited by: ACC10583516 on Jun 15, 2010 6:31 AM

    hei Kumar,
    How you solve this problem?
    i also face this problem.
    Please share the solution. Thanks

  • To not allow billing cancellation when the invoice is cleared

    Hello
    I would like to know if there is any way to avoid the cancellation of an invoice via VF11 when the invoice has been already cleared.
    Thanks in advance.

    You can write a user exit by checking the status of accounting document associated with the billing document.
    Pl give points if you find my answer helpful / points to correct direction / resolves.
    Thanks,
    Ramesh

  • Delivery is invoiced fully so system should not allow to create 2nd invoic

    hi Expert,
    my issue is, once invoice is created for delivery.
    system should not allow user to create
    second invoice for same delivery number.
    where to check the confiurtion to stop such
    behaviour
    waiting for your reply
    thanks
    Alicia

    Hi Alicia
    In the copy control from delivery to invoice - T code VTFL
    you can maintain the copy routines. try maintaining routine
    3-- which is delivery reatled header
    4-- which is delivery related item
    also at item level copy control you may add the check in billign quantites
    this would stop formc reating another invocie
    Hope this helps
    Thanks
    Akasha

  • Partial deliveries not allowed by Sold to party but allowed by ship to

    I am shipping to a customer that allows partial deliveries but the sold to customer does not allow partial deliveries. As a result the sold to customer setting takes preference over the ship to.
    Do you know of any way how the ship to customer setting will take preference over the sold to setting.

    Hi Francois,
    Its a standard SAP code that runs behind that gives preference to Sold to party than Ship to party. As the sold to party is the one who is placing an order........his preference is taken into consideration as it is upto him to accept partial deliveries or not.
    More over i dont see any logic behind the disagreement on partial deliveries between a sold to party and ship to party.
    In any normal business scenario, allowing partial deliveries depends on the business requirement of the sold to party and the kind the products they are dealing with.
    Its only after a mutual consent between the sold to party and ship to party the decision is taken on partial deliveries.
    REWARD POINTS IF HELPFUL
    Regards
    Sai

  • Partial quantity check by the system in third party sales

    Hi
    In third party sales , i created one third party order for 100 quantity and i did MIRO for 89 quantity . Now when iam doing the billing with reference third party order how system will know that i did miro only for partial quantity
    where is the check that system will check the miro quantity and allow that quantity for billing . Where exactlythe link between the sales order and MIRO document

    Hi,
    It's in copy controll VTFA
    got item level >>> Slect item category >>> details >>> put billing quantity as - F (Invoice reciept qty less invoiced quantity)
    Kapil
    Edited by: Kapildev Farakte on Jan 19, 2010 9:31 AM

  • System not allowing to use park workflow only for GL

    Hi Gurus,
    We have created workflow variant and selected release posting and release payment.
    We want to use workflow only for GL document but when we are parking vendor invoice in fv60, system is not allowing to post parked vendor invoice and saying not released.
    We want one user to park and post vendor invoice. Right now we are not able to.
    Please help.
    Thank you

    Hi Mohit,
    Post can be possible to next authorized level. Check settings or else go to FBV3 ,enter document number ,company code and year > Enter > where you can see the workflow tab > Click on that where you came to know how may release levels are assigned.
    In same view > Click on system in menu bar > services for object > Click on workflow icon > where you came to know who is the next approver.
    Regards
    Mani

  • ERROR: policy does not allow granting permissions at this level outlook

    Hi All,
    Our users are attempting to send sharing requests to each other via Right Click Calendar | Share | Share Calendar
    Availabilty only works fine but Limited and Full Access fails with the error: policy does not allow granting permissions at this level.
    I can see that the default sharing policy is set for availabilty only so I assume I need to add our internal SMTP addresses to the sharing policy with increased right's.
    But... From our testing in our LAB we found that if the exchange org does not have a connection to the federation setup it works fine straigh out of the box.
    Does this sound right or is my LAB just messing with me?
    Cheers
    Josh

    Hi VK, looks like these threads should resolve your problem:
    Assembly does not allow partially trusted
    callers                        
    "That assembly
    does not allow partially trusted callers."                        
    That assembly does not allow
    partially trusted callers                        
    Assembly does not allow partially
    trusted callers.                        
    WPF Assembly does not allow
    partially trusted callers
    cameron rautmann

  • SecurityException assembly does not alllow partially trusted callers

    I have seen a few posts everywhere about this but am still slightly confused as to how this should work. I am not sure if this is a problem due to the Tangosol library not containing the allow partially trusted callers attribute or something else more fundamental with the policy restrictions on how .NET applications are called over the network.
    My app.config is:
    <?xml version="1.0"?>
    <configuration>
    <configSections>
    <section name="coherence" type="Tangosol.Config.CoherenceConfigHandler, Coherence"/>
    </configSections>
    <coherence>
    <cache-factory-config>\\usfiapp\swap_prd\MBS\PNG\Server\DEV\config\coherence.xml</cache-factory-config>
    <cache-config>\\usfiapp\swap_prd\MBS\PNG\Server\DEV\config\cache-config.client.xml</cache-config>
    <pof-config>\\usfiapp\swap_prd\MBS\PNG\Server\DEV\config\pof-config.xml</pof-config>
    </coherence>
    </configuration>
    and when I run my application from a Network Share I get the error and stack trace as shown:
    {ERROR}[1]02/24 13:30:03 - Exception in the main thread
    System.Configuration.ConfigurationErrorsException: An error occurred creating the configuration section handler for coherence: That assembly does not allow partially trusted callers. (\\usfiapp\swap_prd\MBS\PNG\Server\DEV\bin\CacheLoader\ConsoleService.exe.Config line 5) ---> System.Security.SecurityException: That assembly does not allow partially trusted callers.
    at System.Security.CodeAccessSecurityEngine.ThrowSecurityException(Assembly asm, PermissionSet granted, PermissionSet refused, RuntimeMethodHandle rmh, SecurityAction action, Object demand, IPermission permThatFailed)
    at System.RuntimeTypeHandle.CreateInstance(RuntimeType type, Boolean publicOnly, Boolean noCheck, Boolean& canBeCached, RuntimeMethodHandle& ctor, Boolean& bNeedSecurityCheck)
    at System.RuntimeType.CreateInstanceSlow(Boolean publicOnly, Boolean fillCache)
    at System.RuntimeType.CreateInstanceImpl(Boolean publicOnly, Boolean skipVisibilityChecks, Boolean fillCache)
    at System.Activator.CreateInstance(Type type, Boolean nonPublic)
    at System.Configuration.TypeUtil.CreateInstanceWithReflectionPermission(Type type)
    at System.Configuration.RuntimeConfigurationRecord.RuntimeConfigurationFactory.Init(RuntimeConfigurationRecord configRecord, FactoryRecord factoryRecord)
    at System.Configuration.RuntimeConfigurationRecord.RuntimeConfigurationFactory.InitWithRestrictedPermissions(RuntimeConfigurationRecord configRecord, FactoryRecord factoryRecord)
    at System.Configuration.RuntimeConfigurationRecord.RuntimeConfigurationFactory..ctor(RuntimeConfigurationRecord configRecord, FactoryRecord factoryRecord)
    at System.Configuration.RuntimeConfigurationRecord.CreateSectionFactory(FactoryRecord factoryRecord)
    at System.Configuration.BaseConfigurationRecord.FindAndEnsureFactoryRecord(String configKey, Boolean& isRootDeclaredHere)
    The action that failed was:
    LinkDemand
    The assembly or AppDomain that failed was:
    System.Configuration, Version=2.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=b03f5f7f11d50a3a
    The Zone of the assembly that failed was:
    MyComputer
    The Url of the assembly that failed was:
    file:///C:/WINNT/assembly/GAC_MSIL/System.Configuration/2.0.0.0__b03f5f7f11d50a3a/System.Configuration.dll
    --- End of inner exception stack trace ---
    at System.Configuration.BaseConfigurationRecord.FindAndEnsureFactoryRecord(String configKey, Boolean& isRootDeclaredHere)
    at System.Configuration.BaseConfigurationRecord.GetSectionRecursive(String configKey, Boolean getLkg, Boolean checkPermission, Boolean getRuntimeObject, Boolean requestIsHere, Object& result, Object& resultRuntimeObject)
    at System.Configuration.BaseConfigurationRecord.GetSection(String configKey, Boolean getLkg, Boolean checkPermission)
    at System.Configuration.BaseConfigurationRecord.GetSection(String configKey)
    at System.Configuration.ClientConfigurationSystem.System.Configuration.Internal.IInternalConfigSystem.GetSection(String sectionName)
    at System.Configuration.ConfigurationManager.GetSection(String sectionName)
    at Tangosol.Util.ConfigurationUtils.GetCoherenceConfiguration() in c:\dev\release.net\coherence-net-v3.5\src\Coherence\Util\ConfigurationUtils.cs:line 37
    at Tangosol.Net.CacheFactory.get_Config() in c:\dev\release.net\coherence-net-v3.5\src\Coherence\Net\CacheFactory.cs:line 272
    at Tangosol.Net.CacheFactory.get_ConfigurableCacheFactoryConfig() in c:\dev\release.net\coherence-net-v3.5\src\Coherence\Net\CacheFactory.cs:line 392
    at Tangosol.Net.CacheFactory.get_ConfigurableCacheFactory() in c:\dev\release.net\coherence-net-v3.5\src\Coherence\Net\CacheFactory.cs:line 331
    at Tangosol.Net.CacheFactory.GetCache(String name) in c:\dev\release.net\coherence-net-v3.5\src\Coherence\Net\CacheFactory.cs:line 643
    at Bnpp.Irg.PoolManager.ComponentReportCache..ctor() in L:\src\Applications\PoolManagerReplacement\BNPPOF\BNPPOF\POFCacheFactory.cs:line 379
    at Bnpp.Irg.PoolManager.ComponentReportFactory.GetPOFCache() in L:\src\Applications\PoolManagerReplacement\BNPPOF\BNPPOF\POFCacheFactory.cs:line 563
    at Bnpp.Irg.PoolManager.POFCacheAssembler.AssemblePOFCache(String pofCacheType) in L:\src\Applications\PoolManagerReplacement\BNPPOF\BNPPOF\POFCacheFactory.cs:line 90
    at Bnpp.Irg.PoolManager.Program.DeRegister(CtrlTypes t) in L:\src\Applications\PoolManagerReplacement\Server\CacheLoader\CacheLoaderService\Program.cs:line 127
    at Bnpp.Irg.PoolManager.Program.Main(String[] args) in L:\src\Applications\PoolManagerReplacement\Server\CacheLoader\CacheLoaderService\Program.cs:line 192
    Looking on MSDN and other places some say to rebuild the Ent Lib with the AllowPartiallyTrustedCallers() attribute and others say to grant the unc share folder "FullTrust" through URL evidence. I have tried the latter by going to the .NET configuration and creating a new code group under LocalIntranet _Zone called DEVCode with the share from which I am loading the application and trust set to Full Trust.
    This still did not work and I am not sure what part of the Ent Lib I need to rebuild, so how can I get around this. Can you please help?
    Do I need to restart the server on which I am running the network application from after making such a policy change?
    FYI - I am running the application from a Windows Service if that helps.

    Hi Kunla
    I believe that putting '[assembly:AllowPartiallyTrustedCallers]' in your AssemblyInfo.cs should do the trick.
    Thanks
    /Charlie

  • MIGO-GR Open Quantity in Excise Item is not allowing MIRO

    Hello,
    We are facing problem while posting MIRO.
    There is open quantity in Excise Item Tab. This problem is occured as there was difference of 0.036 in Goods Receipt.
    I haved checked my MIGO-GR it is showing 802.00 KG while in J1IS - Part 2 it is showing 801.964 KG there is open quantity.
    Excise Part-2 entry is not completed and it is not allowing us to post MIRO for the Supplier Invoice against the Purchasr Order.
    You are kindly requested to look in to this and suggest solution, how we can solve this problem.
    Edited by: Vishal_Kadiya on Dec 24, 2011 9:27 AM

    hi
    In J1iex change and post  the balance qty and value for the same invoice and then do MIRO.
    Kiran

  • Not allowing miro against one GRN of grn based invoice PO

    Hello Experts,
    Against one GRN, frieght invoicing have been done, parking against the material had also been done but it was not allowing to post the document so i have deleted that parked invoice document & trying to park again but it is not showing any pending GRN.
    & while cancelling these material document following message is displaying " Document xxxxxxxx   does not contain any selectable items".
    How to park this document.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Anisha

    Hi,
    Thanks for your reply, I have deleted it through the programme Z_MRM_DELETE_PP as that parked document was not accessable.
    After deleting parked invoice, frieght tab from the material document tab is missing although its frieght invoice is posted.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Anisha
    Edited by: Anisha Sinha on Aug 18, 2009 8:27 AM
    not received any specific soln
    Edited by: Anisha Sinha on Oct 20, 2009 8:10 AM

Maybe you are looking for