MIRO requirment

Hi gurus,
Process:
1) Raised service PO
2) Capture service entry sheet based on PO
3) we do MIRO based on service entry sheet
My client have requirment for VAT in MIRO. know when we r posting through MIRO the entries:
Vendor                 2187 Cr
GR/IR                    2000 Dr
services tax       103 (5.15%) Dr
CanteenVat          84 (4%) Dr
But the client want it as:
Vendor                 2103 Cr
Vat payable           84 Cr
GR/IR                    2000 Dr
services tax       103 (5.15%) Dr
Canteen Vat          84 (4%) Dr
is this case possible through MIRO transation

HI Pushkala,
                  As u said to maintain out put tax code. how is it possible to maintain in this case
                   Base amt              2000
                   Service tax            103 (5.15% on base price)
                   VAT                       84 (4% on Base price+Service tax)
For the above case we have to maintain a single tax code.
Regard's
Venky

Similar Messages

  • MIRO - Require Lower Tolerance Level to enforce Payment Block

    Hi,
    I have a requirement to enforce a payment block in MIRO when the tolerence level is below the threshhold set-up in config.
    My original intention was to use Userexit MM08R002 to check the tolerance level, however EXIT_SAPLKONT_002 does not seem to be triggering. It is active and I have placed a hard coded break point.
    Does anyone know how to trigger this exit in MIRO?
    Many Thanks,
    Phil

    I managed to formalize a solution by implementing Enhancement Spots in FM: MRM_AMOUNT_CHECK & MRM_FINAL_CHECK.
    I exported the message table in MRM_AMOUNT_CHECK to memory. I then imported and processed this table in MRM_FINAL_CHECK, triggered when the document is posted. If the message table contained relevant messages i.e.084 then I enforced a manual payment block.
    Hope this helps others with a similar problem.
    Regards,
    Phil

  • MIRO requires PO reference

    Hello Experts,
    I have a SOX requirement to block all MIRO invoices that does not have a reference to Purchase Order.
    Is there a functional customizing solution for this?
    Thanks in advance

    Vishal/Steve B,
    I have checked your suggestions and I already have the following SPRO settings:
    Tolerence key AN is activated and set for 0,1
    Tolerenace key AP is activated and set for 0,1
    Direct Postings to G/L is also activated this is because we also require additional lines posted to G/L. I cannot switch this off.
    Example of problem:
    MIRO is created with header value 100.
    G/L account tab: Additional line is added with value 100.
    PO reference tab: No reference has been made here
    All the current SPRO settings allow me to save this invoice
    I should NOT be able to post Invoice without reference to PO.
    I am looking for functional solution as I am having trouble with user exits, any further comments welcome.
    Regards Steve

  • Third Party Process Issue

    Hello Friends,
    Need Your Inputs for below issue"
    in third party process: SO is created with 2 line items, -->PR-->PO--> Vendor delivers only 1 item and MIRO is done for it,
    But
    During Creation of Customer invoice Both Line items are considered in the Invoice(F2)
    1st line item with the Value of X Rs,  and 2nd Line item with zero value ( as there is no delivery done to customer and hence no invoice via MIRO)
    Requirement is:
    The 2nd Line item should not be considered at all during Customer invoice creation.
    Item cate used is TAS with billing relevance F (i,e standard config)
    Kinldy help
    regards

    hello srinu..
    SO is created with 2 line items, PR is auto created. 1 PO is created (with 2 line items)
    MIRO is done w.r.t PO line item 10 only,
    then when i create customer invoice from SO i get 2 line items, for 1st line item there is value populated. 2nd line item has zero value,
    The requirement is that if there is no Processing of SO for line item 2 ,, then it should not be populated in the customer invoice.
    Regards

  • Error in MIRO Field Cost Ctr required Message No F5808

    Hi SAP Gurus,
    Kindly help and advise me on what needs to be done. I encountered an error while doing miro for asset.  Error is as follows:
    Field Cost Ctr is a required field for G/L account 1200 161200
    Message no. F5808
    Diagnosis
    The value for field "Cost Ctr" in the interface to Financial Accounting is an initial value but you are required to make an entry in the field selection for G/L account "161200" in company code "1200" linked to the field selection for posting key "70".
    Please advise on any setup required to correct the error above. I will give full points to those who will help.
    Thank you very much in advance...
    Thanks and regards,
    Jodette

    The FSG of the gl accounts does not really require a cost center. However, the asset master data already have a cost center attached to it.
    I can not do a depreciation run as well as MIRO.
    Please help and advise what needs to be done.
    Thanks in advance
    Regards,
    Jodette

  • Posting on required field for CO-PA in MIRO

    We are using MIRO for all our postings on vendors (one workflow)
    When we are making postings is possible in a situation that we crated the CO-PA posting without the required field for CO-PA.
    Steps:
    We fill in all information from the posting like  Business area and Profit center.
    Click on Prof. Segment (now you see the required fields)
    Click on Cancel
    Click on Prof. Segment (now company code, Business area and Profit center are filed in and can not be changed)
    Click on Continue
    Now the Prof. Segment is green and we save the posting without the required fields for CO-PA
    We are working on version 4.6. With the transaction FB60 it is not possible to create the same situation.
    How we can solve this problem?
    Thanks
    Paul

    Hi Anantha,
    We are using only MIRO for vendor postings. The reason is that there is one central center that is scanning in the invoices and sent them around with work-flow. To keep it simple we are using only MIRO.
    Paul

  • Account requires an assignment to a CO object in MIRO

    Dear Experts,
                      Can anyone tell me why in OKb9 the Cost Element (small price diff) is not picking up the Profit center even though it is assigned in the default settings.
    In OKB9 I have assigned 3 i,e, prf Centre is mandatory. The cost element is assigned in transaction key DIFF in OBYC, rules selected for debit/credit.
    All other CE are picking the PC from OKB9, except this.
    So in MIRO, while rounded off, the balance amt picking the the CE but not the PC, so the system throwing error " Account 4.......... requires an assignment to a CO object"
    Please help me out asap
    Abhi

    hi abhi
    the thing is based on what you have said above ... you have assigned values in the coloumn of profit center rather than a cost center  in tcode   OKB9...
    and secondly let me clear one more thing in here i mean OKB9 you need to first assign your cost element comp code leave the cost center and profit center blank  but dont forget to assign 1 in the column 'A"   and save it.....
    then select your newly assigned cost element in OKB9  and double click on detail per business area/ valuation area ...
    in there select new entries and assign each of your plants to the cost center if its  an expense                                                                               
    or a profit center if its a revenue
    i guess you even try to change 3  by assineing 1= valuation area is mandatory  i guess this can also work .. the above was an explaination for working with OKB9
    regards
    sayeed
    Edited by: sayeed bakhressa on Feb 7, 2009 2:15 PM

  • Client require the Downpayment adjust at MIRO to get budget availability.

    Client require the Downpayment adjust at MIRO to get budget availability.
    During MIRO system shows the downpayment made to the vendor but it was not adjusted while creating vendor liability and extra budgets were consumed. If there is no extra budget then the system does not allow MIRO. In that situation we are clearing the vendor down payment through F-54, which made the availability of budget again and allow to do MIRO.
    Is there any configuration in which vendor down payment shall be automaticaly adjusted during MIRO?

    Hi ,
    In standar behaviour of the system you wont be able to achieve automatic adjustement of advances .
    Kindly use the BADI - INVOICE_UPDATE to make the necessary enhancement that you are looking for .
    In the BADI you can use the method - CHANGE_AT_SAVE for the same .
    Discuss the same with you abaper as to how best you can make use of it.
    Regards ,
    Dewang T

  • Making "Business Place" field Required in MIRO

    Dear fellow SAPers,
    Can anyone please tell me how to maintain the status of  "Business Place" field in MIRO as Required? The client wants to ensure that this field is populated everytime MIRO is done, irrespective of the user.
    Please Help,
    Thanks,
    Amit Bharti

    Hi,
    To make the business place field required for MIRO, you can write the validation as below:-
    Step 1:-
    Create a message ID via transaction code SE91 for message class /EACC/MSG/ACC_COMP.
    Step 2:-
    Go to transaction GGB0 and create the validation step at line item level in Financial Accounting as below:-
    Pre Requisits:-
          BKPF-TCODE = 'MIRO' AND BSEG-BLART = 'K'.
    Check:-
          BSEG-BUPLA = ' '.
    Message:-
         Message created in step 1 as error message.
    Step 3:-
    Please also check that this validation has active status (Status=1) at line item level for your company code in transaction OB28.
    Regards,
    Gaurav

  • Tax juridiction field required in MIRO

    hi
    from which T.code we can control the fields of T.code MIRO because it is showing Tax jurisdiction field as required i want to make it as optional field i want to post invoice with out this field entry. so please advise me on this. you will be rewarded with points.

    go to OMRM.
    here enter the Message no. M8249 as Note in window or Switch off message.then check if ur problem gets solved.
    regards,
    indranil

  • Required help for badi for GL tab in MIRO transaction

    Hi,
    I am working in MIRO transaction.
    I am having a requirement as below:
    While creating invoices, In the gl tab when we enter gl account number system should populate Tax jurisdiction code by default.
    I am using BADI EXTENSION_US_TAXES method MM_ITEM_TAX_MODIFY but it populates the tax jurisdiction in PO reference tab not in GL tab.
    Please advice
    Regards,
    Suvarna Nandi

    Hi
    Have you tried with enhancement FYTX0002? See also Note 302998 - Collecting fields for user-exit. It's an idea.
    I hope this helps you
    Regards
    Eduardo

  • Payment Method Required - MIRO and MIR7

    We need to make the Payment Method Required for Logistics Credit Memo's.  If possible we would also like to customize the error/warning message when the user leaves out a Payment Method.
    Thank you, David Tanner

    hi,
    Use MIRO for verifying  the invoice
    In some case they use MIR7 to park and finally they post the same.
    What is your exact question Please tell in details
    G.Ganesh Kumar

  • Warning message required when we chnage invoicing party in MIRO

    HI All,
    Our client require the below settings.
    If we change the invoicing party in MIRO which is different than the PO vendor then system should throw warning message or pop up.
    I had tried to convence them that it can impact scenarios but they says they require warning message at least so that if anybody is changing the Invoicing party then he will get the message.
    I had tried by maintaining M8286 message in OBA5 but i didnt got the warining.
    Please suggest how we can achieve this.
    Regards,
    Umesh

    Dear,
    Take ABAPer help to make a warning/error message - if invoicing party chaged.
    Secondly please go through OSS : 322430 & 1156325.
    Also BADI for changing payment terms in MIRO "MRM_PAYMENT_TERMS ".
    Regards,
    Syed Hussain.

  • Unplanned delivery costs requirements in MIRO

    hello,
    at present we are using sap ecc 6.0. While doing MIRO at present, the Unplanned delivery cost are taxed. Client has the requirement that they should have options to choose whether they should tax or not tax the unplanned delivery costs. is there a way to give them this option.
    Edited by: soumyaps on Feb 10, 2011 10:35 AM

    Hello,,
    Sometimes, during the creation of a PO, we will not be knowing the actual Delivery / Freight Costs to enter in the PO. This will be known or available at the time of Goods Receipt. At that time we may have to change the PO and enter the Freight and then do the GR. Some times if already some GRs are made for a PO and for the latest delivery the Freight Vendor has charged some amount then changing the PO option also will not be correct.
    During these situations we can use the Unplanned Delivery Charges in MIRO and enter the amount and post it
    Check this answered links
    Re: Unplanned delivery costs
    MIRO unplanned delivery costs.
    Re: unplanned delivery cost - miro
    Re: configure Unplanned Delivery Cost Account
    Regards
    Mahesh Naik.

  • Notification required if 70 % of MIRO is done for a PO

    Dear Experts,
    I have one scenario which i like to share and want your valuable input on this.
    In business scenario as a PO created and MIGO and MIRO done for that PO. So what we required that is if during MIRO process the invoice amount in reference of PO reaches to 70 % of PO amount then it should generate some kind of notification, reminder or message(POPUP).
    So is there any configuration setting available through which it can achieved in SAP or i have to look for ABAPER's help.
    Please suggest some FM if it can help me in some way.
    Regards
    Arun

    HI,
    not available in stranded sap check with ABAPER  to get a popup
    Thanks,
    Raviteja

Maybe you are looking for

  • BPEL 10.1.2 hub-and-spoke or distributed architecture?

    Hi, I'm currently wrestling with the following question:BPEL 10.1.2 hub-and-spoke or distributed architecture? Hi, I'm currently wrestling with the following question: An ESB as per definition of e.g. Forrester should be capable of supporting a distr

  • Magic canvas recipe box

    I just got a galaxy tablet and would like to transfer the recipes from the magic canvas recipe box either directly to the tablet or to a thumb drive.  I can't figure out how to go about it.  I have Windows 7.  I was successful with the pdf files.  An

  • Unusual hard disk activity after "Erase free space"

    I have two partitions on my hard disk - a small partition for the system software and a big partition for everything else. A few days ago, I backed up a few files from my big partition and then used Disk Utility "Erase free space". Since then, my har

  • Draw inside, clipping masks & Live paint

    I made a drawing of a stone floor excavation and I used 'draw inside' to delimit the excavation borders as below: and this is what it looks like with edit contents selected: Sadly, I also wanted to carry on drawing in 'Live paint' mode to 'colour in'

  • Why does Mavericks still show as not installed

    I did a clean install of Mavericks from usb and in the MAS, still shows that I have not downloaded Mavericks.  Grey button still says 'download'.  See screenshot. Is there a way to have it change to 'installed', so that MAS recognizes that it is down