MIRO: Vendor with 3 bankdata

Hi,
we have an vendor with 3 bankdata. When i use MIRO to enter an Incoming Invoice i get allways
the first Bankdata.
Is there any way to allowed the user to select one of the three bankdata in Miro?
Thanks.
Regards, Dieter

Hi,
check these threads:
Vendor with Multiple Bank Account in MIRO
More than one Bank a/c during MIRO.
there´s also the possibility of a substitution:
http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/ABAP/SubstitutionRule%28UserExit%29inFI-FB60forPartnerBankType
Best regards.
Edited by: Pablo Casamayor on Mar 8, 2011 11:38 AM

Similar Messages

Vendor with 2 VAT numbers and MIRO tr

Hello,
If I have a vendor with 2 VAT numbers (t-code xk03), i.e., one for PL by default and another one for FR. When the customer in t-code MIRO wants to choose VAT number for FR it let him do it, but then if we go to the FI document xxxxxxxxxxx, in the "additional data" still comes up PL unspite was chosen FR.
So, the question is why does it happen this way and how we can choose and keep FR?
B. Regards
Francisco

Hello,
What I see from MIRO is that if you work with a vendor with VAT reg. number"PL", (also thi vendor has alternative VAT no. for FR,and this is what I need for the invoice), and change in MIRO Reporting country to "FR" the alternative vendor VAT, the financial invoice (51........) will take the original VAT vendor number "PL", (that I change it before to FR with Rep. country in MIRO).
How can I create a financial invoice with the other VAT no. (FR) for this vendor?
Regards

Vendor with multiple bank details....paid to the 1st bank account while inv

Hello Experts,
We have a vendor with two bank accounts in the vendor master. Now while making the payment, I mean, which account will the money goes? at the time of F110 , we paid to the 1st bank account in the vendor master..
Settings in vendor master:
I 'name' the bank accounts in the vendor master, in the field Bank Type. While posting through MIRO, insert this code into the line item 'Patner bank' and the payment program will pick up the bank account accordingly BUT If I don't add this information to the Patner bank account, than always the first bank account will be picked up..
I want that even if don't add any info in partner bank in the line item, at the time of F110 , it should paiy to the 2nd bank account in the vendor master..
This is a very stupid requiremnt but our users wants like this only.
Kindly show me some light in this dark tunnel...please.
regards,
nupur

Hi Nupur,
In vendor master data under 3rd tab where we record all bank details of the vendor left hand side you will find one column 'C' .i.e., Collection authorisation......kindly check this option for your second bank to which you want to make the payment.
Hope this helps you.
Regards,

User exit after selecting vendor with multiple bank accounts

Hi,
the requirement is that a pop-up should appear after the user selects a vendor with multiple bank accounts, in transaction MIRO, FB60, F-43 and a few other transactions.
I was thinking of a user exit. Honestly, I wonder if this is technically possible ?
Any hints welcome,
regards,
Rolf
Message was edited by:
Rolf Schorpion

HI
I believe u have to change the std programs to do that.
Max

Restrict P.O creatall vendor with a/c grp (Z006)

DEAR ALL
For the vendor group Z006 (Vendors-Original Manufacturers), no Accounting view nor other details related to payments, tax are being maintained. Still the users creates the P.O, subsequently executes MIGO, but during MIRO they face the error related to accounting. At this stage they realize that they have picked wrong vendor/ vendor account group. Then we have to reverse all the documents and create the same vendor with correct account group. So as to avoid all these wrong transaction execution we want to restrict the user to create the P.O for the vendor account group Z006
THANKS

hi
without purchase view system will not pick up migo
s plz check that
try extending the vendor for purchaseing
then try doing migo , i think it will work
reward if helpful
regards
kunal

HOW TO DISPLAY VENDOR WITH NO OPEN CLEARED ITEMS

Hi All,
We want to delete some of the vendors which do not have any open or cleared items. Can anyone tell me the report ,T Code or ant table which we can run to display the vendors with no open ,clear items.

you will have to first block the vendor for the posting in co.codes using FK05 and then assign that vendor for deletion flag using FK06 , in the next archive run it will be deleted automatically.
You cant just delete the vendor from the system
Assign points if helpful.
Shefford

How to reconcile A/P invoices on vendor with positive balance (they own us

Hi there,
I have two questions on B1.
I posted an A/P invoice to a vendor with positive balance (they own us money). How do I close this A/P invoice without outgoing payment? I don't want to pay them because they own us money on A/P G/L account.
There is another situation, I posted an A/P credit memo with large amount ($1000) and an A/P invoice with small amount ($200) on same vendor. How do I close the A/P invoice to that A/P credit memo with offset amount?
Thanks for help!
David

Hi there,
We are using B1 2005A SP1. I create an A/P invoice from a vendor which owns us money. So I don't want to pay this invoice. How do I close this invoice?
The other question is, how to I offset an open A/P invoice with small amount to an A/P credit memo created before (not linked to any other A/P invoice) with large amount and close the A/P invoice?
I am sure about the accounting rules on this issue. We are a Canadian company.
Thanks a lot
David

Posting the MIRO Document with reference of PO

Hello friends
while user posting the MIRO Document with reference of PO , he is getting difference in balance
Total amount is 31,237.00
Posting amount is 28,320.05
Balance amount is 2,916.95 this balance amount not getting post in MIRO
Before that i have seen GR amount is 28,320.05 but In IR amount same 28,320.05 but withholding tax tab not appering withholding tax amount
Can any body please help me on the same
Regards
sudharshana vamsi
Edited by: asuvamsi on Feb 24, 2010 1:43 PM

Hello friends
Thanks For all my problem was resloved
Solution is
An message has been occuring like withhold tax has been refreshed. it is just an information message not an error message. this message will trigger when the trans. type is non project type activity. No back end process has been disturbed due to this message. it just passing the information to the user.
we changed the trans. type to manufacturing activity and it is working fine.
I hope it ll help in future
Thanks and Regards
vamsi

Third-party not defined in the case of vendor with plant assignment ?

We use a Third-Party Vendor to direct-ship some products directly to our Customers.
When transfers third party order form's PR STO PO, prompts the following information
Third-party not defined in the case of vendor with plant assignment
Message no. 06769
Diagnosis
You are entering a purchase transaction involving a vendor to whom a plant has been assigned. Normally, this will involve the transfer of materials from one plant to another.
This process necessitates a delivery and a billing document in the SD system. The PO appears directly in the delivery due list of the issuing plant (vendor) and therefore does not need to be transmitted.
However, an item with the procurement form "third-party" (triangular business deal) cannot appear in the delivery due list.
Procedure
An item with the procurement form "third-party" can only be ordered from vendors without a plant assignment.
how should solve?
Many thanks, Adny.
Edited by: Andy Yao on Feb 8, 2010 3:58 AM

Hi Andy
Why u doing stock transfer order,in third party sales there is no stock transfer
Follow below procees for third party sales( Vendor ship materials directly to customer)
Create Sales order(Use item category TAS) >>> Purachase requisition(Automatically from order) >>> Purchase order >>> Vendor Invoice Verification >>> Invoice to customer
Kapil

F110 Payment to vendor with several bank accounts

Hi to all,
I have a vendor with 2 bank accounts, each one for its subisidiaries .
We pay this vendor's head office via transfer and to do so, use transaction F110. Depending on the subsidiary, our vendor wants us to use one account or the other.
All open items go under the head office number, my question is: how do I assign the right bank account to the open items?
I tried with the alternative payer funcionality but did not work.
Can you please help?
Cheers

The BVTYP is free. If a bank account accepts only one currency, the easiest is to take this currency as BVTYP in LFBK. You should have your own rules for the others cases: for example BVTYP 'EUR' for euro and 'OTHE' for all others currencies. You should use substitution with user exit. If you don't know the technique, please search in forums with keyword 'RGGBS000'.
The user exit should do the following (for example):
1) search in LFBK one row with LIFNR = BSEG-LIFNR and BVTYP = BKPF-WAERS.
if found then BSEG-BVTYP = BKPF-WAERS
2) if not found, search in LFBK one row with LIFNR = BSEG-LIFNR and BVTYP = 'OTHE'.
if found then BSEG-BVTYP = 'OTHE'.
3) if not found, do nothing; BSEG-BVTYP remains empty.
- With such an exit, you have to fill BVTYP in LFBK only when the suppllier has more than 1 bank account.
- You should also decide whether BVTYP should be ready for input or not; if yes you should decide what has priority: user's input or substitution (but I think that leaving the field ready for input and overwrite it in substitution has no sense and is dangerous, so in this case the substitution should do nothing for non empty BSEG-BVTYP).

Function or bapi returning customers or vendors with open items

Dear experts.
may you please tell me which function or bapi can i use that will return all customers or vendors with open items per given plant. i have tried to use BAPI_AR_ACC_GETOPENITEMS and BAPI_AP_ACC_GETOPENITEMS but they return open items for a given customer and vendor respectively per given company code.

willard,
the term "open items per given plant" is not defined exactly. VENDORS and CUSTOMERS are not linked to specific plant. GOODS are produced and stotred in one or more plants. They may be sold by a sales organization linked to a company code. Copany may have seral plants.
That may be one reason for SAP not to provide the function you are looking for.
Please give more information about company structure and sales and purchase process.
Regards,
Clemens

Function or bapi returning customers or vendors with open items per plant

Dear experts.
may you please tell me which function or bapi can i use that will return all customers or vendors with open items per given plant. i have tried to use BAPI_AR_ACC_GETOPENITEMS and BAPI_AP_ACC_GETOPENITEMS but they return open items for a given customer and vendor respectively per given company code.

ok but those 2 BAPIs return open items after providing the customer or vendor. what i need is a BAPI which returns a list of customers or vendors with open items

Link between custom MIRO & vendor MIRO

hello experts
i'm creating a J2 [Purchase Register] report for filing returns.
in case for imports, is there any relation between custom MIRO & vendor MIRO apart from PO.
have taken the base as MIRO in case of DOMESTIC and would also want the same for import.
kindly post the flow for any other suggestions
regards
pawan

Hello Ilesh,
I don't want this, i get the GRN no from MSEG , I want MIRO no for this
it is wrong
MSEG-MBLNR == EKBE-BELNR
MSEG-MJAHR == EKBE-GJAHR
MSEG-ZEILE == EKBE-BUZEI
MSEG-EBELN == EKBE-EBELN
MSEG-EBELP == EKBE-EBELP
MSEG-ZEKKN == EKBE-ZEKKN
as i want RSEGBELNR , which is same as EKBEBELNR , where vgabe = 2,
and i can't put MSEG-ZEILE == EKBE-BUZEI
Regards,
Aastha

With holding tax base amount for 1099 vendors with discounted payment term

Hi Friends,
We have a below situation for 1099 vendors,
Some of the 1099 vendors are set-up in the system with payment term with discounts i.e. 2% if paid within 10 days
As per config, system posts with holding tax base amount at the time of posting payment.
With holding tax rate is 0%,
Based on modified net amount calculation
and
Cash discount calculation before w/tax calculation
When we have vendor with input tax, system excludes tax amount at the time of payment but for the with holding tax base calculation amount system does not exclude input tax type.
Which causes difference in 1099 misc vendors
Below is the example of how system calculates the amount.
Invoice $ 1000, payment term 2% if paid within 10 days. Input tax 7.25%
Payment going out=
$1000- $ 72.5(tax 7.25%) = $ 927.5 18.55 [2% discount] = $ 908.95 (payment amount)
With holding base calculation =
$ 1000 100 (2% discount) = $ 900
Difference between payment going out and with holding tax base = 908.98 900 = 8.98
Can some one please tell me how to get rid off this difference?
Moreover, please tell me if its normal to have 1099 vendors with discounted payment term.
Any thoughts on above situation will be helpful
Edited by: Shefford William on Jan 28, 2008 11:36 PM

Dear All
i am also having the same problem. The example is
Net invoice Value   = $ 100,000
Input Tax @ 15%   = $ 15,000
Total Invoice Value = $ 115,000
Cash Discount = 20% with in 20 days
On payment the system behavior should be
Debit Vendor invoice Value   = $ 115,000
Debit Cash Discount @ 20%    = $   20,000   ( 20% of the Net Invoice Value that is 20% of $ 100,000)
Credit W/H Tax deduction @ 3.5% = $ 3,325 ( 3.5% of 95,000 the Inv Value - Cash Discount that is $ 115,000 - $20,000)
Credit Bank Account = $ 91,675 ( Inv value - Cash Dic - W/H tax that is $ 115,000 - 20,000 - 3325 = 91,675)
However at the time of payment system is calculating tax as follows
Debit Vendor invoice Value   = $ 115,000
Debit Cash Discount @ 20%    = $   20,000   ( 20% of the Net Invoice Value that is 20% of $ 100,000)
Credit W/H Tax deduction @ 3.5% = $ 3,220 ( 3.5% of 92,000 the Inv Value - Cash Discount that is $ 115,000 - $23,000. This $ 23,000 is only calculated for W/H tax calculation that is 20% of $ 115,000 )
Credit Bank Account = $ 91,780 ( Inv value - Cash Dis - W/H tax that is $ 115,000 - 20,000 - 3220 = 91,780)
this is not the common practice when using the net base value in the system.
Can any one help me in this regard. I really have been stucked in this problem for many days
Regards
Bilal Athar

Material return to vendor with Nota fiscal

Hi,
Could any one suggest me the process of return materials to vendor with nota fiscal document.
Thanks,

pls reply

MIRO: Vendor with 3 bankdata

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for