Mis match in attributes of item category B-limit and PO item details
Hi
I could not able to create a Blanket PO with document type FO and item category B (limit).
Normally for a blanket PO, GR is not allowed and IR is mandatory. So, I could able to see these checkboxes for GR (not set and grayed) and IR (set and grayed) in the item details of the PO in delivery and invoice tabs. But I end with an error message that 'GR is not set is used is not allowed' (exactly i don't remember but some thing like that)
Before creating a blanket PO, I found that in 'attributes of item categories', that for the item category B, GR is set and IR is not set (in customizing-OMH4). Of course, one cannot change the attributes of item categories.
I suppose due to this mis-match in the attributes of item categories and that in the PO, I'm getting an error message while creating a blanket PO and could not able to save.
Also I have checked all the system messages for the message displayed. No where(i.e. in any message class or category and for that message number) I found any such message defined with error in 'attributes of system messages' for purchasing, material master, inventory, invoice verification etc.
I suppose this error message is coming somewhere from the application program for the PO.
So, what can be the solution
waiting for your reply.
thank you
Message was edited by:
srinivas vandana
Thank you for your answer. I haven't mention this point in my thread but I have already tried this.
I have tried matching the GR and IR controls of account assignment category with PO GR, IR controls and also with item category B, GR, IR controls. Still i am getting the same error and could not able to save the PO
Also I have checked the field settings for PO for all categories like transaction relevant, item category relevant, etc in customizing.
Main problem is both GR and IR controls are being grayed in PO. Other wise I could able to change them as per my wish and could able to avoid the error even though the GR and IR controls in PO are correct as per the process requirement.
If possible, please check the GR and IR controls for item category B (in my system it showing that GR is set with binding and IR is not set with binding). But it should be reverse as per the process requirements and in limit PO it is showing correctly. i.e. with GR is not set with binding and IR is set with binding.
thank you
Similar Messages
-
PR with combination of item category B = limit, and account assignment : F
Hi,
Is it possible to create a blanket purchase order/framework requisition with combination item category B = limit, and account assignment : F ?
Thanks in advance.
Sachin
Edited by: Sachin on Sep 20, 2011 12:05 PMHi A.Purihella / Raj,
Thanks for your reply
I have maintained the B and F combination in the customization.
But when I am creating the PR using item category B with account assignment F (order) and after pressing enter, this account assignment F vanished from the PR and that field also turns in to gray mode. So system is not allowing to use u2018Fu2019 with B item category.
Have you used or tested this scenario of using combination item category B with account assignment F (order) in PR and PO.
Best Regards,
Sachin -
Mis match in attributes of item category B and Blanket PO item details
Hi
I could not able to create a Blanket PO with document type FO and item category B (limit).
Normally for a blanket PO, GR is not allowed and IR is mandatory. So, I could able to see these checkboxes for GR (not set and grayed) and IR (set and grayed) in the item details of the PO in delivery and invoice tabs. But I end with an error message that 'GR is not set is used is not allowed' (exactly i don't remember but some thing like that)
Before creating a blanket PO, I found that in 'attributes of item categories', that for the item category B, GR is set and IR is not set (in customizing-OMH4). Of course, one cannot change the attributes of item categories.
I suppose due to this mis-match in the attributes of item categories and that in the PO, I'm getting an error message while creating a blanket PO and could not able to save.
Also I have checked all the system messages for the message displayed. No where(i.e. in any message class or category and for that message number) I found any such message defined with error in 'attributes of system messages' for purchasing, material master, inventory, invoice verification etc.
I suppose this error message is coming somewhere from the application program for the PO.
So, what can be the solution
waiting for your reply.
thank youThank you for your answer. I haven't mention this point in my thread but I have already tried this.
I have tried matching the GR and IR controls of account assignment category with PO GR, IR controls and also with item category B, GR, IR controls. Still i am getting the same error and could not able to save the PO
Also I have checked the field settings for PO for all categories like transaction relevant, item category relevant, etc in customizing.
Main problem is both GR and IR controls are being grayed in PO. Other wise I could able to change them as per my wish and could able to avoid the error even though the GR and IR controls in PO are correct as per the process requirement.
If possible, please check the GR and IR controls for item category B (in my system it showing that GR is set with binding and IR is not set with binding). But it should be reverse as per the process requirements and in limit PO it is showing correctly. i.e. with GR is not set with binding and IR is set with binding.
thank you -
Item Category Completion rule and Copy Control for contract reference
Hi
We are creating sales document wrt contract. The item category completion rule for item category WVN is C i.e. item is completed after target quantity is fully referenced.
We dont want to change this but we want that even if the target quantity is fully referenced one particular type of sales document should still be allowed to be created with reference to this contract.
Please guide how can I achieve this.
Thank You
Brajendra ShrivastavaHi
Is it possible to remove the item category completion rule and then restrict one particular document type or item category for only one time reference . In other words to apply completion rule at document type or tiem category level. -
Sales Order Item Category change of all line items on Save
Dear all,
I want to change the sales order line item category of all sales order lines on save. i tried to write the logic to change the values of item category in USEREXIT_SAVE_DOCUMENT_PREPARE. it changing the SO line item category but it not changing corresponding shedule line item category and even i try to change the corresponing shedule line item category, than system not prompting new schedule lines according to changes in the item category and its dates. Kindly, if any one knows any exit or process to change the item category of schedule line let me know
Regards,
ManojDear,
Thanks for your reply, i changed the item category of SO line item and shedule line item in the xvbap and xvbep and i changed updkz to U. i have two item categories ( i.e YNAA and YNAB ) for YNAB system automaticallty creates Purchase requisation, If i change the item catergory in the user exit TO_VBEP . system not creating the PR for YNAB. by the time control comes to TO_VBEP user exit system already detemining shedule line and sale order line items category in XVBAP and XVBEP . if i change any thing at this place system giving error while saving .
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Manoj
Edited by: manoj kv on Dec 26, 2010 4:40 PM -
Item Category Determination for sales document- Item USAGE
Hi dear all.
I read already the discussions held around this subject, as I'm facing a similar problem for which I cannot find a solution.
I have the need to set up a ItCat determination for sales order ZPD.
The proposed ItCat must be <b>ZPDW</b>. However, for the NORM ItCat Group we have already a setup which cannot be changed.
This is the present status.
SaTy ItCatGrp Usage HLevItCat Proposed ItCat
ZPD NORM ZPD
I need that the proposed ItCat is ZPDW, under the same conditions
SaTy ItCatGrp Usage HLevItCat Proposed ItCat
ZPD NORM ? ZPDW
For that I believe that I'll have to play along with the Usage.
But how?
What triggers an USAGE during sales order creation? Is it related to the entered material. In a NORM material, how can a usage be deducted?
Thanks for your feedback on this issue.
Rui ViegasIt is possible , either one of the item category u can make as proposed and another one as manual. So while creating sale order u need to change it manually
Sam -
Item category (Customized )ZJT1 and MRP type for material is not allowed
Hi Guys,
When i try to create the order i see the error as item category and MRP type of the material is not allowed.
I checked in Vov5 table, i could observe that Schedule line category is maintained.
Could you please help us in resolving this..
Thanks and regards,
RahulHi,
Please assign the Item Category ZJTI and MRP type (for eg: PD) assigned to the schedule line category in IMG under Sales and Distribution--> Sales ---> Schedule line -->Assign schedule line
Hope this resolve your issue
Regards,
KrishnaO -
Manual item category gets overridden by default item category
When I enter a manual item category for a material in a sales order, it gets overwritten by the default item category maintained in VOV4 (maintained for the order type and item category group. This is in ECC6. It is working in 4.7 though. How do we permit the manuaul item category to be entered and not get overwritten by default item category?
Hi,
You have not mentioned in VOV4, manual item category has been maintained or not. Can you check the values are maintained in those column?
Also in the debug mode, you can check whether any user exit is restricting this.
Regards, -
Item category for delivery and order related billing.
Hi All,
I have am faceing one problem in QEC. My client having delivery related billing and order related billing. For we have maintain only one billling document(order related and delivery related).
I have a item category in the sales order Zo09 for this item category system allowing the user to create both billing documents(order and delivery related) Please advise how i can stop the users to create delivery related and order related.
but we have configured delivery related eventhough system allowing to create both billing documents.
Please do needful.
Thanks,
KV
Edited by: kv on May 8, 2009 11:54 AMHi
My client having delivery related billing and order related billing. For we have maintain only one billling document (order related and delivery related).
What is the meaning of this statement ?
Say in a single order or order type say OR there can be two materials with different item categories say TAN and ZTAN and
TAN with billing relevance as A( delivery related billing) and ZTAN with billing relevance as B (order related billing )
If that happens the billing will be split
In VOV8 we mention for OR the order related billing as F1 and delivery related billing as F2 in the billing tab
Now in billing TAN will pick F2 as it is delivery related billing
and
ZTAN will pick F1 as it is order related billing
Suppose in your sales doc type if you have mentioned both as F2 then also there will a billing split in billing there will be two F2 invoices TAN will pick one F2 invoice and ZTAN will pick another F2 invoice and this is a wrong way of doing things
I have a item category in the sales order Zo09 for this item category system allowing the user to create both billing documents(order and delivery related) Please advise how i can stop the users to create delivery related and order related
How can one item category can pick both order related and delivery related billing?
Not at all possible in SAP as we can mention only one control in the billing relevance field in item cat
Your issue needs more clarity about your problem for suggesting some suitable help
Regards
Raja -
Item category grey out and cannot change
I created an item category ZTAC with Structure scope= D. During sales order entry, the item category is grey out and cannot be changed.
Is there a way or any config to allow changes?
Regards
PSKYou can check the changebility of the item category in program
MV45AFFE_FELDAUSWAHL_STATUS. SAP Note 208245 helps explain the logic.
In Form FELDAUSWAHL_VBAP-MATNR_SPEZ you encounter the following piece
of code that sets CH_SUBRC to 1, because of field TVAP-STRUM:
4 SAPMV45A FORM FELDAUSWAHL_VBAP-MATNR_SPEZ
3 SAPMV45A FORM FELDAUSWAHL_VBAP-MATNR
2 SAPMV45A FORM FELDAUSWAHL_STATUS
1 SAPMV45A MODULE (PBO) FELDAUSWAH
XVBAPF-VMENGE > 0 OR
XVBUP-FKSTA CA 'BC' OR
VBAP-PROSA EQ CHARC OR
TVAP-STRUM CN 'E ' OR <<<<< Here
start Revenue Recognition Project
no more changes after revenue is recognized
XVBUP-RRSTA CA 'BC' OR
end Revenue Recognition Project
VBAP-ANZSN > 0 OR
VBAP-VKGRU = VKGRU_DYN_POSTEN OR
VBAP-VKGRU = VKGRU_DYN_POSTEN_AG OR
( VBAP-KZVBR NE SPACE AND NOT
( VBAP-KZVBR EQ KZVBR_P AND VBAP-PS_PSP_PNR IS INITIAL ) AND
XVBUP-UPDKZ NE UPDKZ_NEW ) OR
( not VBAP-KALNR is initial AND
XVBUP-UPDKZ NE UPDKZ_NEW ).
CH_SUBRC = 1. <<<<< Here
EXIT.
Because TVAP-STRUM is equal to 'D' and CH_SUBRC = 1 is causing
SCREEN-INPUT = 0 (not changeable) in the following piece of code:
2 SAPMV45A FORM FELDAUSWAHL_STATUS
1 SAPMV45A MODULE (PBO) FELDAUSWAHL
Main Program SAPMV45A
Source code of MV45AFFE_FELDAUSWAHL_STATUS
when 'MATNR'.
perform feldauswahl_vbap-matnr changing sy-subrc.
if sy-subrc > 0.
screen-input = 0. <<<< Here
endif.
You may use USEREXIT_FIELD_MODIFICATION in MV45AFZZ to open this field
if needed. If you set SCREEN-INPUT to 1 when SCREEN-NAME = 'VBAP-PSTYV',
etc you will be able to enter the item category.
I hope this helps.
Gerard
Edited by: Gerard Magorrian on Oct 15, 2010 10:07 PM -
Framework Order (FO) with Item Category B- Limit
Hi , I have created one FO with item Category B , How I can enter invoice against that order?
I have already tried it using MIRO . Is there any settings needed in customising . Please guide
Edited by: Bhushan Bivalkar on Jul 8, 2010 12:53 PM>
Bhushan Bivalkar wrote:
> Hi , I have created one FO with item Category B , How I can enter invoice against that order?
> I have already tried it using MIRO . Is there any settings needed in customising . Please guide
>
> Edited by: Bhushan Bivalkar on Jul 8, 2010 12:53 PM
You do MIRO against FO the same way you do IR against Normal PO. FO is also a different document type and is considered a PO,
just there is no GR taking place for FO document. -
What's the difference of Item Class value:Header and Line Item in AME Rule
Hi All,
when creating a Rule or Attribute,there is a Item Class property,which contains Header and Line Item two values.
Can anybody pls help me clarify the difference?
thx,
edmund.This information can be found in the Approvals Management implementation guide in metalink. The part number for this document is B31622-02
Regards -
User Exits for Item Category Determination based on Item Category Usage
Hi Gurus,
If I need to create a new item category usage code and perform item category determination using the new item category usage code, is there a user exit or function module which is able to perform this?
Thanks & RegardsHi Lawrence Tam,
If you are going to create a new item category usage to determine an item category, you need to add a new line in transaction VOV4 for the new combination of sales document type + Item Cat. group + usage + high leve item cat. to determine the item category.
Thanks in advance,
Mariano. -
Not able to select Item category in KE27
Dear Experts,
I created a characteristic Item Category and I derivate this field through a user exit. When I tried to run KE27 excluding by Item category (some materials from specific item categories must not be revaluated), the system generates error KG018, not allowing me to put the item category in the selection.
Item categories doesnt show up in match code as its derived by a user exit.
Question: How can I make it possible to select the item category information in KE27?
Is it possible to derive to CO-PA direct from VBRP?
Is the error because I derive it from user-exit?
Kind Regards
Mayumi BlakI found the answer myself!
I have to create the options for the characteristics in KES1.
KR
Mayumi Blak -
CRM Service Ticket - Item Category error - IC Webclient
Hi
Once I confirm the customer account, I click on "Service Ticket".
I'm getting the following error "No Item Category could be created". I've taken a look at a few of the Item Category Groups & Usages and none of them appear to be exactly related to a Service Ticket. I believe this maybe the issue.
Would anyone have some guidance on this.
Points will be awarded for the right info.
Many Thanks
ArdenThanks Johnny
Do you know if this resolves the issue with the creation of the Service Ticket or does it just make it easier to link the Header & Item Level attributes.
Points awarded
Regards
Arden
Maybe you are looking for
-
Copying Between iTunes on 2 computers with same Apple ID
I use 2 computers with the same apple id for iTunes. My main iTunes acct is on a computer with no cd drive. When I import cds onto the secondary computer, how can I get those albums to iTunes on my main computer? Family Sharing doesn't seem to help s
-
The new google streetview (which does not use Flash) is unusable and renders very slow starting with pixelated images that progressively build. The slowness is not present in FF30.0 on Windows. It seems to be an issue in Linux Mint as well: http://fo
-
Down payment Request(f-37)
Hi when i attend to post down payment Request(customer) the system wants vendor code inspite of customer?
-
Change a int into a char or unhash a string hash
i need to know how to do one of the things in my title thanks :)
-
Problem in doSubmit()
Hi everyone, I want to use confirm message in javascript and call it by clicking a button...If the message is true, I set the doSubmit('my req'), I has written some pl/sql process and want to execute if condition is met..the condition is that request