Missed Call Notification in Exchange 2010/2013 coexistence mode

Dear all,
Context:
Lync 2013 Enterprise Voice, Exchange 2010 and Exchange 2013 in coexistence mode
Waiting complete migration, some users are always on exchange 2010
UM role is installed on both exchange server
The exchange servers UM are attached to only one UM Dial Plan
Scenario :
A call to a lync user. The caller hang-up before user announcement
Problem: Missed call notification doesn't work for user on Exchange 2010 (it's work fine for user on Exchange 2013)
Voice Messaging works fine
Troubleshooting / SIP Traces:
SIP Info is always send to Exchange 2013 even if user is on exchange 2010
SIP Info sent from Lync FE to Exchange 2013 UM :
TL_INFO(TF_PROTOCOL) [0]6330.3AE8::02/12/2015-12:25:23.575.015c018e (S4,SipMessage.DataLoggingHelper:sipmessage.cs(774))[1718622663]
>>>>>>>>>>>>Outgoing SipMessage c=[<SipTlsConnection_13ECA29>], 192.168.5.110:49786->192.168.5.203:5061
INFO sip:outlook.mydomain.com:5061;ms-fe=exchange2013-UM.mydomain.localdomain;transport=Tls SIP/2.0
FROM: <sip:A410AA79-D874-4e56-9B46-709BDD0EB850>;epid=8C75BE2D95;tag=35c2d8a65a
TO: <sip:exchange2013-UM.mydomain.localdomain;opaque=app:rtcevent;transport=tls>;epid=C4C2F4F6BA;tag=ac126413f
CSEQ: 43 INFO
CALL-ID: 535a07e2-8e82-4d13-8e03-bf43ad97602d
MAX-FORWARDS: 70
VIA: SIP/2.0/TLS 192.168.5.110:49786;branch=z9hG4bKd66442be
CONTACT: <sip:LyncFE-2013.mydomain.localdomain;transport=Tls>
CONTENT-LENGTH: 454
USER-AGENT: RTCC/5.0.0.0 Inbound Routing (Microsoft Lync Server 2013 5.0.8308.726)
CONTENT-TYPE: application/ms-rtc-usernotification+xml
- <UserNotification>
       <User>sip:[email protected]</User>
       <EumProxyAddress>EUM:[email protected];phone-context=UMDialPlan.mydomain.localdomain</EumProxyAddress>
       <Time>2015-02-12 12:25:23Z</Time>
       <Template>RtcDefault</Template>
    +  <Event  type="missed">
 </UserNotification>
------------EndOfOutgoing SipMessage
Answer from Exchange 2013 UM
TL_INFO(TF_PROTOCOL) [1]6330.2DF4::02/12/2015-12:25:23.642.015c2481 (S4,SipMessage.DataLoggingHelper:sipmessage.cs(774))[1718622663]
<<<<<<<<<<<<Incoming SipMessage c=[<SipTlsConnection_13ECA29>], 192.168.5.110:49786<-192.168.5.203:5061
SIP/2.0 200 OK
FROM: <sip:A410AA79-D874-4e56-9B46-709BDD0EB850>;tag=35c2d8a65a;epid=8C75BE2D95
TO: <sip:exchange2013-UM.mydomain.localdomain;opaque=app:rtcevent;transport=tls>;tag=ac126413f;epid=C4C2F4F6BA
CSEQ: 43 INFO
CALL-ID: 535a07e2-8e82-4d13-8e03-bf43ad97602d
VIA: SIP/2.0/TLS 192.168.5.110:49786;branch=z9hG4bKd66442be
CONTENT-LENGTH: 0
SUPPORTED: ms-dialog-route-set-update
SERVER: RTCC/5.0.0.0 MSExchangeUM/15.00.0995.028
ms-diagnostics-public: 15642;reason="Lync SIP INFO notifications are not supported for legacy users. User: EUM:[email protected];phone-context=UMDialPlan.mydomain.localdomain"
------------EndOfIncoming SipMessage
Gerald Cheminant

Hi,
This behavior is by design. Exchange 2010 server is not going to accept any SIP messages from Exchange 2013 server because it is not listed as UM IP Gateway. Therefore, even if Exchange 2013 redirected the SIP INFO packet to Exchange 2010, it will fail.
During migration\coexistance scenario, this feature (Missed call notifications from Lync server) will not work for legacy users whose mailbox is still in Exchange 2010.
Best Regards,
Eason Huang
Eason Huang
TechNet Community Support

Similar Messages

  • Outlook client requirements and Exchange 2010/2013 coexistence

    Good morning!
    A question regarding Exchange 2010/2013 coexistence and the Outlook client requirement. I am upgrading and about to install Exhange 2013 into an existing Exchange 2010 Org. The current 2010 Org is patched to SP-3 and Outlook Anywhere is currently disabled.
    I have Outlook clients that do not yet meet the minimun requirements for 2013 (Outlook 2007/2010). When I install my first 2013 server will it effect the current downlevel clients? The mailboxes are still in 2010 so my thoughts were since the Office upgrade
    including Outlook has not yet taken place I didn't want to wait for them to at least get 2013 into the Org. The 2013 server should effect the clients until I configure the CAS on 2013 and only when they are at the proper version, is this correct? Does Outlook
    Anywhere need to be first enabled and configured on the 2010 CAS before I attempt the confgiuration on the 2013 CAS? I just dont want to install 2013 and have Outlook connectivity issues right out of the gate...
    Thanks in advance!

    Outlook 2007 and 2010 are supported for Exchange 2013, you just need to push out the latest patches.
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa996719(v=exchg.150).aspx
    If you configure the URLs properly in Exchange 2013 to URLs that point to the Exchange 2010 servers, your clients shouldn't try to talk to the Exchange 2013 server.
    Ed Crowley MVP "There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems."

  • Exchange 2010/2013 coexistence: OWA proxy not working properly ":-( Something went wrong"

    Hi
    Exchange 2010 users are NOT able to connect to their mailboxes when they go through exchange 2013 OWA address.  We get a message that says following ---> "Something went wrong"
    Following is our URL.  The address is pointing to 2013 CAS loadbalancer VIP.  Outlook anywhere is working fine.  What is going on?
    Important: All my exchange 2010 / 2013 URIs are the same as suggested by Microsoft (Owa, ecp, activesync, ews, autodiscover): --> mail.domain.com/XXX

    Hello Rawa,
    Can you log on Exchange 2010 OWA using its localhost address?
    Please make sure the intenralurl value is set to Exchange 2010’s local host name and set the Externalurl to Null.
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb310763(v=exchg.141).aspx
    Thanks,
    Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact
    [email protected]
    Simon Wu
    TechNet Community Support

  • Search-Mailbox not attaching the infected emails in target folder and deleting the contents in exchange 2010 & 2013 coexistence

    Dear All,
    I have an issue with deleting circulated spam emails in my environment through search-mailbox
    We have Exchange 2010 & 2013  CU5 environment 
    I followed the search and destroy document for exchange 2010 
    http://windowsitpro.com/exchange-server-2010/search-destroy-email-content-exchange-2010
    Added the user to Discovery Management group
    Created a new role group as below 
    New-RoleGroup "Mailbox Import-Export Management" -Roles "Mailbox Import Export"
    Add-RoleGroupMember "Mailbox Import-Export Management" -Member Administrator
    I ran the below commands
    Search-Mailbox -Identity "[email protected]" -SearchQuery "Subject:'report'" -TargetMailbox "Administrator" -TargetFolder "Filter" -LogOnly -LogLevel Full
    The above command gets completed successfully and sends the log report  however im unable to see any attachments
    Similarly the deletecontent also gets completed successfully and logs result. But it does not delete the infected emails 
    Search-Mailbox -Identity  "[email protected]" -SearchQuery "Subject:'report'" -TargetMailbox "administrator" -TargetFolder "filter" -deletecontent -LogLevel Full
    Any idea why it is not fetching the infected emails in zip file and why it is not deleting but it is able to log in the target folder 
    Any help much appreciated
    Remember to mark as helpful if you find my contribution useful or as an answer if it does answer your question.That will encourage me - and others - to take time out to help you Check out my latest blog posts on http://exchangequery.com Thanks Sathish (MVP)

    Hi All 
    I managed to find the solution. Below command helped me in solving the issue 
    get-mailbox -ResultSize unlimited -IgnoreDefaultScope | search-mailbox -SearchQuery ‘Subject:"virus infected"’ -LogOnly -TargetMailbox administrator -TargetFolder filter -LogLevel Full
    get-mailbox -ResultSize unlimited -IgnoreDefaultScope | search-mailbox -SearchQuery ‘Subject:"virus infected"’ -TargetMailbox administrator -TargetFolder filter -deletecontent -LogLevel Full
    Remember to mark as helpful if you find my contribution useful or as an answer if it does answer your question.That will encourage me - and others - to take time out to help you Check out my latest blog posts on http://exchangequery.com Thanks Sathish
    (MVP)

  • Exchange Server 2013 OAB Web Distribution Configuration in Exchange 2010 & 2013 Coexistence.

    Hi,
    We have OAB Issue for Exchange 2010 Users in our Organization.
    We have Exchange 2010 and Exchange 2013 Coexistence.While Checking in Exchange Server 2010 Server OAB properties in Org Configuration--> Mailbox-->OAB Properties -->Distribution we are not seeing any CAS servers and Its Grayed Out.
    Please let us know How to add Exchange 2010 CAS in Exchange 2013 Web distribution.

    They made alot changes with the OAB in Exchange 2013, and it doesn't really function in the same manner as it did in 2010.  It might be best to take a look at the following blog posts from the Exchange Team, they should give you a better understanding
    on how it works and how to manage it going forward.
    http://blogs.technet.com/b/exchange/archive/2012/10/26/oab-in-exchange-server-2013.aspx
    http://blogs.technet.com/b/exchange/archive/2013/01/14/managing-oab-in-exchange-server-2013.aspx
    Please remember to click “Mark as Answer” on the post that helps you, and to click “Unmark as Answer” if a marked post does not actually answer your question. This can be beneficial to other community members reading the thread

  • Exchange 2010/2013 coexistence published in TMG 2010

    Environment:
    Two Windows 2008 R2, Exchange 2010 SP3 servers, currently holding all mailboxes
    Two Windows 2012 R2, Exchange 2013 SP1 servers, setup in progress
    Two Windows 2008 R2, TMG 2010, V7.0.9193.540 publishing both Exchange 2010 servers.
    Scenario:
    I need to continue having Exchange 2010 setup in TMG as is as the mailbox migration to 2013 will take weeks if not months and I have a project requirement to have Exchange Database Availability Group (DAG) functionality for all mailboxes throughout the project,
    so 4 servers are an absolute must. So I need to add Exchange 2013 in TMG and not just replace the 2010 setup with the 2013 setup and I cannot run one 2010 and one 2013 server. 
    Questions:
    1. I currently only have 2 public IP addresses available to SMTP, mapped to the external interfaces of TMG, to allow my environment to be able receive emails on 4 Exchange servers (two 2010 and two 2013) I need to have 4 public IP addresses, is that correct?
    2. Does anyone have a good general guide/blog for doing this (setting up Exchange 2013 in TMG in a coexistance scenario)? 
    This is nice, but doesn't really approach it from a coexistance scenario:
    http://blogs.technet.com/b/exchange/archive/2012/11/21/publishing-exchange-server-2013-using-tmg.aspx
    Thanks!

    Hi Trana,
    In TMG you can use single IP address to publish multiple Web address and below are the options which you can explore.
    Hope your OWA ECP etc are Https
    You need a SSL certificate which has all the URL SAN entry of both old and new Exchange server.
    Create a listener and select the IP address (Say public IP address 195.219.x.x)
    Link the SSL certificate
    Public DNS entry
     A record , Single IP
    195.219.x.x 
    Point to           
    Owa1.exchange1.com   - Old Server
    195.219.x.x 
    Point to           
    ECP1.exchange1.com     - Old Server
    195.219.x.x 
    Point to           
    ECP2.exchange2.com      - New Server
    195.219.x.x 
    Point to           
    Owa2.exchange2.com     - New Server
    Create a Web publishing rule as below
    Old server Exchange 1
    Owa1.exchange1.com  
    ECP1.exchange1.com    
    One Web publishing Rule with all the URL added on it and link the Rule with the listener we created
    Point the Web publishing to Exchange1.com server which is old
    New server Exchange 2
     Web publishing Rule with all the URL added on it and link the Rule with the listener we created
    Point the Web publishing to Exchange2.com server which is New
    ECP2.exchange2.com     
    Owa2.exchange2.com    

  • Exchange 2010 - 2013 Coexistence Issues

    I am migrating from Exchange 2010 to Exchange 2013, the Exchange 2013 is built in a different Geo-location site with its dedicated domain controllers in the new site. I have confirmed the mail flow between Exchange 2010 and 2013 mailboxes. I am able to discover
    Exchange 2010 servers from 2013 environment via Get-ExchangeServer shell command. However, I am not to discover Exchange 2013 servers from 2010 environment. 
    I need to configure Outlook Anywhere and Service Connection Point (Autodiscover) on Exchange 2010 to accept connections from Exchange 2013 servers. 
    Any suggestions would be much appreciated, thanks!

    Hi ,
    Please have a look in to the below mentioned blog after reading that blog i came to know few things .
    I am not sure ,i thought exchange 2013 servers will not be displayed in exchange 2010 management shell.
    Better and advisable method is to configure your exchange 2010 and 2013 servers via EAC or Shell in exchange 2013.
    http://exchangeserverpro.com/exchange-server-2010-2013-migration-managing-co-existence-environment/
    Taken from the above blog :
    You can’t use the Exchange 2010 EMC to manage Exchange 2013 objects and servers. While customers upgrade to Exchange 2013, we encourage them to use the EAC to:
    Manage Exchange 2013 mailboxes, servers, and corresponding services.
    View and update Exchange 2010 mailboxes and properties.
    View and update Exchange 2007 mailboxes and properties.
    We encourage customers to use Exchange 2010 EMC to create Exchange 2010 mailboxes.
    We encourage customers to use Exchange 2007 EMC to create Exchange 2007 mailboxes.
    Customers can continue to perform management tasks using the Exchange Management Shell and script tasks.
    Regards
    S.Nithyanandham
    Thanks S.Nithyanandham

  • Exchange 2010 & 2013 coexistence mail flow between servers

    Hi Everyone,
    I have an exchange 2010 server which I am trying to move away from. I have installed 2013 and it seems to be working well. I have successfully moved a mailbox over to 2013 without any issues.
    The problem i have at the moment is that a user who has their mailbox on the 2010 server can send to the user on the 2013 server. However the 2013 user cannot reply.
    Any ideas?

    Yes, some issues with client connectivity are related to Outlook.
    Exchange Blog:
    www.ntweekly.com
    MCSA, MCSE, MCITP:SA, MCITP:EA, MCITP:Enterprise Messaging Administrator 2010,MCTS:Virtualization

  • External emails not received after shutdown of Exchange 2010 in coexistence with Exchange 2013

    I have exchange 2013 and exchange 2010 in coexistence mode. All mailboxes have been moved to Exchange 2013 and firewall/spamfilters already pointed to Exchange 2013 CAS server. I can receive/send from and to external addresses, however when I shutted down
    the Exchange 2010 all incoming external mails were not received. What could be the cause?

    Start by re-checking how the device that takes the traffic from the external MX IP to internal is configured.
    Sniff the traffic to ensure that it is hitting 2013 directly.
    Cheers,
    Rhoderick
    Microsoft Senior Exchange PFE
    Blog:
    http://blogs.technet.com/rmilne 
    Twitter:   LinkedIn:
      Facebook:
      XING:
    Note: Posts are provided “AS IS” without warranty of any kind, either expressed or implied, including but not limited to the implied warranties of merchantability and/or fitness for a particular purpose.

  • Exchange UM 2010 Missed Call Notifications removes extensions

    We have integration of Lync Server 2010 and UM 2010. Our internal users don't have a DID, just extensions off our main number. When a user is enabled for UM, they get a missed call notification from UM. The trouble is, telephone number is displayed correctly,
    with extension but the link behind it strips the extension. For example it shows work number 222-333-4444 x4422 but if you hover the mouse over it, the actual link reads tel: 2223334444 which is the main number.
    If I disable UM for this user, then Lync gets to send the missed call notification, and in this case the link reads tel:+12223334444;ext=4422  and when a user clicks on it, the Lync client dials the extension vs the main number.
    MS Support tells me this is by design. Is there a way to configure this to where UM will pass the extensions in the link.

    Is there at least a way to hide the "Work:" field or make it non-clickable, so users are not sent to the wrong place?

  • Customize Missed Call Notifications

    Is it possible to customize missed call notifications (Exchange 2010 SP3) so as to exclude the callers email address?
    Sample default message -
    You missed a call from Joe Blogs at 55999
    Caller-Id:     55999
    Work:         +15599995555
    E-mail:         "joe.blogs.smtp.address" is inserted here
    How we'd like it to appear  -
    You missed a call from Joe Blogs at 55999
    Caller-Id:      55999
    Work:           +15599995555

    No, it is not possible with Exchange UM.
    Only way is to customize Lync and to use a own missed call notification wit a ucwa application.
    regards Holger Technical Specialist UC

  • Questions in Lync missed call notifications.

    Hello Experts,
    We have the following environment:
    Environment
    Currently there are no exchange UM’s in place.
    Has PBX to route the Enterprise calls.
    Missed call Behaviour
    When Lync receives the call, based on the calling number trunk translation rules the number is normalised and is presented with the missed call notification and Callee names will not be shown.
    What we are seeing here is a mixture, that when we get a call from the PBX, RNL is successful and I get the caller's picture, Name and E.164 number in the notification window for new call. But for the actual missed call notification,
    we only get the name (no number).
    Hence wanted to understand Lync missed call notification generation logic (where does it get the name from [RNL], which number does it show [called or AD], does it show the number etc ? ) as we are seeing mixed results with and without
    phone numbers or Names.
    Please advise. Thank in advance.

    Hi SBHV,
    Lync Server and Exchange Unified Messaging server are responsible to initiate a missed call notification. Lync Server generates a missed call notification by sending a SIP INFO message to Exchange unified messaging server, which in turn
    performs a reverse number lookup of the caller and sends email to the callee with the missed call details.
    During this reverse number lookup, if the incoming number is associated with any user or contact object on server (Exchange UM, Active Directory) or recipients personal contacts,
    it will be mapped with the caller or object name. If no match is found, just display the caller’s phone number or name. 
    Best regards,
    Eric.

  • How do I get my missed call notification to show in the notification center? Everything is turned on but nothing shows up.

    I previously posted a question about not being able to see any of my missed calls in the notification center. I have the iPhone 4S running on 6.1.1. The notifications previously stopped working but somehow the calls started to show up. (I can't remember what I did to make them show up). However, after I went to General>Reset>Reset All Settings , the missed call notifications disappeared again. I have tried turning everything on and it still does not work. My settings are Phone> Show 10 Recent Items> Banners > Badge Icon On> View In Lockscreen On. I have also tried to set it as alerts but nothing happens. The only way I can view my missed calls is on the lock screen and in the recents tab in the phone app. They do not show up in the notification center at all. Can someone please help me?

    Hi Jai_CaMille,
    Thanks for visiting Apple Support Communities.
    The steps in our iPhone troubleshooting assistant can help if you're not receiving notifications as expected:
    iPhone Assistant
    http://www.apple.com/support/iphone/troubleshooting/
    Cheers,
    Jeremy

  • Exchange 2010 - 2003 coexistence "unable to relay"

    Hi
    I have a customer with a Exchange 2010 / 2003 coexistence. 
    The Exchange 2010 has 3 CAS/HT servers. 
    When sending mails from 2003 to the outside world, one of the CAS/HT is giving me "unable to relay".
    Right now I have removed it from the routing group connector, but do you have any ideas where to look?
    BR
    Steen

    Hello,
    If there is only AD site, the receive connector is not needed.
    If there are multiple AD sites, when you send message to other AD sites, the receive conenctor is needed. If you send message from exchange 2003 to exchange 2010 or exchange 2010 to exchange 2003, the routing group connector is needed.
    Cara Chen
    TechNet Community Support

  • Exchange 2010-2013 co-existence - need for OWA/ActiveSync legacy namespace?

    Hi all
    Straight to the point: how to I update units that were set up manually with Exchange ActiveSync (pointing to owa.domain.com) with a temporary legacy namespace owa-legacy.domain.com, and then back to owa.domain.com?
    Background: I did a test run of migrating a single-server installation from Exchange 2010 to Exchange 2013. As expected, after moving a user's mailbox to the new Exchange 2013 CAS with owa.domain.com still pointing to Exchange 2010, the user
    was unable to log in at the Exchange 2010 OWA, and the ActiveSync unit was unable to fetch mail.
    So I created a legacy namespace (owa-legacy.domain.com) and set this as the URL on the Exchange 2010 server, and waited for it to populate, then switched owa.domain.com to Exchange 2013. But the URL on ActiveSync units was still pointing to the wrong URL.
    What did I overlook or not understand, or am I making migration more complex than needed?
    Thanks for reading and best regards
    /Maurice
    PS: here were some of my pre-post readings:
    Exchange 2003-2013 co-existence, even better
    Exchange 2003-2013 co-existence,
    Exchange 2010-2013 co-existence slides,
    Upgrading ActiveSync to Exchange 2010,

    Hi
    Is that because External URL on Internet facing CAS servers were set to Blank,and Users are not able to get Updated URL
    Please try to Add the External URL and made sure that all the required configurations are set Appropriately.
    Also I suggest posting on Exchange ActiveSync Forum as well
    http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/home?forum=exchangesvrmobility
    Cheers
    If you have any feedback on our support, please click
    here
    Zi Feng
    TechNet Community Support

Maybe you are looking for

  • [svn:fx-trunk] 5558: Add hack to Grammar. jj to allow special component tags in spark and halo namespaces to resolve to special node in the parser .

    Revision: 5558 Author: [email protected] Date: 2009-03-25 14:50:18 -0700 (Wed, 25 Mar 2009) Log Message: Add hack to Grammar.jj to allow special component tags in spark and halo namespaces to resolve to special node in the parser. This will be re-add

  • Help to solve this simple problem- please

    Hi ! Is there any method to resolve this problem. In my db there are 2 tables called Employee and Insurance. There fields as follows. Employee(empno,name,age,address,phone) Insurance(empno,insurName,insurCompany) Now I want to do this.In my HTML form

  • DVD won't play in ordinary player

    Hi, I'm quite new to the whole process of creating DVDs, so I tried using iDVD but it's a terrible program so Iäm trying to use DVD Studio Pro without knowing much about it. I've burned a DVD using it and it won't play on an ordinary player. It simul

  • How do i create a group

    How do I create a group?  I would like to a create for my wife's contacts and a group for my contacts so that I can tell iTunes to only synch her contacts to her phone and only my contacts to my phone.

  • Print dialog poping up for WF-BATCH

    Within my background task method, I do BDC on tcode IMA2N to add measures to an existing Appropriation request.This works perfectly when I execute the object method from SWO1. But when this method is called from workflow it throws an error u201CNo ba