Missing attachments for some users in Outlook 2010

Hi, 
We have a single Exchange 2010 (sp3 rollups 2 and 4 installed) with clients on Outlook 2010. 
4 users received an email from outside the domain with 12 attachments (8 PDF, 4 excel and word). Email content type is multipart/mixed. 
One user can see all 12 attachments in outlook while the other 3 can only see the 8 PDF's. All users can see all attachments in OWA. Email size limits and attachment limits dont seem to be the cause. 
I've had a look in the forums and I cant see anything related to our exact issue (affecting some but not all users, content type seems ok). 
Looks to me like I should start with a pipeline trace, but does anyone have any other suggestions? 
Cheers, 
Scott 

Hi,
To understand more about the issue, I’d like to ask the following questions:
Does the problematic users can view other Excel and Word attachments? Try to send another email with single excel and word attachment to have a test.
Are the problematic attachment visible if you forward the email to other users through Outlook?
Additionally, pipeline tracing log is recommended to troubleshoot the issue and find the root cause.
If you have any question, please feel free to let me know.
Thanks,
Angela Shi
TechNet Community Support

Similar Messages

  • How to delete existing e-mail signature for all users in outlook 2010

    Dears,
    How to delete existing (or reset to none ) e-mail signature for all users .
    If anyone knows where I can find this script or another way of accomplishing this I would be very thankful.
    outlook Version : 2010
    PS : Not to disable.
    Khaja Hameed

    If you want to manage signatures for multiple users your best bet is to use Group Policy.
    See:
    Setting up a Corporate Signature | HowTo-Outlook
    http://www.howto-outlook.com/howto/corporatesignatures.htm
    <p>Eric Legault (<a href="https:/mvp.support.microsoft.com/default.aspx/profile/legault">MVP: Outlook</a>)<br/> <a href="http://about.me/ericmlegault">About me...</a><br/> <a href="http://www.outlookappins.com/products/social-contacts">Outlook
    Appins</a>: Store Social Media fields in your Outlook Contacts!</p>

  • Is it possible to add a button to the right-click context menu for a user in Outlook 2010 using VBA?

    I've tried many things and read up quite a bit but I cannot figure this out.
    I cannot create an add-in so I have to use VBA.
    I want to add a a button to the right-click context menu when I right-click on a user. Is this possible?

    Hello,
    Yes, it is possible to customize the context menu in Outlook. See
    Customizing Context Menus in Office 2010 for more information.
    But VBA doesn't allow to customize the Fluent UI in Outlook, you need to develop an add-in instead.

  • No Free/Busy Information for Exchange 2010 users in Outlook 2010 client, 2010 OWA shows this information fine

    I have looked for hours and hours on Google and this web site for this type of issue and nothing seems to help.
    Problem:
    On my new Windows 2008 R2 /Exchange 2010 server with IIS7 installed, I can use Outlook 2010 client to login and send and receive e-mail but when I try to busy search internal Exchange users I get no information (cross-hatch), but the sender of the Meeting Request
    can see their own free/busy information fine.  And OWA users can see free/busy information fine, as can Outlook 2003 client users against this Exchange 2010 server when logged in.
    I don't know if I have a certificate problem with regard to IIS7 or Exchange 2010, I did not create my own certificate , it is just what was installed by default when I installed and configured Win2K8 server, IIS7 and Exchange.
    On the Windows 7 workstations with Outlook 2010 client, I am not logging into the Exchange 2010 server DNS domain, if that makes any difference.  On these workstations I can ping "autodiscover.my.exchange.server.com" and my.exchange.server.com
    with no problem.  I even used this Microsoft KB to install a new _autodiscover dns entry, but it did not help :
    When I turn on logging on my Outlook 2010 client, I see this in my C:\Users\Administrator\AppData\Local\Temp\1\outlook logging\20131208-135658864-fb.log :
    2013/12/08 13:56:58.864: Getting ASURL
    2013/12/08 13:56:58.864: URL returned from cached autodiscover: blah blah 
    2013/12/08 13:56:58.864: Request to URL: 
    2013/12/08 13:56:58.864: Request action: 
    2013/12/08 13:56:58.864: Request XML: <?xml version="1.0"?>
    2013/12/08 13:56:59.051: Request sent
    2013/12/08 13:56:59.051: Response error code: 00000000
    2013/12/08 13:56:59.051: HTTP status code: 0
    2013/12/08 13:56:59.051: -------------------------------
    2013/12/08 13:56:59.051: There is an error in request/response.
    2013/12/08 13:56:59.051: XML response:
    2013/12/08 13:56:59.051: -------------------------------
    2013/12/08 13:56:59.051: Getting ASURL
    2013/12/08 13:56:59.644: Failed to get ASURL. Error 8004010F
    At an Exchange shell console I enter this command and get these results :
    Exchnage Management Shell :
    VERBOSE: Connecting to BPExchange2010.my.exchange.server.com
    VERBOSE: Connected to BPExchange2010.my.exchange.server.com.
    [PS] C:\Windows\system32>Test-OutlookWebServices -id:[email protected] -TargetAddress:[email protected]
    ll.com
    RunspaceId : c929eacd-d53c-49d7-8532-c4b74e61b8be
    Id         : 1019
    Type       : Information
    Message    : A valid Autodiscover service connection point was found. The Autodiscover URL on this object is 
    Type       : Success
    Message    : [Server] Successfully contacted the UM service at https://bpexchange2010.my.exchange.server.com/ews/exchan
                 ge.asmx. The elapsed time was 234 milliseconds.
    [PS] C:\Windows\system32>
    ** Also frequently when I log into Outlook 2010 client and start to send a meeting request , I get the Security Alert dialog :
    autodiscover.my.exchange.server.com
    Information you exchange with this site cannot be viewed or changed by others.  However, there is a problem with the site's security certificate.
    Green Check Mark :  The security cerficate is from a trusted certifying authority
    Green Check Mark: The security certificate date is valid
    Red X :  The name on the security certificate is invalid or does not match the name of the site.
    Do you want to proceed ?  .  I either import the certificate or click YES, but does not help this issue.
    NOTE: Each user that shows as NO INFORMATION cross-hatch, these users have appointments and have logged into outlook before.
    When I do this autodiscover url from a Windows 7 pc with outlook 2010 I get  :
    This XML file does not appear to have any style information associated with it. The document tree is shown below.
    <Autodiscover xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/exchange/autodiscover/responseschema/2006">
    <Response>
    <Error Time="14:47:01.5656198" Id="401440650">
    <ErrorCode>600</ErrorCode>
    <Message>Invalid Request</Message>
    <DebugData/>
    </Error>
    </Response>
    </Autodiscover>
    Can anyone assist ?  What am I missing ?
    Thank You
    NOTE:  When will this go away.  I had to strip out a lot of helpful information to post this.  "Body text cannot contain images or links until we are able to verify your account."

    Hi,
    How many users encounter this issue, all users with Outlook 2010 or some specific users?
    According to your post, the Error code 600 indicates that your Autodiscover service is working well. as for the certificate mismatch issue, we can also following the KB below to resolve it:
    http://support.microsoft.com/kb/940726/en-us
    The Free/Busy information in Exchange 2010 is using the Availability service to
    retrieve it. Please directly access
    https://mail.mydomain.ae/EWS/Exchange.asmx in IE and see whether a proper XML file is returned.
     Or we can go to
    https://testexchangeconnectivity.com and check MS Exchange Web Services Connectivity Tests.
    Thanks,
    Winnie Liang
    TechNet Community Support

  • Outlook Anywhere not working for some users

    Hi All,
    I am having a strange issue today with a customer -
    Outlook Anywhere has been enabled on their Exchange 2010 environment, but it doesn't work for some users.
    Using the ExRCA I have been able to identify the following error on the users who are unable to connect:
    "Testing the MAPI Mail Store endpoint on the Exchange server."
    "Attempting to log on to the mailbox"
    Mailbox logon returned ecLoginPerm 1010. You don't have the correct permissions to log in to the mailbox.
    EMSMDB Status: ecLoginPerm 1010
    Elapsed Time: 225 ms.
    On users that are able to connect it goes through the ExRCA without any issues.
    Any help would be much appreciated.
    Cheers,
    Jack
    Testing the MAPI Mail Store endpoint on the Exchange server.
    An error occurred while testing the Mail Store.
    Additional Details
    Elapsed Time: 333 ms.
    Test Steps
    Attempting to ping the MAPI Mail Store endpoint with identity: outlook.mg.com:6001.
    The endpoint was pinged successfully.
    Additional Details
    Attempting to log on to the Mailbox.
    An error occurred while logging on to the Mailbox.
    Additional Details
    Mailbox logon returned ecLoginPerm 1010. You don't have the correct permissions to log in to the mailbox.
    EMSMDB Status: ecLoginPerm 1010
    Elapsed Time: 225 ms.

    Hi,
    I notice that this issue only impact "some users".
    I suggest double confirm whether the Outlook Anywhere configuration set correctly on Outlook client. Pic as blow:
    Thanks
    Mavis Huang
    TechNet Community Support

  • Increasing Email Size Limits for some users

    Hi All,
    For some users (management) i needed to arrange that they are able to send bigger files then the default 10MB limit to each other.
    I used this procedure to do so,
    https://www.simple-talk.com/sysadmin/exchange/increasing-email-size-limits-for-your-high-profile-users-in-exchange-2010/
    In a nutshell:
    Set Global Transport Org. Config to 200MB
    Set Transport Send and Receive connector to 200MB
    Created a Distribution group adding the MT members and me (for testing)
    Created a transport Rule for the 10MB limit for all users and exception for the distribution group
    (Believe me, i am not happy with the 200MB size limit)
    All seems to work but i have one issue that i cannot tackel or maybe it is by design.
    -Managemant can also send big files to all
    users who do not have this privelige, this is not someting i want, sending 100MB+ attachments to over 150 users.
    Is this by design or do i mis something?
    Thanks,
    Ron

    Hi RonGielgens,
    Attachment size in exchange has to be set on
    Global settings
    Connectors (send and receive connectors)
    Mailbox
    The global settings will affect all the others. of course connectors will affect specific servers and mailbox one user. You have to set the global to the absolute max size you want to allow in your organization.
    after you do this you will need either to set the 10MB on each mailbox
    Get-Mailbox | Set-Mailbox -MaxSendSize 10MB -MaxReceiveSize 10MB
    Then change the limit on specific mailbox
    or another way is to create a transport rule that will reject the email if the attachment size it > 10MB unless the sender/recipient is the required user or group.
    so basically create 2 transport rules
    1. reject messages sent to anyone with attachment > 10mb unless the recipient is userX
    2. reject messages sent from anyone with attachment > 10mb unless the sender is userX
    Normal case it should not allow.
    Thanks, MAS
    Please mark as helpful if you find my comment helpful or as an answer if it does answer your question. That will encourage me - and others - to take time out to help you.

  • Sharepoint Foundation - search working for some users (or computers), but not others

    Hi all,
    We have doozy of a search problem with SharePoint Foundation 2010 that I'm hoping someone can help with.
    We have an application that is listening on port 14197 and search is working just fine, but only for one or two users.
    If I do a search while logged in using the account we set the application up with then the search works fine and it returns records as expected.
    If I use a different account - one that has full control over the app, then the exact same search fails with the following message:
    We did not find any results for 06BSL.
    Suggestions:
    Ensure words are spelled correctly.
    Try using synonyms or related searches.
    Try broadening your search by searching from a different site.
    Additional resources:
    Get additional search tips by visiting Search Help
    If you cannot find a page that you know exists, contact your administrator.
    We've done everything we can think of, including several procedures to create new search accounts, replace databases, etc.
    Nothing has helped and all of the info we can find online is in relation to getting search working when it doesn't work at all.  In our case it is working, but only for some users.  We thought it might have been a permissions issue, but not matter
    what permissions we seem to give to test accounts they still don't work.  We've set up a test account, for example, that is a member of the 'application owners' group, but cannot produce any search results with it.
    The SharePoint Foundation server is running on Windows 2008 Server Foundation, with a separate SBS 2003 DC.  
    Any help most appreciated.

    Hi Alex, thanks for your response and apologies about the late reply - didn't realise someone had responded until now!
    Agreed that this looks like a permissions issue, but we're stumped as to what it could be.  The 'test' account displays this problem - if we try and search on 06BSL
    we get no results, but it does appear that this account has full control over this document (see below).
    Note that the 'Manage Permissions' page presents a comment 'This list item inherits permissions from its parent. (Customer QA & Product Management)' which is what we're
    expecting.
    The indexing schedule is set to 5 minutes. 
    Appreciate your help with this, as we've spent a huge amount of time on this problem but don't seem to be any closer to a resolution.
    Cheers,
    Damian
    Check permissions result (this result is the same for the list or for the document itself):
    Permission levels given to test (DOMAIN\test)
    Full Control
    Given through the "QA Application Owners" group.
    Design, Contribute, Read
    Given through the "QA Application Members" group. 

  • Deactivate Attachment List in ME22N for some users

    Hi,
    we are adding some documents for the standard PO in ME22N. Our director's command is :
    These attachments can't be seen to some of users. So for some users I have to deactivate the Attachmnent List menu button in ME22N. How can I do it?

    Is there any other way? Can I use a BADI and which and how? I study classes CL_GOS_MANAGER and CL_EX_ME_PROCESS_PO_CUST with some their methods. But I can't find th exact solution to my problem.

  • Outlook is unable to connect to the proxy server.(Error Code 10) when users opened Outlook 2010

    Hi All
    Exchange Server - 2013 CU2 (Windows 2012 Standard)
    AD Server - 2003 R2 SP2
    exchange-svr01.domain.com - internal name
    mail.company.net - external name
    When users opened Outlook 2010, they will encountered
    "There is a problem with the proxy server's security certificate. The name on the security certificate is invalid or does not match the name of the target site exchange-svr01.domain.com.
    Outlook is unable to connect to the proxy server.(Error Code 10)"
    I also used the Microsoft Remote Connectivity Analyzer to test RPC/HTTP connectivity.
    The RPC/HTTP test completed successfully.
        Validating the certificate name.
         Certificate name validation failed.
         Host name company.net doesn't match any name found on the server certificate CN=AMAZONA-U59HG9G.
    Testing SSL mutual authentication with the RPC proxy server.
         The test passed with some warnings encountered.
    The certificate common name company.net doesn't match the mutual authentication string provided mail.company.net; however, a match was found in the subject alternative name extension.
     please help.

    Hi PS CL
    [PS] C:\Windows\system32>Get-OutlookAnywhere
    RunspaceId                         : c457e8aa-a0f3-4a0f-aa02-9eff24d02821
    ServerName                         : exchange-svr01
    SSLOffloading                      : True
    ExternalHostname                   : mail.company.net
    InternalHostname                   : exchange-svr01.domain.com
    ExternalClientAuthenticationMethod : Negotiate
    InternalClientAuthenticationMethod : Ntlm
    IISAuthenticationMethods           : {Basic, Ntlm, Negotiate}
    XropUrl                            :
    ExternalClientsRequireSsl          : True
    InternalClientsRequireSsl          : True
    MetabasePath                       : IIS://exchange-svr01.domain.COM/W3SVC/1/ROOT/Rpc
    Path                               : C:\Program Files\Microsoft\Exchange Server\V15\FrontEnd\HttpProxy\rpc
    ExtendedProtectionTokenChecking    : None
    ExtendedProtectionFlags            : {}
    ExtendedProtectionSPNList          : {}
    AdminDisplayVersion                : Version 15.0 (Build 712.22)
    Server                             : exchange-svr01
    AdminDisplayName                   :
    ExchangeVersion                    : 0.20 (15.0.0.0)
    Name                               : Rpc (Default Web Site)
    DistinguishedName                  : CN=Rpc (Default Web
                                         Site),CN=HTTP,CN=Protocols,CN=exchange-svr01,CN=Servers,CN=Exchange
    Administrative
                                         Group (FYDIBOHF23SPDLT),CN=Administrative
    Groups,CN=domain,CN=Microsoft
                                         Exchange,CN=Services,CN=Configuration,DC=domain,DC=COM
    Identity                           : exchange-svr01\Rpc (Default Web Site)
    Guid                               : 33c3cb74-e490-487d-844c-4072334089a1
    ObjectCategory                     : domain.COM/Configuration/Schema/ms-Exch-Rpc-Http-Virtual-Directory
    ObjectClass                        : {top, msExchVirtualDirectory, msExchRpcHttpVirtualDirectory}
    WhenChanged                        : 8/17/2013 10:14:55 AM
    WhenCreated                        : 6/25/2013 1:47:50 PM
    WhenChangedUTC                     : 8/17/2013 2:14:55 AM
    WhenCreatedUTC                     : 6/25/2013 5:47:50 AM
    OrganizationId                     :
    OriginatingServer                  : ADserver.domain.COM
    IsValid                            : True
    ObjectState                        : Changed

  • Workitem exists in SAP Inbox But does not appear in UWL for some users

    Hi,
    We have a peculiar problem with a standard workflow. This workflow is working fine in SAP Inbox and UWL in portal for most of the users. But sometimes, it does not send workitem to UWL for some users.
    Any input of as why this happens?

    Hi All,
    I had experienced this type of problem as well, just to share it could be that the Identity of the Portal user misses a role which can be solved by any user assigning the identity in their identity management or it could also be the connection status of the UWL to the backend, there should be at least two connection statuses for workflow items to get into the UWL I could not recall it but I would post it here once I have the access to our system again.
    Cheers,

  • Taking long time on First login for some users

    Dears,
    We are facing very strange issue in our ECC6 server.
    For some users when they login put userid and password it takes 15-20 min to login and sometimes give time out.
    but after first login it works fine.
    If I remove roles from those user and assign them SAP_ALL or one or two roles,they also work fine.
    One more thing some other users having same authorization are working fine.
    One solution of this issue I found to delete the user having problem and copy it with user who is working fine.
    But not getting root cause of the issue and permanent solution of the issue.
    Please suggest.
    Shivam

    We just experienced the same problem after updating our SP-Stack.
    <p>Some users were experiencing a long logon time, and a long time to return to the Session Manager screen.  Changing to the SAP Menu instead of the User Menu cleared the problem for those users, but they no longer had quick access to transactions that were in the User Menu, and not in the Favourites.
    <p>Note 203617 was not the answer for our problem, but it did point us in the right direction.
    <p>After upgrading our SP Stack last Friday, it appeared that some of the roles in the Customer Namespace (ie, zRoleName001) had inherited a copy of the Logistics or Accounting SAP menu trees.  This meant that users with those roles ended up with a User Menu which contained the 10 or so transactions that are assigned to their roles, and additionally,  the entire Logistics or Accounting Tree which contain 35,000+ items.  In transaction SM66, users who are waiting for their logon to complete are shown doing a sequential read of table AGR_HIERT.
    <p>To correct this, I removed the Logistics and Accounting menu trees as appropriate from the User menu of those roles in PFCG.  Users that use the User Menu can now logon normally.
    <p>This is what I did to troubleshoot:
    <p>* Pick one user that is experiencing long login times, and have them change to the SAP Menu instead of the User Menu.  If their logon time improves, open transaction SE38, and run the program EASY_ACCESS_NUMBER_OF_NODES.
    <p>* Specify the user's account and click on Execute.
    <p>* If the program times out, chances are that they have an enormous number of items in their User Menu - continue with the next step.
    <p>* If the program finishes, look at the number of Menu Nodes for that user - Note 203617 says that a User Menu with 1000 or more items is considered "large" and will degrade logon performace as the User Menu buffer is constantly swapping in and out.
    <p>* Note each of their each of the user's roles from SU01, then check the Menu tab for each of those roles in PFCG to see if any roles are adding large sections of the SAP menu.
    <p>* If necessary, maintain the Role's Menu items in DEV, and transport to TEST, then Production.  BE CAREFUL to ensure that the Users list is not modified when transporting the changes into Production, or the Role will become de-assigned from your Production users, and your users will hate you when they become unauthorised to open transactions.
    <p>* Once the User Menu is back to normal, the user can change back to the User Menu and everyone should be able to logon normally.
    <p>Hope this helps.
    Edited by: Chris Pope on Apr 21, 2010 1:09 PM

  • Adobe Premiere Pro CC launches for some users, but crashes for others.

    I am troubleshooting an issue in a college computer lab. Adobe Premiere Pro CC launches perfectly for some users, but crashes for others. All computers are joined to a domain. The program launches successfully under faculty and admin accounts. It launches under my student account and will launch for some students in the class. There are, however, some students who cannot get the program to launch. Each time it fails when attempting to load ImporterQuickTime.prm.
    For these students, the following error appears:
    Adobe Premiere Pro CC has stopped working
    Check Online for a solution and close the program (Tried this nothing seems to come of it)
    Close the program
    I clicked View problem details
    Problem Event Name: APPCRASH
    Application Name: Adobe Premiere Pro.exe
    Application Version: 7.2.2.33
    Application Timestamp: 532c3999
    Fault Module Name: dvaui.dll
    Fault Module Version: 7.2.2.33
    Fault Module Timestamp: 532bed86
    Exception Code: c0000005
    Exception Offset: 00000000002d31c1
    OS Version: 6.1.7601.2.1.0.256.48
    Locale ID: 1033
    Additional Information 1: 3272
    Additional Information 2: 32722596c6b4441ac0840ed9743cbfbb
    Additional Information 3: 3e22
      Additional Information 4: 3e2260f0a53760c20f23c7e2675c1736
    I did check Quicktime and it is not updated to the most recent version. However, if it was a result of Quicktime not being up to date, why can some accounts launch the program while others cannot. I have also updated the graphics driver on one computer. No change. I compared my student Active Directory account to that of one student who could not launch the program. They are in exactly the same place in AD and therefore have the same permissions on the domain. This is a puzzling issue and the instructor is getting frustrated. Any help or suggestions with this matter would be greatly appreciated.
    -Barb

    I have no idea, other than what I said about the program's design requirement for an Admin account and "sometimes" problems on any other account
    About the only thing I can suggest is a "remote control" chat session... when a student with a non-working account is having problems
    Creative Cloud chat support (all Creative Cloud customer service issues)
    http://helpx.adobe.com/x-productkb/global/service-ccm.html

  • Jabber voice mail for some users.

    Dears,
    J4W voicemail works perfect with default config.xml file for some of the users and for some of the users it shows the attached when clicked on voicemail tab. I have create 2 no's of sevice profile, the voice mail credential set  for both service profile is Unified CM IM and presence.
    I can understand the prompt as it is asking for voicemail password for that reason i have to create a custom config.xml file and i have to upload in TFTP server, But my concern is why it is working for some of the users without config.xml file and for some users it is prompting for username and password.
    Thanks

    Dears,
    the profile are different, but if i put the the other users working profile also it is not working.
    The voice mail server is showing not connected in jabber,
    Any hints.
    Thanks

  • Restrict the posting period opening and closing for some users

    Dear SAP gurus,
    I want to restrict some users to open the posting period and for some users close posting periods. I knew that these can be done through authorization group. Pls explain how to create authorization groups and how to use those?  Anybody can help me out?
    Regards,
    Venkata Reddy

    Dear Venkatareddy,
    There are two sets of period in OB52. The first set of "From" and "To" is for the authorised group and second set is for the non authorised group. In the "Authorisation Group" (last column) give some 4 charecters name. Say "FICO".
    Now ask the basis to attach the object "FICO" for the users who are authorised say user1, user 2 and user3.
    Now in the first set of period you can maintain say 1 2008 to 16 2008 and in the second set 1 2008 to 1 2008.
    So except user1,2 and 3, all the others can post only in 1 2008. Whereas users 1,2 and3 can post in all the periods of 2008.
    Assign points if useful
    regards
    Venkatesh

  • MAM application is not working for some users

    Hi All,
    Tha MAM application is not working for some users.Different users have different workcenters other than that I dont see any other change. When I run MAM30_090_GETLIST in the backend I can see the no of customized users.But I cant see same no of users in the MEREP_207 table for the Syncbo MAM30_090 and strcture id TOP in the middleware. There is a data when I checked under worklist monitor for that user. But neither the MAM application nor MAM data is downloading to that device.
    If I use different user on the same device I can see the MAM application and MAM data.
    What could be the wrong in this case. Any help would be highly appreciated.
    Mobile Client:MI 70 SP 15 Patch 0 Build 200802280918
    Middleware:SAP NetWeaver 2004s with Patch leve 15
    Backend:SAP ECC 6.0
    Application:MAM 3.0
    Thanks and Regards,
    Ameer.

    Hi,
    from your description the source of your issue is quite obvious: some of the MAM users configured in spro are not configured properly.
    For T01 SyncBos the number of TOP records in merep_207 MUST be the same as number of headers returned by an appropriate getList FM in the backend.
    You need to solve this before you can go any further.
    Reason why a record is not recorded in MEREP_207 - getdetail failed for whatever reason. So execute MAM30_ML_getdetail for each of the users that is not replicated in the middleware and check if there are errors in RETURN table. If there is no error - one of the common reason for replication fail is when there are records in item tables that have duplicate primary keys.
    Regards,
    Larissa Limarova

Maybe you are looking for

  • Laptop won't power on without AC adapter

    Hello, can someone help me?? I currently using dell inspiron 14R, 5437. I bought it last year and after 11 month using it, i found a major problem. At first my dell cannot charging up the battery, the notif tray says "pluged in not charging". So i us

  • Flah Lite Device Centre: content types

    Welcome everyone, my question is what is a difference between 'browser' content type and 'standalone player'. I found out that most Nokia phone types support standalone player but do not support browser content type. It is quite different in Sony-Eri

  • Maps will not work on any app

    Maps runs and displays a blank grid (including maps, find my iphone etc).  Maps tells me it cannot connect to the internet, but I am.  Connectivity is not an issue with any other app.  I have tried a soft reset a few times and have turned airplane mo

  • Lenovo - can we get an idea on timing for drivers for windows 7?

    I know the standard answer - soon after the final version ships. However, I also know that OEMs and Microsoft are working hard to make sure drivers are available at launch. So how about some love here and let us folks leaning into the wind test some

  • Drop shadow in all directions?

    I would like to make a drop shadow in all directions.. In the drop shadow dialog you can only make one in two directions, say south and east.... I have also tried copying the layer and making the ds in the opposite direction... but I would have to do