Missing authorization already filled in

Hi forum experts
im having a problem with some authotizations on the CO class.
despistes the values are filled in when we maintain in PFCG, when the user runs the tcode (KS13, KSBT), theres always the message "missing authorization". We run the SU53 the missing values are already filled in (Actvt, Kokrs, Kostl, Kstar).
all of the cost centers are active, and even when the fields have *, the su53 returns missing auths.
TY

TY - You can check the buffer of a particular user via SU56. The missing Auth object that is displayed in SU53 can be checked for its values in this tcode. Press F5 is you would like to check other users buffer .. Perform a user comparision and such things should get resolved. Hope it helps.
~Sri

Similar Messages

Missing authorizations in QAS for each n every t code

Hello All,
i have created one role in QAS adding tcodes to it when i tested it it is showing missing authorizations for every tcode when i see in su53 and i tried to assign manually in su24 also but it is saying no changes are permitted in this client so if create a new role in DEV and transport that role to QAS if so how can give me steps in detail as if iam new to security plz do help me.
Regards
upendar.D

he means on pfcg when role is designed and when generating profile, for object you already know you can assign what you want then for field that you don't understand what it is for leave it blank first. assign the role to the user. login as the user then try the transaction if it failed on authorization check go to su53 directly by using /nsu53, check what object is being error and what value expected by the transaction. edit and regenerate profile for the role again. try transaction again. repeat until success.
Christian Rose wrote:
Hello,
>
> just adding transaction to a role is not enough, within the role you have to go to tab "Authorizations", goto "Maintain Authorization Data and Generate Profiles" in change mode and generate the profiles via the according button.
>
> regards
>
> Christian
Edited by: Henry Hsu on Oct 13, 2011 12:12 PM

Master-Detail: create detail-row(s) with id already filled in

I have two tables with an one-to-many relationship (connected by 'id'). If you select a row from the master-table, you'll see the detail-table (with the various row's belonging to the master-record). Now I made a button which users can use to add additional rows to the detail-table. They get a form which they can fill in and submit, the only problem is... I don't want them to manualy fill in the id, this should be the only field that should already be filled in (or better should be invisible, but filled in). So they should select a master-row first and then click 'add' to add a detail-row(s) to it. But I have absolutely no clue how I can do this... I tried creating custom create methods in the view-object or entity-object... but the problem I keep running into is where to get the row-iterator... I have know idea if this is the right direction to look for, maybe somebody can give me some advice.
Thanks in advance...!

Steven, hope you can help me out once more...
I have the same problem with a different view object, I'll explain...
First of all I set jbo.locking.mode to 'optimistic', now the problem...
I have two entity objects (Mbrships and Mbrshiphistory) which are connected by a foreign key (created in the database) on MbrshipID. Mbrshipshistory is also connected to the Aff entity object by a foreign key on AffID. The idea is simple... there are affiliates and a couple of memberships. An affiliate has/had a membership, that's where the membershiphistory-table comes in, which stores AffID, MbrshipID, DateFrom, DateTo and some other values.
Now, what I created... JDeveloper created entity-objects of all the tables and made associations of the foreign keys. I created the following view objects: http://213.93.142.238/oracle/datamodel.jpg and application module: http://213.93.142.238/oracle/applicationmodule.jpg The (MemberToMembershipHistory) view link between Members and MembershipHostory is based upon the association between the two tables.
The following is a screenshot of my struts-config.xml: http://213.93.142.238/oracle/struts-config.jpg
Editing mbrshiphistories works fine, but I get the following error when I try to add one: oracle.jbo.InvalidOwnerException: JBO-25030: Failed to find or invalidate owning entity. I also don't see the AffID already filled in in the add/edit-screen (same problem as in the opening-post) when I try to add one. I double-checked everything, but I can't find the problem. Do you know what I do wrong...?

Missing Authorizations Scenario (SU53) in GRC AC 10

Hello Gurus,
Good evening !!
I was wondering how can GRC AC 10 system help when an end user has missing authorizations ??
General scenario is if an end user hits a transaction and gets "Not Authorized" , he will send a SU53 screenshot and depending on that the Basis/Security person will assign a role or directly add a transaction to his "Base/Default" roles.
I am unable to visualize , how can we handle this scenario of missing authorizations in CUP or BRM .
Please provide me your inputs on the same.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Victor

Hi Victor.
Am I correct in understanding that your concern is more about how the Security admin will determine which role/access to assign to the user given the SU53 report?
Personally, I would still use a report like SUIM within the local system to determine the correct role to assign to the user (if they should have it in the first place). Obviously ensure that the required roles are imported into the GRC system.
In summary, use your "As-is" process to identify what the authorization issue is, as well as the method for determining which role to provide to the user to resolve the issue, but the only thing that has changed is the "how to assign the access" i.e. you are not using SU01/PFCG as it would be hoped that you are using the GRC Access Request functinality to submit the role request/s.
I hope that has cleared up the initial misunderstanding I had.

'Document store operation failed due to missing authorization'

Hi all,
I am getting the error message 'Document store operation failed due to missing authorization' when trying to save the workbook as the existing Workbook after changing the structure for it. We are using the Authorization Hierarchies.
What is the problem and how can I fix it, PLEASE ???
Thanks.
Message was edited by: Venkat Kodi

check out the related thread:
What is this error

Missing authorization for the plant - Message no. ME303

Missing authorization for the plant - Message no. ME303
I am getting the above error while creating the PO.
what is the cause of error?
How do I rectify this?
I have used the right data, till yday it was working fine. I doubt some config change has happened

Hi,
Check with your basis consultant whether the authorization is change ?
Regards,
Chetan.

Missing authorization for plant ' '

User is missing authorization for plant ' '
User trace gives the following missing authorization
Object:
M_IS_WERKS RC=4 MCINF=S039;WERKS=' '
Can anybody help me out to find the meaning of space( ' ' ) in plant or any field?
thank you in advace

* Prüfung, ob Berechtigung für die Werke existiert
SELECT * FROM T001W INTO TABLE AW_HLP_T001W
                      WHERE WERKS IN AW_WERKS.
DESCRIBE TABLE AW_WERKS LINES SY-TFILL.
IF SY-TFILL > 0.
    FLG_SELECT = 'X'.
ENDIF.
<b> clear aw_hlp_t001w-werks.                       " note 124769, ver.04
collect aw_hlp_t001w.                           " note 124769, ver.04</b>
LOOP AT AW_HLP_T001W.
    AUTHORITY-CHECK OBJECT 'M_IS_WERKS'
             ID 'MCINF' FIELD AW_MCINF
             ID 'WERKS' FIELD AW_HLP_T001W-WERKS.
There must be a reason to add an empty line, which causes the silly authority check. As far as I understand Note 124769 you have got to add plant ' '. See Note 408003: ."Create an authorization for the authorization object M_IS_WERKS which contains the value WERK = . Refer to Note 124769."

EDMS: 'Missing authorization for this functionality' when searching user

Hi,
I've activated ALC authorization for DMS. In EDMS, when trying to add an user to a DIR with search function an error occurres as below.
'Missing authorization for this functionality'
BTW, the user has contains SAP_ALL profile. It can't be any authorization reasons.
Regards,
Yemi

Hi,
authorization checks will not happen if the search help from sap-gui.I
think the problem is releted to missing implementation of "check
function module" from your side. If the search help is linked to a
"master data table" (type A) a check function must be implemented to
check the permission of the user.
This function module is read from table BAPIF4T. Please
check the following link: http://help.sa
p.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/a5/3eca044ac011d189
4e0000e829fbbd/content.htm
http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/PLM/Object+Link+search+in+EasyDMS
Regards,
Hari

Troubleshooting missing Authorization.

Dear All,
One of the project member reported a problem that she could not upload a document to solution manager. I have verified su53 and it says that authorization check failed. Authorization object --> S_IWB (Knowledge warehouse)
Object class BC_C Basis -Development environment.
Can any body suggest how to start troubleshooting and adding missing authorization object please ?
Many Thanks,
Nick

Hi Nick,
Please go through the docs in help.sap.com.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/02/4af54075198431e10000000a1550b0/frameset.htm
Also what roles did you assign to the user. Please check if there are authorization objects related to uploading documents in Soultion Manager.
Please reward some points.
Regards,
Kiran.

Workbook: Document store operation failed due to missing authorization

Hello authorizer gurus,
I have got 3.5.
I have transported.
I try to open a workbook.
I am getting a Error Message:
Document store operation failed due to missing authorization
Newly saved Queries as workbook can be openend.
What's wrong ?
Thank You
Martin Sautter

Martin,
To get a detailed message about the error (including which authorization objects the user needs to have to be able to perform the action that caused the error) use ST22. It sounds like they are missing the Open authorization for workbooks.
Cheers,
Rusty

Patterns-how to browse them easily already filling in an area?

What's an easily way of browsing the patterns I currently have, but in a sense that they are already filled out on a large area so I can see the effect. So what I'm after is a way to ideally step through (single click) one pattern to the next, and see the effect it has as a pattern for a filled in area.
At the moment I see to have to keep going back to the Fill with Pattern for a given area and manally applying and then viewing. The only place I can find to see patterns is in the fill with pattern type dialog however (a) they are very small and (b) they are not tiled across an area so you can get a feel for what it will look like.
Thanks

Try using a Pattern fill layer and changing the presets in the properties panel.

Missing authorizations for authorization object UIU_COMP

I have generated the pfcg role for a business role using report CRMD_UI_ROLE_PREPARE and assigned the pfcg role to a user.
The user is apparently able to perform navigation as required. However, when a ST01 trace is run for the user, there are few missing authorizations for UIU_COMP. Could anyone please explain the reason for this? No changes have been made to object UIU_COMP i.e. only values generated by the report is present there. Should the missing authorizations be added manually to the role?

I would recomend that you define for component UIU_COMP in your pfcg role full access (all set to *), because this authorization object is used for access to web ui components. Even thou if you define this object to full access users will still see just components defined in business role.
Regards.

Toubleshooting on missing authorization.

Hi SAP all gurus,
I have a problem regarding troubleshooting on missing authorization issues.
I got a ticket to solve the missing authorization, i tried with SU53 to solve that. and I got 20 similar roles regarding the missing authorization when I check with SUIM. My question is which role I want to assign the end user from those 20 roles. FYI all 20 roles have that missing authorization identity.I'm confused which role is helpful for me. Please give me your valuble suggestions and its very helpful to me.
Thanks in advance,
Sridhar

Hi Sridhar
Running an SU53, finding an authorisation failure and then hunting for an additional role to assign isn't the answer really (well - there are no perfect answers - just different ways of doing things).
Say the user is running ME22N everyday and, when trying to change one particular purchase order one day they get a 'you are not authorised' message. They complain bitterly to their work colleagues who say 'well I can do it'. then to their manager who looks at the screen, tuts, and tells the user to fire off an email or log a call with the help desk right away as it's stopping them doing their job.
That user may have been working perfectly well for many years, doing the same task until today, their colleagues (who can run the transaction) have joined recently, having moved positions in the business and can access the purchase order no problem.
The thing is - should they really be able to change this one purchase order or not? They've managed fine, processing perfectly as expected with no complaints from any other person in the procurement chain.
Having an authorisation failure and getting it fixed isn't always the thing to do, the user may actually have the correct access and all the other people may have too much access. In this example the user may have failed on doc type UB when all they should be accessing is doc type NB, the more recent joiners have access because of badly controlled access requests or legacy access..
You need to use logic (and hopefully some competent role owners) to make sure you aren't assigning any old role just to clear a logged ticket.
Hope this helps a little bit!
Kind regards
David

Profit center and comapny code missing authorization problem.

Could you help any body,i have some missing authorization problem with profit center and company code,
How to search the roles which having require profit and company code values.
Is there any way to search.
Please let us know very fast.
Thanks in advance

Another, and probably much easier way, is just to use Ctrl + Y... and use subsets of the selections in the SUIM reports.
But I can well understand the temptation to use tables or at least double-check the SUIM output against them.
The bugger with tables is that you can easy make the same mistakes or more than the SUIM reports do, or use old obsolete tables, or incorrect logic when interpreting single fields of the user tables.
Personally, I would normally check the exits first. Developers don't always raise self-explanatory messages...
Cheers,
Julius

Missing authorization for processing condition

Hi All,
We are having a problem with our pricing procedure zxxx.
we created a pricing procedure and connect it to a java formula.
this formula return an error message :
" Missing authorization for processing condition zxxx "
in debug we see that this message come from the formula and not some kind of authorization check.
( even a user with "sap all" get this message ).
does any one know how to solve this?
or:
does any one know how to debug the java formula ?
thanks,
Lilach.

Hi,
Check with your basis consultant whether the authorization is change ?
Regards,
Chetan.

Missing authorization already filled in

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for