Missing authorization for transaction VC/2 (Sales summary)

Hi Expert,
I am running transaction VC/2, but I get the message VB500 "the list is incomplete due to missing authorizations".
Via transaction SU53, I see that it is object M_INFO_MCB with auth. field MCINF which is missing.
Do you know what this object field is about?
Thank you.
Kind regards,
Linda

Hi,
First goto SUIM T.Code.
click on "Authorisation Objects".
Select "Authorization Objects by Complex Selection Criteria".
Enter "M_INFO_MCB" as "Authorization object".
Execute.
It shows that this is related to "Evaluation: Evaluation Structure".
The path is:
SPRO>Logistics General>Logistics Information system(LIS)>Flexible Analyses>Select layout reports for evaluation structures.
Maintain values here.
Save.
Regards,
Krishna.

Similar Messages

Cancel a SD invoice error message "no authorization for transaction FB08"

Hi Gurus,
I am trying to cancel a SD invoice and am receiving the error message " no authorization for transaction FB08" is coming. Never has this happened in past, i have checked all the security authorizations also and they are in place. Accounting document status is showing as not cleared. Also, as per my understanding cancellation of invoice happens through VF11 which does not calls FB08. Please point out reasons as to why this could be happening and the possible solution thereof.
regards
Anmol Pareek

Hi Anmol
Once you got the error screen, immediately after that goto T code SU53 and expand all link. Take the screen shot and send it to your BASIS team to provide you proper access.
Yes you are correct cancellation is done through VF11 but sometime some programs internally calls other T codes.
take help of your basis team.

Missing authorization for the plant - Message no. ME303

Missing authorization for the plant - Message no. ME303
I am getting the above error while creating the PO.
what is the cause of error?
How do I rectify this?
I have used the right data, till yday it was working fine. I doubt some config change has happened

Hi,
Check with your basis consultant whether the authorization is change ?
Regards,
Chetan.

Missing authorization for plant ' '

User is missing authorization for plant ' '
User trace gives the following missing authorization
Object:
M_IS_WERKS RC=4 MCINF=S039;WERKS=' '
Can anybody help me out to find the meaning of space( ' ' ) in plant or any field?
thank you in advace

* Prüfung, ob Berechtigung für die Werke existiert
SELECT * FROM T001W INTO TABLE AW_HLP_T001W
                      WHERE WERKS IN AW_WERKS.
DESCRIBE TABLE AW_WERKS LINES SY-TFILL.
IF SY-TFILL > 0.
    FLG_SELECT = 'X'.
ENDIF.
<b> clear aw_hlp_t001w-werks.                       " note 124769, ver.04
collect aw_hlp_t001w.                           " note 124769, ver.04</b>
LOOP AT AW_HLP_T001W.
    AUTHORITY-CHECK OBJECT 'M_IS_WERKS'
             ID 'MCINF' FIELD AW_MCINF
             ID 'WERKS' FIELD AW_HLP_T001W-WERKS.
There must be a reason to add an empty line, which causes the silly authority check. As far as I understand Note 124769 you have got to add plant ' '. See Note 408003: ."Create an authorization for the authorization object M_IS_WERKS which contains the value WERK = . Refer to Note 124769."

EDMS: 'Missing authorization for this functionality' when searching user

Hi,
I've activated ALC authorization for DMS. In EDMS, when trying to add an user to a DIR with search function an error occurres as below.
'Missing authorization for this functionality'
BTW, the user has contains SAP_ALL profile. It can't be any authorization reasons.
Regards,
Yemi

Hi,
authorization checks will not happen if the search help from sap-gui.I
think the problem is releted to missing implementation of "check
function module" from your side. If the search help is linked to a
"master data table" (type A) a check function must be implemented to
check the permission of the user.
This function module is read from table BAPIF4T. Please
check the following link: http://help.sa
p.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/a5/3eca044ac011d189
4e0000e829fbbd/content.htm
http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/PLM/Object+Link+search+in+EasyDMS
Regards,
Hari

Missing authorizations for authorization object UIU_COMP

I have generated the pfcg role for a business role using report CRMD_UI_ROLE_PREPARE and assigned the pfcg role to a user.
The user is apparently able to perform navigation as required. However, when a ST01 trace is run for the user, there are few missing authorizations for UIU_COMP. Could anyone please explain the reason for this? No changes have been made to object UIU_COMP i.e. only values generated by the report is present there. Should the missing authorizations be added manually to the role?

I would recomend that you define for component UIU_COMP in your pfcg role full access (all set to *), because this authorization object is used for access to web ui components. Even thou if you define this object to full access users will still see just components defined in business role.
Regards.

Missing authorization for processing condition

Hi All,
We are having a problem with our pricing procedure zxxx.
we created a pricing procedure and connect it to a java formula.
this formula return an error message :
" Missing authorization for processing condition zxxx "
in debug we see that this message come from the formula and not some kind of authorization check.
( even a user with "sap all" get this message ).
does any one know how to solve this?
or:
does any one know how to debug the java formula ?
thanks,
Lilach.

Hi,
Check with your basis consultant whether the authorization is change ?
Regards,
Chetan.

Authorization for transaction VL09

Hi Experts,
I have a requirement to get authorization for transaction VL09 for specific user based on document type of the delivery. Please let me know is there any specific enhancement point or user exit to add authorization group for this.
Thanks,
Karthikeyan.

Hi,
    Please check the below ...
Enhancement
V50S0001                                User Exits for Delivery Processing
Business Add-in
DELIVERY_ADDR_SAP                       Address Change in Delivery Processing
DELIVERY_PUBLISH                        Announcement of delivery data during database update
Regards,
Srini.

CK40N error: Missing authorization for BOM (SAP Error: CK-581)

Hi Experts,
When running CK40N, I found an error message Missing authorization for BOM (SAP Error: CK-581).
If this is the problem of my CK40N that make object cannot be costed, how can I solve this? Is this relate to SAP authorizartion?
Thanks.
sbmel

Hello,
While doing Costing run CK40N or Cost estimate CK11N, you require having authorization of T. Code CS03 for the plant in your SAP ID as it explodes BOM.
Kindly contact basis team & take the authorization on your SAP ID.
Regards,
Anand

Maintenance of Authorization for transactions in CRM 5.0.

Hi Experts .
We are using CRM 5.0 with PCUI.
TheBusiness requirement is to maintain authorization for own transactions.the users who is involved in transactions should only be authorized to Open & see the transactions.Other users who are not involved in partner function like "Assigned to" & "Account responsible " should not be able to open & see the transactions like Activity .Lead , Opportunity ,Sales orders.& Service orders.System should give error message saying no authorizations.
We tried with below authorization objects to achieve this
CRM_ORD_OP (your own documents)
- CRM_ORD_LP (organization levels)
- CRM_ORD_PR (transaction type)
- CRM_ORD_OE (sales area/service Org).
- CRM_ORD_RL
- CRM_ORD_RS
But still system allows to open transaction belong to others.
Is there any alternative to control this.
Helpful answers would be rewarded max points.
Thanks in Advance.
Regards,
Basavaraj Patil

Hello
in order to check authority object CRM_ORD_OE,
CRM_ORD_OP and CRM_ORD_LP must not give authority. Please see
online documentation for detailed information:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_crm40/helpdata/en/e9/
b29a39e7aee372e10000000a11402f/frameset.htm
Under the chapter 'Process Flow of Authorization Check in Business
Transactions' you will find detailed explanations.
I hope that I could be of help with that information.
Gerhard

Authorization for Change Conditions in Sale order or Billing document

Good Morning
In my scenario we have same pricing procedure for sale order and billing document. My requirement is to enter one condition manually in sales order.
I want a specific user to enter this discount condition for a specific distribution channel only manually only in Sales order, not in billing document.
Now here are some problems i am facing now.
We have to make this for one user and for one distribution channel only.
I can't use transaction variant to make condition tab in display because all users are allowed to enter freight condition manually at the time of invoicing.
I have tried authorization object V_KONH_VKS but its not working. This is for maintain condition record not for entering in sales or billing document manually.
Please suggest me is there any standard way to do this or should I go for ABAP?
I prefer to do this with authorizations control. ABAP will be the last solution.

I have a feeling that via PFCG, this can be controlled and of course, with the object what you had indicated and Activity type.
Create two roles one for maintaining manually in sale order and the other one for display.
In one role, the activity can be 01 with TCode VA01 and VA02 and in the second role, the activity can be 03 with transaction VF01. Your basis guy should be able to do this so that the requirement can be achieved.
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

Authorizations for transactions MIR6/MIR4

Hi All,
Need help to setup a security rights for transactions MIR6/MIR4.
Here is the situation:
We have setup an user profiles which allow the users to access
transaction mir6 (provide a list of Invoide Documents(BELNR)which will
lead into transaction MIR4, but we only want this group of users have
the ability to Held the document NO POSTING RIGHTS. I have set user with role:
MM_RELEASE_INVOICE users can access
Please advice on how to go around with this security problem.
Thanks in advance.
Srii...

Hi,
one possible solution (though not tested personally) is via
badi INVOICE_UPDATE and method CHANGE_AT_SAVE.
Within this method you can do something like:
    CHECK sy-tcode = 'MIR4' OR sy-tcode = 'MIR6'.
* Get OK-CODE of the main window
    CONSTANTS: c_okcode(17) TYPE c VALUE '(SAPLMR1M)OK-CODE'.
    FIELD-SYMBOLS: <fs_okcode> TYPE ANY.
    ASSIGN (c_okcode) TO <fs_okcode>.
    DATA: l_okcode LIKE sy-ucomm.
    CLEAR l_okcode.
    l_okcode = <fs_okcode>.
* Read user authorizations with FM
* SUSR_USER_AUTH_FOR_OBJ_GET
IF USER NOT ALLOWED.
* Do not allow posting
      CASE sy-ucomm.
        WHEN 'BU'.
          CLEAR <fs_okcode>.
          MESSAGE e061(zxxx) RAISING error_with_message.
      ENDCASE.
ENDIF.
Best regards.
Edited by: Pablo Casamayor on Oct 31, 2008 7:51 PM

Authorization for Delivering Plant in Sales Order

Dear All:
We need to set up authorization for a user based on 'delivering plant' in Sales Order registration (VA01). It appears there is no standard available for this.
Can you kindly help by giving hints to achieve this?
Regards,
K. Dwarakanath

Hi,
1. You can create a custom authorization object (via SU21 or equivalent); add field 'ACTVT' with permissible values '01', '02', '03'.
2. In form USEREXIT_CHECK_VBAP of include MV45AFZB, you can call the function module AUTHORITY_CHECK, to check the authorization and throw an error.
This user exit is triggered everytime a user makes any change to item level, i.e. applicable for change of plant too. The call for authority check can be based on whether plant is changed or not. I guess *VBAP and VBAP can be compared to check whether plant is changed. If *VBAP-WERKS is not equal to VBAP-WERKS, then call authority check FM by passing username, custom object name, FIELD1 = 'ACTVT', VALUE1 = 01 or 02. If exception returned by FM is USER_NOT_AUTHORIZED, you can throw an error message.
Cheers,
KC

Authorization for transaction created in se80

Hi all , i have created few transaction in se80 , now i want my transaction to run only if the person authorised for that is using that , means authorization for these transactions so can i do this in this way, pls reply if anyone know the procedure

Hi Ado,
You also have disable other Auth. Objects (CRM_ORD_LP CRM_ORD_OP,CRM_ORD_TE), because they work together.
Please, see screenshot under Business Transaction ->Authorization Check in Business Transactions -> Process Flow of the Authorization Check in Business Transactions:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_crm70/helpdata/EN/f6/57fa3ab5573919e10000000a114084/frameset.htm
Regards,
Vadim.

Authorizations for transactions MIR6/MIR4/MIR7

Dear Reader
Need help to setup a security rights for transactions mir6/mir4/mir7.
Here is the situation:
We have setup an AP user profiles which allow the users to access
transaction mir6 (provide a list of outstanding PARK document)which will
lead into transaction MIR4, but we only want this group of users have
the ability to park/view the document NO POSTING RIGHTS. I have set the
security on object M_RECH_WRK to 3 (display only) than it will cause the
the other problem which is the user can not access transaction MIR7, BUT
if I grant access 77 (pre-enter) to object M_RECH_WRK than the users can
access transaction MIR7 AND HE HAS RIGHTS TO POST IN TRANSACTION MIR4.
Please advice on how to go around with this security problem.
Thanks in advance.
Regards
Tony

Have you got answer to this question, can you try to restrict the user based on authority object "F_BKPF_KOA", Its being checked while trying to post.

Missing authorization for transaction VC/2 (Sales summary)

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for