Missing Function List in DW CS6

For some reason, the context menu that lists functions in the current file stopped working. When I hover over it, nothing happens.
I'm using Dreamweaver CS6 on a MAC.
Any ideas how I can fix it.
Thanks for your help.
Jack

Yes, that is what I am not seeing. The tutorial I was following is
"Dreamweaver CS6 Essential Training
with James Williamson" in "chapter 10: Inserting list menu items" on
Lynda.com here:
http://www.lynda.com/sdk/Dreamweaver-tutorials/Dreamweaver-CS6-Essential-Training/97613-2. html.
When "Select (List/Menu)" is selected, a window for "Input Tag
Accessibility Attributes" is supposed to pop up. This allows typing in
ID and Label names and a Tab Index number, etc. The tutorial also shows
radio buttons for List or Menu types in the Properties panel at the
bottom which I don't see.

Similar Messages

Php function list autocomplete in CS6

Hi all, i have a problem in CS6 when i push Ctrl + Space the Php function list is not showing in code hint panel.
For example usually when y write, "mysql_f" and then press Ctrl + Space, mysql_fecth_array and mysql_fetch_row, was show in code hint panel.
Now in CS6 this not work, or i don't know how do it.
¿How i can fix this?
P.d: I read that disable JQuery hints in preference options make that "$_" global var show; but function list no.
Thanks in advance.

Moved to the Developing server-side applications with Dreamweaver forum.
I have just tested Ctr+Space in Dreamweaver CS6 in both Windows 7 and Mac OS X 10.8. It works without problem on both systems.
Make sure you're using a PHP page, and that you're in a PHP code block. Also, code hints stop working if you have a syntax error earlier in your code.
Sometimes, if you experience strange behaviour with Dreamweaver, it helps to delete the cache file or even the whole of your configuration folder. See http://forums.adobe.com/thread/494811 for details.

Missing Parts List While creating Prd. Order

Hi Friends,
My client is creating production Orders Manually thru CO01and While Creating & Saving The Production Order System Is Not Supporting In Giving Missing Parts list In spite Of Deficit of Un Restricted stock inStorage Location For BOM components used in that Order.
To my surprise when the defisit is for all the BOM components only one component is showing as missing part in missing parts list.
But While confirming the order The system is showing missing parts for all the components which are defisit for order confirmation.
I Tried To Get This From the Following Method
Checked For Define checking control In OPJK.
Selected plant, Order type & selected the business function 1 for create or 2 for release. And Maintained These Settings
a) Removed tick mark in No Availability check.
b) Type of component check Given as - ATP check.
c) Material release - 1. User decides on release if parts are missing.
d) PP Checking rule (Which Is same As with plant parameter OPPQ)
e) In Define scope of check (OPJJ) made a tick mark in check w/o RLT.
Then Assigned the availability checking group at Mrp View of Header material.
In spite Of All These Settings Still At The Time Of Order Release/Save A Warning Massage Or A Informative Massage Is Not Appearing
*Please Suggestu2026u2026u2026u2026*
hari

Hi,
Please check same checking rule use in Material master and with order type and plant?
Check the cheking group in material master MRP3 view for all material.
Go to Transection OPJJ - Maintain scope of check,
Select your Checking rule which you have assing to your order type and tick INLCUDE RESERVATION.
(1). CO24- Missing Parts Information System
Under this transaction you choose Selection from Reservations and then select Plant & Material then you can get Missing Parts List for your respective material without production / planned order also.
(2). COOIS : Production Order Information System
Under this transaction you need to Select in List option as Components and then go on Selection Tab.
For collective availability check use
COHV - Excute the roport w ith collective avaliabilty check.
COMAC.
Hope this help.
Regards,
R.Brahmankar

Missing Part list for Plant to Plant Purchase order

Hi,
      I need the following requirement in CO24,
      In CO24 its shows the missing parts for Sales order, similarly we want the missing parts list for Plant to Plant Purchase order in the same report. Also the report,
1.It should not consider the Planned order for a sales order.
2.It should not consider the planned order which can be convert into purchase requisition.
3.The procurement type should be "E" or "X".
Kindly guide me is there any standard layout changes in available or any development we have to do.
Thanks
Muthamil Murugan.G

Hi Purushothaman,
If you have the following settings in OPJK:
Plant                 XXXX
Order Type       XXXX
Availability Check    2
[X]Status Check
[X]Check material availability when saving order (may not need)
Checking Rule        PP PP checking rule
Component Check Type    ATP check
Release material     2 Release permitted despite missing parts
Then in COHV you try to mass release the order with the following parameter:
List: Order Header
Selection: Your selection criteria
Mass processing:
Function: Release
Max. No.of Processes 99
Save Log: Always
Release control order: Collective Order Release
Then after the order is released, you can find the missing part list of that order in CO03 menu path:
Goto->Missing Parts->Missing parts list
Hope it helps.
Regards,
Rachel

OWB bugs, missing functionality and the future of OWB

I'm working with OWB for some time now and there are a lot of rough edges to discover. Functionality and stability leave a lot to be desired. Here's a small and incomplete list of things that annoy me:
Some annoying OWB bugs (OWB 10g 10.1.0.2.0):
- The debugger doesn't display the output parameters of procedures called in pre-mapping processes (displays nothing, treats values as NULL). The mapping itself works fine though.
- When calling selfmade functions within an expression OWB precedes the function call with a constant "Functions." which prevents the function from being executed and results in an error message
- Occasionally OWB cannot open mappings and displays an error message (null pointer exception). In this case the mapping cannot be opened anymore.
- Occasionally when executing mappings OWB doesn't remember changes in mappings even when the changes were committed and deployed
- When using aggregators in mappings OWB scrambles the order of the output attributes
- The deployment of mappings sometimes doesn't work. After n retries it works without having changed anything in the mapping
- When recreating an external table directly after dropping the table OWB recreates the external table but always displays both an error message and a success message.
- In Key Lookups the screen always gets garbled when selecting an attribute as a join condition
- Usage of constants results in aborts in the debugger
- When you reconcile a table used in a key lookup the lookup condition sometimes changes. OWB seems to remember only the position of the lookup condition attribute but not the name.
- In the process of validating a mapping often changes in the mapping get lost and errors occur like 'Internal Errors' or 'Null Pointer Exceptions'.
- When you save the definition of external tables OWB always adds 2 whitespace columns to the beginning of all the lines following 'ORGANISATION EXTERNAL'. If you save a lot of external table definitions you get files with hundreds of leading whitespaces.
Poor or missing functionality:
- No logging on the level of single records possible. I'd like the possibility to see the status of each single record in each operator like using 'verbose data' in PowerCenter
- The order of the attributes cannot be changed. This really pisses me off expecially if operators like the aggregator scramble the order of attributes.
- No variables in expressions possible
- Almost unusable lookup functionality (no cascading lookups, no lookup overrides, no unconnected lookups, only equal condition in key lookups)
- No SQL overrides in soruces possible
- No mapplets, shared containers or any kind a reusable transformations
- No overview functionality for mappings. Often it's very hard to find a leftover operator in a big mapping.
- No copy function for attributes
- Printing functionality is completely useless
- No documentation functionality for mappings (reports)
- Debugger itself needs debugging
- It's very difficult to mark connections between attributes of different operations. It's almost impossible to mark a group of connections without marking connections you don't want to mark.
I really wonder which of the above bugs and mssing functionality 'Paris' will address. From what I read about 'Paris' not many if at all. If Oracle really wants to be a competitor (with regard to functionality) to Informatica, IBM/Ascential etc. they have a whole lot of work to do or purchase Informatica or another of the leading etl tool
vendors.
What do you think about OWB? Will it be a competitor for the leading etl tools or just a cheap database add on and become widely used like SAB BW not for reasons of technology or functionality but because it's cheap?
Looking forward to your opinions.
Jörg Menker

Thanks to you two for entertaining my thoughts so far. Let me respond to you latest comments.
Okay, lets not argue which one is better.. when a tool is there .. then there are some reasons to be there...But the points raised by Jorg and me are really very annoying. Overall I agree with both yours and Jorg's points (and I did not think it was an argument...merely sharing our observations with each other (;^)
The OWB tool is not as mature as Informatica. However, Informatica has no foothold in the database engine itself and as I mentioned earlier, is still "on the outside looking in..." The efficiency and power of set-based activity versus row-based activity is substantial.
Looking at it from another way lets take a look at Microstrategy as a way of observing a technical strategy for product development. Microstrategy focused on the internals (the engine) and developed it into the "heavy-lifting" tool in the industry. It did this primarily by leveraging the power of the backend...the database and the hosting server. For sheer brute force, it was champion of the day. It was less concerned with the pretty presentation and more concerned with getting the data out of the back-end so the user didn't have to sit there for a day and wait. Now they have begun to focus on the presentation part.
Likewise this seems to be the strategy that Oracle has used for OWB. It is designed around the database engine and leverages the power of the database to do its work. Informatica (probably because it needs to be all things to all people) has tended to view the technical offerings of the database engine as a secondary consideration in its architectural approach and has probably been forced to do so more now that Oracle has put themselves in direct competition with Informatica. To do otherwise would make their product too complex to maintain and more vendor-specific.
I am into the third data warehousing/data migration project and my previous two have been on Informatica (3 years on it).I respect your experience and your opinions...you are not a first timer. The tasks we have both had to solve and how we solved them with these tools are not necessarily the same. Could be similar in instances; could be quite different.
So the general tendency is to evaluate the tool and try to see how things that were needed to be done in my previous projects can be done with this tool. I am afraid to say .. I am still not sure how these can be implemented in OWB. The points raised by us are probably the fall out of this deficiency.One observation that I would make is that in my experience, calls to the procedural language in the database engine have tended to perform very poorly with Informatica. Informatica's scripting language is week. Therefore, if you do not have direct usability of a good, strong procedural language to tackle some complicated tasks, then you will be in a pickle when the solution is not well suited to a relational-based approach. Informatica wants you to do most things outside of the database (in the map primarily). It is how you implement the transformation logic. OWB is built entirely around the relational, procedural, and ETL components in the Oracle database engine. That is what the tool is all about.
If cost is the major factor for deciding a tool then OWB stands far ahead...Depends entirely on the client and the situation. I have implemented solutions for large companies and small companies. I don't use a table saw to cut cake and I don't use a pin knife to fall trees. Right tool for the right job.
...thats what most managers do .. without even looking how in turn by selecting such a tool they make the life tough for the developers.Been there many times. Few non-technical managers understand the process of tool evaluation and selection and the value a good process adds to the project. Nor do they understand the implications of making a bad choice (cost, productivity, maintainability).
The functionality of OWB stands way below Informatica.If you are primarily a GUI-based implementer that is true. However, I have often found that when I have been brought in to fix performance problems with Informatica implementations that the primary problem is usually with the way that the developer implemented it. Too often I have found that the developer understands how to implement logic in the GUI component (the Designer/Maps and Sessions) with a complete lack of understanding of how all this activity will impact load performance (they don't understand how the database engine works.) For example, a strong feature in Informatica is the ability to override the default SQL statement generated by Informatica. This was a smart design decision on Informatica's part. I have frequently had to go into the "code" and fix bad joins, split up complex operations, and rip out convoluted logic to get the maps to perform within a reasonable load window. Too often these developers are only viewing the problem through the "window" of the tool. They are not stepping back and look at the problem in the context of the overall architecture. In part Informatica forces them to do this. Another possible factor is they probably don't know better.
"One tool...one solution"
Microstrategy until recently had been suffering from that same condition of not allowing the developer to create the actual query). OWB engineers need to rethink their strategy on overriding the SQL.
The functionality of OWB stands way below Informatica.In some ways yes. If you do a head-to-head comparison of the GUI then yes. In other ways OWB is better (Informatica does not measure up when you compare it with all of the architectural features that the Oracle database engine offers). They need to fix the bugs and annoyances though.
.. but even the GUI of Informatica is better than OWB and gives the developer some satisfaction of working in it.Believe me I feel your pain. On the other hand, I have suffered from Informatica bugs. Ever do a port from one database eingine to another just to have it convert everything into multi-byte? Ever have it re-define your maps to parallel processing threads when you didn't ask it to?
Looking at the technical side of things I can give you one fine example ... there is no function in Oracle doing to_integer (to_number is there) but Informatica does that ... Hmm-m-m...sorry, I don't get the point.
The style of ETL approach of Informatica is far more appealing.I find it unnecessarily over-engineered.
OWB has two advantages : It is basically free of cost and it has a big brother in Oracle.
It is basically free of cost...When you are another "Microsoft", you can throw your weight around. The message for Informatica is "don't bite the hand that feeds you." Bad decisions at the top.
Regards,
Dan Phillips

Scope of Check Variation in Missing Part list Production Order

Hi,
I have a problem that While creation or conversion from planned order to production order if i get missing part list i found that Scope of check is as Z6 and ZP (Checking rule).But when when i Release the same production order also am getting missing part list here when i check scope of check as Z6 and PP(Checking rule).
Why this difference is coming,can any body tell the possible causes.
Cheers,
Kumar.S

>
KUMAR.S. wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a problem that While creation or conversion from planned order to production order if i get missing part list i found that Scope of check is as Z6 and ZP (Checking rule).But when when i Release the same production order also am getting missing part list here when i check scope of check as Z6 and PP(Checking rule).
>
> Why this difference is coming,can any body tell the possible causes.
>
> Cheers,
> Kumar.S
Kumar,
Its simple for creation and release of Production order different checking rule is used(This must be intentional). You check this in OPJK transaction, check for your order type / Plant combination for Business function 1(Create) the checking rule assigned would be ZP, whereas for the same order type / Plant combination for Business function 2(Release) the checking rule would be PP.
If you want the same, you can change it here. But I assume there must have been a purpose for this custom checking rule creation. You can find the scope of check difference between these 2 combinations in transaction OPJJ.
Regards,
Prasobh

1.2.0 breaks "missed reminder list" feature that has worked for 10+ years

According to WebOs 1.2.0 release notes, there is a new "feature": If you tap Snooze on a calendar event notification, the notification no longer reappears after the event end time. What this actually means is, if you dismiss a notification by ANY MEANS AVAILABLE (Snooze, close application, back gesture), you will NEVER AGAIN see that notification in your "missed reminder list" after the end time of the event.
Unfortunately, that exactly how me, my wife, and a lot of other folks handle an on the fly TODO List. You put the event on your calendar when you expect to be able to work on it... if you can't take care of it at that precise moment, you ignore it and it goes on your "missed reminder list", to be dealt with later. All forms of "ignoring" now cause a Snooze and all forms of snooze will remove your event from the notification list when it's end time is passed. Essentially, the "missed reminder list" serves no function now, as its only available during the 30 minutes or so that you may have something scheduled for.
WRONG CHOICE PALM! WHY WOULD YOU CHANGE A 10+ YEAR OLD BEHAVIOR ON SOME RANDOM WEBOS RELEASE?? if you want to know how it should behave, pick up any Treo or pre 1.2.0 WebOs release.
PLEASE, PLEASE PLEASE BRING BACK THE BEHAVIOR OF ARCHIVING EVERY MISSED EVENT UNTIL IT IS EXPLICITLY ACKNOWLEDGED.
THANKS, Eric
Post relates to: Pre p100eww (Sprint)

Eric - you nailed this one!
I just noticed this a few days ago and have been "nursing" a "test" calendar entry along through the day trying to come up with a pattern/reason as to why my missed calendar notifications are disappearing. Someone at Precentral pointed out, to me, that WebOS 1.2.0 included this new "feature" so I came here to see if I was alone in my frustration regarding the logic behind having WebOS automatically decide that I no longer need to see a calendar reminder that is supposed to remind me of the things I can't remember myself. Instead of doing just that, WebOS is now as weak as my own brain and can't remember what I need to do either!
I'm completely stumped at why this needed to change. If there's a good reason, perhaps Palm could put a toggle option in WebOS so ME,MYSELF,I can decide when those notifications are removed - ***NOT*** let the OS decide that I don't need to see them anymore - crazy.
Now I need to carry a small post-it note pad with me (or use Tasks/Notes and keep it open). Calendar is now almost worthless to me after being an asset for a decade or more.
Gerry

IDOC for missing parts list

Hi,
We would like to send the missing parts list generated from CO24 to other system. Is there any standard IDOC available to send missing parts?
I would appreciate your help.
Thanks.

Karthik,
Thanks for your quick reply. But this is not what I am looking out for. I am sorry, I think my question was not clear.
There is one functionality in Production Planning area that we can find out the missing parts for the production order. We have to send the information to our warehouse asking for the missing parts to fulfill the production order. Our warehouse is not on SAP so we want to send the information through an ALE/IDOC. In order to do this I wanted to know that is there any standard IDOC type which can be used or we have to create a custom IDOC.
Thanks.

Camera Raw 6.6 missing functions

I use PSE 10 with Camera Raw 6.6. It appears to be missing functions such as the paint brush and the ability to mask. I've tried downloading it again, but the additional functions did not reappear. Any suggestions?

Masking is only available in conjunction with sharpening under the detail tab. Hold down the alt key whist dragging the making slider to see how sharpening will be applied to edges.
There is no adjustment brush tool available in the Elements version of camera raw. It’s only available in CS6 or Lightroom.

Is there a list of all cs6/cs5 shortcuts?

Hi
is there a list of all cs6 & cs5 shortcuts ?
in the past i found them here http://morris-photographics.com/photoshop/shortcuts/index.html
but now there is only cc and cs4
and the author told me he got no time to update cs6 & cs5 for windows , but with all the shortcuts
is there please a full list of all the cs6/cs5 shortcuts?
thanks
ps i googled a lot but did not find a full list

Try using Photoshop Help sometimes you find what your looking for...
Key shortcuts for CS6 features.
Download | Photoshop CC keyboard shortcut reference (PDF)
Keys for selecting tools
Keys for viewing images
Keys for Puppet Warp
Keys for Refine Edge
Keys for the Filter Gallery
Keys for Liquify
Keys for Vanishing Point
Keys for the Camera Raw dialog box
Keys for the Black-and-White dialog box
Keys for Curves
Keys for selecting and moving objects
Keys for transforming selections, selection borders, and paths
Keys for editing paths
Keys for painting
Keys for blending modes
Keys for selecting and editing text
Keys for formatting type
Keys for slicing and optimizing
Keys for using panels
Keys for the Actions panel
Keys for adjustment layers
Keys for the Animation panel in Frames mode
Keys for the Animation panel in Timeline Mode (Photoshop Extended)
Keys for the Brush panel
Keys for the Channels panel
Keys for the Clone Source panel
Keys for the Color panel
Keys for the History panel
Keys for the Info panel
Keys for the Layers panel
Keys for the Layer Comps panel
Keys for the Paths panel
Keys for the Swatches panel
Keys for 3D tools (Photoshop Extended)
Keys for measurement (Photoshop Extended)
Keys for DICOM files (Photoshop Extended)
Keys for Extract and Pattern Maker (optional plug-ins)
Function keys

I got problem when trying to contact my iphone 4 using facetime,it did ringing,but my iphone 4 did not receive that call as if nothing happen.But,when the call ended,that call appeared in the missed call list.fyi both are connected to internet.

i got problem when trying to call my iphone 4 using facetime with my Macbook Pro 13',it did ringing,but my iphone 4 did not receive that call as if nothing happen.But,when the call ended,that call appeared in the missed call list.fyi both are connected to internet.Help!! thank you in advance

i got problem when trying to call my iphone 4 using facetime with my Macbook Pro 13',it did ringing,but my iphone 4 did not receive that call as if nothing happen.But,when the call ended,that call appeared in the missed call list.fyi both are connected to internet.Help!! thank you in advance

Missing Functionality: Dunning Wizard - We need table CRD1

Hello,
Missing Functionality: Dunning Wizard - We need table CRD1 in the dunning PLD templates!!!
This Workaround is impossible.
As a workaround I suggest to store this information in the UDFs that you would create on the OCRD table that is exposed in the dunning PLD templates.

keine Antwort ist auch eine Antwort

MISSING FUNCTIONALITY-The field "VatIdUnCmp" is not exposed in DI API & DTW

The field "VatIdUnCmp" (Unified Federal Tax ID) is not exposed by the
DI API and therefore not available in DTW.
This is a missing functionality.
In order to have this non-legal requirement, as request in the note 1028874, I send this development request
Thanks for your cooperation.
Fabio Fambrini

Maybe check here:
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/c5f5dbcc-0a01-0010-5d82-f25f2bee715e
HTH,
Frank

Packaging data is not saved in document draft (missing functionality)

Dear all,
Packaging data, usually typed with delivery note, is not saved together with Delivery Note draft (No matter the draft is saved manually or automatically by approval procedure).
I have tested on SBO 2005B latest patch, 2007B latest patch, and 8.8 version, they all do not save packaging data in draft.
The draft related tables for packaging (DRF7, DRF8) are already existed in SBO, I encourage to get this missing functionality back.
My customers are highly needed for this function for better operation flow.
It would be appreciated if this request could be implemented in the near future patch.
Thanks in advance

Have also just discovered that this functionality is missing, although we were going to be using it when saving an AR Invoice as Draft. This is a major hole and is going to cause a big issue for a current implementation where this method was going to be used to create 'Split Deliveries' without making the account postings and allow Despatch paperwork for the Shipping company to be printed. The solution was going to be extremely simple, but now potentially is going to result in a substantial SDK development.
It would be useful to know whether there is any likelihood that it will be resolved in the near future, i.e. in a patch for 2007A SP1 or 8.8.

Mail for Exchange Missing Functions E71 v E72

Hi All,
So I have been using an E71 with Mail for Exhcange for some time now and find it is very good.
However
I have an E72 with Mail for Exhcange already installed on the device BUT it clearly has missing functions whihc I had on the previous version on Mail fo Exchangeo n the E71.
These are
Comp Directory - Very useful for looking up contacts details from the GAB
View Log in Mail for Exchange. This is useful to see what the error is for a reason why the device may not be syncing with the MS Exchange Server.
Full resync in mail for Exchange. This again useful for support as other users will tell you that if the two systems have got their wires twisted, a full resync can fix the problem!
What version of the software do I have? Helps for future support and upgrades.
So Mr Nokia Software Developer. When can we have these functions added? Do we have to drop this software tool and device....
MODERATOR'S NOTE:
We have edited your post. Please be advised that feedback on Nokia devices are accepted in the forum provided that they are written in an acceptable manner such as tone and the choice of words.

As far as the version number goes - it's not a misprint, it's just they way Nokia numbering scheme works. build 2.09 is version 2.9. Similarly in Nokia Maps build 3.04 is called version 3.4... go figure.
Lumia 920, Lumia 800
Nokia N8-00 (NAM, Product Code: 059C8T6), Symbian Belle, Type RM-596, 111.030.0609
Nokia 5800 XpressMusic (NAM, Product Code: 0577454) Software v51.2.007, Type RM-428

Missing Function List in DW CS6

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for