Missing functionality request. Deleting manufacturers.

Version:  2007A SP:00 PL:46
Manufacturers cannot be removed or deleted. Administration > Setup > Inventory > Manufacturers.
Business needs: Certain Manufacturers no longer exist so our client needs to be able to maintain an updated list of Manufacturers.
Examples: Similar to setting up a Vendor Group, you should be able to remove a manufacturer by going to: Data > Remove.  Or right click and select remove.
Proposed solution: Please insert u201CRemoveu201D as an option in the Data menu, or insert u201CRemoveu201D as a right click option to remove manufacturers.
I tested in SBO 8.8 and a manufacturer still cannot be deleted or removed.

Your enhancement is good. But we can edit the field and can update. Once we are done update in the manufacture field the entire item master data will update accordingly.
Regards,
M.Senthil

Similar Messages

  • Missing Functionality Request: Ability to Remove Manufacturers

    SAP 8.8
    Ability to remove a manufacturer if there are no associated items

    Hi,
    It will be nice to have this function. However, before this can be adopted and added to any new release, you may try work around to replace those orphan Manufacturers with new ones.
    Thanks,
    Gordon

  • Missing functionality Request: report "last prices" with BP name

    In the report "last prices" (if Checkbox "BP code" is not checked) one sees only the GP code and not the BP name. This is very unfavorable if an item was very often sold in several customers.
    Edited by: Inga Babco on Jan 31, 2008 10:27 AM

    I am not using form , it's just done in report, that is i am not calling the report from a form , just from a menu.
    :last_name is a report_paramter that i created on the report.
    you're right the first assignmnt is
    AND UPPER( db column) LIKE
    I have a paramter form on the report with a field last name and I am letting the user enter last name there which gets stored in the :last_name
    Edited by: Forms_Reports_Beginner on Aug 14, 2009 7:29 AM
    Edited by: Forms_Reports_Beginner on Aug 14, 2009 7:32 AM
    Rodolfo,
    your solution works,
    :p_where_clause := ' AND UPPER( db_column ) LIKE (' ||''''||'%'||UPPER(Replace(:p_2,chr(39), chr(39)||chr(39)))||'%'||''''||')' ;
    but i dont quite understand how this is working
    Replace(:p_2,chr(39), chr(39)||chr(39))
    i have never used chr
    Edited by: Forms_Reports_Beginner on Aug 14, 2009 7:35 AM

  • Photoshop 2014 receive error  message saying components missing. I  deleted  app as requested, how do I reinstall ? Its is not I'm my creative cloud to do so?

    Photoshop 2014 receive error message saying components missing. I deleted app as requested, how do I reinstall ? Its is not I'm my creative cloud to do so?

    This might help...
    Use the CC Cleaner Tool to solve installation problems | CC, CS3-CS6
    -Noel

  • Data request deletion problem from remote system.

    Hi experts.
    Now i am facing one critical problem . The description is as following:
    we design the edw level in one phsical BW machine(A) which contains only dso infoprovider. This machine(A) works as datasource to provide data to another physical BW machine(B).
    The dso in A system is exported as datasource , Cubes in B system load data through this datasource .
    We first do the initialization with data contained on B system and then load delta data from A system. But if we want to delete some request in system A ,the system indicate this request can not be deleted unless the initialization in system B is deleted( this will lead to all the data missing in system B).
    Can anyone explain this mechanism to me , please help me suggesting some kind of methods to delete the request in system A without deleting the initialization information in system B.
    Thanks in advance.
    Waiting online for your kindly reply.

    1. Ask your Basis to look into it.
    2. try analyse your Baqckground Process in SM51.
    3. Is your Deletion Job started immediately or any Delay?
    4. If That cube or ODS has only this request which you are deleting, go with Context Menu Cube or ODS (by right click) --> Delete Contents.
    Delete Contents will improve performence compare to Request Deletion..
    If you have request more than this, you should not go for this.
    Nagesh Ganisetti.
    Assign points if it helps.

  • MISSING FUNCTIONALITY-The field "VatIdUnCmp" is not exposed in DI API & DTW

    The field "VatIdUnCmp" (Unified Federal Tax ID) is not exposed by the
    DI API and therefore not available in DTW.
    This is a missing functionality.
    In order to have this non-legal requirement, as request in the note 1028874, I send this development request
    Thanks for your cooperation.
    Fabio Fambrini

    Maybe check here:
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/c5f5dbcc-0a01-0010-5d82-f25f2bee715e
    HTH,
    Frank

  • Packaging data is not saved in document draft (missing functionality)

    Dear all,
    Packaging data, usually typed with delivery note, is not saved together with Delivery Note draft (No matter the draft is saved manually or automatically by approval procedure).
    I have tested on SBO 2005B latest patch, 2007B latest patch, and 8.8 version, they all do not save packaging data in draft.
    The draft related tables for packaging (DRF7, DRF8) are already existed in SBO, I encourage to get this missing functionality back.
    My customers are highly needed for this function for better operation flow.
    It would be appreciated if this request could be implemented in the near future patch.
    Thanks in advance

    Have also just discovered that this functionality is missing, although we were going to be using it when saving an AR Invoice as Draft. This is a major hole and is going to cause a big issue for a current implementation where this method was going to be used to create 'Split Deliveries' without making the account postings and allow Despatch paperwork for the Shipping company to be printed. The solution was going to be extremely simple, but now potentially is going to result in a substantial SDK development.
    It would be useful to know whether there is any likelihood that it will be resolved in the near future, i.e. in a patch for 2007A SP1 or 8.8.

  • Missing Functionality: Dunning Wizard - We need table CRD1

    Hello,
    Missing Functionality: Dunning Wizard - We need table CRD1 in the dunning PLD templates!!!
    This Workaround is impossible.
    As a workaround I suggest to store this information in the UDFs that you would create on the OCRD table that is exposed in the dunning PLD templates.

    keine Antwort ist auch eine Antwort

  • Change of functionality in deleting songs from iCloud/iTunes Match with the 11.0.2 version of iTunes?

    I updated to iTunes 11.0.2 and this version brought a change of wording regarding deleting songs from iCloud/iTunes Match, and I'd like to know if there are any changes in functionality to match the change in wording:
    With version 11.0.2, when I try to delete any song (uploaded, matched or purchased) I'm presented with a pop-up dialog box that asks me if I'm sure and also gives me a "Also hide this song from iCloud?" option.
    In prior iTunes versions the pop-up dialog box would ask instead "Also delete this song from iCloud?".
    Has the functionality changed? If so, what's the difference in functionality between 11.0.2 and previous versions? If the functionality of deleting songs has changed, how do I delete an uploaded song from both my local library and iCloud/iTunes Match?

    I am having the same issue- pelase could anyone help? Mods?

  • After mountain lion download the "back" function of delete key no longer is working.

    After mountain lion download the "back" function of delete key no longer is working.

    Here is your answer, I think.
    https://discussions.apple.com/message/19048177#19048177

  • Mail for Exchange Missing Functions E71 v E72

    Hi All,
    So I have been using an E71 with Mail for Exhcange for some time now and find it is very good.
    However
    I have an E72 with Mail for Exhcange already installed on the device BUT it clearly has missing functions whihc I had on the previous version on Mail fo Exchangeo n the E71.
    These are
    Comp Directory - Very useful for looking up contacts details from the GAB
    View Log in Mail for Exchange. This is useful to see what the error is for a reason why the device may not be syncing with the MS Exchange Server.
    Full resync in mail for Exchange. This again useful for support as other users will tell you that if the two systems have got their wires twisted, a full resync can fix the problem!
    What version of the software do I have? Helps for future support and upgrades.
    So Mr Nokia Software Developer. When can we have these functions added? Do we have to drop this software tool and device....
    MODERATOR'S NOTE:
    We have edited your post. Please be advised that feedback on Nokia devices are accepted in the forum provided that they are written in an acceptable manner such as tone and the choice of words.

    As far as the version number goes - it's not a misprint, it's just they way Nokia numbering scheme works.  build 2.09 is version 2.9.  Similarly in Nokia Maps build 3.04 is called version 3.4... go figure.
    Lumia 920, Lumia 800
    Nokia N8-00 (NAM, Product Code: 059C8T6), Symbian Belle, Type RM-596, 111.030.0609
    Nokia 5800 XpressMusic (NAM, Product Code: 0577454) Software v51.2.007, Type RM-428

  • OWB bugs, missing functionality and the future of OWB

    I'm working with OWB for some time now and there are a lot of rough edges to discover. Functionality and stability leave a lot to be desired. Here's a small and incomplete list of things that annoy me:
    Some annoying OWB bugs (OWB 10g 10.1.0.2.0):
    - The debugger doesn't display the output parameters of procedures called in pre-mapping processes (displays nothing, treats values as NULL). The mapping itself works fine though.
    - When calling selfmade functions within an expression OWB precedes the function call with a constant "Functions." which prevents the function from being executed and results in an error message
    - Occasionally OWB cannot open mappings and displays an error message (null pointer exception). In this case the mapping cannot be opened anymore.
    - Occasionally when executing mappings OWB doesn't remember changes in mappings even when the changes were committed and deployed
    - When using aggregators in mappings OWB scrambles the order of the output attributes
    - The deployment of mappings sometimes doesn't work. After n retries it works without having changed anything in the mapping
    - When recreating an external table directly after dropping the table OWB recreates the external table but always displays both an error message and a success message.
    - In Key Lookups the screen always gets garbled when selecting an attribute as a join condition
    - Usage of constants results in aborts in the debugger
    - When you reconcile a table used in a key lookup the lookup condition sometimes changes. OWB seems to remember only the position of the lookup condition attribute but not the name.
    - In the process of validating a mapping often changes in the mapping get lost and errors occur like 'Internal Errors' or 'Null Pointer Exceptions'.
    - When you save the definition of external tables OWB always adds 2 whitespace columns to the beginning of all the lines following 'ORGANISATION EXTERNAL'. If you save a lot of external table definitions you get files with hundreds of leading whitespaces.
    Poor or missing functionality:
    - No logging on the level of single records possible. I'd like the possibility to see the status of each single record in each operator like using 'verbose data' in PowerCenter
    - The order of the attributes cannot be changed. This really pisses me off expecially if operators like the aggregator scramble the order of attributes.
    - No variables in expressions possible
    - Almost unusable lookup functionality (no cascading lookups, no lookup overrides, no unconnected lookups, only equal condition in key lookups)
    - No SQL overrides in soruces possible
    - No mapplets, shared containers or any kind a reusable transformations
    - No overview functionality for mappings. Often it's very hard to find a leftover operator in a big mapping.
    - No copy function for attributes
    - Printing functionality is completely useless
    - No documentation functionality for mappings (reports)
    - Debugger itself needs debugging
    - It's very difficult to mark connections between attributes of different operations. It's almost impossible to mark a group of connections without marking connections you don't want to mark.
    I really wonder which of the above bugs and mssing functionality 'Paris' will address. From what I read about 'Paris' not many if at all. If Oracle really wants to be a competitor (with regard to functionality) to Informatica, IBM/Ascential etc. they have a whole lot of work to do or purchase Informatica or another of the leading etl tool
    vendors.
    What do you think about OWB? Will it be a competitor for the leading etl tools or just a cheap database add on and become widely used like SAB BW not for reasons of technology or functionality but because it's cheap?
    Looking forward to your opinions.
    Jörg Menker

    Thanks to you two for entertaining my thoughts so far. Let me respond to you latest comments.
    Okay, lets not argue which one is better.. when a tool is there .. then there are some reasons to be there...But the points raised by Jorg and me are really very annoying. Overall I agree with both yours and Jorg's points (and I did not think it was an argument...merely sharing our observations with each other (;^)
    The OWB tool is not as mature as Informatica. However, Informatica has no foothold in the database engine itself and as I mentioned earlier, is still "on the outside looking in..." The efficiency and power of set-based activity versus row-based activity is substantial.
    Looking at it from another way lets take a look at Microstrategy as a way of observing a technical strategy for product development. Microstrategy focused on the internals (the engine) and developed it into the "heavy-lifting" tool in the industry. It did this primarily by leveraging the power of the backend...the database and the hosting server. For sheer brute force, it was champion of the day. It was less concerned with the pretty presentation and more concerned with getting the data out of the back-end so the user didn't have to sit there for a day and wait. Now they have begun to focus on the presentation part.
    Likewise this seems to be the strategy that Oracle has used for OWB. It is designed around the database engine and leverages the power of the database to do its work. Informatica (probably because it needs to be all things to all people) has tended to view the technical offerings of the database engine as a secondary consideration in its architectural approach and has probably been forced to do so more now that Oracle has put themselves in direct competition with Informatica. To do otherwise would make their product too complex to maintain and more vendor-specific.
    I am into the third data warehousing/data migration project and my previous two have been on Informatica (3 years on it).I respect your experience and your opinions...you are not a first timer. The tasks we have both had to solve and how we solved them with these tools are not necessarily the same. Could be similar in instances; could be quite different.
    So the general tendency is to evaluate the tool and try to see how things that were needed to be done in my previous projects can be done with this tool. I am afraid to say .. I am still not sure how these can be implemented in OWB. The points raised by us are probably the fall out of this deficiency.One observation that I would make is that in my experience, calls to the procedural language in the database engine have tended to perform very poorly with Informatica. Informatica's scripting language is week. Therefore, if you do not have direct usability of a good, strong procedural language to tackle some complicated tasks, then you will be in a pickle when the solution is not well suited to a relational-based approach. Informatica wants you to do most things outside of the database (in the map primarily). It is how you implement the transformation logic. OWB is built entirely around the relational, procedural, and ETL components in the Oracle database engine. That is what the tool is all about.
    If cost is the major factor for deciding a tool then OWB stands far ahead...Depends entirely on the client and the situation. I have implemented solutions for large companies and small companies. I don't use a table saw to cut cake and I don't use a pin knife to fall trees. Right tool for the right job.
    ...thats what most managers do .. without even looking how in turn by selecting such a tool they make the life tough for the developers.Been there many times. Few non-technical managers understand the process of tool evaluation and selection and the value a good process adds to the project. Nor do they understand the implications of making a bad choice (cost, productivity, maintainability).
    The functionality of OWB stands way below Informatica.If you are primarily a GUI-based implementer that is true. However, I have often found that when I have been brought in to fix performance problems with Informatica implementations that the primary problem is usually with the way that the developer implemented it. Too often I have found that the developer understands how to implement logic in the GUI component (the Designer/Maps and Sessions) with a complete lack of understanding of how all this activity will impact load performance (they don't understand how the database engine works.) For example, a strong feature in Informatica is the ability to override the default SQL statement generated by Informatica. This was a smart design decision on Informatica's part. I have frequently had to go into the "code" and fix bad joins, split up complex operations, and rip out convoluted logic to get the maps to perform within a reasonable load window. Too often these developers are only viewing the problem through the "window" of the tool. They are not stepping back and look at the problem in the context of the overall architecture. In part Informatica forces them to do this. Another possible factor is they probably don't know better.
    "One tool...one solution"
    Microstrategy until recently had been suffering from that same condition of not allowing the developer to create the actual query). OWB engineers need to rethink their strategy on overriding the SQL.
    The functionality of OWB stands way below Informatica.In some ways yes. If you do a head-to-head comparison of the GUI then yes. In other ways OWB is better (Informatica does not measure up when you compare it with all of the architectural features that the Oracle database engine offers). They need to fix the bugs and annoyances though.
    .. but even the GUI of Informatica is better than OWB and gives the developer some satisfaction of working in it.Believe me I feel your pain. On the other hand, I have suffered from Informatica bugs. Ever do a port from one database eingine to another just to have it convert everything into multi-byte? Ever have it re-define your maps to parallel processing threads when you didn't ask it to?
    Looking at the technical side of things I can give you one fine example ... there is no function in Oracle doing to_integer (to_number is there) but Informatica does that ... Hmm-m-m...sorry, I don't get the point.
    The style of ETL approach of Informatica is far more appealing.I find it unnecessarily over-engineered.
    OWB has two advantages : It is basically free of cost and it has a big brother in Oracle.
    It is basically free of cost...When you are another "Microsoft", you can throw your weight around. The message for Informatica is "don't bite the hand that feeds you." Bad decisions at the top.
    Regards,
    Dan Phillips

  • Using FCE 4 to edit mov file, inserted 8 chapter markers by double tap M, enter title, click add chapter marker.  Rendered and half of the chapter markers unrecognized or not functional.  Delete FCE prefs and redo project did not help.  How to fix?

    Using FCE 4 to edit mov file.  Added 8 chapter markers by double tap M, enter title, click add chapter marker.  Rendered and 4 of the chapter markers are skipped or not functioning.  Deleting FCE prefs and rebuild project did not solve.  Solution anyone? 

    Thanks for taking a look, I am pretty new on a Mac, is this the data you need?

  • Missing Function Modules - EWA_MAIN_BUSINESS_HOURS & READ_STAMP

    Hi Gurus,
    When i am generating EWA for system in Solution Manager, i am getting the error
    under Service Preparation
    - Missing Function Modules
    1. EWA_MAIN_BUSINESS_HOURS
    2. READ_STAMP
    *In the satellite system,tcode-sdccn*
    Below are the errors:
    1) EWA_MAIN_BUSINESS_HOURS : no matching interface found
    function module not found
    EWA_MAIN_BUSINESS_HOURS : funcname /SDF/MAIN_BUSINESS_HOURS , module 000156
    2) READ_RFC_LIST : # of imp params in funcmod < # of imp params in mod 000152
    READ_RFC_LIST : inconsistency in # of imp params found for mod 000152
    READ_RFC_LIST : non-default imp param IF_ANONYMIZE is not passed to mod 000152
    READ_STAMP : no matching interface found
    function module not found
    READ_STAMP : funcname /BDL/READ_STAMP , module 000153
    Can Anybody help me to resolve this issue.
    Regards,
    Ashok

    The modules EWA_MAIN_BUSINESS_HOURS, READ_STAMP and READ_RFC_LIST are supplied with the next version of ST-PI, which is currently scheduled to be released for customers on December 15. I can only ask you to ignore the error until after the next version of ST-PI has been installed on the system.
    Please be informed that the errors are not critical and will disappear
    by installing the latest ST-PI which will be release around december the
    15th 2008.
    Edited by: Felipe Pitta on Dec 2, 2008 12:22 PM

  • InfoPackage with overlapping requests deletion

    Hi,
    what is an InfoPackage with overlapping requests deletion? Where is it used?
    Regards

    hi,
    check out the below link it answers your query in detail.
    Re: Delete overlapping request
    hope it helps.
    regards,
    AL

Maybe you are looking for