Missing Functionality: Trackingnumber in Goods return

Version: (Please provide the current version)
SAP Business One 2005A - SP01 - PL41
Description of requirements: (Please provide a detailed description)
We need the field "tracking number" in return deliveries to
suppliers. This
field is provided under "logistics" for normal deliveries but does
not exist
for return deliveries.
Business needs: (Please describe the impact on your business, if the
functionality is not realized)
We need to print the tracking number on our delivery notes. For return
deliveries we now have to add it manually.
Examples: (Please describe a typical example, how the functionality
should work.)
The field "tracking number" should be made available under
"logistics" also
for return deliveries so that the tracking number can be printed
automatically on the delivery note.
Current Workaround: (Please describe the workarounds you are using at
the moment)
Add the tracking number manually.
Proposed solution: (Please suggest how the new functionality should
work)
See Examples.

I assume this doesn't happen in the non-overriden view objects. Can you provide more information on what functionality you have overriden since getEstimatedRowCount() doesn't seem to work in your version of the view object?

Similar Messages

  • Copy to Goods Receipt PO function on Goods Return

    In current version 2007A there is no Copy to Goods Receipt PO function on Goods Return document. There is only Copy to A/P Credit Memo. This list should contain all available target documents.

    Yes, you can.  You just need to go to add A/P invoice and click on Copy From button.  Then select multiple GRPO to copy.  However, you will be warned that only target FX rate can be used if you have BP currency instead of LC.
    Thanks,
    Gordon

  • Goods receipts and Goods returns against PO

    Hello gurus
    Good day to you. please find my requirement below
    1. i am get ting GR against PO data from legacy system and i need to post Good receipts or Goods retruns documents (ie based on the quantity recieved, if it is +ve value for quantity then post goods receipt against PO and if it is -ve value for quantity then post goods returns against PO) in SAP by using PI as middleware.
    2. IDOC provided is MBGMCR03 and message type is MGBMCR.
    So now my question is based on the received quantity i have to change the movement type as 101 and 102 respectively in idoc mapping of PI but i want to know how can i do that. i am little  confused about the usage of the idoc type provided in mapping like how can create IDOC with goods receipt or goods return based on the received quantity.
    I request you to please let me know the process to follow. can i use only one idoc provided for mapping and can i do this task in only one interface, please clarify. if i can use the idoc provided and if i can do this task in one interface (ie legacy - PI - SAP), please let me know the steps which i need to follow to complete my scernario successfully.
    Thanks and Regards
    Raj

    Hi,
    >>>i am little confused about the usage of the idoc type provided in mapping like how can create IDOC with goods receipt or goods return based on the received quantity.
    you cna use function substring (from standard graphical message mapping)
    and use it to check the first char of the quantity
    if it's - then map 102 to the MOVE_TYPE field of the idoc
    if not then map 101...
    I never worked with 102 with MBGMCR but 101 against a PO works for 100%
    Regards,
    Michal Krawczyk

  • Goods Return from Production

    How the rejected goods (at prdn) can be return from Production to stores, as the function in production of goods return is not working.( Issued production order of 10 nos, production completed for 8 nos, the remaining 2 are rejected & to be return to stores for further material accounting)

    Shailesh,
    When you are receiving goods after production suppose you have to receive 10 goods out of them 8 are OK and 2 are defective then in the receipt from production form you can enter the first line item by choosing the production Order from the production order Tab below and change the Quantity to 8 which you would like to enter into the Main warehouse while in the next line item manually enter the same Production order no. and in the qty column enter the 2 no.s of Defective goods and change the Wahrehouse no. to Stores. and add the form.
    Now when you see the stock you will notice that in the Stores WH stock will increase by 2.
    Please let me know if this has solved your problem.
    Nagesh

  • Mail for Exchange Missing Functions E71 v E72

    Hi All,
    So I have been using an E71 with Mail for Exhcange for some time now and find it is very good.
    However
    I have an E72 with Mail for Exhcange already installed on the device BUT it clearly has missing functions whihc I had on the previous version on Mail fo Exchangeo n the E71.
    These are
    Comp Directory - Very useful for looking up contacts details from the GAB
    View Log in Mail for Exchange. This is useful to see what the error is for a reason why the device may not be syncing with the MS Exchange Server.
    Full resync in mail for Exchange. This again useful for support as other users will tell you that if the two systems have got their wires twisted, a full resync can fix the problem!
    What version of the software do I have? Helps for future support and upgrades.
    So Mr Nokia Software Developer. When can we have these functions added? Do we have to drop this software tool and device....
    MODERATOR'S NOTE:
    We have edited your post. Please be advised that feedback on Nokia devices are accepted in the forum provided that they are written in an acceptable manner such as tone and the choice of words.

    As far as the version number goes - it's not a misprint, it's just they way Nokia numbering scheme works.  build 2.09 is version 2.9.  Similarly in Nokia Maps build 3.04 is called version 3.4... go figure.
    Lumia 920, Lumia 800
    Nokia N8-00 (NAM, Product Code: 059C8T6), Symbian Belle, Type RM-596, 111.030.0609
    Nokia 5800 XpressMusic (NAM, Product Code: 0577454) Software v51.2.007, Type RM-428

  • OWB bugs, missing functionality and the future of OWB

    I'm working with OWB for some time now and there are a lot of rough edges to discover. Functionality and stability leave a lot to be desired. Here's a small and incomplete list of things that annoy me:
    Some annoying OWB bugs (OWB 10g 10.1.0.2.0):
    - The debugger doesn't display the output parameters of procedures called in pre-mapping processes (displays nothing, treats values as NULL). The mapping itself works fine though.
    - When calling selfmade functions within an expression OWB precedes the function call with a constant "Functions." which prevents the function from being executed and results in an error message
    - Occasionally OWB cannot open mappings and displays an error message (null pointer exception). In this case the mapping cannot be opened anymore.
    - Occasionally when executing mappings OWB doesn't remember changes in mappings even when the changes were committed and deployed
    - When using aggregators in mappings OWB scrambles the order of the output attributes
    - The deployment of mappings sometimes doesn't work. After n retries it works without having changed anything in the mapping
    - When recreating an external table directly after dropping the table OWB recreates the external table but always displays both an error message and a success message.
    - In Key Lookups the screen always gets garbled when selecting an attribute as a join condition
    - Usage of constants results in aborts in the debugger
    - When you reconcile a table used in a key lookup the lookup condition sometimes changes. OWB seems to remember only the position of the lookup condition attribute but not the name.
    - In the process of validating a mapping often changes in the mapping get lost and errors occur like 'Internal Errors' or 'Null Pointer Exceptions'.
    - When you save the definition of external tables OWB always adds 2 whitespace columns to the beginning of all the lines following 'ORGANISATION EXTERNAL'. If you save a lot of external table definitions you get files with hundreds of leading whitespaces.
    Poor or missing functionality:
    - No logging on the level of single records possible. I'd like the possibility to see the status of each single record in each operator like using 'verbose data' in PowerCenter
    - The order of the attributes cannot be changed. This really pisses me off expecially if operators like the aggregator scramble the order of attributes.
    - No variables in expressions possible
    - Almost unusable lookup functionality (no cascading lookups, no lookup overrides, no unconnected lookups, only equal condition in key lookups)
    - No SQL overrides in soruces possible
    - No mapplets, shared containers or any kind a reusable transformations
    - No overview functionality for mappings. Often it's very hard to find a leftover operator in a big mapping.
    - No copy function for attributes
    - Printing functionality is completely useless
    - No documentation functionality for mappings (reports)
    - Debugger itself needs debugging
    - It's very difficult to mark connections between attributes of different operations. It's almost impossible to mark a group of connections without marking connections you don't want to mark.
    I really wonder which of the above bugs and mssing functionality 'Paris' will address. From what I read about 'Paris' not many if at all. If Oracle really wants to be a competitor (with regard to functionality) to Informatica, IBM/Ascential etc. they have a whole lot of work to do or purchase Informatica or another of the leading etl tool
    vendors.
    What do you think about OWB? Will it be a competitor for the leading etl tools or just a cheap database add on and become widely used like SAB BW not for reasons of technology or functionality but because it's cheap?
    Looking forward to your opinions.
    Jörg Menker

    Thanks to you two for entertaining my thoughts so far. Let me respond to you latest comments.
    Okay, lets not argue which one is better.. when a tool is there .. then there are some reasons to be there...But the points raised by Jorg and me are really very annoying. Overall I agree with both yours and Jorg's points (and I did not think it was an argument...merely sharing our observations with each other (;^)
    The OWB tool is not as mature as Informatica. However, Informatica has no foothold in the database engine itself and as I mentioned earlier, is still "on the outside looking in..." The efficiency and power of set-based activity versus row-based activity is substantial.
    Looking at it from another way lets take a look at Microstrategy as a way of observing a technical strategy for product development. Microstrategy focused on the internals (the engine) and developed it into the "heavy-lifting" tool in the industry. It did this primarily by leveraging the power of the backend...the database and the hosting server. For sheer brute force, it was champion of the day. It was less concerned with the pretty presentation and more concerned with getting the data out of the back-end so the user didn't have to sit there for a day and wait. Now they have begun to focus on the presentation part.
    Likewise this seems to be the strategy that Oracle has used for OWB. It is designed around the database engine and leverages the power of the database to do its work. Informatica (probably because it needs to be all things to all people) has tended to view the technical offerings of the database engine as a secondary consideration in its architectural approach and has probably been forced to do so more now that Oracle has put themselves in direct competition with Informatica. To do otherwise would make their product too complex to maintain and more vendor-specific.
    I am into the third data warehousing/data migration project and my previous two have been on Informatica (3 years on it).I respect your experience and your opinions...you are not a first timer. The tasks we have both had to solve and how we solved them with these tools are not necessarily the same. Could be similar in instances; could be quite different.
    So the general tendency is to evaluate the tool and try to see how things that were needed to be done in my previous projects can be done with this tool. I am afraid to say .. I am still not sure how these can be implemented in OWB. The points raised by us are probably the fall out of this deficiency.One observation that I would make is that in my experience, calls to the procedural language in the database engine have tended to perform very poorly with Informatica. Informatica's scripting language is week. Therefore, if you do not have direct usability of a good, strong procedural language to tackle some complicated tasks, then you will be in a pickle when the solution is not well suited to a relational-based approach. Informatica wants you to do most things outside of the database (in the map primarily). It is how you implement the transformation logic. OWB is built entirely around the relational, procedural, and ETL components in the Oracle database engine. That is what the tool is all about.
    If cost is the major factor for deciding a tool then OWB stands far ahead...Depends entirely on the client and the situation. I have implemented solutions for large companies and small companies. I don't use a table saw to cut cake and I don't use a pin knife to fall trees. Right tool for the right job.
    ...thats what most managers do .. without even looking how in turn by selecting such a tool they make the life tough for the developers.Been there many times. Few non-technical managers understand the process of tool evaluation and selection and the value a good process adds to the project. Nor do they understand the implications of making a bad choice (cost, productivity, maintainability).
    The functionality of OWB stands way below Informatica.If you are primarily a GUI-based implementer that is true. However, I have often found that when I have been brought in to fix performance problems with Informatica implementations that the primary problem is usually with the way that the developer implemented it. Too often I have found that the developer understands how to implement logic in the GUI component (the Designer/Maps and Sessions) with a complete lack of understanding of how all this activity will impact load performance (they don't understand how the database engine works.) For example, a strong feature in Informatica is the ability to override the default SQL statement generated by Informatica. This was a smart design decision on Informatica's part. I have frequently had to go into the "code" and fix bad joins, split up complex operations, and rip out convoluted logic to get the maps to perform within a reasonable load window. Too often these developers are only viewing the problem through the "window" of the tool. They are not stepping back and look at the problem in the context of the overall architecture. In part Informatica forces them to do this. Another possible factor is they probably don't know better.
    "One tool...one solution"
    Microstrategy until recently had been suffering from that same condition of not allowing the developer to create the actual query). OWB engineers need to rethink their strategy on overriding the SQL.
    The functionality of OWB stands way below Informatica.In some ways yes. If you do a head-to-head comparison of the GUI then yes. In other ways OWB is better (Informatica does not measure up when you compare it with all of the architectural features that the Oracle database engine offers). They need to fix the bugs and annoyances though.
    .. but even the GUI of Informatica is better than OWB and gives the developer some satisfaction of working in it.Believe me I feel your pain. On the other hand, I have suffered from Informatica bugs. Ever do a port from one database eingine to another just to have it convert everything into multi-byte? Ever have it re-define your maps to parallel processing threads when you didn't ask it to?
    Looking at the technical side of things I can give you one fine example ... there is no function in Oracle doing to_integer (to_number is there) but Informatica does that ... Hmm-m-m...sorry, I don't get the point.
    The style of ETL approach of Informatica is far more appealing.I find it unnecessarily over-engineered.
    OWB has two advantages : It is basically free of cost and it has a big brother in Oracle.
    It is basically free of cost...When you are another "Microsoft", you can throw your weight around. The message for Informatica is "don't bite the hand that feeds you." Bad decisions at the top.
    Regards,
    Dan Phillips

  • Error in Goods Return

    HI,
    We are getting the message after posting goods return as below
    Transaction..   MB1A
    Update key...   4D834C143DEB0114E10080000A60052C
    Generated....   18.03.2011, 18:01:25
    Completed....   18.03.2011, 18:01:25
    Error Info...   Update program: I/O error Error; function Update, RC= 4, key
    Please help for resolve the same.
    Regards,
    Harshal

    Hi Harshal,
    Use the below link,
    [Update termination error while doing PGR;
    Thanks
    Hrishi

  • Missing part check at goods receipt or transfer posting

    How Missing part check at goods receipt or transfer posting is different from availabilty check in production order.??
    In which conditions we would use Missing part check at goods receipt or transfer posting ??
    Is it possible for same component to behave differently in Missing part check at goods receipt or transfer posting or availabilty check in production order ?

    missing parts check is possible at the time of a goods receipt, other receipt, or transfer posting.
    if the missing parts check function is active in the plant, the system checks whether the material posted as a receipt is a missing part.
    if it is a missing part, the system issues a warning message and sends an e-mail to the MRP controller responsible in the plant. assigning the missing part to a particular goods recipient takes place with the missing part processing in the application component Warehouse Management
    please also check here:
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/41/191fdb45fd11d188ff0000e8322f96/frameset.htm

  • A/P Credit Memo in relation with Goods Return

    Dears,
    I'm not able to make an A/P Goods Return after Making a Credit Memo.
    Because as I have the Credit Memo as a Financial Document, also I want to have a Goods Return as an Inventory Document.
    Kindly Advice.
    Thanks,
    Kerolous Samuel

    Dear,
    Credit memo is nothing but reversal of total INVOICE.
    As you said, you are not able to  make goods return,
    1) Check stock is available or not.If not revers the consumption entry
    2) If you are using QM integration for GRN , system will generate an inspection lot for GRN.So now you need to reverse this inspection lot, so that stock will update in QUALITY STOCK.
    Then you can return the stock using MIGO transaction(122 movement type). or
    3) Assign the material code in P.O and activate check box as "RETURNS ITEM" and save.
    4) Then do GRN using transaction MIGO for this return material.
    Kindly check posting dates also for the inventory changes.
    Regards,
    pardhu

  • Goods Receipt PO, Based on Goods Return, Including Serials

    Hi All,
    When you received an item to stock from your vendor, and the item was defective,
    You should return the item to the vendor using 'Goods Return'.
    What should one do in the following case:
    Instead of crediting the returned item - the vendor decided to fix the defective part - and resend it to our stock.
         The normal procedure, as I know it, would be to copy the 'Goods Return' to a 'Goods Receipt PO'.
    However, if the item is managed by serials - The system won't allow me to return the same serial to stock,
    and only lets me create a new serial.
    If I will type the original serial manually in the 'Goods Receipt PO', the system will simply create a new record in the serial table (assuming duplicated serials are allowed).
    What is the correct way to handle this situation ?
    Many Thanks ! 

    Anyone ??
    Pretty Please .....

  • Goods return

    Hello,
    I have a question concerning purchasing module:
    If I create a goods return from Goods receipt (which is based on a purchase order), does the purchase order status changes from closed to open?
    Thank you.
    Best regards,

    Hi,
    Create a goods return from Goods receipt will not change the purchase order status from closed to open.
    Only in the newest 8.81 version, you have ability to reopen PO based on this. All old versions will just keep PO closed. You have to recreate PO.
    Thanks,
    Gordon

  • Closing an Open Goods Return Document

    Hi to all
    We also experienced returning goods that were already paid and were invoiced through A/P reserve invoice (same case with Avelino Fidel - thread on AP Reserve Invoice posted last Apr. 19). In our case, not all items were returned and withholding tax was applied in the original AP reserve invoice.   Refund was given by the supplier.
    Original A/P Reserve Invoice - Journal Entry
    Þ     Dr. u2013 Goods Received Not yet Invoiced          10,000
    Þ     Cr. u2013 Supplier                                                          9,900
    Þ     Cr. u2013 Withholding Tax Payable                                    100
    Original Goods Receipt PO - Journal Entry
    Þ     Dr. u2013 u2013 Supplies, Materials and Parts            10,000
    Þ     Cr. u2013 Goods Received Not yet Invoiced                    10,000
    Original Outgoing Payment - Journal Entry
    Þ     Dr. u2013 BP                               9,900
    Þ     Cr. u2013 Bank                                         9,900
    In order to transact the returns in SAP, we tried using Goods Return without base document instead of A/P Credit Memo in order to incorporate the tax withheld.  (in A/P Credit Memo, tax withheld cannot be applied when there's no base document).  Journal entry is as follows:
    Þ     Dr. u2013 Goods Received Not yet Invoiced                    5,000
    Þ     Cr. u2013 Supplies, Materials and Parts                                     5,000
    After Goods Return, we used Bank Reconcilation to close the Goods Return with the following entries:
    Þ     Cr. u2013 Goods Received Not yet Invoiced                                 5,000
    Þ     Dr. u2013 Supplier                                                        4,950
    Þ     Dr. u2013 Withholding Tax Payable                                    50
    Þ     Cr. u2013 Supplier                                                                      4,950
    Þ     Dr. u2013 Bank                                                            4,950 ( refund from supplier )
    When I checked the Goods Return status using Banking -> Bank Statements & Reconciliations, the ap credit memo is no longer in the list. However, when I checked its status using Purchasing A/P -> Goods Return, the document status is still open.  Then we tried I tried closing the document through DATA >> CLOSE but an error message appeared: No matching records found u2018G/L Accountsu2019 (OACT) (ODBC-2028)
    How can we change the status of the Goods Return Document to closed ?  Shouldn't it be automatically closed after doing the bank reconciliation?
    Thanks in advance.
    Luche

    Hi Luche
    In SAP Business One 2007 there are some new features for closing documents without having to pass them on to the Invoice/Credit Memo. In the case of purchasing documents you can now close the Goods Receipt PO and the Goods Return documents. In order for the system to account for the income or loss as a result of the document not being passed on to a payable document, it looks for the account number marked as Goods Clearing Account in the account determination. If this account number is not filled in you will get the error you saw.
    Hope this helps
    Kind regards
    Peter Juby

  • Missing Functionality: Dunning Wizard - We need table CRD1

    Hello,
    Missing Functionality: Dunning Wizard - We need table CRD1 in the dunning PLD templates!!!
    This Workaround is impossible.
    As a workaround I suggest to store this information in the UDFs that you would create on the OCRD table that is exposed in the dunning PLD templates.

    keine Antwort ist auch eine Antwort

  • List of Open AP Goods return on a specific Date

    My customer needs a list of all open AP goods return, that were still open on a specific date.
    They need to do this for month end, the open list, has to match what is in the Trial balance at month end.
    I have tried with open item list, but this only shows me as of today.
    I have tried with the General ledger by BP, but since the Goods return does not affect the Accounts receivable it is not displayed in this report.
    I have also tried creating a report, but there is no information in the ORPD table that allows me to filter properly.
    does anyone have any suggestions ?
    Thanks
    Sophie

    Sophie,
    One possibility is to use ADOC (history table)
    SELECT * FROM ADOC WHERE ObjType = 21
    Pick the columns you want to display.

  • Landed costs can not get Goods receipt PO when Goods return made

    Hi, everybody
    I need to calculate landed costs and it seems that I can not use when I built a Goods return.
    My procedure as follow ( ps: the same vendor number)
    1. created a PO then Goods receipt PO (docNum says 1111) which included 20 quanties for item no AAAA.
    2. created a Goods return which Copy from Goods receipt PO no: 1111, which included 5 quanties for item no AAAA.
    3. next, I try to caculate my Landed costs. I open a new Landed costs and click the button "Goods Receipt PO", but I can not find any Goods receipt PO no: 1111.
    What can I do to caculate my exactly landed costs & Goods receipt PO no: 1111 that included 15 quanties?
    Thanks for your help

    When you only Returned partial goods from your Receipt.  The Receipt should still be open and you should be able to process the Landed cost. I am not sure why the GR is not showing in the landed costs window.
    Please check if the GR is closed by an AP Invoice / by itself.
    Otherwise, you will need to process AP Goods Return for the remaining 15 and process a New Goods Receipt for 15.
    Regards
    Suda

Maybe you are looking for