Missing functions in Slideshow Editor?

I am (clearly) a novice Aperture user, and am struggling with the Slideshow Editor Default Settings set up.
I would like to add text to various slides in a slideshow. BUT...
I have looked through all the booklet and online help with regards to adding text to a slide, so have selected the 'Slideshow Settings Button' and page 143 shows the text functions I need, but in my 'Default Settings' pane the 'Transition' options and the 'Text' options are missing. (Only Aspect Ratio, Background and Play slide for X seconds is showing) Can you add these other options manually? If so - please help!
Many thanks, please forgive my daft question, but I just gave up looking for it!
Gem

Nathan,
You are a superstar, and looking at my slideshow theme selections - absolutely spot-on! None of the 3 I'd set up were 'Classic' or 'Ken Burns', so I've swapped themes and can now do what I needed.
Thanks everso, and have a lovely New Year.
Gem

Similar Messages

How do I reconnect missing files in the Slideshow Editor?

I created a slideshow and set up everything (pan/zoom, size, etc) and it worked fine.
I saved the project before closing it and had created an output video at 800x600. For some reason I could not create the 1024x768 video.
After shutting down for the night I tried to reopen it again and see if the 1024x768 would work. We will be showing this video on a 12 foot screen of this 1024x768 dimension pixel size… so I like to save it at that dimension.
When I opened the “Slideshow Editor” many of the pictures were missing. I was able to reconnect the pictures in the “Organizer” but they are still missing in the “Slideshow Editor”. It appears that the pictures that are missing are all from one windows folder. Another folder contents are fine.
FYI:
For some reason the pictures had shown up as linked to my external drive… where I have my backup files.
I did get them all linked (reconnected) in the Organizer to my C drive but they still do not show up in the “Slideshow Editor”. I did change (in windows) the file location of these files to get the project better reorganized. That probably kicked off the disconnect in the first place.
Is there some way to get all of these pictures in the “Slideshow Editor” reconnected? It is going to take about 5 hours of work to redo this project if I can not reconnect to these files. Since it was so easy in the Organizer it seems like there should be a way to do this in the “Slideshow Editor”.
I am using “Windows XP” and “Photoshop Elements 8”.
Thanks for any help you can provide!

I know i can do that... the point is i do not want to spend 5 more hours rebuilding the project.
What you are suggesting is just that... starting over.
I would like to correct the problem in the "Slideshow Editor".

Photoshop Elements 13 Slideshow Editor Sucks

I just upgraded from version 11 and I am VERY, VERY disappointed with the slideshow editing capability. I've been a loyal PSE user for many years and have loved the creative control with the slideshow editor. Version 13's slideshows are pitiful. There is no way to add pan and zoom individually, can't add music and fit to slides, can't add blank slides and text for titles, can't change transition effects, etc. What were the developers thinking? Can I downgrade to version 12? I purchased the software at Best Buy.

I am getting extremely frustrated with Adobe ---- one more time. My slide show in 13 does not function beyond allowing me to select a theme. Once selected, nothing happens other than returning me to the organizer screen. I spent a wasted hour on Adobe chat being informed that they are only trained for download issues and essentially know nothing about slideshows in 13
So with no help.... I will have to give up the slideshow functionality unless someone with knowledge can reply here to get it working. I believe it worked a month ago when I first tried it but now it has nothing .... no preview nada. . Looks like I am out of luck.

Cannot see my iTunes Library in the Aperture 3.12 slideshow editor ('07 iMac 4GB Ram)

Cannot see my iTunes Library in the Aperture 3.12 slideshow editor ('07 iMac 4GB Ram)
How can it be missing? I have iTunes and it works fine but I cannot see my iTunes library when creating the slideshow

Where are you looking? First you are selecting the music menu:
Then you select the pulldown:
Finally what shows here:

Missing Functionality: Dunning Wizard - We need table CRD1

Hello,
Missing Functionality: Dunning Wizard - We need table CRD1 in the dunning PLD templates!!!
This Workaround is impossible.
As a workaround I suggest to store this information in the UDFs that you would create on the OCRD table that is exposed in the dunning PLD templates.

keine Antwort ist auch eine Antwort

MISSING FUNCTIONALITY-The field "VatIdUnCmp" is not exposed in DI API & DTW

The field "VatIdUnCmp" (Unified Federal Tax ID) is not exposed by the
DI API and therefore not available in DTW.
This is a missing functionality.
In order to have this non-legal requirement, as request in the note 1028874, I send this development request
Thanks for your cooperation.
Fabio Fambrini

Maybe check here:
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/c5f5dbcc-0a01-0010-5d82-f25f2bee715e
HTH,
Frank

Disable Wizard (limited functionality) under Analysis Editor Preference Tab In OBIEE

Hai Experts
I want to disable this option(Disable Wizard (limited functionality) under Analysis Editor Preference Tab) for all users globally.
This option should not appear in Preference tab of OBIEE
Regards
Saurabh Anand

Hi,
It is a standard application privilege you can find and set under "Administration" -> "Manage Privileges":

Word Wrap functionality in HTML Editor

Hi,
Is their any configuration to enable the word wrap functionality in HTML Editor.
Best Regards,
Ajay

Hi Priyaranjan,
you need to use modules for that. The below link explains step by step a sample for word wrapping in an analysis item.
http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/a0f7d724-c0f0-2d10-828f-be249d59b5c3?QuickLink=index&…
Regards
Yasemin...

Packaging data is not saved in document draft (missing functionality)

Dear all,
Packaging data, usually typed with delivery note, is not saved together with Delivery Note draft (No matter the draft is saved manually or automatically by approval procedure).
I have tested on SBO 2005B latest patch, 2007B latest patch, and 8.8 version, they all do not save packaging data in draft.
The draft related tables for packaging (DRF7, DRF8) are already existed in SBO, I encourage to get this missing functionality back.
My customers are highly needed for this function for better operation flow.
It would be appreciated if this request could be implemented in the near future patch.
Thanks in advance

Have also just discovered that this functionality is missing, although we were going to be using it when saving an AR Invoice as Draft. This is a major hole and is going to cause a big issue for a current implementation where this method was going to be used to create 'Split Deliveries' without making the account postings and allow Despatch paperwork for the Shipping company to be printed. The solution was going to be extremely simple, but now potentially is going to result in a substantial SDK development.
It would be useful to know whether there is any likelihood that it will be resolved in the near future, i.e. in a patch for 2007A SP1 or 8.8.

Mail for Exchange Missing Functions E71 v E72

Hi All,
So I have been using an E71 with Mail for Exhcange for some time now and find it is very good.
However
I have an E72 with Mail for Exhcange already installed on the device BUT it clearly has missing functions whihc I had on the previous version on Mail fo Exchangeo n the E71.
These are
Comp Directory - Very useful for looking up contacts details from the GAB
View Log in Mail for Exchange. This is useful to see what the error is for a reason why the device may not be syncing with the MS Exchange Server.
Full resync in mail for Exchange. This again useful for support as other users will tell you that if the two systems have got their wires twisted, a full resync can fix the problem!
What version of the software do I have? Helps for future support and upgrades.
So Mr Nokia Software Developer. When can we have these functions added? Do we have to drop this software tool and device....
MODERATOR'S NOTE:
We have edited your post. Please be advised that feedback on Nokia devices are accepted in the forum provided that they are written in an acceptable manner such as tone and the choice of words.

As far as the version number goes - it's not a misprint, it's just they way Nokia numbering scheme works. build 2.09 is version 2.9. Similarly in Nokia Maps build 3.04 is called version 3.4... go figure.
Lumia 920, Lumia 800
Nokia N8-00 (NAM, Product Code: 059C8T6), Symbian Belle, Type RM-596, 111.030.0609
Nokia 5800 XpressMusic (NAM, Product Code: 0577454) Software v51.2.007, Type RM-428

OWB bugs, missing functionality and the future of OWB

I'm working with OWB for some time now and there are a lot of rough edges to discover. Functionality and stability leave a lot to be desired. Here's a small and incomplete list of things that annoy me:
Some annoying OWB bugs (OWB 10g 10.1.0.2.0):
- The debugger doesn't display the output parameters of procedures called in pre-mapping processes (displays nothing, treats values as NULL). The mapping itself works fine though.
- When calling selfmade functions within an expression OWB precedes the function call with a constant "Functions." which prevents the function from being executed and results in an error message
- Occasionally OWB cannot open mappings and displays an error message (null pointer exception). In this case the mapping cannot be opened anymore.
- Occasionally when executing mappings OWB doesn't remember changes in mappings even when the changes were committed and deployed
- When using aggregators in mappings OWB scrambles the order of the output attributes
- The deployment of mappings sometimes doesn't work. After n retries it works without having changed anything in the mapping
- When recreating an external table directly after dropping the table OWB recreates the external table but always displays both an error message and a success message.
- In Key Lookups the screen always gets garbled when selecting an attribute as a join condition
- Usage of constants results in aborts in the debugger
- When you reconcile a table used in a key lookup the lookup condition sometimes changes. OWB seems to remember only the position of the lookup condition attribute but not the name.
- In the process of validating a mapping often changes in the mapping get lost and errors occur like 'Internal Errors' or 'Null Pointer Exceptions'.
- When you save the definition of external tables OWB always adds 2 whitespace columns to the beginning of all the lines following 'ORGANISATION EXTERNAL'. If you save a lot of external table definitions you get files with hundreds of leading whitespaces.
Poor or missing functionality:
- No logging on the level of single records possible. I'd like the possibility to see the status of each single record in each operator like using 'verbose data' in PowerCenter
- The order of the attributes cannot be changed. This really pisses me off expecially if operators like the aggregator scramble the order of attributes.
- No variables in expressions possible
- Almost unusable lookup functionality (no cascading lookups, no lookup overrides, no unconnected lookups, only equal condition in key lookups)
- No SQL overrides in soruces possible
- No mapplets, shared containers or any kind a reusable transformations
- No overview functionality for mappings. Often it's very hard to find a leftover operator in a big mapping.
- No copy function for attributes
- Printing functionality is completely useless
- No documentation functionality for mappings (reports)
- Debugger itself needs debugging
- It's very difficult to mark connections between attributes of different operations. It's almost impossible to mark a group of connections without marking connections you don't want to mark.
I really wonder which of the above bugs and mssing functionality 'Paris' will address. From what I read about 'Paris' not many if at all. If Oracle really wants to be a competitor (with regard to functionality) to Informatica, IBM/Ascential etc. they have a whole lot of work to do or purchase Informatica or another of the leading etl tool
vendors.
What do you think about OWB? Will it be a competitor for the leading etl tools or just a cheap database add on and become widely used like SAB BW not for reasons of technology or functionality but because it's cheap?
Looking forward to your opinions.
Jörg Menker

Thanks to you two for entertaining my thoughts so far. Let me respond to you latest comments.
Okay, lets not argue which one is better.. when a tool is there .. then there are some reasons to be there...But the points raised by Jorg and me are really very annoying. Overall I agree with both yours and Jorg's points (and I did not think it was an argument...merely sharing our observations with each other (;^)
The OWB tool is not as mature as Informatica. However, Informatica has no foothold in the database engine itself and as I mentioned earlier, is still "on the outside looking in..." The efficiency and power of set-based activity versus row-based activity is substantial.
Looking at it from another way lets take a look at Microstrategy as a way of observing a technical strategy for product development. Microstrategy focused on the internals (the engine) and developed it into the "heavy-lifting" tool in the industry. It did this primarily by leveraging the power of the backend...the database and the hosting server. For sheer brute force, it was champion of the day. It was less concerned with the pretty presentation and more concerned with getting the data out of the back-end so the user didn't have to sit there for a day and wait. Now they have begun to focus on the presentation part.
Likewise this seems to be the strategy that Oracle has used for OWB. It is designed around the database engine and leverages the power of the database to do its work. Informatica (probably because it needs to be all things to all people) has tended to view the technical offerings of the database engine as a secondary consideration in its architectural approach and has probably been forced to do so more now that Oracle has put themselves in direct competition with Informatica. To do otherwise would make their product too complex to maintain and more vendor-specific.
I am into the third data warehousing/data migration project and my previous two have been on Informatica (3 years on it).I respect your experience and your opinions...you are not a first timer. The tasks we have both had to solve and how we solved them with these tools are not necessarily the same. Could be similar in instances; could be quite different.
So the general tendency is to evaluate the tool and try to see how things that were needed to be done in my previous projects can be done with this tool. I am afraid to say .. I am still not sure how these can be implemented in OWB. The points raised by us are probably the fall out of this deficiency.One observation that I would make is that in my experience, calls to the procedural language in the database engine have tended to perform very poorly with Informatica. Informatica's scripting language is week. Therefore, if you do not have direct usability of a good, strong procedural language to tackle some complicated tasks, then you will be in a pickle when the solution is not well suited to a relational-based approach. Informatica wants you to do most things outside of the database (in the map primarily). It is how you implement the transformation logic. OWB is built entirely around the relational, procedural, and ETL components in the Oracle database engine. That is what the tool is all about.
If cost is the major factor for deciding a tool then OWB stands far ahead...Depends entirely on the client and the situation. I have implemented solutions for large companies and small companies. I don't use a table saw to cut cake and I don't use a pin knife to fall trees. Right tool for the right job.
...thats what most managers do .. without even looking how in turn by selecting such a tool they make the life tough for the developers.Been there many times. Few non-technical managers understand the process of tool evaluation and selection and the value a good process adds to the project. Nor do they understand the implications of making a bad choice (cost, productivity, maintainability).
The functionality of OWB stands way below Informatica.If you are primarily a GUI-based implementer that is true. However, I have often found that when I have been brought in to fix performance problems with Informatica implementations that the primary problem is usually with the way that the developer implemented it. Too often I have found that the developer understands how to implement logic in the GUI component (the Designer/Maps and Sessions) with a complete lack of understanding of how all this activity will impact load performance (they don't understand how the database engine works.) For example, a strong feature in Informatica is the ability to override the default SQL statement generated by Informatica. This was a smart design decision on Informatica's part. I have frequently had to go into the "code" and fix bad joins, split up complex operations, and rip out convoluted logic to get the maps to perform within a reasonable load window. Too often these developers are only viewing the problem through the "window" of the tool. They are not stepping back and look at the problem in the context of the overall architecture. In part Informatica forces them to do this. Another possible factor is they probably don't know better.
"One tool...one solution"
Microstrategy until recently had been suffering from that same condition of not allowing the developer to create the actual query). OWB engineers need to rethink their strategy on overriding the SQL.
The functionality of OWB stands way below Informatica.In some ways yes. If you do a head-to-head comparison of the GUI then yes. In other ways OWB is better (Informatica does not measure up when you compare it with all of the architectural features that the Oracle database engine offers). They need to fix the bugs and annoyances though.
.. but even the GUI of Informatica is better than OWB and gives the developer some satisfaction of working in it.Believe me I feel your pain. On the other hand, I have suffered from Informatica bugs. Ever do a port from one database eingine to another just to have it convert everything into multi-byte? Ever have it re-define your maps to parallel processing threads when you didn't ask it to?
Looking at the technical side of things I can give you one fine example ... there is no function in Oracle doing to_integer (to_number is there) but Informatica does that ... Hmm-m-m...sorry, I don't get the point.
The style of ETL approach of Informatica is far more appealing.I find it unnecessarily over-engineered.
OWB has two advantages : It is basically free of cost and it has a big brother in Oracle.
It is basically free of cost...When you are another "Microsoft", you can throw your weight around. The message for Informatica is "don't bite the hand that feeds you." Bad decisions at the top.
Regards,
Dan Phillips

Missing Function Modules - EWA_MAIN_BUSINESS_HOURS & READ_STAMP

Hi Gurus,
When i am generating EWA for system in Solution Manager, i am getting the error
under Service Preparation
- Missing Function Modules
1. EWA_MAIN_BUSINESS_HOURS
2. READ_STAMP
*In the satellite system,tcode-sdccn*
Below are the errors:
1) EWA_MAIN_BUSINESS_HOURS : no matching interface found
function module not found
EWA_MAIN_BUSINESS_HOURS : funcname /SDF/MAIN_BUSINESS_HOURS , module 000156
2) READ_RFC_LIST : # of imp params in funcmod < # of imp params in mod 000152
READ_RFC_LIST : inconsistency in # of imp params found for mod 000152
READ_RFC_LIST : non-default imp param IF_ANONYMIZE is not passed to mod 000152
READ_STAMP : no matching interface found
function module not found
READ_STAMP : funcname /BDL/READ_STAMP , module 000153
Can Anybody help me to resolve this issue.
Regards,
Ashok

The modules EWA_MAIN_BUSINESS_HOURS, READ_STAMP and READ_RFC_LIST are supplied with the next version of ST-PI, which is currently scheduled to be released for customers on December 15. I can only ask you to ignore the error until after the next version of ST-PI has been installed on the system.
Please be informed that the errors are not critical and will disappear
by installing the latest ST-PI which will be release around december the
15th 2008.
Edited by: Felipe Pitta on Dec 2, 2008 12:22 PM

Camera Raw 6.6 missing functions

I use PSE 10 with Camera Raw 6.6. It appears to be missing functions such as the paint brush and the ability to mask. I've tried downloading it again, but the additional functions did not reappear. Any suggestions?

Masking is only available in conjunction with sharpening under the detail tab. Hold down the alt key whist dragging the making slider to see how sharpening will be applied to edges.
There is no adjustment brush tool available in the Elements version of camera raw. It’s only available in CS6 or Lightroom.

Slideshow Editor

How do you find the slideshow editor? I have selected images, set up slide show. In the split view screen I do not have the controls on the right side such as export on the right top (as shown in the manual) I do not have the buttons on the bottom right of the screen (which i believe turns on the editor). It does not appear in any drop down menu that I can find. I have selected the images and it plays. The controls in the left side (task bar) are there as shown in the manual, the controls are not on the right top or bottom. Can you help. Thanks.

There's a feature that allows you to see the Slideshow album as you would any other album so that you can work on the images. You may have that button checked.
!http://dlsphoto.com/a3SSview.jpg!
DLS

PS8 Win Slideshow editor existing sound caption ignored

I have a slide with a sound caption. It plays fine from thumbnail view by clicking on the thumbnail speaker icon and from the property panel speaker icon and also in the full screen view in a slideshow but it is ignored when I try to create a slideshow with the slideshow editor and play it. I have checked the box in Slideshow preference for include audio caption as naration but when I play slideshow it doesn't play either with/without music background. When I click on the mike icon on Extras bar, there is 00:00:00 time shown for the caption. I can record a new audio for the slideshow and that works fine but I want to play the existing audio clip/caption that I can play in a full screen slideshow. If I record a new clip and click box to save narration as audio caption, it replaces my old audio
Anyone have idea of how to make work or is this a bug.

I think that it is a bug and I suspect that it also existed in some previous versions.
My general observation is that Adobe is not spending much effort (or perhaps no effort) on either the slide show creation or on audio captions. So my observation is that this problem you are experiencing has "double jeopardy".
If you want to experiment - you could try
1-- first makeng a copy of the audio file that now contains the photo associated caption for safe keeping: place it in a folder structure outside of Elements
2-- make an audio file of the same lengh by recording from within the slide show editor while positioned on that photo
3-- copy the contents of the audio file that you copied in step 1 and replace the current contents of the audio file created in step 2
Will this work? I don't really know, but if you do want to try we could discuss further. Initially I am not really sure if you want to take the choice of "save narration as audio clip" in step 2 - I think perhaps NOT.
Also I am curious, do you have any previous versions of Photoshop Elements installed? If yes, was the caption associated with the photo file recorded in a previous version of PSE or was it recorded on your camera with its associate photo file?

Missing functions in Slideshow Editor?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for