Missing Items list returns wrong results

Hi All,
Have an issue whereby items are included on the missing items list report which show no consignment value and a positive available value...
I.e. Item A is showing on the list with:
In stock 30
Committed 1
Available 29
Anyone ever come across this?
Many Thanks,
Matt

Hi Guys,
I think the issue is more to do with the fact that the report is picking the items up even though it has a positive value in the available field, the consignment field seems to be correct.
This is happening for a lot of items, even for items where there is no data in either the consignment or available fields.
The version is 8.8 PL14.
Thanks,
Matt

Similar Messages

Missing Items List

In purchasing reports window for the open items list reports from the dropdown menu if you the select the "missing items " you get a report for the items which are in negative stock values.What does field consignment mean in this report?
Regards
Louis

Hi Buddy,
In the Open Items List (Reports -> Sales and Purchasing -> Open items
List),items appear in 'Missing Items List' when the 'Available' stock is
negative. The available stock is displayed in the Item Master Data ->
Stock tab.
When the 'Available' figure (Inventory - Item Master Data - Stock Tab)
falls below zero the item is visible in the missing items.
The consignment field is visible in the Item Master Data - Stock tab.
If it is not visible go to Tools - Form Settings and select the
'Visible' check box for the field.) If this field has a value then it
will be visible when the item appears in the Open Items List.
The figure which appears in the 'Consignment' column is a calculation
field, based on the sum of all open deliveries(where the delivery
increases the negative 'Available' stock)/Released Production orders -
open returns.
Hope the above information can be useful for you.
Best Regards,
Tim

Please Help Urgent:Fast Search returning wrong result sets

Hi All,
We are facing below issue with fast search.
Currently in My project when we are searching for a phrase it is returning wrong result sets.
For example if we search for “Endura”, It is returning documents related to
Endura as well as Centura.
But the expected results are only Endura documents.
When we look in to the documents we didn’t find the search term (“Endura” ) either inside document content or in its meta data.
In order to resolve the issue we tried the below steps
1-
We manually edited and saved the document, to ensure the appropriate Guid association to metadata.
2-
Index reset
3-
Full crawl
But no luck so far.
Please help.Thanks in advance.
Regards
Subrat

Subrat,
This may be related to spellchecking or may be synonym. Spellcheck is based on indexed terms.
The best test would be to run the queries from qrserver (13280) and then look at the spellcheck query transformations. If spellchecking is not doing it, then you must have a synonym setup .Check your keyword/synonyms from the SharePoint side.

[HELP] AGO function return wrong result

Hi, i try to implement ago function in OBIEE, but the result is not as expected. Please help me to configure Time Dimension to get this work.
My case:
- I have a time dimension with this configuration:
[http://i264.photobucket.com/albums/ii176/necrombi/NEO/1-1.png]
Time Hierarchy: Total > Year > Quarter > Month > Day
Year:
Primary key: Calendar_year_cal_year_code
Chronological key: Does not define
Quarter:
Primary key: Calendar_quarter_description
Chronological key: Does not define
Month:
Primary key: Calendar_month_description
Chronological key: Calendar_month_description
Day:
Primary key: Dimension_key
Chronological key: Day_day_code
My ago function: AGO(expression, mywh.D_qn_thoigianDim."month", 1)
I do not understand why i get this wrong results:
[http://i264.photobucket.com/albums/ii176/necrombi/NEO/2.png]
Does anyone know how to solve this?
Edited by: 864451 on Jun 8, 2011 5:11 AM

Hi, thanks for your reply.
I implemented Time dimension with your recommend, and have time dimension like this:
Time Hierarchy: Total > Year > Quarter > Month > Day
Year:
Primary key: Calendar_year_start_date
Chronological key: Calendar_year_start_date
Quarter:
Primary key: Calendar_quarter_start_date
Chronological key: Calendar_quarter_start_date
Month:
Primary key: Calendar_month_start_date
Chronological key: Calendar_month_start_date
Day:
Primary key: Day
Chronological key: Dimension_key
And Ago function works fine with month level: AGO(expression, mywh.D_qn_thoigianDim."month", n)
But return sum result of 12 month with: AGO(expression, mywh.D_qn_thoigianDim."year", 1)
In my case, i just use AGO(expression, mywh.D_qn_thoigianDim."month", 12) to get year ago value. But i still don't understand clearly about OBIEE Time Serries functions.
Thanks,
Dung Nguyen

Spotlight returns wrong results

After installing Yosemite on my MacBook Pro, I tried to use Spotlight on some simple searches, with startling results. For example, I looked for Spotlight help...and a Word for Mac file opened. I recognize that Spotlight scours my Mac for material, but I do not understand why it would open a file that has nothing to do with the search terms.
Can anyone hazard a guess about what may be happening?

Did it and it worked to add _spotlight to the ACLs but Spotlight still return blank results on AFP clients...
Do you know what should be the permissions on the .spotlight-V100 folder?
Spotlight works on the servers so the index is fine. It's the AFP clients that can't read it properly or don't get all the data from it.

Simple query with like return wrong result

Hi,
I run simple query with like.
If I use parameter I get wrong results.
If I use query without parameter results are ok.
My script:
ALTER SESSION SET NLS_SORT=BINARY_CI;
ALTER SESSION SET NLS_COMP=LINGUISTIC;
-- drop table abcd;
create table abcd (col1 varchar2(10));
INSERT INTO ABCD VALUES ('122222');
insert into abcd values ('111222');
SELECT * FROM ABCD WHERE COL1 LIKE :1; -- wrong result with value 12%
COL1
122222
*111222*
select * from abcd where col1 like '12%'; -- result ok
COL1
122222
I use Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.1.0 - 64bit Production
and query run in Oracle SQL Developer 3.1.07.

Hi,
welcome to the forum.
When you put some code please enclose it between two lines starting with {noformat}{noformat}
i.e.:
{noformat}{noformat}
SELECT ...
{noformat}{noformat}
You should specify exactly how you run your code.
If I run this statement in SQL Plus:SQL> ALTER SESSION SET NLS_SORT=BINARY_CI;
Session altered.
SQL> ALTER SESSION SET NLS_COMP=LINGUISTIC;
Session altered.
SQL>
SQL> -- drop table abcd;
SQL> create table abcd (col1 varchar2(10));
Table created.
SQL>
SQL> INSERT INTO ABCD VALUES ('122222');
1 row created.
SQL> insert into abcd values ('111222');
1 row created.
SQL>
SQL> SELECT * FROM ABCD WHERE COL1 LIKE :1;
SP2-0552: Bind variable "1" not declared.
SQL>
I got this error. So I wonder how you set value 12%
Please specify exactly how you run your test as we cannot reproduce your problem.
Regards.
Al

Query returning wrong results - Help required.

Hi All,
I am having a query in which I have 10 records, 5 with stop time 1 and 5 with stop time 2.
I have a scenario in which, I need to calculate the maximum,minimum for the records
with stop time 1 and 2.
What I did is, I selected all the 10 records using for loop. Within the loop
I am trying to find the maximum and minimum. It is giving me wrong results.
Please help me. My code is follows
declare
     v_p1_min_stop_tm     number;
     v_p1_max_stop_tm     number;
     v_p2_min_stop_tm     number;
     v_p2_max_stop_tm     number;
begin
     for i in(
          select
               stop_tm
          from
               sample_stop
          where
               map_nbr = 16645 and
               stop_dt = '05-sep-08'
     )loop
          if i.stop_tm = 1 then
               select
                    min(i.stop_tm),
                    max(i.stop_tm)
               into
                    v_p1_min_stop_tm,
                    v_p1_max_stop_tm
               from
                    dual;
          elsif i.stop_tm = 2 then
               select
                    min(i.stop_tm),
                    max(i.stop_tm)
               into
                    v_p2_min_stop_tm,
                    v_p2_max_stop_tm
               from
                    dual;
          end if;
     end loop;
     dbms_output.put_line('minimum p1 stop time : '|| v_p1_min_stop_tm);
     dbms_output.put_line('maximum p1 stop time : '|| v_p1_max_stop_tm);
     dbms_output.put_line('minimum p2 stop time : '|| v_p2_min_stop_tm);
     dbms_output.put_line('maximum p2 stop time : '|| v_p2_max_stop_tm);
end;
My o/p is :
Minimum P1 stop time : 523
Maximum P1 stop time : 523
Minimum P2 stop time : 719
Maximum P2 stop time : 719
Here how can I make the data as two sets, one set with stop time 1 and
other with stop time 2.
Regards
Raghu

If the data type of stop_tm is varchar then try following
declare
     v_p1_min_stop_tm number;
     v_p1_max_stop_tm number;
     v_p2_min_stop_tm number;
     v_p2_max_stop_tm number;
begin
     for i in(select stop_tm from sample_stop
          where
               map_nbr = 16645 and
               stop_dt = '05-sep-08'
          )loop
     if i.stop_tm = 1 then
          select min(to_number(i.stop_tm)), max(to_number(i.stop_tm))
               into v_p1_min_stop_tm,v_p1_max_stop_tm
          from
               dual;
     elsif i.stop_tm = 2 then
          select
               min(to_number(i.stop_tm)),     max(to_number(i.stop_tm))
               into
               v_p2_min_stop_tm,v_p2_max_stop_tm
          from
               dual;
     end if;
end loop;
dbms_output.put_line('minimum p1 stop time : '|| v_p1_min_stop_tm);
dbms_output.put_line('maximum p1 stop time : '|| v_p1_max_stop_tm);
dbms_output.put_line('minimum p2 stop time : '|| v_p2_min_stop_tm);
dbms_output.put_line('maximum p2 stop time : '|| v_p2_max_stop_tm);
end;
/ Regards
Singh

WebService returning wrong result

Hi All,
I am trying to write a webservice but somehow getting wrong result. Not sure where i am going wrong. I am seeing following in logs -
Request envelop -
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<soapenv:Envelope xmlns:soapenv="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
<soapenv:Body>
<Multiply xmlns="http://tempuri.org/">
<A xsi:type="xsd:float" xmlns="">40.0</A>
<B xsi:type="xsd:float" xmlns="">20.0</B>
</Multiply>
</soapenv:Body>
</soapenv:Envelope>
Response -
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><soap:Envelope xmlns:soap="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"><soap:Body><MultiplyResponse xmlns="http://tempuri.org/"><MultiplyResult>0</MultiplyResult></MultiplyResponse></soap:Body></soap:Envelope>
This is a webservice available online url - http://samples.gotdotnet.com/quickstart/aspplus/samples/services/MathService/VB/MathService.asmx?op=Multiply
Please HELP!!! Thanks in advance.
-Tarun

send this and write the results...
<SOAP-ENV:Envelope xmlns:SOAP-ENV="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" xmlns:SOAP-ENC="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/encoding/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema">
     <SOAP-ENV:Body>
          <m:Multiply xmlns:m="http://tempuri.org/">
               <m:A>3.14159E0</m:A>
               <m:B>3.14159E0</m:B>
          </m:Multiply>
     </SOAP-ENV:Body>
</SOAP-ENV:Envelope>

HTMLDB_ITEM.SELECT_LIST function returns wrong result in 1.6?

Look at following select statements:
1. select flows_010600.htmldb_item.select_list(1,null,'Full;F,Read;R,No;N',
'','YES',null,'Derived','f01_'||TO_CHAR(ROWNUM,'FM0000'),'D')
from dual
<label for="f01_0001" class="hideMe508">D</label><select name="f01" id="f01_0001"><option value="">Derived</option><option value="F" >Full</option><option value="R" >Read</option><option value="N" >No</option><option value="" selected="selected"></option></select>
2.select flows_010500.htmldb_item.select_list(1,null,'Full;F,Read;R,No;N',
'','YES',null,'Derived','f01_'||TO_CHAR(ROWNUM,'FM0000'),'D')
from dual
<label for="f01_0001" class="hideMe508">D</label><select name="f01" id="f01_0001"><option value="">Derived<option value="F" >Full<option value="R" >Read<option value="N" >No</select>
If selected value of list is null version 1.6 call adds extra item without display value. Version 1.5 call works fine. Is it a bug or implied behavior?

Hi Alexey,
This is the intended behavior; in your htmldb_item.select_list call, you are setting the current value to NULL. This is the value shown in 1.6. In 1.5 the first value from your list of values was shown. This behavior wasn't appropriate in most cases. If for example you had a tabular form with a select list and the values retrieved from the database were not part of the list of values used for the select list, it would basically default the select list to the first value from your list of values. If you then saved your tabular form, you would have ended up with the wrong data. Now the select list will show the actual value from the database, if it's not part of the list of values. Otherwise it will show the correct display value. If in your case this is not the behavior you need, you can simply turn that off by modifying your query to:
select flows_010600.htmldb_item.select_list(1,null,'Full;F,Read;R,No;N',
'','YES',null,'Derived','f01_'||TO_CHAR(ROWNUM,'FM0000'),'D','NO')
from dual
I simply added another attribute which is called p_show_extra and set it to 'NO'. Here's the full specification of the function:
function select_list (
p_idx in number,
p_value in varchar2 default null,
p_list_values in varchar2 default null,
p_attributes in varchar2 default null,
p_show_null in varchar2 default 'NO',
p_null_value in varchar2 default '%null%',
p_null_text in varchar2 default '%',
p_item_id in varchar2 default null,
p_item_label in varchar2 default null,
p_show_extra in varchar2 default 'YES'
) return varchar2
Hope this helps,
Marc

Directory search returns wrong results when you modify the view

Hello,
I have a custom list used a staff directory. This is SharePoint 2013. I am using a search box where users can type in names to find people.
When I add or remove a record in the list or modify the view and then I search for my name, all search results appear. It once just returned 1 record for my name, but now it returns all 100 records in the list.
How can I fix this?
Thanks,
Paul
Paul

Hi Paul,
Did you search in the SharePoint list or in SharePoint search center?
Could you provide more details about how you created the custom list?
Please try to enable Server Render as editing the page->Edit Web Part-> Miscellaneous, compare the result.
Please operate in other lists and in other site collections and test whether this issue occurs.
Please start a full crawl in Central Administration -> Manage service application -> Search service application -> Content Sources and test whether this issue occurs.
Could you check if it exists error in ULS log after you failed to search in the SharePoint list.
Best Regards,
Dean Wang
TechNet Community Support
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help, and unmark the answers if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact
[email protected]

Simple query returns wrong results in Sql 2012

On my Windows 8 box running Sql 2012 11.0.3128, this query returns an IncludeCount of 0 and an ExcludeCount of 1.
On my Windows 7 box running Sql 2008 10.50.2550 this query returns an IncludeCount of 3 and an ExcludeCount of 1, which is correct.
In short, it runs properly on these versions of OS and Sql's:
Windows 2008 R2 + Sql 10.50.2550
Windows 2008 R2 + Sql 10.50.4000
Windows 2012 SP1 + Sql 11.0.3000
Windows 7 + Sql 11.0.2100
And gives incorrect results on these OS's and Sql's (so far, tested):
Windows 8 Enterprise + Sql 11.0.3128
Windows 2008 R2 + Sql 10.50.2550
I wondered if anyone else can reproduce this? I can't figure out the magic combination of OS and SQL version this breaks on.
In all scenarios, the resulting @filters table is populated correctly, and the [Include] column is properly set to a 1 or a 0, so why aren't the other variables being properly set?
If I change the [ID] column to NONCLUSTERED, it works fine, too. It doesn't matter if @filters is a TVP or a temp table or an actual table, same (incorrect) results in each case.
DECLARE @filters TABLE([ID] bigint PRIMARY KEY, [Include] bit)
DECLARE @excludecount int = 0
DECLARE @includecount int = 0
DECLARE @id bigint
INSERT INTO @filters ([ID])
VALUES (1), (3), (4), (-7)
UPDATE @filters SET
    @id = [ID],
    @includecount = @includecount + (CASE WHEN @id > 0 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END),
    @excludecount = @excludecount + (CASE WHEN @id < 0 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END),
    [Include] = CASE WHEN @id > 0 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END,
    [ID] = ABS(@id)
SELECT @includecount as IncludeCount, @excludecount as ExcludeCount
SELECT * FROM @filters

What part is undocumented?
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms177523.aspx
The above link states I can update variables inside an UPDATE statement ...
But it does not say what the correct result of what you are trying to would be. Variable assignment in UPDATE only makes sense if the UPDATE hits one row. If the UPDATE matches several rows, which value you the variable is set to is not defined.
It gets even more complicated when you have the variable on both sides of the expression. But I'd say that the only two values that makes as the final value of @includecount 0. An UPDATE statement, like other DML statements in SQL, is logically defined
as all-at-once. There are no intermediate results. Therefore the only possible values are the initial value of @includecount plus the value of the CASE statement, which always should returns 0, since @id is NULL when the UPDATE statement starts to execute.
I'm afraid that what you have is nonsense from a language perspective, and the result is undefined. Whenever you get different results from a query depending on whether you have certain indexes in place, you know that the query is indeterministic. There
are certainly part of SQL that are indeterministic, for instance ORDER BY on a non-unique columns. But in this particular case you have also wandered out into the land that is also undefined.
I'm not sure what you are trying to achieve, but I can only advice you to go back to the drawing board.
Erland Sommarskog, SQL Server MVP, [email protected]

Context Type Search returning wrong results with "ME" in the SEARCH

CREATE TABLE "TEST"
id NUMBER(19) NOT NULL,
"TESTDATA" CLOB NOT NULL ENABLE
CREATE INDEX IX_testdata ON test (testdata) INDEXTYPE IS CTXSYS.CONTEXT ONLINE
PARAMETERS ('TRANSACTIONAL MEMORY 500M SYNC(ON COMMIT) section group ctxsys.xmlpathgroup')
PARALLEL 4
insert into test values (1, '<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<user>
<givenname>victor</fn>
<surname>frandenstein</sn>
</user>
select * from TEST
where
contains(testdata,
'me inpath(/user/givenname) &(victor inpath(/user/givenname))') > 0
This should not result in any results but it does show the record out.
What is it we have to do deal with the word "ME". It works fine for any other values.

Since "me" is a default stopword, searching for "me" and "Victor" is like just searching for "Victor", so it returns the row with "Victor" in it. If you want to be able to search for "me", then you need to either remove "me" from your existing ctxsys.default_stoplist using ctx_ddl.remove_stopword or specify another stoplist during index creation that does not contain me or an empty stoplist. You will need to drop and recreate your index after changing or modifying stoplists in order for the changes to take effect. Please see the demonstration below. I have added a couple of rows so that it is clearer what is and is not returned. You can check the token_text column of your dr$...$i index to see what it is tokenized, indexed, and searchable.
SCOTT@10gXE> -- test environment:
SCOTT@10gXE> CREATE TABLE "TEST"
2 (
3 id NUMBER(19) NOT NULL,
4 "TESTDATA" CLOB NOT NULL ENABLE
5 )
6 /
Table created.
SCOTT@10gXE> insert into test values (1, '<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
2 <user>
3 <givenname>victor</fn>
4 <surname>frandenstein</sn>
5 </user>
6 ')
7 /
1 row created.
SCOTT@10gXE> insert into test values (2, '<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
2 <user>
3 <givenname>me victor</fn>
4 <surname>frandenstein</sn>
5 </user>
6 ')
7 /
1 row created.
SCOTT@10gXE> insert into test values (3, '<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
2 <user>
3 <givenname>naren</fn>
4 <surname>frandenstein</sn>
5 </user>
6 ')
7 /
1 row created.
SCOTT@10gXE> exec ctx_ddl.create_section_group ('xmlpathgroup', 'PATH_SECTION_GROUP')
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SCOTT@10gXE> -- reproduction:
SCOTT@10gXE> CREATE INDEX IX_testdata ON test (testdata) INDEXTYPE IS CTXSYS.CONTEXT
2 PARAMETERS
3    ('TRANSACTIONAL MEMORY 500M
4       SYNC(ON COMMIT)
5       section group xmlpathgroup')
6 PARALLEL 4
7 /
Index created.
SCOTT@10gXE> SELECT token_text FROM dr$ix_testdata$i
2 /
TOKEN_TEXT
FRANDENSTEIN
NAREN
VICTOR
givenname
surname
user
6 rows selected.
SCOTT@10gXE> select * from TEST
2 where
3 contains(testdata,
4 'me inpath(/user/givenname) &(victor inpath(/user/givenname))') > 0
5 /
        ID
TESTDATA
         1
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<user>
<givenname>victor</fn>
<surname>frandenstein</sn>
</user>
         2
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<user>
<givenname>me victor</fn>
<surname>frandenstein</sn>
</user>
SCOTT@10gXE> -- solution:
SCOTT@10gXE> drop index ix_testdata
2 /
Index dropped.
SCOTT@10gXE> CREATE INDEX IX_testdata ON test (testdata) INDEXTYPE IS CTXSYS.CONTEXT
2 PARAMETERS
3    ('TRANSACTIONAL MEMORY 500M
4       SYNC(ON COMMIT)
5       section group xmlpathgroup
6       stoplist ctxsys.empty_stoplist')
7 PARALLEL 4
8 /
Index created.
SCOTT@10gXE> SELECT token_text FROM dr$ix_testdata$i
2 /
TOKEN_TEXT
FRANDENSTEIN
ME
NAREN
VICTOR
givenname
surname
user
7 rows selected.
SCOTT@10gXE> select * from TEST
2 where
3 contains(testdata,
4 'me inpath(/user/givenname) &(victor inpath(/user/givenname))') > 0
5 /
        ID
TESTDATA
         2
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<user>
<givenname>me victor</fn>
<surname>frandenstein</sn>
</user>
SCOTT@10gXE>

Query returning wrong result set

I am running the following query on 8.1.7 database. The query is
SELECT Y.*, TEVStatus.lEndStatusFlag ENDSTATUSFLAG
FROM
(SELECT ROWNUM RANK, X.* FROM (SELECT lExceptionID ID,
TEVException.sMonitorName MONNAME, sExcpStatus STATUS
FROM TEVException WHERE (TEVException.lExceptionID IN
(SELECT lExceptionID FROM TEVException WHERE
sUserName_AssignedTo = 'vadmin')) ORDER BY
TEVException.lExceptionID DESC) X)
Y, TEVStatus WHERE (Y.RANK > 0 AND Y.RANK < 0 + 51 + 1) AND
(STATUS = TEVStatus.sStatusName);
The result is
RANK ID MONNAME STATUS ENDSTATUSFLAG
51 29 Type09B Open 0
50 30 Type09A Open 0
49 31 Type09E Open 0
48 32 Type09F Open 0
47 33 Type09G Open 0
46 34 Type09I Open 0
45 35 Type09C Open 0
44 36 Type10A Open 0
43 37 Type04A Open 0
39 41 Type08A Open 0
38 42 Type08C Open 0
RANK ID MONNAME STATUS ENDSTATUSFLAG
37 43 Type10B Open 0
36 44 Type10E Open 0
35 45 Type10C Open 0
34 46 Type10F Open 0
33 47 Type10D Open 0
32 48 Type08B Open 0
31 49 Type04B Open 0
29 51 Type08D Open 0
28 52 Type11E Open 0
27 53 Type11A Open 0
26 54 Type11D Open 0
RANK ID MONNAME STATUS ENDSTATUSFLAG
25 55 Type11C Open 0
24 56 Type11B Open 0
23 57 Type12A Open 0
22 58 Type12B Open 0
21 59 Type12C Open 0
20 60 Type12E Open 0
19 61 Type12A Open 0
18 62 Type12B Open 0
17 63 Type12E Open 0
16 64 Type12C Open 0
15 65 Type12D Open 0
RANK ID MONNAME STATUS ENDSTATUSFLAG
14 66 Type12D Open 0
4 80 Type01A_Ravi Open 0
3 83 Type01A_Ravi Open 0
2 84 Type01A_Ravi Open 0
1 87 Type01A_Ravi Open 0
42 38 Type06E Closed 8500
41 39 Type06A Closed 8500
40 40 Type06B Closed 8500
30 50 Type06C Closed 8500
13 68 Type01A Closed 8500
12 69 Type01A Closed 8500
RANK ID MONNAME STATUS ENDSTATUSFLAG
11 70 Type01A Closed 8500
10 71 Type01A Closed 8500
9 72 Type01A Closed 8500
8 73 Type01A Closed 8500
7 75 Type01A Closed 8500
6 77 Type01A Closed 8500
5 78 Type01A Closed 8500
51 rows selected.
In the above result, the RANK is not sorted properly and I
expected ID in descending order. The table which I was querying
had only about 100 records. I ran the same query on a larger
record set and the result is fine. I get ID in descending order
which I was expecting.
Could someone please tell me whether any bug in this case or
something wrong in the query

Hi...
Took a quick look at tour SQL and....
SELECT Y.*
       , TEVStatus.lEndStatusFlag ENDSTATUSFLAG
    FROM ( SELECT ROWNUM RANK
                , X.*
             FROM ( SELECT lExceptionID ID
                         , TEVException.sMonitorName MONNAME
                         , sExcpStatus STATUS
                      FROM TEVException
                     WHERE ( TEVException.lExceptionID IN
                             ( SELECT lExceptionID
                                  FROM TEVException
                                WHERE sUserName_AssignedTo
                                      = 'vadmin'
                     ORDER BY TEVException.lExceptionID DESC
                  ) X
         ) Y
       , TEVStat us
   WHERE ( Y.RANK > 0
           AND
           Y.RANK < 0 + 51 + 1
     AND STATUS = TEVStatus.sStatusName ;
Should "FROM ( SELECT ROWNUM RANK" be "FROM ( SELECT ROWNUM,
RANK"?
RANK is a reserved word, an analytic function.
Is "ORDER BY TEVException.lExceptionID DESC" doing anything? I
would drop it..
Hope this helps. Good Luck.

MDX IIF returning wrong results

Dear All,
We are using MDX formulas with IIF statements.
We have found that if there is no figure on the first test of the MDX then no figure is returned.
Example MDX and data
IIF([CATEGORY] = [BUDGET],[599003BU],IIF([CATEGORY] = [ESTIMATE],[599003ES],IIF([CATEGORY] = [FORECAST],[599003FC],[599003AC])))
                    300     599003     599003BU     599003ES     599003FC     599003AC
                    Sales     Sales growth in %     Sales growth in %     Sales growth in %     Sales growth in %     Sales growth in %
ACTUAL     2008.JAN     Actual     JAN 2008     278,124.09               24.24     24.24     24.24
ACTUAL     2008.DEC     Actual     DEC 2008     3,713,534.23     4.99     12.33     4.99     4.99     4.99
In line 1 there is no data in 599003BU hence there is no data on the destination account. In line 2 there is data on 599003BU and hence data on the destination account.
We are using SAP BPC 5.1 on SQL Server 2005 SP3.
Any suggestions would be appreciated.
Regards,
Mark

Akim,
Thanks for your input. Your statement did not process as described. I have to put "[]" round the dimension and account id's.
What I have found is the following. If the process comes accross an empty value it stops working at that point.
I started with this statement. CASE [CATEGORY] WHEN [BUDGET] THEN [599003BU] WHEN [ACTUAL] THEN [599003AC] WHEN [ESTIMATE] THEN [599003ES] WHEN [FORECAST] THEN [599003ES] ELSE [599003AC] END
Where the MDX formula for 599003BU returns null. Then no value is put into 599003 even if there are values in the other accounts and the category is not BUDGET.
I have reordered the statement so that Budget is tested last I get figures for ACTUAL, ESTIMATE, and FORECAST.
CASE [CATEGORY] WHEN [ACTUAL] THEN [599003AC] WHEN [ESTIMATE] THEN [599003ES] WHEN [FORECAST] THEN [599003ES] WHEN [BUDGET] THEN [599003BU] ELSE [599003AC] END
This now returns more consistant results, though they are not 100% correct.
I am going to open a message on this issue.
Regards,
Mark

Union_all query returns wrong results

I have 6 individual queries that combine together using "union_all". If I run it, it returns 6084 records, see example 1.
Example 1:
sql1
union_all
sql2
unionl_all
sql3
sql6;
if I do it this way, example2, I get only 3821 records. Is there a bug in Oracle 11g? I select everything from 6084 records, I should get them all, correct?
Example 2:
select * from
sql1
union_all
sql2
unionl_all
sql3
sql6
note that I use "union_all" because the computer does not take it without the underscore.

user557594 wrote:
Your queries do not deal with thousand of rows. My queries worked ok before the upgrade to 11g. I just want to know if there is a bug related to union all in 11g.If you believe that you are encountering a bug, you really should be posting this over on Metalink (My Oracle Support). When you do, you'll want to specify at a minimum the 4 digit Oracle version you are using (11g could mean either of two major releases and a few different patchsets).
I'm sure if you search My Oracle Support, you'll find at least one bug in whatever version of 11g you're using that occurs when UNION ALL is used (though I'll wager that you need two or three other conditions to be true as well). If you open a ticket, however, Oracle Support can determine whether you are actually encountering an error and/or whether you've encountered any of the published bugs, an unpublished bug, or a new bug. Once you know that, Oracle Support may or may not have a patch for you.
Unfortunately, if you can't post a test case that would allow us to reproduce the problem locally, it's going to be hard for us to provide much assistance. Of course, Oracle Support will also need a reproducible test case, but they can probably help you work through the process of putting one together complete with sample data and a query plan.
Justin

Missing Items list returns wrong results

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for