Missing MLGN Segments

Hello,
we are using decentral warehousing.
When users are listing an article to a DC they often forget to add the decentral warehouse segment (MLGN) .
One of the consequence is that inbound deliveries IDOCs fail.
Whilst it is easy to figure out which MGLN segments are missing we didn't find any program or FM for creating this records in MLGN and avoid the usual material master maintenance.
Did anyone experience this issue and how can it be fixed?
thanks for your input
Olivier.

it is not really a field.. the user lists the article in a DC and then he should go to the bottom og the logistics DV view and go to warehouse management in order to create the decentral segment.
we would prefer a small ABAP runing periodically as corrective measure.
thanks for your input anyway

Similar Messages

TAX ASSESSMENT BASIS MISSING IN SEGMENT E1EDK04 FOR IDOC INVOIC

Hello,
Tax assesment basis is missing in segment E1EDK04 for IDOC INVOIC. In EDI messages,Tax assesment basis has to be sent in TAX segment together with VAT rate. When there is only one VAT rate this is not a problem as tax assessment basis is the total net amount (And we have it in the IDOC). On the other hand when there is more than one VAT rate in the invoice, we don't have in the IDOC the Tax assesment basis of each VAT rate.
Did someone experience this issue ? How did you handle it ?
Regards.
Eric.

Dear Eric
The latest pack available now for these components are (for PI 7.1)
SAP BASIS 7.11 support package 6
SAP HR 6.04 with Support Package 44
If you are in PI 7.0 then I suggest you download the latest patch from marketplace.
Sourabh

Outbound EDI missing envelope segment

Outbound EDI file is missing envelope segment (ISA,GS,GE AND IEA). Input xml is getting processed successfully. However, the outbound EDI is missing the envelope segment. My vendor says he needs envelope segement. What am I doing wrong? Thanks for your help.
Satya

Satya,
Does it still still use transaction set ecs to validate the input file? or, does B2B use .xsd for validating the input edi xml file?In case of EDI, it is ecs always which is used for translation and validation (if translation and validation is enabled in agreement). XSD is only used for proving integration with back-end middleware. You may validate it by providing ecs only as part of document definition and enabling validation & translation in the agreement.
Could this be the reason for not generating the envelope segment? The only reason why there is no envelope segments could be an invalid ecs.
You mentioned that our ecs file is not valid. However, all seems to work without any issue except for envelope segment.When I say invalid then it means improper structure of ecs and that's why I pointed you to refer the sample ecs which comes as part of installation itself. You may match your ecs with that sample ecs and easily figure out the differences. Oracle B2B is already pre-seeded with interchange and group ecs and hence transaction set ecs must not contain these two parts. It should have only transaction set (ST to SE) defined in it. In case you have any specific requirement then ONLY you should override interchange and group ecs at respective settings in document definition otherwise you should go ahead with pre-seeded (actually standard) Group and Interchange ecs files.
This document may be useful for you, if you have not gone through it yet -
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/testcontent/edi-cookbook-oracle-b2b-133194.pdf
Regards,
Anuj

Missing IDOC segment during invoice for specific user

Hi Experts,
While doing a post goods issue and generating an invoice, the idoc generated from this has missing segments, this only happens when using a spcecific RFC user name (with all authorizations enabled), however, when using an ordinary sap account, the idoc is created successully with no missing segments. Do you have any advide on what seems to be causing the issue? Any help is very much appreciated.
Thanks in advance.

yeah
u go to TCODE WE30 and give ur object name and enter.
then u will see all the segments related to ur object.
u can double click on each segment and see whethet it is mandatory or not.
regards
jai
please reward if helpful.

The Data is missing in Segment E1EDKA1

Hi,
We are using the message type ORDRSP & standared Process code SD10.When we created the sales order in SAP system the all segments are avilable for E1EDKA1.
The Data which passed to outbound IDOC onlt few segmnets of E1EDKA1 is avilable.e.g if we have totale 8 in sales order then in outbound idoc only 4 are avilable which is sap standared.our custom partner fuctions are not visible.
Please suggets what I am missing.
Regards
KK

Hi nisha,
Let me little bit clear abt this issue. Actually we r using a multiprovider for the reports in which there r 2 infocubes. One is actual n another is planned. the column keyfigures which were selected in the query were been written with some code in the transformation rule and at the same time these column keyfigures are using the object ficsper3 (linked to fiscper3). can yu plz go through this code and let me know.
Data: Yfisqtr    type /BIC/OIGBFISQTR,
          Yfiscper3 type /BI0/OIFISCPER3.
    Yfiscper3 = SOURCE_FIELDS-FISCPER+4(3).
    clear Yfisqtr.
If Yfiscper3 = '001' or Yfiscper3 = '002' or Yfiscper3 = '003'.
      concatenate SOURCE_FIELDS-FISCPER+0(4) '1' into Yfisqtr.
    elseif Yfiscper3 = '004' or Yfiscper3 = '005' or Yfiscper3 = '006'.
      concatenate SOURCE_FIELDS-FISCPER+0(4) '2' into Yfisqtr.
    elseif Yfiscper3 = '007' or Yfiscper3 = '008' or Yfiscper3 = '009'.
      concatenate SOURCE_FIELDS-FISCPER+0(4) '3' into Yfisqtr.
    elseif Yfiscper3 = '010' or Yfiscper3 = '011' or Yfiscper3 = '012'.
      concatenate SOURCE_FIELDS-FISCPER+0(4) '4' into Yfisqtr.
Thanks,
Jack

Missing E1KNVLM segment in DEBMDM IDOC TYPE

Dear Experts,
When we run mdmc transaction to create idocs for customer master data,
The debmdm idocs is geeting created with out E1KNVLM segment.
We need to retrive LICNR from the E1KNVLM, we are on ECC5.0,
Appreciate your valuable help.
Thanks and Regards.
Sravya.

Hi,
Check BD79( Creation of Rule) , is there any rule cretaed for this particulat segment .
At the same time check BD56 for any segments fileterd.
Revrt back if any issues,
regards,
Naveen

Missing IDOC Segment from RWB

Hi all,
I am experiencing an issue where <MESCOD> segment from ORDERS IDOC is not passed to target when sent from RWB. When sent from source system, everything processes correctly, but our test messages from RWB lose <MESCOD>IC</MESCOD> when they reach the target system.
Our interface mapping for this scenario involves both a message mapping and an ABAP mapping before it is processed to target.
Any ideas to why this issue is isolated to RWB? Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Kevin

Hi Swarup,
I meant to say that we are taking a message from sxmb_moni from the source and resending in RWB to test new changes. Therefore, it's an IDOC within XML tags as XML is declared. Every field processes correctly when doing this method except MESCOD. Why would every XML node process successfully except one?
Again, when passing this IDOC from source system, everything processes correctly.
Thanks,
Kevin

ME59 Purchase order outbound idoc header text missing in segment

Hi All,
When Purchase Order created via ME59 for third party vendor Outbound Idoc is created but Header Text of PO not copied into IDOC Segment.This Problem occurs when PO has sales order assignment.
Please Advice..
Thanks,
Vinod.

Hi Ankur,
I am not an expert in this area but I'm looking on an ORDERS05 iDoc where I have the following data for E1EDK14:
E1EDK14 014:
QUALF: 014
ORGID: [Purchasing organization ID]
E1EDK14 009:
QUALF: 009
ORGID: [Purchasing Group ID]
E1EDK14 013:
QUALF: 013
ORGID: [Purchase Order type, e.g. EC]
E1EDK14 011:
QUALF: 011
ORGID: [Company Code]
Hope this helps!
Regards,
Kristoffer

Photoshop no longer recognizes NEF files / won't open jpg files because of "missing marker segment"

I am running Photoshop CS6 on a 2013 iMac with OSX version 10.9.2.
1) As of today, Photoshop no longer recognizes NEF files. This has never happened before, and the files are coming from the same camera I've used for the past five years.
2) I receive the following message when I attempt to open a .jpg file "Could not complete your request because a JPEG marker segment length is too short (the file may be truncated or incomplete)."
This is also the first time this has happened, and happens with EVERY .jpg file I attempt to open.
3) Both of these errors ONLY happen when I am opening files located on the work server. I hit COMMAND K to connect to serveral work servers -- my work space, shared collaboration folder, and an image archive that was recently moved. If I grab the file that I want and transfer it to my desktop, and open it with Photoshop from there, it works fine.
I have run all updates.
I'm not sure if this is a Mac issue (with regard to accessing the work servers) or a Photoshop issue.
Any help is appreciated.
Thanks

Photoshop does "play nice" over networks, but seems to catch more OS and server bugs than other applications (mostly because we've added more error detection code over the years after dealing with many OS and server problems).

Incoming IDOC-Segment missing

Hi, Friends,
I have a strange problem.
The incoming IDOC in idx5 list miss a segment although the meta data is renewed.
Could sb. help?
Thanks and Reguards
Zhiping

Hi Krishna, Hi Jakub,
I tried both. But it remains.
Still strange is, the ALEAUD idoc with Z-Segment containd in E1PRTOB-Segment produced by the sending system contains some E1STATE segments. But the number of ALEAUD idocs recieved in IDX5 list is the number of the E1STATE segments in sending system. And every recieved ALEAUD idoc contains only one E1STATE-Segment
Why is it splitted? and where?
Thanks
Zhiping

WBBDLD05 Segment E1WBB13 missing

Hi All,
I am currently in process of Setting up new wholesale price lists, where in each pricelist represents a different country.
As required I have configured new company codes, reference sites,price list, partner profiles and performed article listing and extensions.
I have been been able to perform pricing in VKP5 on new price list and am able to generate assortment list change idoc and also idoc based on direct request. The only problem I am facing is the WBBDLD05 idoc that is getting created is missing E1WBB13 segment.
When I run the RWDBBUPD_HPR for an existing partner type (old) idoc is created with all the necessary segments including E1WBB13 segment, but for the same article when I run for new partner type (new pricelist refsite) all segments are created except for the E1WBB13 segment.
I am aware only MVKE and MARC are channel/site specific and requires extensions.
Article inforecord can be maintained for many access sequence
Vendor-Article or Vendor-Article-Site etc.
In my case the the site is a pos reference site hence there should not be any article infor rec for this relation ship.
E1WBB13 segment is primarily for vendor details (based on relationships existing in EINA table and inforecord (suppliers). Since the article inforecord is already existing, then why is is not appearing?
What I am missing out?
A help will be appreciated.
Thanks & Regards,
Anirban Roy

Sorted the issue out back then myself.
Just to Close of this long open Query.
Config missing Site - Purchasing organization for the pos reference site.
Maintained that Issue Resolved.
Reason
Article related to POS Ref Site.
Article Related to Vendor Master
Vendor Associated to Purch Org.
Hence there is a requirement to associate Site - Purch Org for E1WBB13 segment in WBBDLD for the pos ref. site which was missing.
Once done relationship completed.
Bingo!!
Thanks.

Stationary images missing/segmented when email is forwarded

I used one of the Mail Stationaries to send an email. The email recipient was able to view the mail correctly with all the images/graphics, but when he forwarded the email, all the graphics/images in the email was either missing or segmented (a piece of the graphic is in one place in the email and another piece is in a different place in the email).
Is there a way to preserve the images/graphics in a stationary email when the email is forwarded multiple times?

this is a problem with the email client of your email recipient, not Mail. if it can not handle emails made using Mail stationery correctly (they are pretty complicated under the hood), there is nothing you can do about it. built in stationery is not customizable and you can not change its programming structure.

Missing XML elements are no longer treated as NULL value (MDM 7.1 SP04)

Hello,
We have a problem with importing XML files with missing XML segments (and hence missing XML fields) in XML file.
In MDM 7.1 SP03 (7.1.03.72), missing fields within a missing segment (so no tags at all for segment and fields) were still represented in the import manager as NULL value in the value mapping, making it possible to do value mapping and to import this NULL value into MDM (overwriting existing values in MDM).
As of MDM 7.1 SP04 (we are running 7.1.04.126) the missing fields within an missing segment are no longer represented in the import manager as NULL value in value mapping!
I don't know if that's a new 'feature' in SP04 but we are now running into following problem:
- We are importing customer data from ECC into MDM, where some segments are optional
- The fields within the (optional) segment are mapped to a multi-valued tuple field
- When we now import a customer that has values for the optional segment, the tuple field gets filled correctly
- When the optional data is now removed completely from the customer in ECC, we don't get that segment anymore in the XML file (this is how the Idoc works on ECC side, if all entries from the optionel segment are deleted then the complete segment is missing in the XML file)
- In SP03 we replaced the existing tuple records with the NULL value (leaving 1 empty tuple record, but this is known issue to SAP, so we've accepted this for the moment)
- In SP04 we cannot replace the existing tuple records anymore, since when complete segment is missing, the fields within that segment gets no value at all (in source values). So we are not able to replace the existing tuple records with NULL/nothing, leaving the 'old' tuple values in MDM!
Does anyone have solution for this (that also works with SP04)?
We already tried to replace the complete record in MDM (instead of updating it, this is possible since we always get the latest (and complete) status of a customer), but we are also mapping the remote key, and hence you are not allowed to replace the record during import!
Other solution could be to have PI add any missing segment into the XML message, but we first want to make sure that this cannot be handled within MDM Import Manager itself.
Thanks in advance,
Marcel Herber
Edited by: P.H.M. Herber on Apr 27, 2010 3:46 PM

Hi Marcel,
I haven't tried it with XML file but i hope it may help you.
long back i need to send one field with value null if it doesn't come in source file and if it comes then original value.
What i did, i loaded a file which does not have this field, so in MDM Import Manager, under source hierarchy i created a field say ABC and map this field with target field and its value Null with Null, i also save this property in map using configuration options-->Automap fields when loading map = Yes
So whenever a file come with missing field ABC, automatically this field get created and mapped with target field and its value Null with target Null. on the other hand, If this field actually comes in Source File(Delimited, Excel) ABC then this field with its original value gets map with target field value. That time it worked fine.
Just try and revert with result if it helps..
Else, using PI is the best option to create that missing segment into the XML message.
Regards,
Mandeep Saini

PDF has missing text when created from FM 9

My Software:
Windows XP Professional Version 2002 SP 3
FrameMaker 9.0p255
Adobe Acrobat 9 Pro Version 9.4.1
When generating a PDF document from FrameMaker, the PDF document has random missing text, including whole paragraphs, sentences and some text in tables. We have several FrameMaker books and they are all having the same issues. These books were fine when we last published updates within the last month and we have not made any changes to fonts.
When generating a PDF from FrameMaker, we always print the book to a postscript file first following these steps:
- Go to File > Print Book.
- Select the Adobe PDF printer.
- Select the Print to File option and specify a .ps filename.
- Select the Generate Acrobat Data option.
- Use Acrobat Distiller to convert the PS file to PDF.
Note that I also tried File > Save As PDF and got the same results.

Did you reboot after the hotfix? fwiw, other users on the forum have had difficulty with the hotfix not being installed correctly the first time around.
once you download the hotfix from MS you have to run the .exe, and then when it’s finished you have to reboot. Then check the Add or Remove programs in Control panel, and click the “show updates” button, then scroll way down to see the hotfixes, to be sure that #952909 is shown.
What fonts are you using in your documents? Specific type (PS, TT, OTF) and any other info you have (foundry, etc).
Do the "gaps" seem to occur when there are font changes in the document, e.g. when words in a sentence are bold or when a paragraph in a different weight (e.g. bold italic) follows, say, a "regular" text weight paragraph? As another test, can you highlight a segment of good+bad+good text in the PDF, do Control+c to copy it to the clipboard, then Control+v to paste it into a different file (Word, text editor, even another new FM document). Do the words of the "missing" text segments show up?
edit: the hotfix download process is a bit confusing; if I remember correctly it has to be requested, then MS sends a link to the download webpage, then the downloaded .exe has to be run.

PDF has missing 'o' from printouts

I'm running MAC OS X 10.6.8 and when I print from PREVIEW Version 5.0.3 (504.1), my lower case "o"s do not print. They do however print from ADOBE. I've updated my printer driver; firmware; checked and fixed fonts in the font book. The problem still exists. The problem happens on 2 separate computers at 2 separate locations on 2 separate HP printers (the common denominator is the version of PREVIEW).
thank you.

Did you reboot after the hotfix? fwiw, other users on the forum have had difficulty with the hotfix not being installed correctly the first time around.
once you download the hotfix from MS you have to run the .exe, and then when it’s finished you have to reboot. Then check the Add or Remove programs in Control panel, and click the “show updates” button, then scroll way down to see the hotfixes, to be sure that #952909 is shown.
What fonts are you using in your documents? Specific type (PS, TT, OTF) and any other info you have (foundry, etc).
Do the "gaps" seem to occur when there are font changes in the document, e.g. when words in a sentence are bold or when a paragraph in a different weight (e.g. bold italic) follows, say, a "regular" text weight paragraph? As another test, can you highlight a segment of good+bad+good text in the PDF, do Control+c to copy it to the clipboard, then Control+v to paste it into a different file (Word, text editor, even another new FM document). Do the words of the "missing" text segments show up?
edit: the hotfix download process is a bit confusing; if I remember correctly it has to be requested, then MS sends a link to the download webpage, then the downloaded .exe has to be run.

Missing MLGN Segments

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for