Missing package: SUNWbcp (SunOS 4.x Binary Compatibility)

I have downloaded the latest Free Solaris 10 8/07 for x86 and retrieve the following error message:
Missing package: SUNWbcp (SunOS 4.x Binary Compatibility)
when installing Business Objects Enterprise XI Release 2 Service Pack 2. I can't locate the package on neither the CDs nor the DVD I downloaded.
Any advise would be highly appreciated.
Many thanks.
Jurgs
Edited by: tzscl2 on Dec 12, 2007 12:52 AM

Similar Messages

AIX missing packages issue

Hi guys,
In trying to install 11gr2 on AIX 5.3 I need to install the packages rsct.basic.rte and rsct.compat.clients.rte. I have these packages available but for some reason, i'm getting some inconsistent errors..
If i try to install rsct.compat.clients.rte i get :
Pre-installation Failure/Warning Summary
Name Level Pre-installation Failure/Warning
rsct.compat.clients.hacmp 2.4.1.0 Already installed
rsct.compat.clients.rte 2.4.1.0 Already installed
rsct.compat.clients.rte 2.4.1.0 Already installed
rsct.compat.clients.sp 2.4.12.0 Already installed
but if i try to install rsct.compat.basic:
SELECTED FILESETS: The following is a list of filesets that you asked to
install. They cannot be installed until all of their requisite filesets
are also installed. See subsequent lists for details of requisites.
rsct.basic.hacmp 2.4.1.0 # RSCT Basic Function (HACMP/E...
rsct.basic.rte 2.4.1.0 # RSCT Basic Function
rsct.basic.rte 2.4.12.0 # RSCT Basic Function
rsct.basic.sp 2.4.1.0 # RSCT Basic Function (PSSP Su...
MISSING REQUISITES: The following filesets are required by one or more
of the selected filesets listed above. They are not currently installed
and could not be found on the installation media.
rsct.basic.hacmp 2.4.12.0 # Base Level Fileset
rsct.basic.sp 2.4.12.0 # Base Level Fileset
rsct.compat.basic.hacmp 2.4.12.0 # Base Level Fileset
rsct.compat.basic.sp 2.4.12.0 # Base Level Fileset
rsct.compat.clients.hacmp 2.4.12.0 # Base Level Fileset
rsct.compat.clients.rte 2.4.12.0 # Base Level Fileset
First error i've spotted is rsct.compat.clients.rte has to be at version 2.4.12.0 whereas i only have 2.4.1.0 .. however I'm unsure why the others are being flagged as necessary as well..
Anyone have experience/thoughts on why this might be occurring?
AIX version (from oslevel -s) is : 5300-04-CSP-0000
Thanks guys :)

Thanks for the reply.. The post is related to an Oracle installation on a supported operating system.... the package dependencies are for Oracle's processes and as an installation forum i would have thought this would be the best place to ask this kind of question. If we can ask Windows server/Linux questions (of which i see quite a few), why not AIX?
The server is dedicated to an 11gR2 installation.. nothing else needs or uses these packages, the prompt to install them came from the oracle installer...
Any other more helpful posters?

Install DB 10gR2 on RHEL 5.4 x-86 - missing packages

Hi experts,
I am having some problems installing oracle database 10gR2 on RedHat Linux Enterprise 5.4 because on missing packages.
I get the following messages when checking for packages;
enmotif21
binutils-2.17.50.0.6-12.el5
package compat-db is not installed
control-center-2.16.0-16.el5
gcc-4.1.2-46.el5
gcc-c++-4.1.2-46.el5
glibc-2.5-42
glibc-common-2.5-42
package gnome-libs is not installed
libstdc++-4.1.2-46.el5
libstdc++-devel-4.1.2-46.el5
make-3.81-3.el5
package pdksh is not installed
package sysstat is not installed
package xscreensaver is not installed
libaio-0.3.106-3.2
package openmotif21 is not installed
I would like to know the exact names of the packages that are needed and where can i get them.
Thanking you in advance

Step No. 1
First of all you have to install the default package selection while installing RHEL 5.4 x-86. Thereafter you need to install the following rpms manually
1.      glibc-devel-2.5-24.i386.rpm
2.      libaio-0.3.106-3.2.i386.rpm
3.      sysstat-7.0.2-1.el5.i386.rpm
4.      java-1.4.2-gcj-compat-src-1.4.2.0-40jpp.115.i386.rpm
5.      compat-gcc-34-c++-3.4.6-4.i386.rpm
6.     compat-gcc-34-3.4.6-4.i386.rpm
7.      compat-libstdc++-33-3.2.3-61.i386.rpm
8.      compat-libstdc++-295-2.95.3-85.i386.rpm
Step No. 2
Edit the "/etc/redhat-release" file
Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 5.4 (Tikanga)
to
Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 4.4 (Tikanga)
Step No. 3
While installing you may encounter the following error
Exception java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: /tmp/OraInstall2009-10-01_09-18-29AM/jre/1.4.2/lib/i386/libawt.so: libXp.so.6: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory occurred..
java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: /tmp/OraInstall2009-10-01_09-18-29AM/jre/1.4.2/lib/i386/libawt.so: libXp.so.6: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
to overcome this error, you have to install the following packages
libXpm-3.5.5-3
libXp-1.0.0-8
libXpm-devel-3.5.5-3
$ rpm -Uvh libXp-* --nodeps (This option is given to avoid any dependency problem)
Hope this will help you in installing

Launch SunOs 5.10 Binary on SunOS 5.6

I compiled a my source on SunOS 5.10 with f95
and now I try to launch it on SunOS 5.6.
First some libraries wasn't there, after I copied this libraries on my SunOS 5.6
I get the following error message:
ld.so.1: ./sdat: fatal: relocation error: file /usr/lib/libthread.so.1: symbol
libcthreads_interface: referenced symbol not found
ld.so.1: ./sdat: fatal: relocation error: file /usr/lib/libthread.so.1: symbol
libcthreads_interface: referenced symbol not found
Killed
Pls, can you help me, what can I do to launch my program on the older SunOS 5.6?
Thanx and bye
Jochen

Sorry, it is hardly possible. Generally the procedure to run binary on a range of SunOS'es is to compile it on the oldest one.
We provide this kind of binary compatibility, but not backward.
Compiling on newer OS (10) you make your binary dependant on a newer interfaces which are not available in previous OS versions.
Thus if you intend to run on Solaris 8, 9 and 10 you should compile on Solaris 8.
In your case a newer interface you have stumbled upon is a private part of libc threads.
Solaris 10 is waaay different from previous versions (threading part in particular), you might be lucky with going from Solaris 8 down to 6, but not from Solaris 10.
Anyway, this questions might be better answered on Solaris forum. They might know some hacks around. Compilers itself cant solve this problem.
regards,
__Fedor.

Binary compatibility problems using Sun Studio 12

I'm working in a project that uses Orbix [1] third-party libraries. I have installed the Sun Studio 12 on Solaris 10 SPARC but I have got some strange segfault problems (the exactly same code works fine in a Linux box - using g++). I read the 1.4 section of Sun Studio 12 C++ Userguide [2] but I have a doubt:
Is there no way to compile my code using Sun Studio 12 using shared libraries compiled against earlier Sun Studio C++ compiler versions (like Sun Studio 8 or some version before Sun Studio 11)?
I think my problem is related to the fact that Orbix team used Sun Studio 8 as some notes found in their headers indicate:
"IONA Technologies ART IDL Compiler POA C++ Generator asp 6.3.3 SunOS 5.8 CC_5.5 2008/06/13 21:04:37 EDT"
A secondary question: Is CC 5.5 present in Sun Studio 8, right?
Can anyone help me? Every tips are welcome :) Thanks in advance!
[1] http://web.progress.com/en/orbix/orbix_standard.html
[2] http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/820-7599/6nirkt6f7?a=view

AmadeuBarbosa wrote:
I'm working in a project that uses Orbix [1] third-party libraries. I have installed the Sun Studio 12 on Solaris 10 SPARC but I have got some strange segfault problems (the exactly same code works fine in a Linux box - using g++). I read the 1.4 section of Sun Studio 12 C++ Userguide [2] but I have a doubt:I don't think 1.4 Binary Compatibility Verification applies in your case. It's referring to processor capability to execute certain (new) instructions; if your third-party libraries were compiled a while ago, it's highly unlikely they use instructions not implemented by the processor you have.
Is there no way to compile my code using Sun Studio 12 using shared libraries compiled against earlier Sun Studio C++ compiler versions (like Sun Studio 8 or some version before Sun Studio 11)?Generally speaking, any library compiled with older Sun Studio C++ compiler is supposed to be compatible with any library or executable compiled with newer version provided that all parties did everything right. For example, that third-party libraries should not be statically linked with C++ run-time support libraries; your executable should be linked with latest compiler driver (CC) so that it records correct dependencies on support libraries.
Of course, there could be (and actually are) compiler bugs standing in the way of compatibility. Some of them can be fixed, some - like demangler issue described in http://docs.sun.com/source/820-4155/c++.html - can't. There is no easy way to tell if you hit a compiler bug or bulding/linking issue, or bug in the code that was previously unseen.
I think my problem is related to the fact that Orbix team used Sun Studio 8 as some notes found in their headers indicate:
"IONA Technologies ART IDL Compiler POA C++ Generator asp 6.3.3 SunOS 5.8 CC_5.5 2008/06/13 21:04:37 EDT"Yes, looks like it was compiled by 5.5, which is part of Sun Studio 8
>
A secondary question: Is CC 5.5 present in Sun Studio 8, right?That's correct.

Missing packages in Software Update

Hello,
I wanted to report a problem with software update. We have multiple different T540p models here at work, some are i7s and some are i5s. We do a fresh clean install of Windows to remove all of the bloatware, then run system update to fetch all of the drivers. The i7 models pickup all of the drivers fine, while the i5 models are missing some software packages. I believe system update works by associating your machine type/id with the backend. It will then give you a list of all of the drivers/software required for your system.
The only missing package I noticed is the Hotkeys Features Integration with 8.1 . I know this can be downloaded manually but wanted to pass this along.
Product ID: 20BE004FUS
Serial # isn't needed
Thanks.

When you say "FN Key Manager", are you talking about Hotkeys Features Integration, or something else?
Are you deploying Win7 or Win8.1?

Missing package information on MyBT accounts

Missing package information on MyBT accounts
and after lots of phone call no one can fix it.
which department do i need to talk to.
and can i have a name of some one it that department so I can look them up in the Directory if not a name a EIN will do.

I have asked a moderator to provide assistance, they will post an invite on this thread.
They are the only BT employees on this forum, and are a UK based team of people, who take personal ownership of your problem.
Once you get a reply, make sure that you are logged into the forum, then click on their name, you will see a screen like this. Click on the link as shown below.
Please do not send them a personal message, as they may not be on duty for a long time, and your message will not be tracked properly.
For your own security, do not post any personal details, on this forum. That includes any tracking number you are give.
They will respond either by phone or e-mail within 5-6 working days.
Please use the tracked e-mail, to reply, not via the forum. Thanks
This is the form you should see when you click on the link. If you do not see this form, then you have selected the wrong link.
When you submit the form, you will receive an enquiry number, so please keep a note of it
There are some useful help pages here, for BT Broadband customers only, on my personal website.
BT Broadband customers - help with broadband, WiFi, networking, e-mail and phones.

Missing package... it's been 2 months and still no "refund"

Hi,
Sometime in late March/early April, I filed a missing package report for a pair of headphones I ordered online. Two weeks later, I called up Best Buy about the status of the order, and was told that UPS did an investigation and concluded that the package was lost.
Support told me they would credit me the amount back to my credit card in about 3-5 business days.
It's been two months. I haven't gotten a refund.
I'm not sure whether I should post my reference number here, but it seems like you guys are just stalling me. This is ridiculous. My credit card billing statement is due really soon, and I have an outstanding balance for a pair of headphones I didn't even receive.
Can someone PLEASE fix this for me? You guys have a very unprofessional, roundabout way of doing things. One of the support members I called acted as if she didn't even know what a reference number was.

Hello jbtb07,
Welcome to the forum! After almost two months of trying to sort out an order issue, I can understand why you would be fairly fed up with dealing with this issue. I am sorry to hear that you may not have ever received the headphones, and that you are still trying to find a resolution to this.
Using the email address you registered with your forum, I was able to locate the order. It appears that a resolution was provided to you, and so I am sending you a private message with further details. You may check your private messages by signing into the forum then clicking the envelope icon in the top right corner of the page.
Respectfully,
Tasha|Social Media Specialist | Best Buy® Corporate
Private Message

Missing package metadata

Hello, I'm trying to install package-query with the command,
pacman -U http://mir.archlinux.fr/~tuxce/releases … 1.1.tar.gz
However, it installs and gives the error
missing package metadata in /var/cache/pacman/pkg/package-query-1.1.tar.gz
Then it says that that file is corrupted. I tried this for other things in the aur and it does the same thing.I'm running a base install and this is literally the first file I'm downloading, please help.

First that url is incorrect, I think you mean http://mir.archlinux.fr/~tuxce/releases … 1.1.tar.gz
Second, even the correct url just gets the source code, not a package. And I suspect anything you tried to get off the AUR was just the compressed files needed to build a package, unless you also ran makepkg to build something.
I suggest taking a look at the wiki page

Missing Package(s), Installation Corrupted

Un Gusto saludarlos.
Queria pedir su colaboracion,
Descarge las Imagenes de VMware y tengo la licencia DEMO de DMS 5.3, instale dichas maquinas virtuales y no se genero ningun inconveniente, el DMM y en SnS, mas sin embargo al levantar dichas maquinas virtuales se me muestra el siguiente error: "
Missing Package(s), Installation Corrupted, algun concejo que me puedan brindar, intente instalarlo nuevamente en repetidas ocaciones y siempre obtengo el mismo resultado.
De antemano agradezco muchisimo su ayuda.
Exitos y bendiciones.}
Saludos.....
Adjunto imagen de error

Hello jbtb07,
Welcome to the forum! After almost two months of trying to sort out an order issue, I can understand why you would be fairly fed up with dealing with this issue. I am sorry to hear that you may not have ever received the headphones, and that you are still trying to find a resolution to this.
Using the email address you registered with your forum, I was able to locate the order. It appears that a resolution was provided to you, and so I am sending you a private message with further details. You may check your private messages by signing into the forum then clicking the envelope icon in the top right corner of the page.
Respectfully,
Tasha|Social Media Specialist | Best Buy® Corporate
Private Message

Binary compatibility

Hello all,
I've compiled an app that will run as a service on solaris 8 (on a sparc ultra-5). I've used gcc to compile and the app runs fine on the sparc ultra-5.
My quesion is - will this compiled binary run on an E420 or any other sun hardware? In general, is there some docs/resources that describe binary compatibility across sun hardware?
Thanks for any info.

Hi,
Sun has a very strong binary compatibility guarantee, but I'm not sure where one would find documentation!
I would be more concerned about carting the required GCC runtimes around with you wherever you want to run your binary than Solaris or SPARC binary compatibility.
We build in 32 bit on a quad UltraSPARC III running Solaris 8, using Studio 10 (we were on Workshop 5 until recently!), and most of our customers run on Solaris 9, and in most cases on something a touch faster than UltraSPARC III.
I'd recommend you take a look at the new Studio 11 release (it is free after all) to avoid carting runtimes around with you. Please remember, however, that the machines your software runs on will need to be running at least the same patches as are pre-requisite for Studio 11 (well, the C and C++ runtimes anyway).
-- Michael

Error:   Missing packages: SAPKA71007 (SAP_ABA)

I am upgrading a SAP PI system from 7.0 SPS18 to 7.10 SPS8.
In the Configuration phase I get the error:
ERROR: Unable to generate package queue.
Return Code = 3, Reason = "Package SAPKA71008 : Import
prerequisites are not fulfilled"
Missing packages:
SAPKA71007 (SAP_ABA)
Check log file 'SPDA_PATCHINT.LOG' for details
However I can verify that the XML file that I specified in the upgrade
(T:\usr\sap\trans\EPS\in\SPSTab2.xml) contains the package name
SAPKA71007 and that references file name KA71007.SAR (files 1-8 are
referenced).
Any ideas why the upgrade tool seems to be unable to see the file KA71007.SAR ?
Thanks.

No problem, it was worth looking at
No, the log doesn't mention anything useful, only:
1 ETN214X."**************************************************"
1 ETN250 Start of phase: "'Supp.Pack. Queue Calculation'"
1 ETN252     Start date: "10.08.2009"
1 ETN253     Start time: "11:52:05"
1 ETN214 ."**************************************************"
2 ETN243XCalculating the Support Package queue with the following input queue ...
3 ETN112 The OCS Package Queue is empty
3 ETN247 The calculation is based on the following software component vector:
3 ETN248    Component: "SAP_ABA" rel. "710", Support Package level: "0004" (component type "S")
3 ETN248    Component: "SAP_BASIS" rel. "710", Support Package level: "0004" (component type "S")
3 ETN248    Component: "PI_BASIS" rel. "2006_1_710", Support Package level: "0004" (component type "X")
3 ETN248    Component: "ST-PI" rel. "2005_1_710", Support Package level: "0003" (component type "X")
3 ETN248    Component: "SAP_BW" rel. "710", Support Package level: "0004" (component type "W")
3 ETN249 The following target vector shall be attained:
3 ETN248    Component: "SAP_ABA" rel. "710", Support Package level: "0008" (component type "S")
3 ETN248    Component: "SAP_BASIS" rel. "710", Support Package level: "0008" (component type "S")
3 ETN248    Component: "PI_BASIS" rel. "2006_1_710", Support Package level: "0008" (component type "X")
3 ETN248    Component: "ST-PI" rel. "2005_1_710", Support Package level: "0003" (component type "X")
3 ETN248    Component: "SAP_BW" rel. "710", Support Package level: "0008" (component type "W")
2 ETN085X"1. Calculate Support Package queue part" "for each component" " " " "
3 ETN431    Calculate the queue part for "SAP_ABA" rel."710" with target SP "SAPKA71008" (level "0008")
2WETN423 Package "SAPKA71008": Import prerequisites are not fulfilled
3 ETN245 The following import prerequisites of OCS Package " " have not been met:
3 ETN246    Support Package "SAPKA71007" must be available or already imported in the system

Check binary compatibility between 2 Jars

Hello,
we have a Java API to our repository product. Is there a way to check binary compatibility between different versions of that API? The problem is that the interfaces evolve and sometimes changes are necessary. So we already had the problem that different versions are incompatible.
I found just one tool: japitool. But it does not detect the latest problem we have.
Thanks in advance
Torsten

I mean the facts and rules described in chapter 13 of the Java language specification (Binary Compatibility; http://java.sun.com/docs/books/jls/second_edition/html/binaryComp.doc.html#44872).
Torsten

[SOLVED] Missing package () function for PyTyle2

Hi, I was trying to install this tarball from the AUR: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=42541
But it prompts the following error:
==> ERROR: Missing package() function in /home/kolt/AUR/pytyle2-hg/PKGBUILD
I've read the PKGBUILD and have no idea why this is happening. I already installed the dependencies needed.
Any clue?
Last edited by Kolt Penny (2015-02-06 08:31:45)

Kolt Penny wrote:I've read the PKGBUILD and have no idea why this is happening. I already installed the dependencies needed.
Read the pacman output, it refers to the package() function and makepkg doesn't find it in the PKGBUILD as said. Ask the maintainer to update or orphan it, if he doesn't respond file an AUR request.

Checkstyle warning: Missing package-info.java file

Hi,
I'm getting a checkstyle warning for a simple class which looks like:
package tools.interprocess;
* Class for testing RMI.
* @author spinth
public final class RMITest {
     * Private constructor.
    private RMITest() {
     * Main method.
     * @param args User arguments
    public static void main(final String[] args) {
}The warning message says: Missing package-info.java file
I really couldn't figure out what this means and how I can fix it. Do I have to add something to the source tree?
I'm using Eclipse for development and Eclipse-cs as my checkstyle plug-in.
Thanks.
Edited by: spinth on Apr 15, 2010 12:37 PM

If you don't want that warning then simply turn it of.
A package-info.java file is there mostly to attach JavaDoc to the package itself.
If you don't need/want that, then the checkstyle warning is useless. Checkstyle (and similar tools) are meant to be tweaked to your needs and not used blindly.

Missing package: SUNWbcp (SunOS 4.x Binary Compatibility)

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for