Missing Parts in MDVP
Hi All - Can any of you help me with the below issue under availability check for planned orders? Here is the scenario, our client needs to run the availability check for planned orders upfront to get a better understanding of what materials will be short before they are converted to process orders. I have been testing MDVP transaction but it doesn't completely satisfy the requirement. Please see the example below and let me know if there is any thing that we can set in config. to fix the issue.
Lets say there is a Finished good A which has a BOM with components B and C. To make it simple with numbers, we will need 100 EA of B and 100 EA of C to make 100 EA of A. We have 3 planned orders created for A for 100 EA per planned order. Available stock for B is 0 EA but we have 100 EA of material C available. Now when I run the collective availability check for these planned orders in MDVP and go to the missing parts list, I can see that part B is indicated as missing (check box for missing part list) for all 3 planned orders which is perfect as we dont have any available stock. However, material C doesn't have the missing part indicator checked for any of the orders. This is my issue, as we know we only have 100 EA available but the total requirement across 3 planned orders is 300 EA so ideally system should flag material C for the last two orders (based on the dates) to be missing.
I have checked all threads but couldnot find an answer. I have included dependent req. and reservations in the scope of check for the checking rule that we are using that way system should include all existing dependent requirements(from these planned orders). Note that commited qty is 0 for all planned orders as none of them could be satisfied because of shortage of B.
I have tested both individual and ATP check while doing the availability check but it didn't make any difference.
Note that when I change the requirement Qty for C on the planned orders to 200 (or any number greater than 100) then system will flag material C for all 3 orders to be missing. So it is more like checking the availability for components individually(per planned order) rather than collectively. I am not sure if there is a setting that will change the way this check is done but this is what is happening for the available quantity of the component.
Please let me know if you have any solution.
Thanks,
Bharath
Hi Suri - Thanks for your response. I tried both with blank(individual and collective) and 2 (collective req. only) but I still get the same result. I found one other setting that can solve this issue and that is checking the activate full confirmation logic at the the MRP group level in OPPR. I will test more and let you know if that works but we dont use MRP groups here at our client and that is why I was little hesistant to set up collective availability check parameters at the MRP group level. But looks like this is the only option that we can use to get this resolved.
Thanks,
Bharath
Similar Messages
-
Missing part for planned order-reg
Hi,
I want to see missing parts list against planned orders. I checked through MDVP but it shows all components as missing parts eventhough stock is available.
Is there any way to see this.
Regards
KarthikDear Karthikeyan,
In general Availability check is done at production order level and rarely in REM scenario's this check is
carried out at planned order level.
Because planned order's are a proposal,which may/may not be converted into a production order.
At planned order level you carry out an ATP check and its based on the checking group,checking
rule,and the scope of check.
So check the config settings in OPJJ particularly for the scope of check.
Here the check box -->check without RLT plays a vital role.
once after carrying out ATP,the system shows the committed quantity,say if the order is for 100 and
suppose if the raw materials are available only for making 20 means then after making ATP check in the
planned order header you can see an additonal field called commited quantity below the order quantity.
Check in MD12 for an individual planned order and it works based on the availability check value
assigned in the material master.
Regards
Mangalraj.S -
Hi Guru's,
When we checked the missing part list in the "COOISPI "report (Process Order infromation system) for the planned order and compared this with the missing parts in the MD12 for the particular planned Order, there was a differnece in number of entires (components) betwwne both these lists. why is the missing part list for MD12 and COOISPI is showing the difference?
If anyone is familiar with this report please let me know what can be the reason for the difference. also can any explain the logic how this report does the availability check for the missing parts.
Thanks,
Nagesh.Dear Nagesh,
1) For missing parts at plan order level check in MDVP ( Not in COOISPI )
2) Compare MDVP with MD12
3) AV check will carried out based on settings defined in OPJJ ( Combination of cheing group & checking rule )
Regards
Madhu Kumar -
Missing parts list at planned order level
I have tried to use comac t-code for checking the missing parts list at planned order level. but no log has been generated. pls advise. Is there any way to do the same?
Hi,
Use MDVP, i think it should meet your need.
If helpful award points
Regards,
Vivek -
Availability check gives missing parts because of POu200F
Hello All,
For production order creation and order release we have different types of availability checks:
1: Order creation: check all purchase orders
2: Order release: do not take purchase orders into account
The problem with this is that as soon as we want to release a production order, the future purchase orders are not taken into account, but the corresponding production orders (created ones) are. This yields missing parts at release, even though there is enough in stock.
How can this be solved?
Regards,
MarcHi!
I came across that post previously & have already gone through each setting on it.
The Check Rule has been maintained correctly in config via txn OPPJ.
My issue is that it's not being displayed on the Missing Parts view of MDVP, but it is when I look @ the Availability Check when run on the Planned Order.
The Check Rule column is blank on MDVP but it's populated on MD12.
Any idea why?
Thanks,
k -
OSSNOTES for releasing process orders with missing parts in background
Hi All,
The bapi 'BAPI_PROCORD_RELEASE' is not releasing the process orders
with missing parts in background.
Is there any OSSNotes for releasing these process orders in backgound through this bapi.
Pls help.
Thanks .Hi Suri - Thanks for your response. I tried both with blank(individual and collective) and 2 (collective req. only) but I still get the same result. I found one other setting that can solve this issue and that is checking the activate full confirmation logic at the the MRP group level in OPPR. I will test more and let you know if that works but we dont use MRP groups here at our client and that is why I was little hesistant to set up collective availability check parameters at the MRP group level. But looks like this is the only option that we can use to get this resolved.
Thanks,
Bharath -
Missing Parts report for Purchase Orders
Hey Gurus,
We are running the availability check for Purchase orders and the user group is wondering if there is a standard Missing Parts report in SAP similiar to transaction CO24 for Purchase Orders so that they can view all of the Purchase orders with missing parts.
As a side note, we are using subcontracting purchase orders.didn't get a response.
-
Standard Report for missing parts at production order operation level?
Hi PP Gurus,
We have standard report for missing parts at production orders level.
For our client, they need a report for missing parts analysis at production order operation level. Do we have any such standard report in the SAP?
Please help.
Thanks,
Reddy.Hi Arvind,
Thanks for for your response.
1. List: Components, Layout: Standard layout set the Missing part
It shows the component requirement/withdrawn quantity for each operation of production order. It is not showing the commit quantity.
2. List: Components, Layout: Pick list set the Missing part
It shows the component requirement/withdrawn quantity for each production order.
3. List: Components, Layout: Missing Parts List-Material View set the Missing part
It shows the component requirement/commit quantity for each production order. It is not showing the commit quantity at opertion level.
4. List: Components, Layout: Missing Parts List-Order View set the Missing part
It shows the component requirement/commit quantity for each production order. It is not showing the commit quantity at opertion level.
We are unable to get the solution from all these 1 to 4 reports from COOIS.
Do we have any option to change the existing layout (ex: 3 ) to get the commit quantity for operation with missing parts indicator?
If avilable, what is the procedure to be followed?
Thanks,
Reddy. -
Missing parts for Process orders
Hi Experts,
We are trying to find out the Transaction to faciltate the Missing parts list for the process order even after the order has been completed having the Status TECO, CLSD. This is to understand whether proper enough materials are consumed for the order or not. Based on that Production incharge can ensure the component consumption is made as per the Process order requirement.
We are trying with CO24, this is showing the missing parts list if order does not contain TECO and CLSD status.
Also we are checking with COOISPI, COID, but could find the correct feature out of them.
Do we need to develop any customized report with the help ABAPers.If yes please guide us the method.
Please help us in acheiving the list of components which are not consumed as per the Process order requirement.
Also guide us to identify the list of materials which are excess consumed for the Process order.
Thanks in advance..Hi Jiaul,
Thank you very much for your reply.
So we need to develop the program to flag the missing parts and its qty even after the Order has the status TECO or CLSD.
Can you please provide logic to develop the Program.
I am thinking to take the inputs from process order required qty Vs withdrwan qty. if the Qty difference is positve, which should come under missing parts. if the difference is still negative means excess qty consumed.
Waiting for suggestions
Thanks in advance -
Missing Parts List While creating Prd. Order
Hi Friends,
My client is creating production Orders Manually thru CO01and While Creating & Saving The Production Order System Is Not Supporting In Giving Missing Parts list In spite Of Deficit of Un Restricted stock inStorage Location For BOM components used in that Order.
To my surprise when the defisit is for all the BOM components only one component is showing as missing part in missing parts list.
But While confirming the order The system is showing missing parts for all the components which are defisit for order confirmation.
I Tried To Get This From the Following Method
Checked For Define checking control In OPJK.
Selected plant, Order type & selected the business function 1 for create or 2 for release. And Maintained These Settings
a) Removed tick mark in No Availability check.
b) Type of component check Given as - ATP check.
c) Material release - 1. User decides on release if parts are missing.
d) PP Checking rule (Which Is same As with plant parameter OPPQ)
e) In Define scope of check (OPJJ) made a tick mark in check w/o RLT.
Then Assigned the availability checking group at Mrp View of Header material.
In spite Of All These Settings Still At The Time Of Order Release/Save A Warning Massage Or A Informative Massage Is Not Appearing
*Please Suggestu2026u2026u2026u2026*
hariHi,
Please check same checking rule use in Material master and with order type and plant?
Check the cheking group in material master MRP3 view for all material.
Go to Transection OPJJ - Maintain scope of check,
Select your Checking rule which you have assing to your order type and tick INLCUDE RESERVATION.
(1). CO24- Missing Parts Information System
Under this transaction you choose Selection from Reservations and then select Plant & Material then you can get Missing Parts List for your respective material without production / planned order also.
(2). COOIS : Production Order Information System
Under this transaction you need to Select in List option as Components and then go on Selection Tab.
For collective availability check use
COHV - Excute the roport w ith collective avaliabilty check.
COMAC.
Hope this help.
Regards,
R.Brahmankar -
MSPT/MACM status at network header - Missing Parts
I have a query with regards to how the MSPT(missing parts) status is set/unset at the network header level.
My question is why is the Missing Part status set to INACTIVE at the Network Header level when several components have the Missing Part indicator set.
The MACM status is set as ACTIVE instead at the network header level.Dear Chandra shekar,
check for the production order type and plant combination in OPJK for business function 1 - material availability check during order
creation for the check box - check material availability during order creation and likewise for business function 2 - material
availability during order release and the setting for release material .
Kindly make the required setting after discussing with your PP consultant and go ahead.
Regards
Mangalraj.S -
Message for Missing Parts While Creating Order
Dear Friends,
While Creating & Saving The Production Order System Is Not Supporting In Giving A Warning Massage On Missing Parts In spite Of Deficit In Storage Location For Materials.
The Clint Requires A Warning Massage In Case Of Materials Shortage In SL
I Tried To Get This From the Following Method
Checked For Define checking control In OPJK.
Selected plant, Order type & selected the business function 1 for create or 2 for release. And Maintained These Settings
a) Removed tick mark in No Availability check.
b) Type of component check Given as - ATP check.
c) Material release - 1. User decides on release if parts are missing.
d) PP Checking rule (Which Is same As with plant parameter OPPQ)
e) In Define scope of check (OPJJ) made a tick mark in check w/o RLT.
Then Assigned the availability checking group at Mrp View of Header material.
In spite Of All These Settings Still At The Time Of Order Release/Save A Warning Massage Or A Informative Massage Is Not Appearing
Please Suggestu2026u2026u2026u2026
HariDear Friends,
I Did The Following Settings
A) Define Checking control 02 Individual Req
Total Sales Single Record
Total Div Rec Single Record
B)Define Checking Rule PP Check Rule
C)Define Scope Of Check Availability Check 02 Ind Req
Checking Rule PP Check Rule
Stock
Include Safety stock
Stock In Transfer
Incl Quanty Insp Stock
And When No tick Mark Is Applied In NO Stor Loc Inspectn
Not Used Checking Group "KP" In components material master.
After Making All This Settings Also Before Order ReleaseWhen Pressed u201CMaterial Availability Checku201D
The System Is Showing All Materials Available In Spite Of Deficit In Storage Location
Suggestu2026u2026 -
Prevent creation of production order in case of missing parts
Hi,
Even in OPJH I have maintained no creation of order in case of missing parts, when i create a production order from planned order and I know the Bom components are not avialable in stock then also system allows to create. Pls guide on how to pevent creation of order.
Regards.Dear,
If my understanding is correct then the settings in OPJK for business function 1 - availability check during order creation even if
the value is set as 3 for collective conversion,this works during partial conversion of planned order into production/process
order or during collective conversion of planned orders into production orders.
But however the setting in OPJK for business functionality 2 - during order release checks and if
there are any missing parts means the order cant be released for the value 3 set for release material.
Just check this link also,
Re: Avalability Check
Regards
Mangalraj.S -
Missing part check functionaliy at the time of GR when using IDOCS
Hi All,
We are using IDOCs to record the the Good Receipt for the Purchase Orders.
Then a BAPI is called to post the GR.
There is a functionality for missing parts checks which can be activated at the time of GR which checks the ATP & sends mail to MRP controller.
When we directly use the MIGO, then missing part check is activated & a mail is sent to MRP controller.
If we use the IDOC to post the GR, the missing part check is not activated & mhence mail is not sent to MRP controller.
Pl let us know if there is a way by which we can activate the missing part check in GR using IDOCS.
Regards
VineetHi,
The G/L accounts which you give in the PO will be Debited & your vendor A/c will be crdtd at the time of LIV.
Thanks & Regards, -
Hello,
we have activated the missing part message in MIGO using transaction OMBC.
All is working fine and we receive an notification in business workplace.
The problem is that only one person receives the mail and we want that all MRP controllers get an notification.
In transaction OMBC under "Mail user" we can only maintain one "Recipient Name".
But what is the meaning of "Recipient for mail to MRP controller"? Can we here use position to maintain all controolers in the organization model of the PD (PD-ORG)?
Thanks
ArnfriedHi There
Specification of the mail recipient- System sends the missing part message to the material planner(MRP Controller) responsible for the material,, in order for this to happen , a user ID must be assigned to the material planner,,
Specification of missing part expediter- if no user ID is assigned to the responsible material planner, the message is sent to the central missing part expediter responsible for the plant. This person is defined per plant,,
So this is what happening in your place,, maintain the user ID to the MRP controller,, then it will work fine,,
Maintain the below settings--
SPRO-IMG-Materials Management-Consumption-Based Planning-Master Data-Define MRP Controllers-Double click on MRP controllers-Maintain the field Recipient Name (User ID) then system will trigger the mail to MRP controllers...
Hope it helps
Thanks
Senthil
Maybe you are looking for
-
Problem with ioinning multiple Threads
Hi, I have multiple sub Threads T1, T2, T3.... started by main Thread T. After starting each sub Thread, I stored them in the HashMap. When finish starting all Threads, I want to join each sub Thread to my main Thread. The problem is when T3 join wit
-
Number of elements in the FP affecting the performance of my application ?
I developed a simple application which consists of aquiring a signal through a channel of a PXI 5102 module and commanding some relays of a SCXI 1161 module. This application has the following features : -The user can, at any time, change the configu
-
I am having trouble figuring this out. My composition has been made in after effects cs6 I only imported an image. I am projecting the image to create a 3d feel. In the preview the image looks great. The issue is when render the composition the quali
-
I have just downloaded iPhoto from the app store. The photo library from my old laptop was backed up on an external hard drive and I retrieved the photos from there. Now when I open the photos on my new Mac Book Pro, they are small - am I missing so
-
This may seem a really obvious question, but.... Whenever I view my photos (taken with an 8 megapixel Nikon) on iPhoto they are a good size, and expand well when I view them in full screen. However, whenever I view them in Finder and double click on