Missing Parts List While creating Prd. Order
Hi Friends,
My client is creating production Orders Manually thru CO01and While Creating & Saving The Production Order System Is Not Supporting In Giving Missing Parts list In spite Of Deficit of Un Restricted stock inStorage Location For BOM components used in that Order.
To my surprise when the defisit is for all the BOM components only one component is showing as missing part in missing parts list.
But While confirming the order The system is showing missing parts for all the components which are defisit for order confirmation.
I Tried To Get This From the Following Method
Checked For Define checking control In OPJK.
Selected plant, Order type & selected the business function 1 for create or 2 for release. And Maintained These Settings
a) Removed tick mark in No Availability check.
b) Type of component check Given as - ATP check.
c) Material release - 1. User decides on release if parts are missing.
d) PP Checking rule (Which Is same As with plant parameter OPPQ)
e) In Define scope of check (OPJJ) made a tick mark in check w/o RLT.
Then Assigned the availability checking group at Mrp View of Header material.
In spite Of All These Settings Still At The Time Of Order Release/Save A Warning Massage Or A Informative Massage Is Not Appearing
*Please Suggestu2026u2026u2026u2026*
hari
Hi,
Please check same checking rule use in Material master and with order type and plant?
Check the cheking group in material master MRP3 view for all material.
Go to Transection OPJJ - Maintain scope of check,
Select your Checking rule which you have assing to your order type and tick INLCUDE RESERVATION.
(1). CO24- Missing Parts Information System
Under this transaction you choose Selection from Reservations and then select Plant & Material then you can get Missing Parts List for your respective material without production / planned order also.
(2). COOIS : Production Order Information System
Under this transaction you need to Select in List option as Components and then go on Selection Tab.
For collective availability check use
COHV - Excute the roport w ith collective avaliabilty check.
COMAC.
Hope this help.
Regards,
R.Brahmankar
Similar Messages
-
How to restrict the the oreder reason list while creating sales order
Hi gurus,
Can anyone suggest me
how to restrict the Order rerson list
while creating the sales order in VA01
Thanks & Regards
kalyan.hi,
Try this exit:
Enhancement MMFAB001 User exit for generation of release order
Thanks,
AMS -
Why the missing parts list changed after Pro.order released
I open a pro.order before released ,then I do the availability check get a missing parts list, this list including less parts than the missing parts after pro.order released ,why does it caused?which configuration caused?
Thanks,
HelaiHi Lai,
You can do Material Availability check at the two stage of Production / Process Orders.
- First is to control (Check Missing Part) at the time of Order Creation.
T.code is OPJK - Select order type and Business Transaction -1 at the time of Order Creation
- Second is to control(Check Missing Part) at the of Order Relase.
T.code is OPJK - Select order type and Business Transaction - 2 at the time of Order release.
So it may possible that you have assign different checking group or checks to the above both stages , that's why you got different result regarding missing parts during above both stages.
Regards,
Dhaval -
Missing part list in plant maintenance ( CO 24)
Hi SAP experts,
Is it possible to use the transaction CO24 ( missing part list) for plant maintenance orders? If yes, what are prerequesites & configurations needed for it?
RegardsHi,
I think CO24 can be used for Maintenance Orders too.... as there is no order category field mentioned in the selection screen.
Try for one the PM order and check ... currently I don't have any PM order other wise I would have checked and let you know....
Hope thsi will help you.
regards
radhak mk -
Hi Team,
We are facing issue for availability check. During creation of Production order, the missing part list is not complete and it should show componenet A in the Missing part list. Below is the details:
Production Order quantity: 100 kg
Componenet A required quantity: 100 kg
MMBE Unrestricted qty: 1000 kg
MMBE Reserved Quantity: 2000 kg
So as per above figures component A should come as missing part during availability check. But it is not coming as missing part. Please check and give your inputs.Hello
The results of availability check should NEVER be compared with MMBE. As already mentioned, transaction CO09 is more appropriate.
Also, this issue has been already discussed on hundreds of threads in the past. See some examples below:
Problem with missing parts list during production order creation
issue in committing material for production order
Material Availibility check in Production orders
availability check
order is not released
As it is stated on the The SCN Rules of Engagement you should do some research before opening a thread. Therefore, please use the search tool or even google to search for similar problems before opening a thread.
BR
Caetano -
Scope of Check Variation in Missing Part list Production Order
Hi,
I have a problem that While creation or conversion from planned order to production order if i get missing part list i found that Scope of check is as Z6 and ZP (Checking rule).But when when i Release the same production order also am getting missing part list here when i check scope of check as Z6 and PP(Checking rule).
Why this difference is coming,can any body tell the possible causes.
Cheers,
Kumar.S>
KUMAR.S. wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a problem that While creation or conversion from planned order to production order if i get missing part list i found that Scope of check is as Z6 and ZP (Checking rule).But when when i Release the same production order also am getting missing part list here when i check scope of check as Z6 and PP(Checking rule).
>
> Why this difference is coming,can any body tell the possible causes.
>
> Cheers,
> Kumar.S
Kumar,
Its simple for creation and release of Production order different checking rule is used(This must be intentional). You check this in OPJK transaction, check for your order type / Plant combination for Business function 1(Create) the checking rule assigned would be ZP, whereas for the same order type / Plant combination for Business function 2(Release) the checking rule would be PP.
If you want the same, you can change it here. But I assume there must have been a purpose for this custom checking rule creation. You can find the scope of check difference between these 2 combinations in transaction OPJJ.
Regards,
Prasobh -
Missing Part list for Plant to Plant Purchase order
Hi,
I need the following requirement in CO24,
In CO24 its shows the missing parts for Sales order, similarly we want the missing parts list for Plant to Plant Purchase order in the same report. Also the report,
1.It should not consider the Planned order for a sales order.
2.It should not consider the planned order which can be convert into purchase requisition.
3.The procurement type should be "E" or "X".
Kindly guide me is there any standard layout changes in available or any development we have to do.
Thanks
Muthamil Murugan.GHi Purushothaman,
If you have the following settings in OPJK:
Plant XXXX
Order Type XXXX
Availability Check 2
[X]Status Check
[X]Check material availability when saving order (may not need)
Checking Rule PP PP checking rule
Component Check Type ATP check
Release material 2 Release permitted despite missing parts
Then in COHV you try to mass release the order with the following parameter:
List: Order Header
Selection: Your selection criteria
Mass processing:
Function: Release
Max. No.of Processes 99
Save Log: Always
Release control order: Collective Order Release
Then after the order is released, you can find the missing part list of that order in CO03 menu path:
Goto->Missing Parts->Missing parts list
Hope it helps.
Regards,
Rachel -
Production Order missing Part list error date 1,857 is not convertable
*Dear Experts*
When i m trying to check missing part list at production Order then system is showing the error
The date 1,857 is not convertible (please correct) in Production order Missing part list.
Rgds
Pankaj AgarwalDear ,
System is throwing you this message beacue your FC calander is vaild till 2010 and asking you to put the date btn FC valid from 2004 and FC valid to 2010.
Goto -OP03-Select the Factory Calnder Tab in change mode (pencil mode ) -Select the applicable calender chek box-Double click this -Extende the validit date till 2020 or beyond so that u will not face not only in this particular issue but in many other txn later on .
Agian -come back to OP03 main screen -Slect the Holiday calaner -Extende the same way and reassing in Factory calander
after this , do not forget to re-ssign this FC in respective plant in OP03-Plant assingment .
Try and revert back
Regards
JH
Edited by: Jiaul Haque on May 27, 2010 3:14 PM -
"missing part list" releasing process order, but the material there is
Hi dears,
Ive a strange problem.
When im going to release a process order, the system give me a missing part list.
The strange is the material indicated in that list, a component of a phantom, is present in state free in the st. location indicate.
Does anybody know what can be the problem?
Thanks in advance,
JuanHi all,
the problem was that the material was present in quantity lower than safety stock.
For this reason, the system give me that advice.
however thanks for the help.
Best regards,
Juan -
Missing parts list at planned order level
I have tried to use comac t-code for checking the missing parts list at planned order level. but no log has been generated. pls advise. Is there any way to do the same?
Hi,
Use MDVP, i think it should meet your need.
If helpful award points
Regards,
Vivek -
Dear GTS Experts,
While creating sales order I am getting Sanctioned party list blocked, but I am able to create delivery, and PGI.
Where Is the wrong ?
Thanks a lot
Venu gopalDear Venu
Based on your message shown in the system, can you check the field in Control Settings for System Reaction in the Document type settings via Application Levels in the feeder system. This Field '' System Response in Feeder system if SAP GTS fails'' should be maintained with ''A''. I think in your case it could be 'Blank'' Thats why the system is allowing you to create the subsequent documents accordingly.
Please let me know if any further inputs required. -
Condition tab in display mode while creating sales order.
Hi Guys,
When I go to create a sales order the condition tab shows all the condition types in grey, irrrespective of its being manual or mandatory. I know it has nothing to do with V/06 or standard pricing transactions. So I changes the item categry.Again used the same order type, same customer , same material and same sales area. Once I change the item category to Zxxx, Condition tab becomes changeable. So I concluded that item category is the culprit. But the question is Which part of item category is influencing it ?
Please help.
Regards,Hi Phani,
While creating sales order (VAO1), I go to item level and click on condition tab. I see all the things in this tab grayed. Nothing is changeable. I changed the item category, while the pricing procedure was same as the old one. Condition tab became changeable. So it has something to do with item category. But what is that one thing missing in my item category which is making condition tab grayed out..?
Regards, -
Hi,
We would like to send the missing parts list generated from CO24 to other system. Is there any standard IDOC available to send missing parts?
I would appreciate your help.
Thanks.Karthik,
Thanks for your quick reply. But this is not what I am looking out for. I am sorry, I think my question was not clear.
There is one functionality in Production Planning area that we can find out the missing parts for the production order. We have to send the information to our warehouse asking for the missing parts to fulfill the production order. Our warehouse is not on SAP so we want to send the information through an ALE/IDOC. In order to do this I wanted to know that is there any standard IDOC type which can be used or we have to create a custom IDOC.
Thanks. -
Price not picking while creating purchase order
hi all,
i have created a pricing procedure and assigned to the vedor, but while creating purchase order the material price is not picking up.if i use the standard one the price is picking up. can anyone explaing any setting iam missing.
regards
thyagarajanHi
In your pricing procedure
For the condition type Automatic Gross price PB00, you have assigned am Access sequence.
<b>Access sequence</b>: An access sequence is a search strategy by means of which the system searches for valid records in various condition tables. It consists of one or more accesses. The sequence of accesses controls the priority of the individual condition records among each other. Through the accesses, the system is told where to look first and where to look next for a valid condition record in each case.
Once the pricing procedure triggers, System looks for the valid condition recorrd for the condition type PB00 as per the priority listed in Access sequence.
Example: If purchase info record is the first priority and you maintained the Info record then system picks the price from Info record into PO.
If no valid condition record found then it will trigger PBXX Manual Gross price condition in PO and ask to enter the price manually.This is called condition technique.
So check whether you maintained the Condition record for PB00 or not?
Regards
Ramakrishna -
Co24 missing parts list does not show material with shortage
Dear All,
I have a following problem: a production order with status MSPR which has 2 components in the missing parts list from availability check (inside that PO).
In Co24 tcode system does not show any missing parts for the same production order.
For these missing parts i have shipping notifications with an exeption message 10: "bring process forward".
My question is why Co24 does not show missing parts while they are shown in the production order if click on ATP check button.
Is there any interconnection with expection messages to bring process forward?
Thanks for your help!
Regards, AndreyIt seems that at the stage when atp check was run last time there were no reciepts for missing parts. When i was doing ATP check in production order i didn't save results thus respective table was still containing old results.
After i saved results of ATP check in production order missing parts were dispayed in Co24 as expected.
Maybe you are looking for
-
How to disable the Taskbar in Windows 8.1 completely...??
can any one help me in disabling the taskbar completely in a windows 8.1 tablet.
-
I'm using MainStage in a scenario that requires a number of quick patch changes in tightly scripted music. In one particular situation that change is so tight that I want to assign one of the keys on the (piano) keyboard to change the patch. That is,
-
Why does my exported swf show more content than actually on frame?
Why does my exported .swf show more content than actually on frame? My problem is relatively simple, though, I had some trouble finding a solution to it: When I play my exported animation using flash player in Google Chrome, if the window is bigger t
-
How do I fix lost presets and non-working scripts?
About two weeks ago I attempted to use a curves preset (CS5 up to date) and discovered that the choices had disappeared and all I was left with was default and custom.I found that this applied to all other presets. 6 hours on the phone with Adobe tec
-
Hi, my name is Cathy Pack and i am in a pickle, i have an i-Mac OS X version10.5.8, 1.25ghz power G4, every thing is fine except for my home screen it is in letterbox forme and i would like to put it in full screen, the screen is long and narrow inst