Missing the User Extensible Policy

Hello,
I don't know if this is the right forum.
We are missing the User Extensible Policy when we are creating a User
Policy packet
When we create a new User Policy packet we have all the options except the
User Extensible Policy. We need this to redirect folders. We did this on
other networks without any problems.
Network:
Netware 5.1 sp6
Zen 3.2 sp2
Tested on:
Windows 2000 (NwClient 4.83 sp1 and sp3)
Windows 98 (NwClient 3.21)
ConsoleOne 1.3.3
ConsoleOne 1.3.5
The pcs and the servers are the same on every network.
Greets,
Bert Nieuwenampsen
[email protected]
ROC Twente Plus
Dr. D.H. Groen College

bnieuwenampsen,
> Is not a ConsoleOne snapin that we are missing, because we copied the
> Consoleone from the 'working' network.
>
> How can we check witch snapin is installed on the server ? We checked
> NWconfig view install products, and they are the same.
In consoleone you would go to help and then snapins, but that can be
very confusing.
Easiest way would be to download the snapins from novell.
download.novell.com under products select zenworks for desktops from
there you can get the 3.2 snap-ins.
Extract the download and copy the snap-ins to your c1 copy, it would be
best if you were running c1 local on your workstation.
Q, when you copied c1 from the working location, did you copy the whole
1.2 directory to your desired location?
Jared L Jennings
Novell Support Forums SysOp
Using XanaNews 1.16.3.1

Similar Messages

NT User Extensible Policy - what am I missing ?

Hi,
NT4SP6a Workstation, NW Client 4.83
Zen 3.2 on NW6SP3 server.
I have created one simple user.
Then I created a User Policy Package, including a DLU policy and a User
Extensible Policy, in which I disabled "Registry editing tools".
I have assigned my policy to my user :
- the DLU policy works fine, my user is created at login, in the user group
I've chosen
- unfortunately, the user has access to regedit, and the parameters I
modifiy in the common.adm policy does not seem to be applied.
What did I miss ?

I once noticed a strange behaviour you might want to check.
When working in the policy package, I associated the policy package directly
to users.
It failed to apply.
I looked at the user for associated policies and it was empty. I can't
really remember whether or not the new policy association showed up in
effective policies or not. I suspect not.
So I worked from the user screen and associated the policy and it worked.
Maybe that will work for you.
Chris Denby
IT Coordinator
Rainy River District School Board
Fort Frances, Ontario
Canada
<[email protected]> wrote in message
news:CfvHd.655$[email protected]..
> Hi,
>
> NT4SP6a Workstation, NW Client 4.83
> Zen 3.2 on NW6SP3 server.
>
> I have created one simple user.
>
> Then I created a User Policy Package, including a DLU policy and a User
> Extensible Policy, in which I disabled "Registry editing tools".
>
> I have assigned my policy to my user :
>
> - the DLU policy works fine, my user is created at login, in the user
group
> I've chosen
> - unfortunately, the user has access to regedit, and the parameters I
> modifiy in the common.adm policy does not seem to be applied.
>
> What did I miss ?

LMS 4.2 compliance reports for the User-Defined Policy Groups.

Dear team,
I need your help to know if i will be able to export compliance reports in PDF or CSV for the User-Defined Policy Groups.
I have checkedk the reports tab and i was able to export compliance reports in PDF format inly for the system defined policies but i couldn't i find any option to export these reports for the a user defined compliance policy.
Kindly let me know if this is possible.
Regards,
Muhannad

Dears,
Do anyone have an idea about this question?
Regards,
Muhannad

Customizing User Name Policy OOTB Plugin

Hi
I want to use the User Name policy generation plugin to generate the user id for an oim user. But the requirement is that we have to create the User ID with Preferred Name(not with first name) and Last Name and the issue is that in the code we cannot get the attribute other then the attribute coming in the HashMap. So the question is , Is there any way in which we can pass this UDF to that hashmap or can get the value in the code?
Please note Preferred name is a UDF and coming from the trusted Source.
Thanks in Advance

Maybe i've partially solved the issue, I've noted that during the user creation procedure the username field is mandatory in the for so I must specify a value.
Maybe the validation procedure of the OOTB username policy returns alway a true value so the field is always converted in UPPERCASE and the username generation rule is never called
How can i set a non mandatory account name field ?

OU Group Policy over-riding User Group Policy

I'm using ZfD 4.01 ir7 and have a restrictive Group Policy applied at the
OU level. I've created a less restrictive Group Policy and assigned it to
a user within the above mentioned OU but the settings are not
taking...the OU Group Policy is over-riding the user Group Policy. The
appropriate rights have been assigned and this configuration is working
for other users/OUs in the tree. I've run a dsrepair against this
partition and no errors were reported.
Any suggestions to resolve this would be greatly appreciated.
Ryan

Paulr,
It appears that in the past few days you have not received a response to your posting. That concerns us, and has triggered this automated reply.
Has your problem been resolved? If not, you might try one of the following options:
- Do a search of our knowledgebase at http://support.novell.com/search/kb_index.jsp
- Check all of the other support tools and options available at http://support.novell.com in both the "free product support" and "paid product support" drop down boxes.
- You could also try posting your message again. Make sure it is posted in the correct newsgroup. (http://support.novell.com/forums)
If this is a reply to a duplicate posting, please ignore and accept our apologies and rest assured we will issue a stern reprimand to our posting bot.
Good luck!
Your Novell Product Support Forums Team
http://support.novell.com/forums/

ISE 1.1.1 - User Accept Policy keeps returning

Hello there
I have an ISE 1.1.1 setup, with a guest portal. The AD can be used to log onto this portal, and the Guest Portal Policy Configuration is on First Login.
However, every time a AD user logs in on the portal, he has to accept the User Accept Policy. Is this a bug? Or is there a configuration error?
Greetings

Steve,
It should be able to redirect users based on the username and device that they are authenticating from, if you look at the endpoint there is an attribute that is AUP specific once that is set to yes, the profiling database should have this flag set so it isnt redirected to the AUP after login.
In your authorization profile is the client being redirected to another authorization policy after CoA?
Please post screenshots of the authorization policy, the endpoint attribute, and the authentication events....
Thanks,
Tarik Admani
*Please rate helpful posts*

User group policy turns "display last user" to "ON"

Hello to all,
I distribute a simple local user group policy to turn off the "Action Center" at the System tray.
Every time I do this, the "last...

Search policy includes groups.
User is only in one group.
Still the same problem.
The tree is very simple, one O and one OU. All policies and users are in
the OU.
Ian
"Ian Russell" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:hn_Tc.3065$[email protected]..
> Hi Craig,
>
> I will check that out. It may be the multiple group membership that is
> causing the problem....
>
> "Craig Wilson" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]..
> > 1) Check to make sure you have a search policy defined and that search
> policy
> > includes groups.
> >
> > 2) Make sure that ONE and only ONE group a user is assigned to has a
> policy
> > assigned. Multiple Group Memberships that contain policies will result
in
> > seemingly random results. Due to the complex nature of events when
users
> belong
> > to multiple groups that contain policies, Novell actually recommends
> against the
> > use of policies for groups. It can be done, but just be sure the limit
is
> > maintained.
> >
> > Ian Russell wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > > I have ZfD3.2 (SP3) on a NW 6.0 (SP5) server. The user group policy
does
> not
> > > get applied to members of a NetWare group. If I apply it to a user
> object it
> > > works.
> > > Any ideas?
> > > Ian
> >
> > --
> > Craig Wilson
> > CNE3, 4, 5 - MCSE - CCNA
> > NSC Sysop (http://support.novell.com/forums/)
> >
> > Tech Writer - http://www.ithowto.com
> > (I Peter 4:10)
> >
> >
>
>

Status LIS9 of the User interface MP000200 missing

Hi All,
While creating leaving action. System is giving error (Status LIS9 of the User interface MP000200 missing.
Mentions below are my configuration.
Infogroup
COP 0001 Org assignment
LIS9 0002 Personal Data
LIS9 0006 address
LIS9 0105 Communication
And Personnel Action type are:- 0 0 0 MSN20 (Tick) (Tick) (Not tick)
Let me know how to resolve it.
Regard
Ashish

Hi,
make sure that LIS9 should not be used to the Infotypes which are having Time Constraint 1
Check V_T582A for time constratints and also check V_T588D to remove the operation LIS9 forLeaving/ termination action.
for your information
Infotype 0002 should NEVER be delimited as part of the Leaving Action.
The help text for the Operations field of the Info Group states the following:
In the Leaving action, use the "delimit" (LIS9) operation to delimit records.
Please remove the infotype 0002 from the info group, then run the leaving action, you will not find an error message
The reason why you get the error is because the status LIS9 does not exist on MP000200 .
You can see this via the menu painter via SE41.
regards,
mohammed
Edited by: 0mohammed1 on Oct 14, 2011 1:51 PM

Not able to see the users in Authorization Policy Manager

I have configured a OID provider in the myrealm of weblogic for OES Server. I also added the following lines to jps-config.xml
<serviceInstance provider=”idstore.ldap.provider” name=”idstore.ldap”>
<property value=”oracle.security.jps.wls.internal.idstore.WlsLdapIdStoreConfigProvider” name=”idstore.config.provider”/>
<property value=”oracle.security.idm.providers.stdldap.JNDIPool” name=”CONNECTION_POOL_CLASS”/>
<property name=”idstore.type” value=”OID”/>
</serviceInstance>
Even then I cannot see any of the users from the OID through application policy manager.
Anybody aware of any other settings that need to be done ?
oes server version is 11.1.1.6. and OID is 11.1.1.5.
Any help will be appreciated.
Edited by: ssarkar on May 10, 2012 1:15 PM

externalize the users.

Missing a User access in the log-on picture

Lacks a user access to log on picture after start-up in Yosemite. In user administration there has been created two user entries - an administrator and a normal access. The normal access is not visible from the log on picture, and it is only possible to access through the visible user (Adm.) and then switch the user by switching in the upper right corner!!!
Wish, possible for all users to log on from the boot up image. (Adm - Normal - Guest access)

same issue:
retina MacBookPro mid2012. Clean install of OS X Yosemite 10.10
I'm randomly missing an account at login screen after reboot.
Sometimes I can fix it with booting into my initial account 'Kevin' (userid 501) and then changing to different login 'Christina' (userid 502).
But if I log out from my account, the second account is missing. Same if I do a reboot.. This have me in stitches as I ofcause has the need for privacy from each account.
Both accounts are set up as admins, guest is deactivated.
rMBP 16gb sep2012.
userid 501:
home directory: /Users/Kevin
userid 502:
home directory: /Users/Christina
apart from that... I have loads of problems with Bluetooth, and hand-off only working 1 way (5s with 8.1) where only iOS -> OS X works, not vice-versa.

The user '*' preference item in the 'User - 6th Form Students Policy {E03166E7-A848-48B5-AA93-97B848AA9C13}' Group Policy object did not apply because it failed with error code '0x80070003 The system cannot find the path specified.' This error was suppres

I am looking at an issue with users not getting specific group policies.
After searching a number of client computers I found that the following error
The user '*' preference item in the 'User - 6th Form Students Policy {E03166E7-A848-48B5-AA93-97B848AA9C13}' Group Policy object did not apply because it failed with error code '0x80070003 The system cannot find the path specified.' This error was suppressed.
I can find the folder in the Sysvol folder on all of the domain controllers.
The issue with end users seems to be that the proxy settings for internet explorer is not being applied.
Potential problems?
one folder in sysvol entry is empty
\\<server>\SYSVOL\<domain.name>\Policies\{E03166E7-A848-48B5-AA93-97B848AA9C13}\User\microsoft\IEAK\LOCK
or is this our issue
The old method of configuring proxy settings to Internet Explorer 9 has changed?
https://support2.microsoft.com/kb/2530309?wa=wsignin1.0
http://thommck.wordpress.com/2013/11/08/the-new-way-to-configure-internet-explorer-proxy-settings-with-group-policy/

Hi all
In administering this policy I am a little confused.
We have a policy that distributes proxy settings in the internet explorer maintenance settings section - however when opening this policy up in GPO editor the internet explorer maintenance section is not present.
I plan to apply the settings via User/preferences/control panel settings/ internet settings (or registry settings from article) however I am unable to edit the settings for internet explorer maintenance and these will persist. Ideas????

I have a Win7Pro SP1 PC locked down with a Group Policy as it is a public facing PC. PDF fillable forms cannot be completed when logged on as the restricted user. The forms work as a normal user. What are the user requirements/permissions needed to fill f

I have a Win7Pro SP1 PC locked down with a Group Policy as it is a public facing PC. PDF fillable forms cannot be completed when logged on as the restricted user. The forms work as a normal user. What are the user requirements/permissions needed to fill forms?

Well, try this (I was able to fix my with these steps):
Go Utilities > Disk Utility
Select your Startup Disk, e.g. Macintosh HD
Then, under the First Aid Tab, click Verify Disk Permissions.
If there are errors, then click repair Disk Permissions.
After it is done, restart the computer and see if your problem is resolved.
I hope this help.
Zeke
www.ZekeYuen.com/blog/

Missing the "none" option in presets when adding user

SL Server, fully updated
When I go to add a user, I am missing the preset 'None" I have 6th grade, 7th grade, 8th grade and Faculty. Why would the None option be gone, I thought that was always there.
Thanks in advance

Did you follow the instructions on that page exactly when creating the account (the instructions won't work with existing accounts) ?
e.g. if currently signed into an account then you signed out of it, and you then found a free app and clicked on its free 'price' :
And then clicked on 'create Apple id' on the popup that you get :
When I tried those steps in response to another thread a few days ago I got the 'none' option on the payments screen

Some how I missed the set up assistant on my mac mini now I can't set up user accounts as I don't have a password ...help

some how I missed the set up assistant on my mac mini now I can't set up user accounts as I don't have a password ...help

Hmmm, did it come with an Install Disc? What OSX version is it?
I wonder if this old method still works...
Reset OS X Password Without an OS X CD...
http://theappleblog.com/2008/06/22/reset-os-x-password-without-an-os-x-cd/
It'll boot like a newly setup Mac, if it works.

Is there a way to give a local user permission to add a local user using the local group policy editor?

I need to find a way to have the local administrator of a Windows Server 2012 system grant a local user (non-administrator) the ability to add a user for the machine using the local group policy editor. The machine is not part of any Active Directory environment,
this is strictly on the one machine. In my situation it is not an option to just make the user an administrator. The idea is to give someone the right to add a user and have no other such administrative rights. I need to accomplish this using the
Local Group Policy editor or the Group Policy Management Console if it is possible to do this outside of an active directory environment. This is not an assignment to learn how to use these tools and I am not even sure if it would even be possible though I
need to either find a way or find proof that it is not possible using these applications.

Hi,
Sorry for the delay reply.
So did you want to non-admin user have the ability to add another user?
As far as i know, we cannot add the user if we have no local admin permission, we will receive the error"Access denied".
Regards.
Vivian Wang

Missing the User Extensible Policy

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for