Mission Control and 64bit JVM

Is there a problem running Mission Control on a 64bit OS. Specifically I have a Java app (a Coherence cache server) that I can run on 32bit Windows and I can see the process in the "discovered/local" part of the tree in Mission Control. I can then connect to the JVM, see the MBeans etc... When I move the cache server to a 64bit Windows Server 2003 box that has the 64bit version of JRockit installed I can nolonger connect Mission Control to it.
I am running a 32 bit version of Mission Control locally on the 64bit machine, is that the issue?
Nothing appears in the "discovered/local" part of the tree but I am able to create a new connection specifiying the JMX host and port. When Mission control attempts to connect I get this error:
Could not open Management Console for localhost:8001.
java.rmi.ConnectIOException: error during JRMP connection establishment; nested exception is:
     javax.net.ssl.SSLHandshakeException: Received fatal alert: handshake_failure
java.rmi.ConnectIOException: error during JRMP connection establishment; nested exception is:
     javax.net.ssl.SSLHandshakeException: Received fatal alert: handshake_failure
     at sun.rmi.transport.tcp.TCPChannel.createConnection(TCPChannel.java:286)
     at sun.rmi.transport.tcp.TCPChannel.newConnection(TCPChannel.java:184)
     at sun.rmi.server.UnicastRef.invoke(UnicastRef.java:110)
     at javax.management.remote.rmi.RMIServerImpl_Stub.newClient(Unknown Source)
     at javax.management.remote.rmi.RMIConnector.getConnection(RMIConnector.java:2312)
     at javax.management.remote.rmi.RMIConnector.connect(RMIConnector.java:277)
     at javax.management.remote.rmi.RMIConnector.connect(RMIConnector.java:227)
     at com.jrockit.console.rjmx.RJMXConnection.setupServer(RJMXConnection.java:498)
     at com.jrockit.console.rjmx.RJMXConnection.<init>(RJMXConnection.java:137)
     at com.jrockit.console.rjmx.RJMXConnectorModel.getOrCreateConnection(RJMXConnectorModel.java:608)
     at com.jrockit.console.rjmx.RJMXConnectorModel.<init>(RJMXConnectorModel.java:113)
     at com.jrockit.mc.console.ui.actions.StartConsole$1.preConnect(StartConsole.java:36)
     at com.jrockit.mc.browser.utils.PreConnectJob.run(PreConnectJob.java:73)
     at org.eclipse.core.internal.jobs.Worker.run(Worker.java:55)
Caused by: javax.net.ssl.SSLHandshakeException: Received fatal alert: handshake_failure
     at com.sun.net.ssl.internal.ssl.Alerts.getSSLException(Alerts.java:174)
     at com.sun.net.ssl.internal.ssl.Alerts.getSSLException(Alerts.java:136)
     at com.sun.net.ssl.internal.ssl.SSLSocketImpl.recvAlert(SSLSocketImpl.java:1657)
     at com.sun.net.ssl.internal.ssl.SSLSocketImpl.readRecord(SSLSocketImpl.java:932)
     at com.sun.net.ssl.internal.ssl.SSLSocketImpl.performInitialHandshake(SSLSocketImpl.java:1096)
     at com.sun.net.ssl.internal.ssl.SSLSocketImpl.writeRecord(SSLSocketImpl.java:623)
     at com.sun.net.ssl.internal.ssl.AppOutputStream.write(AppOutputStream.java:59)
     at java.io.BufferedOutputStream.flushBuffer(BufferedOutputStream.java:65)
     at java.io.BufferedOutputStream.flush(BufferedOutputStream.java:123)
     at java.io.DataOutputStream.flush(DataOutputStream.java:106)
     at sun.rmi.transport.tcp.TCPChannel.createConnection(TCPChannel.java:211)
     ... 13 more
I downloaded the 64 bit version of Mission Control but after running the install there is no way to start MC and just a readme saying Eclipse RCP is not supported on this environment.
Thanks,
Jonathan.

Hello,
I seem to remember an issue cropping up recently with 32-64 compatibility and local connect. As a workaround, try:
1) Start your 64-bit JVM with remote mgmt and autodiscovery enabled (-Xmanagement:ssl=false,authentication=false,port=7091,autodiscovery=true)
2) Use the 32-bit JRMC
This configuration will cause JRMC to communicate over a TCP socket, and the will still be autodiscovered by JRMC but as a "remote" JVM.
Regards,
Henrik

Similar Messages

Since upgrading from Mavericks to Yosemite Mail, Spotlight,Mission Control and App-Store don´t work correctly. Is it possible to return to Mavericks?

Since upgrading from Mavericks to Yosemite Mail, Spotlight, Mission Control and App-Store don´t work correctly. Is it possible to return to Mavericks?

If you have an external drive with an OS X Time Machine backup, then do restore of your last backup. If you have an external drive with a bootable clone of your previous system, you can boot to that clone and re-clone the OS X on your external drive back to your Mac's internal drive.
If you do not have either of these available, then the reverting/restoring process becomes much more complicated and involves purchasing an external drive and backing up your current system to that drive, then erasing, reformatting your hard drive and now your only options to installng an OS X version is doing a clean install of OS X 10.6 Snow Leopard, then upgrading, again, to either OS X 10.7 Lion or 10.8 Mountain Lion. OS X 10.9 Mavericks is no longer available for download and Apple has not made OS X 10.9 Mavericks available in any other form to be able to redownload and install.
Maybe it would be better to explain in detail your issues with Yosemite to see if any of us here can help you with your difficulties.
I am not running or using Yosemite, so I cannot help you with your Yosemite issues,
There are others here who can help you with Yosemite.
Good Luck.

Macbook pro w/ Mavericks - right command and right option functioning as shortcuts for mission control and show desktop

Hello,
All of a sudden my right command and right option keys are functioning as shortcuts for mission control and show desktop respectively. I haven't changed anything and can't seem to find any shortcut option in system preferences to change it. Control + up still works for mission control as default, and F11 is still show desktop. Left command and left option are working as normal.
Any suggestions? I have a feeling theres some silly little thing I've missed...
Thanks.
B.

Hello benja_d
That is an interesting issue with the keyboard. To help isolate the issue, open up the Keyboard view to see if there are any keys being held down while you are typing to see if that is the issue. You will also will want to try this in another user on your computer to see if it something that is User specific or system wide. Let me know if you have figured out this part and I can help you further.
One or more keys on the keyboard do not respond
http://support.apple.com/kb/ts1381
Regards,
-Norm G.

Mission Control and the dock -- strange behavior

Go to Mission Control and click on an open application's dock icon: Lion acts very erratically. It might switch the right app. It might switch to some other app.
Note: Have a couple of full-screen apps, like Safari, Mail or iTunes, open.
This is driving me crazy. Since the dock isn't displayed in full-screen apps, I tend to do the four-finger-up gesture to get to the Mission Control screen to get to the dock to switch to another open app. I recognize that there are other ways to switch apps, but shouldn't this way work work, too?

I feel your pain. "Over 250 exciting new features" was the promise. I, literally, have found ZERO new features that are useful. Yes, that's right---not a single one.
And for the record....I am a long-time Apple fan, and Apple addict. My first computer was in 1985 and it was an Apple. Every computer ever since has been Apple. I've never had a complaint---until now. I'll just say it in plain English---Lion is GARBAGE. I have found absolutely, positively, nothing useful about it---zip, zero, nada! Now I'm trying to figure out how to get rid of this junk and put Snow Leopard back on. Apple should be ashamed---this is pitiful. And my computer has NEVER EVER crashed before (well, okay..I'm sure it has at some point over the last 26 years..but I don't recall when). But now my computer crashes at least 3 times per day. Un-fricking-believable.

Trackpad is presenting a bug to open and close windows, mission control, and to move/roll the application (App) up and down.

Totally out of the blue, my trackpad is presenting a "bug". Every time that I try to open and close my mission control, or in the moments that I move / roll up and downs the Applications Screen, my Mac freezes for less than a second.
It never suffered any damage (NEVER!)! I am feeling very frustrated because I have no idea about what could cause such problem.
My MacBook Air is running OS X 10.9.5.
Any help will be very welcome!

Well, it all really depends on the custom program and how it was written. Does it have an ActiveX interface? If it does, than that's the easiest way to go. If you put an automation refnum on the fron panel, you can right click and it and choose Select ActiveX Class>Browse. The browser will list all of the ActiveX type libraries that are registered on your system. If you can find one that refers to your custom program, then you should be able to use it's methods and properties to control. If it does not have an ActiveX interface, then things get much more difficult.

Mission control and separation of windows

When going into mission control you can tell for example if you have 5 ms word windows but they are all stacked on top of each other. Can they be more organized like when you right click and hit show all windows?
Also when dragging in mission control can you achieve the same goal making the dragged window stay in that spot and not allow it to move back apart from putting it to a new desktop?
Thanks.

I found what is causing the problem, and solved also the other problem I had with locking the screensaver in System Preferences
Very simple, now that I tried everything for days
I used a different password for my keychain
If I use the same one for both my login and the keychain everything goes back in place
and works!

Mission Control and desktops .. can I do this?

So I am setting up 3 desktops.
One is for my music program
one is for my websites
and one graphic design eg Photoshop
Is there any way to have safari in desktop 1 and 3 but not on 2?
Right now I can only find the option of it being in one or all.
So for instance I want to have music websites on one desktop already open and then graphics websites already open on another desktop
then I can just sitch using the control - arrow function (using mission control of course).
Right now it only allows safari on one desktop or on all and when in all.. the same open windows appear in all desktops.
Any suggestions?
Thanks

Thanks Barney,,

Command opens Mission Control and can't over ride it

Everytime you hit cmd every window resizes pulling you out of the app you were in and unable to use any shortcuts! Really annoying.
The cmd key alone isn't assigned to any shortcut in system preferences>keyboard>shortcuts, nor is it assigned to anything in mission control?!
Restore defaults doesn't solve it.
Really at a loss so any thoughts really appreciated.

Sounds like you've got something else running that is messing with Mission Control. Do you have anything like 'Total Spaces' installed?
If not, the first thing to try is open Terminal (Applications > Utilities > Terminal.app) and type or paste this command into the Terminal window:
killall Dock
Then press 'return' on the keyboard. You should see the Dock disappear for a second or two then reappear. Now go and test Mission Control. Same problem?

Mission Control and Docked items?

Hello. I recently upgraded to Mountain Lion from Snow Leopard. Back in Snow Leopard, Expose would reveal docked items in my window array. Now, with Mission Control, docked items are not included. I can't find a setting that will bring this function back. Not a huge deal, but I kind of miss it. Anyone know how to make it happen?

Have you launched the System Preferences app and selected the Misson Control tab? There you can set the preferences and my first guess is that the preferences were reset (for some reason) to nothing.

Mission Control and Expose Problems

All of a sudden my mission control gestures have stopped working. Three fingers up did expose all the windows, but not all the desktops. After restarting my computer, the three fingers up or down doesn't work at all, and the launchpad doesn't make the background disappear as it used to. I tried multiple ways of fixing the issue, including turning all the gestures off and restarting and turning them all back on. Can anyone help me fix this? It is a real pain. Also, three fingers side to side still switches between the desktops.

Four fingers does bring me to mission control, but there is no bar at the top that shows the desktops that I have made. Also, sometimes it glitches and all the windows disappear for a few seconds until I go back and forth across all the desktops a few times. I remember when I went into launchpad before the windows I was working on would fade away, and they don't do that anymore either.

How to change Mission Control and Notification Center grey background on Mavericks?

Has anyone found a solution that works, to this day?
I've been able to change the login, dashboard and launchpad backgrounds (launchpad I actually only un-blurred with OnyX)...so they now all look like my desktop wallpaper.
But I can't manage to find an actual solution for MC and NC, yet. It would be nice if Notification Center could be even just black or maybe restored to linen, don't know, but not that ugly *** grey!
Does anyone have any new tips?
Or is it true that the MC grey backgroud is done with code, therefore not changeable? Seriously hope not!
Thank you.

Nope.

Everytime i use mission control and use the 3 finger swipe up it appears jagged, and seems to stutter?

the issue has only occured since updating to 10.8.2

i downloaded something called xbench ran that and the problem was solved, infact it cleaned up my entire mac and now runs smoothly

My MacBook Pro is stuck in Dashboard overlay. When I opened the case this morning there it was. I did not enter this mode and cannot get out and back to the desktop. I have tried Mission control, but it will not open, escape doesn't work either.

I have a MacBook Pro running Yosemite.I did not shut down the computer last night. When I opened the computer this morning Dashboard in overlay was on the screen. I have not been able to get out of dashboard. I have tried esc, F12, and accessing System Preferences in the Dock. I clicked on Mission control and nothing changed. Help be get back to my desktop.

     Did you try restarting the computer?
    Delete com.apple.dashboard.plist file.
    Quit all applications.
    Option click the "Go" menu in the Finder menu bar.
    Select "Library" from the drop down.
    Library > Preferences > com.apple.dashboard.plist
    Right click on it and select "Move it to Trash".
    Restart.
    If this doesn’t help, Put back the com.apple.dashboard.plist
    Right click the Trash icon in the Dock and select “Open”.
    Right click the com.apple.dashboard.plist and select “Put Back”.

MISSION CONTROL, LAUNCHPAD, and FULL SCREEN APPS (one month later)

I'm pretty good embracing a new thing when it comes along. I downloaded LION the day it come out, which was over a month ago at this point. On that day, I immediately found MISSION CONTROL and LAUNCHPAD both uninituitve and pointless. Unhandy iCandy. And of FULL SCREEN APPS? Not necessary on an iMac anyway.
So I quickly sought out quick solutions to 'fix' these new features. Launchpad and full screen apps have the advantage that they can be simply ignored. This is a good thing. Mission Control, on the other hand, got in the way of a beloved feature for me: what was once SPACES and EXPOSE. That is, I couldn't simply ignore MC because I still needed the previous helpful features in Snow Leopard.
My solution was kind of surprising and eye-opening. It's complicated to explain but I thought I'd share. This conclusion is likely best suited for someone not using a small screened Mac. It turns out that most users (with big enough screens) don't really need Mission Control, Launchpad, Spaces, or Full Screen apps.
At all.
Let's go through that conclusion, one by one:
FULL SCREEN APPS
If you have a relatively big screen (20 iMac for instance), why do you need Safari full screen? Unless you intend to sit across the room from the computer, no reason. And there's lots of bright empty space when you do this. Do you need the Mail app full screen? If you need reading glasses, maybe, but otherwise, nope. I find it's easier just to stretch out an app pretty big and leave it at that.
Full screen apps DO offer a nice feature which is making your desktop, menubar, and dock go BYE BYE. I can see where sometimes this is a useful feature, but typically -- NOPE. Typically I want access to my dock (to switch between open apps without the added step of cancelling full screen first), and typically I want access to my menubar so that I can glance up and see what time it is or find an app menu quickly.
The only feature I find worthy of praise with full screen apps is that they hide the clutter on your desktop. But there's an app in the Mac App Store which makes your desktop icons vanish with the touch of a button (CAMOUFLAGE). I mean, what's the point of a wallpaper if you bury it with desktop clutter or eliminate it with full screen apps? If it's a busy and distracting wallpaper, umm... you picked bad wallpaper.
LAUNCH PAD
LAUNCH PAD offers an iOS experience inside OS X. At first I thought it was completely silly. After a month now, I kinda get why it's there. Kinda.
You see, before LP, to duplicate it's functionality, you'd have to organize folders yourself. Put folders of various apps together. Place them somewhere in the finder heirarchy. Then drag those folders into the part of the dock with the trashcan. Then you could click them open and have access to similarly themed folders of apps. The problem here, of course, is that unless you're a power user, you'll never do this.
So Apple thought, AH-HA, we'll just drag into OS X a paradigm that users already get from iOS. Clumping apps together any way you like them. The misfire, if you ask me, is not allowing users to drag the new iOS folders straight into the dock when finished. That is to say: copies of said organized folders. It's as if Apple's software people have complete contempt for the dock -- and are desperate to have users abandon it.
My problem is that I like having folders in my dock of stuff I need. It just works, as Steve says. Going to the same EXACT place every time I need anything is more intuitive and graceful than ADDING an app called Launchpad that launches you into a different finder altogether. Makes zero sense and THIS is why I say, like FULL SCREEN APPS, LP can basically be abandoned.
By the way: need proof that Apple has complete contempt for the Dock?
MISSION CONTROL/SPACES
A month has passed since MC was introduced and SPACES was eliminated. I dare anyone to tell me why either is needed at all. Before you get iMiffed, humor me for a moment and hear me out.
The notion of SPACES was that it's a neat way to keep like minded open apps together. I totally bought into this, back in the day. So much so that I was iMiffed when it was gone in Lion. But let's look at this closer.
The REASON why we needed SPACES was that we could have WAY too many windows open at once on a Mac. Right? A big mess of windows covering each other up. Suppose you're surfing in Safari but need iTunes? But iTunes is hidden. So what did you do? You went to Spaces as step one, moused over to your iTunes space as move two, and then clicked it as move three. Seems like a great solution until the day you discover that you could simply click on iTunes in the dock as move one and arrive at iTunes. As one step. Period. Really simple, right?
Why have Spaces and apps dance around when you can just click the app you want and be done with it? That's the critical observation to make in order to follow my entire line of reasoning. Sure, it may look really cool and make Windows machines look like junk, but at the end of the day, why add two steps to something you might do 100 times a day -- switching between apps.
So why OH why did Apple add Spaces? Simple: because too many apps were visible at once in one 'desktop' window. So if you can build many new desktops, there might only be one or two in each. Great solution. Right?
Wrong, as it turns out. Because we still have the two extra steps. It's a weak solution. And it's in complete contempt of the Dock, which as it turns out, offers the strongest solution.
The strong solution would be that only one app is visible in your Mac's window at all times. Say you're in Safari. Despite having 12 other apps open, you only see Safari. Your dock tells you that you have other apps open, but nothing else sits in your window BUT the app you're using. So you want to go to iTunes? So click on it in the dock and Safari vanishes and iTunes emerges by itself. No other windows. What could be simpler? (This app is freeware known as ISOLATOR.)
If you download and try ISOLATOR, you'll say, umm, okay, but wait: sometimes I do want more than one window in view. Okay, fine, turn it off then. From the handy menu bar menu. I find that 98% of the time I need ISOLATOR on. Mileage may vary.
So let's recap. One third party software removes distracting desktop clutter, the other removes distracting app windows. Both can be toggled on and off from the menu bar. One is free, one costs $2. These two solutions remove the only real feature of FULL SCREEN APPS and make SPACES and it's newfangled cousin MISSION CONTROL pointless.
Need that last one explained? Well, what's Mission Control but a variant of spaces? To invoke MC and switch to the needed window are those same two annoying steps Spaces added into the mix. Nothing was fixed. Plus, like spaces, you must invest time and energy organizing such spaces.
Why bother? And so I ask again: can somebody who's read and tried the above carefully explain to me why Mission Control, Launchpad, and Full Screen Apps are really needed at all? (Outside of small screened Macs.) Doesn't the dock and these two sharewares together solve most problems?
Am I missing something?

I agree with everything you said about full screen apps, mission control and launchpad. For apps that made sense to run full screen, they already could under SL. Launchpad is totally unnecessary and Mission Control is a mere shadow of Expose and Spaces.
However, I feel you have not given due credit to Spaces. The point of Spaces is to let one organise logical desktops for different tasks, not just a way to reduce the number of windows on display. For example, I have a Space for software development where I run Xcode and the iPhone simulator, a Firefox window showing perhaps documentation or some other websites pertaining to software development, a Finder window that is opened in the folder with my design docs. I have another Space where I have the remote login sessions, yet another Space with another Firefox window where I do general surfing and emailing. I can switch between these spaces using a keyboard shortcut, which is much quicker than having to lift my hand off the keyboard, move it over to the mouse, move the mouse pointer over the Dock, find the app and click on it, only to find that it has switched to the wrong window of the app.
Without Spaces, organisation of my desktop is disrupted each time I want to switch task, whereas Spaces allows me to drop everything I am doing, go and do something completely different for a while and go back to my exact previous environment. I have a 27" iMac so am not short of screen space but I use Spaces extensively. BTW, switching Spaces using a keyboard shortcut is a lot faster on SL than the equivalent on Lion, thanks to the gratuitous screen animation of the latter.

1 OSX Lion Mission Control vs Snow Leopard Expose can't we combine the two (by leaving older Expose options inside) and get Apple back to leaping forward again?

So I am a web/software developer and I am having major beef with OSX Lion's Mission Control. While I think Mission Control and Application Windows are interesting additions to the multi-tasking nature and scheme of the OS, removing the older Expose Spaces and All Windows is a huge mistake. Couldn't Apple have just left all of the old stuff in? Then the system would be complete. As pretty as Mission Control and Application Windows is, the older Snow Leopard Spaces and Expose moved much faster and tamed all of my apps in a very efficient way.
Here is why Mission Control is not as fast as Spaces and Expose:....
1. With Spaces all of the desktops and their connected monitors were consolidated to one monitor in which you can easily see everything going on from a birds eye view. You cloud easily drag open windows between them freely and even swap spaces. This was huge because you could see everything. You could even activate All Windows over Spaces and see everything..Mission Control will group everything but you can't move programs across desktops unless it's the main desktop to the little desktop. Nor can you move windows across monitors. This is frustrating. Also the desktop are split to their respective monitor so I no longer have a birds-eye key-map access.
2. All Windows is so necessary and slick. Mission Control or Application Windows can't quite keep up. If I have a cluttered desktop and hit all windows, I can get any window at any time no matter how buried it is. Application Windows is useful but only applies to the focused application…but what if it's buried? I have to activate mission control first, select one of the windows from the program group, then activate Application Windows to get to that window. Also if there are many windows open for an application, Mission Control cannot replace All Windows because they stack and you can't quite tell which of the windows you want is accessible in that stack.
The bottom line is, put both of them together! Keep the old functionality as an option, because truth be told, the old way of doing things is still considerably faster under heavy work loads. I would use the Snow Leopard expose features more often. There is still room for Application Windows and Mission Control, but even after re-training myself I feel I'm moving at 70% of the multitasking speed that I used to move at before using Snow Leopard Expose. I mean this legitimately, I develop using multiple OS's along with video chat and instead of being a leap forward, Lion is a step backward and that just isn't like apple, everything Apple has done has been leaps and bounds forward. Let's leap forward and not only have all the sweet new features that Lion offers, but combine with the productive features that really moved and maybe just integrate into Lion's style. Bottle that and you have something sweeter than Yoohoo.

I completely agree with airbnboy. I used to be able to quick organised different windows within the same app to different spaces (now "desktops" for no apparent reason). This worked very smoothly in expose/spaces. I'd use one gesture to get to spaces, then another for expose, and I'd have all my windows in all spaces visible.
Now, I can't even see all of my windows in specific to one desktop! The best I can do is double scroll to see *some parts* of the windows on a desktop. So now, selecting a window for a specifc app is huge pain.
Worse than this, on moving windows from a desktop to another in, Mission Control will change the ordering of the stacks (per app, not the windows in the stacks). Umm, what is the possible benefit there?
So, now there is no use of spatial memory - e.g. Window X for App Y was in the top left of all my windows in the top left space, and I want to move it now. It's no longer possible to see all app windows in a specific "desktop", and much more effort is required to move windows around.
Great, well done Apple. Can we please, please have Expose and Spaces back as an option? Or at the very least, some way to view all windows for a specifc app on a specific desktop - and by "view", I mean see the whole window, not just a tiny indicator of the window, or a slightly expanded stack that may not give enough context.
The only reason I "upgraded" to Lion was to get XCode 4.2.

Mission Control and 64bit JVM

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for