Mixed content - https and http

Guys and Gals -
I have a page that has mixed content - http and https. Users talk to my webserver
using https, which talks to the portal server using http.
The browser popups a warning saying that the site has mixed content. Is there
any way to prevent this warning from coming up? Anything I can do using a proxy
or something else?
Thanks
Niks

Neeraj Harlalka wrote:
It's probably not because your webserver is talking to App server on
http connection. It could be some images being referrenced from the
browser using non-secured protocol. Try using absolute path or code URLs
using jsp tags.
hope it helps
Guys and Gals -
I have a page that has mixed content - http and https. Users talk to my webserver
using https, which talks to the portal server using http.
The browser popups a warning saying that the site has mixed content. Is there
any way to prevent this warning from coming up? Anything I can do using a proxy
or something else?
Thanks
Niks

Similar Messages

  • Maintaining Sessions between http and https

    I have a web application in which I want my users to view the login page over SSL and send the login request via SSL also, but then I want to revert back to http://
    My problem is, and i've seen this problem on loads of boards with no real resolution, during the login I set some objects with in the session that are used to display information in other parts of the site... but the session object is being lost!!!
    I am using Tomcat as my web server, I saw an article on JavaWorld titled "mix protocols transparently in web applications", and apparently to over come this problem if you are using WebLogic 6.1 there is a parameter in the weblogic.xml file that must be configured, but I cant find a similar one on Tomcat!!!
    Thanks in advance

    Thanks a million for the answer, I have got it working now, but I had to do something a little different for any one else who experiances this problem I'll go through it... I set an attribute in the context which was named the the value of the current session id and contianed the session object. Then when leaving the login handeling in my dispatcher servlet I apended the session id to the url of the next jsp called. In this jsp then I retrived the "secure session" object from the context, this so far is what you suggested.
    But then I had to loop through "non secure session" object's attributes and set them in the "non secure session" object, that is I was not just able to reset the "non secure session" object equal to the "secure session" object as when I went on to the next page it was reset to the "non secure session" object again!
    The fact that the session object is changed when moving between http and https is (according to Tomcat buglist) a bug of Tomcat 4.1 and did not occur in tomcat 3.2

  • WCCP Configuration HTTP and HTTPS

    Looking for anyone that might have a clue in on this, im attempting to configure a pair of routers to use WCCP to redirect HTTP and HTTPS traffic to two content keeper devices. The network im building is going to be used for a guest internet connection where defining proxies on end devices would be unusable.
    I'll drop the configs in below but for now what i have are 2 cisco 3925 routers configured for HSRP. 2 content keeps running squid for the cache engine. with my current configurations, I have wccp web-cache and wccp service 70 configured (all 4 devices are available/usable in both services). this is a layer 2 setup. HTTP traffic is picked up and redirected to the content keepers without issue. https traffic does not appear to be detected by the routers. I have chosen not to use ACLS for WCCP and use the redirect in because we want to capture http(s) traffic from all hosts.
    for HTTP, I see hits counters rise on the router under show ip wccp, i see hit counters for the content keepers increase, i see http traffic on the firewall from the content keepers and I get the web page on the device
    For HTTPS I do not see hit counters under wccp increase, I do not see any traffic on the content keepers bridge, and i see traffic on the firewall from the hosts orginal ip address.
    interface0/2 internal LAN
    interface 0/0 content keepers (no WCCP commands)
    interface 0/1 gateway firewalls. (no WCCP commands
    ip wccp check services all
    ip wccp web-cache
    ip wccp 70
    interface GigabitEthernet0/2
    description To Lan
    ip address x.x.x.x
    ip wccp web-cache redirect in
    ip wccp 70 redirect in
    standby 1 ip x.x.x.x
    standby 1 priority 150
    standby 1 preempt
    duplex auto
    speed auto
    Global WCCP information:
        Router information:
            Router Identifier:                   x.x.x.2
        Service Identifier: web-cache
            Protocol Version:                    2.00
            Number of Service Group Clients:     2
            Number of Service Group Routers:     2
            Total Packets Redirected:            17999
              Process:                           0
              CEF:                               17999
            Service mode:                        Open
            Service Access-list:                 -none-
            Total Packets Dropped Closed:        0
            Redirect access-list:                110
            Total Packets Denied Redirect:       0
            Total Packets Unassigned:            0
            Group access-list:                   -none-
            Total Messages Denied to Group:      0
            Total Authentication failures:       0
            Total GRE Bypassed Packets Received: 0
              Process:                           0
              CEF:                               0
        Service Identifier: 70
            Protocol Version:                    2.00
            Number of Service Group Clients:     2
            Number of Service Group Routers:     2
            Total Packets Redirected:            0
              Process:                           0
              CEF:                               0
            Service mode:                        Open
            Service Access-list:                 -none-
            Total Packets Dropped Closed:        0
            Redirect access-list:                -none-
            Total Packets Denied Redirect:       0
            Total Packets Unassigned:            0
            Group access-list:                   -none-
            Total Messages Denied to Group:      0
            Total Authentication failures:       0
            Total GRE Bypassed Packets Received: 0
              Process:                           0
              CEF:                               0
    Show details and show service attached.

    Hello Josh,
    1. Yes, port-specific ACL is not supported. But it is not a big problem. Usually on WCCP server you can configure very specific bypass (Cisco WSA supports that - do not know about Sophos). For bypassed traffic WCCP server will reinject that packet in GRE and send back to ASA which will decapsulate it and send as normal packets.
    It's a good design, because you can have very granural bypass policy on WCCP server.
    2. Yes, configuration is correct, although it's better to be more specific (not send all traffic to WCCP if there is no need for that).
    3. Yes, you can use deny in redirect-list to exclude traffic.
    4. WCCP keepalives are being send by WCCP server by default every 10 seconds. If ASA does not see that replies for some time it marks server as dead and uses other ones.
    Michal

  • Clarification for HTTP and HTTPS Sender Adapter

    Hello together,
    after some investigating concering scenarios with HTTP and HTTPS sender there are still some points that are not absolutely clear for me.
    I know that it is not necessary to configure an HTTP sender communication channel. However if I want to enforce HTTPS sender communication I think I need to add an HTTP sender communication channel with security settings enabled as well as a sender agreement.
    To my understanding these settings are activated on the Adapter Engine (Java Stack), HTTP requests however call the ABAP stack directly. How does this work exactly?
    Thank you very much for your additional explanation.

    Hi,
    see below is the format for HTTP URL
    http://<hostname:port>/<path>?<query-string>
    now query straing can only have values as given in the below link
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/43/64db4daf9f30b4e10000000a11466f/content.htm
    a way around can be to specify the payload for &party or &agency or &schema(if you are not using them) but then XI should be able to identify them correctly(which i m not sure how it will do),secondly the length can be a constraint coz if you add the whole payload ,the URL will become really long.
    so i would suggest you not to use it but if you really have to,then explore it properly first and then only use
    plz reward points
    thnq

  • Switching between https and http requests

    Hi,
    Our application is built using ADF 10.1.3
    This application need to be integrated with an in house built single sign on system. ( SSO system is built in C# and .NET)
    This single sign on system only understand https request. Once user is validated against single sign on system, our application's authorization page is called in HTTPS mode. Once the user is authorized, he is forwarded to home page. While forwarding to home page, we want to convert the HTTPS request to HTTP.
    Currently once the user is authenticated, all requests are happening in HTTPS mode.
    We do not know how to make http request from existing https requested page.
    Any help is appreciated.
    Thanks
    Ranajit

    Hi,
    the way to do this is by redirecting the call from a PhaseListener or command button. The solution Avrom refers to is a PhaseListener that uses XML configuration file to determine whether or not the page you are navigating to requires https or http. The code that handles the protocol switch is printed below
      * Determines if the requested page requires SSL and if the current protocol
      * meets this need. If not the protocol is switched between http and https
      * @param viewId
      * @param pageRequiresSSL
      public void handleProtocolSwitch(String viewId, boolean pageRequiresSSL)
        ExternalContext exctx = FacesContext.getCurrentInstance().getExternalContext();
        boolean isSecureSSLChannel = ((HttpServletRequest)exctx.getRequest()).isSecure();
        // pages that require SSL and SSL is on, or pages that don't require
        // SSL but SSL is on and should be kept
        if (pageRequiresSSL && isSecureSSLChannel || !pageRequiresSSL && isSecureSSLChannel && isKeepSSLMode) {
        printDebugMessage("Page requires SSL = "+pageRequiresSSL+", channel is secure = "+isSecureSSLChannel+", is keep SSL = "+isKeepSSLMode);
        printDebugMessage("No protocol change required");
        // page requires SSL and SSL is not active. Switch to SSL.
        if (pageRequiresSSL && !isSecureSSLChannel) {
          printDebugMessage("Page requires SSL = "+pageRequiresSSL+", channel is secure = "+isSecureSSLChannel);
          printDebugMessage("Protocol change required to use https");
          switchToHttps(viewId);
        // switch to HTTP is page doesn't require SSL and channel isn't secure
        // and isKeepSSLMode is false
        if (!pageRequiresSSL && !isKeepSSLMode && isSecureSSLChannel) {
          printDebugMessage("Page requires SSL = "+pageRequiresSSL+", channel is secure = "+isSecureSSLChannel+", is keep SSL = "+isKeepSSLMode);
          printDebugMessage("Protocol change required to use http");
          switchToHttp(viewId);
        if (!pageRequiresSSL && !isSecureSSLChannel) {
          printDebugMessage("Page requires SSL = "+pageRequiresSSL+", channel is secure = "+isSecureSSLChannel);
          printDebugMessage("No protocol change required");
      * Switches from https to http using a redirect call
      * @param viewId
      private void switchToHttp(String viewId) {
          FacesContext facesContext = FacesContext.getCurrentInstance();
          ExternalContext exctx = facesContext.getExternalContext();
          ViewHandler vh = facesContext.getApplication().getViewHandler();
          String pageURI = vh.getActionURL(FacesContext.getCurrentInstance(), viewId);
          //redirect to http URL
          String remoteHost = getHostNameFromRequest();
          printDebugMessage("Switch to http on host "+ remoteHost);
          try {
              String port = httpPort.equalsIgnoreCase("80") ? "" : ":" + httpPort;
              String url = "http://" + remoteHost + port + pageURI;
              printDebugMessage("Redirecting to http URL "+ url); 
              //TODO check request Map
               this.printDebugMessage(" Content size of RequestMap before redirect "+exctx.getRequestMap().size());
              exctx.redirect(url);         
          } catch (IOException e) {
              printDebugMessage("Redirect to http port failed "+ e.getMessage());
      * switches to https using a redirect call
      * @param viewId
      private void switchToHttps(String viewId) {
          FacesContext facesContext = FacesContext.getCurrentInstance();
          ExternalContext exctx = facesContext.getExternalContext();
          ViewHandler vh = facesContext.getApplication().getViewHandler();
          String pageURI = vh.getActionURL(FacesContext.getCurrentInstance(), viewId);
          //redirect to https URL
          String remoteHost = getHostNameFromRequest();
          printDebugMessage("Switch to SLL/https on host "+ remoteHost);
          try {
              String port = httpsPort.equalsIgnoreCase("443") ? "" : ":" + httpsPort;
              String url = "https://" + remoteHost + port + pageURI;
              printDebugMessage("Redirecting to https URL "+ url);       
              //TODO check request Map
              this.printDebugMessage(" Content of RequestMap before redirect "+exctx.getRequestMap().size());
              exctx.redirect(url);         
          } catch (Exception e) {
              printDebugMessage("Redirect to http port failed "+ e.getMessage());
      * @return the hostname of the page request
      private String getHostNameFromRequest() {
          ExternalContext exctx = FacesContext.getCurrentInstance().getExternalContext();
          String requestUrlString = ((HttpServletRequest)exctx.getRequest()).getRequestURL().toString();
          URL requestUrl = null;
          try {
              requestUrl = new URL(requestUrlString);
          } catch (MalformedURLException e) {
              e.printStackTrace();
          String remoteHost = requestUrl.getHost();
          return remoteHost;
      }If your container doesn't support session sharing between http and https then the session is renewed. In OC4J you will have to configure this.
    Frank

  • HTTP and HTTPS (SSL) at the same time?

    Hi
    In our company we will use SAP Portal as a external facing portal and as portal  that uses authorisation and authentication (logon) . The question for us is: Is it possible to run the EFP without SSL and the “securede  portal” with SSL? Where do I find documentation?
    Thanks
    Christian Thulstrup

    Hi Christian,
    yes, you can run the portal with HTTP and HTTPS at the same time - it's just a question of the URL you are entering in the browser...
    <b>BUT:</b>
    If you access your portal with HTTPS <b>all</b> content provided by the portal should be accessed with HTTPS too - otherwise you will get security warnings in IE and maybe some strange behavior of the integrated content. Session Management to SAP backend systems will not work also...
    Vice-versa: if you access you portal with HTTP all content should be accessed with HTTP... obviously...
    So if your content for the external facing portal is completely seperated from the internal content - yes you can access the portal with differen protocolls.
    If it is not seperated - and that includes KM objects also - then better use one protocoll for both only!!
    Hth,
    Michael

  • PORTAL ACCESS  THROUGH HTTP and HTTPS BOTH

    Hi,
    Is it possible to make the portal listen on both http and https ports at the same time? What is the required configuration for the same?
    Please let me know for any other details.
    Any input is highly appreciated.
    regards,
    Chandra

    Hello Chandra,
    you can activate SSL in the J2EE engine and then you have both Protocolls avaliable. The documentaiton can be found at <a href="http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/f1/2de3be0382df45a398d3f9fb86a36a/frameset.htm">Configuring the Use of SSL on the SAP J2EE Engine</a>.
    Regards
    Gregor

  • How to protect both access (http and https) with a Policy Agent

    Hi,
    During the installation of a web Policy Agent (i.e. Policy Agent for IIS) we have to choose the protocol (and port) of the web server we want to protect.
    If we have an IIS with secure (https) and non secure (http) applications, how we manage this scenario with the policy agent?
    Regards,

    Hi,
    Finally, i have installed the agent in IIS5 in the non secure port (http) and in fact it detects both access (http and https) fine.
    The problem now is that if i try to access to a non secure url ( http://mynonsecureapp.com ) all works fine, the agent redirects to https://myaccessmanager.com:443/amserver/UI/Login?goto=http://mynonsecureapp.com but when i try to access to a secure url ( https://mysecureapp.com ) the agent try to redirects me to: https://myaccessmanager.com:443/amserver/UI/Login?goto=http://mysecureapp.com (notice that the agent removes the 's' in the url).
    The amAgent log file shows:
    +2008-07-17 09:44:08.296MaxDebug 656:d8f6b0 PolicyAgent: am_web_is_notification(), https://sigcit.agp.gva.es:443/fullcitriweb is not notification url http://sigcit.agp.gva.es:80/amagent/UpdateAgentCacheServlet?shortcircuit=false.+
    +2008-07-17 09:44:08.296 Warning 656:d8f6b0 PolicyAgent: OnPreprocHeaders(): Access Manager Cookie not found.+
    +2008-07-17 09:44:08.296 Debug 656:d8f6b0 PolicyAgent: am_web_is_access_allowed(): url 'https://sigcit.agp.gva.es:443/fullcitriweb' path_info ''.+
    +2008-07-17 09:44:08.296MaxDebug 656:d8f6b0 PolicyAgent: am_web_is_access_allowed(): processing url http://sigcit.agp.gva.es:80/fullcitriweb.+
    +2008-07-17 09:44:08.296 Debug 656:d8f6b0 PolicyAgent: am_web_is_access_allowed(): client_ip 172.27.65.62 not found in client ip not enforced list+
    Any ideas?
    Regards,
    Edited by: idm_oceanic on Jul 17, 2008 1:33 AM

  • JSF / Switch between HTTP and HTTPS

    Hello!
    I want to switch between HTTP and HTTPS using JSF.
    Under Apache Struts framework I can use struts extension "sslext.jar" to configure switching between http and https in one web application.
    e.g. Login-jsp should be secured, all other jsp's should run unsecured.
    Any ideas?
    regards
    Harald.

    Thanks,
    I made the necessary enhancement for the second phase, password confirmation required when return to SSL zone after leaving it after a succesful login.
    I did the following:
    1) create a class in the application scope and/or singleton class with the servlet paths that require SSL
    2) create a plugin that reads ActionConfigs from the ModuleConfig
    3) create a filter that sets a request scope flag that says that password must re-entered.
    Code Extracts:
    1) MainshopContainer application level parameter singleton class:
    private static HashMap sslZoneMap = new HashMap(50); // key = servlet path of request, example /login.do
    public boolean isInSSLZone(String servletPath)
    return this.sslZoneMap.containsKey(servletPath);
    public void addToSSLZone(String servletPath)
    this.sslZoneMap.put(servletPath,null);
    public int getNumberOfActionsInSSLZone()
    return this.sslZoneMap.size();
    2) Struts plugin
    add a call to loadSSLZoneMap in plugin init method:
    loadSSLZoneMap(config, mainshopContainer);
    private void loadSSLZoneMap(ModuleConfig config, MainshopContainer mainshopContainer)
    throws ServletException
    try {       
    ActionConfig[] actionConfigs = config.findActionConfigs();
    for (int i = 0; i < actionConfigs.length; i++)
    if (actionConfigs.getParameter().indexOf("/jsp/account/") < 0) // /account/* = URL path for SSL zone
    // not found = not ssl zone
    System.out.println("loadSSLZoneMap, following actionConfigs excluded from SSL Zone: "+actionConfigs[i].getPath());
    else
    // found = ssl zone
    String servletPath = actionConfigs[i].getPath()+".do";
    mainshopContainer.addToSSLZone(servletPath);
    System.out.println("loadSSLZoneMap, following servletPath added to SSL Zone: "+servletPath);
    System.out.println("loadSSLZoneMap, number of actions in SSL Zone: "+mainshopContainer.getNumberOfActionsInSSLZone());
    catch (Exception ex)
    ex.printStackTrace();
    throw new ServletException("Exception caught in loadSSLZoneMap: "+ex.toString()+" Initialization aborted.",ex);
    3)
    public void doFilter(ServletRequest request, ServletResponse response, FilterChain chain)
    throws IOException, ServletException {
    HttpServletRequest req = (HttpServletRequest) request;
    HttpServletResponse res = (HttpServletResponse) response;
    String servletPath = req.getServletPath();
    boolean secure= this.mainshopContainer.isInSSLZone(servletPath);
    The wole picture:
    The filter adds a RequestDTO object that includes all request parameters, one of them is the secure flag.
    I have a session scope class UserContainer that includes all the session parameters, one of them is the lastRequestDTO.(last made request)
    At the end of all my jsp's I set the lastRequestDTO variable.
    In that method I set the passwordConfirmationRequired flag if needed:
    public void setLastRequestDTO(RequestDTO _lastRequestDTO)
    if (this.lastRequestDTO != null && this.lastRequestDTO.isSecure() != _lastRequestDTO.isSecure())
    this.setPasswordConfirmationRequired(true);
    this.lastRequestDTO = _lastRequestDTO;
    I read the passwordConfirmationRequired in all my jsp's in the SSL zone that allow editing or deleting and if that flag is true, a valid password must be re-entered in order to make the updates.
    When the password is OK I reset the passwordConfirmationRequired to false.
    I need some help for the first phase, that is SSL setup for all actions related to jsp's with url path /account/*
    I tought I could define it in the web.xml:
    <security-constraint>
    <web-resource-collection>
    <web-resource-name>All Account Related Pages</web-resource-name>
    <url-pattern>/account/*</url-pattern>
    </web-resource-collection>
    <user-data-constraint>
    <transport-guarantee>CONFIDENTIAL</transport-guarantee>
    </user-data-constraint>
    </security-constraint>
    but that doesn't work and finnaly understood why:
    Example: /WEB-INF/jsp/account/login.jsp corresponds to /login.do
    The url pattern /account/* at the container level is never encountered.
    Is it allowed to declare the following action path: /account/login instead of /login?
    If yes I could add following prefix /account to all my action paths and forward paths and this could resolve my problem.
    What's your opinion?
    If no, would your library resolve this?
    Will all the Struts/JSP/JSTL url generating tags pick-up the required protocol (http/https) according to your configuration file?
    Regards
    Fred

  • In OS 10.6 and Safari 6, http: and https: are no longer displayed.

    In OS 10.6 and Safari 6, http: and https: are no longer displayed.
    Can this behaviour be restored??
    In 10.5.8 with Safari 5.x some sites will show up as https: while the same
    site in Safari 6 may, or may not, show the grey or green box https: box.
    Is this this a certificate problem?
    Can I set the address bar to for the URL prefix?
    I have both systems on separate disks and consistantly see this behaviour on some sites.
    How can I feel assured that a site is or is not secure using Safari 6??
    A relative also shares this same issue
    Thanks for your Help!

    Safari 6 : http is not shown in the URL (& Search combined) bar, but https is always shown, often with a symbol lock. The URL address font is black, after the / it is grey.
    All as expected.
    Best.

  • Configuring WCCP for http and https

    How do I configure wccp on a 6509 to redirect http and https trafic to a S650. I am using the following config and http is working fine:
    ip wccp version 2
    ip wccp web-cache redirect-list aclwccp
    interface Vlan23
    description Rede Firewall
    ip address 10.0.23.20 255.255.255.0
    ip access-group 172 out
    ip wccp web-cache redirect out
    mls rp vtp-domain coc_block1
    mls rp ip
    mls netflow sampling
    end
    Should I config an other service for the https protocol?

    Cecato,
    The WSA can be configured to send 80 and 443 traffic, in the WCCP settings area (5.2.0+). There are some things you will need to be aware of before doing this though:
    1. If you are on 5.2.0-x, you will not be able to inspect HTTPS traffic. Only version 5.5.0+ has the ability to decrypt HTTPS traffic. Because of this, it is not recommended to redirect port 443 on WSA version 5.2.
    2. You will most likely need to specify a service ID other then web-cache. On most Cisco devices, web-cache is reserved for port 80 traffic only and cannot be changed. Any other service ID will work as you want it to.

  • Separate Tomcat http and https access

    Hi
    I got tomcat running both http and https.
    However, http://localhost:8080 and https://localhost:8433 are accessing the same page.
    I need to separate them, to prevent from entering data using http://localhost:8080 by mistake.
    Please help.
    Cheer
    T

    there are 2 ways to only allow https access to your webapp
    1:
    stop tomcat listening on all ports except https port
    2:
    configure your webapp to only allow https access
    http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=tomcat-user&m=104951559722619&w=2

  • Both http and https on struts in tomcat using SSL

    I want to apply both http and https as need, on a single web application on struts. My server is tomcat. I need a complete documentation. Some help me please.

    If you are terminating SSL on ACE then there is no way to do it with one policy because of ssl-proxy command. However it is possible to use same serverfarms with two VIP like this:
    access-list ACL line 10 extended permit ip any any
    rserver host TEST
      ip address 20.20.2.11
      inservice
    serverfarm host TEST
      rserver TEST
        inservice
    ssl-proxy service SSL_SERVER
      key KEY12.PEM
      cert CERT12.PEM
    class-map match-any SSL
      2 match virtual-address 10.10.2.101 tcp eq https
    class-map match-any HTTP
      2 match virtual-address 10.10.2.101 tcp eq http
    policy-map type loadbalance first-match L7_POL
       class class-default
         serverfarm TEST
    policy-map multi-match L7
       class SSL
         loadbalance vip inservice
         loadbalance policy L7_POL
         loadbalance vip icmp-reply
         ssl-proxy server SSL_SERVER
        class HTTP
        loadbalance vip inservice
        loadbalance policy L7_POL
        loadbalance vip icmp-reply
    interface vlan 210
       ip address 10.10.2.1 255.255.255.0
       service-policy input L7
       access-group input ACL
       no shutdown
    interface vlan 220
       ip address 20.20.2.1 255.255.255.0
       no shutdown
    ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.90.15.1
    However, if you are not doing SSL termination on ACE and you are just doing L4 load-balancing, you will most likely need to configure SSL stickiness, which again leads to having separate policies because of the sticky serverfarms which need separate loadbalance policy lines.

  • Https and http configuration

    Hello All
    Can anyone tell me how to configure a website which contain both https and http pages? I mean for example, if you go to your online banking website, all the pages before you reach the Login page are in http. But once you have login, all the pages are under https.
    For my own project, I have also installed the SSL onto my Tomcat, it works fine. However, all the pages are under https, even the index.html page. Below is my server.xml, hope it may give you more information.
    Many thanks
    Viola
    ============================================================================
    <!-- Define a non-SSL Coyote HTTP/1.1 Connector on port 8081 -->
    <Connector className="org.apache.coyote.tomcat4.CoyoteConnector"
    port="8080" minProcessors="5" maxProcessors="75"
    enableLookups="true" redirectPort="8443"
    acceptCount="100" debug="0" connectionTimeout="20000"
    useURIValidationHack="false" disableUploadTimeout="true" />
    <!-- Note : To disable connection timeouts, set connectionTimeout value
    to -1 -->
    <!-- Define a SSL Coyote HTTP/1.1 Connector on port 8443 -->
    <Connector className="org.apache.coyote.tomcat4.CoyoteConnector"
    port="8443" minProcessors="5" maxProcessors="75"
    enableLookups="true"
    acceptCount="100" debug="0" scheme="https" secure="true"
    useURIValidationHack="false" disableUploadTimeout="true">
    <Factory className="org.apache.coyote.tomcat4.CoyoteServerSocketFactory"
    clientAuth="false" protocol="TLS" />
    </Connector>
    <!-- Define a Coyote/JK2 AJP 1.3 Connector on port 8009 -->
    <Connector className="org.apache.coyote.tomcat4.CoyoteConnector"
    port="8009" minProcessors="5" maxProcessors="75"
    enableLookups="true" redirectPort="8443"
    acceptCount="10" debug="0" connectionTimeout="20000"
    useURIValidationHack="false"
    protocolHandlerClassName="org.apache.jk.server.JkCoyoteHandler"/>

    True for my version of TOMCAT
    I think that if you check http://localhost:8080
    you will find that you can access your pages
    with out using http also.
    You are applying ssl to the server not the individual
    war files. So you can access the files using both
    https and http.
    What you need todo is set the security parameters of the
    war file that you want to access using https to only allow
    connection using https.
    So now you can access the web pages using http or https
    but you can only access the file with the security settings
    using https.
    Note if you are using sessions becareful you don't jump between
    http & https and leave the session id exposed.

  • IWeb protocol support for anything OTHER than http and https

    I am extremely disappointed in iWeb. It doesn't even seem to be able to do very simple things.
    All I want to do is to create HTML links to external pages with protocols other than "http" and "https" and it always prepends "http" to the beginning of the URL. This is really really really annoying.
    Apple I hope you are paying attention. iWeb is poorly designed. You are trying to anticipate what end users want...this is a development practice right from the Microsoft Windows Developer book. I sure how the next update to iWeb works properly. I'm so upset about all this...I can't publish podcasts to the web because of all the foolishness with how you handle that, and the confusing directory name issues.
    My podcast URL looks like this:
    http://itpc://www.mysite.com/podcast/News/rss.xml
    I tried (unsuccesfully) to manually create the podcast since the automated version created this:
    itpc://www.bradyconsult.com/podcast/podcast/News/rss.xml
    I'm sure I could fiddle with iWEb and get this to work, but why should I? I've already fiddled with it and simple changes to my site structure totally screw this up. Not to mention, that when it did work, it didn' t even post all my podcasts!!! It skipped the first one and the last one.
    And, for those wondering, i'm not technically clueless. I have a podcast working just fine on two other sites. The appeal to iLife with iWeb and the new podcast feature of GarageBand was to bring all this together in one easy to use, nice package. But it's not nice. Garageband's update is awesome! But iWeb and it's attempts to work with the other iApps is gruesome.
    I expect this garbage from Microsoft...not Apple.
    Can anyone recommend a workaround (and yes, I understand I can manually edit HTML...but I was hoping for a workaround within iWeb) to create html links with support for protocols (aside from http and https) ??
    It's bad enough I have to publish to a folder and then FTP to my site since apple makes that exceedingly difficult to do (I'm sure to increase .mac sales) but all this other foolishness is just bunk. I feel ripped off on my iLife '06 purchase.
    Grrrrrrr......
    G5 Dual 2.3 GHz   Mac OS X (10.4.5)  

    I don't know if this helps you any, but in my humble
    opinion Drake is absolutely correct. iWeb really
    wasn't designed for the pro site builder; it's just
    an entry level site builder. Moreover, it isn't
    really geared for the professional world of internet
    marketing; I think it is really more for the home
    and family group who have at least one thing in
    common: Macs.
    I don't think it was even designed for them. I mean, you can't create an ftp: link, you can't manage multiple site files, there's no way to add "aim:" or "yahoo:" links, etc. It's not mac's they're supporting. It's .mac in particular, maybe, if that.
    The art is kinda nice, but really, the grief in trying to do simple things like a basic href is just absurd. I can do these things easily in Pages. iWeb should certainly be no more difficult.
    Btw, I'm here because I have the same problem - overly restrictive URL's on hyperlinks. I'll probably solve my with a trivial sed script. But even that's tough because they mangle the url. It's not easy to find an encoding suitable for automatic post processing.
    Automator anyone?

Maybe you are looking for

  • DB12&DB13 access issue

    Hi, when user executes DB12, DB13 T-code , user is getting error "you are not authorised to execute transaction". but when he executed SU53 tcode getting report is showing object "S_ADMI_FCD" with value DBA in BI system. what could be the reason the

  • ITunes Troubles.. Lagging, Crashing.. FAILING!

    So i recently formatted my EXT HDD to split it into 2 partitions (for scratch disk purposes). I burned all 35GB of music, and proceeded to load back up once formatted. my first problem began when trying to playback all the music i put back on... a to

  • ITunes Home Server?

    I just got my new Thecus N2100 NAS with "iTunes Server Capability". Now the problem: The server shows up in iTunes with all the files - perfect. But how can I add files from here to my library? Drag and drop does not work, same with playlists. Just a

  • Landscape of Solution Manager

    Hi, All: My question is about the Solution Manager's Landscape. Normally, do we need 3-tier (DEV-QAS-PRD) landscape for Solution Manager implementation or only 1 Solution Manager to be installed is ok? Any info will be highly appreciated! Thanks! Bes

  • Gameloft not letting me sign in on tablet

    I'm trying to log in on game loft to play modern combat multilayer but it's not letting me