Mixing ACR 5.7 and 6.2

I grew quite fond of processing my RAW shots through ACR, accessed through Bridge CS4. I'm a Mac PSE user, and thought I got a pretty good trade: give up PSE Organizer, get full-featured ACR. "Expose to the Right," adjustment brushes, presets...rah!
Sadly, that gig is partially up: PSE8 ships with Organizer and de-featured ACR 6.2. Upgrading to full PS just to get full ACR is too expensive. So, unless I move to LR, I'm wondering what happens if I mix-and-match 5.7 and 6.2.  Use ACR 5.7 for initial workflow, including capture sharpening and most edits. For selected images that are the keepers (and/or merit PS editing), open in Elements ACR 6.2, change to PV2010, adjust sharpening and noise reduction there.
My two questions:
the noise reduction in PSE ACR 6.2 seems to be the improved stuff, correct? And no sliders for luminance and color detail, so are those effectively set to zero?
the PSE ACR 6.2 seems to read OK any of the changes made in 5.7 (adjustment brushes, graduated filters), so my guess is under the hood the XMP processing is pretty full-featured...anything that I should NOT do in 5.7 because the PSE version of 6.2 can't/won't read it?
thx

stewch wrote:
…The Bridge CS4 that I have came as part of PSE.
…and you're saying you think that gives you a full version of ACR 5.7? 
Wow !
You mean you see all nine adjustment tabs, all the subtabs and all the adjustment sliders in ACR 5.7?
1.— Basic   (11 sliders)
2.— Tone Curve
       (Parametric sub-tab 4 sliders; +
        Point sub-tab)
3.— Detail (5 sliders)
4.— HSL/Grayscale tab
       Hue sub-tab (8 sliders), +
       Saturation sub-tab (8 sliders), +
       Luminance sub-tab (8 sliders)
5.— Split Toning tab (5 sliders)
6.— Lens Corrections tab (7 sliders), including
       Lens Vignetting, and Post-Crop Vignetting
7.— Camera Calibration tab (7 sliders) +
       Camera Profile popup menu
8.—  Presets tab
9.— Snapshots tab.
This is certainly news to me.  Please confirm.
Wo Tai Lao Le
我太老了

Similar Messages

  • Is there a way of passing a mixed cluster of numbers and booleans to teststand

    Hi,
    I have a labview VI that contains an output cluster containing both numeric and boolean results and would like to pass this to Teststand. At the moment I have coverted all my boolean results to  '1/0'  so that I can create a numeric array and can quite easily pass this to Teststand (using multiple numeric limit test). 
    Is there a way to pass mixed results to Teststand and write in the limits (example PASS and GT 5V) or do I have to stick with what I have?
    Chris

    Which test step type to use depends on what you have to analyze - a boolean condition? String? Number(s)? I can't tell you because I don't know what's in your cluster. If you click on the plus sign next to the parameter name "output cluster" you will see all paramters and their types, which are passed from the VI to TestStand.
    You can either create a variable for the whole cluster, or you can assign all or just some values from within the cluster to variables.
    The name of the variable (Locals.xxxxxxx... or FileGlobals.xxxxx...) ist what you type in the value field. You can also choose the variable from the expression browser by clicking on the f(x) button.
    Are you new to TestStand, do you know how to work with variables in TS?
    Maybe the attached picture gives you an example, there I am assigning the values from VI output "VoltageOutputArray" to the TS variable locals.VoltageMeasurement.
    This variable ist used again on the tab "Data Source" as the Data Source Expression.
    Regards,
    gedi
    Attachments:
    stepsettings.jpg ‏89 KB

  • ACR 8.3 and D600 .nef Files

    I'm using a Nikon D600, shooting with a flaat picture profile to create both RAW and JPG files.
    I'm using: Adobe Bridge CC ver: 6.0.1. 6 x64 / Lightroom 5.3 / ACR 8.3 (I'm a CC user and I have all the current software available.)
    I have alot of experience with the workflow of Adobe Bridge->ACR->Photoshop using Photoshop CS3 extended version. I'm not sure what the Adobe Bridge Version would've been, nor ACR.
    Today, when I look at my .nef files in Adobe Bridge, they are heavily contrasted images. The .jpgs look flat, just like the profile I chose, but the .nef's look like a preset is being applied to them.
    I've read the forums topics about .nef files and Camera Profiles, but I've never had to change any preset when I used Bridge->ACR->Photoshop in the past. However, I did go into Adobe Bridge->ACR->Camera Calibration and changed the CAMERA PROFILE to "Camera Neutral" and  left the PROCESS as "2012(current)."  The "Camera Nuetural" DID help alot. But is that all that is available- or am I missing something?
    I thought there was (maybe) a problem with Adobe Bridge, since the images looked like the preset was applied even before I ever tried to open any of the .nef images. So I went into Lr and when I imported the images, they looked like I would expect them to- until I clicked on them. Then I could see the preset being applied. So, I went into Lr->Develop->Camera Calibration and the same 2 settings as mention above where there. So I left the PROCESS as "2012(current), and changed the PROFILE to "Camera Neutral". It helped alot, but is that all that I can do?
    Is that all I can do? It seems like too much is being changed on the .nef files without me ever touching them.
    Thanks for your help,
    Cathey

    Thank you Jim. I appreciate your help. I have seen the different profiles that can be applied and the Camera Neutral makes a huge difference in the .nef image (bringing it back to more of a flat image, which is what I wanted).
    I have the same issue in Adobe Bridge, and I can select the Camera Neutral from there as well and it makes about the same difference as in Lr.
    I've pulled up some older images that I shot with my D200 (I can't tell you what picture profile I shot with). It confirms what I remember from working with .nef files before I got my D600 and started using the CC versions of Lr & Br which is: The .nef files are, well... 'raw', while the .jpgs look 'refined'.
    In my case (now) its the complete opposite. My jpegs look 'raw' and my .nef's are punchy, contrasty, bright....
    I can't help but wonder why my .nefs are so changed when they're supposed to be raw files. Even when I apply the profile in Lr, or in ACR of "camera neutral" it still does not get me back to what (I believe) the raw image should look like. Why would a .nef look better than the .jpg when I haven't yet applied ANY setting to it. And, if it's the profile in ACR or Lr that is causing this to happen, then why doesn't the .nef image look at least as flat as the .jpg when I change it to 'camera neutral'?
    You said that Lr generates its own preview of the raw image data. I guess I don't understand why, then, when I change the image in Lr to Camera Neutral, how come I still have a .nef that is considerably brighter, more contrasty than the original .jpg?

  • When I mix JSTL 1.0 and 1.1 taglib declarations, it causes a ParseException

    When I mix JSTL 1.0 and JSTL 1.1 taglib declarations, it causes a ParseException on some of my servers, but not all of them.
    Here is the block of code that's giving me trouble:
    <%@ taglib prefix="c" uri="http://java.sun.com/jstl/core"%>
    <%@ taglib prefix="fn" uri="http://java.sun.com/jsp/jstl/functions"%>
    <c:set var="TEXTVARIABLE">|STRINGOFTEXT|</c:set>
    <c:set var="OTHERTEXTVARIABLE">${fn:contains(TEXTVARIABLE, '|STRINGOFTEXT|')}</c:set>And here is the exception :
    *javax.servlet.jsp.JspException: com.caucho.jsp.JspLineParseException: /WEB-INF/jsp/online/system/modules/com.MYCOMPANY.marketing/templates/common/MY_JSP_PAGE.jsp:1: tag = 'out' / attribute = 'value': An error occurred while parsing custom action attribute "value" with value "${fn:contains(TEXTVARIABLE, '|STRINGOFTEXT|')}": org.apache.taglibs.standard.lang.jstl.parser.ParseException: EL functions are not supported.*
    However, everything works fine if I change the URI for the core declaration to *http://java.sun.com/jsp/jstl/core*
    So here's the really weird part: for some reason, mixing 1.0 and 1.1 taglib declarations only causes an exception on two of my servers, my staging server and my production server. It causes no problems at all on my local machine or my development server. Why is this? What could possibly be causing this difference in behavior?
    The three servers are extremely similar in setup and configuration. The JSP page is being served up by OpenCMS 7, and I'm using the Caucho's Resin webserver. I understand that you don't know how my servers or CMS are set up, but really, what I'm looking for is ideas. Any ideas at all would help, this problem has been driving me absolutely batty. Even if you don't know what could be causing the problem, if you have any suggestions at all for how I could approach the problem, that would be extremely helpful. I just don't understand what could cause this difference in behavior between my servers.
    For reference, here's the first part of the stack trace (there's a character limit in this forum, so unfortunately I can't post the whole thing) :
    *javax.servlet.jsp.JspException: com.caucho.jsp.JspLineParseException: /WEB-INF/jsp/online/system/modules/com.MYCOMPANY.marketing/templates/common/MY_JSP_PAGE.jsp:1: tag = 'out' / attribute = 'value': An error occurred while parsing custom action attribute "value" with value "${fn:contains(TEXTVARIABLE, '|STRINGOFTEXT|')}": org.apache.taglibs.standard.lang.jstl.parser.ParseException: EL functions are not supported. at*
    *org.opencms.jsp.CmsJspTagInclude.includeActionWithCache(CmsJspTagInclude.java:369) at*
    *org.opencms.jsp.CmsJspTagInclude.includeTagAction(CmsJspTagInclude.java:241) at*
    *org.opencms.jsp.CmsJspTagInclude.doEndTag(CmsJspTagInclude.java:472) at*
    *_jsp._WEB_22dINF._jsp._online._system._modules._com__MYCOMPANY__marketing._templates._MAIN_0PAGE__jsp._jspService(_MAIN_0PAGE__jsp.java:153) at*
    *com.caucho.jsp.JavaPage.service(JavaPage.java:60) at*
    *com.caucho.jsp.Page.pageservice(Page.java:579) at*
    *com.caucho.server.dispatch.PageFilterChain.doFilter(PageFilterChain.java:179) at*
    *shared.filter.RemoteAddrFilterBase.doFilter(RemoteAddrFilterBase.java:57) at*
    *com.caucho.server.dispatch.FilterFilterChain.doFilter(FilterFilterChain.java:70) at*
    *com.caucho.server.webapp.DispatchFilterChain.doFilter(DispatchFilterChain.java:115) at*
    *com.caucho.server.cache.CacheFilterChain.doFilter(CacheFilterChain.java:175) at*
    *com.caucho.server.dispatch.ServletInvocation.service(ServletInvocation.java:229) at*
    *com.caucho.server.webapp.RequestDispatcherImpl.include(RequestDispatcherImpl.java:485) at*
    *com.caucho.server.webapp.RequestDispatcherImpl.include(RequestDispatcherImpl.java:350) at*
    *org.opencms.flex.CmsFlexRequestDispatcher.includeExternal(CmsFlexRequestDispatcher.java:194) at*
    *org.opencms.flex.CmsFlexRequestDispatcher.include(CmsFlexRequestDispatcher.java:169) at*
    *org.opencms.loader.CmsJspLoader.service(CmsJspLoader.java:1193) at*
    *org.opencms.flex.CmsFlexRequestDispatcher.includeInternalWithCache(CmsFlexRequestDispatcher.java:423) at*
    *org.opencms.flex.CmsFlexRequestDispatcher.include(CmsFlexRequestDispatcher.java:173) at*
    *org.opencms.loader.CmsJspLoader.dispatchJsp(CmsJspLoader.java:1227) at*
    *org.opencms.loader.CmsJspLoader.load(CmsJspLoader.java:1171) at*
    *org.opencms.loader.A_CmsXmlDocumentLoader.load(A_CmsXmlDocumentLoader.java:232) at*
    *org.opencms.loader.CmsXmlContentLoader.load(CmsXmlContentLoader.java:52) at*
    *org.opencms.loader.CmsResourceManager.loadResource(CmsResourceManager.java:964) at*
    *org.opencms.main.OpenCmsCore.showResource(OpenCmsCore.java:1498) at*
    *org.opencms.main.OpenCmsServlet.doGet(OpenCmsServlet.java:152) at*
    *javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:115) at*
    *javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:92) at*
    *com.caucho.server.dispatch.ServletFilterChain.doFilter(ServletFilterChain.java:106) at*
    *com.caucho.filters.CmsGzipFilter.doFilter(CmsGzipFilter.java:177) at*
    *com.caucho.server.dispatch.FilterFilterChain.doFilter(FilterFilterChain.java:70) at*
    *shared.filter.RemoteAddrFilterBase.doFilter(RemoteAddrFilterBase.java:57) at*
    *com.caucho.server.dispatch.FilterFilterChain.doFilter(FilterFilterChain.java:70) at*
    *com.caucho.server.webapp.DispatchFilterChain.doFilter(DispatchFilterChain.java:115) at*
    *com.caucho.server.dispatch.ServletInvocation.service(ServletInvocation.java:229) at*
    *com.caucho.server.webapp.RequestDispatcherImpl.forward(RequestDispatcherImpl.java:277) at*
    *com.caucho.server.webapp.RequestDispatcherImpl.forward(RequestDispatcherImpl.java:106) at*
    *com.caucho.server.dispatch.ForwardFilterChain.doFilter(ForwardFilterChain.java:80) at*
    *com.caucho.server.cache.CacheFilterChain.doFilter(CacheFilterChain.java:207) at*
    *com.caucho.server.webapp.WebAppFilterChain.doFilter(WebAppFilterChain.java:173) at*
    *com.caucho.server.dispatch.ServletInvocation.service(ServletInvocation.java:229) at*
    *com.caucho.server.http.HttpRequest.handleRequest(HttpRequest.java:274) at*
    *com.caucho.server.port.TcpConnection.run(TcpConnection.java:514) at*
    *com.caucho.util.ThreadPool.runTasks(ThreadPool.java:520) at*
    *com.caucho.util.ThreadPool.run(ThreadPool.java:442) at*
    *java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:595)*
    Thanks for your help!

    My simple and stupid solution: Don't mix the two :-)
    You are not meant to be able to use the JSTL1.1 functions with JSTL1.0.
    What version of JSTL have you got installed on your servers?
    I presume it is one of JSTL1.1 or JSTL1.2?
    What jar files are present? Are they all the same version on the different servers?
    What version of Resin are you using?
    Are there any entries in the web.xml file for JSTL (correct answer is: no. There shouldn't have to be)
    Do you have any JSTL tld files sitting around your web app (again the correct answer is: no)
    Deep in the source code of the JSTL 1.1 parser, is this snippet:
    String allowed = System.getProperty("javax.servlet.jsp.functions.allowed");
        if (allowed == null || !allowed.equalsIgnoreCase("true"))
          {if (true) throw new ParseException("EL functions are not supported.");}I'm not sure what would set this property, but it might give you a lead...
    My recommendation: Use JSTL1.1 rather than JSTL1.0, and don't try to mix the two.

  • Lightroom doesn't recognize ACR 5.5 and my D300s RAW images

    Lightroom 2.4 does not recognize my Nikon D300s RAW images. I downloaded ACR 5.5 and after install both Bridge and Photoshop CS4 handle the D300s RAW images but my Lightroom 2.4 will not import them saying that it is a damaged or unrecognized file type. I have rebooted my entire Vista system and the problem persists. Any suggestions on how I might make Lightroom recognize ACR 5.5 and my D300s RAW images? Thanks in advance.
    Harry Campbell

    Harry Campbell wrote:
    Any suggestions on how I might make Lightroom recognize ACR 5.5 and my D300s RAW images?
    You don't want Camera Raw 5.5 (unless you want to use Photoshop CS4), you want the DNG Converter 5.5 which can convert the D300 raws into DNGs that are compatible with Lightroom 2.4. The next version of Lightroom (presumable 2.5) will have the support built in without needing the DNG Conversion...

  • My external hard drives seem to be mixed up in lr4 and I don't know how to fix them

    My external hard drives seem to be mixed up in lr4 and I don't know how to fix them! Help!

    The file opened and cropped in photoshop was a camera raw file?
    In File>Save for Web pick Jpeg from the drop-down

  • Can all Acrobat Readers open files with mixed orientation pages (portrait and landscape)?

    Can all Acrobat Readers open files with mixed orientation pages (portrait and landscape)? If not, which versions can? Thanks!

    Hi Sami,
    You can open files with mixed page orientations in all Adobe Readers There is no such constraint on opening files with different page orientations in Adobe Readers.
    In case if you have any other query please let us know. We will be happy to assist you.
    Regards,
    Aadesh

  • ACR 8.5 and Nikon NEF: in Photoshop and Lightroom

    Today I was on Nikon presentation. A manager from Russian office sad that Nikon gave Adobe some information how to open NEF files CORRECTLY in ACR, but that algorithms can be used ONLY in Photoshop, not in Lightroom. Is that true or fake? As I know, ACR for Ps and Lr is the same in case color reproduction (and has some differences in image correction).

    To compare PS/ACR with LR, if you have both products, you can do an Export a TIF from LR and do a Save Image TIF from ACR, using the same parameters, and then open both in PS and layer one on top of the other, set the blend mode to Difference, merge the layers, and see if you have anything besides 0s for the pixel values of the combined layers.   You could stretch the image in Levels to make finding any non-zero pixels, easier.
    It has been said, above, that LR 5.x versions had a bug where they did not apply noise-reduction or sharpening in some situations during the Export so its important to understand what precise versions of the products you're talking about.  Intending for the raw-conversion algorithms to be the same, and a coding error making them not so are two different things.  In other words the mathematics would be the same, but the implementation in a different programming language by different people could have coding errors. 
    As far as which of Nikon Capture or Adobe Lightroom/PS-ACR is better, the words someone says or writes are a fact if you have the recording or original documents, but the idea they are communicating is an opinion and you can really only list pros and cons for someone else to draw their own conclusion, and unless you're quoting word-for-word, your interpretation of what is being said is also somewhat of an opinion, yours.

  • Mix of WS1.0 and WS 2.0

    Hi
    Can we use a mix of WS1.0 and WS2.0 for a particular object?
    We have "Views" defined for each object. But the childObjects like Relationships, Notes, Products and Attachements are not defined. Can we make use of both these features of WS2.0 and WS1.0?
    If So, How?
    If not why?
    How do I do CRUD for Child Objects like Relationshiops, Notes, Products, Attachements, Roles Etc?
    Please Help me with your answers
    Thanks,
    Vijay

    Hi Venkat
    Appreciate your qucik help. It was indeed a very sound answer but only half of that was answered.
    I want to construct a QueryPage using a mix of features of WS 1.0 and WS 2.0. For example, ViewMode Features of WS2.0 and intact Parent-Child Relationship of WS1.0?
    How can mix these two for a QueryPage method?
    Please help us iwth an example
    Thanks,
    Vijay

  • Strange Artifacts in ACR 3.7 and 4.0 and D70s NEF files???

    Hi to all. Yesterday i found strange bug in ACR 3.7 and higher (4.0). When open some of my D70s nefs some artiffacts appear in my images, especially in overexposed arreas. In ACR 3.6 and Nikon Capture this artifacts does not appear. What is wrong with this versions of ACR?
    ACR 3.6 converted image:
    http://img208.imageshack.us/img208/3420/acr36qx8.jpg
    [IMG]http://img208.imageshack.us/img208/3420/acr36qx8.jpg[/IMG]
    ACR 4.0, same image and convertion settings:
    http://img222.imageshack.us/img222/6792/acr40jv1.jpg
    [IMG]http://img222.imageshack.us/img222/6792/acr40jv1.jpg[/IMG]
    Nikon Capture NX, same image:
    http://img208.imageshack.us/img208/7800/capturenxjs5.jpg
    [IMG]http://img208.imageshack.us/img208/7800/capturenxjs5.jpg[/IMG]
    ACR 4.0, Another image, same problem:
    http://img222.imageshack.us/img222/7254/acr40secondni6.jpg
    [IMG]http://img222.imageshack.us/img222/7254/acr40secondni6.jpg[/IMG]

    > seems that problem is caused by CPU ...
    In the case of the Pentax files, it was Macs (OK) WIntel (NOT).
    I also forgot to mention that Thomas Knoll stated a fix would be forthcoming only for ACRv4 and lightroom versions. The symptoms are definitely the same, but you have to wonder if it's the same problem, and for which ACR versions a fix will be forthcoming.
    cheerios :)

  • Why doesn't the quality meter approve of any of my choices of master passwords, no matter how I mix both letters, digits and non-alphanumeric characters?

    I tried to create a master password, but it couldn't be done 'cause the quality meter never accepted any of my passwords, even though I used a very complicated mix of letters, digits and special characters as well.

    There are no requirements when setting Firefox's master password. The password quality meter is purely informative.
    If you're trying to fill the bar all the way, that's unlikely unless you create a lengthy password, or a very complex mix of special characters, digits and lowercase and uppercase letters. Keep in mind the master password should be easily remembered and typed in, time after a time. A highly secure password that is easily mistyped or forgotten is of no use.

  • Cautionary note re ACR 4.4 and Lightroom 1.4

    On the Adobe blogs, Tim Hogarty writes that ACR 4.4 and Lightroom 1.4 are being taken down:
    http://blogs.adobe.com/lightroomjournal/2008/03/important_lightroom_14_and_cam.html

    Try reading the blog...
    >The Lightroom 1.4 update for Mac and Windows has been temporarily removed from the Adobe.com web site....
    >....For those not in immediate need of the updated camera support available in Camera Raw 4.4 or the DNG 4.4 Converter, it's recommended that you also continue working with the 4.3.1 versions.
    There is nothing about ACR or DNG 4.4 being removed.

  • ACR 4.6 and PSE6 Organizer still crashes

    I posted this a long time ago for ACR 4.5 and I'm gonna do it again for CR 4.6. Please read below I'm still having the same problem with ACR 4.6 (BETA).
    I'm experiencing the following problem when I download ACR 4.5 to be used with PSE6.
    The problem is that the PSE6 Organizer crash when I try to open the Organizer Preferences. Aparently this only happens with Windows
    Vista because I know of other users with XP and they are not expiriencing this.
    I did try it with the original ACR 4.2 and works well.
    I did try it with the previous ACR 4.4 and works well.
    It only happens when you install the 4.5 and go to the Organizer's Preferences.
    And stills happens with ACR 4.6.
    When I contact the Adobe Customer Support they told me to wait until the new version of ACR, well I guess that nobody there analyze/investigate/test my issue.
    Regards
    Hector

    Héctor,
    I ran ACR 4.5 for a short while with Photoshop Elements under Vista Home Premium without ever seeing your problem.
    Being a Mac user accustomed to the full version of Photoshop, which I still use on my Mac desktop, I was so frustrated by the limitations of Photoshop Elements I was running on the Windows Vista laptop that I asked for a refund from Adobe (and got it too). But I never had anything crash on me while running ACR 4.5 on it.

  • ACR 4.6 and Elements 5 for D90?

    Hi,
    I have downloaded the beta ACR 4.6 and copied the Camera Raw.8bi file to:
    C:\Program Files\Adobe\Photoshop Elements 5.0\Plug-Ins\File Formats\
    It is correctly installed as when I open Nikon D40 .NEF files already in the Organiser it opens ACR4.6. However when I try and import Nikon D90 .NEF files I receive an error message saying the files are corrupt/not a supported format and therefore cannot be imported into the Organiser.
    Am I doing something wrong or is there a workaround?
    Thanks,

    Hi Jeff,
    Yes I use a card reader. It's not an issue with reading the card as I'm currently shooting the D90 as RAW+Fine JPEG. When I launch Elements Photo Downloader it shows me the NEF files + the JPEGS but only the thumbprint image for the JPEGs (The NEF files all have the same icon). It allow me to select both the NEFs + JPEGs for loading into the organiser but then fails to load the NEFs, saying the file is unrecognised or damaged.
    I can however open the NEFs from ACR4.6 within the Elements 5 editor. I'm assuming therefore that ACR 4.6/the editor are fine working with D90 NEFs but the 'Photo Downloader' part of Elements isn't.
    Any further thoughts?
    Cheers,
    Rob

  • Sony A300 ACR Defaults noisy and over exposed

    I have a A300, ACR 5.1 and Elements 6.0 I have recently compared three raw plugins, Adobe ACR, Sony's image convertor and Silkypix free. With the Sony s/w I turned off all automatic processing. The results are a surprise.
    The same raw file has much more noise when being opened in ACR and requires a great deal of exposure reduction to reduce highlights and get the highlight warning to disappear from within the plugin.
    When saved as jpegs from the various covertors the ACR is noiser and all settings seem too strong. On very noisey photos (or at least photo that look noisey from within ACR) it some times isn't possible to clean up the noise. It just doesn't seem ACR is doing a propper job of opening the Sony raw files.
    I do like the ACR plugin and it is much quicker than the Sony but at the moment there does a ppear to be a quality loss using it.

    OK, well I just tried this on a landscape image that is basically almost all high/mid frequency:
    Amount 150
    Radius 0.5
    Detail 0
    Masking 0 (although I would mask appropriately with any image)
    and then compared it to
    Amount 35
    Radius 0.5
    Detail 100
    Masking 0
    Critical viewing was at 100, 200, 300 and 400% in ACR.
    I am really surprised at this!  Although the sharpening is extremely close to the same amount in appearance (at 100%) the first settings with detail at 0, to my eye has a lot cleaner edges (less halowing) and definitely less artifacting in smoother areas (even w no masking).  Basically at the edges of the image there seems to be less feathering of pixels transitioning them (may interpolate up better this way?).
    I will do some more testing, to see how the file then handles Sharpening for Output (with the new datail at 0 settings).  I am thinking at this point that your detail at 0 idea might be sound. Less artifacting and cleaner edges seems to mean that the file will take more aggressive sharpening after up sizing it, and then the grain simulation I use to disguise the artifacting may be able to be a little less aggressive.
    Question, do you still approach the masking (ACR) the same way?
    Lastly, I tried using the first settings of sharpening on an image interpolated to max size in ACR (about 20MP) and then tried the same capture sharpening settings on an image at native size (about 12MP) then interpolated up to 20MP using PS Smoother (remembering that ACR applies the sharpening after the uprez). I have found the ACR uprez to have more detail at ultra zoom levels.  But if ACR applies the capture sharpening after the ACR uprez (if my reading is right, Jeff S said that) and the other is capture sharpened at native pixel size and then uprezzed with Bicubic Smoother, aren't I just comparing apples with oranges?  Also, when taking a image from 12.9 to 19.5MP is the ACR interpolating using its algorithm that is like Smoother?

Maybe you are looking for

  • Send Email with Excel attachment with formatting(bold, color) in Background

    Hi, I have requirement wherein I have to send an email with excel attachment with proper formatting of certain fields in the excel sheet like making it bold or setting different color. The data is available in an internal table. Just to to format it

  • Still image quality loss b/t viewer and canvas?

    When I import a still (I've tried jpg, tiff, etc), the image quality is perfect in the viewer, but as soon as I lay it down on the timeline it is blurred and foggy. What am I doing wrong? Please, any advice would be helpful, as this is for a job and

  • How do you hide error messages thrown by a dashboard

    OBIEE 10g; Anyone know how to edit error messages thrown by analytics. The text in many messages has been identified to us as a security vulnerability because the text contains sensitive information such as server host names and the logical queries t

  • Liquid photogallery

    Hi All Just trying to get my head around Liquid in particular for the module_photogallery. I wanted to create a better photo gallery than the current one in BC. One where i can create a custom layout instead of relying on the default table gallery vi

  • Changing expired password of "system" user

    Hello, today I got a message that said that "system"-s password is expired. I used sqlplus: sqlplus system/mypass@myserver:1521/dwh Then I got: SQL*Plus: Release 10.2.0.1.0 - Production on Wed Oct 14 12:05:50 2009 Copyright (c) 1982, 2005, Oracle. Al