MM Function Level Document

Dear All,
Any one provide me MM function level document like if we can do the process then first we create PR --> Release PR --> create PO -- > So on.........
I require all the process of MM modules.
Regards,
Sandip Shaktavat

Dear,
This link i have already. If you have any other document related to MM then please give me.
Regards,
Sandip

Similar Messages

Reason Code Functionality in document level

Dear Sir,
How to bring Reason codes functionality at document level while posting Debit Note or Credit Note in MIRO.
Syam

Hello Syam,
What Reason code are you referring to ? Due you mean to say blocking reason ?
regards
pbb

Workflow Functional Specification Document

Hi All
I am working on a implementation project which includes Workflows. Right now I am in the process of writing the functional specification document for the Workflows. I am a functional consultant and never worked on workflows.
Can some one provide me what should be included in the functional document , how should the flow be written.
Is there any sample Workflow template anyone can share.
There are 4 places that requires workflows according to my understanding as described below in my requirement:
1. Workflow for corporate users when a notification is created or closed
2. Workflow email, forward a complaint to
     Finance Manager
     Quality Manager
     Plant Managers
3. Workflow for forwarding to an approver, reassign task to someone else
4. Workflow to send remainder emails for open items longer than 30 days
Please provide your insights and neccesary documentation to start
Thanks,
Sai

HI Prakash,
Thanks for the detailed response, it helped me a lot.
for approval to sales director, operations director and quality director an email has to be triggred simultaneously.We have predefined list depending on plant who can take corrective action and who can approve the corresponding task. Further users should have the option to select who should get the email.
For Approver Determination:
Case 1: In your scenario approver is not fixed.The approvers get selected based on plant. Try to get link between plant and all the approvers. The easy approch will be to maintain the approvers SAP ID in Z-Table against all the plant and developer will use RULE to fetch approvers from this Z-Table. The structure of Z-Table will be:
                                  PLANT     LEVEL   OBJID     USERID
For one plant 3 entry will be maitained here. LEVEL will help to identify the 3 types of approvers i.e. sales director, operations director and quality director. OBJID value will be US (if SAP ID will maintained in USERID), O (if Org. ID will maintained in USERID), S (if Position will maintained in USERID) etc. Benifit of this approch will be when ever you want to change any approver you have to change corresponding entry in this Z-Table no need to do changes in Workflow (As suggested by Ronen).
I used the same logic, creating a Z-Table for agents who has to approve the corrective action for taks completed. I was curious if there is a standard way to get this functionality in SAP. I am not sure about the responsibility rule that Mike was mentioning. Can you tell me which approach is a better design.
Case 2: Now I am confused since you said user can choose next level of approver. So please explain in which scenario Approver will come based on plant and in which scenario user will choose it manually. If user have to choose manually then a screen design is require. From approval screen based on user selection you need to pass the Approver in workflow.
Sorry for not putting things clealy. There are no levels for approval. Each of them are independent i.e. Sales director , Operations Manager and Quality director should get emails for approval after the Plant Manager, QA, Manager, Sales Coordinator take corrective action and the notification is closed only when all 3 of them approve the corrective action.
The user have to choose manually when the correspondng approver of that plant left the company, long vacation, took a new role etc...
Mail Notification: Extended mail notification functionaity is there. The person who will get work item in his/her SAP inbox for approval they will get mail notification in their external mail ID. All the approvers email id should be maintained along with their SAP ID in T-Code SU01. You Just need to provide mail contents in your FS, workflow developer will put same text in in mail body.
I was thinking about the SO23 distribution list for sending the emails to approvers. Also, how do the emails go to the corresonding approvers of that specific plant unless we explicity specify the email id's associated with that plant. Please clarify.
Thanks,
Sandeep

Adding "Filter Criteria" to the XSLT List View Web Part impact on "Export to Excel" functionality within Document Library

Hi there,
XSLT List View displaying all the list items within the Document Library. In order to implement the Search functionality within Document library out of box "Text Filter" web part is configured as explained below. The solution is similar to
the one suggested at
http://www.wonderlaura.com/Lists/Posts/Post.aspx?ID=77
"Text Filter" Web Part added to the page.
Filter Criteria (i.e., XSLT List View columns) added to the XSLT List View where the filter parameters take the input from the "Text Filter" Web Part .
3. Both Web Parts (XSLT List View and the Text Filter) are connected.
When the search criteria is entered into the "Text Filter" Web Part, it is passed to the relevant Columns of the XSLT List View and the documents (List Items) that match the search criteria are shown within XSLT List View.
Search functionality working as expected.
Query: Selecting the "Export to Excel" icon from the ribbon generates the excel spread sheet with no data except Column Titles from the Document library. In the investigation it is
found that adding the 'Filter Criteria' on XSLT List View is causing this bug. When the Filter Criteria is removed, then "Export to Excel" functionality is working as expected.
But it is mandatory to add "Filter Criteria" to implement the search functionality with in the document library.
Help: Help/input appreciated on the work around to get the "Export to Excel" functionality work when the "Filter Criteria"
exist on the XSLT List View.
Regards,

Once again thanks very much for your help Scott. very much appreciated.
In the investigation it is found that removing the 'Filter Criteria' on XSLT List View makes the "Export to Excel" functionality work. But the 'Filter Criteria' is mandatory to get the 'Document Search' functionality.
I think that due to technical limitations it should be concluded that 'only custom development can make all work, no code solutions using the SharePoint Designer can meet all the requirements.
If you can think of any alternative solution that could help in resolving the current issue or fix the issue without any custom implementation please inform. Otherwise this issue would be marked as resolved with your suggested response.
Regards,

PDK pl/sql add_item function and documents table

When we use the add_item function to add an item and upload its content, does the add_item function uploads document content to the document table in the repository?(like the upload_blob() function)
If yes, can I remove the uploaded document from the filesystem after having uploaded it in the documents table?
The PDK API says that there is no supported view for querying the document table. Is there any other way to query the documents in the document table? Or any additional information about how the documents are stored in the document table or how the documents table works?

Duplicate thread ->
PL/SQL add procedure with nested table
Please remove it & marked it as duplicate.
Regards.
Satyaki De.

Existing 2003 forest functional level -- 2012 forest functional level in production environment?

Hello experts!
A quick question if it can be one:
Is it possible to raise a forest functional level from 2003 to 2012 in a production environment (only 2003 DCs with existing roles to only 2012 DCs)? If so, is there a standard implementation of the upgrade process
(migration of roles, migration tools, etc.)?
many thanks!
David

hi,
Thanks for posting.
Sorry i don't know if i am understanding your question. Are you talking about upgrading your DC's in your current forest to 2012 then raising the functional level?
If so, first of all you can only raise the forest and domain functional levels when all DC's in the forest and domain are at 2012 or higher.
To get your domain unto 2012 DC's there are a couple of paths you can adopt, but generally the simplest is:
1. Introduce your first 2012 / 2012 R2 DC into your existing domain, this will extend the schema with the additional attributes that are required to 2012 - this is an automatic process during promotion of your first 2012 DC.
2. Go through and start replacing your existing domain controllers. You don't normally do an inlace upgrade, the preferred method would be to use different hardware, built up the new DC to replace your existing one, then demote the existing one - keep going
through this process until all your DC's are 2012.
NB: which ever DC(s) currently holds the FSMO roles you will need to transfer these to one of your new 2012 DC's before you decommission that one.
if i've got what you were asking wrong, please let me know, otherwise hopefully this helps.
Regards,
Denis Cooper
MCITP EA - MCT
Help keep the forums tidy, if this has helped please mark it as an answer
Blog: http://www.windows-support.co.uk
Twitter: LinkedIn:

The specified forest functional level is invalid. "Lync Server" requires forests running in Windows 2003 mode or higher.

Dear Support Team,
i am having the error ''The specified forest functional level is invalid. "Lync Server" requires forests running in Windows 2003 mode or higher'' from lync 2013 during the schema master prepare on windows server 2008r2 and my forest functional
level are 2008r2.. so can you help me please...?

Dear Support Team,
in my network there are one forest and two domain controller (primary and secondary).. my domain functional
level is windows server 2008r2.. but i am still receiving error.. when i hit the run button for schema prepare its says:
ServerSchemaPrepareTask execution failed on an unrecoverable error.
and when i open log it sasys:
Error: The specified forest functional level is invalid. "Lync Server" requires forests running in Windows 2003 mode or higher.
kindly help me

Functional specification documents..

HI guys,
I am new to SAP HCM..
i was wonderingg as to when is the need to write a Function spec document?
It would be great if you could give an example..
Also, what is the difference between Functioal Spec doc and functioal design document??
Thanks,

Functional-specification documents decribes business requirements and required changes that are to be applied in Project.
For Example If you company want to implement Second saturday as well fouth saturday as off days: For this you have to clearly mentioned the business requirement , what are the pre requisites required , is there ny development is required etc...
some time test cases also attached with this
Please refer these links , which will help you
http://www.premieresapconsultants.com/wisdom/2010/08/sap-functional-document/
http://www.sap-img.com/general/what-are-functional-specification-in-sap.htm

Functional design documents

Hello all,
I would like to know what the functional design document is about. What is the use of functional design document? Pl. post any link or documents related to it.
Thanks,
Maxx

Jenni
Design Documentation tell us how the interfaces are going to work for the entire project. So usually Architects or Senior guys who have indepth experience of XI will usually write this.
Functional Documentation tell us the functioanlity of the interface. This is written by the Functional guys who have indepth knowledge about the functionality what they are looking from the interface. They may even take the help of technical guys to some extent.
Technical Documentation tells us how the interface is going to be worked technically. Here we will mention what are the adapters, naming conventions etc we are going to use for the interface. This is written by the XI developers. This are purely my views and this may change from person to person jenni.
For further info go through the urls:
Re: Building XI
XI technical specification documents
Regards,
---Satish

Functional specification document

I have a requirement where i need to prepare functional specification document, could any one help me out with any fsd template on the same?
format required ( any example document will be an added advantage)

Just google for "sap pi functional document template" and you'll find what you are looking for in the first page itself.
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=3&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0CDIQFjAC&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.piarch…

Hyper-v 2012 R2 Live migration issue in 2003 Domain function Level

hi Team ,
i recently build 2012 R2 Hyper-v Cluster with three node. Everrything working fine with out any issue . Cluster working also fine. Later i came across one issue when tried to Live migration virtual machine from one host to another . it failed all the time
while quick migration is working . i gone through few articles and find it is known issue with hyper-v 2012 R2 where domain functional level is set to 2003 . although they have provided Hotfix but no solution.
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2838043
Please let me know if any one face similar issue and able to resolve by any hotfix. My host are updated .
Thanks
Ravindra
Ravi

Hi Ravi1987,
The KB2838043 is applied for Server 2012 node, Could you offer us the related cluster error event id, or you can refer the following article to check your cluster
network binding order is correct or not.
Configuring Windows Failover Cluster Networks
http://blogs.technet.com/b/askcore/archive/2014/02/20/configuring-windows-failover-cluster-networks.aspx
You can try to install recommended hotfixes and updates for Windows Server 2012 R2-based failover clusters first, then monitor this issue again.
The KB download:
Recommended hotfixes and updates for Windows Server 2012 R2-based failover clusters
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2920151
More information:
Windows Server 2008 R2 Live Migration – “The devil may be in the networking details.”
http://blogs.technet.com/b/askcore/archive/2009/12/10/windows-server-2008-r2-live-migration-the-devil-may-be-in-the-networking-details.aspx
I’m glad to be of help to you!

Domain Functional Level: 2008 R2 to 2012 R2

My current forest and domain functional levels are 2008 R2. I know I can safely upgrade the functional levels in most cases, but I want to specifically know with regards to Lync.
Our entire environment, including Lync, is running on Windows Server 2012 R2. (We have no domain joined clients.)
Can I safely raise the forest and domain functional levels to 2012 R2 without impacting Lync?

you can easily upgrade the funtional level without any issues since you have all the Domain Controllers on Win server 2008R2.
http://support2.microsoft.com/kb/2869728/en-us
For more details : Listed below link has the table which shows the effects of upgrading the domain functional levels to Windows 2012
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/understanding-active-directory-functional-levels
pankaj(MCT)

Active Directory Volume Activation Services Forest Prep on 2003 Functional Level?

Hello,
Please can anyone tell me if I can perform the steps outlined below when I have a mix of 2003 R2 and 2008 R2 domain controllers currently running on 2003 Functional Level.
My aim is to get AD Volume Activation Services running without needing to install a 2012 R2 DC and upgrade all my 2003 R2 DCs (which I have no control of), though I accept the schema update is a requirement for the AD Volume Activation Services aspect, where
as KMS will still work?
(http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/windowsserver/en-US/99e94b1c-fe8a-4224-954b-2126994c9d0f/how-do-i-activate-kms-on-2012-in-a-2008-r2-domain?forum=winserver8setup)
Steps to make this work:
Copy ALL files from <win2012 DVD>\support\adprep folder to a folder on server holding FSMO role for Forest/Domain
Run "adprep.exe /forestPrep"
Run "adprep.exe /domainPrep /forceReplicate"
Join 2012 server that VAS will be installed on to domain
Follow instructions, as needed, in VAS 2012 test lab guide here: http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh831794.aspx
Thanks,
Peter

Hi,
As far as I know this role should be installed on Windows 2012, so without Windows 2012, we cannot do this.
AD DS must be at the schema level of Windows Server 2012 or newer to store activation objects. Domain controllers running earlier versions of Windows Server can activate clients after their schemas have been updated using the Windows Server 2012 version
of Adprep.exe.
Please go through the below links for more details:
Active Directory-Based Activation vs. Key Management Services
https://blogs.technet.com/b/askpfeplat/archive/2013/02/04/active-directory-based-activation-vs-key-management-services.aspx
Volume Activation Overview
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh831612.aspx
Regards,
Yan Li
Regards, Yan Li

AD FS Across Differing Domain Functional Levels

My customer needs to implement AD FS for single sign on due to a cloud based email solution they recently implemented. The problem is, their domain controllers are Server 2003 (non-R2) at a functional level of 2003 mixed mode. They should be able to raise
to 2003 native if necessary however. Their solution is to create a new 2008 domain and implement a two-way trust, running AD FS in the new domain serving the clients in the 2003 domain. This way should be quicker than upgrading their current domain
which would be a rather large project due to their size and complexity.
Are there any gotcha's I should know about with doing it this way? I have verified that we can create the two-way trust between domains of these functional levels, and AD FS can service clients in a trusted domain, but I am not entirely sure if AD
FS will care that the trusted domain is 2003 non-R2. Can anyone confirm if this will be a feasible scenario?
Thanks very much!!
Wraith

Hi
Wraith,
In addition, if you are not using Windows Server 2012 or above as ADFS server, you will be fine with Windows 2003 mixed mode.
“Since ADFS does not require Active Directory functional-level modifications to operate successfully. However, if you are using Windows NT token–based applications and
you want a token to be generated using Kerberos Service-for-User (S4U), the domain functional level must be Windows 2000 native or Windows Server 2003”, quoted form below article:
Appendix A: Reviewing ADFS Requirements
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc778681(v=WS.10).aspx
More information for you:
ADFS and Domain Functional Level
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/windowsserver/en-US/5cc0e898-eae2-46ce-8491-5ccf61380423/adfs-and-domain-functional-level?forum=winserverDS
ADFS requirements
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc727972(v=WS.10).aspx
Best Regards,
Amy

Windows server domain group membership with functional level 2003 - windows API

Hello,
I am a programmer trying to get members of a global domain group using windows server 2008 enterprise edition,
in the past there wasn't a functional level 2003 on windows server, but when 2003 functional level appeared a new features were added like adding
a global group as a member to another global group in the domain,
in the past the API written could get the members if the member was a user, but it can't get a member if it was a global group.
I am using this API "NetGroupGetUsers" to get a members of a global domain group, and it gets the users but it doesn't get the
members if they were global groups...
I tried another API "NetLocalGroupGetMembers" it is getting a global group as a member but it is working only if the owner group was a local group on the server
or on another machine that is added to the server, but this API doesn't work if the owner group was a domain global group.
My question is how to get members of a global group including the members that are global groups too???
Thanks,
- Shomaf

> I am using this API "NetGroupGetUsers" to get a members of a global
This interface is based on Win 2000, and since Win 2000 did not support
global group nesting, this interface does not, too...
> domain group, and it gets the users but it doesn't get the
> members if they were global groups...
You should use
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/aa706032.aspx - and
don't forget to track down the nestings :)
Martin
Mal ein
GUTES Buch über GPOs lesen?
NO THEY ARE NOT EVIL, if you know what you are doing:
Good or bad GPOs?
And if IT bothers me - coke bottle design refreshment :))

MM Function Level Document

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for