MM: Reversing confirmed transfer order

Hi Gurus,
I want to reverse a transfer order which is having handling unit and is confirmed. After confirmation someone deleted Handling unit assignement in outbound delivery.
Now I want to delete transfer order which is confirmed but it's handling unit assignment is deleted by someone from delivery. Can anyone suggest me the solution?
issue 2:
Also some one has created a delivery before usage decision trhough migo and confirmed the transfer order so now I can't issue delivery completely (QI to UR stock) OR I can't reverse handling unit. I get different errors. Can anyone give me a solution?
thanks in anticipation.
RajaRam

A transfer order for a delivery can be reversed with transaction LT0G.

Similar Messages

  • MM-WM: Cancelling confirmed transfer order

    Hi Gurus,
    I have created a delivery with wrong quantity for "purchase order" then I packed material into handling units, completed 'putaway' and finally confirmed the "transfer Orders into warehouse but when I try to post goods receipt it raises an error : PU Ordered quantity exceeded by 20000 Message no. M7022.
    So I can't post it or I can't reverse delivery as it is not posted. Also I don't know how to reverse confirmed transfer order. Can any one explain me how to do it?
    Thanks
    Shiv

    Hi,
    You can cancel the confirm transfer order using LT0G, once you cancel it, you can cancel your delivery, and create a fresh delivery with the right quantity....
    Reward, if helpful.....
    Regards,
    Noopur

  • WM  how to cancel confirmed Transfer Order

    Hi,
    I am new to WM, can you please tell how to cancel confirme Ttransfer order in WM.
    for example if post goods issues is compleated for delivery then the Transfer order will be created and the Trnasfer order confirmed manually, now  how to reverse or cancel the Transfer order.
    please advice
    Regards
    Kumar

    If the goods receipt is created, for example goods receipt for purchase order.After receiving the goods then we will putaway the stock by confirming transfer order.
    If we want to reverse the goods receipt then how to cancel the To.
    Pls advice
    First you should reverse the GR and then (based on settings in IM-WM interface) a new TR will be created and processing that TR (e.g. from trx LB10) you will create a NEW TO (stock removal TO).
    Regards,
    Csaba

  • Unable to confirm transfer order due to error message "enter a storage unit

    Hi guys:
    I am unable to confirm transfer order due to error message popping up and saying "enter a storage unit", and I tried to search it in whole thread in the forum,it was suggestion to pick up destination storage unit via ls24, but I did went to ls24 and trying to click that line(transfer order) but unable to find the storage unit, so is there another way to fix it?

    Hi Allen...
    Pls check if your Storage Type is SU Active. If yes, then system will create a storage unit according to the setting done for the storage unit management, perhaps in your case you are confirmin TO for the putaway.
    Pls confirm and revert
    Regards
    Shiva

  • Confirming transfer order for nested handling units (picking and shipping)

    Hi
    My shipping location is HU + WM, I understand we cannot "auto confirm" Transfer Orders during creation from an outbound delivery (LT03) in the case of nested HUs because the system wants to know which exact box HUs ( The TO only specifies the pallet HU...storage unit)
    I have an automatic Pick HU created during TO confirmation but the system still prompts for me to enter  box HUs that need to be shipped/repacked on LT12. This makes logical sense but is slowing down our shipping process. Since we do not put HU labels on our boxes, the picker has to go into HUMO, enter the pallet HU, retrieve the box HUs and finally enter some of those on the TO confirmation screen to match the open quantity. In reality we don't really care what HUs he picks as long as he picks from the right pallet.
    Is there any way to automate this? If the system can pick box HUs sequentially, randomly or create further pick HUs. Anything but doesnt ask the picker to put in the box HU numbers
    OR
    Is there a way to auto confirm TOs during creation
    OR
    Is there any way to putaway box level HUs into the warehouse at the end of the production line so that Storage Unit is the box HU number and not the pallet HU number, that way it wouldn't prompt me for box HUs during picking.
    I would really appreciate your help.

    This is the standard SAP for picking nested handling units.  You can do some more reading on this by accessing the SAP note 829266.
    We had a similar problem with nested handling units - what we ended up doing was writing a BDC program that would take the nested handling unit and pack it back onto that HU instead of the pick HU after TO confirmation was done in the delivery. 
    In order to get your TO to automatically confirm, check the configuration for the storage type that its picking from - look to see if "Storage Type requires confirmation for removal/placement" is checked. 
    You can als ocheck the movement type configuration for Propose Confirmation.

  • Exit to confirm transfer order with a storage unit number

    hi guys,
    I want to confirm transfer order with a storage unit number  from LT06 transaction, somebody know a user exit? .. actuallly i am using  MWMTO004 (EXIT_SAPLL03A_005)  but it doesn´t confirm the transfer order, How can i solve it? give me suggestions.
    Thanks in advance.
    Marisol.
    Edited by: Marisol on Apr 28, 2010 7:40 PM

    I solved  the problem myself.
    Thanks.

  • Block or warn when delete a delivery that has confirmed transfer order

    Hi,
    Our system allows user to delete a delivery with confirmed transfer order (not for open TO though). This creates lots material in the status of wating PGI. Is there any method to block or at least warn the user from deleting a delivery with confirmed TO?
    Thanks in advance,
    Colin

    Hi Sridhar,
    Thanks for your quick response. I put these codes in the user exit
    FORM userexit_delete_document.
      message 'cannot delete' type 'E'.
      v50agl-no_commit = 'X'.
    ENDFORM.                    "USEREXIT_DELETE_DOCUMENT
    The no_commit would stop delivery being deleted. Since the internal tables and structure have been cleared up/changed before this user exit, when back to VL02N, the line items and some other info disappear. Is there any way I can roll back the data in those internal tables or structures, or simply exit out and back to the selection screen?
    Thanks,
    Colin

  • HU Identification error at the time of confirming Transfer order

    Hi Guys
    While confirming the Transfer order with respect to Outbound delivery
    We are getting this error
    Source storage unit we have provided is as per our naming convention : sea07+701
    But it is giving this error :Enter a storage unit
    HU identification field it is pointiong the cursor
    CAn any body solve and suggest a solution?????????
    Message no. L3216

    Hi,
    You need to enter the destination SU number as well. There is customizing in the storage type as well as the mvt to decide how the destination SU / HU needs to be determined (either copy source or take pick HU as destination HU for example).
    MZ

  • WM - Confirm Transfer Order - and automated Goods Issue posting

    Hi
    We operate Warehouse Management, on the Sales Process that has been implemented, we have standard sales order, delivery with a transfer order created in WM, when the TO for the delivery is confirmed in WM (tcode LT12) this usually automatically creates the goods issue in MM.
    However sometimes the Goods Issue in MM is not created automatically, I can see no immediate reason why, and if the Delivery is brought up in VL02N, and 'Post Goods Issue' option chosen it goes through fine without any probs.
    Any ideas welcome on what I should be checking to track the problem?

    There is no background job that is producing the Post Goods Issue in this instance after the TO is manually confirmed in LT12.   My issue is that usually the PGI happens automatically from the TO being confirmed (not by a background scheduled job), but in some instances it does not. 
    It is the latter problems I am trying to trace, as when the PGI is not automatic from the TO confirmation, we are able to goto VL02N (Change Delivery) and issue a PGI without an error.  The problem is that this is an extra step, I wish to trace why it is not automatic from the TO confirmation like in 98% of cases in our setup. 
    There is defintely no background job scheduling PGI, I am aware of the RVV50L21 program which can be used to schedule background jobs for PGI, as we use this on another Sales Org (where WM is not used), but it is not scheduled for the Plants/Shipping Points regarding my TO/auto PGI issue.

  • Confirm Transfer order using FM L_TO_CONFIRM

    Dear All,
    I need to confirm a transfer order.
    I am using this FM 'L_TO_CONFIRM' to do that, but i think there is some issue in populating the tables parameter (T_LTAP_CONF & T_LTAP_CONF_HU) of this FM, so i am not getting the sy-subrc to 0.
    Can anyone who used the above fm, please post the code - from fetching values from tables to populating the parameters of this FM.
    This would be really helpful.
    Thanks,
    Hima

    Is WS_LM_TRANSFER_ORDER_CREATE a better option for my desired results?

  • Problems Confirming Transfer Order

    Hi,
    While creating a transfer order we have given same sorce and destination bin and TO was saved, while we are trying to confirm getting error message "negative pick/putaway not allowed contact sap".
    We dont allow this so this is obvious but anyhow we have to confirm it, is it possible by any means? Only one SU is been associated with it.  Can we manually update the confirmation checkbox at table LTAP will it be useful or trying to confirm it using L_to_Confirm function module? Or implementing sap note will be helpful?
    What could be best possible solution to overcome this problem?  Would appreciate your support.
    Thanks,
    Rahul

    Hi Rahul,
    Please check the below SAP notes whether applicable to
    resolve your current problem
    896528
    1124050
    1423066
    Regards
    R. Senthil Mareeswaran.

  • Picked serial number pop-up window when confirming transfer order

    Hi :
    I used to be able to see picked serial number pop-up window when I was confirming the transfer order via lt12, but now it doesn't come after system refresh, is there any setting to trigger it?

    Hi Allen
    Can you tell me how you were able to close this issue. Thank you.

  • Confirm Transfer Order - Assign Handling unit

    Hi All,
    When I try to confirm a Transfer Order system by default assigns a Pallet (packaging material - pallet) handling unit.
    Is there a way I can assign a Master Carton handling unit (packaging material - MC)?
    Am I missing any customizing entries?
    Please help.
    Thanks,
    Meghna

    Hi,
    the customizing for the creation of the Pick-HU:
    IMG: Logistics Execution -> Warehouse Management -> Interfaces -> Shipping -> Define Shipping Control.
    Define Control for Automatic Creation of Pick HUs. Check the entries for you whse/source/destination/movmnt type.
    I suppose at least that is what you mean with "by default assigns a Pallet (packaging material - pallet) handling unit". Or anything else?
    Best regards
    Juergen
    Edited by: Juergen Pitz on Feb 17, 2010 8:38 AM

  • WM: Change source bin confirm transfer order

    Hi guys,
    Do you know if I can change source bin when confirming the transfer order.
    I know I can customize the system if I want to change destination bin when confirming the transfer order.
    Thanks,
    Fatih.

    Hi,
    Hope you cannot change the source bin but as per the configuration in the picking strategy in the customizing you can define the picking sequence for the souce bins.
    example: like check bin " A" if ......(condition)...then pick from bin " B " or pick from bin " C".
    Regards,
    Ravindran

  • Creating/confirming transfer order (WM) using bapi/function modules

    Hi,
    I usually use BDC to create transfer orders or other documents in WM, but i've been told that using BAPI is more correct. I'm new to this concept, so could you please tell me how i can find the apropriate BAPI/function modules available for this purpose in 46C ?
    I thank you in advance,
    Bruno

    Hi Gisk,
    i am trying ot create a TO based on a material document and year. Same function as transaction LB12. Do you know which function module i can use for this.
    I am trying to use the function module L_TO_CREATE_SINGLE, i fill in the T_LTAK-MBLNR and T_LTAK-MJAHR. But do not know which fields to fill in.
    Hope you can help me.
    Grtz
    Coeno

Maybe you are looking for

  • ICal is not a product that lives to Apple's standard

    Hello, I am an Apple fan and have been so since 1984. I define my self as a difficult user to satisfy an happily most of Apple's products satisfies me very much. iCal's is a rare exception that I find limited and short of featuresand. I find that thi

  • IMAC not transferring outside email

    After initial Mail setup on OS X Server, intranet email working. Outside mail will not transfer through IMAC. IMAC log empty. postconf -n: command_directory = /usr/sbin config_directory = /etc/postfix daemon_directory = /usr/libexec/postfix debugpeer

  • Lr vs CS3 color difference rendering on-screen

    I edited an image in Lr1.1 and saved the metadata to file. When I view the same image in PS CS3/ACR there is a color difference. Skin tones are different. [Note: I have ProPhoto as the default CS3 RGB color space]. But wait... there's more. Now when

  • ISight Built-in camera on MacBook stopped working

    Hello, It seems that my iSight camera stopped working after the system update two days ago. I checked several solutions (like reset of SMC, creating other test account...) however this does not solve the issue. I also checked the system profiler and

  • Extending SNP Time series

    Hi, To extend the time series is it mandatory to de-initialize the planning area and then extend the time series ? We are not going to add new KF's then why we have to De-initialize the planning area ? What happens if the timee series is extended wit