MMR -density

Hi experts,
Could some one tell me Is there any field to maintain the Density of a material in MMR
Thanks in advance

Hi,
there is no field as density available in MMR,
You can make use of any free text field and input this density value of urs.
In case if you want to print this on the PO then you can call this field name in the form programming to print it out.
if you want it specific as density then you have to go in for development
Thanks & Regards,
Kiran

Similar Messages

  • Laserjet CP1025nw color, unable to change Print density

    Hi,
    I need to raise the "Print Density" to 5 (for pcb toner transfer) on my Laserjet
    CP1025nw color, but when I open the printer properties I do not have that option
    in the device settings tab, despite what is said on the help page of that model.
    OS: Windows XP
    The printer is on the USB port.
    The pilot is: HP LaserJet Professional CP1020 Series + last update
    How can I change that setting ?
    Please help !!!
    Thank you in advance for any help you can bring !
    All the best,
    This question was solved.
    View Solution.

    From what you describe you want to increase your toner density on your subsequent print jobs. First of all, if you have not, you should uninstall this printer and make sure that the drivers are the most up to date using the website I will link below :
    http://h10025.www1.hp.com/ewfrf/wc/softwareCategory?cc=us&lc=en&dlc=en&product=4052972
    Here you should also check for your firmware to be sure that it is up to date. 
    I would also, both before and after, check under "Printer Preferences" (not properties) and see if there is a way to change the density under the Paper/Quality tab. 
    Let me know if this helps you out! 
    -Spencer 

  • What are the views/fields that we can't change by Mass maintenance of MMR(material master record)?

    Hello friends,
              I would like to know the fields/views that we can not change by using mass maintenance of MMR if there are open PO for that particular material in concern. Likewise there was a question in SAP certification exam having options: "base unit of measure", "material type" and so on....

    in general you can change any field that can be changed in MM02. if the field is grayed then you cannot. e.g. if you make use a MRP profile. and in this profile the maintenance of those fields is disabled then you cannot do it MM17 either.

  • Determining spectral density of poisson process (carson theorem)

    Has anyone ever determined code for working out the spectral density (or
    equivalent) of a Poisson process, based on Carson theorem (or a variant
    thereof)? It doesn't have to be in Labview, but that would be the easiest (or VB).Message Edited by Jo on 05-01-2005 11:34 PM

  • Memory density clarification!!!

    I started another thread on this, but the update to that thread is big enough to have its own thread. However, for the history the link to that thread is https://forum-en.msi.com/index.php?topic=127102. In a nutshell in that thread I wanted to know if I could mix memory modules of different densities on my X58 Platinum SLI. I had previously mixed densities on my Asus P4 build, so why not with my MSI I7 build? Unlike Microsoft I knew Intel would not go backwards with capability. However, the moderators on this site, my X58 Platinum SLI user’s manual, self described gurus on this site, and even MSI tech support with 2 different support tickets all told me I could not mix memory modules of different densities! But I carried on thinking that they were all wrong. As you can see by the supporting picture evidence they are all WRONG and my thinking is right. You CAN mix memory modules of different densities. Not only can you mix them, but it works well enough to overclock. I currently have 2GB memory modules in slots A0-C0 and 1GB memory modules in slots A1-C1. As you can see the BIOS as well as Vista both report the correct 9GB. If you do the math there is only one way to get 9GB and that’s to mix memory module densities.
     Moderators: don’t be so quick to tote the MSI line if you have not seen it with your own eyes!
    End users: if you suspect something is wrong in your manual it probably is. Most mobo manufacturers copy instructions from one mobo model to another and frequently put out false information. As we can see MSI is no exception since they published the following lines:
      - DDR3 memory modules are not interchangeable with DDR2 and the DDR3
        standard is not backwards compatible. You should always install DDR3
        memory modules in the DDR3 DIMM slots.
      - In Three/ Dual-Channel mode, make sure that you install memory modules of
        the same type and density in different channel DIMM slots.
    Anyway . . … I wanted you all to know that you don’t have to throw away memory modules if they are not the same density. If everything about the memory modules are the same except for the density the SPD capabilities of your mobo will sort the rest out!
    There were some pictures here, but sorry I had to stop hosting them at 3:42p, 21 May. Just a bandwidth limitation, that's all. Yeah, I know about photobuket and the like.

    I am not really sure if you are seeing the full picture here.  The fact that you had no problems when mixing different memory modules on two different platforms does not prove anything.  Statistically, it is not significant enough to come up with a general statement like "the manual is wrong" or "yes, you can mix, no problem".  That is simply not
    very responsible as part of general advice.
    Nobody here will tell you that unidentical memory modules will ultimately cause problems on every system.  It can work just fine (just like in your cases), however, most of us have had to do with many systems in the last couple of years and we have come across users with many different system configurations here and in other forums.  There are numerous cases in which mixing memory unidentical memory modules led to unstable or unbootable systems.  There are also numerous cases that were issue free.  Even if the success rate is/was (let us say) 66%, are you really serious in trying to tell us to ignore a 33% failure rate just because you did not run into any problems on two systems?
    I have mixed my Kingston HyperX KHX8500D2K2/2G sticks with a kit of G.Skill-Kit F2-6400PHU2-2GBHZ memory modules on some of the systems I had here in the last couple of month.  And yes, there were cases in which that worked just fine.  However, it caused horrible stability problems on some of the configurations I tested and these issues could be simply resolved by using identical modules. A friend of mine recently bought a second pair of OCZ DDR2-800 modules (same model he already had) and ran into sincere bluescreens and system crashes.  He talked to OCZ and after they made him compare the production dates of the modules, it came out that the newer kit used different memory chips.  OCZ exchanged the old kit for another kit of the same revision as the newer one.  Why:  Because they are very well aware of the fact that stability problems are not unusual  in such cases.
    I am honestly wondering what you are actually trying to prove with this thread.  If your system is stable with your memory mix, that is wonderful for you.  No doubt about that.  But, again, just because you had success regarding your specific configuration, this does not mean that this will be true for all system configurations.  This kind of Inductive reasoning is rather misleading. 
    You are claiming the manual is wrong.  Well, it isn't.  If MSI removes the remark "In Three/Dual-Channel mode, make sure that you install memory modules of the same type and density in different channel DIMM slots." from the manual, what are you going to tell users that actually have problems that disappear once identical memory modules are installed?  They will say:  Why isn't there a note in the manual that advises system builders to use identical modules? 
    Dual and Triple Channel operation is all about synchronous read & write access to the system memory to enhance system performance.  How synchronic can read/write access be on systems with an asynchronic memory configuration? 
    One more thing:  I have read through your other thread again and as far as I see it, you are not referring to the density of the memory modules, but to the capacity/size of the modules (1 GigaByte vs. 2 GigaByte).  Memory Density and Memory Capacity/Size are not the same things:
    The term "memory density" refers to the kind and organization of the memory chips that are used on a memory module.  Corsair's Datasheets do not specify the memory density.  But let's have a look at a Kingston Datasheet for Comparison:
    http://www.valueram.com/datasheets/KVR1333D3N9K3_3G.pdf [3 x 1 Gigabyte]
    This quote from the datasheet refers to the Memory Density:
    Quote
    eight 128M x 8-bit
    "128M x 8-bit" means a memory density of 1024 M-bit (or 1 GBit (note: not MByte/GByte)).
    Now look at this kit:
    http://www.valueram.com/datasheets/KVR1333D3N9K3_6G.pdf [3 x 2 Gigabyte]
    The memory capacity/size of the module has doubled, yet the density is the same:
    Quote
    sixteen 128M x 8-bit
    Again: 128M x 8-bit is 1024M-bit (or 1G-bit).
    The memory size/capacity depends on the number of 128M x 8-bit Chips that are used on the module: 16 x 1024 Mbit = 16384 Mbit.  If you devide that number by 8 (bit -> byte) you get your 2GByte. Although the memory capacity differs (1GB vs 2GB), the memory density is identical (1 Gbit in both cases).
    One more example for comparison:
    Instead of 128M x 8-bit, the density can also be 64M x 8bit for a give 1024MByte Module. 
    Example:
    http://www.valueram.com/datasheets/KVR1066D3N7_1G.pdf [1 GByte]:
    Quote
    based on sixteen 64M x 8-bit DDR3-1066 FBGA components.
    Density is:  64M x 8-bit = 512 MBit x 16
    If 512MBit modules are combined with 1024MBit modules (different density), the chance that the system will not boot at all or be horribly unstable is very high. 
    Quote
    Yes, the manual is wrong.
    No, it is not.   It states the adequate compatibility conditions for synchronous/interleaved multi-channel operation.
    Quote
    there are no specific DDR3 slots.
    There are six slots on your board that are specifically for DDR3.
    Quote
    DDR3 memory modules are not interchangeable with DDR2 and the DDR3
        standard is not backwards compatible. You should always install DDR3
        memory modules in the DDR3 DIMM slots.
    This is actually a very important piece of advice.  For experienced users it may fall into the same category as "Attention! Hot Beverage" on coffee-to-go cups and the "don't use the microwave oven to dry (living) pets" in some microwave user manuals.  In the last two years I have met at least five users that wondered why the board won't boot after forcing DDR memory modules into DDR2 slots or DDR2 memory sticks into DDR3 slots.

  • Conditions in Purchase Order - No scroll bar/Sales Tax value not in mmr

    Hello,
    I am stuck in a weird problem where I have created a Condition Calculation Schema, assigned it to Schema group and assigned that schema to vendor, but when i open my condition in the PO, it does not give me scroll bar i.e. I have calculation Schema with around 10+ conditions, but when I try to put all the conditions in PO at one time, the scroll bar doesnot come up and without it, I cannot view all my conditions in the PO. Its saving the conditions though as seen in report, but cannot display it in PO without the scroll bar. Any ideas?
    Another assignment is that sales tax value and % should not increase the mmr value at time of GR, but when I do GR its adding the sales tax value to mmr value, my requirement is just Gross price be added to mmr, not sales tax value/%. I tried the Statistical checks in Calculation Schema, but to no vail, at GR the sales tax value is being added to the mmr record. Any ideas?
    Lots of points awarded for answer/answers.
    Any clue will help
    Thank you/Afshad
    Edited by: Afshad Irani on Jan 14, 2009 10:27 AM
    Edited by: Afshad Irani on Jan 14, 2009 2:32 PM
    Edited by: Afshad Irani on Jan 15, 2009 6:19 AM

    Q Another assignment is that sales tax value and % should not increase the mmr value at time of GR.
    Ans:
    Dear Afshad,
    Reference to your question, you need to do few settings in your Condition Type and Pricing Schema, if you need Sales Tax value & % not to include in your Material value.
    1 - In SPRO, Check that in your condition type, Control data 2 tab, Accruals check box should not be selected.
    2 - In your Calculation Schema, against your condition types for Sales Tax % and Sales Tax Value, select the check box for Manual & Statistics.
    3 - Also in your Calculation Schema, you should not select any account key in AccKey (Account Key) and in Accruals colomns.
    If any one of these setting is not defined, the valuation price for your material will be increased due to the fact that your settings for Condition type and Calculation Schema is allowing the same to hit the value of your material directly.
    Hope it works for you.
    Regards
    Jibran

  • Whats the difference between high-density and low-density ram?

    I bought what I thought was supposed to be a cheap 256 mb chip (pc100 or 133) but the g4 400 read only 128mb, The fellow in the store that sold it flipped out when I told him I had a Mac and said something about high density and low-density.Another guy in the store described it as being one sided and two sided.
    I don't know what my machine needs. I got my money back but he would'nt let me exchange the chip for another, me thinking it was simply mislabeled.

    The QuickSilvers use PC-133 SDRAM and are compatible with high-density memory chips (256 Megabit), so that 16-chip 512 MB and 8-chip 256 MB non-ECC DIMMs are supported. A low density, 16-chip (128 Megabit) 256 MB DIMM is also supported.

  • Problem in entering stock as well as closing posting period for MMRs

    Dear All,
    Whenever I do goods receipt (tcode: MB1C, movement type: 561)  and enter, it gives the error "Posting only possible in 2007/05 and 2007/04 in CoCd XXXX. I know I need to close posting periods for MMRs. But the while doing that using MMPV for 2007/06 and CoCd XXXX, it comes to a screen stating following:
    <b>Client YYY
    Period entered (month/year) :06 2007
    Incorrect period in control rec of CoCd XXXX; no conversion The current period of record (month/year) is 05 2007</b>
    Alternatively, I try to close period thru OMSY and change period on "Pe" column, a window pops up saying "The CoCd XXXX no longer be initialised"
    Can anyone help on this? I'm stuck and can't go further. Reward points assured.

    Hi
    It is very clear from the meassage that the current period is 05/2007.
    You have to close this.In the screen you have to enter 05 2007.Then it will close 5 th period and opens 6th period.then close 6th period so that it open the current period 7 (If the fisical year variant is calander year).
    Regards
    Ramakrishna

  • HP 1300 Laserjet & HP 2605dn Laser Jet printers print density problem

    I have both an HP 1300 b/w and HP 2605dn color laser printer.  In the last week both printers have changed the output density. The 1300 print is coming out lighter than it used to, and the 2605 is not print the color tones as it used to. What used to be orange is now only yellow.Other colors are not right either. I can compare them to output a few weeks earlier, and they are much lighter and different color tones.
    Both printers have plenty of toner in all cartridges. The toner cartridge on the 1300 was changed 2 weeks ago. The toner on the 2605 is 3/4 full.
    This was like something got into the printer drivers and reset some parameters on both printers at once.
    Can anyone help me here to check this out and how to correct the problem?

    I have the same problem with my laser printer 2605dn.  the color is pale, i replaced the cartridges with original hp's but it did not help.  I also lost the capability of double side printing that I had when I originally loaded the printer drivers.  I noticed this all after I checked the internet for software updates for my printer.  Are there any solutions for these problems?
    please let me know.

  • Adjust density on HP Laserjet P2015dn printer

    Hello,
    I use HP Laserjet P2015dn printer with Windows 7 Ultimate. I would like to ask you how to adjust the density of printing. I couldn't find any similar option in the printer's properties.
    Thanks.

    Stasko,
    I am sorry, but to get your issue more exposure I would suggest posting it in the commercial forums since this is a commercial printer. You can do this at http://h30499.www3.hp.com/hpeb/ .
    I hope this helps.
    ↙-----------How do I give Kudos?| How do I mark a post as Solved? ----------------↓

  • ASK THE EXPERTS : High Density Wireless Deployments and CleanAir Technology

    with
    Welcome to the Cisco Support Community Ask the Expert conversation. This is an opportunity to get an update on High Density Wireless Deployments and CleanAir technology with Cisco expert Fred Niehaus. Fred is a technical marketing engineer for the Wireless Networking Business Unit at Cisco, where he is responsible for developing and marketing enterprise wireless solutions using Cisco wireless LAN products. In addition to his participation in major deployments, Fred has served as technical editor for several Cisco Press books including the "Cisco 802.11 Wireless Networking Reference Guide" and "The Business Case for Enterprise-Class Wireless LANs." Prior to joining Cisco with the acquisition of Aironet, Fred was a support engineer for Telxon Corporation, supporting some of the very first wireless implementations for major corporate customers. Fred has been in the data communications and networking industry for more than 20 years and holds a Radio Amateur (Ham) License "N8CPI."
    Remember to use the rating system to let Fred know if you have received an adequate response.
    Fred might not be able to answer each question due to the volume expected during this event. Remember that you can continue the conversation on the shortly after the event. This event lasts through June 3, 2011. Visit this forum often to view responses to your questions and the questions of other community members.

    You are correct, between the higher numbers of users with multiple devices the bandwidth requirements keep increasing.
    The limitation of three non-overlapping channels in the 2.4 GHz space is driving more customers to 5 GHz, it is important to have both bands when high density deployments are needed.  While many older devices only support 2.4 GHz, we are now seeing far more devices with 5 GHz as well.
    The recomendation of 20-25 clients and 8 voice calls on a given 2.4 GHz channel is still a good "rule of thumb" with actual customer data requirements driving those numbers higher or lower. You are right when you say "throwing Access Points" at the problem can degrade the wireless quality as co-channel interference and overall noise floor can rise with multiple Access Points that can all hear each other.
    A better approach to the problem is to throw more spectrum at this issue (using 5 GHz channels) and elements of 802.11n (20 MHz) bandwidth on 2.4 GHz.
    What we have been doing in high density deployments is to try to minimize the propagation of a cell and focus it in a given direction.  This can be done by
    1. Managing the RF power of the radios (Access Points) and in some cases the client's power (using elements of CCX).
    2. Using the right antennas to shape both Tx and Rx cell size to help isolate, we have recently introduced a new high gain antenna for stadiums that does this well.
    3. Limit supported rates, obviously the higher the data rate the less sensitive the receiver is and the smaller the cell size becomes.
    4. Enable 5 GHz (that adds far more channels for data throughput)
    5. Limit the number of SSIDs in use as each requires a separate beacon (adding to RF utilization)
    6. Co-locating access points with non-overlapping channels
    There are some challenges, for example; many dual -band clients prefer to connect to 2.4 GHz, and 2.4 GHz is more likely to be busier and subject to interference, so we also enable Cisco "Band-Select" which basically "nudges" those clients off 2.4 GHz and pushes them to 5 GHz so as to free up the 2.4 GHz band when we can determine the client has 5 GHz capability.
    So how is this done? well, we do this by listening to the clients and if we detect that the client is sending out probe requests on both bands we know the client can use 5 GHz so we essentially make the 5 GHz band "appear more attractive" to that client.
    Note: Client load balancing and Band select are features in the Cisco Unified controller menu.
    Also enabling client link (intelligent beam forming) helps direct the signal directly at the client and reduces same channel interference.

  • External displays with similar pixel density to 17" MBP display?

    I've got a 17" MacBook Pro, native resolution 1920x1200, which is quite high in terms of pixel density. I have a 24" external Samsung display, also 1920x1200, which means the pixel density is lower. It works fine, but (as you might expect), screen items increase in size rather noticeably when I drag from the laptop display to the external display. (The 24" LCD Apple Cinema Display is also 1920x1200, so the same thing would happen). I've been looking all over the place, and I can't seem to find an external display in the 20-24" range that has a resolution higher than 1920x1200. Ideally I'd like to find a display with the same amazing pixel density, so everything is the same size on both my laptop display and on the external display. I don't know what that would be--probably something like 2048x1152 on a 20" or 22", and 2560x1600 for a 24". Even Apple's 30" Cinema Display at 2560x1600 (or what I imagine will be the new 27" LCD coming out later this summer, probably at 2560x1600) would suffer from this problem, because while the resolution is great, the screen size is so large that the pixel density is lower and once again screen items would increase in size when moved from the laptop monitor to the external monitor. I don't really care about screen size or cost. I'd buy a 20" display, or a 30" display, at pretty much any price, if the pixel density were identical to my MacBook Pro. Anybody know where I can find something like this?

    The pixel densities of the 15" hi-res MBP at 1680 x 1050 and the 17" at 1920 x 1200 are really quite extreme — the 17" slightly more so than the 15". To read the "fine print" on those screens without a resolution-independent user interface (which the Mac OS doesn't yet offer), most users have to sit closer to those displays than they'd want to be to a 27" or 30" display, simply because for a viewer sitting that close to it, the bigger display would extend outward beyond the central field of sharply focused vision. One would constantly be leaning forward and back: in to read the menus or palettes and then out to see the whole screen. That would be pretty tiring. Thus I think it's quite unlikely that we'll ever see 30", 27" or maybe even 24" displays from Apple or anyone else at the same pixel density as the highest-resolution MBPs: 133.2 pixels per inch for the 17" and 128.6 for the 15", compared with 108.8 for the 27" iMac and 97.7 for the 30" Cinema Display). The current standard-resolution 15" MBP at 110.3 actually has a lower pixel density than the 13", at 113.5.
    Interestingly, the current 24" Apple LED-backlit display at 113.2 has almost exactly the same pixel density as the 13" MacBook Pro screen. For someone who wanted things to stay the same size when moving from screen to screen, that would be an ideal pairing. But the 13" MBP sure wouldn't be any match for the 17" in terms of screen real estate when each was being used as a stand-alone portable.

  • MMR Purchase Order Text

    Hello Guys,
    I am buidling a report in SQ01 to bring information abaout my MMR using table MARA some extra table.
    The situation is that in my MMR I have extra description for the equipment on the Purchase Order Text view which I could not find a way to bring in my Query.
    Does anyone no a way to report what we input in the MMR on Purchase Order Text view? That would be very helpfull.
    Thanks
    Carlos Araes

    Hello Guys,
    I am not sure if I was clear in my explanation. When I am creating the MMR I am adding on the MMR view Purchase Order text some extra description for the MMR which when I use it populates the PO the fields on table table EKKO or EKPO.
    The difference here it is that I am looking to bring this information from table MARA. The extra descritpion I input on MMR view Purchase Order text is not available in table MARA as well as EKKO or EKPO any way.
    From table STXH I could not identify where the input would be allocate could you give a bit more details regarding this table?
    thanks
    ARAES

  • Photoshop Save As PDF Settings Text loses 100% Black or Color Density is too High

    I am taking a CMYK Photoshop file and saving it as a PDF for a magazine.
    By request, the company has asked that the color density does not exceed 260%.  In the output setings of the Save Adobe PDF dialog box, under color, I have:
    Color Conversion:  Convert to Destination
    Destination: U.S. Web Uncoated v2 (told to me by the magazine to use)
    Profile Inclusion Policy:  Include Destination Profile
    When I create the PDF, SUCCESS!!! it works where the color density is under 260%.
    I verified in Acrobat Pro X by going to View / Tools / Print Production / Output Preview with the following settings:
    Simulation Profile:  U.S. Web Uncoated v2
    Sample Size:  3x3
    Total Area Coverage checked and set to 260%
    HOWEVER, when I do this, the text goes from CMYK 0 0 0 100 to using all four colors.  I have been recommended by the company to keep pure back on the text due to possible registration errors.
    If I export out to PDF using the "PDF/X-1a" (inside photoshop pdf export), then I can get the text to keep 0 0 0 100 but the color density goes way over 260%.
    Has anyone had this problem?   I cannot get the color density to stay under 260% AND keep the text to 100% black.
    Any help is always greatly appreciated.

    Thank you Mylenium for your reply.  What you have said makes sense but I am not sure how to implement it.  I did a google search on Photoshop Multichannel mode and I did really find anything helpful or relevant.
    I tried playing with the multichannel just the same.  I made a copy of my photoshop document first (just in case I screwed up my file) and I converted it to multichannel mode from the current CMYK.  (Image / Mode / Multichannel)  Under "Channels" I looked at each layer (Cyan, Magenta, Yellow, and Black) individually and the text and other black areas in question were only on the black channel as it should be.  Now that I am in multichannel mode, I cannot "Save As" a Photoshop PDF file so I had to do a Print to PDF option.  I used the same export setting (or as close that I could tell) that I was using before and I still ended up with the same problem.  My color density is under 260% but my black text is using 4 channels.
    I also noticed that when I converted to Multichannel mode, the color of the image did change / shift a bit which also has me a bit worried.
    Can you describe how I am to implement Multichannel mode to get my desired output?  Also, can you elaborate on "custom channel for text blacks"?
    I appreciate the help, thank you!

  • Setting Total Area Coverage (TAC or Density) in InDesign

    Is there a way to set the Total Area Coverage (TAC or Density) in the Export options from InDesign?
    I feel that the color management tools relate to elements created within InDesign and not placed images.
    My printer requires a PDF/X-1a:2001 compliant PDF with a TAC of 240% maximum.
    Is this possible using from within InDesign, or do I have to address 'Placed' images within Photoshop or Illustrator?
    Thank you for your response, in advance.

    InDesign's colour management can be set to affect placed content as well as native content.
    Do you have (or can your printer provide, or suggest) a CMYK profile that has 240% TAC?

Maybe you are looking for