Mobile wireless solutions

Hi all.
Is this a place for questions about mobile wireless solutions like cdma pdsn, home agent, etc?
I'm particularly interested in differences between 12.3 and 12.4 branches of cdma pdsn software.

Hope the following link will give details
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk722/tk721/tk488/tsd_technology_support_sub-protocol_home.html

Similar Messages

Enterprise wide wireless solution

Hi All
I got task to design enterprise wide wireless solution for my client. There are 50+ offices from 20-600 users. Offices are mostly connected as a hub and spoke by MPLS or VPN IPsec. Most of the office will have one or more WLC but some will have AP (H-REAP) only. User should be able to roam everywhere. Certificate must be deployed (EAP-TLS) on client and server. I’m not sure how to deploy Radius. Just primary and secondary centrally located or somehow distributed. Any suggestion re this whole scenario will be appreciated
Thank you

I agree with Stephen/Steve's post. Get someone to do the design, pre-installation survey, implementation and post-implementation survey. There are alot of things that can go wrong and there are misconceptions that need to be ironed out. For example:
There are 50+ offices from 20-600 users.
Ok. There's no biggie with the statement above. But it will not "gell" with the statement below:
User should be able to roam everywhere.
Alot of executives believe (incorrectly) that WLAN roaming and mobile/cell phone roaming are synonymous. This perception needs to be taken with caution.
You have 50+ offices. Ok, I get this. Now unless you are going to tell me that the "open space" between each offices will be covered with your WLAN then there's no such thing as "roaming". You will get the feeling of "roaming" when you are, for example, in an office with wall-to-wall wireless and you walk from one end of the building to the opposite end and you are still continuously on the wireless. This is possible because your client was able to continuously connect to the same WLAN and the WLAN handed your client from one WAP to another.

What wireless solutions does the video pod support?

For a future webcast, I have a need to shoot a demonstration of chest x-ray equipment, suturing methods, and other "allied health" related procedures. A simple webcam is not enough. I have been looking at wireless camera technologies, and there are myriads (e.g., JVC's line of wifi camcorders). But what type of wireless solution does Adobe Connect (version 9) support for the video pod? Or what type of workaround? And how? I need to find specifications in order to purchase the right products to do the job.
I so appreciate your help in finding the right solution.
Glen Gummess,
Instructional Designer
University of St. Francis
Joliet, IL

No, that was the question I wanted to ask. I've been hoping that some(one, how, where) would know of a solution that I envision as a portable webcam that sends video, wirelessly, to a type of base station that would connect to a computer with a USB hub. Alas, there may not be such a species but I can hope. Logitech came close with the Mac and iOS supported "Broadcaster".
You're probably right about using the Connect mobile app and a smart phone, and I have been pondering the same solution. But this would involve equipment my university does not control, and students whom I would, in all candor, not want to rely upon. But before I close this with yours as the correct answer I'm hoping that someone out there may have the "epiphany" I'm looking for.
Thanks, though; I value your opinion.
Glen

Support mobile wireless handsets on UC320, such as Cisco 7921/5?

The UC320 is great, a major improvement over the UC 520. Can you talk about any plans to support mobile wireless handsets like the Cisco 7921 or 7925 on the UC320 so employees can be reached via local WiFi while walking around.
Also will the UC320 someday support a WiFi connection to the AP541N Wireless LAN Access Point? Thanks.

The indecision Paul talks about in respect of the UC320W is in sharp relief to the Cisco OnPlus Agent and Service where there is community consultation on roadmap development and rapid delivery of these features. I can only think Matthew is right and that Cisco thinks the features requested for the UC320W will bastardise their UC540/560 market. At the lower end of that market they are probably right. However, in my country a recent government report stated that 97 percent of all business enterprises employee less 19 people or less. These enterpises employ around 80 percent of the working population. By nature of their size these businesses simply cannot afford the UC500 range of products. It is a huge market for a product of the UC320W's ilk but these business will not be fobbed off with a product like the current UC320W with a very limited range of features.
Right now the indecision in how this product is to develop means we do not sell it, albeit we believe it has great potential. However, we can't sell potential without a defined and commited roadmap and commitment from Cisco to the product. If not that, then please put us all out of our misery and EOL the UC320W.
Does the recently released SPA302D DECT handset have potential to be a DECT solution for the UC320W?
Regards
Stephen

Mobile Wireless Webserver

Why a mobile wireless webserver??
These days, nobody gives a second thought when they make a phone call to enquire information, chat casually or communicate. The called party is reached directly by a mobile or fixed phone. This was the age of voice communications, but as the future is data & voice integration, a personal (maybe business) mobile wireless webserver may be the next form mobile phones will take.
http://www.quiezent.com/pda_wws.html

Hi,
The Officejet 6500 Wireless E709n does not support the ePrint feautre, therefore the printer does not have any dedicated ePrint address, as you may find listed below:
http://h10025.www1.hp.com/ewfrf/wc/document?docname=c02814760&cc=us&dlc=en&lc=en&product=391194&tmp_...
You may print from the Windows 7 PC using the standard software,
From the iPad you may print the HP ePrint Home & Biz app:
http://h10025.www1.hp.com/ewfrf/wc/document?docname=c02775166&cc=us&dlc=en&lc=en&product=391194&tmp_...
For the Nokie Lumia 800, I afraid HP does not provide any solution for Windows 7.5 mobile OS.
The only solution provided for Windows Mobile is the HP iPrint Photo app which only support Windwos mobile 6.5 and below.
I would suggest you to check the Ovi Store for any available 3rd party printing solutions.
Regards,
Shlomi
Say thanks by clicking the Kudos thumb up in the post.
If my post resolve your problem please mark it as an Accepted Solution

I have recently bought a Seagate Goflex satellite mobile wireless hard drive. I have converted some of my AVI movies to mp4 and transferred them to the hard drive, but when I play them through my iPad 2 I can hear the sound but not see the movie. Help???

I have recently bought a Seagate Goflex satellite mobile wireless hardrive , i have converted some of my AVI movies to MP4 and loaded them onto the hard drive, when I try and play them through my I pad2 I can hear the sound of the movie but not see the film, somebody please help, what am I doing wrong as I have spent a lot of time converting these movies to be able to travel with my iPad and watch them. Thank you

Unfortunately, the drive is pretty much restricted without hacking it. That is, you can't stream its content via standardized protocols like UPnP, SMB, FTP and the like. This makes you won't be able to access its content from any third-party apps otherwise capable of playing back AVI files from UPnP / SMB / FTP / WebDAV etc. sources.
While this is certainly not a recommendation (I can in no way be held responsible if anything goes wrong): you may want to consider extending the capabilities of the drive by installing the hack: http://www.hackseagatesatellite.com/wordpress/welcome/
It'll "open" the drive for third-party, AVI-capable multimedia apps like GoodPlayer, It's Playing etc. to directly play the files over the network.

What Mobile Sales solution for ERP 6.0 ?

Hi colleagues,
I have serious difficulty to understand what is the SAP offering for Mobile Sales solutions for SPA ERP 6.0. SAP is vague and just say there IS solution for R/3 (?).
My questions are in two directions:
1. About the "preconfigured" Mobile Sales offerings or xApps or whatever it is:
    - can we use SAP MSR 2.0 with ERP 6? If yes- are still the limitations described in Note OSS 735727 valid (use only with Microsoft PocketPC2003, PocketPC2003 SE and Win32 )
    - can we use xMSA HH with ERP? If not - what this document refers for? : ( https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/f635d890-0201-0010-d8b2-8380c23456ed )
2. About the "Online" solutions
   - Could the ERP Internet Sales be used with Handheld?
   - and if yes what are the pros and cons against using custom WebDynpro or ITS?
Thank you in advance for your help,
Jordan

Dear Jordan,
If I am not wrong you are talking about internet sales for R/3 when you say ERP internet sales, which is probably outdated by now. Nowadays SAP distributes something called as mySAP Business Suite which in brief is as follows:
mySAP Business Suite :
CRM - Customer Relationship Management
ERP - Enterprise Resource Planning
SCM - Supply Chain Management
SRM - Supplier Relationship Management
PLM - Product Lifecycle Management
SAP Netweaver
Solution Manager
The current Mobile Sales solutions need mySAP CRM. Some of your questions about the xApp Mobile Sales for Hand Held are already answered in this wiki:
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/wiki?path=/display/home/xmsaHandheldClient
Also you can get the installation guide, release notes from here in SMP:
http://service.sap.com/~form/sapnet?_SHORTKEY=01100035870000668453&
About MSA HH 5.0 Device requirement- Yes you need to use Windows Mobile PDAs with Pocket PC 2003/ Windows Mobile5.0, Windows Mobile 6.0 OS.
There is another application, Mobile Sales Online, which can work with Blackberry Devices, technical information regarding which can be got from SMP here:
http://service.sap.com/~form/sapnet?_SHORTKEY=01100035870000614083&
The info is a bit vague but once you are through with them, you will have the clarity you need. Please mark this thread as answered and my post as solved if my post answers your queries.
Regards,
Veera
Edit: You may also get in touch with your local SAP contact to get the contact info of the product team/manager of both the products above for the best clarity possible.
Edited by: Veeraraagavan R on Mar 24, 2009 5:58 PM

WIreless solution with WDS/Active Directory/mutiple ssid

I'm in a project where the mail goal is to implement a wireless solution for our company.
I will try to explain our dimention.
We want two kinds of wireless solutions based on the same AP, secure and unsecure.
The unsecure is a "guest" net for Internet-access. We want a solution where the users have to contact our reseption to be given a username/password to access this network (same kind you find in airports, some hotels and so on). It has to be able to give a permanent access, access by the hour/day. Username/password can be random, but don't have to be.
The secure is a "work" net for our company computer services. We want the wireless network to be encrypted (a good standard) and the computer itself has to have some kind of certificate. We also want the user to authenticate itself using Microsoft Active Directory.
These two wireless networks should have their own SSID with different security levels. Both of them should support WDS.
Can somebody give me some information on which equipment we need, what kind of server services needes and so on.
The solution has to be robust, but of course the cost aspect is hanging over us as a ghost... ;-)
Regards
Eirik

Guest solution and secured wireless solution is very much possible with Cisco Unified wireless solution. The document available at http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk722/tk809/technologies_configuration_example09186a008070ba8f.shtml explains how to setup guest and internal WLAN in a network. This should help.

Getting existing wireless solution working with Windows 7 client

A bit new to this so need some help
I have been asked to do some innovation around an existing operational wireless solution.
Setup is;
1. Wireless client - running Juniper Odyssey client. This authenticates user on logon to Windows using username / SecurID token / pin. Configuration via WAP / TKIP
2. Cisco Aironet Wireless Access Point
3. Cisco 4402 Wireless LAN controller
4. Cisco ACS v4.1 - configured as RADIUS server with connection to external RSA Authentication Manager 6.1
As part of a transformation programme I have been asked to investigate whether this existing wireless infrsatructure will work with Windows 7 as the client operating system. Also to look whether the wireless functions in Windows 7 will allow the Odyssey client to be removed.
I am unsure what client if any I need to install on the Windows 7 client in order to try and get this working. Do I need the VPN client from Cisco, the RSA EAP client or will Win 7 allow me to do this.
Any help appreciated.

I am still struggling with this concept of suplicants
I have tried to set this up with the wireless capabilities in Windows 7 to no avail. I see that Windows 7 only supports certin EAP types - how can I find out what my EAP type is on the ACS server?

What Are the Differences Among Mobile Printing Solutions Supported by HP?

Some good information in the link below....
http://h10025.www1.hp.com/ewfrf/wc/document?cc=us&lc=en&docname=c02759940
Although I am an HP employee, I am speaking for myself and not for HP.
Twitter: @Ciara_B_HP

Check out the link below for further information on whether your printer supports the following
Apple AirPrint
HP ePrint
HP ePrint mobile app
HP All-in-One Printer Remote mobile app
Print solution for Android and Kindle devices
HP Printers and Supported Mobile Printing Solutions
http://h10025.www1.hp.com/ewfrf/wc/document?cc=us&lc=en&dlc=en&docname=c03722645
Although I am an HP employee, I am speaking for myself and not for HP.
Twitter: @Ciara_B_HP

Mobile Leave solution- EHP6/HR Renewal?

Hi Experts,
I have a requirement from the client on which I need to get the clarity. The background is that we have a ECC6 system with EHP6 implemented and a Enterprise Portal version 7.1 where the client is using its ESS/MSS services based on WDJAVA applications and on Home Page Framework. Please note that HR Renewal is not yet implemented but it is currently under considerations.
Now the requirement is that client want to have Mobile Leave solution for Leave Request & Approval functionality. We already have got some idea on Fiori but we want to understand if there is any other functionality available apart from Fiori in HR Renewal- EHP6 which we can leverage from SAP for our client to fulfill the demand for Mobile Leave solution?
Awaiting your response.
Many Thanks!
Regards
Sahil Kohli
Tags edited by: Michael Appleby

Hi Sahil,
Technically, any SAPUI5 application should work in any platform. That mean, the applications will work on mobile browsers.
As far as i know, UI5 applications in HR renewal have surely been built with a some consideration of mobile devices. However, i would not jump the gun and tell you that it will work seamlessly on all mobile devices. On large screen devices like ipad->OK. But on small screen devices like iphone->not OK, it will be like viewing a website in desktop mode in the tiny mobile browser. The app would not automatically re-arrange itself to suit the small screen of an iphone. However, fiori apps are different. The sap.m UI library helps fiori apps to resize the UI and re-arrange the layout based upon the screen size. Also the fiori apps are optimized for touchscreen devices, which i do not think would be the case with the UI5 applications in HR Renewal.
Fiori definitely scores higher if your requirement is to ensure the leave request and approvals work seamlessly on all platforms especially mobile. Saying that you should decide not only based on the platform you need but also on the functionality you plan to have in the apps. Since you say that your client is running on WD java of leave request, it might be necessary to gauge the change in the functionality between WD Java and HR renewal UI5 or Fiori. For example, 'My Leave Request' fiori app does not show the team calendar when you create a new leave request. Similarly you might need to check the functionality available in both new apps before deciding.
Hope this info helps.
Best Regards,
Varun

Need Help on Cisco Wireless Solution!

Hello Netpros!
I have some issues that probably most of wireless implementers faced after implementing a wireless solution. This is an actual feedback from the customer and These issues can be broken down to the following:
1. The wireless Network is slow! (wireless performance)
The customer has Airtight in placed and airtight reports that users are mostly connected to the wireless network on 2 mbps speed. Users also says that their network experience using wireless are slow compared to wired network.
My question is what reports or guides that cisco wireless cotroller system or WLC can shows that proves the network is working as it is intended. Any guides on how to improve the user experience? Any guide from Cisco IT?
During these slowness, what reports from WCS or WLC that can best shows the problems and helps us implementers to mitigate the problem?
2. Baseline Wireless Performance.
When asked about a baseline performance of wireless network, what reports from the WCS or WLC that can show this and what is the acceptable or baseline values?
3. Is there a general guideline on how to use WCS or WLC reporting tools to troubleshoot a wireless performance issue? What reports to see? and how to translate that to say to the customer that the wireless network is under performing?
The main reasons i am asking these questions is because i cannot find any useful documents in cisco that guides the wireless implementers on how to use the reports generated by WCS or WLC when it concerns the performance of the wireless.
Most of the reports WCS generate that relates to the performance normally rounds up the AP performance, channel, noise, but how to translate that to user concerns is another matter.
Perhaps these issues are partly due to user expectations or maybe the wireless setup need to be tweaked or even might requires a spectrum analyzer to pinpoint interferences.
In either cases, I hope netpros can help direct me to good documentation albeit from cisco or other sources that can best outline wireless performance reporting using cisco wcs and wlc.
Background information:
The wireless network setup has one WCS, one location appliance, 4 WLCs and around 150 to 200 APs, most running Local and some running HREAP. Most of the issues concerns the local type APs.
Thanking all in advance!
maldin

Yup,
thats what we told the customer and even showed them the wlc/wcs reports.
Unfortunately, these customers are lacking in wireless knowledge and they want a streamlined, documented steps to generate the reports and also to help them understand in laymen terms.
At the moment we are formulating a holistic approach to the customer to get them understand wireless first, get them to have a policy and enforce and then drill down to management, reporting and troubleshooting.
The thing is, the wireless is always working fine, but sometimes so it happens some bigshots unable to connect to the wireless network in meeting rooms or somewhere and the become jumpy and pointing fingers.
So the IT manager wants to reduces the finger pointing by having the WLC/WCS to produce reports to them.

Forescout mobile security solution vs Cisco ISE

Hi,
Can anyone provide me any link or document for comparison between "Forescout mobile security solution vs Cisco ISE".
Thanks in Advance
Manthan

Manthan,
Please ask your question in AAA, Identity and NAC community. There are experts in that community who can asnwer this question.
-Rajeev

How to share mobile wireless connection from Win XP to mac?

Hi,
I have two comupters,one mac and one PC (win XP). I am trying to share the mobile wireless broadband from my PC to the mac. I set up the sharing from mac to PC successfully quite a while ago, but now I need to work extensively on mac. So I tried to set up the sharing in the other around and nothing worked at all. Here is what I did.
1. I enabled the sharing of the mobile wireless connection on PC.
2. I tried to set up a small/home network, but it didn't work on Mac as the windows softwares can't be run on mac
3. I also tried to set up a peer-to-peer connection from PC to Mac which also didn't work.
Does anyone how to do the sharing from PC to Mac? Thanks a lot!

Okay, firstly some routers or mdoems come with 2 ports on the back so you can connect two different computers so simply plug them both in
if not, then i advise you buy a router which allows you to add numerous computers to the same network via wires or add numerous computers wirelessly
i have one computer connect to my netgear router -wired
i have one computer wirelessly connected with a Netgear USB wireless reciever
then i got my laptop which is connected via wireless
i have xbox live which i connect to the internet via my laptops wireless connection, this can be done with any pc or laptop aswell
what you do is
wireless networks - where it showws any detected networks
change advanced options - on the side
advanced tab
then allow other computers to use this computers internet connection
simple as
all you do is plug in your other pc or whatever

Meraki vs Cisco Wireless Solutions

Can anybody out there share any information on company called Meraki? We currently have a Cisco wireless solution but our administration has suddenly been looking into Meraki as a replacement. Any info would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks...

I actually have both product sets running- our main campus network has over 3,000 APs (Cisco) and we have a 6-month old Meraki installation on our London campus with 35 MR16 APs. While our lightwieght Cisco deployment has been mostly fine on the client-facing side of life, we have had a lot of angst with controllers (we've been in the game since 2006 on LWAPP/CAPWAP, with hundreds of Aeronet fat APs prior) and various code versions through the years. I also follow the industry pretty closely as an IT writer, and so have watched the likes of Aerohive get more interesting (also controllerless) and architectures like Motorola's WiNG 5 greatly de-emphasize the controller. Personally, I've become a lot more open-minded about the cloud and cynical about the expense and grief of controllers. But it's far from black and white- there is no "this is clearly better than that", especially when you've got a wild mix of client devices that just want the network to work and could care less whose label is on the AP.
Bake-offs have validity, but more so (to me) on the "how easy is it to administer" perspective than "will it work for clients?" front. Both our Meraki and Cisco environments nicely serve our clients in dense environments- if they didn't, they wouldn't stay in business. The interference detection and reporting is somewhat overmarketed (again, my opinion) as often interference sources are fleeting and you can't possibly react to every one. Meraki has provided a lot of for things like rate limiting, firewalling, a great guest portal (I can't speak favorably of Cisco's guest portal at all, and BlueSocket has the absolute best I've seen yet) that our Cisco controllers don't do without help from outside boxes- but if you already have those boxes you may not care. I do take Cisco to task on really clunky debug in the CAPWAP world, and there are often gaps between what you can do with WCS/NCS and what you have to do on the controllers directly. The point? Again, it's just not black and white.
For me, I would certainly go with Meraki again for deployments up to a certain size- like a few hundred APs- as one who is living the Meraki life currently and cringes at the price controllers fetch. It does flawless with 802.1x and has a pretty robust feature set in it (not sure why someone above is saying it doesn't)- if you need it. I've had zero problems since putting Meraki in where as I can't wait to get rid of my WiSMs in favor of 5508s (but really wish cisco would provide a VM-based controller like Bluesocket does), but both products have warts at times on the UI. Things I've griped about Meraki was quick to address or put on the short road map, Cisco not so much but eventually they resond to enough grousing. (Yes- my opinion only)
Enough rambling- I'd say visit customers that have both, and don't discount either until you do. Cisco has market share, Meraki is part of the interesting new guard that dares to do things differently. They both work, but you have to find what's right for you.

Mobile wireless solutions

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for