Mobility between Cisco WLC and Meraki(other vendor)

Is it possible that users can roam between Cisco WLC and other vendor wireless gear? Meraki keeps saying it is possible.
They keep saying it is a IEEE feature and everone should support but I do not understand how?

While theoretically possible with the adoption of capwap, it would require all the manufacturers to follow the specs exactly the same. Kind of like hearding cats, not impossible, but highly unlikely.. That's just my opinion
Sent from Cisco Technical Support iPad App

Similar Messages

STS Tunnel in between Cisco ASA and Meraki Firewall

Hello Experts,
We are in process of configuring the syslog server which is placed at remote site and the STS Tunnel is established to send the Meraki syslogs over the Tunnel which is working fine. The local LANS of both sites can communicate each other without issue but we are facing an issue wherein when the traffic leaves the traffic from Meraki firewall then it uses the Meraki wan interface IP and in syslog it's being used as a source which can't be added in encryption list on Meraki firewall unfortunately as there is no option available to get the wan IP added to encryption list. Can somebody please advise on how to solve this issue? I also searched an option to get the source IP changed from wan to Inside interface IP which is still not possible on Meraki firewall.

I am not very familiar with Meraki, but I did come across this document...hope it will help you out.
https://kb.meraki.com/knowledge_base/syslog-server-overview-and-configuration
Please remember to select a correct answer and rate helpful posts

Cisco wlc and steel belted radius

we have cisco wlc controller that have two ssid one for user and one for guest
we need the user in ssid 1 take user name and password from user group in active directory through steel belted radiu
please send to me any integrated guide between cisco wlc and steel belted radius
regards

Hi Mohammad,
I am unaware of a specific Steel Belted RADIUS intrgration guide for the WLCs, however the configuration process on the controller will be the same:
Cisco WLC Configuration Guide 7.0 - Configuring RADIUS:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/wireless/controller/7.0/configuration/guide/c70sol.html#wp1388328
You may wish to contact your RADIUS vendor for additional configuration steps on the server.
Best,
Drew

Routing issue between Cisco Nexus and Cisco 4510 R+E Chassis

We have configured Cisco Nexus 7K9 as core and Cisco 4510 R+E as access switches for Server connectivity.
We are experiencing problem in terms of ARP learning and Ping issues between Cisco Nexus and end hosts.

Hi,
So you have N7k acting as L3 with servers connected to 4510?.
Do you see the MAC associated with failing ARP in 4510?. Is it happening with all or few servers?. Just to verify if it is connectivity issue between N7k and 4510, you can configure an SVI on 4510 and assign address from same raneg (server/core range) and perform a ping.
This will help narrow down if issue is between server to 4510 or 4510 to N7k.
Thanks,
Nagendra

The difference of the IEEE802.1x Auth between Cisco Routers and Catalyst switches

Hello
I am investigating the difference of the IEEE802.1x Auth between Routers and Switches.
Basically dot1x auth is availlable on Catalyst Switches. however if I want to check to
PortBased Multi-Auth , MAC address Auth and any certification Auth with this feature,
Is it possible to integrate into Cisco Router such as Cisco 891F ?
In my opinion Cisco891F is also available to use basic IEEE802.1x but if it compares with Catalyst switches such as Cat3560X
I think there might be any unsupported feature on Cisco 891F.
I appreciate any information. thank you very much in advance.
Best Regards,
Masanobu Hiyoshi

Many time in interviews asked comaprison between cisco routers and switches that i was answerless bcoz i dont have much knowledge about that.Can anyone provide me the compariosin sheet of the same.how are the cisco devices differ with each other how much Bandwidth each routres support and Etc...
Ummmm ... The most common question I get is "what is the difference between a router and a switch".
However, if you get a question like this, then my impression to this line of questioning are:
1. The candidate they are looking for has in-depth knowledge of routers and switches. And I mean IN-DEPTH!;
2. They are not looking for a candidate. They just want to stroke their ego. There is not alot of people who can give you the "names and numbers" of routers and switches at a snap of a finger. And if you do happen to know the answer, then and there, then expect a tougher follow-up question.

VPN between cisco WRVS4400N and EdgeMarc

Hi Experts
Please help me.
Is it possible to create VPN between cisco WRVS4400N and EdgeMarc appliance.
Regards,
Ejaz

Hi Ejaz
I don't expect any cisco folks that answer this community to be expert on EdgeMarc, but i may be wrong..
We employ a open standard IPSec implementation.
Here is the open source document that relates to the RV220W.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/routers/csbr/rv220w/open_source/OSD_RV220W_78-19892-02.pdf
The question could have been, have you asked EsgeMarc if they wiork with open standard based IPSec implemations on our routers.
I would prefer you look at the RV220W if possible, which is a relatively young product.
I am guessing since you can source a product from Disti, try one and see if it works.
The beauty of buying from a Cisco Disti Partner, is they they have a returns policy. Check out that policy, if you wish and keep the packaging and try out your application.
Answered a question with someone trying to form a IPSec link to a OEM firewall/ IPSec gateway ..it worked. so give your application a try
regards Dave.

Difference between Cisco DCNM and CISCO Fabric Manager

Hello Everyone,
I am new to Cisco SAN and just would like to know the differences between cisco DCNM and Cisco Fabric manager and which one is latest as of now.
regards
VINAY

Hi Viany,
Fabric Manager was renamed DCNM starting at 5.2.
Fabric Manager only monitors SAN Fabrics, while DCNM 5.2 and above can monitor both SAN Fabrics and Ethernet LANs.
Regards,
David

Connection between 5508 WLC and 3750-24PS switch

I have to realize a connection between an 5508 WLC and 3750 switch using one SFP cable. I found on Cisco documentation some reference about two different SFP cables.
The first one is CAB-SFP-50CM, but this is used to interconnect two 3560 switches.
The second is SFP-H10GB-CU1M. This one has SFP+ transceivers on both ends which I don’t know if are compatible with the standard SFP ports that can be found both on WLC and switch.
My question is if I can use one of these cables in order to connect my devices, or if you know other one piece SFP cables.
Many thanks

I know that you can use those SFP transceivers, but I want to know if someone tried to use the SFP-H10GB cables for this kind of connection. Because I saw on another vendor website that the SFP+ cables are compatible with standard SFP ports, and I wanted to see if it is the same for Cisco cables too.
Regards

Inline Posture between Cisco ISE and Wireless LAN Controller

Hi,
I was looking into Cisco ISE solution for deploying NAC.
I have a question about the network topology.
In the user guide documents of cisco ISE, it is written that for Wireless LAN Controllers (WLC) and VPN devices, an additional server, Inline Posture, is needed.
However, in the following integration document, there is not an inline posture between WLC and Cisco ISE server.
https://supportforums.cisco.com/docs/DOC-18121
I want to know if Inline Posture is a requirement, if not a requirement, what are the benefits of having it between Cisco ISE Server and WLC.
Thanks & Regards
Sinan

Hello,
Please go through below mentioned links which might be helpful for you.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/ise/1.2/user_guide/ise_ipep_deploy.html
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/ise/1.2/installation_guide/ise_deploy.html
Best Regards,

Wireless mobility between 2 WLC's

Hi all, when using 2 controllers, is it possible to sync the config between them automatically? or do you always have to do it on both manually?

I agree, pushing templates via WCS is definitely the right way to manage the WLCs. We have been asking about a feature that would allow you to compare two WLC configs for quite some time. I understand that WCS will have a feature soon that will help with that.
If you don't have WCS, you could always take a config you're confident with from a WLC and upload that to another WLC. You'll have to have that second WLC off the network of course and use the service port to accomplish this. Once you have the config on the second WLC, you just have to change specific settings (like system name, interface ip's, mobility members, etc.) before putting it back on the network.
No doubt more work that it should be...

GRE IPSec between Cisco 2811 and FortiGate 110C

Hello,
Does anybody know if it is possible to configure GRE IPSec tunnel between Cisco 2811 router and FortiGate 110C firewall? I know that FortiGate supports IPSec and GRE tunnels, but maybe somebody succeeded in establishing an IPSec GRE between those routers? Could you also give a link to the appropriate documentation if it is possible?

Hi,
You can configure the GRE tunnel on the 2811.
I'm aware that you can configure sort of a GRE tunnel on the Fortinet as well, but I have not seen a GRE tunnel between a Cisco and other vendor.
I've only seen GRE tunnels between Cisco devices (however I have not tried it to assure you that it will not work :-()
Federico.

Routing issue between Cisco device and Virtual machine

Hi Guys,
We have two local subnets in a virtualized environment, subnet 1 has a VM operating as a firewall, we would like all traffic for subnet 2 to go via VM on subnet 1, this will police traffic on subnet 2 and then reroute.
The infrastructure involved comprises,
Internet Edge Switch -> ASA -> Core Switch -> IBM Flex chassis
The Internet edge switch is directly connected between the ISP routers and the Cisco ASA firewall pair (A/S). The ASA is then connected to the Core switch. Connected from the core switch is an IBM Flex chassis, via a port channel (all vlans allowed)
The local subnets in question are as follows:
Vlan 101 (10.1.1.0/24)
Vlan 102 (10.2.1.0/24)
The VM in question has two NIC cards having IP address of both subnets.
NIC 1: 10.1.1.1
NIC 2: 10.2.1.1
We would like packets destined for 10.2.1.1 to land on 10.1.1.1 IP address. At the moment traffic for each vlan routes from the outside to their respective local subnets successfully, what we are having difficulty with is directing traffic for subnet 2 via subnet 1 VM firewall.
At the moment we have tried adding a static route on the core switch but it didn’t work
ip route 10.2.0.0 255.255.255.0 10.1.1.1
I will appreciate if you could share your knowledge and guide me how to achieve this goal.
Thanks in advance :-)

Hi,
I think for this to work you need a transit vlan between the VMs and the core switch. So, if you have 2 vlans on the VM (101 and 102) you use the VM switch to route between the vlans and in order to go outside the local vlans you would use the core switch. In this scenario you would not have an SVI (layer-3) interface on the core. The only thing that core will have is the layer-2 vlans (101 and102). You would than need a static route on the core switch to point to the transit vlan on the VM side.
so, for example, if the transit vlan is vlan 110 and the ip is 192.168.1.0/24
on the core you have static routes:
ip route 10.1.1.0/24 192.168.1.2 (VM side)
ip route 10.1.2.0/24 192.168.1.2 (VM side)
You also need an SVI for vlan 110 with ip address 192.168.1.1/24 on the core.
on the VM you need a default route to point to the core (192.168.1.1).
Is this what you are trying to do?
HTH

Is there any documentation to deploy federation between Cisco IM and presence and Lync 2010 sister companies?

Hello All,
Company A – Using Cisco IM and Presence
Company B – Using Microsoft Lync 2010
We would like to establish federation between Company A and Company B and also looking for the documentation which has the step by step instruction.
Please let us know overall steps or provide us the documentation. Thank you in advance.
Thanks

For Federation between Lync and Cisco IM, you can check below link and this
document
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/voice_ip_comm/cucm/im_presence/interdomain_federation/9_0_1/CUP0_BK_IAAE17D8_00_integration-guide-interdomain-federation-90/CUP0_BK_IAAE17D8_00_integration-guide-interdomain-federation-90_chapter_01.html
Please remember, if you see a post that helped you please click "Vote As Helpful" and if it answered your question, please click "Mark As Answer"
Mai Ali | My blog: Technical | Twitter:
Mai Ali

Certificate based authentication with Cisco WLC and Juniper IC

Hi
I have a cisco WLC 4400 and Juniper IC which works as the external Radius server.
I want the wireless clients to be authenticated using certificates. I know the Juniper IC can understand certificates.
My question is can cisco WLC understand that the information being presented to it by the client is not username/pwd but a user certificate.
i have also looked at this article :
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/wireless/4400-series-wireless-lan-controllers/100590-ldap-eapfast-config.html
What i don't understand here is the need of WLC authenticating the user with his credentials by LDAP when it has authenticated the user cert.
All your help is appreciated.

Hi,
Since you use an external radius server you don't have to worry for this.
The only config that you need to do on WLC is to define the radius server under Security-AAA-Radius-Authentication and on your WLAN-Security-AAA.
The doc you refer is only for Local Radius on WLC.
Hope this helps
Regards,
Christos

RSPAN Between Cisco UCS and 6500

Hi,
I need to SPAN traffic comming one server inside UCS and the destination as my 6500 core. I tried to get some document to check how to configure RPSN between UCS and 6500. Please guide
Thanks
Nibin

You've answered your own question in the first sentence.
To recap: OS X is licensed only on Apple-branded hardware. Cisco-branded hardware is not Apple-branded hardware. Therefore, OS X is not licensed on Cisco-branded hardware.

Mobility between Cisco WLC and Meraki(other vendor)

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for