Mobility Group

How man wirelesslancontrollers are permited configure into the same mobility group?

Hi Ricardo,
Just to add a clip to the good info from David and Larry (5 points to both of you!);
A mobility group can include up to 24 controllers of any type. The number of access points supported in a mobility group is bound by the number of controllers and controller types in the group.
Examples:
1. A 4404-100 controller supports up to 100 access points. Therefore, a mobility group consisting of 24 4404-100 controllers supports up to 2400 access points (24 * 100 = 2400 access points).
2. A 4402-25 controller supports up to 25 access points, and a 4402-50 controller supports up to 50 access points. Therefore, a mobility group consisting of 12 4402-25 controllers and 12 4402-50 controllers supports up to 900 access points (12 * 25 + 12 * 50 = 300 + 600 = 900 access points).
From this good doc;
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/wireless/controller/4.0/configuration/guide/c40mobil.html
Hope this helps!
Rob

Similar Messages

Assigning Mobile Group to a User

I plan to use the <i>Mobile Group</i> filter for a SyncBO, to avoid too large data volumes on clients - BUT I find it very hard to administer through MEREP_PD and impossible to assign a user to a mobile group in advance of application deployment.
We are dealing with approx. 30 users and they should be allocated to 6 different Mobile Groups. Is there a way to allocate Users to Mobile Groups in advance of application deployment ?
Thanks.
Lars

after creating user in OID (which creates a user for portal also) You shold run the procedure in the portal schema:
PROCEDURE setdefgroup (
p_username varchar2,
p_groupname varchar2) IS
v_group_id number;
BEGIN
v_group_id := WWSEC_API.GROUP_ID
(p_name => upper(p_groupname));
wwsec_api.set_defaultgroup
(p_groupid => v_group_id,
p_username => upper(p_username));
END;
to asign the default group to a user.

Mobility Group Table *MUST* be populated in each WLC in same mobility group

For what it's worth,
I recently discovered that when you have multiple controllers and want to implement Mobility Groups, more is needed than simply entering the same Default Mobility Group Name for each controller within the mobility group. The following is required:
a) The IP address of the "Virtual" interface on each controller must be identical on each controller within the mobility group.
b) The Default Mobility Group Name must be identical on each controller within the mobility group (case sensitive).
c) The mobility table must be populated with an entry for each controller within the mobility group.
Otherwise, you will see some inexplicable behavior such as:
* LWAP access points refusing to change to a different controller, even if their primary controller is explicitly set and the LWAP is rebooted.
* LWAP access points unable to find any other wireless controller other than the one pointed to by the "CISCO-LWAPP-CONTROLLER" DNS entry (presumably, this would also be the case if DHCP Option 43 is used to point the LWAP to a controller). Once the first controller reaches its max. capacity of LWAPs, no more LWAPs can join.
* Even MASTER CONTROLLER MODE has no effect.
Cisco TAC was able to explain the great mystery of the Mobilty Group Table to me. However, unless you know your problem is related to mobility groups issues, you might not know to start there (I know I didn't).
The least difficult method I have found for populating the mobility group table is as follows:
Build a text file with one entry for each controller in the mobility group as follows:
Log into the GUI for each controller and selecting: Controller -> Mobility Management -> Mobility Groups, click the "EDIT ALL" button and copy the MAC and IP address from the text box into a text file using NOTEPAD. Repeat this for each controller, creating a new line for each:
The format for the entries is as follows:
00:1a:6c:91:22:A0 192.168.20.44
00:1a:6c:91:22:B4 192.168.20.45
Once the text file is completed (one entry for each controller in the mobilit group), click the EDITALL button and copy the entire contents of the text file and paste it into the text box on the controller GUI, click the APPLY button and click Save Changes. Repeat for each controller.
Again, make sure that the following settings are IDENTICAL in each of the controllers in the Mobility Group:
* The IP address of the "virtual" interface ( Controller -> interfaces ) must be the same on all controllers.
* The "Default Mobility Domain Name" ( Controller -> General ) must be identical on each controller in the mobility group (note: the Mobility Domain Name is case sensitive).
After making changes directly to the controllers, a "refresh from controller" in the WCS might be needed to get the WCS to attempt to synchronize itself with the controllers.
Here is a link to the 4.2 Wireless Controller Configuration Guide which discusses this in greater detail.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6366/products_configuration_guide_chapter09186a00808e638b.html
It is unfortunate that there are currently no mechanisms in the WCS 4.2 to make these changes in bulk (i.e.: The WCS has no Controller Template to do this).
Also, if you ever need to replace a controller, you will need to update the Mobility Group Table in each controller in the Mobility Group (since the tables will have the MAC address of the old controller which will now be different in the new replacement controller).
Despite having used the "unified" product for some time now, there are still surprises from time to time. I just thought that I would share my experience for those who may want avoid it and/or who may be encountering any of odd the behavior described above.
- John

Hi John,
Nice work with this very relevant info! Please post a short reply here so that we can give this the nice rating it deserves :)
Thanks again!
Rob

WLC 5508 * 2 & Mobility Group

What I am trying to configure is Mobility Groups.
My understanding is that this will allow AP to successfully register and fail over over seamlessly if any of the WLC had to fail ?
It could be I am confusing two things into one :( & I am totally confused and not understanding the benefits of mobility group mentioned above.
Also when a AP starts up and registers with the WLC ......I click on a registered AP > High Availability ( Primary / Sec / Tertiary ) all fields are blank...
Initially I also thought that once my SSO is all setup and working than those options "AP > High Availability" will get populated automatically but clearly not unless something is not working.
My current config is as follows:-
WLC 5508 * 2
WLC 1 - Primary
WLC 2 - HA SKU (Secondary )
Redundancy = SSO (Both AP and Client SSO)
=============
(Cisco Controller) >show sysinfo
Manufacturer's Name.............................. Cisco Systems Inc.
Product Name..................................... Cisco Controller
Product Version.................................. 7.6.130.0
Bootloader Version............................... 1.0.20
Field Recovery Image Version..................... 7.6.101.1
Firmware Version................................. FPGA 1.7, Env 1.8, USB console 2.2
Build Type....................................... DATA + WPS
System Name...................................... WLC5508
System Location..................................
System Contact...................................
System ObjectID.................................. 1.3.6.1.4.1.9.1.1069
Redundancy Mode.................................. SSO (Both AP and Client SSO)
IP Address....................................... 10.31.66.21
Last Reset....................................... Software reset
System Up Time................................... 0 days 22 hrs 39 mins 57 secs
System Timezone Location......................... (GMT) London, Lisbon, Dublin, Edinburgh
System Stats Realtime Interval................... 5
System Stats Normal Interval..................... 180
Configured Country............................... GB - United Kingdom
Operating Environment............................ Commercial (0 to 40 C)
--More-- or (q)uit
Internal Temp Alarm Limits....................... 0 to 65 C
Internal Temperature............................. +38 C
External Temperature............................. +21 C
Fan Status....................................... OK
State of 802.11b Network......................... Enabled
State of 802.11a Network......................... Enabled
Number of WLANs.................................. 1
Number of Active Clients......................... 0
Burned-in MAC Address............................ F8:72:EA:EE:5B:B2
Power Supply 1................................... Present, OK
Power Supply 2................................... Absent
Maximum number of APs supported.................. 500
============================================
TA

TA,
Mobility and mobility groups are used for the wireless users roaming. What we know that a wireless users can roam between different APs within the same WLC, but when the SSID is used within multiple WLCs, and the client wanted to roam to an AP joined to another WLC, you would need to configure WLC mobility to maintain seamless roaming. For more info:
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/wireless/controller/8-0/configuration-guide/b_cg80/b_cg80_chapter_010001101.html
Now, I understand that your purpose is to have high availability for your APs. No this is done traditionally from the AP page, under HA tab, where you configure the WLCs names and IPs there. This can be done manually on each AP (you can use CLI to make it easier) or you can push a configuration template using a management server (WCS/NCS/CPI).
Configuring HA on the AP:
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/wireless/controller/8-0/configuration-guide/b_cg80/b_cg80_chapter_01110000.html
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/wireless/controller/8-0/configuration-guide/b_cg80/b_cg80_chapter_01110001.html
Using CPI to push AP configuration templates:
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/wireless/prime_infrastructure/2-0/configuration/guide/pi_20_cg/temp.html
Now mobility may play a role in this, as if you have already configured mobility for your WLCs, then you won't need to configure a "name" for the WLCs when you add them under the HA tab in AP configuration page. That's it.
BR, Ala

What will happen when I remove controllers from mobility groups?

Hi,
I'm wondering what exactly will happen when I remove a controller from a mobility group?
1) Will it require a reboot? (I don't think so, nothing I've found says so)
2) Will it deauth/reauth the AP's connected (I don't think so, nothing I've found says so)
3) Will it do anything else goofy?
I have 2 RF groups spanning continents over low speed links. All that is transmitted over mobility groups is session data correct? Not usernames, not ??? What am I missing here? I'm banging my head against the wall because I can't figure out why someone would configure the system in this way.
Setup:
WLC 4404, WLC 2100's
WCS 5.2.148
11xx series AP's
Radius Auth for domain users
a few SSID's, one guest SSID, no DHCP on any of the controllers
Thanks in advance,

Hi,
I'm wondering what exactly will happen when I remove a controller from a mobility group?
1) Will it require a reboot? (I don't think so, nothing I've found says so)
2) Will it deauth/reauth the AP's connected (I don't think so, nothing I've found says so)
3) Will it do anything else goofy?
I have 2 RF groups spanning continents over low speed links. All that is transmitted over mobility groups is session data correct? Not usernames, not ??? What am I missing here? I'm banging my head against the wall because I can't figure out why someone would configure the system in this way.
Setup:
WLC 4404, WLC 2100's
WCS 5.2.148
11xx series AP's
Radius Auth for domain users
a few SSID's, one guest SSID, no DHCP on any of the controllers
Thanks in advance,

N+1 redundancy and different mobility groups

Is it possible to backup 2 controllers with 2 different mobility groups (for example GROUP1 and GROUP2) to the same backup controller (running HA SKU N+1 (7.4)) ?
Since a controller can only be configured in 1 mobility group, this doesn't seem to be possible. Can someone confirm ?
regards,
Geert

Hello,
As per your query i can suggest you the following solution-
In all Wireless LAN Controller (WLC) versions earlier than 4.2.61.0, when a WLC goes "down," the LAP registered to this WLC can failover only to another WLC of the same Mobility Group, if the LAP is configured for failover. From Cisco WLC version 4.2.61.0 and later, a new feature called Backup Controller Support is introduced for access points to failover to controllers even outside the Mobility Group. Refer to Wireless LAN Controller and Light Weight Access Points Failover Outside the Mobility Group Configuration Example for more information.
Hope this will help you.

HA N+1 and Mobility Groups

Hi all,
One question, can I have 2 WLC's on different Mobility Groups pointing to the same HA N+1 WLC which is located in one of those Mobility Groups?. I have not seen any note about this on the Cisco documentation I have checked.
thanks

From 7.4 onwards AP can fail over to a WLC even they are in different mobility group. So I think this set up should work without any problem.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/wireless/controller/7.4/configuration/guides/consolidated/b_cg74_CONSOLIDATED_chapter_01110011.html
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/wireless/technology/hi_avail/N1_HA_Overview.html
HTH
Rasika
*** Pls rate all useful responses ****

WiSM redundancy, mobility groups and RF groups

Hi there
we would like to implement the following:
- Support for about 2000 LAP's
- 1 x Catalyst 6509
- 1 x Sup 720
- 7 x WiSM's
What I'm interesting is are the following points:
1. I thought that we would build the switch completly redudant, so we have to wlan switches (switch A and B) with 7 WiSM's eatch. So I can garanty a N+N redundancy --> each LAP's has a primary controller on switch A and it's secondary controller on switch B. The LAP's can be splitted on the two switches, but for your understanding there is a 1:1 redundancy. What do you think of this design, is the too much or is this appropriate?
2. As I know you can build up a mobility group of a maximum of 24 controllers or 12 WiSM's. I would put only these controllers in a mobility group, where Layer 2 roaming can occure.
3. But what is about the RF groups - there is a maximum of 1000 LAP's, so I can put only 3 WiSM's in one group. But this would not work form me, then I would have 2 WiSM's on switch A and only 1 WiSM on switch B in a RF group (not a 1:1 redundancy). First is it possible to put WiSM-A and WiSM-B into different RF groups, I think so because they are logically splitted, aren't they?
And what RF group design would be best (just as a reference)? I thought that it would make sense to form a RF group for each of the seven pairs (1 WiSM on switch A and 1 WiSM on switch B) for redundancy? What do you think of that approach?
4. So I would have 1 mobility group and 7 RF groups. Or do you recommend to form the mobility groups like the RF groups? But what happens with Layer 2 roaming in that case?
I'm sorry for the long and messy text, but I hope you can see my design questions?
Thanks a lot in advance.
Dominic

It sounds like you already have some good replies. Personally I like N+1 redundancy, but that is a designers choice. One thing I should point out is that the 6500 can only support 5 WiSM cards each. In this case a 4 WiSM x 3 chassis option would give your more spare capacity with only 12 total cards. The lower WiSM cost (12 vs 14) would help offset the cost of the extra chassis. You could also support 2400 APs with 8 WiSM cards even if one switch is down.
Not too long ago Cisco added the ability to set the priority of APs so your critical ones would join a controller and the less critical ones would go down if a controller failed and there were no redundancy. That is something to keep in mind when designing wireless. You may not need redundancy for all APs and that could affect your design and costs.
Randy

WLC 7.3.101.0 Mobility group peer cannot up.

Hi Guys,
It seems the 7.3.101 version Mobility group peer cannot up,: refer to the attach,
Peer 1: version: 7.3.101
Peer 2: version 7.0.98
Peer3: version 7.2.103
Today we got new two WLC for Anchor use, and config the mobility group, but it's failed and cannot up, the ping is ok.

Chris is right here. One thing I tell my clients is to allow everything between the foreign and the anchor WLC's just to verify that the mobility can come up, then lock it down. Here is some links that explain what test is for what port.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6366/products_qanda_item09186a00809a30cc.shtml#qa8
Anchor Controller Positioning
Because the anchor controller is responsible for termination of guest WLAN traffic and subsequent access to the Internet, it is typically positioned in the enterprise Internet DMZ. In doing so, rules can be established within the firewall to precisely manage communications between authorized controllers throughout the enterprise and the anchor controller. Such rules might including filtering on source or destination controller addresses, UDP port 16666 for inter-WLC communication, and IP protocol ID 97 Ethernet in IP for client traffic. Other rules that might be needed include the following:
•TCP 161 and 162 for SNMP
•UDP 69 for TFTP
•TCP 80 or 443 for HTTP, or HTTPS for GUI access
•TCP 23 or 22 for Telnet, or SSH for CLI access
Depending on the topology, the firewall can be used to protect the anchor controller from outside threats.
For the best possible performance and because of its suggested positioning in the network, it is strongly recommended that the guest anchor controller be dedicated to supporting guest access functions only. In other words, the anchor controller should not be used to support guest access in addition to controlling and managing other LWAPP APs (LAPs) in the enterprise.
Sent from Cisco Technical Support iPhone App

Mobility groups with multicast - 7.4.100.60

Hello all,
I am not sure if this is a bug, but here we go. I configured 2 controllers in a mobility group using multicast signalling.
I expect that from the moment i enable multicast, the controller joins this group AND STAYS IN THIS GROUP so he will get messages from all other controllers.
On the first hop router, i can see the join:
#sh ip igmp mem 239.194.248.10
Flags: A - aggregate, T - tracked
       L - Local, S - static, V - virtual, R - Reported through v3
       I - v3lite, U - Urd, M - SSM (S,G) channel
       1,2,3 - The version of IGMP, the group is in
Channel/Group-Flags:
       / - Filtering entry (Exclude mode (S,G), Include mode (G))
Reporter:
       <mac-or-ip-address> - last reporter if group is not explicitly tracked
       <n>/<m>      - <n> reporter in include mode, <m> reporter in exclude
Channel/Group                  Reporter        Uptime   Exp. Flags Interface
*,239.194.248.10               10.102.78.98    00:00:05 02:54 2A     Vl350
However, this entry does not get refreshed. I have the impression that the controller does not reply to the IGMP general queries:
IGMP(0): Send v2 general Query on Vlan350 -> no replies
#sh ip igmp mem 239.194.248.10
Flags: A - aggregate, T - tracked
       L - Local, S - static, V - virtual, R - Reported through v3
       I - v3lite, U - Urd, M - SSM (S,G) channel
       1,2,3 - The version of IGMP, the group is in
Channel/Group-Flags:
       / - Filtering entry (Exclude mode (S,G), Include mode (G))
Reporter:
       <mac-or-ip-address> - last reporter if group is not explicitly tracked
       <n>/<m>      - <n> reporter in include mode, <m> reporter in exclude
Channel/Group                  Reporter        Uptime   Exp. Flags Interface
*,239.194.248.10               10.102.78.98    00:02:35 00:24 2A     Vl350
>> 20 seconds from expiry.
#sh ip igmp mem 239.194.248.10
Flags: A - aggregate, T - tracked
       L - Local, S - static, V - virtual, R - Reported through v3
       I - v3lite, U - Urd, M - SSM (S,G) channel
       1,2,3 - The version of IGMP, the group is in
Channel/Group-Flags:
       / - Filtering entry (Exclude mode (S,G), Include mode (G))
Reporter:
       <mac-or-ip-address> - last reporter if group is not explicitly tracked
       <n>/<m>      - <n> reporter in include mode, <m> reporter in exclude
Channel/Group                  Reporter        Uptime   Exp. Flags Interface
>> 20 seconds later, gone
>> At this moment the controller doesn't receive any messages anymore from remote controllers:
>>sh ip mroute 239.194.248.10
IP Multicast Routing Table
Flags: D - Dense, S - Sparse, B - Bidir Group, s - SSM Group, C - Connected,
       L - Local, P - Pruned, R - RP-bit set, F - Register flag,
       T - SPT-bit set, J - Join SPT, M - MSDP created entry, E - Extranet,
       X - Proxy Join Timer Running, A - Candidate for MSDP Advertisement,
       U - URD, I - Received Source Specific Host Report,
       Z - Multicast Tunnel, z - MDT-data group sender,
       Y - Joined MDT-data group, y - Sending to MDT-data group
       V - RD & Vector, v - Vector
Outgoing interface flags: H - Hardware switched, A - Assert winner
Timers: Uptime/Expires
Interface state: Interface, Next-Hop or VCD, State/Mode
(*, 239.194.248.10), 00:05:38/00:00:21, RP 10.102.90.20, flags: SP
Incoming interface: Port-channel30, RPF nbr 10.102.78.13, RPF-MFD
Outgoing interface list: Null
This is seen on 8500 platform running 7.4.100.60
We have also WISMs running at 7.0.230.0, and there it can be seen that the entry refreshes every minute (like it should be)
IGMP(0): Received v2 Report on Vlan950 from 10.96.9.67 for 239.194.240.1
IGMP(0): Received Group record for group 239.194.240.1, mode 2 from 10.96.9.67 for 0 sources
IGMP(0): Updating EXCLUDE group timer for 239.194.240.1
IGMP(0): MRT Add/Update Vlan950 for (*,239.194.240.1) by 0
Shouldn't the controller at all times stay joined in its mobiility group ?

ok, some more debugging.
I loaded up 7.4.100.60 on a 5500 controller and got the same result.
NOTE: my global multicast settings are:
Controller->General: AP Multicast Mode: UNICAST
Controller->Multicast->Global Multicast is NOT enabled
Controller->Mobility->Multicast Messaging: enabled and group is 239.194.240.3
With this config, the IGMP entry is not retained, and i see on the controller the message (debug bcast all):
>>processEthernetIGMPpacket Received IGMP Pkt from DS when either igmp snooping or global multicast is disabled.
So, i then enabled Global Multicast (Controller->Multicast->Global Multicast to enable), and then the IGMP entry is refreshed:
bcastReceiveTask: Sep 05 13:11:17.734: IGMP packet received over vlanid = 102 from DS side
*bcastReceiveTask: Sep 05 13:11:17.734: received an IGMP query for multicast vlan = 102 address 0.0.0.0 intfnum = 3
*bcastReceiveTask: Sep 05 13:11:17.734: IGMP report scheduled for grp=0xefc2f003, vlan=102, intf=3, slot=70, maxRespTime=100
>>sh ip igmp membership 239.194.240.3
004586: Sep 5 15:11:50.710 CEST: IGMP(0): Send v2 general Query on Vlan101
Flags: A - aggregate, T - tracked
       L - Local, S - static, V - virtual, R - Reported through v3
       I - v3lite, U - Urd, M - SSM (S,G) channel
       1,2,3 - The version of IGMP, the group is in
Channel/Group-Flags:
       / - Filtering entry (Exclude mode (S,G), Include mode (G))
Reporter:
       - last reporter if group is not explicitly tracked
       /      - reporter in include mode, reporter in exclude
Channel/Group                  Reporter        Uptime   Exp. Flags Interface
*,239.194.240.3                10.102.180.218 00:38:51 02:28 2A     Vl102
Now, on the 5500 controller i can enable global multicast, while AP multicast mode is in UNICAST.
However, on the 8500 controller, running the same firmware (7.4.100.60), when i try to enable "Global Multicast", i get:
"Multicast-Unicast mode does not support IGMP/MLD snooping. Config mode to multicast-multicast first". I did not get this message on the 5500.
So when switching to Multicast->Multicast mode, and then enabled "Global Multicast", then it works.
This means that in order to have mobility messaging working on 8500 in multicast, you MUST put the AP Multicast Mode to Multicast AND you must enabled "Global Multicast", otherwise it won't work.

WLC 7.4.100.0 Mobility group control and data path down

Hi All,
Today i am facing issue with mobility group. i checked and found control and data path is down on foreign controller.I am able to ping anchor controller. Required ports are open on firewall but mping and eping fails. Any idea whats wrong. On Anchor controller, i have 7 foreign controller configured and among these 3 are working fine. Having problem with 4 foreign controller. Previously all are working fine and there is no changes made on network or firewall.

Post output of "show mobility summary" of your Anchor WLC & a non-working WLC. Also "show sysinfo" of those two controllers.
Regards
Rasika

Mobility group membership

I have 4 WLC's deployed :
1. AnchorWLC - WLC4402 anchor in a DMZ for guest access
2. WLCA1 - WLC4402 on SiteA
3. WLCB1 - WLC2006 on SiteB
4. WLCB2 - WLC2006 on SiteB
SiteA & SiteB are geographically separated.
On all WLC's there is the same mobility group 'group1' with the following group members:
1.on AnchorWLC: group1 members:WLCA1,WLCB1,WLCB2
2.on WLCA1: group1 members: anchorWLC
3.on WLCB1: group1 members: WLCB2,anchorWLC
4.on WLCB2: group1 members:WLCB1,anchorWLC
As SiteA and SiteB are geographically separated I have not included internal(non-anchor) WLC's that are on siteA in the mobility group created on WLC's on SiteB and vice versa . The only WLC that has all controllers added to his mobility group is the AnchorWLC as guest access is needed from both siteA and siteB.
Is this a valid config(anayway it is working...) or is it recommended to have 2 different mobility groups, one for each site(A & B) and create 2 seperate mobility groups on the anchorWLC ?

I would recommend going for two separate mobility groups. Even though it is working since it is geographically separated, its always better to have different mobility groups.

Mobility Group Member Down Status

The mobility group members from our guest controller have went into a down status twice since upgrading the 5508 WLC to software version 7.4.110. What can we do to remedy the problem?

1. First upgrade the WLC to 7.4.121.0 version (this is pretty stable).
2. paste the config and logs from WLC.
Regards
Dont forget to rate helpful posts

Mobility group between controller 4400 and virtual wlc

Hello everybody...
I read the configuration guide about the 7.3 release. And I figured out that you will need a hash key for establishing a mobility group relation between a controller and a virtual controller. The 7.3 release for the 5500 series works fine for me.
But the latest release 7.0.235.0 for the wireless lan controller series 4400 does not have a functionality to add a hash key while creating a new mobility group member.
The command "config mobility group member hash" is totally missing.
Does anybody have an idea how to establish a mobility group between a 4400 controller and a virtual then?
Best regards,
Sebastian Wieseler

The vWLC is out since yesterday.
We installed it in our lab and the deployment guide is out now, too.
Anyway... the hash is "god-given" in the vWLC. I can't change it to "none". So it is quite mandatory to enter a hash in the 4400 controller otherwise it just do not pair. So I am unable to establish a mobility group.
Any other ideas?

Mobility Group Requirements for Guest Anchor WLC

Hello -
I've alway assumed you can't create a guest tunnel between a local WLC and an anchor WLC that are in different mobility groups.   However, I was told recently (without much detail) that this is possible. So I have set out to test this.
I am trying to point one of my local WLCs guest SSIDs to a guest anchor WLC in a different mobility group.   I have a maintenance window coming up and I am looking to anchor the clients on one campus to the anchor WLC on the other campus so guest service does not go down.   Each campus is it's own mobility group.   In trying to set this up I went to the "mobility anchors" screen for the guest SSID on one of the local WLCs and I am unable to add the anchor WLC from the other campus because it's non in the drop-down menu. This is because it's not in the same mobility group.   So my question is how do I anchor clients coming through a local WLC in one mobility group to an anchor WLC in another mobility group?
To me it doesn't seem possible without significant configuration changes.   I don't want to reconfigure/recreate mobility groups.
Thanks
Chuck

Not only is it possible, I would recommend it. However, you may be confusing some concepts.
The Mobility Group is different than the Mobility Domain. I generally refer to the Mobility Group as those WLCs with the same Default Mobility Group Name, and the Mobility Domain as the entire Mobility List (where you can define up to 72 controllers from various mobility groups).
The point is that if WLCs 1-10 are GroupA, and WLCs 11-20 are GroupB, for anchoring to work you at least need to add the anchor to the mobility list of the foreign wlc, and vice versa.
If you notice, when you add a mobility entry to the list, it should ask you for mobility group. If you leave it blank, it should default to that of that WLC, but on GroupA controllers, you could define GroupB controllers (and specific GroupB) and then you should now have mobility established between your controllers and the Anchor configuration will have your anchors in the drop-down....
Does that make sense?

Mobility group same ssid multiple WLC

I have a 4400 and a 5508 WLC in the same location
We want to be able to roam between ap joined to both the 4400 and the 5508 using only one ssid
Do I only need to create a mobility group and add both WLC
then create only one WLAN on one of the controllers and it will be shared across bot WLC.
Or something else?

Resolution :
Yes you are correct. Please follow this link for Mobility groups and Roaming :
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/wireless/controller/7.2/configuration/guide/cg_mobility.html

Mobility Group

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for