Model layer customization are not reflecting on sandbox.

Hi
we are doing some changes to model layer in the seeded code, for the fusion apps.
But our changes are not reflecting on fusion apps instance, even those are small validation changes, and these changes are going fine on sandbox (xml file),
But when we are running the application these changes are not reflecting, do need to restart the server to get the model layer changes reflected.
Is there any way to debug our changes in the fusion apps instance.
Thanks
Vipin

But when we are running the application these changes are not reflecting, do need to restart the server to get the model layer changes reflected.
Is there any way to debug our changes in the fusion apps instance."
I am sure if you mean that it works after you restart the sever or you are asking if it will work on doing system restart.
In any case, model layer changes are always done at GLOBAL layer and these changes only reflect after restarting the application. So, server bounce is not needed but application restart is required for changes to be picked up.
Hope this helps
Thanks
Vik
http://blogs.oracle.com/fadevrel

Similar Messages

Changes made in LR 1.3 to psd files are not reflected in ACR 4.3, Bridge 2.1.1.9, or Photoshop CS3

I have repeatedly imported several psd images into LR 1.3, made changes in the develop mode, and saved metadata to file manually in addition to having the auto write metadata option on in LR and ACR. Any changes I have made in LR are not reflecting in Bridge previews or in ACR or Photoshop. I don't believe I should have to utilize the write to xmp options (even though I have been) since the files in question are psd and the metadata gets written directly into the file. If I delete the photo from LR, and even delete the LR catalog (new user trying to make it work with 1 photo at least before importing all images) and re-import the psd to LR it appears with the changes and can backlog in the history panel to it's original state upon import into LR. I would have to be in LR though to know that anything was altered as the other Adobe programs will not display the changes.
If anyone has any help - I would greatly appreciate it!
Thanks,
Ann
System=
160 GB hard drive
Intel core duo T7500
2 GB Ram
Windows Vista 32 bit
ACR 4.3
LR 1.3
Bridge 2.1.1.9
PS CS3 (updated last week)

I don't think the problem lies in the name. LR is after all meant to function as a data base of images and be a companion program to PS - with PS doing the heavy editing lifting. I do understand that PS is a pixel editing file and LR is not. I like the idea of the non-destructive editing that LR has to offer and for a lot of image "developing" I prefer LR's interface to ACR.
In my humble opinion, I just think that the Photoshop family of products should all be able to read the same metadata. If I am starting in LR with a psd file (with layers) and I continue to process the image further in LR and save the metadata - therefore saving the changes - I want to be able to open that same file (not another copy) in ACR, PS, or Bridge and have those changes reflected. The only way to do that currently is to export the file and when you do that you lose the PS layers and the LR history panel or another way around it is you can have edit copies of the same file. If at a later date you wanted to go back and change something, you can't just pull out a layer in PS or undo a history state in LR and with the multiple copies of essentially the same image you end us with any editing history scattered amongst multiple files. I already keep 2-4 (original, psd, jpeg print, jpeg web) files for one image which I think is more than adequate. Which is why I find the current set up so frustrating. For now I have just settled for exporting jpegs so I can see the changes.

R/3 numbers are not reflected in APO

HI
i transfered planned order from PPDS to R/3. it successfully CIFed as production order but R/3 production orders are not reflecting in APO. all integration models are in active status. what will be the reason

Hi Thennarasu,
One or more of the input products(components) have special procurement key set in R/3 material master for withdrawal from another plant.
Planned orders are changed in SAP APO and then the conversion indicator is set to initiate conversion into a manufacturing order.
But the queue from SAP APO to SAP R/3 hangs with an error message that indicates that the material in question is not maintained in the certain storage location of a specified plant.
As a result, the planned order is not converted.
Check to maintain the storage locations in customising - Enterprise Structure->Definition->Materials Management->Maintain Storage locations. Here maintain the storage locations of the Plant from which you are procuring the components under the Plant which requires them.
Please confirm
Regards
R. Senthil Mareeswaran.

In Journalization updates are not reflecting in target

Hi,
I am using Simple Journalization for SQL Server tables. Only the newly added rows are reflecting in the target but not the updated ones. I have inserted two rows and updated one row in source. Only the inserted records are reflecting in target and updated record is not reflecting in target.
When I check the intermediate(I$_CDC_TARGET) and JKM tables(J$CDC_SOURCE) both inserted and updated rows are there. Why this updated records are not reflecting in target?
Both Source and Target tables have Primary keys.
Thanks,
Naveen Suram

Hi,
I am using IKM SQL Incremental Update (row by row). Updated are coming to I$ table and I am able to see these records in Journal data also.
One doubt here: In my source no extra columns are coming...I refered JohnGoodwin blog...according to the blog...there should be some extra columns related to journal right? Why they are not coming?
First I have added the JKM to my model..then added the data source to CDC...then created a sunscriber...then started a Journal....
Any thing I am missing?
Thanks,
Naveen Suram

Changes are not reflecting in the Quality

Hi,
These are standard SAP Components. I have imported the ESS and MSS Packages.
Actually 3 Development Components are using in my application (Tra,TraTri and TraTre).Tra is the root DC.
I have made changes to those objects and sucecessfully build without errors.
After check-in all activities those activities are working fine in Development system.
But those changes not refclecting in Quality system. So i was founded build log error in Consolidation.
I was fixed the error in the Development system and build the components without build error.
still now changes are not reflecting in the quality system.
But out of 3 DCs(Tra,TraTri,TraTre) Tra and TraTre are working fine in Quality(changes are reflecting) only problem in TraTri DC (changes are not reflecting in the Quality)..
Please help me as soon as possible....Its very help full for me
Regards
Sudhakar Reddy A

Hi Slava,
very very thanks to you for the fast reply. but one thing in my side.
When i release the activities after successful build, i export those changes and place them in the import queue of the consolidation system in the CMS.
The export in the SAP NetWeaver Developer Studio packs all selected activities into a change request, and then places them in the import queue of the consolidation system.
When the my system administrator imports this request into the consolidation system, the released changes are integrated into the DTR workspace of the consolidation system; the build server compiles the modified components.
my system administrator findout build error in consolidation system:
[wdgen] [Error]   .PersonnelNumberCheck: The mapping definition is inconsistent, the mapped context element does not exist.
     [wdgen] [Error]   com.sap.xss.tra.tri.vc.changepersno.VcTriChangePersNo --> ContextModelNode PersonnelNumberCheck [modelClass]: The context model node has not been bound to a model class (Hint: A Context model node has to be bound to a model class or mapped to a model node of another controller.)
     [wdgen] [Error]   .PersonnelNumberCheck.I_Employeenumber: The mapping definition is inconsistent, the mapped context element does not exist.
     [wdgen] [Error]   .PersonnelNumberCheck.PersonnelNumberCheck_Output: The mapping definition is inconsistent, the mapped context element does not exist.
     [wdgen] [Error]   com.sap.xss.tra.tri.vc.changepersno.VcTriChangePersNo --> ContextModelNode PersonnelNumberCheck_Output [modelClass]: The context model node has not been bound to a model class (Hint: A Context model node has to be bound to a model class or mapped to a model node of another controller.)
     [wdgen] [Info]    com.sap.xss.tra.tri.vc.changepersno.VcTriChangePersNo --> ContextModelNode PersonnelNumberCheck_Output [supplyingRelationRole]: Supply function or supplying relation role missing (Hint: A child node which is not mapped must have either a supplying relation role or a supply function or one of its parent nodes must have a supply function.)
     [wdgen] [Error]   .PersonnelNumberCheck.PersonnelNumberCheck_Output.E_Name: The mapping definition is inconsistent, the mapped context element does not exist.
     [wdgen] [Error]   .PersonnelNumberCheck.PersonnelNumberCheck_Output.PersonnelNumberCheck_Et_Return: The mapping definition is inconsistent, the mapped context element does not exist.
     [wdgen] [Error]   com.sap.xss.tra.tri.vc.changepersno.VcTriChangePersNo --> ContextModelNode PersonnelNumberCheck_Et_Return [modelClass]: The context model node has not been bound to a model class (Hint: A Context model node has to be bound to a model class or mapped to a model node of another controller.)
     [wdgen] [Info]    com.sap.xss.tra.tri.vc.changepersno.VcTriChangePersNo --> ContextModelNode PersonnelNumberCheck_Et_Return [supplyingRelationRole]: Supply function or supplying relation role missing (Hint: A child node which is not mapped must have either a supplying relation role or a supply function or one of its parent nodes must have a supply function.)
     [wdgen] [Error]   .PersonnelNumberCheck.PersonnelNumberCheck_Output.PersonnelNumberCheck_Et_Return.Type: The mapping definition is inconsistent, the mapped context element does not exist.
     [wdgen] [Error]   .PersonnelNumberCheck.PersonnelNumberCheck_Output.PersonnelNumberCheck_Et_Return.Message: The mapping definition is inconsistent, the mapped context element does not exist.
     [wdgen] [Error]   .PersonnelNumberCheck.PersonnelNumberCheck_Output.PersonnelNumberCheck_Et_Return.Log_No: The mapping definition is inconsistent, the mapped context element does not exist.
     [wdgen] [Error]   .PersonnelNumberCheck.PersonnelNumberCheck_Output.PersonnelNumberCheck_Et_Return.Field: The mapping definition is inconsistent, the mapped context element does not exist.
     [wdgen] [Error]   .PersonnelNumberCheck.PersonnelNumberCheck_Output.PersonnelNumberCheck_Et_Return.System: The mapping definition is inconsistent, the mapped context element does not exist.
     [wdgen] [Error]   .PersonnelNumberCheck.PersonnelNumberCheck_Output.PersonnelNumberCheck_Et_Return.Message_V1: The mapping definition is inconsistent, the mapped context element does not exist.
     [wdgen] [Error]   .PersonnelNumberCheck.PersonnelNumberCheck_Output.PersonnelNumberCheck_Et_Return.Message_V3: The mapping definition is inconsistent, the mapped context element does not exist.
     [wdgen] [Error]   .PersonnelNumberCheck.PersonnelNumberCheck_Output.PersonnelNumberCheck_Et_Return.Message_V2: The mapping definition is inconsistent, the mapped context element does not exist.
     [wdgen] [Error]   .PersonnelNumberCheck.PersonnelNumberCheck_Output.PersonnelNumberCheck_Et_Return.Log_Msg_No: The mapping definition is inconsistent, the mapped context element does not exist.
     [wdgen] [Error]   .PersonnelNumberCheck.PersonnelNumberCheck_Output.PersonnelNumberCheck_Et_Return.Number: The mapping definition is inconsistent, the mapped context element does not exist.
     [wdgen] [Error]   .PersonnelNumberCheck.PersonnelNumberCheck_Output.PersonnelNumberCheck_Et_Return.Message_V4: The mapping definition is inconsistent, the mapped context element does not exist.
     [wdgen] [Error]   .PersonnelNumberCheck.PersonnelNumberCheck_Output.PersonnelNumberCheck_Et_Return.Parameter: The mapping definition is inconsistent, the mapped context element does not exist.
     [wdgen] [Error]   .PersonnelNumberCheck.PersonnelNumberCheck_Output.PersonnelNumberCheck_Et_Return.Id: The mapping definition is inconsistent, the mapped context element does not exist.
     [wdgen] [Error]   .PersonnelNumberCheck.PersonnelNumberCheck_Output.PersonnelNumberCheck_Et_Return.Row: The mapping definition is inconsistent, the mapped context element does not exist.
     [wdgen] [Error]   com.sap.xss.tra.tri.vc.changepersno.VcTriChangePersNo --> ContextValueAttribute EmployeeName [readOnly]: The context attribute has to be read-only. (Hint: As the mapped context attribute is read-only this attribute has to be read-only, too.)
I was fix error in my development system with out any build errors. still now not working ...pls give me any suggestion.i dont have access to consolidation system.
Regards,
Sudhakar

Changes made in BOM are not reflected in Configurator.

Hi all,
When i update minimum and maximum quantities in BOM, the new values are not reflected in the configurator.
I have found a patch (patch# 4410573) for this issue in metalink and applying that patch did not resolve the issue.
I have logged an SR with Oracle for this and Oracle support have asked me to run "Refresh Single Configuration Model" concurrent program and see if the changes are reflected.
This program has 2 parameters one for folder and the other for Configuration Model Id.
When i try to run the program, for any of the folders, the value set for the parameter Configuration Model Id does not show any values and hence i am unable to run the program.
We don't have a separate instance for COnfigurator.
Do i need to do any set up so that my Configuration model is reflected in the LOV?
Can anyone please help me on this?
Oracle Apps version: 11.5.10.2
Configuration software build: 11.5.10.25.43A
Regards,
Sreekanth

Hi Jason,
Please see my comments below
Jason said*
Support is correct. If you haven't run the Refresh a Single Configuration Model concurrent program for your model, then the new BOM attributes will not be visible in your model. Changes to items/BOMs are not directly reflected in the configuration model. You must "refresh" the model to see the changes.*
Even without running the "Refresh a Single Configuration Model" concurrent program, in some scenarios, changes are being reflected in Configurator.
Ex:
When i change only minimum and maximum quantities, the changes i.e. new minimum and maximum values are not reflected in Configurator.
But, when i also change any of the following fields along with minimum and maximum quantities, new values are being updated in Configurator with out running the refresh program.
effectivity_date, disable_date, component_quantity, planning_factor, component_yield_factor and optional class
Can you please explain this?
Also, i have already tried executing the query by commenting the enclosing_folder check. But still, the query is not retrieving any records.
Basically, the sub-query that fetches devl_project_id itself is not retrieving any records.
Jason said:+
Based on the SQL above, the only criteria for importing a model is that the item under the folder must be:+
a. A Model (PRJ = Project)+
b. The Model cannot be deleted (Deleted_flag must be '0')+
c. And the model must have been imported from Oracle apps, e.g. it cannot be a non-BOM model (orig_sys_ref is not null)+
Can you please tell how can i check whether model is imported into configurator or not and if it is imported from where is it imported?
Regards,
Sreekanth
Edited by: Sreekanth Munagala on May 12, 2011 8:52 AM

2LIS_02_ITM deleted line items are not reflected in BW

Hi,
Our current Data flow 2LIS_02_ITM-->DSO-->CUBE.
I am analyzing a Invoice, When it is created 01.04.2014 it has got 10 Line Items and all the data is load to BW,Invoice with 10 Line items.
In ECC I can now see the same Invoice only got 5 line items and from change log I can see 5 line items are deleted on 15.04.2014.These changes are not reflected in BW.In BW invoice data still shows 10 line items.
If I perform setup table job and ECC RSA3 for that invoice I am getting only 5.
I believe it’s something to do with 0RECORDMODE,Can you please let me know how to fix this in BW.
Thanks

Yes this is a known behavior in case of deltas.
For Deleted line items Rocancel field will have an entry with R.
To handle this you need to map ROCANCEL field in Technical group of transformation (Between Datasource to DSO) with 0Recordmode.
Once you will do that then after activating the data in DSO it will nullify the records and deleted order or item will not appear.
Regards,
AL

Updated (VORowImpl ) values are not reflected in inline POPUP table

Hi Expert,
Currently i am getting exception when i try to update my iterator binding,
Here is my use case,
I have view object displayed inside the inline popup as a table. When i modify one of the cell i am firing the value change listener and it is called the ViewObjectRowImpl class method. Inside the method i do some computation (i am executing some DB query to get back some value). After the query execution i am updating the other columns data based on the changes.
First i have PPR the table and check out the update values. Unfortunately the change values are not reflected.
Then i used the following code
DCIteratorBinding itrBinding = findIteratorBinding("EmployeeVO1Iterator");
if (itrBinding != null) {
itrBinding.executeQuery();
itrBinding.refresh(DCIteratorBinding.RANGESIZE_UNLIMITED);
Now i am getting the " JBO-25003: Object EmployeeMgmtAM of type ApplicationModule is not found."
May i know what went wrong? Am i missing anything. May i know how can i refresh the UI table based on the updated VORowImpl. Looking forward hints.
Thanks

Thanks Frank, Actually i am accessing the client method as follows,
DCIteratorBinding itrBinding = findIteratorBinding("EmployeeVO1Iterator");
if (itrBinding != null) {
EmployeeVORowImpl employeeVO = (EmployeeVORowImpl)itrBinding.getCurrentRow();
empoyeeVO.methodName();
May i know what is the different between accessing the method as shown above and access via the MethodBinding?
How about access the attribute of the View object using the above approach? i.e empoyeeVO.getName() like ....
Also i have configure the ADF looger to finest level and found the primary reason to "Applicaiton module not found" was some entity validation. But this not always happened. Same test case works fine and fails sometimes. I am clueless. Could you please throw some light.
Thanks
Edited by: user1022639 on Feb 7, 2012 5:24 PM

Changes are not reflected in Script output

Hi All,
i am facing a problem in SAPscript.
I have made a Zscript by copying standard script F110_FR_CHEQUE. I have made the changes in the script as per requirement in development client and transported it to testing client to test (As i dont have any data in development client). But, surprisingly, when i run the program and check the output, the changes are not reflected in the script output.
First i thought that my script was not triggered thats whay i m not getting any change, but later i changed the dimension of one of the window, in which some hard coded text is written, the differece i found was that, window size is changed, but the text written in that window is still same (what was in standard script.) .
I am using standard texts for hard coding in script. Standard texts have been transported in testing client also.
please help me in this regard.

Hi,
Could you plese Check NACE whether your script is confiugring or not.
If it is configured well then Check Standard Text is available or not in Test client by open it in SO10.
Check all the paragrah formats applied to Standard text are transferred to Test client which are in SE72.
IF it is available in SO10 then debug the print program for that windows any standard conditions are calling to print the text.

Changes are not reflecting in the discoverer workbook

Hi ,
I have a report created with user Disco(Disco.Report_name).Now I need to add a column to it and i have done that with other user Discodev but when I save it the changes are not reflected on Disco(Disco.Report_name) rather it is being saved with user Discodev(*Discodev.Report_name*) .
The User wants that the changes should be reflected on Disco.Report_name (I can't use the credentials of Disco to do this as it is also a user) .
Appreciate your help !!
Discoverer Version 4i
Thanks ,
Vijay

Hi West,
Thanks for the reply.
I want to get clarified one thing, Is there any option where DISCO user can give Privileges to DISCODEV to make the changes,as the DISCO user is not a common user I have a problem in making the changes.
Thanks,
Vijay

Changes are not Reflecting in WAD

Dear Gurus,
I got a problem in WAD. Changes are not Reflecting in My WAD. When i created NewQuery in WAD by just placing Chart & Saved it. After executing Chart is displaced.Again I updated the same query by placing table and saved it. After Executing Table is not displayed only previously saved Chart is displayed. Could any one Kindly solve my Problem.
Thanks,
Sony

Hi Sony,
SAP BI has HTTP Cache and the web templates are stored in the HTTP cache of the server. So, when you change a template and execute it again - the previous version which is stored in the HTTP cache is being retreived.
To correct this, go to TCODE SMICM in the menu bar >> Goto >> HTTP Server Cache >> Invalidate -> Global in system
Once this is done, ask basis to restart the java engine.
I hope this helps you.!
-Pradnya
Edited by: Pradnya Rane on Sep 29, 2009 8:05 AM

LPA changes are not reflected fully in 2LIS_02_SCL

The changes done to scheduling agreement, schedule lines are not reflecting in 2LIS_02_SCL, and there by resulting errors in delta update in BI system.
For example
     LPA     RM     SCL     Quantity                                    (2LIS_02_SCL)
ODS(A)      3001             15          800
ODS(C)     3001     X     15          300
     3001          15          800
PSA      3001     X     15          400
        3001             15          900
As we are using the Update type Addition,
From PSA, it is clear that the change is 500; this change got reflected in ODS properly.
But when I compare ODS data with EKET data,
LPA     SCL     ODS(Active)          EKET
3001     15     800               900
As you can see wrong validation results between BI & R3
I am missing the below changes happened to SCL in the extractor
     3001     X     15          300
     3001          15          400
The missing above entry is resulting errors.
Does anybody know how the EKET line changes can be tracked?
How to check the V3 Update, we checked the program: RMBWV302
Does anybody have idea where to track this error.
Note: the above case is happening to only a for few documents
Regards,
NK.A
Message was edited by:
        nandakumar a

Hi Renjith,
Thanks for the reply. Can you please let me know few more answers to the below points.
As the datasource 2LIS_02_SCL does not takes this event into account (only MA, MB, MC and MD), this field is not passed to BW (you can see the events per datasource in transaction LBWE)
You are referring to posting of the Material Ledger posting right ? Can you please give some more information about MA MB MC MD as I have verified in LBWE and could not find anything about it except that its picking that GLMNG value from MCEKET table.
Renjith, Please update your views on the below query. I am not able to get any answers from anyone on this query. I appreciate your reply.
In my opinion you would be able to fill it in the customer-exit of LIS (EXIT_SAPLEINS_001) or BW (EXIT_SAPLRSAP_001)
If I add a zfield to the SCL DS and then populate that field with the code in the include ZXRSAU01 , EXIT_SAPLRSAP_001 in that going to help.
Do I have to verify the events MA MB MC and MD while populating this zfield or I can just do a direct lookup on EKET
select single * from EKET
where EBELN = l_MC02M_0SCL-EBELN
and EBELP = l_MC02M_0SCL-EBELP
and ETENR = l_MC02M_0SCL-ETENR will do ?
So when ever the ds fields are getting populated in the org DS ...it will find this zfield in the same structure and will fill this field. Is that going to fix it ? I have also found couple of SAP Notes on the same issue and do you think implementing those notes will fix the problem without the zfield or code.
Could you please check out these notes 100690 and 431145. Please suggest.
Thanks,
Daniel

SAP BI CKF,RKF descrptions are not reflecting in the universe

Dear Gurus,
I have couple of questions
1.I have created a BI quey with 2 calculated keyfigures and 2 Restricted keyfigures. When i am creating a universe on top of the BI query, Desrptions for Calculated and Restricted keyfigures are not reflecting in the universe, Rather the universe is showing UID(unique ID)'s of the CKF and RKF.
To get the descriptions into the universe, Do i need to do any settings?
2. In one of the documents I have read that we have to create one universe for one language if i want to see the report in Multiple languages. if it is so,
Do i need to create universe in each and every language or is there any option that i can create the universe in one language and replicate into the required languages?
Please help.
Thanks and Regards
Jagadeesh Ambati

Hello Jagadeesh,
I recommend to post this query to the [Integration Kits - SAP|BusinessObjects Integration Kits; forum.
This forum is dedicated to topics related to the BusinessObjects Integration Kit for SAP.
It is monitored by qualified technicians and you will get a faster response there.
Also, all SAP Kit queries remain in one place and thus can be easily searched in one place.
Thanks a lot,
Falk

Changes are not reflecting while executing the SAP script from report

HI,
In SAP-script we are nmaking changes in form in client 130
it is showing the changes in 140 client but while excuting the report the same are not reflecting in the output.
Thanks in Advance
Naveen M

Hello.
Scripts are mandant depentant. So you must copy from 130 to 140 for changes take efect.
Do it in transaction SE71 in mandant 140, first screen, in the menu options.
And never forget to activate it in all mandants.
Best regards.
Valter Oliveira.

Changes in Crystal reports are not reflecting after publishing

Dear SDN Mates,
We are facing problem with Crystal reports. After making the changes in the crystal reports, it is not reflecting in the portal after publishing. Still it is showing the older version of the report.
Can anyone please help me on this.
Thanks and Regards
Arun S

Hello Prathamesh,
After publishing the report, we require some changes in the report and doing some modifications in crystal report and again we are publishing this report. After publishing the report for second time, those changes are not reflecting in the BOE portal.
This is happening for all reports. Can you please suggest me on this.
Thanks and regards
Arun S

Model layer customization are not reflecting on sandbox.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for