Model SB0220 not listed. Which driver should I u

For some reason the model number on my card is not in the list given on the creative support pages to identify the correct software/firmware to download.
Can anyone help?
Thanks.

i can answer this one
model sb0220 sound blaster li've is not supported by creative becouse it's a oem sound card
you can only use the drivers provided on the cd and as an alternati've kx project drivers.(I have one sb0220 too and did a lot of googling for drivers)

Similar Messages

I recently purchased Elements 13 for Mac-OS and cannot download N-OS and cannot download NEF-RAW files taken on my Nikon D5500. The model is not listed among those supported by Elements, but the D5300 is, which is nearly identical. Is there any quick fix?

I recently purchased Elements 13 for Mac-OS and cannot download N-OS and cannot download NEF-RAW files taken on my Nikon D5500. The model is not listed among those supported by Elements, but the D5300 is, which is nearly identical. Is there any quick fix?

What is N-OS?
For the camera raw problem, every new camera has its own raw format and ACR must be updated to include it. That hasn't happened yet for the D5500, so you'll just have to use the Nikon software till Adobe gets the info and releases an updated version of ACR. It's not unusual to be in your situation if you buy a camera model that's only been out a month. You just have to wait a bit.

HT3669 which driver should i use for the epson LX300 matrix-dot printer??

which driver should i use for the epson LX300 matrix-dot printer??? I dowloaded all drivers for epson but i didn't find the driver for the LX300.
I bought an i mac not so long ago, can anyone help me about this?

i use parallels desktop 7 because i use a program for work with windows XP. Is there really no solution?

HELP - which driver should I use?

Hi,
          We are developing an application using WebLogic 6.0 in conjunction with
          TOPLink 2.5.1 for object/relational mapping (manages the persistence
          layer). We would like to configure our application to use WebLogic's
          connection pools and I would have a few questions regarding the driver I
          should use.
          Here's a short description of our application:
          Our service layer is entirely composed of container managed stateless
          session beans. On the TOPLink side, the transactions are manipulated by
          a UnitOfWork object, which gives the control over the distributed
          transaction to an external transaction controller. Our WebLogic external
          transaction controller uses the UserTransaction interface to manipulate
          a transaction (begin/commit/rollback). So, within an EJB method
          execution we might have several units of work begin and 'commit'
          transactions, but the overall transaction is really committed only at
          the method exit, by the external transaction controller.
          This works, without using connection pools. The problem is, if we don't
          use connection pools for every SQL executed, a new connection is created
          and authenticated against the Oracle Server, which is terrible for
          performance. However, when I tried to configure a WebLogic connection
          pool, it doesn't work anymore (by using the non-XA OCI driver the
          connections from the pool were used, but never released back to the pool
          after the transaction was being committed).
          My questions are:
          1. Given that our transactions are manipulated through JETS, is it
          correct to use the JTS Oracle driver, which comes with the WL6.0
          installation?
          Driver Classname: weblogic.jdbc.jts.Driver
          URL: jdbc:weblogic:jts:myOracleInstance
          2. If we should use the JTS Oracle driver, should I specify the pool
          name in the Oracle URL?
          3. What is the difference between jdbc20 and jdbc? Is the first one
          deprecated?
          Thank you,
          Brenda.
          [att1.html]


Hi Sriram,
          Thank you very much for your help.
          I used the datasource configuration as you suggested and it almost
          works. It is noticeable faster than before,
          but the problem now is that I am getting the following exception when
          loading the sixth object into the database.
          I do not understand why it is the sixth object, because I created the
          Oracle connection pool with a maximum of
          10 connections.
          Here's the exception I get:
          Creating user numbers: from 2461 to 2500
          Create User testuser2461
          Create User testuser2462
          Create User testuser2463
          Create User testuser2464
          Create User testuser2465
          Create User testuser2466
          Caught unexpected exception. Reason:
          weblogic.transaction.internal.AppSetRollbackOnlyException
          at
          weblogic.transaction.internal.TransactionImpl.setRollbackOnly(TransactionImpl.java:403)
          at
          weblogic.transaction.internal.TransactionManagerImpl.setRollbackOnly(TransactionManagerImpl.java:242)
          at
          weblogic.transaction.internal.TransactionManagerImpl.setRollbackOnly(TransactionManagerImpl.java:236)
          at
          TOPLink.Public.JTS.WebLogic.WebLogicJTSSynchronization.rollbackGlobalTransaction(WebLogicJTSSynchronization.java:140)
          at
          TOPLink.Public.JTS.AbstractSynchronizationListener.beforeCompletion(AbstractSynchronizationListener.java)
          at
          weblogic.transaction.internal.ServerSCInfo.callBeforeCompletions(ServerSCInfo.java:500)
          at
          weblogic.transaction.internal.ServerSCInfo.startPrePrepareAndChain(ServerSCInfo.java:70)
          at
          weblogic.transaction.internal.ServerTransactionImpl.localPrePrepareAndChain(ServerTransactionImpl.java:877)
          at
          weblogic.transaction.internal.ServerTransactionImpl.globalPrePrepare(ServerTransactionImpl.java:1203)
          at
          weblogic.transaction.internal.ServerTransactionImpl.commit(ServerTransactionImpl.java:158)
          at
          weblogic.ejb20.internal.BaseEJBObject.postInvoke(BaseEJBObject.java:203)
          at
          com.imoney.service.userManagement.UserServiceBeanEOImpl.createUser(UserServiceBeanEOImpl.java:478)
          at
          com.imoney.service.userManagement.UserServiceBeanEOImpl_WLSkel.invoke(UserServiceBeanEOImpl_WLSkel.java:114)
          at
          weblogic.rmi.internal.BasicServerAdapter.invoke(BasicServerAdapter.java:373)
          at
          weblogic.rmi.cluster.ReplicaAwareServerRef.invoke(ReplicaAwareServerRef.java:128)
          at
          weblogic.rmi.internal.BasicServerAdapter.invoke(BasicServerAdapter.java:237)
          at
          weblogic.rmi.internal.BasicRequestHandler.handleRequest(BasicRequestHandler.java:103)
          at
          weblogic.rmi.internal.BasicExecuteRequest.execute(BasicExecuteRequest.java:17)
          at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.execute(ExecuteThread.java:137)
          at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:120)
          --------------- nested within: ------------------
          weblogic.transaction.RollbackException: Unknown reason - with nested
          exception:
          [weblogic.transaction.internal.AppSetRollbackOnlyException]
          at
          weblogic.transaction.internal.TransactionImpl.throwRollbackException(TransactionImpl.java:1248)
          at
          weblogic.transaction.internal.ServerTransactionImpl.commit(ServerTransactionImpl.java:208)
          at
          weblogic.ejb20.internal.BaseEJBObject.postInvoke(BaseEJBObject.java:203)
          at
          com.imoney.service.userManagement.UserServiceBeanEOImpl.createUser(UserServiceBeanEOImpl.java:478)
          at
          com.imoney.service.userManagement.UserServiceBeanEOImpl_WLSkel.invoke(UserServiceBeanEOImpl_WLSkel.java:114)
          at
          weblogic.rmi.internal.BasicServerAdapter.invoke(BasicServerAdapter.java:373)
          at
          weblogic.rmi.cluster.ReplicaAwareServerRef.invoke(ReplicaAwareServerRef.java:128)
          at
          weblogic.rmi.internal.BasicServerAdapter.invoke(BasicServerAdapter.java:237)
          at
          weblogic.rmi.internal.BasicRequestHandler.handleRequest(BasicRequestHandler.java:103)
          at
          weblogic.rmi.internal.BasicExecuteRequest.execute(BasicExecuteRequest.java:17)
          at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.execute(ExecuteThread.java:137)
          at weblogic.kernel.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:120)
          >> This works, without using connection pools. The problem is, if we
          >> don't use connection pools for every SQL executed, a new connection
          >> is created and authenticated against the Oracle Server, which is
          >> terrible for performance. However, when I tried to configure a
          >> WebLogic connection pool, it doesn't work anymore (by using the
          >> non-XA OCI driver the connections from the pool were used, but never
          >> released back to the pool after the transaction was being
          >> committed).
          >>
          >> My questions are:
          >>
          >> 1. Given that our transactions are manipulated through JETS, is it
          >> correct to use the JTS Oracle driver, which comes with the WL6.0
          >> installation?
          >> Driver Classname: weblogic.jdbc.jts.Driver
          >> URL: jdbc:weblogic:jts:myOracleInstance
          >>
          >
          > Don't use the weblogic.jdbc.jts.Driver. The java.sql.Driver interface
          > is getting deprecated in favor of the DataSource interface.
          > Instead, configure the pool and a datasource to "wrap" the pool, as
          > follows:
          > <JDBCConnectionPool
          > Name="testPool"
          > Targets="myserver,server1"
          > URL="jdbc:weblogic:oracle:foo" 
          > DriverName="weblogic.jdbc.oci.Driver"
          > InitialCapacity="1"
          > MaxCapacity="10"
          > CapacityIncrement="1"
          > Properties="user=scott;password=tiger;server=foo"
          > />
          >
          > <JDBCDataSource
          > Name="poolDS" 
          > Targets="myserver,server1" 
          > JNDIName="moneyDS" 
          > PoolName="testPool" 
          > />
          >
          >
          > At run-time, instead of doing DriverManager.getConnection(), call
          > jndiContext.lookup("moneyDS") to get a DataSource object. Call
          > getConnection() on it.
          >
          > This is faster and much more thread-savvy than the DriverManager code.
          [att1.html]

Which driver should I use for Oracle RAC .....

We are using Weblogic 8.1 sp2 and Oracle RAC (9.x). Which driver , I should
use : i.e.
type 2 Orcle thin driver
or
type 2 Oracle OCI driver
or
type 4 oracle thin driver
or
Jdrivers
or other which is best for this configuration .
Sanjeev

Thanks. I was unaware of that forum.
Joe
Galen Boyer wrote:
On Tue, 06 Jul 2004, [email protected] wrote:
Galen Boyer wrote:
Joe, I have always suggested that people use the OCI driver
unless it won't suffice based on distribution requirements.
How come you choose the thin driver? Oracle will generally
fix the OCI driver before the thin and the OCI driver will
give far superior performance when dealing with LOBs.We have actually had faster response getting thin driver fixes
than OCI-based fixes. Thats interesting. I'll take note of it.
The 10g driver works with RAC, is much faster than previous
drivers, and is easier to install etc. OCI users are often
hopeful about TAF, which is broken and less-than-useless for
active complicated JDBC applications. OCI problems can bring
down the whole JVM and are harder to debug.
These are from reading the results and recommendations of
Oracle Corporation, Tom Kyte and other Oracle professionals.
Have you research to say different? I'd like to see it,
because up until now, I've always suggested OCI first unless
the client doesn't have an oracle client installation
available.Tom does an excellent job from the DBMS perspective, but I
don't see him often in the jdbc arena.His Q&A site is littered with jdbc examples. He also will call
on people in specific expertise to help him answer questions.
Here an example of that where he show the OCI driver to be much
more performant.
http://asktom.oracle.com/pls/ask/f?p=4950:8:9561536906412728184::NO::F4950_P8_DISPLAYID,F4950_P8_CRITERIA:1004630777647,

I have a problem regarding partitioning my hard drive. Which drive should I change into logical?

My 500 gb harddrive of Hp Pavilion G6 notebook has 4 primary partitions already. First - system (199 MB), Second - C: (450 gb), Third D: Recovery (14.97 gb) and Fourth Hp_tools (103.02 mb). I want to divide my C: drive into 3 partitions 150 gb each. I'm using MiniTool Partition Wizard software. It doesn't allow me to create further partitions because I have already four primary partitions. So, I have to change one to logical partition. Which one should I change?

Hi,
There is an excellent guide by Daniel_Potyrala on this subject Here.
Regards,
DP-K
****Click the White thumb to say thanks****
****Please mark Accept As Solution if it solves your problem****
****I don't work for HP****
Microsoft MVP - Windows Experience

Vaio model number not listed on Window10 information

My Vaio SVS13AB1GW is not listed on http://www.sony-asia.com/microsite/support/win10/en/index.html. When I went to https://www.sony-asia.com/section/contactus to ask about the compatability of my computer to use Window10 the submitted page just says 'Sorry your page was binned'. (Many times) Would someone from Sony please tell me why my Model number is not listed, if it will be in future, or if there is a similar model number that I can refer to instead. I am looking forward to upgrading to Window10 in due course but I need to know when Sony has sorted out all of the kinks for my particular model. Thanks.

Hi skiwiscott,
Thank you for considering Sony Community!
We appreciate your time posting your issue however, your Vaio SVS13AB1GW is not being recognized by our system and probably not a U.S. model. This is actually the U.S. Sony Community page. There is a possibility that the SVS13AB1GW is the chassis number and not the complete model name. You may use Vaio Care (Desktop) application -> About your Vaio to check for the complete details. Another way is to press Assist button while the unit is off (Vaio Care Rescue Mode), accessing recovery partition. Lastly, by going to BIOS setup.
You may also contact Sony's support based on your location or from where you purchased the computer.
For further assistance regarding your concern, please contact the Sony offices/Sony representative offices nearest to your place of residence in Asia Pacific region http://www.sony-asia.com/countryselector.html?hpid=countryselector:AsiaPacific. Due to proximity, they are in a better position to respond to your questions or concerns.
Regards,
Vincent
If my post answers your question, please mark it as "Accept as Solution"

Which drive should I buy for iMovie? I only have 1 FW 400 and 1 USB2 port.

I have a 12" 1ghz AiBook and am getting into some iMovie editing, but I need a new hard drive for extra storage, and I need help figuring out what'll work.
Despite having maxed out the drive config (it's a 80 GB 4200 RPM drive, with about 11 GB of free space) there isn't enough to hold a full MiniDV tape's worth of clips, let alone to edit together a decent little project.
So I'm left with the following options:
* Upgrade the internal drive
* Buy an external FW drive
* Buy an external USB2 drive
The first option is obviously ideal, performance-wise, since I can get a speedy 7200 RPM ATA drive, but it's also very expensive, ~$150 for a decent drive, and my battery life will go to heck (moreso), and the install on the 12" is a PITA. So I'd like to avoid that.
For an external drive, I already have a USB2/FW enclosure with an old HD in it, so I'm considering putting a 7200 RPM drive in there and see if that'll work.
So my question is: Will it? Can I capture video to the drive in either USB2 or FW mode? Keep in mind that if I use it as FW, I'll have it on the same bus as the camera, so it'll be splitting bandwidth (or something). USB2 of course has its own problems...
What's the best way to go here? Should I just suck it up and upgrade the internal drive, or is a decent USB2 drive sufficient for capturing DV (not high-def) from iMovie? (After capture, I could always re-connect the drive via FW to keep throughput higher for DVD burning.)
Just looking for advice before I plunk down my hard earned cash.
Thanks in advance!
AiBook G4 12 1ghz Mac OS X (10.4)

I've never had any dropouts running any Sony camcorder "daisy-chained" through an external FireWire drive as long as the external drive has a 5400rpm or faster disc in it.
That's been true for G3 and G4 laptops, a Mac mini ..well; for all the Macs listed below (in small print).
But be aware - as Karsten says - that many Canon camcorders just won't do that: they won't work properly if any other FireWire device is connected to your Mac besides the camcorder ..so they will not work "daisy-chained" through an external disc ..see Karsten's suggestion about importing to the internal disc, then moving all that video to the external disc for editing. However, if you have next to no space on your internal disc, you'll need some other strategy, or to simply MAKE some space there.
I've upgraded alumin(i)um PowerBooks (12" and 17") to 120GB fast internal discs, and that doesn't seem to have diminished their running-time on battery power. But it's a finicky job with a 12" PB ..especially getting the F1 keytop to re-seat properly afterwards!
So if you don't have a Canon camcorder, it's probably best to get a fast external FireWire drive and capture and edit on that. If you DO have a Canon camcorder, it may be better to upgrade your internal disc, but you'll need concentration, steady hands, patience, and persistence (..trying to get that F1 keytop back on again!)

On which drive should I put samples? Is EXS, Ultrabeat, etc. streamed/ram?

Hey, i am setting up the new iteration of my home studio. I upgraded to 7 Pro recently and am taking advantage of the new 500GB internal hard drive. My question is, should I relocate (via alias) my EXS24 and Ultrabeat samples to my new 500GB along with BFD?
I ask this because I am not sure if those Logic instruments stream the audio from your HD or if they are loaded into RAM.
If they are indeed streamed I will plop them with my BFD and leave my native OS drive to just app running and as scratch recording (later putting the audio recordings on the secondary 500GB drive). Any advice? Thanks!

Greetings, Scroto.
This is not a straighforward answer...
EXS24 does its best to move what it needs into RAM. For instance, check out Options > Preferences on the EXS24 panel. You can even get the EXS24 to keep common samples in memory when switching songs.
However, I prefer to have anything that might make the drive work hard on my system disk. So, samples and video are normally on my system disk so that Logic can stream quite happily to my scratch disk. Having said that, I've sometimes had jerky video (Logic gives priority to audio) so moving that file to the scratch disk has given me silky smooth playback.
So, for my working rpactice at least, there are benefits in both methods. I have worked with people who put all AV material, including samples, projects (therefore including freeze files) and anything else on their scratch drives and then wonder why they get mixed results, including the dreaded out of sync message.
I only have two high-performance drives but can see the real benefit of having a third FW drive which can then hold all samples, video material and so on, leaving the scratch disk for audio alone. I'd appreciate comments from anybody who has tried this.
Pete

Xperia Z1 charging issues/ model number not listed in SUS

Hi there.
My Mothers Z1 (C6903) appears to be charging irregularly after being in for repairs for a broken screen. For example it will not charge when powered on, expect on occasion when plugged into computer, and has a 50/50 basis of charging when powered off and is quite slow at charging too, it is good that it charges when switched off, however this is not convienent for her.
I've read some previous threads and they recommended to use SUS to update the phone, however in SUS's list of phones, it does not include my model number: C6903, i wanted to ask the people here whether it would be safe to use another xperia Z1 model listed in SUS, and wether they have any thought on the issue.
Kindest Regards.
Quadrafox700.

Sorry for the late reply.
I took it to the shop in town, where the broken screen was fixed. When the man had a look at it and plugged it in, the phone started charging no problem what so ever. When switched on, it had no issue with charging either, i felt abit dumbfounded by this because it really was not charging over the weekend at all. I took it to the local 02 shop in town too, to get their advice and tried charging it there too. Without fail, it charged.
Over the week it's been charging no problem and seems to be functioning properly.
As much as this is good news, i'm still confused as to why it wouldn't charge over the weekend, but as soon as the guy at the shop tried, it worked.
Kindest Regards.
Quadrafox700.
Edit : Spelling.

Which driver should I use

I am considering to use a native JDBC driver instead of the JDBC-ODBC bridge. The reason for that is that I need an improvement in performance on select statements. Deletes, inserts and updates are not important.
Does anybody know what kind of improvement in performance I could expect when using a native JDBC driver? I'm using both Oracle 8i and MS SQL Server 2000 as databases, but I'm most interested in the performance improvement for SQL Server.
Has anybody tried for instance Microsoft's "own" JDBC driver?

MSs Jdbc Driver still requires Jdbc-Odbc bridge.
Just go thru the URL,
http://www.weblogic.com/docs/techsupport/faq/jdbckona_m
sqlserver.html#bridge
Hope this helps.
SudhaThanks for the URL, but I think this page does not refer to the beta-JDBC driver which MS has made available recently. For instance it says that Microsoft's driver is a type 2 driver, while in reality it is type 4.
Misja

Which drive should I get?

I discovered this morning that my iMac internal CD drive (superdrive) is broken. The computer does not see it and it won't take CD's and I can only assume that it has finally died.
Can anyone recommend a new internal CD drive (burning also) that I can install myself for my iMac G5 (10.4.11)
Thanks,
Julian

I have a MBP (first gen. unibody) that has a 320Gb drive as well. For primary backup, I have an OWC Mercury Elite-AL Pro firewire 800 1TB drive that works really well. It is actually partitioned with a ~320GB partition for a full bootable clone (which I update weekly or so) and then the rest for TM. With TM, I can go back several months for most things (much more for things that don't change often), and with the clone, I have a bootable clone right there if I ever need to boot to my desktop and all my stuff from an external source. The drive is about $180, but well worth it - firewire 800 (and it has 32MB cache) is noticeably faster then my older backup drive (a WD MyBook 1TB USB2 drive, which is now just general storage).
Just my opinion on one way to go.

Which drive should be the master?

HI all
I have a Power Mac G4 AGP, originally with 350mhz, but i upgraded the processor card to 1.2 Ghz. and I also have 1.31Gb of RAM. I need to upgrade the Hard Drive storage now I have a 40gig and an 80gig. i just purchased a Western Digital 250GB and a ACARD AEC-6280M PCI IDE Controller Card. My question is should i have the master drive on the 250gig drive or the 80gig or the 40 gig drive, does it matter how big the drive is, currently it is on the 40 gig drive. So the 40 and 80 that are currently on the G4 are UATA? and the new 250 gig is being accessed by the pci ata card, is there a difference? would the 250gig drive be faster?
sorry there a couple of questions here.
thanks so much

Hi, zinger123!
Regarding partitioning... consider the drives/volumes that you have, what you're using each of them for, and how you intend to backup/protect the data on each of them in case of a drive failure on any one of them. If partitioning will help to assure the safety of your data by configuring additional partitions/volumes to accomplish this, then go for it. If you already have a backup strategy in place that covers what's important to you on the three drives, and you decide that perhaps a spare volume is unnecessary, then run the drive as a single volume to get the most out of it.
If you do partition, the most common mistakes are to create too many partitions, and/or to create partitions which are too small to be effectively used, both of which waste drive space.
For example, if you now have, say, 30GB on your startup drive, and create a partition of 40 GB on a new drive to use as your new startup drive, you'll have a volume with 30GB of data and 25% free space for the OS to operate with. A year from now, the 30GB might be 35GB and the free space will decrease to 12.5%. At that point, you'll be concerned about a volume that's getting full again and perhaps wondering why you can't burn an iDVD project... Keep in mind that once you partition and load data onto one or more of the partitioned volumes, you must move the data from those volumes to repartition the drive, since safe repartitioning requires that the entire drive be erased in the process, or that a backup be done if a software-based, on-the-fly repartition is done. Thus, it's better to err on the "too-large" side than the "too-small" side...
For whatever it's worth, I selectively use partitioning when it suits my needs. I also have spare volumes/drives available for flexibility in moving large amounts of data or entire systems from one volume or drive to another. My six year old daughter and her friends can play all they want on my Macs and I don't have to worry about them deleting the System Folder or trashing my iTunes... The point is, you might give this some thought to make best use of your newly-acquired space and provide for backup.
Gary
1GHz DP G4 Quicksilver 2002, 400MHz B&W rev.2 G3, Mac SE30 Mac OS X (10.4.5) 5G iPod, Epson 2200 & R300 & LW Select 360 Printers, Epson 3200 Scanner

Model number not listed

I just bought this L655-s5117 Two weeks ago and cant find it listed on toshiba site. Best buy does not show it exsist. unable to list for support. Wassup?
Solved!
Go to Solution.

Here's a link, no problem finding it. http://www.csd.toshiba.com/cgi-bin/tais/support/jsp/modelContent.jsp?ct=DL&os=&category=&moid=284691...
Weiner dogs at large.

Mail program not listing which account used in the From: and To: descriptions

I have two separate email accounts, iMap and POP, that I access and use with the Apple Mail program in Snow Leopard. In the past, I could click on my name in either the To: or From: box and see which account/server the email came into or from. A while ago, that info started being less available for some reason. Now, it is never available. I can see the source (email address) of other peoples emails, but not mine.
This is all I see when I click on my name:
Copy address
Reply to Sender
New message
Open address book
Create Smartmailbox
Spotlight:"My name"
When I click on other names, I can see their email address. Never for my name, even though I will use two different email addresses depending on whether it is work-related or not.
This is annoying and seems like a feature has been changed. I can't figure out what setting I need to flip. What's goin on?
Thanks,
Nick

By default, Mail will always sent new messages from the account that is currently "selected" (ie, you have selected one of that account's mailboxes). However, you can easily change this in Mail's preferences. Choose Mail -> Preferences, then select the Composing tab, then change the pop-up menu next to "Send new messages from" to the desired account.

Model SB0220 not listed. Which driver should I u

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for