Monaco Font Looks Too Wide To Display on Konsole

I use Monaco as the default font of konsole. The bold format of Monaco font looks too wide to display a complete letter.
As shown in the picture, the last character of the file name disappears.
I also disselect the Draw intense colors in bold font checkbox in the konsole profile. It does not work. How could I fix that problem?
Last edited by speeds (2012-11-29 11:56:00)

yeah you can use the remote app on other ios devices and place the ios device in question as close to your eyes as you see fit

Similar Messages

  • Bold font is too wide in browsers

    I actually have Linux Mint installed, but searching google indicates that the Archlinux forum has far and away the most expertise with the gnome font system, including a very informative wiki page that I have read and tried to apply, unfortunately to no avail.
    The reason I'm asking this question is that I feel like I'm so close to having a gorgeous desktop, but what looks like a rendering error looks like it may frustrate me every time I surf the web.
    I've used advanced settings (which I installed following a tutorial) to set my system font to Sawasdee, which looks very good. In fact, I would call Sawasdee the best looking screen font, by my personal preference, that I've ever used.My problem is that bold text is too thick, but pretty much only in browsers, chrome and firefox.
    The Sawasdee font family has a great bold but for one reason or another that is not what is rendering, instead it looks like the browsers are taking the regular, elegant Sawasdee font and making it two or three times as wide.
    Is there a setting just to tell the system how to handle bold text?
    Below is a link to an image of the linux mint forum where I think the text that is not bold looks close to perfect, but the text that is bold looks almost unreadable:
    http://imgur.com/owffN.png
    Below is how the fonts look in the system and how firefox renders them:
    http://i.imgur.com/MXbuM.png
    It seems to me that the problem is that the applications are making their own bold font instead of using the one available. I wonder if I could rename a file or alter a config line somewhere to correct that.
    So far, I've added this to an /etc/fonts/local.conf file that I made using the header from font.conf but it did not help
    <match target="font">
        <test name="weight" compare="more">
            <const>medium</const>
        </test>
        <edit name="autohint" mode="assign">
            <bool>false</bool>
        </edit>
    </match>
    I really appreciate any help I can get.  If there is more information that might be helpful, I am eager to provide it.
    Last edited by ra1110laptop (2011-12-06 07:32:17)

    Sorry but we can give assistance for original Arch Linux only. Please ask on a Linux Mint forum for detailed help.
    But there is quite some information about your issue in the Arch forums and the wiki. Some quick search should help.
    Closing.

  • Fonts Look Too Heavy In Safari

    After installing Lion the way fonts display in Safari especially where they are bold are now too heavy which is closer to how they display on Safari in Windows. This is overdone as they looked better before.

    Actually they are fine now as I hadn't seen that Use LCD font smoothing had been turned on. Now off and back as before.

  • Font looking too small on certain sites (problem persists after a bit of basic troubleshooting)

    FF started handling fonts awry just out of the blue. I don't recall installing anything or fiddling with settings (be it Win7 or Firefox itself) the day before I started having this problem.
    I've tried by now:
    * Resetting zoom
    * Clearing history (didn't, however, clear site preferences)
    * JS, Basic Page Style are obviously enabled
    * Fiddling with minimum font size settings (to no avail)
    * Running FF in safe mode (thus, not an issue with my add-ons)
    Want to make it clear, that google isn't the only site affected.
    Print screen: [http://imageftw.com/uploads/20110830/firefox.jpg google search]
    EDIT: at the time I still had FF 5, updated it to 6 but the issue remained.

    Since Chrome is working, then there's something going wrong with your IE and Firefox installs of Flash Player.  Could you tell me what files you have in the C:\Windows\System32\Macromed\Flash folder?
    You might want to give a clean install a shot:
    How do I do a clean install of Flash Player?
    Then for IE issues, follow it up with the steps in:
    Enabling Flash Player in Internet Explorer 9

  • Anamorphic pal looks too *wide* - maybe...

    hi,
    (fcp 6.0.6)
    I think my eyes are going buggy...!! I'm working with anamorphic footage and all the sequence settings are correct, but the image in the Canvas looks stretched horizontally! And more odd, when I change the pixel ratio to square it squeezes it just a little horizontally and it looks correct!
    I thought anamorphic sequence was supposed to have pixel aspect of CCIR601 with "Anamorphic" checked
    I suspect the dv footage was really shot as 4:3. (or i imported incorrectly...?)
    When I export via compressor using dvpal anamorphic, it has the same horizontally stretched look.
    Does anyone know what could be happening?
    details...
    - I imported video from a panasonic dv camera that I was told what shot with the "widescreen" option selected.
    - I selected "DV PAL Anamorphic" for the capture preset (I'm in Aus, so PAL)
    - the imported clips settings are: 720x576 - DVPAL - PAL-CCIR601 - YES Anamorphic
    - The seq settings show:
    Frame Size: 720x576 CCIR 601/DVPAL (5:4)
    Pixel aspect: PAL-CCIR 601(720X576) Anamorphic 16:9 IS checked
    (compressor is DV-PAL)
    Thank you in advance for any help!

    Thanks Jim - So I have to get that camera and investigate it.
    If it isn't anamorphic, and I captured it as anamorphic, do I then have to re-capture, or can I just make sequence setting changes?
    The only way the image looks correct is with square pixels and anamorphic IS checked.
    ps - I figured out that the black pillars on either side were caused by ... open the clip in viewer > motion tab > distort > aspect ratio was 6.67 - and now i notice that almost all my sequences are like that but i haven't a clue how I did that!
    Josh

  • Dante font used in manuscript - when I try to save as a pdf document in Microsoft Word whole pages change their look, with wide gaps forming between certain paragraphs or sections. This does not happen with other fonts.

    Dante font used in manuscript … when I try to save as a pdf document in Microsoft Word whole pages change their look, with wide gaps forming between certain paragraphs or sections. This does not happen with other fonts.

    OK, we've got it!
    What is happening is that when you use Microsoft's save as PDF in Word, the font isn't embedded even though the font is tagged to allow embedding. Furthermore, Microsoft doesn't properly put the font name into the PDF file such that Acrobat or Reader can readily find the font installed on your system such that the text can be properly displayed and/or printed. Acrobat and Reader attempt to display and/or print the text using a “substitution font” and of course, as they say, YMMV (“your mileage may vary”)!
    I personally submitted the report of this problem (both the embedding and the font name problem) to Microsoft. They acknowledge the bug, tried a fix and provided me a build with it, but it wasn't right. Maybe they will ultimately fix it, maybe they won't. We don't know yet. We do know that if it is fixed, it will be fixed only for Office 2013 (problem occurs with all Office applications since they use the same PDF generation code) and thus such a fix won't help you.
    Adobe Acrobat Standard and Acrobat Pro  both provide an Adobe PDFMaker plug-in to Office applications (including full support for Office 2010) that adds an Acrobat Toolbar as well as a Save as Adobe PDF menu item. The resultant PDF file fully supports embedding of OpenType CFF, TrueType, and Type 1 fonts and in many other ways produces much superior PDF with a full range of PDF generation options not available with the Microsoft PDF. (Note that beginning with Office 2013, Microsoft does not support Type 1 fonts in Office documents at all, even for existing documents!) The Acrobat Office functions are widely used and respected in the end user community and whatever “issues” there are (all software has “issues” of some type - it is a matter of how many and how severe), you should be in much better shape for PDF production that with what you currently are using.
    Good luck and let us know if this resolves your problems. (Note that you can download and install a free fully-functional 30 trial of Acrobat Pro to assure that it meets your needs! You can then buy a license and activate what you already have installed.)
              - Dov

  • Bookmark display too wide

    Pardon any terminology that doesn't conform to Firefox terms. When I look at my bookmarks, the display is way too wide and thus difficult to work with.
    I have lots of Bookmarks and some of them are from sites that have put a ridiculous amount of text into the "title" field of the HTML page which is what is saved in addition to the URL when you bookmark a page.
    Firefox 4 differs from Firefox 3.x in having two obvious ways to display the list of your bookmarks.
    http://homepage.mac.com/jimcarr/FF4-1.png shows a list generated from menu at right edge of icon bar and has a rational width.
    http://homepage.mac.com/jimcarr/FF4-2.png shows list of same bookmarks as displayed with Bookmarks menu. There is a very wide item off the bottom of the list that has forced display way too wide.
    Would be helpful if a reasonable width limit was imposed--either fixed to same as smaller display or adjustable in about:config.

    Are you using code in [http://kb.mozillazine.org/UserChrome.css userChrome.css] ?
    See http://kb.mozillazine.org/Editing_configuration#How_to_edit_configuration_files
    Are you using the Default theme (Tools > Add-ons > Themes)?
    Does that still happen with a new profile?
    Create a new profile as a test to check if your current profile is causing the problems.<br />
    See [[Basic Troubleshooting#Make_a_new_profile|Basic Troubleshooting&#58; Make a new profile]]
    If that new profile works then you can transfer some files from the old profile to that new profile (be careful not to copy corrupted files)<br />
    See http://kb.mozillazine.org/Transferring_data_to_a_new_profile_-_Firefox

  • Sequence displaying too wide

    I must have messed up something, but I don't know what.
    I have two settings: 720x480 and 640x360. Both are set to the actual size of the footage being used. This worked just fine before (and still works in one old file - but if I import it into a new file - it has the same issue).
    The issue is the display screen for these sequences is WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAY too wide. I have huge black bars on the side - and, yes, they export that way. I have no idea why it's so wide when it's SUPPOSED to be as noted above, and says it is in info, but clearly it's not when it's such a long and skinny rectangle that it makes the footage almost look square. :S
    Help?! I can't get any work done until this is fixed.

    Jim,
    No. There is some sort of glitch happening in the program. There are no black bars in the footage.
    The video shows correctly in the source window. But I can literally fit TWO of them side by side in the sequence window. So the sequence is NOT 720x480, even though it says it is, it's 1440x480.
    I have tested these videos before - I have files where they looked fine - but if I open those same files - the sequence window has stretched itself out.
    This is not anything in the video - though I checked all of that, just to be sure. The video does not provide any help for my issue.

  • I created a brochure in pages and exported it to a pdf format. The pdf looks and opens perfectly using preview but when opened in adobe reader (which my printer uses), fonts look odd, transparencies don't display...etc. Tells me error exists on page?

    I created a brochure in pages and exported it to a pdf format. The pdf looks and opens perfectly using preview but when opened in adobe reader (which my printer uses), fonts look odd, transparencies don't display...etc. Tells me error exists on page?

    Does this essentially mean there is no way to fix this problem on my end? It's a pity because the design and branding of my brochure will suffer if I remove transparencies and use different fonts. It also concerns me moving forward because it means the quality of print on my pieces will be significantly lower because most commercial printers use Adobe products.

  • Reports Parameter form via rwservlet in 9i Reports display is too wide

    We have an app which was developed in Web Forms 6/6i which we are migrating to 9iAS Release 2/Reports 9i. We are running the .RDF reports using WEB.SHOW_DOCUMENT with rwservlet and PARAMFORM=YES. The parameter form sizes are generally 5x5, but the parameters display much wider in the 9iAS Release 2/Reports 9i environment in the Web Browser than they did in 6i. I have tried making the Parameter Form smaller, but the display still is way too wide: The browser window has to be scrolled several inches to the right to be viewed.
    Any ideas on the root cause of this issue and how to fix? Or, any solutions to fix besides using RUN_REPORT_OBJECT? We don't have time or resources to write 100 parameter forms in Forms and do the call to Reports that way. Any help is appreciated. Thanks.

    Hi Judith, we had the same problem and the fix was to add the following parameter to the reports.sh file in the BI&Forms Oracle home:
    REPORTS_DEFAULT_PIXEL_SIZE=80;
    export REPORTS_DEFAULT_PIXEL_SIZE
    After that, the report server needed to be stopped and restarted for the change to take effect.

  • Photoshop display a little too wide

    I haven't been able to figure out a solution to this annoying problem.
    I'm running Windows Vista on an HP with a 24" LCD monitor, an NVidea 8800# series video card and when I bring up Photoshop the display is a little too wide for the screen. Not a lot too wide, just a little too wide so that the left hand side of the display is cut off...just a little. It's not inoperable as I can guess at what is there from what is already showing on my screen but it would be much better if this wasn't happening. I don't know if I should be addressing this in an Adobe forum or somewhere else but it isn't happening with my other applications (i.e. Word, internet site screens etc).
    If anybody could give me a clue, I'd appreciate it.
    Thanks,
    j.

    Are you running the monitor at its native resolution? If not, you
    should. Most 24" widescreens are 1920x1200.
    Bob

  • I want the old download display back! Library font is too small, do NOT want the sidebar!

    Just upgraded to 20.0 on XP SP3 - not interested in 'library' display; font is too small to read, do not need/want the sidebar, and need/want the % complete to show as it did in the old download display.
    Also, how do I turn off the distracting and stupid fade-in/fade-out large green arrow on download completion - again not something I'm interested or have any use for.

    I haven't tried it myself, but check out the solution in this thread: [https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/questions/955204 Got new version, want to go back to previous download box, the new one has no history and doesn't show speed of download, how do I go back?]
    The green arrow, like other toolbar controls, can be hidden by using the Customize feature. Kick that off by doing either of these:
    * right-click a blank area of the Tab bar > Customize
    * View menu > Toolbars > Customize
    Drag the unwanted arrow into the dialog with the other unused buttons, the click Done.
    Does that fix it?

  • Display bug LR CC: adjustment panels seem too wide

    All the Adjustment tools (crop-gradient filters, etc)have their panel too wide. This cuts off the numbers on the left. See screen shot. OSX 10.10.2.

    Other info: it only happens in FRENCH with a long slider name: On the image above, note the "Defringe"; in French it is way longer "Supprimer la frange". I changed the language to verify, and it is the case.

  • PS is too wide (large) to display on my iMac

    I don't know what I've done, but both my my lightroom  and PS CS4 are now too large to display on my iMac.  Both vertically and horizontally.  I've been using them for a couple of years and never had this problem?  Any ideas on how to fix this?  I hate having to move the cursor to each side of the screen to see the panels in Lightroom and the same in Photoshop. 

    You accidentally resize the frames to large. Increase the resolution of the screen just temporarily so you can see the bottom right corner of the frames then reszie them smaller and that will hold when you relaunch.
    If you can somehow drag the frames until you see the lower right corner then you do not have to change the resolution of the screen just drag that corner toward the center of the screen until you are happy with the size of the frame.
    I sometimes make it bigger so I do not accidentally adjust some thing I dod not want to adjust. Probably not necessary but I do it any way.

  • Navigation bar too wide for template graphic after creating new page

    I want to stick within the templates, but I have a lot of pages and don't want them all in the nav bar. When I flagged a page to keep it out of the NAV bar, the NAV bar get messed up - not properly displaying at the edge of the template, like it made room for the hidden page's link then re-adjusted itself too wide for the background graphic. I've got the problem in the elegant template when displayed in IE on Windows (1024X768). Safari on my mac looks OK. Are there any other setting changes I can make to be better compatible?
    Thanks
    Anne

    It appears to have been a cache issue or some such. I no longer see the problem

Maybe you are looking for