Monitor Mapping with Message-Splitting

Hello,
Does anyone know how to monitor a Message-Splitting-Mapping with the Graphical Mapping Tool.
in my case i read data via the jdbc-connector and i have to split the data.
Can I monitor which new Messages are created, when i only know the senders MessageId?
thx
Christian

>>>>>>when i only know the senders MessageId?
Raster, what is the senders MessagesId u referred here?
raj.

Similar Messages

Mapping-based message splits in PI7.0

We have developed an integration scenario on XI 3.0 that uses mapping-based message splits (1:n transformation without BPM). This is available since SP14 I think.
Now we want to upgrade to PI 7.0: Are mapping-based message splits a standard feature of PI 7.0 or do we need a certain SP as well?

Hi,
It should be available with Pi 7.0 with default
And also compare the SP's and do finalization
in 2004 - in 2004s
SP12 & < - SP04
SP13 + 14 - SP05
SP15 - SP06
SP16 - SP07
SP17 - SP08
SP18 - SP09
Xi's Latest SP is SP 21 and PI's is SP 14
Regards
Seshagiri

Multi mapping and message splitting in BPM

Hi ,
I am working with this scenario ...
/people/sudharshan.aravamudan/blog/2005/12/01/illustration-of-multi-mapping-and-message-split-using-bpm-in-sap-exchange-infrastructure
how many message interfaces i have to create .
one outbound , one abstract and two inbound .. is it correct.

Hi
Minimum you need to create three message interfaces i.e. Bpm_In_MI_Abstract, aBpm_Out_MI_Abstract Bpm_Out1_MI_Abstract, because abstract interfaces can be use inbound and outbound as well.
You can also use create implement it by using inbound and outbound message interfaces. In that case you have to use three additional interfaces(1 outbound and 2 inbound).
Regards
Sami
Reward points if helpful.

Multi-Mapping and Message Split using BPM

Hi All,
Could anyone pls let me know clearly how message mapping can be done for this weblog
/people/sudharshan.aravamudan/blog/2005/12/01/illustration-of-multi-mapping-and-message-split-using-bpm-in-sap-exchange-infrastructure
Thanks,
Ram

Hi,
When you are doing Message mapping after adding the Messaget types for source and target messages. You can click on the "" button in the target message and add one more tab. You can go to Message tab as shown in the 5th image and click "" button to add one more message type. Then do the mapping as usual.
Based on the value of the element(name), the node of input(details)should be directed to one of the two message types
Here in this blog it is done based on the Name.
You need to use IFTHENELSE boolean function and do the mapping.
Thanks,
Prakash

Multi-Mapping and Message Split using BPM UDFs Error

hi
As per the below blog
Illustration of Multi-Mapping and Message Split using BPM in SAP Exchange Infrastructure
I have just modified the UDFs(1.selectnodeifA 2.selectNodeifB)
1.selectnodeifA
for(int i=0;i<=n;i++)
if(Name.equals("A"))
result.addValue(Node);
2.selectNodeifB
for(int i=0;i<=n;i++)
if(Name.equals("B"))
result.addValue(Node);
while checking I am getting the following errors
Source code has syntax error:
D:/usr/sap/D10/DVEBMGS01/j2ee/cluster/server0/./temp/classpath_resolver/Mapdc8fa4d0896011dd907d001cc01cef0d/source/com/sap/xi/tf/_bpm_mm_.java:132: cannot resolve symbol
symbol : variable n
location: class com.sap.xi.tf._bpm_mm_
for(int i=0;i<=n;i++)
^
D:/usr/sap/D10/DVEBMGS01/j2ee/cluster/server0/./temp/classpath_resolver/Mapdc8fa4d0896011dd907d001cc01cef0d/source/com/sap/xi/tf/_bpm_mm_.java:140: cannot resolve symbol symbol : variable n
location: class com.sap.xi.tf._bpm_mm_
for(int i=0;i<=n;i++)
^
2 errors
The source code given in the blog is correct ? I thought for loop has not completed
pls help
manian

Hi manian,
I was having a look to Illustration of Multi-Mapping and Message Split using BPM in SAP Exchange Infrastructure blog.
The functions are not the same. I mean, yours and blogs functions.
Each function has two parameters, Name and node. Furtheremore, in the blogs' functions is using arrays and you don't.
So, the right code will be
1.selectnodeifA
for(int i=0;i<=node.length();i++)
if(Name.equals("A"))
result.addValue(Node);
However, if you don't need an advance user defined function as you want to process just one element of the node's queue, you will not need to use for sentence.
Something like:
1.selectnodeifA
// for(int i=0;i<=n;i++)
if(Name.equals("A"))
result.addValue(Node);
Hope it is usefull for you.
Carlos

Mapping Based Message Split

In mapping based MessageSplit
how to createInterfaceDetermination,ReceiverDetermination.In My Scenario one sender, 2 Receivers.
Now How many InterfaceDetermination's,ReceiverDetermination's have to be create

Hi Mahesh,
having performed your message mapping ,, used in interface determination(by linking it with the help of interface mapping via configuration).
You can decide on the value in the payload to which receiver the message should go.
Use following scenarios, may help you:-
/people/venkat.donela/blog/2005/03/03/introduction-to-simple-file-xi-filescenario-and-complete-walk-through-for-starterspart2
/people/venkat.donela/blog/2005/03/02/introduction-to-simplefile-xi-filescenario-and-complete-walk-through-for-starterspart1
/people/daniel.graversen/blog/2006/12/29/hack-using-xpath-in-xi-message-mappings
/people/bhanu.thirumala/blog/2006/02/02/graphical-message-mapping-150-text-preview
/people/srinivas.vanamala2/blog/2007/02/05/step-by-step-guide-xml-file-2-xml-file-scenario-part-ii
/people/srinivas.vanamala2/blog/2007/02/05/step-by-step-guide-xml-file-2-xml-file-scenario-part-i
/people/divya.vidyanandanprabhu/blog/2005/06/28/converting-xml-to-pdf-using-xi
/people/venugopalarao.immadisetty/blog/2007/01/24/troubleshooting-file-to-idoc-scenario-in-xi
/people/prateek.shah/blog/2005/06/08/introduction-to-idoc-xi-file-scenario-and-complete-walk-through-for-starters
Vishal
Reward points for useful Reply

Challange with message split

Hi All.
I have to create a several files from one file according to the customer number
and I have to attach the right reference to the right customer positon number
let say I have the follwong file
<libarary>
<customer>
<pos>1</pos>
<nr>1</nr>
</customer>
<customer>
<pos>2</pos>
<nr>1</nr>
</customer>
<customer>
<pos>3</pos>
<nr>2</nr>
</customer>
<customer>
<pos>4</pos>
<nr>2</nr>
</customer>
<references>
<ref>1</ref>
<ref>2</ref>
<ref>3</ref>
<ref>4</ref>
</references>
</libarary>
according to the requirement I have to create 2 files , one for customer 1 and one for customer 2.
this is can be achieved by using split by value function to create 2 or more files , but my the challenge is how can I attache the ref field to the right pos field.
which means ref 1 and ref 2 should go to the file with pos 1 and pos 2 and ref 3 and ref 4 should go to the file with pos 3 and pos 4
the finale result should be like this
File 1
<File>
<customer>
<pos>1</pos>
<nr>1</nr>
</customer>
<customer>
<pos>2</pos>
<nr>1</nr>
</customer>
<references>
<ref>1</ref>
<ref>2</ref>
</references>
</File>
File 2
<File>
<customer>
<pos>3</pos>
<nr>2</nr>
</customer>
<customer>
<pos>4</pos>
<nr>2</nr>
</customer>
<references>
<ref>3</ref>
<ref>4</ref>
</references>
</File>
Any help will be higly apreciated
Thank you.

You have make sure all the levels properly mapped:
libarary/customer/nr -> removeConext() ->splitByvalue[ValueChange] -> CollapsContext() -> File
libarary/customer/nr -> removeConext() ->splitByvalue[ValueChange] -> customer
libarary/customer/nr -> removeConext() ->splitByvalue[ValueChange] -> CollapsContext() -> SplitByvalue[each value] -> File/customer/references
reference/ref----
>
FormatByExample() -> ref
libarary/customer/nr -> removeConext ->splitByvalue[ValueChange]-->
libarary/customer/nr -> File/customer/nr
Liang

Multi-mapping with message bundling but without using BPM

Hi all,
I have a requirement to bunch specific no. of records (say 50) from source message and create separate target messages for those bunches. For example, if the source message has 120 records, then there should be three separate target messages created containing 50, 50 and 20 records each.
I am wondering whether this multi-mapping is possible without using BPM, as the typical no. of records in the source message are in the range of 600 to 800, and rarely (twice or thrice a month) they shoot up to 2000. So my concern is whether BPM would affect the performance. We are using PI at SP12.
Regards,
- Shankar.

Sorry for late reply.. Well the sender is a file system, which sends a single XML file containing multiple records. (I mean I have a sender file adapter that polls periodically from a specific path and picks up the file when it is available)
The no. of records in the source file may be different in each run. The requirement on the receiver system is that it can handle a file which has maximum of 'n' records only (say 50 in my example)
Now the sender file can contain any no. of records. It may contain 10 on some day, or 200 the next day, or 120 on the third day. But on the receiver side, I want the files to be created such that each will contain AT MAX 50 records.
So, if source file has <=50 records, then there will be only 1 target file having the same no. of records.
If source file has between 51 to 100 records, then there will be two target files. One will have 50 records, and the second will have remaining records.
And so on..
Regards,
- Shankar.

Process over BPM with message split: strange behavior

Hi everybody,
introduction:
We poll a file from a file-server and pass it to BPM. in BPM there is a multimapping. With each single message a WebService is called.
Now we see that after a special amount of messages, each message is send (from BPM to WebService) four-times; other 3 times.
This is the error: Every message should be send one time.
There is no error in multimapping!
I wonder, why I see more than ONE entry in SXMB_MONI_BPE.
I compared the errorness process with another process, that was OK
In the process that was OK, I see just ONE entry in SXMB_MONI_BPE.
Any suggestions?
Thanks a lot
Regards Mario

Hi,
I hope this is not BUG.
For every message from IP and to IP two messages will be generated each time.
so total four.. this is the process of the IP..
Please read the below link and page no .11
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/c071d7bb-0601-0010-d6b8-f4e4dc7f1e20
Points rewarded please if it is usefull..
Regards
Chilla..

Message split via BPM Status stays TBDL

Hi to all,
I have a Scenario with a BPM.
In the IntegrationProcess (IP_Split), is a mapping with message splitting.
The result von the Mapping are serveral Proxymessages and a var count, that counts the new Messages.
After, i have a loop over the messages an with the receiverdetermination i send the new messages to the SAP-System.
the Scenario works fine. in SXI_MONITOR it looks great.
There is only one Problem:
When i go to the Integration Engine in the Message Monitoring (Runtime Workbench) there is a strange Message.
There is a Message with SenderService and ReceiverService IP_Split. The Status is still TBDL.
Can anybody help me?
Thanks
Chris

Hi,
Few months ago we had also problems with "locked user" in XI, in our case XIAPPLUSER was sometimes (b)locked.
Perhaps note:
721548 Changing the passwords of the XI 3.0 service users
will help you.
We removed and entered the service users again, with the password in CAPITALS and language blank.
After that our problem was solved, I hope yours too.
Regards
Jack

Mapping - message split

Hi all,
I need a little bit help with message splitting.
I have message structure like below. The Error Node exists in all rows, in first part it is initial (with no value), then come rows with different error messages.
<Message1>
<Row>
 <node1>a</node1>
 <node2>a</node2>
 <Errror/>
</Row>
<Row>
 <node1>a</node1>
 <node2>a</node2>
 <Errror/>
</Row>
<Row>
 <node1>a</node1>
 <node2>a</node2>
 <Errror>text_a</Errror>
</Row>
<Row>
 <node1>a</node1>
 <node2>a</node2>
 <Errror>text_b</Errror>
</Row>
</Message1>
I need to split it into 2 messages so, that in first message will be rows without error, and in the second with.
<Message1>
<Row>
 <node1>a</node1>
 <node2>a</node2>
</Row>
<Row>
 <node1>a</node1>
 <node2>a</node2>
</Row>
</Message1>
<Message2>
<Row>
 <node1>a</node1>
 <node2>a</node2>
 <Errror>text_a</Errror>
</Row>
<Row>
 <node1>a</node1>
 <node2>a</node2>
 <Errror>text_b</Errror>
</Row>
</Message2>
Is this feasible with graphical mapping? How can I can make the assignment of the row once to first and
other time to second message? Or do I have to use XSLT/ABAP? (I am not very familiar with java...) Thanks for any suggestions.

Hello,
Prateek, Jude,
I think you did not get the point.When I map it just in the simple way it will look like this:
Input rows:
1 - no error
2 - no error
3 - error
4 - error
5 - error
Output
Message1 rows:
1,2,3,4,5
Message2 rows:
1,2,3,4,5
I will have 10 rows in output (I want to have just 5 and in this way M1-1,2; M2-3,4,5).
Udo,
I have tried already this approach. However it does not work as desired.
I have mapped:
Error node -> not -> exists -> if
Input_message_Row -> then
output -> Output_message1_Row
Error node -> exists -> if
Input_message_Row -> then
output -> Output_message2_Row
However the decision is made on the first row, and the first row is mapped also to second message, and that is all. The next rows are not considered at all:
Input:
<ns0:Messages xmlns:ns0=...>
 <ns0:Message1>
 <ns1:MT...>
 <Row>
 <test1>11</test1>
 <Errror/>
 </Row>
 <Row>
 <test1>111</test1>
 <Errror/>
 </Row>
 <Row>
 <test1>111bb</test1>
 <Errror/>
 </Row>
 <Row>
 <test1>11a</test1>
 <Errror>a</Errror>
 </Row>
 <Row>
 <test1>11axx</test1>
 <Errror>axx</Errror>
 </Row>
 </ns1:MT...>
 </ns0:Message1>
</ns0:Messages>
Output:
<ns0:Messages xmlns:ns0=...>
 <ns0:Message1>
 <ns1:MT...>
 <Row>
 <test1>11</test1>
 </Row>
 </ns1:MT...>
 </ns0:Message1>
 <ns0:Message2>
 <ns1:MT2...>
 <Row>
 <test1>11</test1>
 <Errror/>
 </Row>
 </ns1:MT2...>
 </ns0:Message2>
</ns0:Messages>

IDOC Message Splitting with Logic

Hi, I have a business requirement for IDOC to IDOC mapping where the incoming IDOC line item should be split in to multiple line items based on a field value and also the resulting IDOC will be split in to multiple IDOCs based on a limitation on the number of line items. Without using BPM, have anybody used SAP XI to efficiently perform the above logics with proper check logics and error controls ? Appreciate your responses.

Hi Raj,
Try this:
You can use Split by Value node function and set the properties of the split by value as: Each Value.So the for every different number,different item will be created.
Using the Node Functions you can solve your problem.
1.SplitByValue:
The SplitByValue() function is the counterpart to removeContexts(): Instead of deleting a context, you can insert a context change in the source value queue. You then receive this element for each inserted context change instead of a top node element. However, for this to be possible, the top node source field must be assigned a top node target field and minOccurs must be >0. You can insert a context change in the queue after each value, after each change to the value, or after each tag without a value.
2.RemoveContexts:
You use removeContexts () to delete all the top contexts for an element. This removes all top hierarchy levels, so that all elements of the target queue are assigned to a root element of the source queue.
Advanced user-defined functions can import either just one context into the input arrays, or complete queues. Make your selection by selecting or deselecting the Save Entire Queue in Cache checkbox in the function editor.
3.CreateIf:
CreateIf node function is used to create a node if true value is passed to it otherwise suppress it.
4.collapseContext
To remove the context in between the value and transfer only one value at a time
5.useOneAsMany
First Input:
The value which is needed to be repeated.
Second Input:
It defines how many times the first input should be repeated.
Third Input:
It define when the context should be changed (on the basis of the required output
Please go through the given link hope it will be helpful to you.
/people/sravya.talanki2/blog/2005/12/08/message-mapping-simplified-150-part-ii
Message Mapping Simplified Part II
/people/sravya.talanki2/blog/2005/12/08/message-mapping-simplified-150-part-ii
Replication of Nodes Using the Graphical Mapping Tool
/people/claus.wallacher/blog/2006/04/17/replication-of-nodes-using-the-graphical-mapping-tool
Message Splitting Using the Graphical Mapping Tool
/people/claus.wallacher/blog/2006/06/29/message-splitting-using-the-graphical-mapping-tool
Also check this weblogs:
/people/sravya.talanki2/blog/2005/08/16/message-mapping-simplified--part-i
/people/sravya.talanki2/blog/2005/12/08/message-mapping-simplified-150-part-ii
Split by value
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/21/3bb8c495125e4eb5969f0377885fe0/content.htm
For value mapping check this video presentation and weblog:
/people/sreekanth.babu2/blog/2005/02/23/value-mapping-replication
/people/community.user/blog/2007/01/08/valuemapping-using-the-graphical-mapping-tool
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/docs?rid=/webcontent/uuid/110ff05d-0501-0010-a19d-958247c9f798#xi [original link is broken]
/people/claus.wallacher/blog/2006/04/17/replication-of-nodes-using-the-graphical-mapping-tool
Function formatByExample:
/people/sundararamaprasad.subbaraman/blog/2006/02/21/real-example-for-formatbyexample
Split by value, remove context and collapse context:
/people/sravya.talanki2/blog/2005/12/08/message-mapping-simplified-150-part-ii
Reward points if this helps
Regards
Pragathi.

Message Splitting issue (without bpm)

Hi Experts,
I was currently trying to create a message split (1 message --> 2 output) using BPM like in this blog: Illustration of Multi-Mapping and Message Split using BPM in SAP Exchange Infrastructure
Then i noticed that it was also possible to achieve this without using BPM (creating a interface mapping with 2 outputs, and using the interface determination with the extended option) like on this one:
Illustration of Multi-Mapping and Message Split using BPM in SAP Exchange Infrastructure
(but using the structure showed in the first blog since i was just testing)
The issue i have is that even when it worked, and i see all good in the XML monitoring (SMXB_MONI) the both resulting files appear only with one field, and i can't see the others
Example from the XML monitoring:
ORIGINAL FILE: (I split based on the id 1 and 2)
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
- <ns:bpm_in_MT xmlns:ns="http://bpm.com/splitting">
- <record>
- <details>
<name>Jorge</name>
<id>1</id>
</details>
- <details>
<name>Fernando</name>
<id>2</id>
</details>
</record>
</ns:bpm_in_MT>
RESULT FILE 1:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
- <ns1:bpm_out_MT xmlns:ns1="http://bpm.com/splitting">
- <record>
- <info>
<name>Jorge</name>
<id>1</id>
</info>
</record>
</ns1:bpm_out_MT>
RESULT FILE 2:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
- <ns1:bpm_out1_MT xmlns:ns1="http://bpm.com/splitting">
- <record>
- <info>
<name>Fernando</name>
<id>2</id>
<age>20</age>
</info>
</record>
</ns1:bpm_out1_MT>
HERE's the ISSUE:
Files in the FTP folder:
file1.txt with only "Jorge "
file2.txt with only "Fernando "
when the first file should have 2 fields (id is included), and the second one should be name (id and age included)
Could this be a parsing issue? i'm confused since i see no errors in the channels
I'm using 2 FTP receivers channels with Content conversion
CC_FTP_first_file_receiver:
Recordset: info
info.fieldNames name,id
info.fieldFixedLengths 15,1
info.keyFieldValue 1
info.endSeparator 'nl'
info.processFieldNames fromConfiguration
CC_FTP_second_file_receiver:
Recordset: info
info.fieldNames name,id,age
info.fieldFixedLengths 15,1,2
info.keyFieldValue 2
info.endSeparator 'nl'
info.processFieldNames fromConfiguration
I may have no use for the keyfieldvalue since i'm only saving that file in FTP, but i already removed that and it didn't change much, i still get 2 files, but only with the "name" tag on them
Any ideas??
i'm sure i'm missing something basic, but i'm don't have much experience on XML
Thanks!

Hi,
This is really intersting as well as unexpected result...if you used directly the XML format then 2 fiels are created with appropriate data with all fields....
And if you used the FCC then , fields are missing...so one thing is clear that as you have already said..issue is with FCC only...
Have you tried to process only single file with FCC instead of 2 files at a time.
Also if possible try out with fieldSeperator parameter instead of FixedFieldLenghts...see whats the result...
I hope this will give you the hint...
Thanks
swarup

Multi-Mapping with BPM?

Hi Experts,
Can anyone send me a scenario which contains multi-mapping using BPM (collect pattern)........I searched on SDN but cudn't find any scenario which contains Multi-Mapping BPM scenarios. All the scenarios which r available based on without BPM.............points will given to the approriate replies.
Thanks in Advance
Faisal

Hey
strange you didn't find it,it was the second link when i searched SDN with the string "multimapping BPM"
/people/sudharshan.aravamudan/blog/2005/12/01/illustration-of-multi-mapping-and-message-split-using-bpm-in-sap-exchange-infrastructure
Thanx
Aamir

Message splitting 1:n without BPM error : 404 Not Found

hi,
is u r server is updated with sps14
please once check this.. may be this is the problem
Thanks,
Madhav.
Note:points if useful

hi,
please go through the limitation of this bolg
A mapping-based message split will ultimately produce n individual messages, but not until it reaches the Adapter Engine (AE). Inside the Integration Engine (IE), the messages are grouped together and persisted as one bulk message. The bulk message is sent to the AE where it splits the bulk message into individual messages and persists them.
Restrictions
u2022 Messages that result from the split in a mapping-based message split are sent using one AE. So only adapters running on the AE are supported. In particular, this means that target IDOC/HTTPmassagee splits are not supported since the IDOC/HTTP adapter is not part of the AE.
u2022 The target system of the message splits cannot be an integration process.
u2022 Attachments from the original message are not appended to the messages resulting from the message split.
now i think u wont be able to send the the 2 diffrent file in diffrent location.both the file cab be sent to be togethre.because when u configure the receiver determination in ID u need to include both receiver service as a receiver.and thus u need to configuer 4 interface determinatio as well as 4 receiver aggrement. this is because you r using the only one IM which containg both the interface.
regards,
navneet

Monitor Mapping with Message-Splitting

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for