Monitor user access to planning

Hi
I am trying to find out Users login information in planning, who is accessd planning application at what time. Where can find this information
From view statistics i can see only currently logged in users.
Thanks,

Hi,
You have to enable Audit Trail for this.
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/middleware/planning/tutorials/index-091248.htmlThanks,
Avneet

Similar Messages

Monitor user access (Fusion Middleware)

Hi All
Please advise if it is possible to monitor user login and logoff times when accessing any of the various fusion middleware components...
Specifically SOA Suite 11g (Enterprise Manager, OSB, etc).
I would like to audit and report on the time, duration, and tasks completed each time a user accesses any of the components mentioned above.
I have come across a Product called [Oracle Enterprise Manager Grid Control] that might be suitable to my requirements.
Your expert opinion in this regard will be highly appreciated.
Regards

Hi,
You have to enable Audit Trail for this.
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/middleware/planning/tutorials/index-091248.htmlThanks,
Avneet

How to find out total of number of users accessing Hyperion Planning applications ?

Hi All,
Could someone help me with the details of how to find out total number of users who are accessing Hyperion Planning application in Env.?
This is with regard to licenses so wanted accurate and unique information,
Thanks
Amith

Hello Amith,
I think you should have a look at the blog of Cameron Lackpour http://camerons-blog-for-essbase-hackers.blogspot.be/
In the "Shared Services Stupid Trick" blogs, he shows how to find the real access to an application. The side benefit is that it is amusing to read.
In how far this is OK for the licenses is written on another page. You likely need to use the same method as Oracle does. Ask the Salesperson how to do this. (I am curious what his/her reply is).
Regards,
Philip Hulsebosch.

User access to "planning " data forms

hi
iam newbie to planning
i have two different doubts in planning
i have created a application in eas called "blue " in eas console and loaded the data and retrieved in excel , iam able to see the data . mean while i have created planning application called "gt" and its created sucessfully, i can able to "gt" see in the eas console . i wanted to get the data from "blue" in eas into planning "gt" dataforms i created a user called "blue" in shared services console , i decided to give the privilege to "blue" in eas , i clicked on the default application to blue application but was nt there ,but it showing separtely , i clicked on that and assigned roles like "administrator" and cube creator and planner
my doubt is that
1: when i logon "gt " planning application and created dataform folder i want to access the essbase application "blue" data, but there is no user available in that dataform
iam confused whether i should give privileges to default application or "gt " i find both of them in shared services console
clearly my doubt how to link eas "blue" with planning "gt " and datas form blue should be retrived in gt dataform
iam using epm11
sreekumar.H
OLAP-DEVELOPER

Hi,
I am not totally sure what you are trying to achieve but if you create an essbase application in EAS it is a totally seperate entity from a planning application, so you can't just access it directly.
The are many options on what to do but it needs to be clearer why you have to access the data from a seperate database.
If there is a commonality in the dimensions then it would have been possible to create an extra plan type when you created the planning application, this creates an extra database as part of the planning application.
The other options are to use XREFs to access data from one to cube to another.
Another option would to use partitions.
You could extract the data from one cube using an export or DATAEXPORT command and then load it into your planning database or use ODI to extract from one database and load it into the other.
Cheers
John
http://john-goodwin.blogspot.com/

Restrict User Access to Planning Books- Creation of Roles

Hi All
I want to restrict the users to access/see only limited number of planning books in SDP94
menu
For this, I tried creating a role and assigned authorization C_APO_PB with required planning book values
However I am not sure how to create the role properly. In the change role screen, the "Menu" and the "Workflow" tabs are red, while authorization tab is green
Do I need to do any activity in Menu and Workflow tabs
Please guide
Any help on this is highly appreciated
Thanks
Vijay

Moderator message - Cross post locked
Rob

Monitoring user access

hi experts!...
is there anyway to monitor client who is downloading , using the most bandwidth in cisco wireless environment ? i have 1240 ap and 4400 controller environment.
please advice.
thanks..

You can start doing radius accounting and then check all the statistics from your accounting server.
Nicolas.

Copying user access in Hyperion Planning

Hi All,
I am supposed to copy the one user access to another user...I know we can copy user access to a newuser or existing user in Essbase....Is this possible in Hyperion planning 4.0..??Please let me know..
Regards,
Prabhas

Amit Gupta wrote:
If you dont have access setup by groups, there is no easy way. Well.. what i am suggesting is relatively easy but you need planning server access for this.
1. Export all security using exportsecurity.cmd, you can set parameters to make sure you are exporting exactly what you need.
2. find the user whose access you want to copy.
3. replicate these rows for new user.
4. then run importsecurity.cmd to import access for new user.Where these Exportsecurity.cmd,Importsecurity.cmd statements available ? and How to use those in Planning web ?
Please suggest

Multiple User Accessing the same record issue

I am planning to design an app where we have the following use case requirement.
If a user who is logged into the system is accessing a record(plan in this case) anyone else who is logged into the system at the same time should be locked out of that same plan but should still be able to access other plans in the system. A plan has many things associated with it so the 2nd user should be locked out of everything associated to the plan being accessed by the first user.
What is the best way to implement this at the application or the database level?
Here are some options we have been bouncing around.
1. When the first user logs in and accesses the first plan we lock the plan at the app level using a singleton class which has one and only one instance on the app server. The plan_id can be put as an entry into a hashtable which can be in the session and is created if one does not exist. When the 2nd user tries to access the same plan, since the plan_id is still in the hashtable he would be locked out. However we somehow need to timeout the first user after 30 mts of inactivity or so so that others can access the plan and are not locked out for ever if the first user walks away from his PC or does not close his browser, thus keeping his session alive indefinitely.
2. In the database in the plan table we add a column for 'locked'. When the first entry is created in the plan table locked column is marked as 'yes' or 1 and when the user closes the browser we use some javascript to trigger an event which changes that 'yes' or 1 to 'no' or 0 thus unlocking the plan. However the big issue we see in this concept is that we will have to put a javascript onUnload method in all jsp pages in the app because the user could be anywhere in the app after starting his plan access after login.
Conceptually the 2 options are the same but one is done at the app whereas the other is at the database level.
Is there a better way to handle this scenario using transactions or some other technological option.
Thanks

Another solution involving no modification of the database structure:
As soon as a user want to access a plan, try to UPDATE the plan record... if it fails, the record was locked
by another user before. When the user has finished with the plan, you can COMMIT or ROLLBACK the changes, which will free the lock for other users.
An advantage of this solution is that if program crashes unexpectedly, there will automatically be a ROLLBACK.
Of course, you need a transaction for this... and perhaps more if you want to separate the 'locking transaction' (virtual update just for restricting access) from the 'operating transaction' (in which you will
do the DB stuff: inserts, updates, deletes, etc.)
Hope this helped,
Regards.

File structure and Multi-user access/control

Hi All
Currently evaluating RH. Our plan is to use RH HTML with RoboServer and either SourceSafe or Team Foundation for source control. We will be producing the "printed" manual (PDF) and publishing online help (hopefully html via RH server) from the single source layout
Given that we will edit content in RH's XHTML editor, I'm not clear on when we should create new files or the granularity of multi-user access. We have 17 apps and I plan to use a master project and merging (because we need to link to related topics in other apps).
I'm really not sure what should constitute a file in RH. First off, is access controlled at the file level?
I want to have multiple authors editing the same manual at the same time, so do I need to break the manual into multiple small files (currently it's a single word doc)?
If I do break it into multiple files, what's the best approach: 1 file per topic (or is this a requirement)?
Finally, when I come to generate the PDF, will the files be combined. (i.e. can I have different page-breaks than I have in the RH project)?
Any pointers greatly appreciated
Regards
Mark

Hi,
First off, is access controlled at the file level?
Not sure what you mean by that. In source control, you can check in/out ever file independent. Sometimes dependent files will be automatically checked out, for instance images used in the css when you check out the style sheet.
I want to have multiple authors editing the same manual at the same time, so do I need to break the manual into multiple small files (currently it's a single word doc)?
That be the idea. Anyway, it's not a good idea to have an entire RoboHelp project in a single topic. You probably want to cut up your contents into the small chunck: topics.
If I do break it into multiple files, what's the best approach: 1 file per topic (or is this a requirement)?
In RoboHelp a topic is a HTML file. RoboHelp doesn't force you to split up content into one or more topics. If you are creating help for the web, you want the information to be organized in relatively small chunck so users can quickly scan through it.
Finally, when I come to generate the PDF, will the files be combined. (i.e. can I have different page-breaks than I have in the RH project)?
Not sure what you mean by page breaks. As RoboHelp creates HTML files, there are no page breaks such as in paper manuals. When you create a PDF, you combine the topics you need into a single document.
If a PDF is required for you, you may want to consider not using RoboHelp for your sources. A PDF created by RoboHelp is useful for internal use, but it never seems to get good enough to give to customers. Personally, when a PDF version of a manual is required, I create the manual in FrameMaker and link or import the book into RoboHelp. You can also link Word documents, so you may want to play around with that before deciding whether to use Word, RoboHelp or FrameMaker for your source.
Greet,
Willam

New user Access

How to give the new user access for Hyperion Planning application.Please provide any document for application access.

Duplicate: User access

User access

How to give the new user access for Hyperion Planning application.Please provide any document for application access.

Here is the EPM security admin guide: Overview of Shared Services Console
In particular you may want to look at http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E57185_01/epm.1112/hss_security_user_role/ch09.html

WCS Lobby Ambassador and Monitor User

I'm running our WCS authentication through ACS with TACACS and it's working fine. However, I currently have my Help Desk setup with a monitor user so they can login and view WCS, but this does not give them the Lobby Ambassador of course. How can I get a user to have both WCS and Lobby access with having to login with seperate user identities?

It's either admin either lobby account, you can not have both, the http pages are completly different and dont intermix.
Your solution is to have 2 users on your TACACS where one is the admin and one the lobby.
Here are the step by step config lines:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/wireless/wcs/6.0/configuration/guide/6_0admin.html#wpmkr1064288

END USER accessing only the Output of report

Hi,
I'm creating reports based on queries, right now we are planning to give view access to end users, but my doubt if end user hits view on the report the query runs everytime and produces the report, what I want to achieve is that the we schedule the report before night and end user will only view the PDF output the query produces by the scheduling, How can I achieve this?

So do we need to give the user access to schedule button as well? and Do you mean run report online option?
Any update please?
Edited by: user8937215 on Aug 5, 2010 7:55 AM
E

Write access to Planning application EPM 11

I have a Planning application and there are users/groups that have write access through Planning and I want to give these users/groups write access through Web Analysis.
I see in Shared Services there is provisioning for "Analytic Server Write Access", which gives them the ability to write outside of Planning (GREAT)....but I don't want the users to write to all the members they have write access to in Planning, only a select few. Any ideas?
Thx John

If you want to change the access in web analysis then you will probably have to look into updating the essbase filters.
If you do this you would have to keep rebuilding the filters after each planning refresh, can be done with maxl.
Cheers
John
http://john-goodwin.blogspot.com/

Disable User Access

We have a number of changes we are looking to implement and estimate we would need a 3 hour window to complete. We are proposing the changes be completed during normal hours of operation as it will require support from different teams in our IT department should we run into any issues. We will send a notification informing the users of the planned outage but do we have any way to disable their access so they are unable to connect at all? Our security setup controls access using a combination of team and data access profiles which would require of number of changes so I was looking for an easier solution if possible.
Thanks

Hi Pablo,
you have a lot of unanswered questions, are they all still open?
If you have solved then please close in a correct manner these threads assingning a "correct answer" and eventually add the solution if not present, read please How to close a discussion and why and Are you a responsible person in SCN?
About this issue, putting offline the appsets you're sure that no users can send data or execute packages only admins are allowed to work.
If you have management console installed you can see which users are connected and contact these to exit.
You can also prepare, useful for the future update queries to automatically backup the involved tables, exclude all the user from the teams, hoping you give the security rights to the teams and not to the users, so they will exists in BPC but without rights and when finished to restore the tables.
Regards
Roberto

Monitor user access to planning

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for