More performance problems with Acrobat 11.0.9 on Mac and Windows

Hello,
So few weeks ago we had the experience of being upgraded to the new user interfaces in 11.0.9. Thanks to people on this forum we could disable the new Sign panel and UI customization allowed the addition of the signature tools we needed directly in the toolbar, so we're good here.
Our other concern is the battery and processor time wasted by Acrobat. We have logged bugs for years and some of them have not been address while Adobe takes the time to add useless functionalities that drains our laptops batteries and suck our processor power.
There is an extra process 'acroext' under the adobe executable that is unresponsive, and the only solution is to kill Acrobat. The same happens with Reader as well.
Can we get rid of that? This is getting really PAINFUL!!!
Thank you
Jean

Hi,
I'm sorry if you experience performance issues and understand it can be frustrating.
Can you help us help you:
- What system are you running?
- What does performance problems mean? Is Acrobat still responsive? How responsive is the user interface? Navigating through pages, etc? 
We'll do our best to ensure the situation can be solved and you can enjoy using Acrobat on your computer.
Thank you,
Luc

Similar Messages

  • Printing Problems with Acrobat Pro 9.5 for Mac

    I have Acrobat pro 9.5 for Mac.  I'm using a Canon MG8150 multi-function printer.  Everytime I try to print from Arobat Pro I get an error message.  Any suggestions?  I can print my pdfs from Apple Preview; so it's not the document or the printer.

    The first problem is probably a permissions issue. Run Repair Permissions from the Disk Utility. For the second see this
    Announcement: Known Acrobat Issues under Snow Leopard
    Hide Details
    (1) The Adobe PDF Printer module does not work under OS X.6. Please see http://kb2.adobe.com/cps/509/cpsid_50981.html to find out how to create Adobe Quality PDFs under Snow Leopard.
    (2) Opening files from the finder, including files authored by Adobe applications, may not open them in the original authoring application. Omitting a file extension from the file name will increase the likelihood of this happening. See http://kb2.adobe.com/cps/511/cpsid_51110.html for more information.
    by MichaelKazlow at Aug 30, 2009 2:10 PM                        

  • Problem with syncing iPod ... Itunes and windows show errors... itunes 7...

    hey guys... since I upgraded to itunes7 my ipod (4th gen click wheel) doesnt sync poperly! it all began when I was syncing the ipod and my screen just froze a few secs after connecing the ipod! I had to restart the computer and reset my ipod... from that time had alot of trouble!
    first the screen froze immediately when I connected my ipod with the pc and later when i had formatted it with windows several times and resetted it a million times with itunes7, itunes and windows show errors (error (-124) while syncing and everything stops! I've just spent nearly two nights on that and really hope that my ipod didn't break just because of itunes7! to stay in proper english and not get that angry in letters that I am in mind--- please so help me... my ipod is everything and im a music junkey! by the way... itunes itself works perfectly... if i not sync! how peculiar that getting back to itunes6 is impossible...i tried it... does it hav a spec reason, hah!
    IBM, Pentium3 (666MHZ), FW(desire to fire), Ipod Click Wheel   Windows XP   30cm

    I tried formatting the ipod with windows! in the end of it windows says that it was not able to format the drive properly. then I click ok, open itunes, restore the ipod, try to sync again and have the problem that after a while the whole thing freezes... no more errors....just from the moment i disconnect the ipod manually from the cable, everything gets back to normal life again! I do not know what to do! do you guys think, my computer is too old or maybe my ipod's broke???
    I'm despairing people...never had problems like that until itunes7! I tried as well to close all the other working programs with the task manager... doesn't change it!
    Thx for the help!
    Christopher
    IBM, Pentium3, FW(desire to fire?)...doesn't really matter Windows XP

  • Having problems with syncing my iPod to my mac and trying to purchase a song but iTunes keeps saying "can't connect to server??

    just got a new mac- been using PC. Having problems syncing my Ipod to my mac and when i try and purchase a song, itunes says "network connections timed out"-  what am I doing wrong??

    Try a hard reset by pressing the Home button and Wake / Sleep button at the same time, keep them both pressed until the Apple Logo appears on the screen.
    This does not lose any data on your iPad.

  • Problems with Creative Video Blaster Webcam Go Plus and Windows XP SP2

    Hi,
    I have exprienced a big problem since installing Service Pack 2 on Windows XP. My Webcam Go Plus is now providing either a black picture or for a short time the correct picture but then the complete system breaks down. I've already read messages from other users, who had the same problem. So, I tried to install the new driver for "Creative Webcam" but it doesn't work. On the download page for my Webcam Go Plus there is only a driver from 2002, which I already installed before updating to Service Pack 2.
    Please help!
    Martin

    Hey I'm having the same problem, and thought that maybe we'd get more help if a few people had this happening? It won't even install for me, when the camera is almost done, the camera beeps twice to say its on and then my computer turns blue and dies. i dont really like that screen, so if anyone can fix it or tell me what to do?

  • Need help with Acrobat 11.0.9: odd interface and unresponsive on some computers

    Hello,
    We've been using Adobe Acrobat Pro for a few years now and have globally been very happy with it. Recently the quality of the product seems to have increased especially on the Mac computers.
    However we're having issues with the 11.0.9 update that just happened recently:
    1) On some Windows computers the interface on the right is much larger than it should and a new tab called 'Fill and sign' has been introduced. We worried it was an malware until we read the release notes. Is this really normal? The interface is odd and very large. Is there a way we can remove it?
    2) Also once the new module for recent files is turned ON, we experience Acrobat 11.0.9 is frozen for few seconds and on Mac laptops we've noticed that energy consumption is back while there was good improvement for the last few releases. We have mobile attorneys who use Acrobat extensively on Mac laptops and battery life is important for them. They can just turn the functionality OFF fortunately, but then the new mobile is useless and we like the normal behavior better.
    Thanks for any help!
    We have about 30 computers with Acrobat Pro on them, both Mac and Windows and about a third of them have at least one of these problems.
    Regards,
    Jean

    Yes, it's normal.  You can close it or disable it entirely.
    You should be able to disable it via the following entry in a administrator created "com.adobe.Acrobat.Pro.plist" file in the FeatureLockdown section.  The file is placed in the /Library/Preferences directory and should apply to all users.
    Here is the ETK documentation on the item:
    Lockable Settings
    bEnableFillSig
    Add to GPOSupported on WindowsSupported on MacSupported by Adobe Reader
    Top>FeatureLockdown>Services (eSign-EchoSign)>bEnableFillSig
    Data type     boolean: DWORD value > REG_DWORD
    Default    1
    Version #    10.1.2 < 11.0
    Lock Path    HKLM\SOFTWARE\Policies\Adobe\(product name)\(version)\FeatureLockdown\cServices
    Summary    Specifies whether to remove the Sign Now panel from the Sign Pane.
    Details    The Sign Now panel provides a way to sign with a typed signature and a scanned image of your signature. This method does not require certificates or the use of an online service. Possible values include:
    0: Don't show the Sign Now panel.
    1 or null: Show the Sign Now panel.
    GUI mapping    Sign > Sign Now panel
    For item #2 , I am not sure what you mean.  New module??  Can you screenshot it and post it?

  • Performance problems with jdk 1.5 on Linux plattform

    Performance problems with jdk 1.5 on Linux plattform
    (not tested on Windows, might be the same)
    After refactoring using the new features from java 1.5 I lost
    performance significantly:
    public Vector<unit> units;
    The new code:
    for (unit u: units) u.accumulate();
    runs more than 30% slower than the old code:
    for (int i = 0; i < units.size(); i++) units.elementAt(i).accumulate();
    I expected the opposite.
    Is there any information available that helps?

    Here's the complete benchmark code I used:package test;
    import java.text.NumberFormat;
    import java.util.ArrayList;
    import java.util.Iterator;
    import java.util.LinkedList;
    import java.util.Vector;
    public class IterationPerformanceTest {
         private int m_size;
         public IterationPerformanceTest(int size) {
              m_size = size;
         public long getArrayForLoopDuration() {
              Integer[] testArray = new Integer[m_size];
              for (int item = 0; item < m_size; item++) {
                   testArray[item] = new Integer(item);
              StringBuilder builder = new StringBuilder();
              long start = System.nanoTime();
              for (int index = 0; index < m_size; index++) {
                   builder.append(testArray[index]);
              long end = System.nanoTime();
              System.out.println(builder.length());
              return end - start;
         public long getArrayForEachDuration() {
              Integer[] testArray = new Integer[m_size];
              for (int item = 0; item < m_size; item++) {
                   testArray[item] = new Integer(item);
              StringBuilder builder = new StringBuilder();
              long start = System.nanoTime();
              for (Integer item : testArray) {
                   builder.append(item);
              long end = System.nanoTime();
              System.out.println(builder.length());
              return end - start;
         public long getArrayListForLoopDuration() {
              ArrayList<Integer> testList = new ArrayList<Integer>();
              for (int item = 0; item < m_size; item++) {
                   testList.add(item);
              StringBuilder builder = new StringBuilder();
              long start = System.nanoTime();
              for (int index = 0; index < m_size; index++) {
                   builder.append(testList.get(index));
              long end = System.nanoTime();
              System.out.println(builder.length());
              return end - start;
         public long getArrayListForEachDuration() {
              ArrayList<Integer> testList = new ArrayList<Integer>();
              for (int item = 0; item < m_size; item++) {
                   testList.add(item);
              StringBuilder builder = new StringBuilder();
              long start = System.nanoTime();
              for (Integer item : testList) {
                   builder.append(item);
              long end = System.nanoTime();
              System.out.println(builder.length());
              return end - start;
         public long getArrayListIteratorDuration() {
              ArrayList<Integer> testList = new ArrayList<Integer>();
              for (int item = 0; item < m_size; item++) {
                   testList.add(item);
              StringBuilder builder = new StringBuilder();
              long start = System.nanoTime();
              Iterator<Integer> iterator = testList.iterator();
              while(iterator.hasNext()) {
                   builder.append(iterator.next());
              long end = System.nanoTime();
              System.out.println(builder.length());
              return end - start;
         public long getLinkedListForLoopDuration() {
              LinkedList<Integer> testList = new LinkedList<Integer>();
              for (int item = 0; item < m_size; item++) {
                   testList.add(item);
              StringBuilder builder = new StringBuilder();
              long start = System.nanoTime();
              for (int index = 0; index < m_size; index++) {
                   builder.append(testList.get(index));
              long end = System.nanoTime();
              System.out.println(builder.length());
              return end - start;
         public long getLinkedListForEachDuration() {
              LinkedList<Integer> testList = new LinkedList<Integer>();
              for (int item = 0; item < m_size; item++) {
                   testList.add(item);
              StringBuilder builder = new StringBuilder();
              long start = System.nanoTime();
              for (Integer item : testList) {
                   builder.append(item);
              long end = System.nanoTime();
              System.out.println(builder.length());
              return end - start;
         public long getLinkedListIteratorDuration() {
              LinkedList<Integer> testList = new LinkedList<Integer>();
              for (int item = 0; item < m_size; item++) {
                   testList.add(item);
              StringBuilder builder = new StringBuilder();
              long start = System.nanoTime();
              Iterator<Integer> iterator = testList.iterator();
              while(iterator.hasNext()) {
                   builder.append(iterator.next());
              long end = System.nanoTime();
              System.out.println(builder.length());
              return end - start;
         public long getVectorForLoopDuration() {
              Vector<Integer> testVector = new Vector<Integer>();
              for (int item = 0; item < m_size; item++) {
                   testVector.add(item);
              StringBuilder builder = new StringBuilder();
              long start = System.nanoTime();
              for (int index = 0; index < m_size; index++) {
                   builder.append(testVector.get(index));
              long end = System.nanoTime();
              System.out.println(builder.length());
              return end - start;
         public long getVectorForEachDuration() {
              Vector<Integer> testVector = new Vector<Integer>();
              for (int item = 0; item < m_size; item++) {
                   testVector.add(item);
              StringBuilder builder = new StringBuilder();
              long start = System.nanoTime();
              for (Integer item : testVector) {
                   builder.append(item);
              long end = System.nanoTime();
              System.out.println(builder.length());
              return end - start;
         public long getVectorIteratorDuration() {
              Vector<Integer> testVector = new Vector<Integer>();
              for (int item = 0; item < m_size; item++) {
                   testVector.add(item);
              StringBuilder builder = new StringBuilder();
              long start = System.nanoTime();
              Iterator<Integer> iterator = testVector.iterator();
              while(iterator.hasNext()) {
                   builder.append(iterator.next());
              long end = System.nanoTime();
              System.out.println(builder.length());
              return end - start;
          * @param args
         public static void main(String[] args) {
              IterationPerformanceTest test = new IterationPerformanceTest(1000000);
              System.out.println("\n\nRESULTS:");
              long arrayForLoop = test.getArrayForLoopDuration();
              long arrayForEach = test.getArrayForEachDuration();
              long arrayListForLoop = test.getArrayListForLoopDuration();
              long arrayListForEach = test.getArrayListForEachDuration();
              long arrayListIterator = test.getArrayListIteratorDuration();
    //          long linkedListForLoop = test.getLinkedListForLoopDuration();
              long linkedListForEach = test.getLinkedListForEachDuration();
              long linkedListIterator = test.getLinkedListIteratorDuration();
              long vectorForLoop = test.getVectorForLoopDuration();
              long vectorForEach = test.getVectorForEachDuration();
              long vectorIterator = test.getVectorIteratorDuration();
              System.out.println("Array      for-loop: " + getPercentage(arrayForLoop, arrayForLoop) + "% ("+getDuration(arrayForLoop)+" sec)");
              System.out.println("Array      for-each: " + getPercentage(arrayForLoop, arrayForEach) + "% ("+getDuration(arrayForEach)+" sec)");
              System.out.println("ArrayList  for-loop: " + getPercentage(arrayForLoop, arrayListForLoop) + "% ("+getDuration(arrayListForLoop)+" sec)");
              System.out.println("ArrayList  for-each: " + getPercentage(arrayForLoop, arrayListForEach) + "% ("+getDuration(arrayListForEach)+" sec)");
              System.out.println("ArrayList  iterator: " + getPercentage(arrayForLoop, arrayListIterator) + "% ("+getDuration(arrayListIterator)+" sec)");
    //          System.out.println("LinkedList for-loop: " + getPercentage(arrayForLoop, linkedListForLoop) + "% ("+getDuration(linkedListForLoop)+" sec)");
              System.out.println("LinkedList for-each: " + getPercentage(arrayForLoop, linkedListForEach) + "% ("+getDuration(linkedListForEach)+" sec)");
              System.out.println("LinkedList iterator: " + getPercentage(arrayForLoop, linkedListIterator) + "% ("+getDuration(linkedListIterator)+" sec)");
              System.out.println("Vector     for-loop: " + getPercentage(arrayForLoop, vectorForLoop) + "% ("+getDuration(vectorForLoop)+" sec)");
              System.out.println("Vector     for-each: " + getPercentage(arrayForLoop, vectorForEach) + "% ("+getDuration(vectorForEach)+" sec)");
              System.out.println("Vector     iterator: " + getPercentage(arrayForLoop, vectorIterator) + "% ("+getDuration(vectorIterator)+" sec)");
         private static NumberFormat percentageFormat = NumberFormat.getInstance();
         static {
              percentageFormat.setMinimumIntegerDigits(3);
              percentageFormat.setMaximumIntegerDigits(3);
              percentageFormat.setMinimumFractionDigits(2);
              percentageFormat.setMaximumFractionDigits(2);
         private static String getPercentage(long base, long value) {
              double result = (double) value / (double) base;
              return percentageFormat.format(result * 100.0);
         private static NumberFormat durationFormat = NumberFormat.getInstance();
         static {
              durationFormat.setMinimumIntegerDigits(1);
              durationFormat.setMaximumIntegerDigits(1);
              durationFormat.setMinimumFractionDigits(4);
              durationFormat.setMaximumFractionDigits(4);
         private static String getDuration(long nanos) {
              double result = (double)nanos / (double)1000000000;
              return durationFormat.format(result);
    }

  • Performance problems with new Java Tiger style recommendations

    Performance problems with jdk 1.5 on Linux plattform
    (not tested on Windows, might be the same)
    using the new style recommendations.
    I need fast Vector loops for high speed mathematical calculations, some
    hints about the fastest way to program that loop would be also great!
    After refactoring using the new features from java 1.5 (as recommended from
    SUN) I lost performance significantly:
    using a vector:
    public Vector<unit> units;
    The new code (recommended from SUN for Java Tiger for redesign):
    for (unit u: units) u.accumulate();
    runs more than 30% slower than the old code:
    for (int i = 0; i < units.size(); i++) units.elementAt(i).accumulate();
    I expected the opposite.
    Is there any information available that helps?
    The following additional information I got from Mr. Shankar Unni:
    I got some fairly anomalous results comparing ArrayList and Vector: for the
    1.5-style loops, ArrayList was faster then Vector, but for a loop with get()
    calls, Vector was faster. Vector was even faster than that using
    elementAt(), which was a surprise:
    For a million summing iterations over a 100-element array:
    vector elementAt loop took 3446 ms.
    vector get loop took 3796 ms.
    vector iterator loop took 5469 ms.
    arraylist get loop took 4136 ms.
    arraylist iterator loop took 4668 ms.

    If your topic doesn't change, please stay in your original post.

  • Performance problems with EP 6 and MS IE

    Hi everybody,
    since a couple of days, we are facing a sever performance problem with our SAP EP 6.0. When I access the system with MS Internet Explorer 6.0, it takes 5-10 minutes after the Login. With Firefox Browser, the performance is ok. Therefore I assume that it must be a problem with the IE settings. Does anybody know a solution?
    Best regards,
       Michael

    There are a few things that this could be.  I've seen the setting "Empty Temporary Internet Files folder when browser is closed" cause a lot of performance problems (This is in the advanced settings in your IE).
    This will cause your cache to be cleared out each time the browser is closed and cause a lot more data to be downloaded each time you login to the system.
    For more analysis I'd recommend putting a tool like HTTPWatch into your IE browser and seeing which requests are using the most time.

  • Performance problem with Mavericks.

    Performance problem with Mavericks. My Mac is extremly slow after upgrading to Mavericks. What can i do to solve that?

    If you are still experiencing slow down issues, it maybe because of a few other reasons.
    Our experience with OS X upgrades, and Mavericks is no exception, is that users have installed a combination of third party software and/or hardware that is incompatible and/or is outdated that causes many negative performance issues when upgrading to a new OS X version.
    Your Mac's hard drive maybe getting full.
    Do you run any antivirus software on your Mac? Commercial Antivirus software can slow down and negatively impact the normal operation of OS X.
    Do you have apps like MacKeeper or any other maintenance apps like CleanMyMac 1 or 2, TuneUpMyMac or anything like these apps, installed on your Mac? These types of apps, while they appear to be helpful, can do too good a job of data "cleanup" causing the potential to do serious data corruption or data deletion and render a perfectly running OS completely dead and useless leaving you with a frozen, non-functional Mac.
    Your Mac may have way too many applications launching at startup/login.
    Your Mac may have old, non-updated or incompatible software installed.
    Your Mac could have incompatible or outdated web browser extensions, plugins or add-ons.
    Your Mac could have connected third party hardware that needs updated device drivers.
    It would help us to help you if we could have some more technical info about your iMac.
    If you so choose, please download, install and run Etrecheck.
    Etrecheck was developed as a simple Mac diagnostic report tool by a regular Apple Support forum user and technical support contributor named Etresoft. Etrecheck is a small, unobstrusive app that compiles a static snapshot of your entire Mac hardware system and installed software.
    This is a free app that has been honestly created to provided help in diagnosing issues with Macs running the new OS X 10.9 Mavericks.
    It is not malware and can be safely downloaded and installed onto your Mac.
    http://www.etresoft.com/etrecheck
    Copy/paste and post its report here in another reply thread so that we have a complete profile of your Mac's hardware and installed software so we can all help continue with your Mac performance issues.
    Thank you.

  • Performance problem with Oracle

    We are currently getting a system developed in Unix/Weblogic/Tomcat/Oracle environment. We have developed a screen that contains 5 or 6 different parameters to select from. We could select multiple parameters in each of these selections. The idea behind the subsequent screens is to attach information to already existing data/ possible future data that matches the selection criteria.
    Based on these selections, existing data located within the system in a table is searched and those that match are selected. Also new rows are created in the table against combinations that do not currently have a match. Frequently multiple parameters are selected, and 2000 different combinations need to be searched in the table. Of these selections, only about 100 or 200 combinations will be available in existing data. So the system is having to insert 1800 rows. The user meanwhile waits for the system to come up with data based on their selections. The user is not willing to wait more than 30 seconds to get to the next screen. In the above mentioned scenario, the system takes more than an hour to insert the new records and bring the information up. We need suggestions to see if the performance can be improved this drastically. If not what are the alternatives? Thanks

    The #1 cause for performance problems with Oracle is not using it correctly.
    I find it hard to believe that with the small data volumes mentioned, that you can have perfornance problems.
    You need to perform a sanity check. Are you using Oracle correctly? Do you know what bind variables are? Are you using indexes correctly? Are you using PL/SQL correctly? Is the instance setup correctly? What about storage, are you using SAME (RAID10) or something else? Etc.
    Facts. Oracle peforms exceptionally well. Oracle exceptionally well.
    Simple example from a benchmark I did on this exact same subject. App-tier developers not understanding and not using Oracle correctly. Incorrect usage of Oracle doing a 100,000 SQL statements. 24+ minutes elapsed time. Doing those exact same 100,000 SQL statement correctly (using bind variables) - 8 seconds elapsed time. (benchmark using Oracle 10.1.0.3 on a Sunfire V20z server)
    But then you need to use Oracle correctly. Are you familiar with the Oracle Concepts Guide? Have you read the Oracle Application Developer Fundamentals Guide?

  • Easier and better ways to solve current problems with Acrobat?

    Is there no better and easier way to solve the problems (installation, re-installing and crashing) with Acrobat? I really think that the ball is in Acrobat's corner right now, because I should not (for example) need to deactivate and re-activate my subscription in order to get AcrobatPro XI to work on my computer, let alone deinstalling an older version that (for now) does work, risking that in the end neither of them work. I need the (great) AdobeCloud applications to do my work as a freelancer, and I really cannot afford this kind of trouble with my applications, nore loose time repairing them. These are difficult times as it is.
    Regards,
    Marc

    Sorry, I can't. When I installed it there was no message that said I had to deinstall the old version first, and with other Adobe CC applications there had been no trouble at all, so I installed it with The previous version still on my computer.
    After installing, neither of them would start up properly, so I deinstalled version XI, after which the old version worked again, but my Adobe Application Manager does not let me download the XI version a second time, so I cannot try again.
    Regards,
    Marc
    Op 7 dec. 2012 om 00:41 heeft David Kastendick <[email protected]> het volgende geschreven:
    Re: Easier and better ways to solve current problems with Acrobat?
    created by David Kastendick in Acrobat Installation & Update Issues - View the full discussion
    The description of the issue you originally presented isn't something that I've seen happen to Acrobat when installed as a part of Creative Cloud.
    Could you provide a specific description of the behavior that occurs when you launch Acrobat XI now?
    Thanks,
    David
    Please note that the Adobe Forums do not accept email attachments. If you want to embed a screen image in your message please visit the thread in the forum to embed the image at http://forums.adobe.com/message/4902597#4902597
    Replies to this message go to everyone subscribed to this thread, not directly to the person who posted the message. To post a reply, either reply to this email or visit the message page: http://forums.adobe.com/message/4902597#4902597
    To unsubscribe from this thread, please visit the message page at http://forums.adobe.com/message/4902597#4902597. In the Actions box on the right, click the Stop Email Notifications link.
    Start a new discussion in Acrobat Installation & Update Issues by email or at Adobe Community
    For more information about maintaining your forum email notifications please go to http://forums.adobe.com/message/2936746#2936746.

  • Performance problems with SAP GUI 7.10 and BEx 3.5 Patch 400?

    Hi everybody,
    we installed SAP GUI 7.10 and BEx 3.5 Patch 400 and detected hugh performance problems with this version in comparison to the SAP GUI 6.40 and BEx 3.5 or BEx 7.0 Patch 800.
    Does anybody detect the same problems?
    Best regards,
    Ulli

    Most important question when you are talking about performance-issues:
    which OC are you working on and which excel version?
    ciao
    Joke

  • Performance Problems with "For all Entries" and a big internal table

    We have big Performance Problems with following Statement:
    SELECT * FROM zeedmt_zmon INTO TABLE gt_zmon_help
      FOR ALL ENTRIES IN gt_zmon_help
        WHERE
        status = 'IAI200' AND
        logdat IN gs_dat AND
        ztrack = gt_zmon_help-ztrack.
    In the internal table gt_zmon_help are over 1000000 entries.
    Anyone an Idea how to improve the Performance?
    Thank you!

    >
    Matthias Weisensel wrote:
    > We have big Performance Problems with following Statement:
    >
    >  
    SELECT * FROM zeedmt_zmon INTO TABLE gt_zmon_help
    >   FOR ALL ENTRIES IN gt_zmon_help
    >     WHERE
    >     status = 'IAI200' AND
    >     logdat IN gs_dat AND
    >     ztrack = gt_zmon_help-ztrack.
    >
    > In the internal table gt_zmon_help are over 1000000 entries.
    > Anyone an Idea how to improve the Performance?
    >
    > Thank you!
    You can't expect miracles.  With over a million entries in your itab any select is going to take a bit of time. Do you really need all these records in the itab?  How many records is the select bringing back?  I'm assuming that you have got and are using indexes on your ZEEDMT_ZMON table. 
    In this situation, I'd first of all try to think of another way of running the query and restricting the amount of data, but if this were not possible I'd just run it in the background and accept that it is going to take a long time.

  • There is any Performance problem with Creation of many Y or Z  Programs.

    HI,
    There is any Performance problem with Creation of many Y or Z  Programs. plz give clarity regarding this to me......
    regards
    ganesh

    Ganesh,
    Can you please mention the context and the purpose of creating these custom program.  And application are you referring to?
    Regards,
    Rohit

Maybe you are looking for