More pros and cons so far

I think the biggest issue is too much white space.
Things are a lot slower. Get the spinning ball a lot. Is this the javascript?
The right side bar needs to be re-thought, It is too short (shallow) so once you scroll down a very large chunk of the screen is white space.
This is an odd font (size choice). It is hard to read. It is either too big or too small.
I guess I really liked the old format. I use a few different help boards (pentaho, linux, macosxhints) and I always thought the apple community discussions was one of the best. It had a very tight layout. Lots of information on the screen and not cluttered or busy.
Not true now.
Whats up with the balloon framing postings? Complete waste of space.

This BIG problem now is that everything is too big and there is no way to use my full Web browser screen to display more replies and more infomation.  Right now everything is displayed with a 4.5 inches of width in my Web browser.  Maybe that's great on iOS, I don't know.  But please provide some preferences to use more width and a smaller font.  It takes too many clicks to obtain the same amount of information that I used to be able to obtain.  And please don't tell me to change my browser settings.  They are set now to display things using small text--which the new forums don't really respect.
I've attached a screen snapshot of the original posting to this threat.  It's taken using the latest version of Firefox with the window maxed on a 1440x900 MacBook Air.  Look at how much wasted space there is and how large the font is.  It's great if someone wants it that way, but give me another alternative.
Below is another screen snapshot show the Mac OS X Snow Leopard threads.  Consider how few threads are displayed at one time.  It makes visual scanning a losing proposition.  And again, there is tons of wasted screen space and the font is too large.
Please...make some changes and throw a bone to the serious users of the discussion forums.

Similar Messages

  • Pros and cons so far

    So far there are a couple of things I like about this new format, with — hopefully — more to come as I become more used to it.
    I really like having the reply box show up inside the thread to which I'm replying. It's easier to refresh my memory about what I'm saying if I'm interrupted in the middle.
    I'm finding it easy to read the various posts. I have the HD screen on my MBP, so the type on the old forum was quite small. This is better for me, though I suspect it's not for a lot of people.
    The major part of this new community idea that I am having trouble with, like so many others, is the navigation. I've gone through setting up my view, but it just doesn't feel as user-friendly and intuitive as navigation in the old forum did.
    Things I think need to be brought back:
    name of the OP in the listings
    name of the last person to respond
    location of the poster (the answer to an iPhone question coming from the UK, for example, would be different from that of one coming from the US)
    the date the poster joined the forum/community
    And, yes, I know I can get the last two bits of information from the profile page. But why do I want to navigate away from the question, find the information, and then navigate back to the question? A quick glance at the information on the question page should be all that is necessary.

    This BIG problem now is that everything is too big and there is no way to use my full Web browser screen to display more replies and more infomation.  Right now everything is displayed with a 4.5 inches of width in my Web browser.  Maybe that's great on iOS, I don't know.  But please provide some preferences to use more width and a smaller font.  It takes too many clicks to obtain the same amount of information that I used to be able to obtain.  And please don't tell me to change my browser settings.  They are set now to display things using small text--which the new forums don't really respect.
    I've attached a screen snapshot of the original posting to this threat.  It's taken using the latest version of Firefox with the window maxed on a 1440x900 MacBook Air.  Look at how much wasted space there is and how large the font is.  It's great if someone wants it that way, but give me another alternative.
    Below is another screen snapshot show the Mac OS X Snow Leopard threads.  Consider how few threads are displayed at one time.  It makes visual scanning a losing proposition.  And again, there is tons of wasted screen space and the font is too large.
    Please...make some changes and throw a bone to the serious users of the discussion forums.

  • Pros and cons in setting AD domain trust into my AD domain for more than 10+ AD domain and some with same FQDN or label ?

    Hi,
    Can someone please share what is the pros and Cons of trusting AD domain for more than 10 different AD sites into my existing single domain forest let say ParentCompany.com ?
    At the moment I only have one single forest AD domain with the Domain and Forest functionality Windows Server 2003. The main domain controller FSMO role holder is in the Data Center spread across three different VMs running on Windows Server 2008 R2.
    The main/parent company has acquired smaller business chain of 15+ offices in which they have their own Domain Controller and also their own domain, sometimes they also got the same AD domain between them (no trust or whatsoever in those 15+ AD domain).
    Sounds crazy but yes, there is no standardization in them or whoever manage their IT infrastructure previously.
    I'm now considering what are the benefits of creating the AD domain and trust versus importing those AD objects into my domain and then decommission them.
    No need to worry about Exchange Server since all of the user in those sites connecting to the RDS to my ParentCompany.com terminal servers.
    My requirements or goal are as follows:
    1. Simplify the AD domain structure & maintenance
    2. Try to avoid the disruptions of the user in terms of downtime and selecting multiple different domain everytime they login to their PC or SharePoint sites.
    any kind of help and suggestion would be greatly appreciated.
    Thanks.
    /* Server Support Specialist */

    Can someone please share what is the pros and Cons of trusting AD domain for more than 10 different
    AD sites into my existing single domain forest let say ParentCompany.com ?
    I think you mean 10 AD domains.
    Managing multiple domains can be difficult for administration. I usually recommend using a single domain in a single forest with OUs to separate resources whenever it is possible.
    However, if you can't do that then you can simply create trust relationships between your domains. The advantage is that you can enable access to resources to different domains. I do not see cons here.
    The main/parent company has acquired smaller business chain of 15+ offices in which they have
    their own Domain Controller and also their own domain, sometimes they also got the same AD domain between them (no trust or whatsoever in those 15+ AD domain). Sounds crazy but yes, there is no standardization in them or whoever manage their IT infrastructure
    previously.
    I'm now considering what are the benefits of creating the AD domain and trust versus importing those
    AD objects into my domain and then decommission them.
    I would recommend consolidating your domains into a single one. ADMT is a migration tool that you can use. The advantage would be the ease of administration. Also, by having multiple DCs for the same domain across sites, you will take benefit of High Availability
    of your and DRP.
    This posting is provided AS IS with no warranties or guarantees , and confers no rights.
    Ahmed MALEK
    My Website Link
    My Linkedin Profile
    My MVP Profile

  • Too worried to upgrade software. The pros and cons

    From a NOkia lover to others, 
    I am all for making improvements and fully understand that we can't always get it right first time every time but atm I am too concerned with the fact that updating my software will create problems that are non-existent in my eyes.
    My girlfriend updated her (my old) N70 software last week and now her phone is in the repair shop. This could just be a coincidence but....
    I had an N95 (on orange) and was stung when the "unlucky for some" version 13 was installed on the handset. See the epic thread here "N95 firmware upgrade affects battery life" (couldn't post link) 
    I carried out the full back up to my card as instructed but the games I purchased would no longer work so had to re-buy them. The battery life was killed in eight hours due to the wlan making a connection attempt as long as the battery would allow it to happen. The point is... all of this was not happening before the update. 
    It was that bad that in the end I was forced to upgrade / get a new contract before I was entitled to one from Orange and had to fork out for two contracts to get the handset spec I needed.
    I now have an N95 8GB and have no qualms with it what so ever. It has version 20 atm and pc suite informs me there is an update every time I boot the program up. So far.. I have declined to update.
    So what are the pros and cons and is it more of a risk to chance losing the licenses I have paid for and update if nothing is wrong?
    Best Regards
    SgtTrojan 
    The swordsman that goes to war thinking of saving himself had better not go to war at all.

    I myself am also worried. A friend of mine told me if there is no porblem with your current version of firmware for your phone then why update? It is not a assurance that after updating there would be no problems/bugs with the new version.My friend has a point. Why would we update if there is no problem with your current firmware version? Some would say it would be faster, there would be more improvements to the music ( which I know would be depending with your hardware and not the software).
    I am thinking of updating my firmware with a Nokia Service Center here in my country (Philippines). It is for free at the moment because my phone ins under 1 year Warranty. But I am thinking twice after what my friend told me.
    I hope my opinion helps you all out here.

  • HT204053 What are the pros and cons of 1) choosing to use the SAME Apple ID for iCloud services on one side, and purchases on the iTunes Store, App Store, and iBookstore, on the other side; or 2) to have and use two separate Apple Ids for these "two sides

    All is in the title, so I repeat it below with a better identation.
    What are the pros and cons of
    1) choosing to use the SAME
                                                  Apple ID for iCloud services on one side, and
                                                  purchases on the iTunes Store, App Store, and iBookstore, on the other side; or
    2) to have and use two separate Apple Ids for these "two sides"?
    P.S.
    I have loads and loads of free podcasts in iTunes in my iMac, that are certainly more thant the 5 gigas the iCloud provides for free, so I don't want those to go to the cloud. But this is perhaps a different question...
    Also need to mention that I have itunes on a mac, a pc and an iphone.
    Sorry to look so silly with this question, but I don't get the "big picture".

    You need to create a user account for your wife (or yourself depending on who has the current user account). When syncing, each of you should sign in as a separate user, login to iTunes and then sync. I had this problem when my sister got an iPhone. When we did her initial sync, everything on my iPhone showed up on hers. Apple gave me this solution.

  • What are the Pros and Cons while joining tables at DF and Universe level

    Hi Experts,
    I am new to Data federator designer. I need help on the below.
    Could you please let me know the Pros and Cons while joining the source tables in data federator
    And While joining the DF target tables in universe designer.
    Regards,
    Gana

    Hi,
    1. I have created target tables based on source tables with one to one mapping and then join all target tables in universe.
    Ex: Source tables: Infocube text tables, fact tables and 3rd party data base table
    Target tables:Target tables are same as source tables
    --- Yes this is the way to create target Tables  and join them in the universe.These target Tables gives you the flexibility  like in future your requirement is to add one more object based on some calculation which is not possible in the universe so that time you can create  one more column in the target table and do the calculation. at the same time if you are using source table you can not do anything.
    2. Created single target table with all objects of source tables and merged all sources tables data.
    Ex: Source tables: Infocube text tables, fact tables and 3rd party data base table
    Target table: Single table.
    --- This is bit complex structure to merge all tables data in the one target table.in this situation you have to put more efforts and it is more complex.basically this type of target table is useful when you are merging data by multiple source into single  or  creating one target table based on the  union of tables by adding two mapping rules or more and you can not join tables in universe.
    Better approach is first 1. create target tables based on the source tables and join them in the universe.
    Thanks,
    Amit

  • Pros and Cons not determining / having a Delivery Plant in Sales Order?

    Hi Mates
    Here I have come-up with one more (weired?) requirement from my client.
    We have two plants manufacturing same product and supplying to all customers (some time in same sales order with two different line items).
    At the timeof creating a sales order, marketing does't know from which plant the material will move and hence they don't want to fill the Delivering Plant field (VBRP-BUKRS at Shipping tab) for each Item.
    They are insisting me to map it as above though I had explained about various pros and cons for not determining a mandatory delivery plant
    in sales order like the requirements and shipping stuff.
    Yet, yet they want this.
    Has anyone come across this kind of requirement before? What best you had done for that?
    Can I ask you what are the Pros and cons on not having a Delivery Plant at Sales Order level?
    what if I could determine it Delivery level?
    Any comments, suggestions, replies and advices are taken humbly.
    Cheers
    Ajay Kumar Veeranki

    Dear Mahulenka
    Thanks a lot for the reply. It do have helped me.
    Yest it is VBAP-WERKS (typo error ).
    Infact I had given the same solution for the issue.
    Interstingly, they are insisting on a better solution fit for their requirement. Anyway shall 'highlight' the points again to them try to get it solved
    Just wondering has anyone faced the same situation before.
    Thanks again for the reply and good luck
    Best Regards
    Ajay Kumar Veeranki

  • What are the pros and cons of installing java+abap stack for portal?

    Hi all,
      1.What are the pros and cons of installing java+abap stack for portal?
      2.what effect it does on the ume options to be choosen??
      3.for the purpose of integration of r3,bw and crm on portal and crm 4.0 60.2.3 business package which option of stack(java or abap or both)will be good option and which ume option while installation should be choosen?
    regards
    Rajendra

    Hi Rajendra,
    The NetWeaver Installation Master Guide offers some good scenarios on the pros and cons:
    https://websmp201.sapag.de/~sapidb/011000358700005412792005E.pdf
    In a nutshell:
    ABAP+JAVA
    Pros
    - Decrease # of servers required to administer the portal
    - Less costly
    Cons
    - Upgrades could be dependent on ABAP and Java release level
    - Additional load on the server due to ABAP stack
    - Limited scalability
    JAVA and ABAP on separate server
    Pros
    - Improved performance
    - Allows each system to be single-use purpose therefore downtime does not affect other components
    - More scalable
    Cons
    - Adds complexity to landscape
    - Additional costs
    Regards,
    Thomas Pham

  • Same SID for QA & Prd systems - pros and cons?

    We have the foll systems:
    1. Enterprise Portal 7.0
    2. NWDI 7.0
    3. NW 7.0 (with XECO - Ecommerce)
    4. TREX 7.1
    5. Content Server 6.40
    6. ECC 6.0
    Currently the QA and Prd systems have the same SID and system/instance no, although they are on different hosts.
    We would like to know what are the long term pros and cons for keeping the QA and Prd SIDs the same for all systems.
    We are already making a list, so thought we might as well get more inputs from the community too.
    We already have this arrangement for the past 3 months and have not faced any major issues.
    A couple of cons though:
    1. Cannot use solman as it cannot distinguish between the diff servers with same SID
    2. ABAP transports from QA to Prd have to be manually done (cannot use STMS)
    Thanks
    Prasad

    Hi Manoj,
    Changing the SID of java systems is a very tedious procedure. Hom sys copy is just a part of the SID change...there are a whole lot of configs to be done after that...the task is eq to a new setup of systems
    For once, the efforts put in are huge..you can see there are 5 systems..besides, it will involve coordination from all teams - basis, development, functional, project management.
    Here are a few advantages that we know of:
    1. No efforts reqd to change back to original SID
    2. During disaster recovery, we just have to restore the production database on QA and change the hostname, whereas its not so in case of having diff SIDs
    3. For end-users this will be transparent because they will be using the hostname in the URL which is anyways different
    We have the same SIDs for the past 3 months and have not seen major issues, but we also would like to know from the long term perspective if there are any risks that we have not foreseen...hence we seek help from the community.
    Hope its clear now
    Thanks for your response
    Prasad

  • What are the pros and cons re using an intel iMac vs MacPro with LP8?

    I'm considering getting a new intel Mac in the near future (presuming a new MacPro will be released in the near future - maybe at the same time as Leopard). I compose largely for film and television and I am composing largely using a combination of loops, software instruments and some recorded live performance. I usually sync to a low res quicktime movie.
    I do like the idea of a simple and uncluttered work environment with an iMac, added to which there's also a degree of portability with the iMac however the MacPro is obviously more powerful. I'm not sure how much the difference in power between the two computers would affect me.
    Would I be compromising myself much if I went for the iMac over the MacPro? What are the pros and cons of the iMac vs the MacPro in relation to Logic Pro 8?

    In the world large-scale music composition using samples, loops, etc (especially for film) your two biggest needs are RAM and HD speed/access. The imac looses big time in this department (as a single computer at least) as it can only be upgraded to 4gb ram, and only holds one internal HD, and also lacks any PCI expansion for DSP cards, audio interfaces, etc.
    In generalyou want to separate your data vs applications as much as possible, to ensure both can be accessed quickly and easily by the computer. So its best to have your system software / applications on one internal HD, and your logic data (samples, audio recordings, loops) on another drive(s). You can do this with an iMac via USB, FW800, & FW400, but depending on how big your projects get, how many USB and FW drives / interfaces you use, and how much data you need to stream, you could overload the buss on the imac (not sure if it has multiple busses or not). Plus speed wise, internal SATA are much faster than external drives, and the mac pro with its 4 internal slots seems like a great choice for speed and flexibility.
    However, if you dont find yourself doing large scale projects, then you might be better off going with an imac. We just purchased one for my father and it runs great! It blows the socks off of my Dual 2.5 G5 tower in terms of CPU speed! If you run into problems running things from the imac, you could always add a mac-mini down the road to stream sample libs, as a Logic node, etc, which seems to be a much more cost effective solution.
    I hope this was helpful, but I probably just made the decision harder . In fact, if I were to start over today, I dont know if I'd go with a MacPro, or an iMac / mac mini combination. they both seem to have their advantages / disadvantages.
    Best of luck!

  • Pros and Cons of putting jspx pages under WEB-INF

    Greetings All,
    I have been using JHeadstart release 10.1.3 Prod for a while now and was generating pages in various subdirectories under WEB-INF/pages/ and things are working fine.
    However, recently I came across a post in jDeveloper forum Re: Access JSF Pages within WEB-INF directory where Frank Nimphius has mentioned that there is no sense in putting JSP files that are used with JSF into WEB-INF.
    I know that in struts world it makes sense to put the jsp files under WEB-INF to prevent the users from directly accessing them and force them to access them only via struts actions/navigation rules; but in JSF world we anyway expose the jspx names to the user and in-fact if we keep the pages under WEB-INF the url to access the pages also contains 'faces/WEB-INF/...'
    Thus, I would like to get opinion from various experienced professionals participating in this forum and more so from JHeadStart team members on Pros and Cons of putting jspx pages under WEB-INF
    regards - rutwik

    Rutwik,
    From your reply it seems that, for now, there should not be any impact on us as long as we don't upgrade to JDeveloper 10.1.3.1, as anyway the current JHS version is not certified against it.
    Correct.
    However, to be compatible with future releases of JHS and JDeveloper, will it be good to change the location of pages in our JHeadStart definitions to move them a directories above the WEB-INF etc and re-run the JHeadStart generators?
    Yes.
    Or, will the patch take care of modifying the current JHeadStart definations?
    No, Service Update 1 has a different default value for the pages dir , it is now /pages/ instead of /WEB-INF/page/, that's all.
    Also, with this patch, will we be able to upgrade to jDeveloper 10.1.3.1, which we would like to do once we have a production release?
    Yes, Service Update 1 is compatible with JDev 10.1.3.1
    Steven Davelaar,
    JHeadstart Team.

  • Using CLOB data type - Pros and Cons

    Dear Gurus,
    We are designing a database that will be receiving comments from external data source. These comments are stored as CLOB in the external database. We found that only 1% of incoming data will be larger than 4000 characters and are now evaluating the Pros and Cons of storing only 4000 characters of incoming comments in VARCHAR2 data type or using CLOB data type.
    Some of the concerns brought up during discussion were:
    - having to store CLOBs in separate tablespace;
    - applications, such Toad require changing defaults settings to display CLOBs in the grid. Default value is not to display them;
    - applications that build web page with CLOBs will be struggling to fit 18 thousand chararcters of which 17 thousand are blank lines;
    - cashing CLOBs in memory will consume big chunk of data buffers which will affect performance;
    - to manipulate CLOBs you need PL/SQL anonymous block or procedure;
    - bind variables cannot be assigned CLOB value;
    - dynamic SQL cannot use CLOBs;
    - temp tables don't work very well with CLOBs;
    - fuzzy logic search on CLOBs is ineffective;
    - not all ODBC drivers support Oracle CLOBs
    - UNION, MINUS, INTERSECT don't work with CLOBs
    I have not delt with CLOB data type in the past, so I am hoping to hear from you of any possible issues/hastles we may encounter?

    848428 wrote:
    Dear Gurus,
    We are designing a database that will be receiving comments from external data source. These comments are stored as CLOB in the external database. We found that only 1% of incoming data will be larger than 4000 characters and are now evaluating the Pros and Cons of storing only 4000 characters of incoming comments in VARCHAR2 data type or using CLOB data type.
    Some of the concerns brought up during discussion were:
    - having to store CLOBs in separate tablespace;They can be stored inline too. Depends on requirements.
    - applications, such Toad require changing defaults settings to display CLOBs in the grid. Default value is not to display them;Toad is a developer tool so that shouldn't matter. What should matter is how you display the data to end users etc. but that will depend on the interface. Some can handle CLOBs and others not. Again, it depends on the requirements.
    - applications that build web page with CLOBs will be struggling to fit 18 thousand chararcters of which 17 thousand are blank lines;Why would they struggle? 18,000 characters is only around 18k in file size, that's not that big to a web page.
    - cashing CLOBs in memory will consume big chunk of data buffers which will affect performance;Who's caching them in memory? What are you planning on doing with these CLOBs? There's no real reason they should impact performance any more than anything else, but it depends on your requirements as to how you plan to use them.
    - to manipulate CLOBs you need PL/SQL anonymous block or procedure;You can manipulate CLOBs in SQL too, using the DBMS_LOB package.
    - bind variables cannot be assigned CLOB value;Are you sure?
    - dynamic SQL cannot use CLOBs;Yes it can. 11g supports CLOBs for EXECUTE IMMEDIATE statements and pre 11g you can use the DBMS_SQL package with CLOB's split into a VARCHAR2S structure.
    - temp tables don't work very well with CLOBs;What do you mean "don't work well"?
    - fuzzy logic search on CLOBs is ineffective;Seems like you're pulling information from various sources without context. Again, it depends on your requirements as to how you are going to use the CLOB's
    - not all ODBC drivers support Oracle CLOBs not all, but there are some. Again, it depends what you want to achieve.
    - UNION, MINUS, INTERSECT don't work with CLOBsTrue.
    I have not delt with CLOB data type in the past, so I am hoping to hear from you of any possible issues/hastles we may encounter?You may have more hassle if you "need" to accept more than 4000 characters and you are splitting it into seperate columns or rows, when a CLOB would do it easily.
    It seems as though you are trying to find all the negative aspects of CLOBs and ignoring all the positive aspects, and also ignoring the negative aspects of not using CLOB's.
    Without context you're assumptions are just that, assumptions, so nobody can tell you if it will be right or wrong to use them. CLOB's do have their uses, just as XMLTYPE's have their uses etc. If you're using them for the right reasons then great, but if you're ignoring them for the wrong reasons then you'll suffer.

  • SOAP vs RFC - performance and pros and cons

    Hi,
    I have been playing around with the SAP .NET Connector 2.0 between an ASP.NET 1.1 application and SAP passing in either SOAP or RFC connection strings to the proxy classes as a proof of concept for some integration work required for our existing customer website and teh SAP system replacing our legacy applications.
    Other than issues relating to the ports that need to be opened in Firewalls between application environments can anyone provide me with any information or point me in the direction of any documentation regarding the performance differences between and pros and cons of using these two protocols?
    The impression I get is that RFC performs better than SOAP due to the XML conversion overhead inherent in using SOAP calls.
    I know that the ESOA direction of SAP means that SOAP is the desired protocal in the long run but is there any reason why one should be used in preference to the other in the scenario menttioned above?
    Sorry if there is an obvious answer and thank you in advance for any help.
    Andy

    We did a lot of load tests to find answers on how the protocol can have impact on the performance. With our test systems RFC was about 3 times faster than SOAP and the network traffic was doubled with SOAP (approx.). And it seems to me that RFC offers more parallel processes (for multithreading application), but I'm not hundred percent sure on that point.
    We used rel. 640 with Web AS, Client was .NET Connector and ERPConnect with .NET 1.1 and .NET 2.0.
    Krishtan

  • Pros and cons of using disksets for SUNW.HAStoragePlus

    Hi,
    untill now we were usign disksets for SUNW.HAStoragePlus for installing HA Oracle on both Sun Cluster 3.1 and 3.2.
    On the article ( http://www.sun.com/bigadmin/features/articles/cluster3.1_oracle10g.pdf ) with the title "Installing and Configuring Sun Cluster 3.1 Software for Oracle Database 10g HA" the author prefers using just the disk devices for SUNW.HAStoragePlus.
    What are the pros and cons of using disksets for disks you'll use for SUNW.HAStoragePlus?
    I think that if you do not need to add more than one disk to a diskset there's no need to to use disksets. So, you can eliminate a problematic layer such as SDS. What do you thnik and which option do you prefer?
    Murat BALKAS

    some more details :
    On " Chapter 4 . Configuring SolarisVolume Manager Software" of "Sun Cluster Data Service 16 for Oracle Guide for Solaris OS"
    (http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/819-2980?l=en&q=Sun+CLuster+3.2 ) SDS disksets we use for HA-Oracle installations is explained in detail.
         Our procedure to create diskset to locate Oracle files is attached.
         After reading the article, I realized that using disksets is not a
    must for filesystems to be mounted as SUNW.HAStoragePlus. If yes, I
    would prefer using the disk devices directly instead of putting them
    on disksets so that I can eliminate one for layer which is the problematic SDS layer.
         Our disk devices ( below /dev/did/rdsk/d9 and /dev/did/rdsk/d12 ) are
    disk partitions from a RAID-5 logical drive on the storage.
    * Create the disksets required for HA-ORACLE files
    root@vasdb1 # metaset -s oraset10fs -a -h vasdb1 vasdb2
    root@vasdb1 # metaset -s oraset10fs -a -m vasdb1 vasdb2
    root@vasdb1 # metaset -s oraset10fs -a /dev/did/rdsk/d9
    /dev/did/rdsk/d12
    root@vasdb1 # metainit -s oraset10fs d325 1 1 /dev/did/rdsk/d12s0
    oraset10fs/d325: Concat/Stripe is setup
    root@vasdb1 # metainit -s oraset10fs d305 1 1 /dev/did/rdsk/d9s0
    oraset10fs/d305: Concat/Stripe is setup
    root@vasdb2 # newfs /dev/md/oraset10fs/rdsk/d305
    * Change the ownership of newly created devices to use by Oracle
    installation owner.
    root@vasdb1 # chown oracle10:dba /dev/md/oraset10/rdsk/d*
    root@vasdb1 # chown oracle10:dba /dev/md/oraset10/dsk/d*
    root@vasdb2 # chown oracle10:dba /dev/md/oraset10/rdsk/d*
    root@vasdb2 # chown oracle10:dba /dev/md/oraset10/dsk/d*
    * Make required directories on both nodes for mountpoints
    root@vasdb2 # cd /global
    root@vasdb2 # mkdir oracle10
    root@vasdb1 # cd /global/
    root@vasdb1 # mkdir oracle10
    * Add directories to vfstab on both nodes
    root@vasdb2 # more /etc/vfstab
    /dev/md/oraset10/dsk/d325 /dev/md/oraset10/rdsk/d325 /global/oracle10
    ufs 2 no logging
    * Create raw deivces for using as redolog files.
    root@lbsdb1 # metainit -s oraset d312 -p d305 1025M
    d302: Soft Partition is setup
    root@lbsdb1 # metainit -s oraset d313 -p d305 1025M
    d303: Soft Partition is setup
    root@lbsdb1 # metainit -s oraset d314 -p d305 1025M
    d304: Soft Partition is setup
    root@lbsdb1 # metainit -s oraset d315 -p d305 1025M
    d305: Soft Partition is setup
    root@lbsdb1 # metainit -s oraset d316 -p d305 1025M
    d306: Soft Partition is setup
    root@lbsdb1 # metainit -s oraset d317 -p d305 1025M
    d307: Soft Partition is setup
    root@lbsdb1 # metainit -s oraset d318 -p d305 1025M
    d308: Soft Partition is setup
    root@lbsdb1 # metainit -s oraset d319 -p d305 1025M
    d309: Soft Partition is setup
    * Register
    root@vasdb1 # scrgadm -a -L -j oraset10fs-lh -g oraset10fs-rg -l
    oraset10fs-IP -n net1@vasdb1,net2@vasdb2
    root@vasdb1 # scrgadm -a -t SUNW.HAStoragePlus:2
    root@vasdb2 # scrgadm -a -j oracle10-hastp-rs-raw -g oraset10-rg -t
    SUNW.HAStoragePlus:2 -x
    GlobalDevicePaths=oraset10,/dev/md/oraset10/rdsk/d305 -x
    AffinityOn=TRUE
    root@vasdb2 # scrgadm -a -j oracle10-hastp-rs-fs -g oraset10-rg -t
    SUNW.HAStoragePlus:2 -x FilesystemMountPoints=/global/oracle10 -x
    AffinityOn=TRUE
    root@vasdb2 # scswitch -e -j oracle10-hastp-rs-fs
    root@vasdb2 # scswitch -e -j oracle10-hastp-rs-raw

  • Pros And Cons of Subforms and Groups?

    Does anyone know of any pros and cons related to how things are grouped, either via an object group or a subform? Are there any specific reasons to use groups and not subforms - subforms and not groups?
    For those who care to know a little more, not just questions...
    In designing my forms I have taken this approach:
    Groups (created by selecting Layout > Group) - I use groups for grouping simple objects (Text, Lines, Rectangles, etc.) which build the "static" portion of the form.
    Subforms (created by drawing, or "wrapping" objects together) - I use Subforms for field objects (Text Fields, Numeric Fields, Decimal Fields, Check Boxes, Radio Buttons, Date/Time Fields, etc.) which act as the "live" or "dynamic" portion of the form.
    I like this way of organizing the objects. It seems to make "sense" at least to me, and it also helps in terms of aligning objects, and so on. However, of course, it is not necessary to segregate the objects this much. So what is the preferred or recommended method? All opinions or suggestions are welcome!

    Actually, there's a big difference between using groups and subforms to relate objects to each other although if you don't use any scripting and/or data binding, you probably wouldn't notice much difference.
    Once you get into scripting and/or data binding, the use of groups and subforms makes a significant difference because groups (which are actually <area> XFA objects) are "invisible" when it comes to scripting and data binding.
    This means that if, on a page, you had 4 text fields, each named TextField1/2/3/4, and TextField1/2 were grouped while TextField3/4 were wrapped in a subform (named "Subform") and you needed to access these text fields from the context of the page, you would do:
    TextField1 OR TextField2
    because they're grouped with an <area> tag which is transparent in the Object Model. If, on the other hand, you needed to access the 3rd and 4th text field, you would do:
    Subform.TextField3 OR Subform.TextField4
    because subforms are defined in the XFA Scripting Object Model.
    The use of groups and subforms also affects data binding. That is, it affects the way XML data imported into your form is used to populate values of fields. For instance, if your data looked like this:
    <data>
    <TextField1>1</TextField1>
    <TextField2>2</TextField2>
    <TextField3>3</TextField3>
    <TextField4>4</TextField4>
    </data>
    and your form had TextField1/2 grouped into a group named "Group", TextField3/4 wrapped into a subform named "Subform" and then another TextField3/4 which were siblings to the Subform and Group objects but placed
    prior to the Subform object in the object hierarchy, importing the above data into the form would populate TextField1/2 in the Group object and TextField3/4 which are siblings to the Group and Subform objects -- not TextField3/4 which are wrapped in the Subform object.
    Now let's say your data was as follows:
    <data>
    <TextField1>1</TextField1>
    <TextField2>2</TextField2>
    <Subform>
      <TextField3>3</TextField3>
      <TextField4>4</TextField4>
    </Subform>
    </data>
    This would result in populating TextField1/2 in the Group and, as opposed to the first scenario, TextField3/4 which are wrapped in the Subform object.
    This is a very simple example to prove a point. If you think about it a little, the implications -- especially concerning data binding -- are quite large. To help illustrate this further, I've attached a sample form with the hierarchy I described earlier as well as two data files: data1.xml is the first one I described in this post, while data2.xml is the second one. Try importing both into the form to see the differences in the results and then compare the object hierarchy in the Hierarchy palette with the nesting of the data nodes in the data files.
    Finally, there's also the fact that subform instances can be created and deleted dynamically at runtime while groups cannot have instances. For dynamic forms, this is a big consideration.
    Stefan
    Adobe Systems

Maybe you are looking for

  • Flash Builder 4.7 crashes on startup

    Flash Builder 4.7 does not start anymore. System: OS X Yosemite 10.10.1 Java: version 1.8.0_25 License: Creative Cloud Membership Console output: 07/01/15 12:21:25,876 Adobe Flash Builder 4.7[19199]: WARNING: The Gestalt selector gestaltSystemVersion

  • How to add one more database to an ASM instance

    Dear Gurus, I Created an ASM Instance and Database. Now I would like to install one more database and use the ASM instance to manage my disks. I tried using DBCA, It is not detecting ASM instance not sure why it is giving the problem. Thanks in advan

  • Why does Weather Channel keep knocking me out and how do I get rid of it?

    Weather Channel comes up even though I have deleted it

  • Can't open or run downloaded files

    I can't open or run any files that I have downloaded through Firefox. I reset the profile, I uninstalled/reinstalled Firefox, I created a new profile, I changed the download location, I made a new downloads folder, etc. I think it is somehow being bl

  • Adding a new field

    Hi guru In the TC-KOB1 we are getting two field as order & order group.In addition to that we need to add another field as order type. can we do so & how to do pl. guide us. Thanks shivaji