More than 24h and my order stucks on "Processing Order"

Hi,
I´m worried about my order (removed per forum guidelines), it doesn't shipped yet (according to the site) and i need it by, at most saturday, because on sunday the person, who will bring the package, will travel back to my country. 
Could you please let me know about the real order situation? Could you send me the tracking number if it were sent?
Thanks in advance,
Maurício (removed per forum guidelines)

Hello Mauricio-
Thank you for posting on Best Buy forum, your concern regarding your recent order. I understand that it needs to arrive in a timely manner. After reviewing your order information, I noticed that you have also been in contact with our Best Buy Customer Care team. I believe Brenda has already emailed you the information you have requested.
Please check out your inbox and review the email, if you continue to have a question feel free to let me know. 
Karina|Social Media Specialist | Best Buy® Corporate
 Private Message

Similar Messages

  • It's so annoying!! I have created a new Apple ID but after I click verify it just goes back to the previous page!!! It''s really frustrating I have tried for more than 4H, and the problem is not about the apple ID. I can download apps with the apple ID, w

    It's so annoying!! I have created a new Apple ID but after I click verify it just goes back to the previous page!!! It''s really frustrating I have tried for more than 4H, and the problem is not about the apple ID. I can download apps with the apple ID, which means IMessage is the problem! I restarted my iPad, I logged in and out of the apple ID in the store, AND YET IT STILL WON'T WORK, PLEASE HELP!

    Hi Vmanfromusa!
    It sounds like you are having an issue with activating your iMessage app on your iPad. An article outlining some troubleshooting steps for this issue can be found here:
    iOS: Troubleshooting FaceTime and iMessage activation
    http://support.apple.com/kb/ts4268
    Thanks for using the Apple Support Communities. Have a good one!
    -Braden

  • Method called more than once - and dies with EXC_BAD_ACCESS error

    Hi,
    In my app, I have 4 views with their respective viewControllers. In the appDelegate.m, I provide methods that allows to switch to any of these views. Following is code for switching to the editView:
    -(void) flipToEditView {
    [self populateTheList]; // populate an array
    EditViewController *anEditVC = [[EditViewController alloc] initWithNibName:@"EditView" bundle:nil];
    [self setEditVC:anEditVC];
    [viewController.view removeFromSuperview];
    [self.window addSubview:[editVC view]];
    [anEditVC release]; }
    The view is not switched - and moreover, this method is called more than once; and the app dies with EXCBADACCESS!
    2009-08-23 14:54:40.648 iNotate[2128:20b] Album (before): x= 0 y=20 width=320 height=460
    2009-08-23 14:54:40.653 iNotate[2128:20b] Album (after): x= 0 y= 0 width=320 height=480
    warning: Couldn't find minimal bounds for "_sigtramp" - backtraces may be unreliable
    (gdb) bt
    #0 -[iNotateAppDelegate flipToEditView] (self=0x523690, _cmd=0x9563) at /Users/sam/MY_FILES/iPhone Apps/app/Classes/iNotateAppDelegate.m:116
    #1 0x00008661 in -[FirstView editAction] (self=0x546a30, _cmd=0xac94) at /Users/sam/MY_FILES/iPhone Apps/app/FirstView.m:25
    #2 0x30a4eee6 in -[UIApplication sendAction:to:from:forEvent:] ()
    #3 0x30ab0d36 in -[UIControl sendAction:to:forEvent:] ()
    #4 0x30ab11fe in -[UIControl(Internal) _sendActionsForEvents:withEvent:] ()
    #5 0x30ab0544 in -[UIControl touchesEnded:withEvent:] ()
    #6 0x30a67917 in -[UIWindow sendEvent:] ()
    #7 0x30a56fff in -[UIApplication sendEvent:] ()
    #8 0x30a561e0 in _UIApplicationHandleEvent ()
    #9 0x31565dea in SendEvent ()
    #10 0x3156840c in PurpleEventTimerCallBack ()
    #11 0x94a713c5 in CFRunLoopRunSpecific ()
    #12 0x94a71aa8 in CFRunLoopRunInMode ()
    #13 0x31566600 in GSEventRunModal ()
    #14 0x315666c5 in GSEventRun ()
    #15 0x30a4eca0 in -[UIApplication _run] ()
    #16 0x30a5a09c in UIApplicationMain ()
    #17 0x000027e8 in main (argc=1, argv=0xbffff068) at /Users/sam/MY_FILES/iPhone Apps/app/main.m:14
    Current language: auto; currently objective-c
    (gdb) continue
    2009-08-23 14:54:55.885 iNotate[2128:20b] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> populateTheList
    (gdb) bt
    #0 -[iNotateAppDelegate flipToEditView] (self=0x523690, _cmd=0x9563) at /Users/sam/MY_FILES/iPhone Apps/app/Classes/iNotateAppDelegate.m:116
    #1 0x00008661 in -[FirstView editAction] (self=0x5457b0, _cmd=0xac94) at /Users/sam/MY_FILES/iPhone Apps/app/FirstView.m:25
    #2 0x30a4eee6 in -[UIApplication sendAction:to:from:forEvent:] ()
    #3 0x30ab0d36 in -[UIControl sendAction:to:forEvent:] ()
    #4 0x30ab11fe in -[UIControl(Internal) _sendActionsForEvents:withEvent:] ()
    #5 0x30ab0544 in -[UIControl touchesEnded:withEvent:] ()
    #6 0x30a67917 in -[UIWindow sendEvent:] ()
    #7 0x30a56fff in -[UIApplication sendEvent:] ()
    #8 0x30a561e0 in _UIApplicationHandleEvent ()
    #9 0x31565dea in SendEvent ()
    #10 0x3156840c in PurpleEventTimerCallBack ()
    #11 0x94a713c5 in CFRunLoopRunSpecific ()
    #12 0x94a71aa8 in CFRunLoopRunInMode ()
    #13 0x31566600 in GSEventRunModal ()
    #14 0x315666c5 in GSEventRun ()
    #15 0x30a4eca0 in -[UIApplication _run] ()
    #16 0x30a5a09c in UIApplicationMain ()
    #17 0x000027e8 in main (argc=1, argv=0xbffff068) at /Users/sam/MY_FILES/iPhone Apps/app/main.m:14
    (gdb) continue
    2009-08-23 14:55:22.493 iNotate[2128:20b] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> populateTheList
    Program received signal: “EXCBADACCESS”.
    (gdb) continue
    What's happening here?
    Sam!

    -(void) flipToEditView {
    [self populateTheList]; // populate an array
    EditViewController *anEditVC = [[EditViewController alloc] initWithNibName:@"EditView" bundle:nil];
    [self setEditVC:anEditVC];
    [viewController.view removeFromSuperview];
    [self.window addSubview:[editVC view]];
    [anEditVC release]; }
    }<---- is this } matched elsewhere?

  • I would like to know if you go into free downloads why cannt you dowloads more than 10 and then you have to pay for them

    I would like to know if the download that are free why cann't you download more than 10 and then you have to pay for them

    If it's free, then it's free no matter how many you download. iTunes might take some time if you download more than three. I have more than 400 apps and a 50 of them are free and I don't have problem.
    Are you sure it was free?

  • My iPod classic 160gb don't copy more than 5gb , and when i try to add more ,it's delete every thing and told me to restore again !!

    hi
    my classic ipod 160 gb can't write more than 5gb , and after that it's go slowly and transfer the songs to much slow ,
    when i reject it, it delete every thing i put inside , and told me to restore the device !!
    and the loop start again ! 

    Hi!
    Make sure that you follow the steps you can find in this article: [[Where can I find my Firefox Sync Key?]]
    Your sync key should have the following format: x-xxxxx-xxxxx-xxxxx-xxxxx-xxxxx
    Avoid spaces or any additional character. Finally, make sure that in your work computer you are using the same username and passwords as the one at home, just to make sure that the Sync key corresponds to this account.

  • HT4528 my iphone 5 wont charge more than 1% and it is a real apple charger

    my iphone 5 wont charge more than 1% and it is a real apple charger

    Reset the device by pressing and holding the home and power buttons until the white Apple logo appears.
    Clean the lightning port to remove any lint/debris.

  • I just bought a refurbished MacBook air. It shows delivers march.27-28 via next day shipping  . And now it is still processing order,

    I just bought a refurbished MacBook air. It shows delivers march.27-28 via next day shipping  . And now it is still processing order.
    can I receive it tomorrow?

    It is certainly possible that you will receive it tomorrow. Apple's refurbished stock is held in many locations, and the item you have ordered may be in a location sufficiently close that shipping today could result in delivery tomorrow.
    However, the shipping estimates are only that; estimates. It is just as possible that it will not ship today, possibly not even tomorrow. All you can infer is that once shipped, it is more likely than not to reach you the day after.

  • Process Order does Confirmations and GR even after the Process order is CNF

    Not Sure why the Formatting is lost.
    Hi Gurus,                                                                               
    I am a beginner in this area and request your help.                                                                               
    We are implementing a project where the process order Confirmation in SAP ECC 5.0 in SAP PPPI module is done using xMII which call the BAPI_PROCORD_CREATE_TT     RFC.
    The customer wants to (certain times) do a final confirmation without actually completing the order e.g if the Order Qty is 100 then, they want to just manufacture 25 and then do a final confirmation, after which SAP GUI screen does not allow any Process order Confirmations against that process order.
    We are using the BAPI_PROCORDCONF_CREATE_TTRFC to do multiple PO Confirmations and GR for particular Process order. Below is a scenario
    Case 1:
    1. Order Qty =100  ( Unlimited Delivery is not checked and tolerance is Zero).
         Which means only 100 is accepted.
    2. 100 Quantities are produced and confirmed using the BAPI_PROCORDCONF_CREATE_TT (with Final confirmation value as 1 , which mean auto confirmation)
    3. Next when the BAPI confirms & GR's against the same order, the Complete qty is not visible in the COR3 status. And is visible only in the COGI transaction.
    That is expected behavior. and i am ok with that.
    Case 2: (The one with the problem)
    1.  Order Qty =100  ( Unlimited Delivery is not checked and tolerance is Zero).
         Which means only the 100 is accepted.
    2.  25 Quantities are produced and confirmed using BAPI_PROCORDCONF_CREATE_TT (with Final Confirmation value as X , which mean Final confirmation)
    3. The Confirmation and GR go through and the status of the process order now changed is CNF and the Deliverd qty is 25.
    At this point , if you logon to SAP GUI and try to make a process order confirmation you get an error messages which says the Process Order is already confirmed and no more confirmations or GR can be done against this Process order.
    4. But when you Again Run the BAPI_PROCORDCONF_CREATE_TT, it goes ahead and confirms and makes the GR for that Process order.
    The Expected Behavior should have been that this quantity is now in the COGI transaction.
    5. The Process order  allows any number of Further confirmations till the Ordered Qty and Delivered quantity are  same .
    so dear gurus I know i have written a very long doubt but would be very happy to get a response from you. I would ideally not like to enhance or change the BAPI and want to understand if I have missed some setting or parameter that I have to pass in the BAPI for the final confirmation so that once the Status of the Process order is CNF , no more Confirmations are allowed even from the BAPI.
    Thanks in Advance.
    Regards
    Suraj

    Hi Suraj,
    I am not positive, but I suspectt the problem lies in the BAPI.  It might be how you have the data set in MII, but it sounded like you are doing it correctly. 
    However there are a number of things you can do to troubleshoot your situation.
    First create a few process orders to test with. 
    Record the confirmation numbers and counters for each of the following:
    1) Do a final confirmation (for quantity of 25 instead of the 100) in CORK (or whichever transaction you are using). 
    2) Do a final confirmation (for quantitiy of 25 instead of the 100) in SE37 or BAPI in ERP using the BAPI_PROCORDCONF_CREATE_TT.
    3) Do a final confirmation (for quantitiy of 25 instead of the 100) from MII using your current transaction. 
    Review the confirmations in ERP to see if there are any differences.
    Review the confirmaitons in MII to see if there are any non visible differences (use a Tracer to retrieve the response segment from an execution of BAPI_PROCORDCONF_GETDETAIL using the recorded confirmation numbers and counters) 
    Case 1) If there are differences in the results, that should tell you how to modify your transaction to include or change the appropriate values in your inputs. 
    Case 2) If there are no differences, then it is most likely that there is something not working properly in the BAPI you are using.  It may not completely replicate the functionality in CORK (or whichever transaction you are using in ERP).  Then open a ticket, because the BAPI is not working as it should.
    Good luck,
    Mike
    Edited by: Michael Appleby on Aug 17, 2009 8:20 PM

  • Why can´t i have more than one initiator task on my bpm process

    Hi All.
    I am working with BPM 11g and would like to know:
    Why can´t i have more than one initiator task on my bpm process
    In this case, i will have two separeted process where each has its initiator task?
    Regards,
    Diovani

    Hi Diovani
    Two different processes can have different task initiators...task initiator means creation of a process instance which can happen only once

  • I have downloaded a fil on itunes through my phone and its been stuck on processing for half an hour what do i do

    i have downloaded a fil on itunes through my phone and its been stuck on processing for half an hour what do i do

    I suggest that you try to use Tiny Umbrella to kick your device out of recovery
    The link to download Tiny Umbrella is shown below
    http://thefirmwareumbrella.blogspot.com/
         On the right hand side of the link you will see links to download Tiny Umbrella
    After downloading and opening tiny umbrella, Click on exit out of recovery. Hope that works for you. If it doesnt work, try to write a detailed description of your problem and what is appearing on your screen etc and we will go from there. Good Luck

  • Planned order conversion to Process Order and Stock Transport Order

    Hello Friends,
    Help me to setup the below scenario
    We have an requirement wherein MAT1 can be inhouse produced or can also get stock from other plant via stock transport order.
    For which in Material master I have configured
    MRP 2 view
    Procuremrent Type - X
    Special Procurement - 40 (wherin the splly plant is maintained)
    MRP 3 view
    Strategy group - 40 (as it is planning with final assembly)
    But when i run MRP system created Planed orders for PIRs. Selecting Planned Order conversion only Purchase req tab is available we do not have an option to convert to production order.
    Kindly help me correcting the settings, so that i should be in a position to convert planned order either to process order or Stock transport Purchase requisition.
    Thanks and Regards,
    Chandra

    Hi Chandra,
    Stock transfer is only possible with procurement type 'F'. when you take spl.procurement type 40, its a combination of F(procurement type) and U (Spl.procurement). it will over write the procurement type ('X' in your case) in material master. that is the reason u r getting only pur req.
    if you know the proportion quantity i.e how much inhouse and how much stock transport, then use quota arrangement.
    or
    don't use any spl procurement key. define the materials in both the plants. when converting planned order to pur req. manually assign supplying plant and item category 'U'. try this.
    Thanks & regards
    Dilip

  • Error:Assign handling Unit from one Process order to another process order

    Hi Experts,
    I am facing different issues in assigning handling unit from one process order to another.
    Business process:
    1. Two similar Process Orders are existing in the system
    2. Delivery is created for first process order using LP10 for one or more components
    3. TO is created in foreground using VL06P
    4. TO is confirmed by providing in stock available Handling Unit (HU) / storage Unit details Using LT12
    5. Customized transaction is used to reassign newly created HU (created in previous step) from first process order to second process order. As a result many steps are performed in background for delinking the HU from first process order to second process order (including creation of different TOs)
    I am facing different issues in the process:
    1. Sometimes while confirming the TO in step 4: error is received as "Reservation item 0065 with material 4013959300300 does not exist" OR "Reservation item with material does not exist"
    2. If the TO is confirmed in step 4. I am facing error in step 5 as "Warehouse number  does not exist (new selection required)"
    Both these errors are standard errors and I could not find much information on them in SCN also.
    If anyone can throw light on any of them then it would be great.
    Please let me know if any additional information is required.
    Thanks
    Harsh Aggarwal

    Hi Manish
    Thanks for your response. Actually, the customized program is used only in fifth step and not till TO confirmation so that error is not related to Customized program. However, in some cases I am able to do the confirmation but the error is received in 5th step i.e. Warehouse number  does not exist (new selection required)"
    Any further guidance you can provide. I will ask ABAP to check the customized program but the error seems to be a standard error.

  • Sales order number in process order

    Hello gurus,
    Is it not possible to have  a particular sales order consume a PIR  and have that sales order number reflected in the process order (The process ord which is converted from the plnd order which is a result of MRP run after sales order consumes PIR)...
    Thanks and regards

    Dear,
    If your material has strategy type as MTS then its not possible to allocate the PIR to a particular Sales Order in the Process Order, Sales Order can be included in planning by combining strategies but having a link is quite difficult.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Vijaya Bhaskar A

  • Multi Plnd Order to Single Process Order

    We have implemented Process Industry in our organisation (PP-PI).
    Can we convert MULTIPLE planned order to SINGLE process order ? How?
    If 'No' then what is the reason behind it?
    Chintan Patel

    Thank you Mr. Shiva & Mr. Vittal for prompt reply.
    But going furhter in the scenario as under:
    1) FERT, Strategy: 20 Make-to-Order
        Ind/Collective: 2 Collective Only,
        MRP Type: M0,
        Lot Size: MB,
        Procurement: Inhouse Production
       FERT has BOM which include HALB, VERP
       HALB has BOM which include ROH & VERP
    2) Sales Order Entered
        Line: 10  FERT: 600000673    Qty: 2000
        Line: 20  FERT: 600000673    Qty:      3  (free qty)
    3) Run MPS by MD50 on Sales Order, Line Item 10
        Result: Planned Order for line item 10 is generated
    4) Run MRP by MD41 on FERT 600000673
        Result: Second Planned for line item 20 is also generated
    Requirement:
    Can we obtain only one planned order for both line items as FERT are same for both lines ?
    Chintan Patel, Gujarat

  • Can we have more than 2 "and/or" conditions in filters in advanced mode in power view?

    Hi,
    I need to check 3 conditions in filter in advanced mode in power view. Is it possible out-of-box. Can we customize the advanced mode filters or do we have some configurable options for same.
    Thanks,
    Bhawna.

    Hi Bhawna,
    I'm the Dev Owner for the filtering experience in Power View.  Sorry it took so long for me to reply.
    In the Power View Advanced Filter cards, you cannot currently add more than two conditions.  What Rhys meant about having as many AND filter conditions as you like is that because all of the filter cards are AND-ed together, you can effectively have
    more than two filter conditions by adding multiple 'LastModifiedDate' cards.
    Unfortunately this won't help you if you're looking to OR more than two conditions.
    Adding the ability to have more than two conditions in a single Advanced Filter card is something that is near and dear to my heart, but it does open questions of nesting and grouping which would need to be addressed first in order to be able to offer a
    complete solution.
    Hope this helps,
    Jeremy

Maybe you are looking for

  • Scroll bar moved layout slightly to left

    If content on ALL of my site either did or didn't require a scroll bar, the transitions when clicking from page to page would all look smooth. Unfortunately I have some pages that are short (and so the browser displays no display bar) and other pages

  • 2 OAS on the same server

    we have installed a OAS 10.1.3.0 on Linux. is it posble to install OAS 10.1.3.3 on the same server, is there any confliction? if it posible, how can I change the port number for the 2nd OAS? or will it detect the port have been used and choose diffre

  • Print labels in transaction MIGO

    Hi, I'd like to print labels every time I do a goods receipt.I think I have to edit a message but I don't know which. It seems that it could be ET01, but I'd appreciate if someone could tell me which is better. On the label I need to print: - Materia

  • Is there a  rt.jar with line number info for Debug?

    Hello, I am trying to step through a part of sun.reflect.annotation.AnnotationParser which is a part of JDK 1.5.0_12. I have access to the source code. When a breakpoint is attempted to be set in the code, the debugger i am using (Eclispe) complains

  • Dynamic report column groupings

    I'm builing an application that has a report based upon dynamic sql. It adds four columns for each store in the chain but as I don't want to redo the program everytime we add another store I am building that query string using a loop to add each extr