More than one sender structure assigned to receiver structure R_*

We are doing a time based reduction using TDMS 3.0.
At the phase called " assign domain rules", we get warning (not error):
"more than one sender structure assigned to receiver structure R_*".
I have searched SND and SMP, google as well but no thread is found for this warning.
How to fix this problem?
Thanks!

Hi David,
They basically are referring to some of TDMS tables where the data type of the header table is different when compared to the underlying child table. The header table refers to TDMS own table for which the data element has been deliberately changed to hold data from other tables as well. This warning will not have any effect. You can ignore them.
Regards
Niraj

Similar Messages

Using more than one Send connector

Hello
Is it possible to use more than one send connector? Of course it is ;-), but also whit this requirement? I have an additional domain hosted on my exchange. This domain has to use a smarthost with authentication. Now, only this two users should could use this connector. It would be cool, if there is a permission config to allow a group and deny the others or something like this... What could be a solution?
Thanks
Norbert

Hi,
Would help to know the version of the Exchange in your environment.
For Exchange 2003, please do the configuration on the send connector.
Expand ESM, Administrative Groups, Routing Groups, Connector, right click the send connector, select the Properties, in the Delivery Restrictions, please apply with the corresponding group.
For Exchange 2007, routing based on specific senders or a group is not supported in Exchange 2007 by design.
Thanks
Allen

I have 2 problems with Mail. I cannot address an email to more than one recipient. And I receive some emails more than once.

I have 2 problems with Mail. I cannot address an email to more than one recipient. And I receive some emails more than once. Can you please help?

Restart your Mac. See if that makes a difference.

Can one Communication Channel be used in more than one sender agreement?

Can one Communication Channel be used in more than one sender agreement?

It depends on your scenario...let me tell you a case where you can use one communication channel in more than one sender agreement...
If you have an RFC sender channel this can be used in any number of sender agreements....
Thanks,
Renjith

More than one sender with only one comunication channel

Hi experts.
I need to know that it is possible to make a one File FTP sender comunication channel with more than one host.
If that is not possible, how could get that functionality?
Thanks!
Regards.

Hi Alvaro,
It is not a bad idea to do a report to search in the two locations, make a job for polling and later the report call via http or SOAP to PI itself (if you need to do any map or you need file content conversion) or not to use in PI scenario (neither http or SOAP call) if you only need to move files. I only see the next disadventages:
1. It is not a standard solution. This could be problematic in a SP uppgrade or PI version change.
2. If one day your client thinks to migrate to the PI java-only version, you would need to do again this scenario.
3. If you haven't any scenario in PI or a good documentation system, this interface can be forgotten for you or by future PI technician.
4. You lose the powerful of the monitoring tools.
Hope this helps.
Regards.

More Than One Enhancement Spot Assignment to one Enhancement Point

Dear Friends,
i have to assign more than enhancement spot to one enhancement point. i am not able to do this . can anybody tell me right way to implement it.
regars,
sunil sharma

thnx for reply,
actually i have to create multiple spot for one enhancement point not multiple implimentation for one spot. i have to create more than one spot for one point.

Mail having more than one notification for each mail received

ever since I've upgraded to Yosomite X from Mavericks the Mail built in app is been acting weird. As Soon As it is connected to the internet the Mail Application collects emails n i keep on getting notifications at the top right bar for each single mail i would get minimum two notifications if not four or three. Am getting annoyed by this issue especially if ur waiting for an email n hyped about it i would be disappointed lol.
Plz if anyone has a solution for this offer you're help and it is well appreciated.

Mail preferences under Compose tab. Set which account to send mail from, or set it to use the highlighted account.
You might also verify in Mail preferences under Accounts, that each account has it's own SMTP server. Be sure the correct one shows for each account. I would also check the box to use only that server for that account, which will insure that the correct server and only that server will be used for the account. Otherwise if the SMTP server for the sending account fails, it will just switch to another account's server.

How can more than one value be assigned to a variable in ODI

Hi,
I am inserting 2 values in DB Table.
I want to get both the values in a single variable in ODI.
Pls tell me how can it be done?
Thanks in advance.

Hi Deca,
Can you pls tell me is the following code fine or not?
<?xml version = '1.0' encoding = 'UTF8'?>
<EmpodiCollection xmlns="http://xmlns.oracle.com/pcbpel/adapter/db/top/tar" xmlns:env="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/">
   <Empodi xmlns="">
      <empid>1</empid>
      <empname>ani</empname>
      <bonus>#SOA_ODI_SALARY*0.1</bonus>
      <annualsalary>#SOA_ODI_SALARY*12</annualsalary>
   </Empodi>
</EmpodiCollection>
here #SOA_ODI_SALARY is a variable which is calculating salary from a table src_ws_soa_odi having the code as select Basic_sal from src_ws_soa_odi.
Actually the problem we are facing is that this transformation #SOA_ODI_SALARY*0.1 needs to be mapped in a bpel component as its input, but when i am checking the payload of the bpel component it is showing as follows :
<message>
<properties>
<property name="tracking.compositeInstanceId" value="750014"/>
<property name="tracking.ecid" value="449b4b64fa2729cc:-5b3fd395:140c49e9de6:-8000-00000000000505cc"/>
<property name="transport.http.remoteAddress" value="172.18.22.193"/>
</properties>
<parts>
<part name="request">
<EmpodiCollection>
<Empodi>
<empid>1</empid>
<empname>ani</empname>
<bonus>3400*0.1</bonus>
<annualsalary>3400*12</annualsalary>
</Empodi>
</EmpodiCollection>
</part>
</parts>
</message>
So from my observation I can see the calculation is not taking place in ODI, so pls let me know where i am doing wrong.
Your help is highly appreciated.
Thanks,
Anindya.

Assign One Position to More than one Employee Subgroup

Dear Gurus,
Please is it possible to assign one position to more than one employee subgroup?
Secondly, I have a case here where employees in a particular cadre called Junior staff have different leave quota based on no particular criteria. This means that two people can be assigned to one position and have different leave quota based on Union agreement. If I create one employee group for all those positions who fall in this particular cadre, it would be difficult to generate their leave quota since I can only create generation rules by Seniority and age. And if I decide to create all the groups there are by the leave quota each group can get, I am still constrained by having 2people assigned to one position yet entitled to different quota. Please how do I go about this?
Your suggestions will be greatly appreciated.

Hi Rhoda,
as to your second point: a solution for this was delivered as part of the SAP customer connection program,e last year in note 816423
This allows you to manually influence the grouping of the employee to have an additional criterion to determine leave entitlement.
AS to your first point: I can't quite see, what the purpose could be. Sure, you could change time dependencies accordingly, so more than one EE Subgroup assignment could be captured. But the field is setting the default value of the same field in PA, IT0001. If there is more than one value, it cannot be decided, which one is to use. So, in that respect, it doesn't make sense. Then it's easier and better to just leave the field empty in OM and have it filled manually in IT0001.
most comoanies don't used that field in OM anyway.
kind regards
Sven

More than one employee in a position

Hi HR experts,
I've a question - Can more than one employee be assigned to a position in HR Org structure?
Thanks in advance and regards,
Asheesh Gupta

Hi,
We can do that.
Condsider a case -
For a same position we have one full time employee and one part time employee.
Full time consumes 70% of the position and part time the rest 30%.
We can have more people sharing the same position but over all percentage should be 100 only.
Regards,
Amit
Reward all helpful replies.

Adding more than one 10 digital number to Digital Life

Just signed up for Digital Life and the biggest complaint I have right now is not being able to add more than one cell phone number to receive alerts/notifications. I did chat and they told to add the following as an email: [email protected] or [email protected] and neither of them worked on two different At&t cell phone numbers!!!! My head wants to explode to think of crazy it sounds you cant add more than one number!!!! And top it off - their "workaround" doesn't work. At&t PLEASE PLEASE fix this issue. Makes NO sense at all.

I'm sorry to hear you're having issues adding additional mobile numbers to receive text alerts. The information you received is in-fact correct. Ensure you are not including dashes in the mobile number (Example: [email protected]). Also, make certain your program is created correctly to send the notification.
If you're confident you have taken the necessary steps we'd be happy to work with you on resolving this matter. Please share a little more information with us by clicking here to send Digital Life a private message. In your message please include:
Your name
Account number
Address
Contact number and the most convenient time to contact you

Methods that return more than one object.

Hello everyone,
I don't know if this has ever been proposed or if there's an actual solution to this in any programming language. I just think it would be very interesting and would like to see it someday.
This is the thing: why isn't it possible for a method to return more than one object. They can receive as many parameters as wanted (I don't know if there's a limit), but they can return only 1 object. So, if you need to return more than one, you have to use an auxiliary class...
public class Person {
   private String name;
   private String lastName;
   public Person(String name, String lastName) {
      this.name = name;
      this.lastName= lastName;
   public String getName() {
       return name;
   public String getLastName() {
       return lastName;
}So if you want to get the name of somebody you have to do this, assuming "person" is an instance of the object Person:
String name = person.getName();And you need a whole new method (getLastName) for getting the person's last name:
String lastName = person.getLastName();Anyway, what if we were able to have just one method that would return both. My idea is as follows:
public class Person {
   private String name;
   private String lastName;
   public Person(String name, String lastName) {
      this.name = name;
      this.lastName= lastName;
   public String name, String lastName getName() {
       return this.name as name;
       return this.lastName as lastName;
}And you would be able to do something like:
String name = person.getName().name;and for the last name you would use the same method:
String lastName = person.getName().lastName;It may not seem like a big deal in this example, but as things get more complicated simplicity becomes very useful.
Imagine for example that you were trying to get information from a database with a very complex query. If you only need to return 1 column you have no problem, since your object can be an array of Strings (or whatever type is necessary). But if you need to retrieve all columns, you have three options:
- Create 1 method per column --> Not so good idea since you're duplicating code (the query).
- Create and auxiliary object to store the information --> Maybe you won't ever use that class again. So, too much code.
- Concatenate the results and then parse them where you get them. --> Too much work.
What do you think of my idea? Very simple, very straight-forward.
I think it should be native to the language and Java seems like a great option to implement it in the future.
Please leave your comments.
Juan Carlos García Naranjo

It's pretty simple. In OO, a method should do one thing. If that thing is to produce an object that contains multiple values as part of its state, and that object makes sense as an entity in its own right in the problem domain--as opposed to just being a way to wrap up multiple values that the programmer finds it convenient to return together--then great, define the class as such and return an instance. But if you're returning multiple values that have nothing to do with each other outside of the fact that it's convenient to return them together, then your method is probably doing too much and should be refactored.
As for the "if it increases productivity, why not add it?" argument, there are lots of things that would "increase productivity" or have some benefit or other, but it's not worth having them in the language because the value they add is so small as to no be worth the increase in complexity, risk, etc. MI of implementation is one great example of something that a lot of people want because it's convenient, but that has real, valid utility only in very rare cases. This feature is another one--at least in the domain that Java is targetting, AFAICT.

I'm using an iPhone 4. I used to be able to send more than one picture at a time to another iPhone. Now I get messages that it cannot be delivered. What's going on?

While on vacation in Canada in July I started having trouble sending more than one pix at a time to other users. I don't recall having this problem before. Is there a limit on the number of pictures you can send via text? I wonder if I messed up some settings while I was in Canada. I had things set so that I could not receive phone calls so I wouldn't get charged. Could I have messed up text / multimedia settings as well?

We want your phone working just as well now as it did before your trip, sngbrd9. Are you trying to send the pictures to other Apple users using iMessage or are they being sent through MMS/picture messaging? Are you able to send pictures one at a time to those same contacts without an error? Did you change any settings in your camera to have HDR now instead of a slightly lower resolution with a smaller file size?
JenniferH_VZW
Follow us on Twitter www.twitter.com/vzwsupport

E-Mail not send when relevant BP is in more than one partner function

Dear all,
i am facing an big issue.
My e-mail action does not work if the bp of the recipient is stored in more than one partner function in this incident.
Is this a know bug ? What can i do about that?
Best Regards
Daniel
Edited by: Daniel Titze on Feb 15, 2012 12:58 PM

Hi, Daniel.
I didn't met such a problem, but I happened to find this Knowledge Base Article (note №1521582 "Solution Manager: no mail is sent to processor of the message if sender and receiver are the same"):
https://websmp130.sap-ag.de/sap(bD1ydSZjPTAwMQ==)/bc/bsp/sno/ui_entry/entry.htm?param=69765F6D6F64653D3030312669765F7361706E6F7465735F6E756D6265723D3135323135383226
Hope it will be helpful.

How to fix "More than one receiving system has been specified for the BAPI"

Due to patching the HR system I am testing the functionalities in our test environment before patching the production system. When doing a hiring action (in our test environment) I get this error message at infotype 0000 when I try to save:
"More than one receiving system has been specified for the BAPI (AcctngServices, CheckAccountAssignment)"
It is message no. B1811
My first suggestion weas that it could be the presence of dual connections in SALE, but disabling one of them didn't help.
Since the Basis team is currently patching the HR system I wonder if that has any affect that might end out in the above error.
Anyone who can help me out here? Please?

Usually, when you have HR and FI on separate boxes, certain FI information (e.g. cost center) do not physically locate on HR box. Instead of replicating these data into HR for integrity check, you have an option (for a few countries) of remotely connecting from HR box to FI to do these checking though BAPI. I think this is the scenario you have (i.e. when doing the hiring, a new ee will be assigned to a personnel area which in turn default a cost center which SAP would need to check for integrity).
Please go into distribution model, and check if for some reason, this is set up to go to to more than 1 destination for HR accounting integrity check.
Rgds.
Edited by: Ted Dinh on Jun 12, 2009 8:55 AM

More than one sender structure assigned to receiver structure R_*

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for