MOSS 2007 gives cross browser compatabity issue on firefox and chrome and also in higher version of IE (9 & 11)

I am getting browser compatablity issue when MOSS 2007 is used on IE 9 & 11 and on other browsers like firefox and chrome.
I also face issue while using the latest version of third party Intersoft WebUI 2014 R2 controls. Although the older version of Intersoft WebUI 2008 controls were working fine with MOSS in IE7 browser. But recently WebGrids are not loading
properly and the WebCombo dropdowns doesn't work. After apporaching the Intersoft on tis issue they said their latest version of Intersoft is compatible with MOSS 2007.
In this process of upgrade I learnt that the Intersoft Sample which comes with their setup can be run on Visual Studio 2010 and above. So I would like to know whether MOSS 2007 support VS 2010 or not.
Accepting response on my queries.

You've posted this in the wrong forum. 2007 questions should go into the SharePoint legacy forum.
This thread discussed 2007 browser support:
https://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/a3131e1f-b78b-46bd-bc46-750866b280bd/sharepoint-2007-ie-browser-compatability
Visual Studio 2010 will let you build tools for SharePoint 2007 however I'm not familiar with what you're trying to do or what intersoft webui does.

Similar Messages

Cross Browser/OS issue?

Hi there,
This website belongs to our school project and we are getting reports from the teacher assistance and the professor that the website is not funcationing properly. They are saying the menu on the bottom of the page is not showing so they cant navigate the site.
http://tvbw.businesscatalyst.com/
Can someone direct me on how we can solve this issue? I have done cross browser check and on some site it doesnt show while on other site they are showing the menu!
Thank you for your help in advanced.

that fixed the issue...which is weird since i was getting response from freind with both mac or windows tell me different things...

Work around technique for imcompatibility issues between Firefox 6.0 and Avast Free Antivirus 6.0, esp "Unresponsive Scripts."

I am using Firefox 6.0, Avast Free Anti-Virus 6.0 and Windows XP.
I am experiencing slow/freezing web browsing after a recent upgrade to Firefox 6.0. Not all but on most occasions, I also get a warning from Avast of an "unresponsive script." I suspect there is a compatibility issue between these versions of Firefox and Avast--are they any short and/or long term solutions to this. I suppose I can disable the Script Blocker on Avast but that would defeat the purpose of having an anti-virus program.
Many thanks in advance.

I have had a similar problem with my system. I just recently (within a week of this post) built a brand new desktop. I installed Windows 7 64-bit Home and had a clean install, no problems. Using IE downloaded an anti-virus program, and then, because it was the latest version, downloaded and installed Firefox 4.0. As I began to search the internet for other programs to install after about maybe 10-15 minutes my computer crashes. Blank screen (yet monitor was still receiving a signal from computer) and completely frozen (couldn't even change the caps and num lock on keyboard). I thought I perhaps forgot to reboot after an update so I did a manual reboot and it started up fine.
When ever I got on the internet (still using firefox) it would crash after anywhere between 5-15 minutes. Since I've had good experience with FF in the past I thought it must be either the drivers or a hardware problem. So in-between crashes I updated all the drivers. Still had the same problem. Took the computer to a friend who knows more about computers than I do, made sure all the drivers were updated, same problem. We thought that it might be a hardware problem (bad video card, chipset, overheating issues, etc.), but after my friend played around with my computer for a day he found that when he didn't start FF at all it worked fine, even after watching a movie, or going through a playlist on Youtube.
At the time of this posting I'm going to try to uninstall FF 4.0 and download and install FF 3.6.16 which is currently on my laptop and works like a dream. Hopefully that will do the trick, because I love using FF and would hate to have to switch to another browser. Hopefully Mozilla will work out the kinks with FF 4 so I can continue to use it.
I apologize for the lengthy post. Any feedback would be appreciated, but is not necessary. I will try and post back after I try FF 3.16.6.

Is anyone else having issues with firefox checking toolbars and add ons every time you log on after upgrading to 10.0.2

I upgraded to the newest Firefox 10.0.2 a few days ago and now every time I log onto the internet with Firefox it says checking tool-bars and addons and loads slowly with my homepage and Firefox page saying thanks for upgrading anyone else having this issue have 2 tool bars that load they are charter and yahoo

Which security software (firewall, anti-virus) do you have?
Some security software has virtualization features that can cause problems by protecting and restoring files in the Firefox profile folder.

.xbap file not opening in web browser(IE and Chrome) and just keep on downloading it

i have developed small XBAP application and trying to run (F5)
Problem is when i trying to run the Application,
its keep on downloading it (.xbap file ) and i can't see an application on Web browser even though i am developing in the local machine with .net 4.5 is installed and all necessary setting in the Internet option done.
[i just added one button in one page and not much code i have written]
i tried all the solution which i can get it from Google :-( but still failed.
Please provide me the proper solution.

You have to register the WPF Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions (MIME) types and file name extensions on the web server if you haven't already done so. Please refer to the following page for more information about how to do this:
https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/vstudio/ms752346(v=vs.100).aspx
If you are using another browser than Internet Explorer you will need to install a plugin:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7337155/how-can-i-get-my-xbap-to-run-in-my-browser-instead-of-downloading-it-on-windows
https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/How%20to%20enable%20and%20disable%20Windows%20Presentation%20Foundation
...but XBAP generally don't tend work that well in other browsers than IE.
Also make sure that you have enabled the "XAML browser applications" option under Internet Options->Security-> Custom level in IE:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/17261858/run-wpf-application-in-browser
Hope that helps.
Please remember to close your threads by marking helpful posts as answer and please start a new thread if you have a new question.

There is a compatability issue between Firefox 5.0 and Java on Mac computers. How can I uninstall Firefox 5.0 and install a previous version of Firefox?

I cannot find a previous version of Firefox to install. Please tell me how to get it. Thank you

https://support.mozilla.com/en-US/questions/844734

Firefox will not render the font "maximo" correctly in the browser. It renders correctly in Chrome and Safari. Why is this?

I am designing a website and having difficulty with @fontface in Firefox only. Font is "maximo" and is a ttf. It renders perfectly in Chrome and Safari but will not do so in Firefox. I changed my firefox preferences to allow pages to choose their own fonts and wonder if there is something I am missing. When I checked the Tools menu drop down and opened the inspector, the inspector shows that the font is rendering as Helvetica. I am using a mac and running OS X 10.9.5. I would be happy to send screenshots.

It is possible that there is a problem with the file(s) that store the extensions registry.
Delete the extensions.* files (e.g. extensions.json, extensions.sqlite, extensions.ini) and compatibility.ini in the Firefox profile folder to reset the extensions registry.
*https://support.mozilla.org/kb/Profiles
New files will be created when required.
See "Corrupt extension files":
*http://kb.mozillazine.org/Unable_to_install_themes_or_extensions
*https://support.mozilla.org/kb/Unable+to+install+add-ons
If you see disabled or not compatible extensions in "Firefox/Tools > Add-ons > Extensions" then click the Tools button at the left end of the Search bar to check if there is a compatibility update available.
There is software like Advanced SystemCare with its Surfing Protection feature that can protect files in the Firefox profile folder against changes.
If you have such software then check the settings or uninstall this software.
Boot the computer in Windows Safe Mode with network support (press F8 on the boot screen) as a test.
*http://www.bleepingcomputer.com/tutorials/how-to-start-windows-in-safe-mode/

Are there any compatibility issues between Firefox 6-beta and Norton internet security?

I received a warning before installing it that Firefox 6-beta is incompatible with the Norton toolbar - does this imply any deeper compatibility problems with Norton?

That "test" only implies a number is incorrect in the add-on, nothing more should be read into that message.
Norton, and many other security software vendors, don't usually support pre-release Beta version web browsers. Firefox only checks the '''maxVersion''' specified in the install.rdf file for the extension that is installed in Firefox, which is a very minor point as far as "compatibility" goes, and that is "set" by the developer of the add-on. The burden for true compatibility is on the developer.

Which one of this is the fastest browser among each other - Firefox, Opera, Chrome

I ran 2 Diff benchmark (Futuremark n Rightware) on Firefox Chrome n Opera 2 c which 1 is d fastest n guess wat Not only Chrome is d fastest but Firefox is d slowest. Checkout the screenshot of the benchmark @ http://i1105.photobucket.com/albums/h348/sajdude/benchmark.jpg Regards Saj

yes this will just move the tabbar to the place you're used to from old versions.

Old Macromedia - Adobe cross platform font issues

This message is more directed to Adobe.
I am aware that currently OpenType fonts are cross platform compatible but only with Illustrator, Photoshop and InDesign.
However, my primary workspace is Fireworks-Flash. There are serious cross platform issues with fonts - I have looked at truetype, postscript and opentype and they all have issues translating onto PC - many of the styles are not available.
In our studio I design on Mac but our Flash developers are on PC - our final renders and review renders always need to happen on Mac as a result of this cross platform issue. This is a little inefficient.
When is Adobe planning on resolving this issue?

"I am aware that currently OpenType fonts are cross platform
compatible but only with Illustrator, Photoshop and InDesign."
No, they are fully cross-platform compatible. The Adobe products you
mention, along with a very few others, are the only applications
capable of taking full advantage of the advanced features available in
some opentype fonts. And even the three products you mention don't all
necessarily support open-type in the same way.
"However, my primary workspace is Fireworks-Flash. There are serious
cross platform issues with fonts - I have looked at truetype,
postscript and opentype and they all have issues translating onto PC -
many of the styles are not available."
If you are using the same application version on both platforms, you
should have identical functionality. If you're using an older version
of Fireworks.
The only cross-platform style issue with TT or T1 fonts is that
Windows doesn't recognize any styles other than Regular, Bold, Italic,
and Bold Italic. Also, there's a font menu difference between MacOS
and Windows. Mac display all available styles, whereas Windows only
displays the family name, and you have to select the variants from
somewhere else (typically "B" "I" "U" buttons). SOME font families
from some vendors use the style function to define such variants as
Small Caps, Light, etc. MS products get ... confused.
"In our studio I design on Mac but our Flash developers are on PC -
our final renders and review renders always need to happen on Mac as a
result of this cross platform issue. This is a little inefficient."
If you're using different applications for design and rendering, and
their functionality is different, then you have a cross-application
compatibility issue. You didn't mention what applications or versions
are involved.
"When is Adobe planning on resolving this issue?"
It may be more a Microsoft issue than an Adobe issue. In addition to
the style limitations, There are no MS products that yet support
open-type features.
Although Adobe personnel do sometimes visit here, this is not a
"talk-to-Adobe' forum. Since your problem is application related, I'd
suggest taking it to the appropriate application forumsFireworks
General Discussion looks right.
And, as Bob said, you might also contact Adobe support directly with
your concerns.

I have a basic applet method timing problem with Firefox (and Chrome), not IE nor Opera. Works if JavaScript issues windows.alert() prior, fails otherwise.

I have an applet method, which is invoked from a JavaScript function, that is triggered by the window.onload event. The problem seems to center in the loading of the applet and its methods.
If I step through the 3 applet acceptance prompts (I chose to use a down-level Java), the applet method is never invoked, nor is an exception raised. How this happens is beyond my understanding.
As additional information, the Init(), start(), and "desired" Java methods all use the synchronized keyword. This is an attempt to minimize the exposure to a multi-thread environment.
If I issue a message from JavaScript (via window.alert()) PRIOR to invoking the method, I can get the desired results in special circumstances:
1) When the alert is presented, Firefox also prompts, SIMULTANEOUSLY, to block/continue the applet (the first of the 3 applet acceptance prompts). I can accept that these are separate threads.
2a) If I walk through the 3 applet acceptance prompts FIRST, and then hit the OK button on the alert message SECOND, I get the desired results, my applet method executes, and all is well (other than the fact that I would prefer not to have the alert in place at all).
2b) If I hit the OK button on the alert message FIRST, and then walk through the 3 applet acceptance prompts SECOND, I get the same results as when the page loads WITHOUT the alert, which is the applet method is never invoked, nor is an exception raised. Weird, huh?
The above problem only occurs when the browser and the applet's URL are loaded for the first time.
Subsequent invocations (after the page & applet has been loaded initially) do not have the failing symptoms.
It is my understanding that IE and Firefox (and Chrome and Opera, for that matter) each use the same implementation of JavaScript provided by Microsoft. Please correct me if this information is inaccurate.
The failing page and it's applet are proprietary; I cannot provide the Internet URL, nor the Java or JavaScript source, to aid in your analysis.

I can speak to the source code, but have no access to it.
The current process/thread that invokes an applet method must check to see that the applet is not currently being loaded by another process/thread. If it is being loaded, the current process/thread should block until the load is complete, THEN attempt to invoke the applet method.
Please forward my concern to a knowledgable developer. The nature of the problem, once identified, can be addressed in a very straightforward manner.

HTML Coding issues with Firefox

Hi!
Im currently doing a website for one of my clients, but ive stumbled upon a problem Im hoping you guys help me solve.
The website im creating is being done from scratch in semantic html for html5 and css3 validation. Sizes of all boxes are being stablished in "em" (16px=1em) as it´ll be a responsive website. The width for my website is of 1060px or 66.25em, in other browsers i see it working ok (Chrome, IE), but in Firefox when the value is stated in "em", all boxes appear to be smaller, like 5% or 8% total. When I replace the value to the one in pixels it displays them still smaller but now moved to the left, like 5% or 8% to the left.
I'm not using any type of kits for this website as it is being done from zero to accomodate our customer's needs.
My question regarding that is to know if the "em" value has been modified in recent versions of the browser or if I need some type of mozkit to have the values recognized as they should in standard sizes.

I know, it's been really odd. Whenever I'm creating a site I always take into account how it behaves in Firefox since Chrome and IE let too many things go unnoticed or let them pass without a single error in the console.
Funny thing is this is a first Ive encountered, and my browser had just updated itself to the version 24, so I thought maybe they changed something in it that may be conflicting with my site. In my desperation (the deadline for the site), Ive tried many things and the last one I thought might work was changing the percentage; but i recalled a problem I had several months ago with another site where Firefox and IE respected the margin: 0 and padding: 0 but Chrome kept getting heritage from somewhere we couldnt pinpoint since there were no errors but everything was scrambled.
It was a site we were asked to update, so it wasnt ours from the beginning, hence the difficulty pinpointing the heritage but no consoles showed it. Finally someone thought of changing the percentage of the parent one and it solved it, to be honest with you I still dont know what happened to tht one, but I thought maybe it could apply in this scenario, apparently it did.

Cross browser issue?

hello,
I have a flex image app here:
http://brandonandpatty.com/?page_id=6.
Works fine in firefox 3.0.4 and Opera 9.27. However, there is a
strange issue in IE and Chrome - the thumbnail images show up fine,
but when you click one to display a larger image it gives a broken
image link icon.
I have no idea why the browser would have influence in how
the flashplayer accesses remote image files, but it does in this
case somehow. Any ideas on how to fix this issue, or has someone
had a similar problem? Thank you in advance!

If you enabled "View Source" it might be easier to figure
out.
"bmilesp" <[email protected]> wrote in
message
news:gh9k9l$j87$[email protected]..
> hello,
>
> I have a flex image app here:
http://brandonandpatty.com/?page_id=6.
Works
> fine in firefox 3.0.4 and Opera 9.27. However, there is
a strange issue in
> IE
> and Chrome - the thumbnail images show up fine, but when
you click one to
> display a larger image it gives a broken image link
icon.
>
> I have no idea why the browser would have influence in
how the flashplayer
> accesses remote image files, but it does in this case
somehow. Any ideas
> on how
> to fix this issue, or has someone had a similar problem?
Thank you in
> advance!
>

Css cross browser issue

i have laid out my template using css, but notice that one of
my columns will bump down under another one if the screen is
resized in IE (on pc, v.6). can someone take a quick look at my
code and css and let me know what i can do to ensure that
everything will stay where it is supposed to be located, while
still using width equal to a % so that it will resize with screen
resize.
my template can be found at: www.thedunch.com/template.html
my css can be founds at: www.thedunch.com/css/dunch.css
thanks in advance for any help

If you enabled "View Source" it might be easier to figure
out.
"bmilesp" <[email protected]> wrote in
message
news:gh9k9l$j87$[email protected]..
> hello,
>
> I have a flex image app here:
http://brandonandpatty.com/?page_id=6.
Works
> fine in firefox 3.0.4 and Opera 9.27. However, there is
a strange issue in
> IE
> and Chrome - the thumbnail images show up fine, but when
you click one to
> display a larger image it gives a broken image link
icon.
>
> I have no idea why the browser would have influence in
how the flashplayer
> accesses remote image files, but it does in this case
somehow. Any ideas
> on how
> to fix this issue, or has someone had a similar problem?
Thank you in
> advance!
>

Permissions issue in moss 2007

Hi ,
I have site collection under that couple of subsites as well, there are different SP group foreach subsite. the group permission level is Contribute. permissions were broken from parent. from one subsite group one of the user
is suddenly not getting the edit permissions, other people belongs to same group they were able to edit.
I verified all the groups users and permission, the user not exists any other group, it is only under required subsite group.
Please help for this.
Regards
Veerendra Patil
Veerendra Patil

You may also need to change the IIS time out settings and make some changes to the actual web.config files of each web application you have.
These are pretty well documented here
http://blogs.technet.com/b/praveenh/archive/2012/11/16/issues-with-uploading-large-documents-on-document-library-wss-3-0-amp-moss-2007.aspx
Steven Andrews
SharePoint Business Analyst: LiveNation Entertainment
Blog: baron72.wordpress.com
Twitter: Follow @backpackerd00d
My Wiki Articles:
CodePlex Corner Series
Please remember to mark your question as "answered" if this solves (or helps) your problem.

MOSS 2007 gives cross browser compatabity issue on firefox and chrome and also in higher version of IE (9 & 11)

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for