Most efficient way from FCP to DVD? Encode when?

I know this is a frequent question, but new options in FCP 5, Compressor, and DVDSP have made a confusing process even more so. Once I've edited something in FCP, what is the highest quality way to get that into DVDSP? Export as QT, import into DVDSP, then encode? Export with QT Conversion? With which settings? Export using Compressor, then import already encoded files into DVDSP? Any advice would be greatly appreciated! Thanks.

I always export QuickTime Movie, current settings. Whether or not you click self contained depends on how long you want the file to be valid. Then I import that into DVDSP and let it do the encoding. Simple. Good results.
Patrick

Similar Messages

QUICKEST way from FCP to DVD

I need to know the quickest way to get a movie in FCP onto a DVD. What I normally do is convert the file to Quicktime, and then put that into I-DVD. The problem right now is that just converting the movie to Quicktime is taking 6 hours. Is there another way? My movie is one hour long. I have about 5 and a half hours to get it done. I hope someone can help me!
-Angela

When you're converting to Quicktime, are you creating a 'self-contained movie' or a reference movie. If you deselect 'make self-contained' the export will happen MUCH quicker (referencing the media that exists on your computer)
This should work in iDVD as long as you have all the original media on your computer. Bear in mind, once any piece of media is gone, including a render, you will loose this ability with a non self-contained file.
K

Most efficient way to delete "removed" photos from hard disk?

Hello everyone! Glad to have this great community to come to for help. I searched for this question but came up with no hits. If it's already been discussed, I apologize and would love to be directed to the link.
My wife and I have been using LR for a long time. We're currently on version 4. Unfortunately, she's not as tech-savvy or meticulous as I am, and she has been unknowingly "Removing" photos from the LR catalogues when she really meant to delete them from the hard disk. That means we have hundreds of unwanted raw photo files floating around in our computer and no way to pick them out from the ones we want! As a very organized and space-conscious person, I can't stand the thought. So my question is, what is the most efficient way to permanently delete these unwanted photos from the hard disk
I did fine one suggestion that said to synchronize the parent folder with their respective catalogues, select all the photos in "Previous Import," and delete those, since they will be all of the photos that were previously removed from the catalogue.
This is a great suggestion, but it probably wouldn't work for all of my catalogues since my file structure is organized by date (the default setting for LR). So, two catalogues will share the same "parent folder" in the sense that they both have photos from May 2013, but if I synchronize May 2013 with one, then it will get all the duds PLUS the photos that belong in the other catalogue.
Does anyone have any suggestions? I know there's probably not an easy fix, and I'm willing to put in some time. I just want to know if there is a solution and make sure I'm working as efficiently as possible.
Thank you!
Kenneth

I have to agree with the comment about multiple catalogs referring to images that are mixed in together... and the added difficulty that may have brought here.
My suggestions (assuming you are prepared to combine the current catalogs into one)
in each catalog, put a distinctive keyword onto all the images so that you can later discriminate these images as to which particular catalog they were formerly in (just in case this is useful information later)
as John suggests, use File / "Import from Catalog" to bring all LR images together into one catalog.
then in order to separate out the image files that ARE imported to LR, from those which either never were / have been removed, I would duplicate just the imported ones, to an entirely separate and dedicated disk location. This may require the temporary use of an external drive, with enough space for everything.
to do this, highlight all the images in the whole catalog, then use File / "Export as Catalog" selecting the option "include negatives". Provide a filename and location for the catalog inside your chosen new saving location. All the image files that are imported to the catalog will be selectively copied into this same location alongside the new catalog. The same relative arrangement of subfolders will be created there, for them all to live inside, as is seen currently. But image files that do not feature in LR currently, will be left behind by this operation.
your new catalog is now functional, referring to the copied image files. Making sure you have a full backup first, you can start deleting image files from the original location, that you believe to be unwanted. You can do this safe in the knowledge that anything LR is actively relying on, has already been duplicated elsewhere. So you can be quite aggressive at this, only watching out for image files that are required for other purposes (than as master data for Lightroom) - e.g., the exported JPG files you may have made.
IMO it is a good idea to practice a full separation of image files used in your LR image library, from all other image files. This separation means you know where it is safe to manage images freely using the OS, vs where (what I think of as the LR-managed storage area) you need to bear LR's requirements constantly in mind. Better for discrete backup, too.
In due course, as required, the copied image files plus catalog can be moved bodily to another drive (for example, if they have been temporarily put on an external drive, and you want to store them on your main internal one again). This then just requires a single re-browsing of their parent folder's location, in order to correct LR's records inside this catalog, as to the image files' changed addresses.
If you don't want to combine the catalogs into one, a similar set of operations as above, can be carried out for each separate catalog you have now. This will create a separate folder structure in each case, containing just those duplicated image files. Once this has been done for all catalogs, you can start to clean up the present image files location. IMO this is very much the laborious and inflexible option, so far as future management of the total body of images is concerned... though there may still be some overriding reason for working that way.
RP

Most efficient way to get a connection from a defined connection -pool [whole message]

Having recently load-tested the application we are developing I noticed that
one of the most expensive (time-wise) calls was my fetch of a db-connection
from the defined db-pool. At present I fetch my connections using :
private Connection getConnection() throws SQLException {
try {
Context jndiCntx = new InitialContext();
DataSource ds =
(DataSource)
jndiCntx.lookup("java:comp/env/jdbc/txDatasource");
return ds.getConnection();
} catch (NamingException ne) {
myLog.error(this.makeSQLInsertable("getConnection - could not
find connection"));
throw new EJBException(ne);
In other parts of the code, not developed by the same team, I've seen the
same task accomplished by :
private Connection getConnection() throws SQLException {
return DriverManager.getConnection("jdbc:weblogic:jts:FTPool");
From the performance-measurements I made the latter seems to be much more
efficient (time-wise). To give you some metrics:
The first version took a total of 75724ms for a total of 7224 calls which
gives ~ 11ms/call
The second version took a total of 8127ms for 11662 calls which gives
~0,7ms/call
I'm no JDBC guru som i'm probably missing something vital here. One
suspicion I have is that the second call first find the jdbc-pool and after
that makes the very same (DataSource)
jndiCntx.lookup("java:comp/env/jdbc/txDatasource") in order to fetch the
actual connection anyway. If that is true then my comparison is plain wrong
since one call is part of the second. If not, then the second version sure
seems a lot faster.
Apart from the obvious performance-differences in the two above approaches,
is there any other difference one should be aware of (transaction-context
for instance) between the two ? Basically I'm working in an EJB-environment
on weblogic 7.0 and looking for the most efficient way to get hold of a
db-connection in code. Comments anyone ?
//Linus Nikander - [email protected]

Linus Nikander wrote:
Thank you for both your replies. As per your suggestions I've improved my
connectionhandling (I ended up implementing the Service Locator pattern as a
matter of fact).
One thing still puzzles me though. Which (and why) is the "proper" way to
fetch the actual dataSource. As I stated before in the code I've seen two
approaches within the code I've got.
1. myDs = myServiceLocator.getDataSource("jdbc:weblogic:jts:FTPool");
2. myDs = myServiceLocator.getDataSource("java:comp/env/jdbc/tgsDB");
where getDataSource does a dataSource = (DataSource)
initialContext.lookup(dataSourceName); dataSourceName being the input-string
obviously.
tgsDB is defined as
<reference-descriptor>
<resource-description>
<res-ref-name>jdbc/tgsDB</res-ref-name>
<jndi-name>tgs-dataSource</jndi-name>
</resource-description>
</reference-descriptor>
in weblogic-ejb-jar.xml
From what I can understand by your answer, you don't recommend using the
JNDI-lookup way of getting the connection at all ?Correct.
The service locator that
I implemented will still perform a JNDI lookup, but only once. Will the fact
that I'm talking to an RMI-object anyway significantly impact performance
(when compared to you non-jndi-method) ?In some cases, for earlier 7.0s, maybe yes. For the very latest, it shouldn't
hurt.
>
>
In my two examples above. If i use version 1. How will the server know
whether to give me a TX-bound connection and when not to ? In version 1
FTPool maps to a pool with both TX and non-TX datasources. In version 2.
tgsDB maps directly to a TX-dataSource.
I might be asking a lot of strange questions, probably because I'm just
getting the hang of all the resource-reference issues that EJBs are
associated with.Bear with me ;)
//Linus
"Joseph Weinstein" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
Hi. As Jon said, the lookups are redundant. Because you showed that otherway,
I will infer that this code is always being run in serverside code. Good.I will give you
a third way which is much better than either of the ones you showed. Thefirst method
you showed has a problem for all but the latest sps, your jdbc objectswill all be
going through an unnecessary level of indirection because you are gettingan rmi jdbc
object which talks to the jts driver object.
The second, faster method you showed also has a serious problem! Oneshould
never call DriverManager methods in multithreaded JDBC programs becauseall
DriverManager calls are class-synchronized, including some small internalones like
DriverManager.println(), which all JDBC drivers and even the constructorfor
SQLException call, so one slow getConnection() call can inadvertantly haltall other
JDBC being done in the whole JVM! Also, for JVMs that have lots of jdbcdrivers
registered, DriverManager is inefficient because it simply sends your URLand
properties to every driver it has registered until it finds one thatdoesn't throw an
exception and returns a connection.
Here's the fastest way:
// do once and reuse driver object everywhere. Can be used by multiplethreads
Driver d =(Driver)Class.forName("weblogic.jdbc.jts.Driver").newInstance();
Then, whenever you want a connection:
public myJDBCMethod()
Connection c = null; // always a method level object
try {
c = d.connect("jdbc:weblogic:jts:FTPool", null);
... do all the jdbc for the method...
c.close();
c = null;
catch (Exception e) {
... do whatever, if needed...
finally {
// close connection regardless of failure or exit path
if (c != null) try {c.close();}catch (Exception ignore){}
Joe
Linus Nikander wrote:
Having recently load-tested the application we are developing I noticed
that
one of the most expensive (time-wise) calls was my fetch of adb-connection
from the defined db-pool. At present I fetch my connections using :
private Connection getConnection() throws SQLException {
try {
Context jndiCntx = new InitialContext();
DataSource ds =
(DataSource)
jndiCntx.lookup("java:comp/env/jdbc/txDatasource");
return ds.getConnection();
} catch (NamingException ne) {
myLog.error(this.makeSQLInsertable("getConnection - couldnot
find connection"));
throw new EJBException(ne);
In other parts of the code, not developed by the same team, I've seenthe
same task accomplished by :
private Connection getConnection() throws SQLException {
return DriverManager.getConnection("jdbc:weblogic:jts:FTPool");
From the performance-measurements I made the latter seems to be muchmore
efficient (time-wise). To give you some metrics:
The first version took a total of 75724ms for a total of 7224 callswhich
gives ~ 11ms/call
The second version took a total of 8127ms for 11662 calls which gives
~0,7ms/call
I'm no JDBC guru som i'm probably missing something vital here. One
suspicion I have is that the second call first find the jdbc-pool andafter
that makes the very same (DataSource)
jndiCntx.lookup("java:comp/env/jdbc/txDatasource") in order to fetch the
actual connection anyway. If that is true then my comparison is plainwrong
since one call is part of the second. If not, then the second versionsure
seems a lot faster.
Apart from the obvious performance-differences in the two aboveapproaches,
is there any other difference one should be aware of(transaction-context
for instance) between the two ? Basically I'm working in anEJB-environment
on weblogic 7.0 and looking for the most efficient way to get hold of a
db-connection in code. Comments anyone ?
//Linus Nikander - [email protected]

What's the most efficient way to serve a file from a servlet?

I have a servlet that does various different things depending on the needs. Sometimes it dynamically generates content, and sometimes all it does is send a file out, with no alteration.
What is the most efficient way to just send a file?
One option:
OutputStream os = response.getOutputStream();
InputStream is = new FileInputStream(...)
(send all the bytes from is to os, the regular way using a buffer)Another option is to say:
RequestDispatcher rd = response.getRequestDispatcher(fileName);
rd.forward();Any other options? What's the prefered way of doing this?
I know the rule of "don't optimize too early" but this is a situation where we need to get the maximum amount of files served with the hardware we have, and it's going to be a lot of static files, so efficiency is important.
Thanks

Ok, that's what I thought. It would be nice if there were a "response.sendStream(InputStream input)" method in the ServletResponse class. Even nicer would be a sendFile or sendChannel or something. This is probably a common usage and it's a place where the container has many opportunities for optimization. For example, it could call the operating systems send_file kernel call so the entire transfer would be done directly from the disk controller to the ether card (on systems that support that).
For now I'll just do my own buffered copy.

Moving content from iMovie to iMovie - what's the most efficient way?

If I edit and create movies in iMovie08 on one iMac and I want to transfer the content to iMovie08 another iMac 200 miles away , what's the most efficient way? I prefer not to burn DVDs, because I want to do further work on the movies on the second iMac's iMovie (so I can share them with iTunes and sync them with Apple TV).

>PDPageAddCosContents(destPage, PDPageGetCosContents(srcPage));
Does this method (PDPageGetCosContent) exist? It would be easy enough
to create, but I don't see it in the document.
More seriously, I have a vague memory that it is a Really Bad Thing to
share the same Contents objects between multiple pages. Maybe
something to do with page deletion, can't remember.
>PDPageAddCosResource(destPage, PDPageGetCosResources(srcPage));
These two methods are not symmetric, and PDPageAddCosResource doesn't
work that way, sadly...
Aandi Inston

Finishing From FCP to DVD STUDIO..... should it be really simple????

I'm trying to find a way to to editing my DVD with surround because i'm more of a logic user
and i so all my surround editing and everything in logic
but for some strange reason i'm finding it had to take my project from FCP to DVD studio
to do all the chapters and menus and all the other things you get on most DVD
i know iDVD is the easiest way to go
but its limited abit
so can anyone give me a tip on how to import or open a FCP project in DVD stuido without exporting FCP project as DV or Movie and importing it into DVD studio
thanks in advance
stash

If you want it to be simple and don't need surround, just export a reference movie of your timeline from FCP and import that into DVDSP.
A reference movie is quick to export, as long as your timeline is rendered. It also doesn't take up much space, as it's simply a reference to all your render files.
Once you bring that into DVDSP, it will compress it and you can add your menus from templates, add chapter markers, and burn.
Those of us who do critical work prefer to use Compressor because it allows us control over every setting of the compression process and we can tailor our compression to the project at hand. But for ease of use, just import that reference movie into DVDSP and burn.
Also, set DVDSP to encode in the background, not encode on build. That way it will start compressing as soon as you import the file, so it's working while you're working on menus, etc. Otherwise it won't start compressing until you hit burn.

Best way from FCP using Compressor (too long render - 3 days?)

Hi
What's best quality, most efficient way to get our 85 min documentary out of FCP 6 to an SD DVD master?
Using 2008 model Mac Pro 3.0, 8GB RAM, I'm going from FCP to Compressor, via QT movie (current settings Pro Res) of Timeline, bring it into Compressor = NTSC, 16x9, 2 pass VBR best, 6.5 to 7.6 bit rate, GOP = IBBP closed, size 15, Frame Controls ON, resize filter = BEST, De-interlace = fast, Rate Conversion = Good...
I did a 2 minute test and it took an hour! And that was for a web-friendly 480 x 270 size. What's it going to be at 720 x 405 (the 16 x 9 version) - 3 days? What to do? Should I print the timeline to tape and bring it to a post house and they can do better or what? I know if I turn frame controls to OFF it'll speed up significantly, but then the FONTS/Text especially when over Black BG look horrible after compressed to 720 x 405.
Suggestions?
K

This ain't going to help much, sorry. Give us a few more hours, maybe a day or two, one or more of the DVDSP wonks will stop by and offer better advice.
What's best quality, most efficient way to get our 85 min documentary out of FCP 6 to an SD DVD master? < </div>
The DVD will be MPEG2. Working in anything higher quality than that has questionable benefits, the ratio of increased processing time to improved results is completely one-sided, a waste of time.
Compression is a disappointing series of compromises unless you totally understand the process. You can spend a few hours researching articles by Jan Ozer to help you decide what your workflow should be. Me, I would export a self-contained movie out of FCP to a codec that would hold a reasonable amount of spatial rez before going to Compressor.
Exporting self-contained creates a new media file that requires no further handling or rendering which is probably holding you up now. Every frame is being recreated before it can be compressed.But I never use Compressor to create the MPEG2, I let DVDSP do that for me. This shortcut produces every bit of quality I need for my projects.
Your situation, apparently, is different. And there is no real shortcut for you except to research it and try to find a recipe that suits your expectations. But whatever you do, MPEG2 is going to be a real bummer, especailly if you are shrinking or scaling your large format image to letterbox or anamorphic.
bogiesan

Most efficient way to do some string manipulation

Greetings,
I need to cleanse some data in a string by replacing unsafe characters with encoded equivalents. (FYI, this is for the purpose of transforming "unsafe" characters into encoded values as data inside an XML document).
The following code accomplishes the task:
Note that a string "currentValue" contains the data to be cleansed.
A string, "encodedValue" contains the result.
for (counter = 0; counter < currentValue.length(); counter++)
    addChar = (currentValue.substring(counter,counter+1));
    if (addChar.equals("<"))
      addChar = "#60;";
    if (addChar.equals(">"))
      addChar = "#62;";
    if (addChar.equals("="))
      addChar = "#61;";
    if (addChar.equals("\""))
      addChar = "#34;";
    if (addChar.equals("'"))
      addChar = "#39;";
    if (addChar.equals("'"))
      addChar = "#39;";
    if (addChar.equals("/"))
      addChar = "#47;";
    if (addChar.equals("\\"))
      addChar = "#92;";
    encodedValue += addChar;
} // forI'm sure there is a way to make this more efficient. I'm not exactly "new" to java, but I am learning on my own with no formal training and often take a "brute force" approach with my initial effort.
What would be the most efficient way to re-do the above?
TIA,
--Paul Galvin
Integrated Systems & Services Group

im a c++ programmer so im not totally up on these java classes either but...from a c++ stand point you might want to consider using the if else statment.
by using if else, you only test the character until you find the actual "violating" character and skip the rest of the tests.
also, you might trying using something to check for alphaNumeric cases first and use the continue keyword when you find one. since more of your characters are probably safe than unsafe you can skip all the ifs/if else statement and only do one test on the good characters. (i just looked for a way to test that and i didnt find one. c++ has a function that does that by checking the ascii number range. dont think that works in java. but maybe you can find one, it would reduce the number of tests probably.)
happy hunting,
txjump :)

Most efficient way to load XML file data into tables

I have a complex XML file running into MBs. I want to load it's data into 7-8 tables.
Which way will be better:
1) Use SQL Loader to actually load directly into the 7-8 tables directly by modifying the control card.
Is this really possible and feasible? I am not even sure about it
2) Load data as XML Type in a table and register it. Then extract from there to load into various tables.
Please help. I have to find the most efficient way of doing it.
Regards,
Sudhir

Yes it is possible to use SQL*Loader to parse and load XML, but that is not what it was designed for and so is not recommended. You also don't need to register a schema, just to load/store/parse XML in the DB either.
So where does that leave you?
Some options
{thread:id=410714} (see page 2)
{thread:id=1090681}
{thread:id=1070213}
Those talk some about storage options and reading in XML from disk and parsing XML. They should also give you options to consider. Without knowing more about your requirements for the effort, it is difficult to give specific advice. Maybe your 7-8 tables don't exist and so using Object Relational Storage for the XML would be the best solution as you can query/update tables that Oracle creates based off the schema associated to the XML. Maybe an External Table definition works better for reading the XML into the system because this process will happen just once. Maybe using WebDAV makes more sense for loading XML to be parsed (I don't have much experience with this, just know it is possible from what I've read on the forums). Also, your version makes a difference as you have different options available depending upon the version of Oracle.
Hope all that helps as a starter.
Edited by: A_Non on Jul 8, 2010 4:31 PM
A great example, see the answers by mdrake in {thread:id=1096784}

Most efficient way to make an ordered list?

Hi all,
I have a simulation where I have agents running around in an environment. These agents need to get the closest agent near them, and they have to do this a whole bunch of times each cycle -- closest predator to them, closest prey, closest mate, next-closest mate if that one isn't interested, etc. etc.
I realized that it would be faster if I just got all the agents in the vicinity ONCE, kept them in a sorted list, and then everytime you want the closest agent of a certain type, just search from the bottom of the list up until you find the first one of that type.
So here's the question: to make that list, I ask the environment for all the agents in the vicinity, and then go through them one-by-one. I find out the distance between myself and that agent. I then.... what?
I could put them all into an ArrayList, and then apply some sorting algorithm to that ArrayList. Or I can try to insert them in the right order WHILE I'm making the ArrayList. Or maybe there's some better Collection object that would be even more efficient -- somehow pushing them in and out of stacks, or whatever else smart programmers think up.
Can anyone suggest the most efficient way to do this? This is something that every agent has to do every step, so efficiency is key.
Thanks!
Edit: As a note, calculating the distance between two agents isn't free, and if I either sort or insert as I'm making it, the naive implementation (i.e. the way I would do it...) would require re-checking this distance for every agent in the list every single time a new agent was added. So maybe I could make some use of a HashMap, so that I can store these distances?
Edited by: TimQuinn on Oct 15, 2009 9:35 AM

TimQuinn wrote:
Ok, thanks for all the great suggestions. I think that caching the distance in a wrapper object is a big plus, and then I can run some tests and see if using a built-in collections sorting algorithm or using a treeset is faster in my specific case. Thanks!
Any thoughts as to the idea of creating one giant map of the distance from each agent to every other agent just once, rather than having each agent work out their own distances to each other agent? I feel like this would be faster (at the expense of memory), but don't know how I'd start approaching it.Well, your idea of the Map would probably work. You would have to make some object that pairs up two agents, something like this:
public class AgentPair {
   private final Agent a1, a2;
   public AgentPair(Agent a1, Agent a2) { //...
   public boolean equals(Object other) {
      //if distance is a symmetric operation (a.distanceTo(b) == b.distanceTo(a)) then the reverse pair should also be equal
   public int hashCode() {
      return 37*a1.hashCode() + a2.hashCode();
}This assumes either that you don't override equals or hashCode in Agent, or that you properly override both.
Then you would have a map that you can populate, given an array of all agents:
Map<AgentPair, Double> distMap;
Agent[] agents;
for ( int i = 0; i < agents.length-1; i++ ) {
   for ( int j = i; j < agents.length; j++ ) {
      distMap.put(new AgentPair(agents, agents[j]), agents[i].distanceTo(agents[j]));
}Alternatively, if you're not sure you'll definitely use all of the computations, you could alternatively test to see if the computation result is in the map, and if not, perform it; otherwise, use the cached result.
Any thoughts? Should I make a new post? Abandon the idea?As always, try it and see. Essentially, it will be faster assuming these two conditions:
1) You would have to do more than n ^2^ (well actually n choose 2) distance calculations otherwise, and
2) Computing the distance costs more than retrieving from distMap (this +isn't+ a given!). If each Agent had a sequential ID, you could do a two-dimensional array of doubles which would speed up lookups.
Edited by: endasil on 15-Oct-2009 3:39 PM

Most efficient way to consume log files

Hello everyone,
I've been absent from the forums for awhile but I'm back at it now...
I have a question about the most efficient way to consume log files. I read in Powershell in action, by Bruce Payette that using a switch statement with a regex worked pretty well, that being said I haven't tried it yet. Select-string is working pretty
well for me but I have about 10 different entry types that I need to search logs for every 5 minutes and I'm scanning about 15 GB of logs at every interval. Anyway, if anyone has information about how to do something like that as quickly as possible
I'd appreciate it.
1. piping log files that meet my criteria to select-string
- This seems to work well but I don't like searching the same files over and over again
2. running logs through get-content and then building a filter statement
- This is ok but it seems to use up a fair bit of memory
3. Some other approach that I haven't thought of yet.
Anyway, I know this is a relatively nebulous question, sorry about that. I'm hoping that someone on here knows a really good way to find strings in logs files quickly.
Hope that helps! Jason

You can sometimes squeeze out more speed at the expense of memory usage, but filters are pretty fast. I don't see a benefit to holding the whole file in memory, in this case.
As I mentioned earlier, though, C# code will usually blow PowerShell away in terms of execution time. Here's a rewrite of what I just did (just for the INI Section pattern, to keep the post size down):
$string = @'
#Comment Line
[Ini-Style Section Line]
Key = Value Line
192.168.0.1 localhost
Some line that doesn't match anything.
Set-Content -Path .\test.txt -Value $string
Add-Type -TypeDefinition @'
using System;
using System.Text.RegularExpressions;
using System.Collections;
using System.IO;
public interface ILineParser
object ParseLine(string line);
public class IniSection
public string Section;
public class IniSectionParser : ILineParser
public object ParseLine(string line)
object o = null;
Match match = Regex.Match(line, @"^\s*\[([^\]]+)\]\s*$");
if (match.Success)
o = new IniSection() { Section = match.Groups[1].Value };
return o;
public class LogParser
public static IEnumerable ParseFile(string fileName, ILineParser[] lineParsers)
using (StreamReader sr = File.OpenText(fileName))
string line;
while ((line = sr.ReadLine()) != null)
foreach (ILineParser parser in lineParsers)
object result = parser.ParseLine(line);
if (result != null)
yield return result;
$parsers = @(
New-Object IniSectionParser
$results = [LogParser]::ParseFile("$pwd\test.txt", $parsers)
$results
Instead of defining separate classes for each type of line and output object, you could probably do something more generic with delegates (similar to how I used ScriptBlock.Invoke() in the PowerShell example), but it might sacrifice some speed to do so.

Most efficient way to do multiple crops on many images?

I have a large number of images shot in the default 4:3 aspect ratio. I need to print almost 200 as 4x6, and and undetermined but certainly large number as 8x10, so I have a lot of cropping to do. What would seasoned Aperture users suggest as the most efficient way to do this? I've thought of two possibilities:
1. Duplicate every image I need to print in both sizes and crop one for each size print. This is the best option I've thought of, but it would certainly eat a lot of drive space.
2. Do all the 8x10 crops, revert to original, and do the 4x6 crops. Saves disk space, but leave me with only the 4x6 crop in Aperture. (Sounds like I want to have my cake and eat it too, I suppose.)
Anyway, there are a lot of you out there who have logged a lot more Aperture hours than I have. Is there a better workflow I have not considered?
Thanks,
Ben

Hello Ben,
the beauty of Aperture is, that you can have many versions of an image without needing much extra disk space.
To have three versions of an image cropped to different aspect ratios, don't create duplicate master images but use (from the Aperture main menu) "Photos -> Duplicate version" or "New Version from Master". Then crop this new version to a different aspect ratio. Aperture will not really render a new image file but just store the cropping rectangle to be able to create the cropped image when you export or print it.
So you can have an original version, a 8x10 version, a 4x6 version in your library without needing much extra space - that is one of the rare occasions when you can have your cake and eat it too
Regards
Léonie

[11g] most efficient way to calculate size of xmltype type column

I need to check the current size of some xmltype column in a BIU trigger.
I don't think it's good to use
length(:new.xml_data.GetStringVal());
or
dbms_lob.GetLength(:new.xml_data.GetClobVal());
What's the most efficient way to get the storage size?
I don't need the string serialized size.
It could also be the internal storage size (incl. administration data overhead).
- thanks!
regards,
Frank

> May I ask for what reason you need to know it?
I need to handle very large XML document output, which currently hits the internal xmltype limitation of 4GByte, when aggregating XML document fragments for this.
> You'll get a relevant answer if you give us relevant information :
> - exact db version
SELECT * FROM PRODUCT_COMPONENT_VERSION;
product
version
status
1
NLSRTL
11.2.0.3.0
Production
2
Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition
11.2.0.3.0
64bit Production
3
PL/SQL
11.2.0.3.0
Production
4
TNS for Linux:
11.2.0.3.0
Production
> - DDL of your table
> XML stored as XMLType datatype can use different storage models, depending on the version.
I don't use dedicated storage clause.
But i am hitting the problem already for aggregation into some xmltype variable in PL/SQL
- BEFORE writing back to a result table.
Can i avoid such problems, when writing to a table DIRECTLY w/o intermediate xmltype PL/SQL variable
- depending on the storage clause?
The reason why asking how to get the size of some xmltype (in table column and/or in PL/SQL variable) is, that i am thinking of a threshold detection.
In case threshold is reached: outsource XML fragment so far to some separate CLOB storage, and insert a smaller meta-information reference representing that in the output document.
Finally leave up to the client system to use <xs:include> (or alike) to construct the complete document.
rgds,
Frank

Iterators - most efficient way to get last object?

Collection of objects, such as from an EJB, and I want to only get the last object. What is the most efficient way of doing this?
TIA!

addendum to previous post.
Allthough, that test would call to mind the question what are you going to do if it is 0? Throw an exception, as the code stands it will throw an index out of bounds exception to the calling process which could be handled there, and in truth probably should be.
Modified and expanded example
public class ListThingie{
     java.util.ArrayList listOfThingies = null
     public ListThingie(){
          super() ;
          listOfThingies = new java.util.ArrayList() ;
          buildListOfThingies() ;
     public void buildListOfThingies(){
          //... build the ArrayList here
     public Object getLastThingie() throws IndexOutOfBoundsException{
          return listOfThingies.get((listOfThingies.size()-1)) ;
public class ThingieProcessor{
     public static void main( String[] args){
          try{
               ListThingie listThingie = new ListThingie() ;
               System.out.println(listThingie.getLastThingie()) ;
          catch(IndexOutOfBoundsException e){
               System.out.println(e.getMessage()) ;
}There, that's better.

Most efficient way from FCP to DVD? Encode when?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for