Most reliable way to link to a Quicktime file in HTML

What’s the best / most reliable way to link to a Quicktime.mov file in HTML (via Dreamweaver). Taking into account different browsers and operating systems PC & Mac.
I want to use a text and/or image to link to the QT file, what’s the best way to do it, a QK player pop-up; or a new window?
Thanks!
imac G4 Mac OS X (10.3.9)

In all the years in using Dreamweaver. I have never used the embed code generated by by Dreamweaver. The coding not complete and I feel better writing my own. Untill a few years ago I found this neat little program that write a fairly complete code.
PAGEot...and it free. It not only writes the emebed code but it can write the javascript code for IE7 (for Windows). Plus it does a lot of other neat things that you do with Quicktime...play lists, poster frames to name a few.
http://www.qtbridge.com/pageot/pageot.html
You can either use the html page it makes or just copy and paste the embed code into you own html...
The coding it makes is compliant with most major browsers. either PC or Mac.

Similar Messages

What is the most reliable way to run one Windows accounting program in Osx 10.5.8?

I have a simple Windows application where I basically do my accounts. I do not want to tie up my Imacs resources with running a full Windows Os "emulation" like Paralells or VMware Fusion just to run a simple accounting program.
I have heard about apps that can run one windows application at the time through a kind of Osx Application which emulates windows some how. Is is true that this is a better way of running my accounting program? Is it reliable? What I do is to punch in invoices and print out reports basically. How much resources does this "consume" to run it in "one simple application mode" in comparison with for example Paralells?
And what is the term for running windows in "one simple application mode"?

I guess you could try the free trial of CrossOver. http://www.codeweavers.com/products/crossover/ You did not say what app you want to run so it is difficult for us to recommend crossover as being able to run the app.
But your question is that you are looking for the "most reliable" way to run a Windows program. In my opinion you need Parallels or Fusion. These run the real Windows OS so my thinking is it is the "most reliable" method of running a Windows app on an Apple computer, other than Boot Camp.
But you said you don't want Parallels. This is probably why you have not received any responses. You eliminated the most reliable and easiest method, in my opinion, when you initially posted. Parallels does not consume any resources until you start it up to use your app. You can close it after you are done with your app. Of course hard drive space is required for storing the OS, your app, and data. But you still need to store your app and data regardless of method you choose.
One more thing, Parallels and Fusion create a virtual machine for running Windows.
So my recommendation, use Parallels or Fusion.

Most reliable way to find site code in powershell

Hi,
Is there a reliable way of finding the site code for a ConfigMgr 2012 site in powershell?
Something like a consistent registry key or a some other way. I did think of looking up the share SMS_sitecode but wondered if there was a better way?
Thanks in advance.

Cheers, you're very welcome.
Here's a link to the entire cmdlet reference:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/jj821831%28v=sc.20%29.aspx
Don't retire TechNet! -
(Don't give up yet - 13,085+ strong and growing)

Whats the safest and most reliable way to backup

I have two computers that I want to Backup, one having over 1.5 TB. One option I have is I could buy a 2TB Time Capsule or External hard drive, but I have also read into setting up a home server out of a old G5 Powermac to backup to. Even though the G5 route would cost more up front but it would be easier to expand the storage in it for my forever growing storage needs, but am worried about the reliability of the G5. I'm trying to find the most reliable and secure way to back my computers up. Can anyone shed some light on this for me? I have read many Pros and Cons about backing up to a server or a external hard drive. Am I better off with continuing to have to buy larger and larger external hard drives or setting up a server. One last question, which one Is the safest against a computer virus.
I'm sorry for the long explanation and I very much appreciate all your help.

All backup systems have similar types of risks: data corruption and disk failure. These risks are no different for discrete disk backups or network accessible storage backups. The latter has the additional risks associated with using a network.
The best defence against these risks is to make multiple backups using different backup methods. The more the better.
There is no backup system immune to computer viruses. They come from computers, not the backups.
Basic Backup
For some people Time Machine will be more than adequate. Time Machine is part of OS X. There are two components:
1. A Time Machine preferences panel as part of System Preferences;
2. A Time Machine application located in the Applications folder. It is
     used to manage backups and to restore backups. Time Machine
     requires a backup drive that is at least twice the capacity of the
     drive being backed up.
Alternatively, get an external drive at least equal in size to the internal hard drive and make (and maintain) a bootable clone/backup. You can make a bootable clone using the Restore option of Disk Utility. You can also make and maintain clones with good backup software. My personal recommendations are (order is not significant):
1. Carbon Copy Cloner
2. Data Backup
3. Deja Vu
4. SuperDuper!
5. Synk Pro
6. Tri-Backup
Visit The XLab FAQs and read the FAQ on backup and restore. Also read How to Back Up and Restore Your Files. For help with using Time Machine visit Pondini's Time Machine FAQ for help with all things Time Machine.
Although you can buy a complete external drive system, you can also put one together if you are so inclined. It's relatively easy and only requires a Phillips head screwdriver (typically.) You can purchase hard drives separately. This gives you an opportunity to shop for the best prices on a hard drive of your choice. Reliable brands include Seagate, Hitachi, Western Digital, Toshiba, and Fujitsu. You can find reviews and benchmarks on many drives at Storage Review.
Enclosures for FireWire and USB are readily available. You can find only FireWire enclosures, only USB enclosures, and enclosures that feature multiple ports. I would stress getting enclosures that use the Oxford chipsets especially for Firewire drives (911, 921, 922, for example.) You can find enclosures at places such as;
1. Cool Drives
2. OWC
3. WiebeTech
4. Firewire Direct
5. California Drives
6. NewEgg
All you need do is remove a case cover, mount the hard drive in the enclosure and connect the cables, then re-attach the case cover. Usually the only tool required is a small or medium Phillips screwdriver.

*** Is there a way to see all my quicktime file info?

Is there a way to click on an .mp4 file I have created to see all the attributes including how exactly it was encoded? I encoded a clip for the web late last night that looks great directly from FCP to compressor but when I went to do another one today I couldn't get it to look the same............

Open the file in QuickTime and select Window>Show Movie Info
Hopefully this will show you all you need.

AS to link to external Quicktime file

How can I modify the following code to create a button that
onclick
opens a Quicktime file on the same server?
Btn1.addEventListener(MouseEvent.CLICK, loadPage);
function loadPage(event:MouseEvent):void{
var myURL:URLRequest = new URLRequest("
http://www.adobe.com/file.pdf");
navigateToURL(myURL,"_blank");
Thanks!

so is the correct syntax the following?
Btn1.addEventListener(MouseEvent.CLICK, loadPage);
function loadPage(event:MouseEvent):void{
var myURL:URLRequest = new URLRequest("/about/us/blah.mov");
navigateToURL(myURL,"_blank");
Thanks!
ccoonen wrote:
> just change your path: from "
http://www.adobe.com/file.pdf"
to "/about/us/blah.mov".

Link to local PDF-file / or html (not web-view)

Hi,
i posted this in the prerelease-forum and got no answear so i thought i give it a try and post here.
i see it is possible to link to a local pdf file with the webview function.
but i want to show a local pdf-file in the app-browser. the one in which linked websites are shown and where i can click "done" to close the window.
i've seen it f.e. in the "new yorker" app where f.e. the cartoon gallery is shown in this browser, so it has to be possible.
does anybody know how this could work?
tyvm
david

Your code is a mess:
** there is no apparent reason for the span:
<td><span class="style1"
onfocus="MM_openBrWindow('pdf/PR_launch.pdf','','')">Milford, OH
So change that line to:
<td>Milford, OH
** here you have two double quotes before This.
<a title="This" class="pdfFile"
onclick="MM_openBrWindow('pdf/PR_Launch.pdf','','')"
Change it to this, (with some other improvements):
<a title="This" class="pdfFile"
onclick="MM_openBrWindow(this.href,'','');return false"
** This is code salad:
href="PR_Launch.pdf" link="" will="" open="" a=""
.pdf=""
file.="">More (PR_Launch.pdf,
230kb)</a></span></td>
Change it to:
href="pdf/PR_Launch.pdf">More (PR_Launch.pdf,
230kb)</a></td>
If you continue to have trouble, you might find my divaPOP
Extension
easier, and far more powerful. It automat6ically opens pdf
files and
links to all external files in a popup window without your
needing to
code each link:
http://www.divahtml.com/products/divaPOP/open_popup_windows.php
E. Michael Brandt
www.divaHTML.com
divaPOP : standards-compliant popup windows
divaGPS : you-are-here menu highlighting
divaFAQ : FAQ pages with pizazz
www.valleywebdesigns.com/vwd_Vdw.asp
JustSo PictureWindow
JustSo PhotoAlbum, et alia

Is display port and mini display port the most reliable way to connect to U2515H and alike?

It seems that there are a lot of horror stories with HDMI or DVI-to-HDMI, like not able to get 2560x1440 on U2515H.
So, is using the display port or mini display port the safest way to get U2515H working?
Which cards with display port so far work best with U2515H? Any recommendation?

What is Target Display mode?
Stefan

Is there a reliable way to move 10.5.8 files to mavericks (10.9.5)

Moving files from iMac 10.5.8 to iMac 10.9.5 via Migration assistant is worthless. Likewise using Time Machine backup on external disk. On the
Mavericks device MA complaints the older machine needs updating, however the older machine does recognize the new (ethernet connect).
Mavericks Time Machine keeps looking for a viable backup, won't read the one designated. Ptui on all of it. Looks like the only means availble
is to copy files to intermediate device, then to the new. Then figure out where the files go....

Hi, true, you cannot migrate from 10.5.8 to 10.9.5, you can only migrate from 10.5 to 10.6, then from 10.6 to a higher OSX.

Simplest/most reliable setup for 2 mini's+ext HD+backup+printer?

Hello and a happy 2009 to everyone,
I'm a recent switcher (replaced one PC with a mini). Using it for internet/email and getting to grips with OpenOffice 3.0; transferred photos and music onto an ext HD and using them with iTunes and iPhoto (and trying out Acorn for editing the photos). Very happy so far !
Next step is replacing our other PC with another mini (though I may wait to see if they'll be updated soon) and getting the two mini's linked up and sharing a (non-network) printer, the internet connection (through the ADSL modem provided by the internet provider; it has WiFi and 2 ethernet sockets), the ext HD (with the photos and music files), and a second ext HD (to be purchased, RAID?) for backing up the two mini's and the first ext HD. As my wife and I would have/use each our 'own' mini and hence keep our own mail and bookmarks, there won't be a need to synchronize anything. However, there would be the need to share documents; in fact, we'd prefer to only have one home folder, but I guess that'll difficult/impossible with two machines and thus two OS running.
As I have no experience whatsoever with even the simplest of networks, I have a few (rather basic) questions:
* What's the best/simplest/most reliable way to achieve the above?
E.g.: linking the two mini's thru an ethernet (gigabit) connection and fully sharing everything, attaching the printer and one ext HD to one mini and the other ext HD to the other mini, and both mini's wirelessly to the ADSL modem (which we'd really rather prefer to do thru ethernet, but the mini's only have one ethernet socket each…)? Advantage(?) would/could be that both ext HD's could be FW rather than USB. Would backing up on one ext HD (thru Time Machine), of both internal HD's and the other ext HD work that way?
Or should we get an AEBS (or another router) and connect both mini's (which will be in the same room, not far from each other and not far from the ADSL modem and the printer either) as well as the ADSL modem to it thru ethernet and, thru an USB-hub, the ext HD's (thru AirDisk) and the printer as well?
Or a combination of the above?
Or in a different way altogether?
Are there any other things that I have to take into account?
Any response highly appreciated!

Steve, thanks for your input!
In the meantime I've found out that my ADSL modem is also a NAT router, but 'only' 10/100 Mb/s, so I was wondering whether I get/do/make what I want to achieve a bit cheaper/simpler?
E.g. thru a Gigabit switch (rather than an AEBS) to which I connect the 2 Mini's as well as the modem/router, and the printer and external HD's directly to the mini's?
Some Qs:
* Would a Mini-to-Mini connection thru a (Gigabit) switch work better/faster than plugging both mini's into the (10/100) modem/router?
* Would in either scenario both mini's have to be on (and not 'just' in sleep mode) to be able to share the printer and the external HD's?

The most compatible way of offering short movies on a website?

Hi everyone,
I am working on a website which offers links to short movies
which the admin has uploaded. they are in mwv/mpg/avi format. I am
using this object method, I can see them on my systems, but the
client cannot make it to work on their systems. I am looking for
the most compatible way of linking and displaying short movies on
the site. work with PC and mac.
this is my current method that apparently is not fully
compatible:
<cfoutput><embed src="Media/#MediaParam#"
width="408" height="354" autostart="1"
showstatusbar=1></embed></cfoutput>
any help is appreciated in advance..

can the data go from the drive direct to the ATV2?
no.
iTunes must be running to fetch and serve the content to ATV.
I ask as its far easier to connect a ATV2 and a Network drive via cat5, however itd be nice to not have to plug a mac in as well.
if your wireless network is n-capable and doesn't suffer interference problems, that scenario might work.
Possible try to get a older ATV?
good luck with that they are hard to come by. try eBay or something.

What's the easiest way to has an ORACLE DB and a Html homepage linked?

Let's say I want to make a simple HTML homepage (just to make simple queries). What would be the easiest way to have that?
please the EASIEST way. (dont mean to program PHP, nor getting IAS).
the simple, cheapest and easiest way please.
thanks
P.D (I want just a way to link my Oracle DataBase with my Html page)

mod_plsql.
utl_http. <- most basic. check asktom.oracle.com
htmldb.oracle.com

Major Finder Problem for Quicktime Files

Hey all,
I have noticed a horrible bug in Finder for Sprited Quicktime files.
Some background. Some files I download have web 'popups' in the Quicktime file as a marketing campaign. We put a link inside the Quicktime file (you can do so in GoLive) so when it is opened to the end a web link pops up.
However, Leopard has introduced a bug where if you open a folder that even HAS one of these sprited Quicktime files, it will open my browser and go to the link inside the Quicktime file, even though I did even open the file.
I know this bug does not effect everyone, but it is a serious bug in the software.

dude. gotta watch where you download your pornoze!
heh
thx for the heads up. havent noticed that yet here. i wonder if this bug is because of quick look...

Reliable way to sync/link activities between files stored in sharepoint

Hello, we have two different Microsoft project files A and B. Both files are stored in a SharePont workspace. In file A there are tasks that needs to be copied (and synchronized) to B. Currently this is done manually but we would like to have the
tasks update automatically in B when they are updated in A.
What we have tried is to copy and paste as special (link) which would seem to work as intended.
Is this a reliable method of synchronizing a large number of tasks and subtasks or is there another way to solve this more reliably? When trying locally I've occasionally received errors roughly translated: "Could not connect
to link / broken link".
Thanks in advance,
Sebastian

Hi,
I strongly suggest you to avoid creating link with copy-paste special. It could introduce corruption in your projects.
I understand that you are not using project server thus a way for linking tasks between projects is to use the inter projects links. This allows you seeing the delays of external predecessors and accepting/rejecting it.
Here is the procedure:
http://pmpspecialists.com/Blog/2012/07/cross-project-task-dependencies-in-project-server-2010/
http://microsoftepmsolution.blogspot.ca/2012/01/epm2010-creating-cross-project-links.html
Hope this helps,
Guillaume Rouyre, MBA, MVP, MCP |

Most efficient way to delete "removed" photos from hard disk?

Hello everyone! Glad to have this great community to come to for help. I searched for this question but came up with no hits. If it's already been discussed, I apologize and would love to be directed to the link.
My wife and I have been using LR for a long time. We're currently on version 4. Unfortunately, she's not as tech-savvy or meticulous as I am, and she has been unknowingly "Removing" photos from the LR catalogues when she really meant to delete them from the hard disk. That means we have hundreds of unwanted raw photo files floating around in our computer and no way to pick them out from the ones we want! As a very organized and space-conscious person, I can't stand the thought. So my question is, what is the most efficient way to permanently delete these unwanted photos from the hard disk
I did fine one suggestion that said to synchronize the parent folder with their respective catalogues, select all the photos in "Previous Import," and delete those, since they will be all of the photos that were previously removed from the catalogue.
This is a great suggestion, but it probably wouldn't work for all of my catalogues since my file structure is organized by date (the default setting for LR). So, two catalogues will share the same "parent folder" in the sense that they both have photos from May 2013, but if I synchronize May 2013 with one, then it will get all the duds PLUS the photos that belong in the other catalogue.
Does anyone have any suggestions? I know there's probably not an easy fix, and I'm willing to put in some time. I just want to know if there is a solution and make sure I'm working as efficiently as possible.
Thank you!
Kenneth

I have to agree with the comment about multiple catalogs referring to images that are mixed in together... and the added difficulty that may have brought here.
My suggestions (assuming you are prepared to combine the current catalogs into one)
in each catalog, put a distinctive keyword onto all the images so that you can later discriminate these images as to which particular catalog they were formerly in (just in case this is useful information later)
as John suggests, use File / "Import from Catalog" to bring all LR images together into one catalog.
then in order to separate out the image files that ARE imported to LR, from those which either never were / have been removed, I would duplicate just the imported ones, to an entirely separate and dedicated disk location. This may require the temporary use of an external drive, with enough space for everything.
to do this, highlight all the images in the whole catalog, then use File / "Export as Catalog" selecting the option "include negatives". Provide a filename and location for the catalog inside your chosen new saving location. All the image files that are imported to the catalog will be selectively copied into this same location alongside the new catalog. The same relative arrangement of subfolders will be created there, for them all to live inside, as is seen currently. But image files that do not feature in LR currently, will be left behind by this operation.
your new catalog is now functional, referring to the copied image files. Making sure you have a full backup first, you can start deleting image files from the original location, that you believe to be unwanted. You can do this safe in the knowledge that anything LR is actively relying on, has already been duplicated elsewhere. So you can be quite aggressive at this, only watching out for image files that are required for other purposes (than as master data for Lightroom) - e.g., the exported JPG files you may have made.
IMO it is a good idea to practice a full separation of image files used in your LR image library, from all other image files. This separation means you know where it is safe to manage images freely using the OS, vs where (what I think of as the LR-managed storage area) you need to bear LR's requirements constantly in mind. Better for discrete backup, too.
In due course, as required, the copied image files plus catalog can be moved bodily to another drive (for example, if they have been temporarily put on an external drive, and you want to store them on your main internal one again). This then just requires a single re-browsing of their parent folder's location, in order to correct LR's records inside this catalog, as to the image files' changed addresses.
If you don't want to combine the catalogs into one, a similar set of operations as above, can be carried out for each separate catalog you have now. This will create a separate folder structure in each case, containing just those duplicated image files. Once this has been done for all catalogs, you can start to clean up the present image files location. IMO this is very much the laborious and inflexible option, so far as future management of the total body of images is concerned... though there may still be some overriding reason for working that way.
RP

Most reliable way to link to a Quicktime file in HTML

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for