Most SharePoint DBs are not supported with AlwaysOn for Disaster Recover?

Hi ...
I'm in the middle of testing and assessing DR site for our SharePoint MSQQL instance. I found a lot of talking about ALwaysOn. I try to figure it out. It is nice and easy, combine DR and HA in single
solution- Wow.
After proceeding with some research I shocked when found only content and secure databases are supported in Async mode for DR site. We have Fail-over cluster (old fashion with shared storage) , what
the beneftis that will give me AlwaysOn in my case from building a DR point of view.
We are running hyper-v and SQL 2012

Thanks Sean for your explaining the answer. Actually I have many options, but the important thing as you said these things you wouldn’t play with. I need something is stable and strong without any complications.
My options are
User either AlwaysOn failover cluster OR Old windows cluster for HA with log shipping for DR.
For me this is supported and somehow acceptable.
User either AlwaysOn failover cluster – Old windows cluster for HA along with AlwaysOn for DR as Async replica. Still not supported from Microsoft.
We have already windows failover cluster with shared storage and I can go directly with log shipping for DR. However, still log shipping is not supported as DR for SharePoint but I’m going to make it as new instance and direct SharePoint farms to the DR
site. This procedure tested as moving database SharePoint instance to new server. It is worked well and straight forward.
Again, I cannot use AlwaysOn for SharePoint as DR while it is not supported (Contents and Secure is supported however as HA is fully supported).

Similar Messages

Opportunities are not supported with SAP Business One 2005A SP0 and SP1??

In SBO Note 973962 says that opportunities are not supported with 2005A sp0 and SP1.
When running 5.9.7 I can sync opportunities.
So does anyone know what is and what is not supported in this version for Opportunities?
Thanks,
Eric Rasenberg

Full functionality is not shared nor synchronized between systems for opportunities in 5.9.x

Has anyone else seen the "SharePoint is not supported with version 4.0.30319.18051" messages?

We are running SP 2010 service pack 2.
We are seeing the following messages on at least one of our farm machines. I was wondering whether others here have seen these messages and found a solution. The powershell ise was a running task, but not actually executing any code, etc.
When code was tried with it, the code appeared to be working as far as I could tell.
03/04/2014 15:25:11.28 powershell_ise.exe (0x162C)                     0x15EC SharePoint Foundation
Topology                        d04h    Monitorable     Microsoft SharePoint is not supported with version
4.0.30319.18051 of the Microsoft .Net Runtime.
03/04/2014 15:25:11.28 powershell_ise.exe (0x162C)                     0x15EC SharePoint Foundation
Topology                        888j    Medium          System.PlatformNotSupportedException:
Microsoft SharePoint is not supported with version 4.0.30319.18051 of the Microsoft .Net Runtime.     at Microsoft.SharePoint.Administration.SPConfigurationDatabase.get_Farm()     at Microsoft.SharePoint.Administration.SPConfigurationDatabase.SPFileSystemCacheWatcher.OnChanged(Object
source, FileSystemEventArgs e)

that appears to be doing the trick. I really appreciate your help.
It is weird - all that the kb recommends is changing the command line -version from "-version 2" to "-version 2.0".

I have just transfered 2 dvd movies i purchases with digital copies to my itunes account and now i am trying to put them om my ipad it keeps telling me that these movies are not supported on my ipad. what can i do?

I have just transfered 2 dvd movies i purchases with digital copies to my itunes account and now i am trying to put them om my ipad it keeps telling me that these movies are not supported on my ipad. what can i do?

Highlight the movie, go to iTunes menu ADVANCED and select create iPad and AppleTV version.

Backend System with Release 701 are not supported

SRM 5.0
Extended Classic Scenario
CCM 2.0
When updating the vendors in SRM system using TC - BBPUPDVD getting the below error message :-
Backend System with Release 701 are not supported
Have checked in table - BBP_BACKEND_DEST, the backend entry is properly maintained.
Can any one advice.
Regards,
Jayoti
Edited by: SAP jayoti on Dec 7, 2010 1:11 PM

The problem is resolved for vendor relication after applying the below notes 1313972 and 1372175.
ECC sandbox seems to be in 701 release. When the backend system ECC is in release 701, vendor replication fails with the error message that 'Backend system release 701 not supported'. We need to apply notes 1313972 and 1372175 to fix this issue. I have applied them in Sandbox and the issue is resolved now.

"there was a problem connecting to the server. URLS with the type 'file' are not supported"

i have a new macbook pro 13" and every 6 minutes or so it pops up a window that says "there was a problem connecting to the server. URLS with the type 'file' are not supported". it never seems to cause any problems but is supremely annoying. how can i make this come to an end?

I tried someone's solution of taking another external disc and plugging it in, then when it showed up and time machine asked if I wanted to use it or that someone might be trying to trick me, I chose not use it. Then I shut down my computer, plugged in the original Lacie, and rebooted the computer and all seems to work fine now-- the Lacie appears on my desktop and all seeems to be in working order. Who knows why or anything else,- as weird as it gets- but for now things seemed fixed--- maybe others can try this too-- it worked for me so far.

"There was a problem connecting to the server. URLs with the type "file:" are not supported. Why? What can be done to eliminate it?

After upgrading to Mountain Lion, I repeatedly get this message: "There was a problem connecting to the server. URLs with the type "file:" are not supported.
Why?
What can be done to eliminate it?

Open the Time Machine pane in System Preferences. If it shows that Time Machine is ON, click the padlock icon in the lower left corner, if necessary, to unlock it. Scroll to the bottom of the list of backup drives and click Add or Remove Backup Disk. Remove all the disks, then add them back. Quit System Preferences. Test.

Message - There was a problem connecting to the server. URLs with the type "file:" are not supported

new macbook pro receving this message: There was a problem connecting to the server. URLs with the type "file:" are not supported. What is causing this and how do

Open the Time Machine pane in System Preferences. If it shows that Time Machine is ON, click the padlock icon in the lower left corner, if necessary, to unlock it. Scroll to the bottom of the list of backup drives and click Add or Remove Backup Disk. Remove all the disks, then add them back. Quit System Preferences. Test.

There was a problem connecting to the server. URLs with the type "file:" are not supported. OK

I have just upgraded to Mountain Lion from Leopard, but now I keep getting this message when I open some web-pages and every time I wake the Mac up after going to sleep. For some odd reason I get it in Swedish sometimes (installed language) and some times in English...
There was a problem connecting to the server.
URLs with the type "file:" are not supported.
OK
What is this and how can I get rid of it. I use Firefox and have updated to latest version.

Open the Time Machine pane in System Preferences. If it shows that Time Machine is ON, click the padlock icon in the lower left corner, if necessary, to unlock it. Scroll to the bottom of the list of backup drives and click Add or Remove Backup Disk. Remove all the disks, then add them back. Quit System Preferences. Test.

Since installing Lion I keep getting the error message 'there was a problem connecting to the server. URLs with the type 'file:" are not supported"' How can I fix this?

since installing Lion I keep getting the error message 'there was a problem connecting to the server. URLs with the type 'file:" are not supported"' How can I fix this?

A Davey1 wrote:
Not a nice answer!
Posting "Check the 'More like this'" area and not simply providing the answer is a great way to make these groups worthless.
You're ignoring context. On the old Apple Discussion Groups I never posted replies like that, instead giving people relatively detailed answers. The new Apple Support Communities made things worse by introducing certain inefficiencies. Then came Lion. The flood of messages that came with Lion required a painful choice for any of the people who had been helping here: (1) Give quality responses to a few questions and ignore the rest. (2) When applicable, give a brief answer such as the one that you found objectionable. (3) Give up all the other normal activities of life and spend full time trying to answer questions here.
People who needed help with Lion problems seemed to have trouble discovering existing message threads that described how to solve their problems. I never posted the suggestion of "Check the 'More like this' area" without verifying that the help that the poster needed could be found there. Even doing that, what I posted saved me time that I could use to help someone else.
The people helping here are all volunteers. None of them is being paid for the time they spend here. They all have a life outside of Apple Support Communities. It's arrogant of you to demand that people helping here spend more time than they already do.

Cluster in a box with Guest LDOMs : SCSI-3 reservations are not supported

Hello,
I recently installed the Oracle Solaris Cluster 4.1 in two simple Guest LDOMs (OVM for SPARC 3.1) with one T5140 server and SE 7110 as a shared storage. The some SE 7110 whole LUNs mapped as VDS devices to both LDOMs. After initial installation of Oracle Solaris Cluster 4.1 I observed issues with quorum device - both nodes cannot get SCSI3 (default) persistent reservation keys information at same time - only one node can be able to scrub. After switching cluster's global fencing option to "nofencing" (with "software" quorum implementation) both nodes can access quorum device successfully. So I can conclude that SCSI3 PGRs are not supported in this cases.
Unfortunately I didn't find any official and nonofficial documents info regarding this limitation. Could you please confirm or decline my suggestion.
Thanks.

I am answering on my question by itself
Planning the Oracle Solaris OS - Oracle Solaris Cluster Software Installation Guide
Fencing – Do not export a storage LUN to more than one guest domain on the same physical machine unless you also disable fencing for that device. Otherwise, if two different guest domains on the same machine both are visible to a device, the device will be fenced whenever one of the guest domains halts. The fencing of the device will panic any other guest domain that subsequently tries to access the device.
RTFM...

I'm being shown an error pop-up message periodically saying "There was a problem connecting to the server. URLs with the type 'file:' are not supported." I have a brand new MacBook Pro, and at no time am I actually having trouble connecting to the server.

I'm being shown an error pop-up message periodically saying "There was a problem connecting to the server. URLs with the type 'file:' are not supported." I have a brand new MacBook Pro, and at no time am I actually having trouble connecting to the server, but this message continues to pop-up several times a day at random intervals. Is there something I'm doing wrong? Or is my computer just having a glitch? Other than that, and a mildly sticking caps lock button, it's working perfectly.
Thank you!

Alright it didn't solve it. Any other suggestions?
I haven't suggested a solution yet. I want to know whether you still get the messages while Time Machine is disabled. Do you? If so, try any or all of the solutions proposed in this thread:
There was a Problem connecting to the...: Apple Support Communities

I keep getting an error message saying "There was a problem connecting to the server. URLs with the type "file:" are not supported." Can someone help me get rid of it.

I keep getting an error message saying "There was a problem connecting to the server. URLs with the type "file:" are not supported" Can someone help me locate and get rid of this error.

Open the Time Machine pane in System Preferences. If it shows that Time Machine is ON, click the padlock icon in the lower left corner, if necessary, to unlock it. Scroll to the bottom of the list of backup drives and click Add or Remove Backup Disk. Remove all the disks, then add them back. Quit System Preferences. Test.

My Mac suddenly started getting a pop up message saying "There was a problem conecting to the server. URLs with the type "file" are not supported." My internet is working fine,no problem connecting. I just keep getting this message which I click off .

My Mac suddenly started getting a pop up message saying "There was a problem conecting to the server. URLs with the type "file" are not supported." My internet is working fine,no problem connecting. I just keep getting this message which I click off and continue working.

Open the Time Machine pane in System Preferences. If it shows that Time Machine is ON, click the padlock icon in the lower left corner, if necessary, to unlock it. Scroll to the bottom of the list of backup drives and click Add or Remove Backup Disk. Remove all the disks, then add them back. Quit System Preferences. Test.

BBPGETVD - error:backend systems with release 700 are not supported

Hi,
When I am trying to replicate vendor data from EEC to crm 4.0 via BBPGETVD.
I get the error message"backend systems with release 700 are not supported"
Is anyone have Idea what is wrong? and how can fix it?
Thanks,
Rachel

Yossi,
I believe that standard transaction does not work with ECC 6.0. The standard response would be to upgrade your CRM system to 5.0 so that you can download vendors from ECC 6.0.
Bascially the vendor replication programs in CRM below 5.0 aren't really that reliable for delta downloads(one error will cause an entire load to fail). So you probably at best should copy the SAP standards to generate custom load programs as a starting point.
It is not too difficult and overcomes some of the restrictions that SAP puts in place(i.e. you can only use one number range for vendors downloaded, etc.). This is definitely one of the weak points of CRM 4.0 that was fixed in CRM 5.0.
If you have more questions on this let me know.
Take care,
Stephen

Most SharePoint DBs are not supported with AlwaysOn for Disaster Recover?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for