Motion 4 supports image stabilization for pictures?

Hi everyone!
I am just wondering, if Motion4 supports an image stabilization for pictures like jpegs? Well, i have created some hyperlapse/walklapse's and want to
stabilize it as well...
Thank you very much!
best,
bobby

Under Add Behavior/motion tracking/stabalize. 
Hope that works for you.

Similar Messages

  • IMAGE STABILIZER for FCP

    Does anyone know of a good Image Stabilizer (and image tracker) for FCP? I have tried the demo of CHVelectronis, and I couldn't figure it out. Avid has one that is extremely intuitive *but, obviously, it doesnt work with FCP).
    Any of you worked with an easy to use one for FCP?
    Thanks,
    David

    a stabilizer is built in ... the effect is called SmoothCam (Effects > Video Filters > Video > SmoothCam)
    its best to export just the portion of the clip you want to stabilize as a standalone movie file before applying the effect to it as this will minimize the processing time
    http://audiovideoproducer.digitalmedianet.com/articles/viewarticle.jsp?id=165367
    for tracking you could use Lyric's Motion Tracking Kit
    http://www.lyric.com/fcp-plugins/tracking.htm
    but I would use Motion's Match Move
    http://www.motionsmarts.com/tutorials/matchmove1/mm1.html

  • Allow 5 axis image stabilization for non system lenses in A7(r)II series

    Many people use/will use their excellent non system manual focus non system macro lenses on the A7II and undoubtedly on the soon to be released A7RII. Stabilization in the X/Y planes is very very important for macro.  Sony on the A7II only stablizes the X/Y planes for lenses that report the focus distance.  Perhaps the lens compensation app can be modified so this data can be manually inputted or  even change the firmware to allow this and thus stabilize all 5 axes.  Focal length will need to be inputted of course as well.   If the new field is left blank, no action is taken as not to affect users not interested in this feature.  Olympus somehow allows all 5 axes to be stabilized just by putting in the focal length but it is not clear how they pull that off.  Thank you for considering this.

    Thank you for taking the time to answer.  I have done more digging in reviews and recalled sony's announcments which implied on 3 axis IS is available w/o a lens that reports focsing distance. Not my favorite source, but review from PCMag: "If you're using a non-native lens, or even a native manual focus lens like the Zeiss Loxia 2/50, it's stabilized along three axes—yaw, pitch, and roll. There's a technical reason for that. In order to compensate along the x and y axes, the camera needs to know the distance to the subject, which requires electronic communication of the focal distance from the lens to the body. To compensate for the other three axes, the only data that needs to be transmitted is the focal length of the lens. Even if you're using a purely mechanical Leica lensit can be stabilized—you're able to manually enter the focal length via a menu. The only real downside to this is that the A7 II does not add that focal length to the recorded EXIF data, so if you like to track which lens a shot is captured with, you'll need to take notes." http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2475439,00.asp A friend informed me that on his A7II he must mount a non OSS Sony lens first to have any image stabilization with any of his totally manual lenses--seems the camera saves the settings of the last lens attached.  Turning the cam off doesn't reset this--very odd---seems to be a bug in the firmware.  I hope the A7rII is different. This whole issue is quite confusing.  Appreciate any additonal clarification.

  • Image Stabilizer for iMovieHD6 and OSX10.8.5?

    I have a lot of 'wobbly' videos (Iknow I SHOULD use a tripod but these clips are when I've been filming while walking about) and the only one I've seen is by GeeThree Slick, but the problem is that it won't work with OSX10.8.5. as shown below:
    I emailed them to ask if they would upgrade it soon and their reply was as follows:
    So because Apple have this nasty attitude of blocking third party apps, as shown above, I really need to get an editing stabilizer like the GeeThree one as an alternative.
    Can anyone help me please?

    I have got a tripod but, as I explained in my post, the wobbly clips are caused by the fact that I was filming while walking about so my tripod would not be any help in that situation anyway.   As the problem already exists in the video, I'd like to correct it.
    Re your comment about me 'moaning', it's because (copy of information from GeeThree):
    Slick Transitions and Effects
    Volume Eight
    Slick Stabilize
    Amazing image stabilization takes out the shakes and jitters from your video. (does not work with Mac OS X 10.7 or later).
    So there you have it 'Slick Stabilize does not work with Mac OSX 10.7 or later'.  My second 'moan' refers to their reply about updating it (quote from GeeThree's email reply):
    Hello,
    Unfortunately there is no plan to update the Stabilizer plug-in for Mac OS X  10.7 or later.  Since Apple closed the door for us to continue to develop plug-ins, we no longer have the resources to update plug-ins from iMovie HD 6 to the most recent versions of OS X.
    Best Regards,
    GeeThree Slick Team
    For some reason my jpeg files cannot be seen as they would make everything clear about my complaints being justified.  You say 'Apple do nothing of the kind', so why does GeeThree say Apple have closed the door to them?

  • IMovie shuts down at the end of image stabilization of a clip.

    shuts down each time I use image stabilization for a clip......at the end of the process......

    i have no idea how to fix this problem

  • Image Stabilization in CS5 (no Mercalli Support)

    I have preordered CS5, and currently make use of the mercalli FX plugin to stabilize shaky video clips.  It doesn't appear that mercalli will be compatible with CS5 for a while, is there some other plug in I can use to provide high quality image stabilization?
    Has anyone used motion stabilization in After effects and compared it to what Mercalli does?
    For now I guess I will stabilize clips in Premiere Elements, export them, then use the pre-stabilized clips in CS5 but that will get cumbersome fast.
    Are there any really high quality motion stabilization plug ins that will be compatible with CS5?  Has anyone here compared Mercalli to other solutions, and found one that's better?
    -Roger Uzun

    Using the new version is far easier than the old, as you no longer have to select the best preset - the software now does this automatically in the initial analysis.  It is still possible to tweak the various individual settings manually.  With the old version you had to buy the expensive "Expert" version for this feature, but this time around there is only the one version - the expensive one of course!
    As far as I know, the new version is available to existing users only, on special request.  It is expected to be generally available at the end of this month, and the help files will be with it then.
    You do have to watch for a number of potential pitfalls:
    field order - Mercalli is not good at detecting this automatically when used as a Premiere plug-in;
    treatment of borders - an inevitable consequence of all stabilisation is that the area of video moves within the frame, leaving blank areas at the edges.  these vary from frame to frame and there are three alternative ways of handling this.  the new version is less clear in this, to me at least.  I normally zoom the video to eliminate the black borders.
    transitions - if you apply Mercalli to a clip in your timeline and then apply transitions to the end(s) of the clip, the analysis will have to be done again, as you have introduced previously unconsidered areas to the clip.  I normally apply Mercalli to the clip on a second timeline, render and export the clip, making sure that I include all the material that I may want to use, if I apply transitions.  I generally apply colour correction, etc before exporting to avoid as far as possible quality loss due to repeat rendering.  I usually apply 10% sharpen filter at this stage too.  The new version offers a stand-alone version, which I like very much as it marks in red areas of the video in which extreme correction has to be applied, opening up scope for selecting the "less-unstable areas of video for use.
    I have never used either After Effects or Mocha, but I have used all the other commercially available stabilisation software, and Mercalli gives by far the best results of the half dozen or so.  I have tried  the New Blue stabilisert, but I could not get on with it.Most of the others I have used are no longer available.  You could try SteadyHand from Gooder Video.
    Message was edited by: Alan Craven

  • Can 5 axis image stabilization be engaged with non system lenses for A7II and A7rII?

    Many people use/will use their excellent non system manual focus non system macro lenses on the A7II and undoubtedly on the soon to be released A7RII. Stabilization in the X/Y planes is very very important for macro. Sony on the A7II only stablizes the X/Y planes for lenses that report the focus distance as best I can tell. Perhaps the lens compensation app or another can be modified so this data can be manually inputted or even change the firmware to allow this and thus stabilize all 5 axes. Focal length will need to be inputted of course as well. Perhaps there is another way around this that I have missed. Thanks for any comments.

    Thank you for taking the time to answer.  I have done more digging in reviews and recalled sony's announcments which implied on 3 axis IS is available w/o a lens that reports focsing distance. Not my favorite source, but review from PCMag: "If you're using a non-native lens, or even a native manual focus lens like the Zeiss Loxia 2/50, it's stabilized along three axes—yaw, pitch, and roll. There's a technical reason for that. In order to compensate along the x and y axes, the camera needs to know the distance to the subject, which requires electronic communication of the focal distance from the lens to the body. To compensate for the other three axes, the only data that needs to be transmitted is the focal length of the lens. Even if you're using a purely mechanical Leica lensit can be stabilized—you're able to manually enter the focal length via a menu. The only real downside to this is that the A7 II does not add that focal length to the recorded EXIF data, so if you like to track which lens a shot is captured with, you'll need to take notes." http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2475439,00.asp A friend informed me that on his A7II he must mount a non OSS Sony lens first to have any image stabilization with any of his totally manual lenses--seems the camera saves the settings of the last lens attached.  Turning the cam off doesn't reset this--very odd---seems to be a bug in the firmware.  I hope the A7rII is different. This whole issue is quite confusing.  Appreciate any additonal clarification.

  • Motion tracking is not working for videos but works for images?

    Motion tracking is not working for videos but works for images. When the videos is drop onto the tracking object the videos corner don't appear highlighted. I am working on windows 7 with version 13.1.

    ivanhoeeurope
    Are you within 30 days of purchase for the Premiere Elements 13? And, did you purchase as a download from Adobe? If so, you can
    apply for a return/refund for 13. If you purchased elsewhere, then you would be governed by the return/refund policy of the seller.
    Adobe no longer sells version 12, so you would have to find a vendor who still has it in stock and purchase it. There is no way to "downgrade"
    13 to 12.
    What you may want to do is to download and install the Premiere Elements 12 tryout from the following web site to verify that 12 Motion
    Tracking works for you; whereas 13 cannot with regard to use of video for the Motion Tracking source media.
    Adobe Photoshop Elements 12 Direct Download Adobe Photoshop Elements 12 Direct Download Links, Premiere too | ProDesignTools
    Apparently this web site does not sell the tryout. It just makes it available for use.
    Before I posted my reply to you I looked at Motion Tracking with video source media on both Premiere Elements 12/12.1 and 13/13.1 on the same Windows 7 64 bit computer.
    If any questions or need clarification, please do not hesitate to ask.
    Thank you.
    ATR

  • Analyze ALL clips in project for image stabilization

    In older versions of iMovie for Mac (I used iMovie '09 until I finally get myself to switch to the recent version) I was able to analyze ALL clips for image stabilization, which took some time but could be accomplished without me sitting in front of my Mac. Now it seems that in iMovie 10 the stabilization feature only works for the selected clip. That means you select it, click the stabilization checkbox and wait and wait and wait. Then you get to make the right setting (percentage) and move on to the next clip, click the checkbox and wait and wait and wait.
    I tried selecting all clips with Cmd + A and click the checkbox, and the wheel started to spin. I was already feeling lucky to have found the solution to the afore mentioned problem, but when the wheel stops spinning and I select a random clip, some of them are analyzed but most are not.
    Is there any way to have ALL clips analyzed without user interaction?

    Welcome to the discussions...
    I've had this happen. My guess is that it's related to round-tripping to/from Color, but I can't be sure. IMHO, the sequence is corrupted. I just dealt with it for a while, then rebuilt it by making changes from an earlier version.
    Sorry I don't have a better solution, but at least you know you're not alone.
    Patrick

  • Recommended Image Size for Contact Pictures?

    Hi All,
    I want to edit up some family members to attach thier images to my iPhone contacts... Does anyone know what the preferred resolution size is for the iPhone for optimal appearance?
    I've tried to do this with outlook before, and I hate the way it dithers the images to a low quality.... I'm hoping that the iPhone doesn't do this and so I wanted to experiment with how they would appear...
    But instead of making the images just any random size, I wanted to crop them to the preferred image/pixel size so that my photoshopped images look like what I expect them to show up like...
    If you could advise with the documented or known pixel resolution size used by the iPhone it would be appreciated!

    Thanks, but I don't believe that the contacts come up full screen do they?
    Usually there is a optimal image size for certain things like contact photos and I am just trying to help ensure that all my photos are the same size and don't vary...
    I might be a little carried away with how I am formatting them, but just hoping someone already knows this answer!

  • 808 Pureview image stabilization?

    So it's been a bit since those who have purchased the 808 Pureview to have put it through tests and reviews and whatnot. The cameras pretty impressive (although I also feel that the lower res display screen allows for the camera to be super impressive - more so than it truly is).
    Nonetheless, I have a quirk in my 808 when taking video of a roaring fire with image stabilization on. Has anyone else tried this? If the video mode is on automatic or scene and if the fire is the focal point, all is well, but if the fire becomes secondary point of reference in the shot, the stabilization goes crazy and causes the screen to violently shake even though my hand is quite still... Never have I ever experienced such a phenomenon and was curious as to whether or not this is true for all cameras/devices with digital image stabilization.
    It's a great way to show a beautiful picture and instantaneously cause motion sickness in a matter of seconds!
    thought I'd inquire to see if this is normal.

    This forum is about support and discussions on Nokia devices only however you may always leave your feedback with Microsoft directly as windows phone os' system apps are released by them by posting at the following link: http://windowsphone.uservoice.com/forums/101801-fe​ature-suggestions

  • How to improve image quality for book

    I recently had a book printed from iPhoto 9 (large, hardcover) and the images in the book seem dull and dark compared to the actual images. For example, in one image of a church taken at dusk you can clearly see the outline of the church, including some details, and even people in front of it - but in the book, this area is completely black. I have had books printed before from iPhoto8 and had been happy with the past results.
    Apple is refunding my purchase and letting me submit the book again, but told me if I don't edit the photos, I may have the same issue (though they also said it could have been a printer issue that day). Customer support did agree that the image quality itself is good. So, my question is, before I resubmit this book - in general, what attributes or combination of attributes are best to change to make the images more vibrant and not dark when printed for the book (ie. increase color saturation and exposure?)
    Thank you.

    Thanks. I did indeed preview the book before, and I have followed their tips. As, I said, I have purchased several books in the past and no issue. Apple even sent a couple pictures back to me as an attachment to show what they received, and they matched what I sent, but NOT what was printed. What printed is definitely much darker and in many cases you can't even make out the detail that you could in the images (including the ones they sent back to me for comparison). Maybe the printer really was off. I'll try a few enhancements and try again.

  • No thumbnail images when viewing pictures folder via desktop & screensaver

    When I go into system preferences and then Desktop & Screensaver I chose the pictures folder. It does not show any thumbnail images of any of the contents of my Pictures Folder, yet clicking on a blank area of space applies a desktop???? I have never seen this before anyone have any ideas?

    There may be some minor issue or glitch in the system; and perhaps even
    starting up in SafeBoot and using Disk Utility's repair disk permissions, then
    quitting the utility, and restarting normally may help repair this situation.
    Some file types, in some cases, may not appear in icon or thumbnail view;
    and there are a few image editor applications whose custom icon thumb-
    nail views actually appear as a generic icon w/o an image; but an original
    import from a camera will have the correct thumbnail captured by Finder
    and/or Preview (or iPhoto) by first-contact with the image from the camera;
    but Photoshop or other third party shareware or freeware may not show one.
    For a normal situation where a thumbnail image icon should be present:
    Open up a finder window and do like this: from Finder=View=Show View Options
    =Show Icon Preview. That will give you a thumbnail view of whatever document it is.
    You can select to do this setting for all windows
    Apparently your situation is different in that there may be a permissions or other
    issue going on in the system; so try routine maintenance and also see if the images
    are in the correct location for the system to see them. If the system is really messed
    you may have to consider repairing it; try booting from the native disk utility in OS X
    boot/installer disc, repair disk and repair disk permissions; then reboot using Startup
    Disk in the boot disc's utilities menu (in installer menubar) and immediately press &
    hold the Shift key on startup to engage SafeBoot; and re-repair disk permissions
    from the System's hard drive located Disk Utility to re-correct these permissions, as
    they will probably not be proper for the fully updated system running in the computer.
    Then restart normally.
    There may be file damage, so if that is discovered through additional troubleshooting,
    you may have to consider a new system folder, as in "Archive & Install" then update.
    Repair disk permissions between all update & install steps of system and other software.
    If you have and use a utility interface tool such as OnyX (runs free, is donationware) from
    Titanium Software, download from their site; and run all the checkbox items in Automation,
    and then restart the computer - or set its preferences to do that also, automatically - this
    may help general system health. It may not be able to fix something deeper in the system;
    but a third party disk utility such as DiskWarrior or Drive Genius2 may help in other matters.
    In some cases, depending on what images are involved and where they came from, be
    they a chosen set of personal images you've directed the system to use as background
    desktop images in Finder, or a set of Apple-supplied images, the results can be different.
    I use a folder of camera created scenics as desktop backgrounds and use ToyViewer to
    edit and rotate at a most basic level, since I try to make photos in the camera and not edit.
    Sometimes, these will have generic non-image icons and not thumbnails; there is a way
    to work around the issue should a whole folder of them go bad or change over w/o notice.
    Hopefully someone who has fixed this problem will write a follow up; it is getting late in my
    timezone and I am running on empty per this topic, among others... You may resort to an
    Apple help or Apple Support documents search for a matching topic. That's a huge library.
    Good luck & happy computing!

  • Image stabilization question...

    I have use the image stabilization in Motion and found it very good.
    I have also got AE CS3 (Windows) which does not have a good comparitive image stabilization.
    What 3rd party plug in should I buy for AE that would do a good job?
    (At the moment I am testing out Mocha but the trial version would let me export more than 10 frames !!! So, I can't really tell what a good overall job its done?)
    ps: I know its an Apple forum,but I know a lot of users here also have AE and would like to help me out)

    You might have better luck at Creative Cow. Lot of AE users hang out there.
    Andy

  • Lightroom 3 does NOT support raw files for the  Canon Sureshot S95

    Have just bought the new Canon Sureshot S95
    after contacting Adobe support I am told Lightroom 3 does NOT support raw files for the
    Canon Sureshot S95.
    Come on Adobe.....please provide an update asap.

    (1) Well Boss I did what you said and used Canon DPP to convert to TIFFs. Choices are 8-bit TIFF or 16-bit TIFF - I chose 16-bit because part (90% part) of the reason for wanting to work in RAW is to keep the bit depth of teh original. On my EOS 40D it is supposedly 14 bits, which gives great scope to play with the levels & curves without seeing poster effects. If I choose 16 bit TIFF then each S95 image becomes a 70MB file, parallel to my JPEG and RAW.  Hardly a satisfactory solution.
    (I realise, however, that I don't actually know the bit depth of the S95 RAW file - anybody? ). 
    (2) SUGGESTION-  even if you are adding S95 support to the next update (which I dearly hope), be kinder to those with new cameras in general and allow LR to import JPEGs if it cannot import the RAWs (overriding if necessary the 'ignore JPEG' preference setting).  I am sure users with that preference would still prefer a JPEG than no picture at all!
    Since I discovered this compatibility problem, I switched the camera to record RAW+JPEG*. To my great irritation LR3 ignores the JPEGs even though it cannot load the RAWs.  So if I want to import from one supported camera (EOS40D) and one unsupported camera (S95) I have to keep going into preferences to switch on and off the 'ignore JPEG' function.
    JJ
    *  (this seems to be a setting that needs doing in the various different modes of the camera, by the way).

Maybe you are looking for